Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism within the Interferon Gamma Receptor 2 Gene Perfectly Coincides with Polledness in Holstein Cattle

  • Sabrina Glatzer ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sabrina Glatzer, Nina Johanna Merten

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

  • Nina Johanna Merten ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Sabrina Glatzer, Nina Johanna Merten

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

  • Claudia Dierks,

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

  • Anne Wöhlke,

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

  • Ute Philipp,

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

  • Ottmar Distl

    ottmar.distl@tiho-hannover.de

    Affiliation Institute for Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Abstract

Polledness is a high impact trait in modern milk and beef production to meet the demands of animal welfare and work safety. Previous studies have mapped the polled-locus to the proximal region of the bovine chromosome 1 (BTA1) and narrowed it down to approximately 1 Mb. Sequencing of the positional candidate genes within the 1 Mb polled region and whole genome sequencing of Holsteins revealed a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) AC000158: g.1390292G>A within intron 3 of the interferon gamma receptor 2 gene (IFNGR2) in perfect co-segregation with polledness in Holsteins. This complete association was validated in 443 animals of the same breed. This SNP allows reliable genotyping of horned, heterozygous and homozygous polled Holsteins, even in animals that could not be resolved using the previously published haplotype for Holstein.

Introduction

Breeding genetically polled cattle offers many advantages for modern beef and milk production. Polled animals are usually easier to handle, safer to work with and are less aggressive among each other. The risk of injuries causing depression in milk production, insufficiency in beef-quality and faults in leather are decreased. In Germany, dehorning of calves without anaesthetics is allowed until the age of 6 weeks. Nevertheless, this procedure is connected with pain for the animal and can lead to extensive damage if there are complications. Due to animal welfare affairs, a prohibition of dehorning in Germany is foreseeable. Furthermore, dehorning is rendered unnecessary when breeding genetically polled cattle and thus, the farmer can save time and money.

As well as rumination and cloven hooves, pneumatised horns are a typical characteristic of the bovine species. However, the appearance of polled cattle centuries ago is proven by prehistoric carvings in Scotland from before recorded history and Egyptian sculptures and paintings from around 3000 before Christ [1].

Polledness in cattle is an autosomal dominant trait [24]. The polled-locus was mapped to the centromeric region of BTA1 [58] and narrowed down between the microsatellites RP42-218J17_MS1 (661 kb) and BM6438 (2,025 kb) [9]. This area shows conserved synteny with human chromosome 21 (HSA1) [10,11].

A window of nine SNPs from 488 kb to 1,338 kb on BTA1 showed the greatest composite log likelihood (CLL) for the polled condition comparing a subset holding significant numbers of polled individuals to the breeds in the International Bovine HapMap study (IBHM). The SNP featuring the largest difference in allelic frequency between polled and horned animals was located within the interferon gamma receptor 2 gene (IFNGR2) [12].

Genotyping 285 animals of different cattle breeds with the bovine SNP50 BeadChip (Illumina) displayed a region of 381 kb on BTA1 where all 101 polled animals were homozygous for all genotyped SNPs [13]. This region harbours the three genes histone cluster 1, H4i like (HIST1H4C), oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1 (OLIG1) and chromosome 1 open reading frame, human C21orf62 (C1H21orf62) and the two pseudogenes oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 like (OLIG2 like) and 40S ribosomal protein S13 like (LOC782947). Using the Agilent 44k bovine array, expression levels from tissue-samples of the horn-forming region of polled and horned animals were examined. Differences in relative expression levels among horned and polled cattle could not be found for the genes located in the 1-Mb-polled-region on BTA1 [14].

A 202-bp-indel located between the genes IFNAR2 and OLIG1 is highly associated with polledness in several European cattle breeds, but not in Holsteins [15]. For Holsteins only a haplotype of seven intergenic polymorphisms was detected spanning an interval of 260 kb including the genes HIST1H4C, OLIG1 and C1H21orf62 and the pseudogenes OLIG2 like and LOC782947 [15]. To our knowledge, no reliable single polymorphism differentiating polled and horned Holsteins has yet been found.

In this study, we screened the genes mitochondrial ribosomal protein S6 (MRPS6), solute carrier family 5 (sodium/myo-inositol cotransporter), member 3 (SLC5A3), ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, O subunit (ATP5O), intersectin 1 (SH3 domain protein) (ITSN1), crystallin, zeta (quinone reductase)-like 1 (CRYZL1), downstream neighbor of SON (DONSON), SON DNA binding protein (SON), phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, phosphoribosylglycinamide synthetase, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole synthetase (GART), uncharacterized LOC784171, transmembrane protein 50B (TMEM50B), interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2), interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 1 (IFNAR1), interleukin 10 receptor, beta (IL10RB), interferon (alpha, beta and omega) receptor 2 (IFNAR2), HIST1H4C and OLIG1 and the pseudogenes LOC782947 and OLIG2-like within the 1 Mb polled region for polymorphisms with high association to polledness in Holsteins and detected a SNP within the gene interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2) in complete co-segregation with polledness in 443 Holsteins.

Results

Mutation analysis and genotyping

Highest association with polledness in Holsteins was identified for polymorphisms within the interferon gamma receptor 2 gene (IFNGR2). In total, 41 SNPs and two indel mutations were detected within IFNGR2 by sequencing of PCR products (Table S1 Figure S1). Using next generation sequencing technique, further 18 SNPs and five indels were discovered within IFNGR2 (Table S2 Figure S1). The SNPs AC000158: g.1390505T>C, AC000158: g.1390528T>C, AC000158: g.1376880T>A, AC000158: g.1376884T>C, AC000158: g.1376932A>G and AC000158: g.1376977A>G were localised within the coding sequence of exon 3 and 7 of IFNGR2, respectively (Figure 1). AC000158: g.1376520T>C was located within the 3’ UTR (Figure 1). All other polymorphisms were intronic. The indels AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT were not observed in breeds other than Holstein. We genotyped all SNPs and indels with high association to polledness in further 11 homozygous polled, 61 heterozygous polled and 336 horned Holsteins. Although most Holsteins were born in Germany or male animals had a German herdbook number, their genetic origin was highly diverse (Figure S2), as crossing with animals from different countries is common in Holstein breeding to improve milk yield. The ancestry is known for 82 of the 86 polled animals. Five of these animals were female. Two of these female Holsteins were born in Germany and Spain, respectively, and one female Holstein was born in the United Kingdom. Of the male Holsteins, 57% were born in Germany, 14% in the United States of America, 14% in the Netherlands, 5% in Canada, 4% in the Czech Republic, 3% in the United Kingdom and 1% in Spain and Belgium, respectively (Figure S3). Of these animals, 87% have ancestors from other than their native country. Parents came from Germany, the United States of America, the Netherlands, Canada or France and grandparents from Germany, the United States of America, the Netherlands, Canada, Italy or Austria. This high diversity of ancestry assures representation of many important polled lineages including animals from Aggravation, Burket-Falls, Hickorymea, Dansire, Sandy-Valley, West Port Holsteins, Arron Doon Holsteins, Golden Oaks, Baldus Holsteins and Hollysprings.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Gene structure of IFNGR2.

Rectangles indicate exons. Coding sequence is filled with black, the 3’ UTR is filled with white. The size of exons and introns is specified in number of base pairs (bp). The black line below illustrates the sections analysed by PCR in Holsteins. Each PCR-product is pictured separately with start and end position. Position of start and stop codon is stated in bp. All detected exonic polymorphisms and intronic polymorphisms showing association with polledness in Holsteins are given with name and position above the gene model. Each position is given with accordance to Bos taurus assembly UMD3.1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.g001

Polymorphisms that showed association in all Holsteins were genotyped in further 21 homozygous polled, 43 heterozygous polled and 28 horned German Fleckvieh and five homozygous polled, nine heterozygous polled and eight horned Charolais.

Association analysis

The SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A, within intron 3 showed a highly significant association with the polled genotype (χ²=423, -log10P=91.85) (Table 1 Figure 1) and perfect co-segregation in all 443 Holsteins. All horned Holsteins showed the genotype G/G, all heterozygous polled Holsteins the genotype G/A, and all homozygous polled Holsteins the genotype A/A. However, association could not be confirmed for the tested animals of the breeds Charolais and German Fleckvieh, as they had the genotype G/G in either case, whether they were horned or polled.

Polymorphism-IDχ² genotype-log10PInfluence on amino acid chain and protein functionInfluence on transcription factor binding site
AC000158:g.1376520T>C0.010.04Activator protein 1
(AP-1) binding site disrupted
AC000158:g.1376880T>A2.440.93missense (T>S),
probably damaging
AC000158:g.1376884T>C2.440.93synonymous
AC000158:g.1376932A>G2.440.93synonymous
AC000158:g.1376977A>G1.730.73synonymous
AC000158:g.1390292G>A424.8592.26
AC000158:g.1390505T>C0.330.25missense (R>G); benign
AC000158:g.1390528T>C0.00missense (K>R); benign
AC000158:g.1394768_771delCTGC70.3715.18
AC000158:g.1400851_852delCT56.2212.21Interferon consensus sequence
binding protein (ICSBP)
binding site disrupted

Table 1. Polymorphisms within the interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2) gene on BTA1 with association to polledness in Holsteins and exonic mutations in IFNGR2 which failed association tests for polledness.

For exonic polymorphisms their influence on the amino acid sequence and the protein structure analysed with PolyPhen-2 is given. For intronic polymorphisms their influence on transcription factor binding sites analysed with AliBaba2.1 is specified.
CSV
Download CSV

There was one progeny-proven pure-bred heterozygous polled Holstein sire used in artificial insemination with a polled mother and polled grandmother that was heterozygous for the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A. This animal carried neither the previously published 202-bp-indel associated with polledness in cattle [15] nor the polled-associated alleles from three tested markers (P5ID, PC1768587A and P80kbID) belonging to the previously published polled-associated haplotype of seven polymorphisms [15]. Thus, this sire would not have been identified as genetically polled without the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A. Furthermore, there was one homozygous polled pure-bred Holstein that was a compound heterozygote for the polled and horned alleles at both the seven polymorphism haplotype and 202 bp indel loci predictive of polled [15]. However, this animal was homozygous A/A for the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A, and was therefore identified reliably as homozygous polled by only genotyping this SNP.

The SNP AC000158: g.1385927G>A in intron 4 was also significantly associated with the horned and polled genotypes in the initially analysed animals (χ²=13, -log10P=2.82). Association of this SNP could not be confirmed analysing an extended number of Holsteins. All three genotypes were found in the analysed homozygous polled animals. This SNP was thus not genotyped in all horned animals.

The indels AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT showed significant association (Table 1 Figure 1) but since they did not perfectly co-segregate with the horned and polled phenotype as did the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A, they were genotyped in all polled but not all of the horned animals.

SNPs within the coding sequence of exons 3 and 7 (AC000158: g.1376880T>A, AC000158: g.1376884T>C, AC000158: g.1376932A>G, AC000158: g.1390505T>C and AC000158: g.1390528T>C) and the SNP AC000158: g.1376520T>C within the 3’ UTR were not associated with polledness in Holsteins (Table 1).

The r2-values indicating correlation among mutated alleles showed that the three polymorphisms AC000158: g.1390292G>A, AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT are in a strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) (Figure 2). Although these three mutations are located over 200 kb proximal on BTA1 to the three markers P5ID, PC1768587A and P80kbID [15], all six polymorphisms form a haplotype block of 519 kb length (Figure 2).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Linkage disequilibrium among markers within the 1 Mb BTA1 region associated with polledness in Holsteins.

AC000158: g.1390292G>A, AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT are newly discovered polymorphisms located in the IFNGR2 gene. P5ID, PC1768587A and P80kbID represent three markers of the polled-haplotype previously published for Holstein [15]. LD coefficients (r2) between pairs of polymorphisms are indicated as black letters in red fields. All pictured polymorphisms share one common haplotype block of 519 kb length.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.g002

Discussion

Of the examined genes MRPS6, SLC5A3, ATP5O, ITSN1, CRYZL1, DONSON, SON, GART, LOC784171, TMEM50B, IFNGR2, IFNAR1, IL10RB, IFNAR2, HIST1H4C and OLIG1 and the pseudogenes 40S ribosomal protein S13-like and OLIG2-like within the 1-Mb-polled-region on BTA1, the highest association with polledness in Holsteins was found within the interferon gamma receptor 2 gene (IFNGR2). Within this gene, we detected the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A that perfectly cosegregates with polledness in Holsteins.

IFNGR2 encodes the non-ligand-binding beta chain of the gamma interferon receptor which is involved in immunological pathways. There are currently no known functions of the IFNGR2 gene that could play a role in the growth of horns.

The SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A is unlikely to have a causal function for polledness in Holsteins, as it is located in a noncoding region of the IFNGR2 gene (intron 3) and effects on gene regulating elements were not found. The other associated polymorphisms (AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT) are also located within introns. The indel AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT in intron 1 was associated with polledness and disrupts a transcription factor binding site (Table 1) but the affected factor ICSBP has no distinguishable role in the development of horns and the distribution of alleles does not discriminate the polled genotype in the analysed animals. AC000158: g.1394768_771delCTGC and AC000158: g.1400851_852delCT, therefore, do not seem to have a causal function, either.

SNPs within exon 3 of IFNGR2 (AC000158: g.1390505T>C and AC000158: g.1390528T>C) led to amino acid changes but were predicted to be benign. Only a SNP AC000158: g.1376880T>A causing an amino acid change from threonine to serine on cDNA position 338 was evaluated as probably damaging to protein function using PolyPhen-2 but failed the significance for association with polledness.

The SNP AC000158: g.1376520T>C within the 3’ UTR disrupts a binding site for the factor AP-1 (Table 1), which is involved in cell transformation, inflammation, innate immune response and cell death. However, this SNP was not associated with polledness.

AC000158: g.1376880T>A causing an amino acid change within the encoded protein shows no significant associations with polledness in cattle. Thus, the coding sequence of IFNGR2 is unlikely to exert an influence on the development of horns. MicroRNAs located within the IFNGR2-gene were not found in the human and mouse database miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/). High conservation of microRNA-regions in various species is often observed [16]. Multiple sequence alignment including the species cow, mouse, human and sheep was performed using the program ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/). For intron 3 of IFNGR2 harbouring the highly associated SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A identity-values from 59% between the species human and cow to 90% between the species cow and sheep were found.

However, there could be mutations within currently unknown regulatory regions nearby or within the IFNGR2 gene or mutations within the 1-Mb-polled-region that interact with the IFNGR2 gene that may cause polledness in Holsteins. Thus, the IFNGR2 gene cannot be excluded as a potential candidate gene for polledness in cattle.

Nevertheless, the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A showed perfect co-segregation with polledness in Holsteins. Nearly 90% of the examined Holsteins have a multinational background with ancestors from at least one of 11 different countries. Despite of that their polled genotype could be determined reliably by analysing the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A. The genotype of one heterozygous polled Holstein sire could be confirmed using this SNP, while this animal neither carried the previously published haplotype block nor the 202-bp-indel associated with polledness in cattle [15]. One homozygous polled Holstein that was a compound heterozygous for the haplotype block of seven polymorphisms and the 202-bp-indel [15] was revealed to be homozygous polled by the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A. Thus, the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A can be used as single polymorphism for testing of the polled genotype of pure-bred Holsteins, independent of their origin.

The IFNGR2 gene is located within the 1-Mb-polled-region but more than 200 kb proximal to the published homozygosity region [13]. The high association of the SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A within intron 3 of IFNGR2 indicates that the causal polled mutation is not necessarily located within this homozygous region of 381 kb. Performing homozygosity mapping, small associated regions can be missed due to the distribution of SNPs examined using the BovineSNP50 BeadChip (Illumina) if these small regions are located in-between the genotyped SNPs. Furthermore, homozygosity mapping across breeds would not be successful if the polled mutation is non-allelic among the different polled breeds. The candidate region for polled therefore still contains the entire non-recombinant region of approximately 1 Mb between the microsatellites RP42-218J17_MS1 (661 kb) and BM6438 (2,025 kb) [9].

Conclusions

Herein, we demonstrate a single SNP as a useful and reliable marker for polledness in Holsteins, independent of their origin. We furthermore propose that the whole well-established candidate interval that showed no recombination in polled animals from 661 kb to 2,025 kb on BTA1 should be scanned to find the causal polled mutation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All animal work has been conducted according to the national and international guidelines for animal welfare. The Lower Saxony state veterinary office at the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany, was the responsible Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) for this specific study. The EDTA-blood and semen sampling for the present study had been approved by the IACUC of Lower Saxony, the state veterinary office at the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany (registration number 02A/101).

Animals, phenotypic data and DNA preparation

EDTA preserved blood samples of three male and one female homozygous polled, five male and five female heterozygous polled and two male and 19 female horned, not closely related pure-bred Holsteins were used for the detection of new polymorphisms. The genotypes of the homozygous polled animals were proved by progeny-testing. The heterozygous polled animals were each offspring of a polled sire and a horned dam.

For genotyping of polymorphisms with highest association with polledness we used further EDTA preserved blood samples and semen samples of 11 homozygous polled, 61 heterozygous and 336 horned unrelated Holsteins of highly diverse origin (Figures S2-S3).

In addition, we used EDTA preserved blood samples of 21 homozygous polled, 43 heterozygous polled and 28 horned German Fleckvieh and five homozygous polled, nine heterozygous polled and eight horned Charolais. Bovine genomic DNA was isolated from EDTA preserved blood using the NucleoSpin 96 Blood Quick Pure Kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) or from EDTA preserved blood samples or semen samples following a standard protocol with ethanol-precipitation.

Mutation analyses

Primers for PCR were designed using primer3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/) covering intergenic regions and the genes MRPS6, SLC5A3, ATP5O, ITSN1, CRYZL1, DONSON, SON, GART, LOC784171, TMEM50B, IFNGR2, IFNAR1, IL10RB, IFNAR2, HIST1H4C and OLIG1 and the pseudogenes LOC782947 and OLIG2-like (Table S1). Repetitive regions in sequence-data were masked using RepeatMasker (http://www.repeatmasker.org/) before developing the primers. In addition, we applied Primer-BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast) to ensure that the designed primer sequences were unique within the bovine genome. PCR-products were directly sequenced. PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 32 μl using 2 μl (~ 20 ng/µl) genomic DNA, 3.2 μl 10x PCR buffer, 0.62 μl DMSO, 0.62 μl dNTPs (10 mM each), 0.18 μl (100 pmol/μl) of each primer and 0.18 μl Taq Polymerase (MP Biomedicals, Eschwege, Germany). The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by 36 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, optimal annealing temperature (Ta, differed between 57°C and 60°C, according to the primer) for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 45 sec. The PCR was completed with a final cooling at 4°C for 10 min.

The amplicons were purified using the MinElute 96 UF Plate (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, München, Germany) and directly sequenced with the DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) on a MegaBACE 1000 capillary sequencer (GE Healthcare) or an ABI Prism 3500 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). Determined sequence data was analyzed using the Sequencher 4.8 program (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI) and screened for polymorphisms.

Additionally, the genomes of one homozygous polled and three horned Holsteins and two DNA-pools, respectively, with six horned Holsteins each were sequenced using paired-end sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (LGC Genomics, Berlin, Germany). On the average, an eight-fold coverage per sample was accomplished.

Genotyping

Genotyping of SNPs was performed by sequencing as described above. SNPs AC000158: g.1390292G>A and AC000158: g.1385927G>A were genotyped by PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) or mismatch PCR-RFLP [17], respectively. The restriction enzymes were selected from the NEBcutter V 2.0 (http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter2/). For SNP AC000158: g.1390292G>A the restriction enzyme Hha1 was used. For genotyping of SNP AC000158: g.1385927G>A we used the restriction enzyme DdeI. Digested products were size-fractionated by gel electrophoresis on 2% to 4% agarose gels (peqGOLD Universal Agarose, Peqlab Biotechnologie, Erlangen, Germany).

Indel mutations were amplified by using DY-682-tagged primers (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany). PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 12 μl using 2 μl (~ 20 ng/µl) genomic DNA, 1.2 μl 10x PCR buffer, 0.4 μl DMSO, 0.2 μl dNTPs (10mM each), 0.5 μl (10 pmol/μl) of each primer and 0.2 μl Taq Polymerase (MP Biomedicals). The PCR conditions were as follows: 5 min initial denaturation at 94°C, followed by 36 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 58°C to 60°C (optimal annealing temperature according to the primer) for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 30 sec. The PCR was completed with a final cooling at 4°C for 10 min. Afterwards the PCR products were analysed by gel electrophoresis on the automated sequencer LI-COR 4300 (LI-COR, Bad Homburg, Germany) using 4% to 6% polyacrylamide denaturing gels (Rotiphorese Gel40, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). Differences in allele sizes caused by deleted or inserted bases were defined by visual examination.

Statistical analyses

Association analysis with polledness in cattle was carried out for the detected polymorphisms. The markers have been tested for their polymorphism information content, Hardy-Weinberg-Equilibrium (HWE) and association with the polled phenotype and the polled genotype using the procedures ALLELE and CASECONTROL of SAS/Genetics, Version 9.3 (Statistical Analysis System, Cary, NC, 2012). Statistical calculation of pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) was performed and pictured using HAPLOVIEW 4.2 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/). For detection of SNPs with strong LD among the alleles we used the tagger algorithm r2≥0.8[18]. .

In silico screening for binding sites of gene-regulating elements

Polymorphisms associated with polledness and mutations located within the UTR-regions were screened for effects on binding sites for gene regulating elements using AliBaba 2.1 (http://www.gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2/index.html).

SNPs localised in coding sequence were examined for causing amino acid changes. Discovered changes in amino acid order were analysed using PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2) with regard to their influence on protein function.

The expression of genes can also be regulated post-transcriptionally by microRNAs (small non-coding RNAs) [19]. In vertebrates 40-70% of microRNAs are expressed from introns [20]. The database miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/) was therefore scanned for microRNAs contained inside the IFNGR2-gene in human and mouse.

Supporting Information

Figure S1. Gene structure of IFNGR2 with PCR-products and all polymorphisms.

(a) Rectangles indicate exons. Coding sequence is filled with black, the untranslated region is filled with white. The size of exons and introns is specified in number of base pairs (bp). The black lines below illustrate the sections analysed in Holsteins. Each PCR-product is pictured separately with start and ending position. Position of start and stop codon is stated in bp. All polymorphisms in Holsteins are given with name and position. Each position is given with accordance to Bos taurus assembly UMD3.1. (b) Coverage-data for the IFNGR2 gene sequenced in the course of whole genome sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (LGC).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.s001

(DOC)

Figure S2. Pedigrees of two heterozygous polled Holstein sires.

For each ancestor the birth-country and the polled genotype are given, if known. (a) Heterozygous polled Holstein sire born in Germany with ancestors from United States on the mother’s side and a British father with ancestors from Italy and Canada. (b) Heterozygous polled Holstein sire born in Belgium but with German herdbook number. The animal has ancestors from the Netherlands and Austria on the mother’s side and a Canadian father with US ancestors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.s002

(DOC)

Figure S3. Countries of birth of 77 of the 81 polled Holstein sires.

The countries are each drawn in a different colour. The distribution is given in per cent.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.s003

(DOC)

Table S1. PCR-primers used for mutation analyses.

For each primer localisation, name, the sequence, annealing temperature and product sizes in base pairs (bp) are given.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.s004

(DOC)

Table S2. Polymorphisms located in the bovine interferon gamma receptor 2 (IFNGR2) on BTA1 in Holsteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067992.s005

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank the cattle breeding associations for providing samples and the pedigree information. We acknowledge Mogens Drabert, Heike Klippert-Hasberg and Stefan Neander for their expert technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: OD CD SG AW. Performed the experiments: SG NM CD AW UP OD. Analyzed the data: SG NM CD OD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: OD SG AW CD. Wrote the manuscript: SG NM OD.

References

  1. 1. Lange H (1989) Untersuchungen über Hornlosigkeit und Kopfform beim deutschen Fleckvieh. Inaugural-Dissertation. Munich: Veterinary Faculty of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University.
  2. 2. White WT, Ibsen H (1936) Horn inheritance in Galloway-Holstein cattle crosses. J Genet 32: 33-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982500.
  3. 3. Long CR, Gregory KE (1978) Inheritance of the horned, scurred, and polled condition in cattle. J Hered 69: 395-400.
  4. 4. Brem G, Karnbaum B, Rosenberg E (1982) Zur Vererbung der Hornlosigkeit beim Fleckvieh. Bayer Landwirtsch Jahrb 59: 688-695.
  5. 5. Georges M, Drinkwater R, Lefort A, Libert F, King T et al. (1993) Microsatellite mapping of a gene affecting horn development in Bos taurus. Nat Genet 4: 206-210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0693-206. PubMed: 8348158.
  6. 6. Schmutz SM, Marquess FL, Berryere TG, Moker JS (1995) DNA marker-assisted selection of the polled condition in Charolais cattle. Mamm Genome 6: 710-713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354293. PubMed: 8563169.
  7. 7. Harlizius B, Tammen I, Eichler K, Eggen A, Hetzel DJ (1997) New markers on bovine chromosome 1 are closely linked to the polled gene in Simmental and Pinzgauer cattle. Mamm Genome 8: 255-257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900404. PubMed: 9096105.
  8. 8. Drögemüller C, Bader A, Wöhlke A, Kuiper H, Leeb T et al. (2002) A high-resolution comparative RH map of the proximal part of bovine chromosome 1. Anim Genet 33: 271-279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.00866.x. PubMed: 12139506.
  9. 9. Drögemüller C, Wöhlke A, Mömke S, Distl O (2005) Fine mapping of the polled locus to a 1-Mb region on bovine chromosome 1q12. Mamm Genome 16: 613-620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-005-0016-0. PubMed: 16180143.
  10. 10. Threadgill DS, Kraus JP, Krawetz SA, Womack JE (1991) Evidence for the evolutionary origin of human chromosome 21 from comparative gene mapping in the cow and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 154-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.1.154. PubMed: 1986361.
  11. 11. Chowdhary BP, Frönicke L, Gustavsson I, Scherthan H (1996) Comparative analysis of the cattle and human genomes: detection of ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mamm Genome 7: 297-302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900086. PubMed: 8661702.
  12. 12. Stella A, Ajmone-Marsan P, Lazzari B, Boettcher P (2010) Identification of selection signatures in cattle breeds selected for dairy production. Genetics 185: 1451-1461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.116111. PubMed: 20479146.
  13. 13. Seichter D, Russ I, Rothammer S, Eder J, Förster M et al. (2012) SNP-based association mapping of the polled gene in divergent cattle breeds. Anim Genet 43: 595-598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02302.x. PubMed: 22497248.
  14. 14. Mariasegaram M, Reverter A, Barris W, Lehnert SA, Dalrymple B et al. (2010) Transcription profiling provides insights into gene pathways involved in horn and scurs development in cattle. BMC Genomics 11: 370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-370. PubMed: 20537189.
  15. 15. Medugorac I, Seichter D, Graf A, Russ I, Blum H et al. (2012) Bovine polledness--an autosomal dominant trait with allelic heterogeneity. PLOS ONE 7: e39477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039477. PubMed: 22737241.
  16. 16. Kim KS, Kim JS, Lee MR, Jeong HS, Kim J (2009) A study of microRNAs in silico and in vivo: emerging regulators of embryonic stem cells. FEBS J 276: 2140-2149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06932.x. PubMed: 19250314.
  17. 17. Quadros L, Ghosh K, Shetty S (2008) Establishment of a new mismatch PCR-RFLP technique for detection of G10430A common mutation present in moderate to mild haemophilia B patients belonging to Gujarati community from the western part of India. Haemophilia 14: 628-629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01704.x. PubMed: 18393981.
  18. 18. de Bakker PI, Yelensky R, Pe’er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ et al. (2005) Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet 37: 1217-1223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1669. PubMed: 16244653.
  19. 19. Ma C, Liu Y, He L (2009) MicroRNAs - powerful repression comes from small RNAs. Sci China C 4: 323-330. PubMed: 19381458.
  20. 20. Griffiths-Jones S, Saini HK, van Dongen S, Enright AJ (2008) miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D154-D158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn221. PubMed: 17991681.