Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genome-Wide Association Study for Wool Production Traits in a Chinese Merino Sheep Population

  • Zhipeng Wang,

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Hui Zhang,

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Hua Yang,

    Affiliation Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi, P.R. China

  • Shouzhi Wang,

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Enguang Rong,

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Wenyu Pei,

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Hui Li ,

    wangning@neau.edu.cn (NW); lihui@neau.edu.cn (HL)

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

  • Ning Wang

    wangning@neau.edu.cn (NW); lihui@neau.edu.cn (HL)

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang province, Harbin, P. R. China, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, P. R. China

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) provide a powerful approach for identifying quantitative trait loci without prior knowledge of location or function. To identify loci associated with wool production traits, we performed a genome-wide association study on a total of 765 Chinese Merino sheep (JunKen type) genotyped with 50 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In the present study, five wool production traits were examined: fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, staple length and crimp. We detected 28 genome-wide significant SNPs for fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, and crimp trait in the Chinese Merino sheep. About 43% of the significant SNP markers were located within known or predicted genes, including YWHAZ, KRTCAP3, TSPEAR, PIK3R4, KIF16B, PTPN3, GPRC5A, DDX47, TCF9, TPTE2, EPHA5 and NBEA genes. Our results not only confirm the results of previous reports, but also provide a suite of novel SNP markers and candidate genes associated with wool traits. Our findings will be useful for exploring the genetic control of wool traits in sheep.

Introduction

Sheep (Ovis aries) are one of the earliest domesticated animals. Sheep provide humans with a source of meat, milk, wool, and skins, and play a vital role in the global agricultural economy. The Merino sheep is an economically influential breed of sheep prized for its wool. Merino wool is regarded as the finest and softest wool of any sheep. Wool quality traits, such as fiber diameter, length and strength, are important goals in Merino breeding programs. Most countries have high-quality performance measurement programs and well-developed tools for index selection using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). However, in the field of sheep breeding for high wool quality, it is difficult to accurately evaluate the genetic component for wool quality traits since the phenotypes of these traits are difficult to be measured.

Over recent decades, advances in DNA-based marker technology have made it possible to identify genomic regions or quantitative trait loci (QTLs) underlying complex traits, such as fiber diameter, in Merino sheep. Instead of traditional animal breeding programs solely relying on phenotype and pedigree information, the incorporation of detected QTLs into genetic evaluation has the potential to enhance selection accuracy, thereby expediting the genetic improvement of animal productivity. A number of papers have been published concerning the detection of QTLs for wool traits. To date, 31 QTLs for wool traits have been reported via genome scan based on marker-QTL linkage analyses (http://cn.animalgenome.org/cgi-bin/QTLdb/OA/index, Aug, 2013) [1]. The limitations of QTL mapping using linkage analysis (LA) and/or linkage disequilibrium (LD), based on panels of low to moderate-density markers, have been well documented [2], [3]. Only a few major genes, e.g., the KRTAP6 gene (keratin-associated protein 6) [4], the PROP1 gene (PROP paired-like homeobox 1) [5] and ADRB3 (beta3-adrenergic receptor) [6], have been associated with wool traits using QTL linkage analyses or candidate gene studies.

With the advent of genome-wide panels of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), it has become possible to identify and localize QTLs for complex traits in many livestock species [7], including cattle [8][12], Swine [13][15], chicken [16][18], sheep [19][22], horse [23], [24], dog [25], [26], and also in humans [27][35] using the approach of a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Compared with traditional QTL mapping strategies, a GWAS has major advantages both in its power to detect causal variants with modest effects and in defining narrower genomic regions harboring causal variants for economically important traits. GWASs have been widely accepted as a primary approach for gene identification and have achieved some success in identifying genes conferring modest disease risks in humans [27][35].

To date, only a small number of GWASs in sheep have been conducted because of limited information available for the sheep genome. These studies mainly focused on diseases [19], [20], morphology [21], milk production [22] and meat production traits [36]. A group of consecutive SNPs was found to be associated with Chondrodysplasia (a condition in which the legs are malformed) [19]. A mutation of the DMP1 gene was identified to be associated with inherited rickets of Corriedale sheep by a GWAS [20].

Johnston et al.. [21] determined the main candidate gene for sheep horn size and horn-type as RXFP2. García-Gámez et al.. [22] identified the LALBA gene influencing milk protein percentage in dairy sheep. Zhang et al.. [36] found that five genes are likely to be the most crucial candidate genes associated with post-weaning weight gain, including MEF2B, RFXANK, CAMKMT, TRHDE, and RIPK2. Nevertheless, no GWAS for sheep wool traits has been performed.

The main objective of this study was to detect significant SNP loci for wool traits on a genome-wide scale using the Illumina sheep SNP50 BeadChip, and to explore potential causal genetic variants and major candidate genes for wool traits.

Materials and Methods

Animal population

All animal work was conducted according to the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals established by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Approval number: 2006–398) and was approved by the Laboratory Animal Management Committee of Northeast Agricultural University.

A total of 765 Chinese Merino sheep (JunKen type) used in this study came from the Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science. These sheep were from six strains of Chinese Merino sheep (strain A (n = 159), strain B (n = 103), strain U (n = 35), strain D (n = 145), strain DR (n = 135) and strain X (n = 188)). All of these sheep were located in the same farm. We measured and recorded five wool production traits: fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, staple length and crimp. The descriptive statistics of the phenotypic measurements of the sheep used for the GWAS are given in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of phenotype values of wool traits for sheep population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.t001

SNP genotyping and selection

Genomic DNA extraction from sheep ear tissue was performed by the phenol-chloroform method. The DNA was stored at −20°C. Genotyping of the Sheep 50 K SNP chips from Illumina Inc. was performed by DNA LandMarks Inc. (Quebec, Canada) using 75 µL of approximately 50 ng/µL genomic DNA. BeadStudio software with the genotyping module (Illumina, 2006) was used to determine the genotypes of the individuals used in the current study.

Following quality control, 47,286 SNPs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) of 5% or greater and call rates of 95% or greater were selected for use in this study. These SNPs were distributed across 26 autosomes and the X chromosome, with the number of SNPs per chromosome ranging from 640 to 5161, and with a mean distance between adjacent SNPs ranging from 53.4 to 100.7 kb (for details see Table S1). Individuals with 5% or more missing SNP genotypes were excluded.

Statistical analyses

SNP association analysis.

In this study, the statistical model was Y = μ+ Line + Year+ SNP + Animal +e, where Y was the phenotype value, Line was the strains effect, Year was ages of the animals when they were phenotyped on the traits studied, SNP was the SNP marker effect, Animal was a random animal effect to account for individual correlation, and e was the residual effect. Approximately 50% of the pedigree information was missing in this study population. So a genomic relationship inferred from the 50K SNP data can be inferred and reflect the similarity of paired individuals. Using the genome association and prediction integrated tool (GAPIT) [37] in R v3.0.3, we performed single marker mixed-model GWAS for each wool trait. The R package GAPIT was used to generate the matrix using the EMMA algorithm [41]. We use SNPEVG tool [42] to show the quantile-quantile plot and Manhattan plots for each GWAS result.

Statistical inference.

The Bonferroni method was used to adjust for multiple testing from the number of SNP loci detected. We declared a significant SNP at the genome-wide significance level if the raw P-value was <0.05/N, here N is the number of SNP loci tested in the analyses. In this study, for each trait, the threshold P-value for declaring genome-wide significance was (0.05)/47,286 = 1.06×10−6 = 10−5.97 (47,286 SNP markers).

Identification of candidate genes

Sheep transcripts and annotations were downloaded from the sheep UCSC database (build 3.0). In addition, the human-sheep comparative map and the syntenic regions annotations were also downloaded from the UCSC database.

Results and Discussion

The global view of P-values (in terms of - log(P-value)) for all SNP markers of each trait are represented by a Manhattan plot shown in Fig. 1. And the quantile-quantile plot for each GWAS result show in Fig. 2. The numbers of genome-wide significant SNPs detected for the four traits (fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, crimp) were 9, 3, 2 and 15, respectively, and the details of these significant SNPs, including their positions in the genome, the nearest known genes and the raw P-values, are given in Table 2. On the other hand, there were no significant SNPs for staple length traits.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Manhattan plot of genome-wide association analysis for five wool production Traits.

The horizontal solid line declares genome-wise 5% significance with a p-value threshold of 1.06×10−6. Fig. 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 1-D and 1-E refer to plots for fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, crimp and staple length trait, respectively. Red triangle refers to significant SNPs plots.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot of genome-wide association analysis for five wool production Traits.

Fig. 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D and 2-E refer to plots for fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion, crimp and staple length trait, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Genome-wise significant (p<0.05) SNPs for wool production traits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.t002

Fiber diameter

As shown in Table 2, there are 9 significant SNPs for fiber diameter, and they were distributed on seven autosomes. These SNPs were distributed unevenly among the chromosomes, and there were 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1 significant SNP markers associated with the fiber diameter trait on OAR1, OAR3, OAR4, OAR8, OAR9, OAR13 and OAR25, respectively. Furthermore, two significant SNPs on OAR13 concentrated in a region of 60 kb (17.16–17.22 Mb).

Four of the 9 significant SNP markers were located within known or predicted genes including the TSPEAR (Thrombospondin-type laminin G domain and EAR repeat), PIK3R4 (phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 4), KRTCAP3 (Keratinocyte-associated protein 3) and YWHAZ (of the 14-3-3 family of proteins) genes. The others were located 6.6 to 396.1 kb away from the nearest known gene.

The KRTCAP3 gene is expressed in skin keratinocytes [40]. Keratinocytes are the most common type of skin cells. They make keratin, a protein that provides strength to skin, hair and nails. In this study, marker s14929.1 on chromosome 3 was located within the KRTCAP3 gene.

The YWHAZ gene product belongs to the 14-3-3 family of proteins, which mediate signal transduction by binding to phosphoserine-containing proteins. The encoded protein interacts with the IRS1 protein, suggesting a role in regulating insulin sensitivity. The human YWHAZ gene, located on chromosome 8q22.3, is expressed in HNSCC (head and neck squamous cell carcinomas) cases. The YWHAZ mRNA is frequently upregulated in tumor tissues. Furthermore, the YWHAZ gene-specific RNAi significantly suppressed the growth rate of HNSCC cell lines, and overexpression of YWHAZ in HaCaT immortalized human skin keratinocytes promoted overgrowth, as well as morphological changes [38]. Reduced levels of YWHAZ increased the proportion of cells in G1/G0-phase, and decreased the proportion in S-phase and the rate of DNA synthesis. Consequently, Lin et al.. suggested that YWHAZ is a candidate proto-oncogene [38]. In this study, the marker OAR9_80743202.1 on chromosome 9 had the most significant association with the fiber diameter trait. This marker was located within the YWHAZ gene.

The CCNY gene controls cell division cycles and regulates cyclin-dependent kinases. Franke et al.. found that SNP marker rs3936503 in the CCNY gene on chromosome 10p11.2 was related to Crohn's disease, based on a sample of 1850 German Crohn's disease patients and 1,817 controls [39]. Crohn's disease is a type of inflammatory bowel disease that causes abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting or complications outside the gastrointestinal tract, such as skin rashes and arthritis. In this study, the SNPs (OAR13_19523580.1) on the ORA13, were located near the CCNY gene from 6.6 kb.

The functions of all of the above genes are directly or indirectly related to skin development. Hair follicles are skin appendages and produce hair; therefore, we hypothesize that these genes control hair follicle development and fiber diameter trait.

On chromosomes OAR1, OAR5, OAR6, OAR13 and OAR25, 7 QTLs were reported to be related to fiber diameter [1]. Of these QTLs, one QTL was located on OAR1, ranging from 277.8 to 293.1 cM [44]. In present study, an SNP marker (s73369.1) was located at 262.6 Mb on OAR1. Vitezica et al. (2007) identified one QTL on OAR13 at 94.1 cM, controlling fiber diameter trait in INRA 401 sheep [45]. In this study, we detected one SNP located in the 17.1 Mb regions on OAR13. Allain et al. (2006) identified one QTL on OAR25 at 6.4 cM, controlling fiber diameter trait in a sheep backcross SARDA and LACAUNE resource population [46]. Bidinost et al. (2006) identified one QTL on OAR25 at 52.6 cM, controlling fiber diameter trait in Merino sheep [47]. Ponz et al. (2001) identified one QTL on OAR25 at 68.3 cM, controlling fiber diameter trait in INRA 401 sheep [48]. In this study, we detected one SNP located in the 20.9 Mb regions on OAR25. Moreover there were one QTLs detected on OAR5 and OAR6, respectively [5], [48]. However, in this study, there were no significant SNP markers identified on these chromosomes.

Fiber diameter coefficient of variation

As shown in Table 2, three significant SNPs were distributed onOAR1, OAR10 and OAR13. Only one significant SNP was located KIF16B gene; the others were not located within known or predicted genes. SNP marker OAR1_293501261.1 on OAR1 is 141 bp downstream from the 3′ end of the closest gene, Mir563. Target gene search using TargetScan [43] showed Mir563 has 36 target genes in human, including FBN1 (fibrillin 1), KIAA0831 (for details see Mir563 target genes see Table S2).

There were one, one, two and three QTLs on OAR4, OAR7, OAR11, OAR25, respectively, related to fiber diameter coefficient of variation trait [44], [46][48]. However, in this study no significant SNPs markers were located on these chromosomes.

Fineness dispersion

As shown in Table 2, only two significant SNPs (OAR6_63321833.1 and s40917.1) were detected. These SNPs were located at OAR6 and OAR13, respectively. In addition, SNP markers s40917.1 was also significantly associated with fiber diameter coefficient of variation. That SNP marker was located within KIF16B gene (KIF16B kinesin family member 16B).

Staple length

No significant SNPs were detected for staple length trait. However, several papers have been published concerning detection of QTLs for the staple length trait, and seven were detected on chromosomes 3, 7, 14, 15, 18 and 25. Ponz et al.. typed 40 microsatellites covering 20 autosomes on the synthetic breed INRA401 population, which is a composite Romanov (prolific breed) and Berrichon du Cher (meat breed), and detected three QTLs on chromosomes 3, 7 and 25 related to staple length [48]. Allain et al.. suggested four putative QTLs for staple length on chromosomes 14, 15, 18 and 25 [46]. However, in the present study, no significant SNP markers were associated with these QTLs for staple length.

Crimp

Fifteen significant SNPs were detected (for details, see Table 2). These SNPs were distributed on OAR2, OAR3, OAR6, OAR9, OAR10, OAR11 and OAR23. The four significant SNPs concentrated in a region of 0.7 Mb (26.4–27.1 Mb) on chromosome 10. In addition, seven significant SNPs were located within known or predicted genes, including PTPN3 (Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 3), TCF9 (GC-rich sequence DNA-binding factor 2), GPRC5A (G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member A), DDX47 (DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) box polypeptide 47), EPHA5 (EPH receptor A5), TPTE2 (transmembrane phosphoinositide 3-phosphatase and tensin homolog) and NBEA (neurobeachin), and the other SNPs were located 26.2 kb to 379.1 kb away from the nearest known genes.

The GPRC5A gene is located on OAR3 from 201.83 Mb to 201.88 Mb. This gene encodes a member of the type 3 G protein-coupling receptor family, characterized by a characteristic 7-transmembrane domain motif. The encoded protein may be involved in the interaction between retinoid acid and G protein signaling pathways. This gene may be involved in modulating differentiation and maintaining homeostasis of epithelial cells [49]. In this study, markers s30057.1 within GPRC5A gene were significantly related to the crimp trait.

The EPHA5 gene, located on OAR6 from 80.71 Mb to 81.09 Mb, encodes a protein that belongs to the ephrin receptor subfamily of the protein-tyrosine kinase family. One SNP marker OAR5_43897574.1, which fall within this EPHA5 gene, was most significantly associated with the crimp trait. This SNP is 33.1 kb downstream from the 3′ end of the closest gene, SH3BP5L (SH3 domain-binding protein 5-like). The encoded protein SH3BP5L interacts with YWHAZ protein [50]. As mentioned before, the YWHAZ gene harbors the marker OAR9_80743202.1, which was significantly associated with sheep fiber diameter in this study.

As mentioned above, none of these genes plays an obvious role in the crimp trait. But, the functions of all of the above genes are directly or indirectly related to epithelial cells or skin development. So we presume these genes may be involved in determining the crimp trait. A future study will investigate the biological functions of these genes.

Conclusions

In the present study, we detected 28 genome-wide significant SNPs for fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, fineness dispersion and crimp trait in a Chinese Merino sheep (JunKen type) populations. Some significant SNP markers were located within previously reported candidate genes. However, most of the candidate genes and SNP markers, for the first time, were reported as related to wool production traits. Our findings lay the basis for follow-up replication studies, which will reveal the causal mutations underlying wool production traits in Merino sheep.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Distributions of SNPs after quality control and the average distances between adjacent SNPs on each chromosome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

All targeted genes by Mir563 in human.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107101.s002

(DOC)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NW HL. Performed the experiments: ZW HZ HY SW ER WP HL NW. Analyzed the data: ZW HL NW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HY. Wrote the paper: ZW SW HL NW.

References

  1. 1. Hu ZL, Park CA, Wu XL, Reecy JM (2012) Animal QTLdb: an improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue): : D871–9.
  2. 2. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2009) Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet 10: 381–391.
  3. 3. Andersson L, Georges M (2004) Domestic-animal genomics: deciphering the genetics of complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 5: 202–212.
  4. 4. Parsons YM, Piper LR, Cooper DW (1994) Linkage relationships between keratin-associated protein (KRTAP) genes and growth hormone in sheep. . Genomics 20(3): 500–2.
  5. 5. Zeng XC, Chen HY, Jia B, Zhao ZS, Hui WQ, et al. (2011) Identification of SNPs within the sheep PROP1 gene and their effects on wool traits. Mol Biol Rep 38(4): 2723–8.
  6. 6. Forrest RH, Itenge-Mweza TO, McKenzie GW, Zhou H, Frampton CM, et al. (2009) Polymorphism of the ovine beta3-adrenergic receptor gene (ADRB3) and its association with wool mean staple strength and yield. Anim Genet 40(6): 958–62.
  7. 7. Georges M (2007) Mapping, fine mapping, and molecular dissection of quantitative trait Loci in domestic animals. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 8: 131–162.
  8. 8. Daetwyler HD, Schenkel FS, Sargolzaei M, Robinson JA (2008) A genome scan to detect quantitative trait loci for economically important traits in Holstein cattle using two methods and a dense single nucleotide polymorphism map. J Dairy Sci 91: 3225–3236.
  9. 9. Kolbehdari D, Wang Z, Grant JR, Murdoch B, Prasad A, et al. (2009) A whole genome scan to map QTL for milk production traits and somatic cell score in Canadian Holstein bulls. J Anim Breed Genet 126: 216–227.
  10. 10. Maxa J, Neuditschko M, Russ I, Förster M, Medugorac I (2012) Genome-wide association mapping of milk production traits in Braunvieh cattle. J Dairy Sci 95(9): 5357–64.
  11. 11. Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Kemper KE, Hayes BJ, Zhang Y, et al. (2013) Detection of quantitative trait loci in Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle using genome-wide association studies. Genet Sel Evol 45(1): 43.
  12. 12. Saatchi M, Garrick DJ, Tait RG Jr, Mayes MS, Drewnoski M, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association and prediction of direct genomic breeding values for composition of fatty acids in Angus beef cattlea. BMC Genomics 14(1): 730.
  13. 13. Duijvesteijn N, Knol EF, Merks JW, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA, et al. (2010) A genome-wide association study on androstenone levels in pigs reveals a cluster of candidate genes on chromosome 6. BMC Genet 11: 42.
  14. 14. Nonneman DJ, Shackelford SD, King DA, Wheeler TL, Wiedmann RT, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association of meat quality traits and tenderness in swine. J Anim Sci 91(9): 4043–50.
  15. 15. Lu X, Liu J, Fu W, Zhou J, Luo Y, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study for cytokines and immunoglobulin g in Swine. PLoS One 8(10): e74846.
  16. 16. Abasht B, Lamont SJ (2007) Genome-wide association analysis reveals cryptic alleles as an important factor in heterosis for fatness in chicken F2 population. Anim Genet 38(5): 491–8.
  17. 17. Zhang H, Hu X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Wang S, et al. (2012) Selection signature analysis implicates the PC1/PCSK1 region for chicken abdominal fat content. PLoS One 7(7): e40736.
  18. 18. Wolc A, Arango J, Jankowski T, Settar P, Fulton JE, et al.. (2013) Genome-wide association study for Marek's disease mortality in layer chickens. Avian Dis 57(2 Suppl): : 395–400.
  19. 19. Danielle M, Gorbach BF, Onteru SK, Zhao X, Du ZQ, (2010) Genome-Wide Association Studies for Important Economic Traits in Domestic Animals Using High Density SNP Genotyping. Iowa State University Animal Industry Report.
  20. 20. Zhao X, Dittmer KE, Blair HT, Thompson KG, Rothschild MF, et al. (2011) A novel nonsense mutation in the DMP1 gene identified by a genome-wide association study is responsible for inherited rickets in Corriedale sheep. PLoS One 6(7): e21739.
  21. 21. Johnston SE, McEwan JC, Pickering NK, Kijas JW, Beraldi D, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association mapping identifies the genetic basis of discrete and quantitative variation in sexual weaponry in a wild sheep population. Mol Ecol 20(12): 2555–66.
  22. 22. García-Gámez E, Gutiérrez-Gil B, Sahana G, Sánchez JP, Bayón Y, et al. (2012) GWA analysis for milk production traits in dairy sheep and genetic support for a QTN influencing milk protein percentage in the LALBA gene. PLoS One 7(10): e47782.
  23. 23. Schröder W, Klostermann A, Stock KF, Distl O (2012) A genome-wide association study for quantitative trait loci of show-jumping in Hanoverian warmblood horses. Anim Genet 43(4): 392–400.
  24. 24. Kulbrock M, Lehner S, Metzger J, Ohnesorge B, Distl O (2013) A genome-wide association study identifies risk loci to equine recurrent uveitis in German warmblood horses. PLoS One 8(8): e71619.
  25. 25. Karlsson EK, Baranowska I, Wade CM, Salmon Hillbertz NH, Zody MC, et al. (2007) Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association. Nat Genet 39(11): 1321–8.
  26. 26. Safra N, Bassuk AG, Ferguson PJ, Aguilar M, Coulson RL, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association mapping in dogs enables identification of the homeobox gene, NKX2-8, as a genetic component of neural tube defects in humans. PLoS Genet 9(7): e1003646.
  27. 27. Wang WY, Barratt BJ, Clayton DG, Todd JA (2005) Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns. Nat Rev Genet 6(2): 109–18.
  28. 28. Maraganore DM, de Andrade M, Lesnick TG, Strain KJ, Farrer MJ, et al. (2005) High-resolution whole-genome association study of Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet 77(5): 685–93.
  29. 29. Duerr RH, Taylor KD, Brant SR, Rioux JD, Silverberg MS, et al. (2006) A genome-wide association study identifies IL23R as an inflammatory bowel disease gene. Science 314(5804): 1461–3.
  30. 30. Coon KD, Myers AJ, Craig DW, Webster JA, Pearson JV, et al. (2007) A high-density whole-genome association study reveals that APOE is the major susceptibility gene for sporadic late-onset al.zheimer's disease. J Clin Psychiatry 68: 613–618.
  31. 31. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, Li Y, et al. (2007) A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants. Science 316: 1341–1345.
  32. 32. Cheng CY, Schache M, Ikram MK, Young TL, Guggenheim JA, et al. (2013) Nine Loci for Ocular Axial Length Identified through Genome-wide Association Studies, Including Shared Loci with Refractive Error. Am J Hum Genet 93(2): 264–77.
  33. 33. Kou I, Takahashi Y, Johnson TA, Takahashi A, Guo L, et al. (2013) Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Genet 45(6): 676–9.
  34. 34. Wu C, Li D, Jia W, Hu Z, Zhou Y, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association study identifies common variants in SLC39A6 associated with length of survival in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 45(6): 632–8.
  35. 35. Deng M, Wei L, Zuo X, Tian Y, Xie F, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association analyses in Han Chinese identify two new susceptibility loci for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Genet 45(6): 697–700.
  36. 36. Zhang L, Liu J, Zhao F, Ren H, Xu L, et al. (2013) Genome-wide association studies for growth and meat production traits in sheep. PLoS One 8(6): e66569.
  37. 37. Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q, Peiffer J, Li M, et al. (2012) GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28: 2397–2399.
  38. 38. Lin M, Morrison CD, Jones S, Mohamed N, Bacher J, et al. (2009) Copy number gain and oncogenic activity of YWHAZ/14-3-3zeta in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 125(3): 603–11.
  39. 39. Franke A, Balschun T, Karlsen TH, Hedderich J, May S, et al. (2008) Replication of signals from recent studies of Crohn's disease identifies previously unknown disease loci for ulcerative colitis. Nature Genet 40: 713–715.
  40. 40. Bonkobara M, Das A, Takao J, Cruz PD, Ariizumi K (2003) Identification of novel genes for secreted and membrane-anchored proteins in human keratinocytes. Br J Dermatol 148(4): 654–64.
  41. 41. Kang HM, Zaitlen NA, Wade CM, Kirby A, Heckerman D, et al. (2008) Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178: 1709–1723.
  42. 42. Wang S, Dvorkin D, Da Y (2012) SNPEVG: a graphical tool for GWAS graphing with mouse clicks. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 319.
  43. 43. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 14 120(1): 15–20.
  44. 44. Roldan DL, Dodero AM, Bidinost F, Taddeo HR, Allain D, et al. (2010) Merino sheep: a further look at quantitative trait loci for wool production. Animal 4(8): 1330–40.
  45. 45. Vitezica ZG, Moreno CR, Lantier F, Lantier I, Schibler L, et al. (2007) Quantitative trait loci linked to PRNP gene controlling health and production traits in INRA 401 sheep. Genet Sel Evol 39(4): 421–30.
  46. 46. Allain D, Schibler L, Mura L, Barillet F, Sechi T, et al.. (2006) QTL detection with DNA markers for wool traits in a sheep backcross SARDA X LACAUNE resource population. 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
  47. 47. Bidinost F, Roldan DL, Dodero AM, Cano EM, Taddeo HR, et al.. (2006) Quantitative trait loci related to Merino sheep wool quality, 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production.
  48. 48. Ponz R, Moreno C, Allain D, Elsen JM, Lantier F, et al. (2001) Assessment of genetic variation explained by markers for wool traits in sheep via a segment mapping approach. Mamm Genome 12(7): 569–72.
  49. 49. Fujimoto J, Kadara H, Garcia MM, Kabbout M, Behrens C, et al. (2012) G-protein coupled receptor family C, group 5, member A (GPRC5A) expression is decreased in the adjacent field and normal bronchial epithelia of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7(12): 1747–54.
  50. 50. Jin J, Smith FD, Stark C, Wells CD, Fawcett JP, et al. (2004) Proteomic, functional, and domain-based analysis of in vivo 14-3-3 binding proteins involved in cytoskeletal regulation and cellular organization. Curr Biol 14(16): 1436–50.