Figures
Abstract
Birth weight of a child is an important indicator of its vulnerability for childhood illness and chances of survival. A large number of infant deaths can be averted by appropriate management of low birth weight babies and prevention of factors associated with low birth weight. The prevalence of low birth weight babies in Nepal is estimated to be about 12-32%.Our study aimed at identifying major determinants of low birth weight among term babies in Nepal. A hospital-based retrospective case control study was conducted in maternity ward of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital from February to July 2011. A total of 155 LBW babies and 310 controls were included in the study. Mothers admitted to maternity ward during the study period were interviewed, medical records were assessed and anthropometric measurements were done. Risk factors, broadly classified into proximal and distal factors, were assessed for any association with birth of low-birth weight babies. Regression analysis revealed that a history of premature delivery (adjusted odds ratio; aOR5.24, CI 1.05-26.28), hard physical work during pregnancy (aOR1.48, CI 0.97-2.26), younger age of mother (aOR1.98, CI 1.15-3.41), mothers with haemoglobin level less than 11gm/dl (aOR0.51, CI0.24-1.07) and lack of consumption of nutritious food during pregnancy (aOR1.99, CI 1.28-3.10) were significantly associated with the birth of LBW babies. These factors should be addressed with appropriate measures so as to decrease the prevalence of low birth weight among term babies in Nepal.
Citation: Sharma SR, Giri S, Timalsina U, Bhandari SS, Basyal B, Wagle K, et al. (2015) Low Birth Weight at Term and Its Determinants in a Tertiary Hospital of Nepal: A Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123962
Academic Editor: Olivier Baud, Hôpital Robert Debré, FRANCE
Received: February 22, 2014; Accepted: March 9, 2015; Published: April 8, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Sharma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Birth weight is an important determinant of an infant’s survival and future development [1]. Low birth weight (LBW) is defined as weight less than 2500 grams at birth regardless of gestational age. LBW puts a newborn at increased risk of death and illness [2–6] and limits their growth potential in the adulthood [7–9]. Globally, LBW contributes to 40–60% of newborn mortality [10]. LBW can be caused by preterm birth or by intrauterine growth restriction. The latter group is also referred to as small for gestational age (SGA) babies. In developing countries from Asia, LBW is largely attributed to intrauterine growth retardation as compared to prematurity in developed and African countries [11,12]. In Nepal, studies have shown that the prevalence of LBW ranges from 11.9% to 39.6% [13–15]. A multi-hospital based study in Nepal estimated the overall prevalence of LBW to be 27% out of which only 30% were preterm [16].
Prior studies from the Indian subcontinent have identified several socio-economic factors in addition to gestational age and maternal health as risk factors for SGA babies in this region [16–18]. However, studies from Nepal have inadequately addressed the socio-economic factors associated with the birth of LBW babies [19–23]. Many of these studies are based on retrospective chart review that often lack information such as physical work during pregnancy [19,21–23], nutritious food intake [19,21–23] and nutritional supplementation [22], illness during pregnancy [21,22] and household income [19]. Also, these studies have studied LBW babies in general and not separately analyzed the SGA group, even though previous literature has suggested different risk factors for pre-term LBW and SGA babies [24]. To fill the information gap about factors associated with LBW in term babies, we designed the present study in an attempt to identify proximate and distal factors associated with LBW in Nepal.
Methods
A retrospective case-control study design was used. The study was conducted in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), one of the largest tertiary hospitals in Kathmandu, Nepal. Cases were identified as newborn babies with birth weight less than 2500 grams whereas controls were newborn babies with a birth weight of more than or equal to 2500 grams. Our study population included singleton newborn babies at term without any congenital diseases. The study was limited to SGA babies at term only. Unlike in developed countries, majority of LBW babies in the developing countries are small for gestational age due to intrauterine growth retardation, which has been associated with a variety of socio-economic and maternal risk factors [11,12,16].
A total of 155 eligible consecutive cases of LBW babies at term were admitted to TUTH between February 2011 and July 2011. Age and sex matching with two controls was done on the same day when a case was found. Whenever there were more than 2 eligible controls for a case, controls were randomly selected. A total of 310 controls were selected. The non-selected controls were included for other cases on the same day if it met the inclusion criteria (i.e. age and sex matched). Due to high volume of deliveries, controls for a case were found on the same day. The number of cases and controls was calculated by taking power at 80%, odds ratio of 1.8, two sided significant level at 0.05 and proportion of controls with exposure as 0.25 using Epi Info (Version 3.5.2).
The data was collected by interviewing the mothers, observing medical records of the newborn and measuring their anthropometry. Birth weight was measured by the study investigators using a digital non-hanging type salter scale and rounded to the nearest 10 grams. The instrument was calibrated each time before use with a standard 1 kilogram weight. Data were collected by medical and public health students who were properly oriented on data collection techniques by the principle investigator. A structured questionnaire was adapted from previous study by WHO in South-East Asia region and other studies conducted in this region. The tools were pretested during the month of January in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital itself in five percent of the sample. The ratio of cases and controls in pretesting was 1:1. Necessary amendments were made and measuring tools were checked properly prior to data collection. Thus collected data was reviewed, edited and re-coded. The study was ethically approved by Institutional Ethical Review Board of Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine. Respondents were clearly explained about the objective and voluntary nature of the study. Written consent was taken from the respondents and their guardians prior to the interview. Participants were explained about their right to refuse participation and withdraw from the study.
Explanatory variables
The explanatory variables were divided into proximate and distal factors. The proximate factors included history of chronic medical illness, history of abortion, history of premature delivery, hard physical work during pregnancy, illness during current pregnancy, age of mother, parity, height of mother, haemoglobin level, the practices of taking iron tablets, consuming nutritious food (beans, greens or meat) daily, drinking alcohol during pregnancy and antenatal care (ANC) visits during last pregnancy. Chronic medical illness was defined as a pre-existing medical illness of the mother that was documented in the medical record of TUTH with an onset prior to the current pregnancy. Regular physical work during pregnancy was identified as moderate or hard. Hard physical work comprised of three or more of the following listed works: daily household chores, fetching water with large buckets, lifting heavy loads, chopping woods, cutting grass for cattle feeding and washing clothes/utensils for long. These works have been accounted under hard physical activity in a study among rural women in India [25]. On the other hand, illness during current pregnancy was defined as a medical condition that developed during current pregnancy for which medical attention or treatment was sought. This included pregnancy related medical illnesses and complications based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th revision [26]. The age of mother was defined as the current completed age in years. Age of mothers was categorized into less than 20 years, 20 to 30 years and more than 30 years based on a prior study [27]. Parity was categorized into primiparous (mothers with a single living child) and multiparous (mothers with more than one living children). Similarly, mothers were placed into two groups on the basis of their height; less than146 cm and 146 cm or more.
Participants were categorized into two groups based on haemoglobin level; one with haemoglobin level less than 11gm/dL and the other with haemoglobin level 11gm/dL or more based on a prior study [28]. The iron intake frequency of mothers was classified as intake for a period of three months or more and less than three months. Number of ANC visit was classified on the basis of minimum recommended visits i.e. having four or more visits and less than four visits.
The distal factors included education and occupation status of the parents, ethnicity, place of residence, type of family and income of the family. Parental educational status was grouped as illiterate, primary, lower-secondary, secondary, intermediate, bachelors and above. They were further categorized into primary level or less and secondary or above. Occupations of the parents were categorized into five groups; agriculture, service, business, household works and others. These occupations are grouped into either labor intensive or non-labor intensive groups. Labour intensive occupation included more physical works under lower positions and with comparatively less wages. Ethnicity of the mother was first categorized into six major ethnic groups (Brahmin/Chhetri, advantaged Janajati, disadvantaged Janajati, Other excluded Terai group, Religious minorities and Dalit) as per the classification of the Health Management Information System of Ministry of Health/Nepal [29]. In the second step, they were grouped into two as advantaged and disadvantaged group. Brahmin, Chhetri, and advantaged Janajati were grouped into advantaged ethnic group whereas other excluded Terai group, religious minorities, disadvantaged Janajati and Dalit were grouped into disadvantaged ethnic group. This grouping was based on socio-economic and educational difference among these ethnic groups [30]. Place of residence was classified as rural and urban. Type of family was categorized into three groups; nuclear, joint and extended. A nuclear family was defined as mother, father and children living together, whereas joint family was defined as all first-degree blood relatives of many generations living under the same roof. An extended family, on the other hand, was defined as a family extending beyond the immediate family of parents and their children. The yearly income of the family was hypothetically divided into two levels as more than NRs 240,000 and NRs 240,000 or less. The socio-demographic information was recorded based on face-to-face interview with mothers.
Statistical methods
The data was entered in Epi info (Version 3.5.2)and analyzed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Version 17). Bivariate analysis was first conducted with chi-squared test to assess the differences of the various proximal and distal factors between the cases versus the controls (see Table 1 and Table 2). All variables with p-value less than 0.1 (90% level of significance) in bivariate analysis were considered for multivariate logistic regression analysis. Backward stepwise logistic regression method was used to enter the predictive factors in logistic regression model. The level of significance for regression analysis was set at 95%. All p values were two sided.
Results
A total of 155 cases and 310 controls were studied. Tables 1 and 2 show the distribution of cases and controls as per proximate and distal factors respectively.
Chronic medical illness was present only in a small percentage of the study population. Majority of the mothers had no prior history of abortion or premature delivery. Engaging in hard physical work during pregnancy was fairly common (46% and 33% among cases and controls respectively). Majority of mothers belonged to age 20 to 29 years (69% among cases and 75% among controls), had a height of 146 cm or more (89% among cases and 94% among controls). More than 90% of both groups were taking iron supplements since at least 3 months. Majority of mothers (93% cases and 87% controls) had their haemoglobin level less than 11gm/dl. Alcohol intake during pregnancy was fairly low (0.6% and 1.3% respectively) and majority of mothers had an ANC visit of at least 4 times (96.8% and 93.5% respectively) as in Table 1. Among the distal factors (Table 2), majority of mothers had at least secondary level of education (86% and 81% respectively), belonged to an advantaged ethnicity (89% and 81% respectively) and urban residence (97% and 96% respectively). Similarly 57.4% of the cases and 63.2% of the controls had a yearly income of less than NRs 240,000 or less.
Determinants of LBW
Results of the bivariate (Tables 1 and 2) and the multivariate analysis (Table 3) to study the association between different risk factors and the occurrence of LBW have been summarized on Tables 1–3. In bivariate analysis, history of premature delivery, hard physical work done during pregnancy, current age of mother, height of mother, haemoglobin level, consuming nutritious food during pregnancy, ethnicity and family type were significantly associated with LBW at 90% level of significance (p-value 0.1). These variables were then subjected to the multivariable analysis using backward stepwise logistic regression method (Table 3). History of premature delivery (aOR5.24, CI 1.05–26.28, hard physical work during pregnancy (aOR1.48, CI 0.97–2.26), younger age of mother (aOR1.98, CI 1.15–3.41), mothers with haemoglobin level less than 11gm/dl (aOR0.51, CI 0.24–1.07) and consumption of nutritious food during pregnancy (aOR1.99, CI 1.28–3.10) were the determinants of LBW, found significantly associated in multivariate analysis.
Discussion
Based on the findings of the present study, history of premature delivery, hard physical work during pregnancy, earlier age at pregnancy, lack of consumption of nutritious food during pregnancy and maternal anemia were the independent risk factors for the birth of SGA babies in Nepal.
Our study revealed that a history of premature delivery was significantly associated with LBW in babies. A study by Singh et al in Ahemdabad, India also showed similar findings [31]. A highly significant association of history of premature delivery with LBW in this study indicated that mothers with history of premature delivery may need special care during pregnancy in terms of diet and health check-up.
Hard physical work during pregnancy was found to be significantly associated with LBW in this study. A greater proportion of LBW babies were born to mothers who had done hard physical work during pregnancy. A study from Lithuania depicted similar findings that hard manual work by mothers attributed to greater percent of LBW cases [32]. Agarwal et al also showed similar relationship between physical work of mother and LBW [33]. Lifting heavy loads during pregnancy has been shown to be one of the risk factors for low birth weight [34]. One mechanism suggested involves placental hypoxia leading to low birth weight babies, particularly among undernourished women [25]. Frequency and duration of rest taken by pregnant women plays a significant role in determining birth weight [35].
Many studies have shown age of the mother to be significantly associated with the birth of LBW babies [33,36–41]. Previous studies have shown that younger mothers are more likely to have LBW babies [32,42]. The current study showed that young mothers (less than 20 years of age) were nearly two times more likely to deliver LBW babies compared to older mothers. Efforts towards preventing early marriage would contribute significantly in reducing the prevalence of low birth weight.
The current study well found mother’s level of haemoglobin to be associated with LBW. Lower concentration of maternal haemoglobin is one of the risk factors for LBW among children [43,44]. Maternal anaemia further limits maternal oxygen uptake, decrease oxygen delivery to fetus [45] and consequently leads to fetal growth restriction [46,47]. Various studies have previously depicted that anemic mothers with haemoglobin level less than 11gm/dl have higher chances of giving birth to LBW babies [48–50].
The study also found that consumption of nutritious diet during pregnancy affects the birth weight, a well-established fact [51–54]. Poor maternal food intake leads to fetal under-nutrition and deficiency of several micronutrients which are necessary for the growth and development of fetus [55,56]. This finding implicates that the prevalence of low birth weight can be reduced by promoting consumption of meat, beans and green vegetables by pregnant mothers and mitigating food related taboos.
This study however had some notable limitations. The findings might be influenced by purposive selection of study area, study design bias and social-desirability bias. Use of hospital records for background information may have introduced some bias. The study was based on a single tertiary institution limiting its generalizability. In a country with proportion of home deliveries about 65% [57], a community based study may provide more clear picture on the determinants of low birth weight. Also, we did not evaluate other potential risk factors for low birth weight including micronutrient deficiencies among mothers, urinary tract or genital infections, cigarette smoking, other toxic exposures, and the quality of antenatal care received by the mothers, which may have affected our results [58].
Conclusions
History of premature delivery, hard physical work during pregnancy, younger age at pregnancy, mother’s lower haemoglobin level and lack of nutritious diet consumption during pregnancy were the major determinants of low birth weight among term babies in Nepal. Public health programs should focus on raising awareness on avoiding early marriage and pregnancy of females. Moreover, it should provide emphasis on adequate rest and nutrition during pregnancy in order to decrease the prevalence of low birth weight. Provision of a more intensive ANC to mothers with a history of premature deliveries can be another important strategy to prevent low birth weight babies. The role of family members is important especially in fulfilling the nutritional and health care needs of the pregnant mothers along with supporting her to take adequate rest in the cultural context of Nepal.
Acknowledgments
Authors would like to acknowledge the participants of the study and staff of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital who supported us during data collection.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: SRS SG. Performed the experiments: UT SSB BB LS. Analyzed the data: SRS KW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SRS SG UT SSB BB LS. Wrote the paper: SRS KW.
References
- 1. Wilcox AJ (2001) On the importance—and the unimportance—of birthweight. International Journal of Epidemiology 30: 1233–1241. pmid:11821313
- 2. Ashworth A (1998) Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on mortality and morbidity in infants and young children. Eur J Clin Nutr 52 Suppl 1: S34–41; discussion S41–32. pmid:9511018
- 3. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ (1999) Birth Weight in Relation to Morbidity and Mortality among Newborn Infants. New England Journal of Medicine 340: 1234–1238. pmid:10210706
- 4. Lira PI, Ashworth A, Morris SS (1996) Low birth weight and morbidity from diarrhea and respiratory infection in northeast Brazil. J Pediatr 128: 497–504. pmid:8618183
- 5. Read JS, Clemens JD (1995) Low birthweight as a determinant of infectious disease mortality: a methodological evaluation. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 9: 351–362. pmid:7479283
- 6. Victora CG, Smith PG, Vaughan JP, Nobre LC, Lombardi C, et al. (1989) Infant feeding and deaths due to diarrhea. A case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 129: 1032–1041. pmid:2705424
- 7. Albertsson-Wikland K, Karlberg J (1994) Natural growth in children born small for gestational age with and without catch-up growth. Acta Pædiatrica 83: 64–70.
- 8. Aylward GP, Pfeiffer SI, Wright A, Verhulst SJ (1989) Outcome studies of low birth weight infants published in the last decade: a metaanalysis. J Pediatr 115: 515–520. pmid:2795341
- 9. Casey PH, Kraemer HC, Bernbaum J, Yogman MW, Sells JC (1991) Growth status and growth rates of a varied sample of low birth weight, preterm infants: A longitudinal cohort from birth to three years of age. The Journal of pediatrics 119: 599–605. pmid:1919893
- 10.
UNICEF (2009) The state of the world's children 2009: maternal and newborn health: United Nations Children's Fund.
- 11. Villar J, Belizan JM (1982) The relative contribution of prematurity and fetal growth retardation to low birth weight in developing and developed societies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 143: 793–798. pmid:7102746
- 12. Villar J, Khoury MJ, Finucane FF, Delgado HL (1986) Differences in the epidemiology of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation. Early Human Development 14: 307–320. pmid:3803275
- 13. Kayastha S, Tuladhar H (2007) Study of low birth weight babies in Nepal Medical College. Nepal Med Coll J 9: 266–269. pmid:18298018
- 14.
World Health Organization (2000) Multicentre study on low birth weight and infant mortality in India, Nepal and Srilanka. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia.
- 15. Christian P, Murray-Kolb LE, Tielsch JM, Katz J, LeClerq SC, et al. (2014) Associations between preterm birth, small-for-gestational age, and neonatal morbidity and cognitive function among school-age children in Nepal. BMC Pediatr 14: 58. pmid:24575933
- 16.
MIRA/UNICEF Nepal (2000) Low Birth Weight Prevalence and Associated Factors in Four Regions of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Mother Infant Research Activities (MIRA), UNICEF.
- 17. Badshah S, Mason L, McKelvie K, Payne R, Lisboa PJ (2008) Risk factors for low birthweight in the public-hospitals at Peshawar, NWFP-Pakistan. BMC Public Health 8: 197. pmid:18533023
- 18. Mavalankar DV, Gray RH, Trivedi CR (1992) Risk factors for preterm and term low birthweight in Ahmedabad, India. Int J Epidemiol 21: 263–272. pmid:1428479
- 19. Acharya PP, Alpass F (2004) Birth outcomes across ethnic groups of women in Nepal. Health Care for Women International 25: 40–54. pmid:14742109
- 20. Sreeramareddy C, Chuni N, Patil R, Singh D, Shakya B (2008) Anthropometric surrogates to identify low birth weight Nepalese newborns: a hospital-based study. BMC Pediatrics 8: 16. pmid:18439237
- 21. Khanal V, Zhao Y, Sauer K (2014) Role of antenatal care and iron supplementation during pregnancy in preventing low birth weight in Nepal: comparison of national surveys 2006 and 2011. Arch Public Health 72: 4. pmid:24499636
- 22. Karkee R, Lee AH, Binns CW, Khanal V, Pokharel PK (2015) Incidence of low birthweight in central Nepal: a community-based prospective cohort study. Matern Child Health J 19: 1–5. pmid:24740722
- 23. Khanal V, Sauer K, Karkee R, Zhao Y (2014) Factors associated with small size at birth in Nepal: further analysis of Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14: 32. pmid:24438693
- 24. Lang JM, Lieberman E, Cohen A (1996) A comparison of risk factors for preterm labor and term small-for-gestational-age birth. Epidemiology 7: 369–376. pmid:8793362
- 25. Agarwal S, Agarwal A, Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Bansal A (2001) Physical activity and pregnancy outcome in rural undernourished women. Indian pediatrics 38: 1017–1022. pmid:11568377
- 26.
World Health Organization (1993) International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision. Geneva: WHO. 129–130 p.
- 27. Reichman NE, Pagnini DL (1997) Maternal age and birth outcomes: data from New Jersey. Fam Plann Perspect 29: 268–272, 295. pmid:9429872
- 28. Dim CC, Onah HE (2007) The prevalence of anemia among pregnant women at booking in Enugu, South Eastern Nigeria. MedGenMed 9: 11. pmid:18311361
- 29. Bhandari R, Sharma R (2012) Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a descriptive study in the mid-western region of Nepal. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 7: 253–257. pmid:22563245
- 30.
Bennett L, Dahal DR, Govindasamy P (2008) Caste, Ethnic and Regional Identity in Nepal: Further Analysis of the 2006 NDHS. Claverton, Maryland, USA.
- 31.
Singh S, Shrestha S, Marahatta S (2011) Incidence and risk factors of low birth weight babies born in Dhulikhel Hospital.
- 32. Dickute J, Padaiga Z, Grabauskas V, Gaizauskiene A, Basys V, et al. (2002) Do maternal social factors, health behavior and work conditions during pregnancy increase the risk of low birth weight in Lithuania? Medicina (Kaunas) 38: 321–332. pmid:12474706
- 33. Agarwal A, Agarwal K, Agrawal P, Agrawal V, Chaudhary V (2011) Prevalence and determinants of "low birth weight" among institutional deliveries. 48–52 p.
- 34. Fourn L, Ducic S, Seguin L (1999) Factors associated with low birth weight: a multivariate analysis. Sante 9: 7–11. pmid:10210796
- 35. Choudhary AK, Choudhary A, Tiwari SC, Dwivedi R (2013) Factors associated with low birth weight among newborns in an urban slum community in Bhopal. Indian J Public Health 57: 20–23. pmid:23649138
- 36. Amin N, Abel R, Sampathkumar V (1993) Maternal risk factors associated with low birth weight. Indian J Pediatr 60: 269–274. pmid:8244503
- 37. Khatun S, Rahman M (2008) Socio-economic determinants of low birth weight in Bangladesh: a multivariate approach. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 34: 81–86. pmid:19476252
- 38. Moraes AB, Zanini RR, Riboldi J, Giugliani ER (2012) Risk factors for low birth weight in Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil: classical and multilevel analysis. Cad Saude Publica 28: 2293–2305. pmid:23288062
- 39. Valero De Bernabe J, Soriano T, Albaladejo R, Juarranz M, Calle ME, et al. (2004) Risk factors for low birth weight: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 116: 3–15. pmid:15294360
- 40. Yadav H, Lee N (2013) Maternal factors in predicting low birth weight babies. Med J Malaysia 68: 44–47. pmid:23466766
- 41. Deshmukh JS, Motghare DD, Zodpey SP, Wadhva SK (1998) Low birth weight and associated maternal factors in an urban area. Indian Pediatr 35: 33–36. pmid:9707902
- 42. Phung H, Bauman A, Nguyen TV, Young L, Tran M, et al. (2003) Risk factors for low birth weight in a socio-economically disadvantaged population: parity, marital status, ethnicity and cigarette smoking. Eur J Epidemiol 18: 235–243. pmid:12800948
- 43. Sekhavat L, Davar R, Hosseinidezoki S (2011) Relationship between maternal hemoglobin concentration and neonatal birth weight. Hematology 16: 373–376. pmid:22183073
- 44. Rasmussen K (2001) Is There a Causal Relationship between Iron Deficiency or Iron-Deficiency Anemia and Weight at Birth, Length of Gestation and Perinatal Mortality? J Nutr 131: 590S–601S; discussion 601S–603S. pmid:11160592
- 45. Hutter D, Kingdom J, Jaeggi E (2010) Causes and Mechanisms of Intrauterine Hypoxia and Its Impact on the Fetal Cardiovascular System: A Review. International Journal of Pediatrics 2010: 9.
- 46. Ream M, Ray AM, Chandra R, Chikaraishi DM (2008) Early fetal hypoxia leads to growth restriction and myocardial thinning. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 295: R583–595. pmid:18509101
- 47. Mahajan SD, Singh S, Shah P, Gupta N, Kochupillai N (2004) Effect of maternal malnutrition and anemia on the endocrine regulation of fetal growth. Endocr Res 30: 189–203. pmid:15473129
- 48. Levy A, Fraser D, Katz M, Mazor M, Sheiner E Maternal anemia during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low birthweight and preterm delivery. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 122: 182–186. pmid:16219519
- 49. Elhassan E, Abbaker A, Haggaz A, Abubaker M, Adam I (2010) Anaemia and low birth weight in Medani, Hospital Sudan. BMC Research Notes 3: 181. pmid:20584294
- 50. Ahmad MO, Kalsoom U, Sughra U, Hadi U, Imran M (2011) Effect of maternal anaemia on birth weight. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 23: 77–79. pmid:22830153
- 51. Abu-Saad K, Fraser D (2010) Maternal Nutrition and Birth Outcomes. Epidemiologic Reviews 32: 5–25. pmid:20237078
- 52. Gresham E, Byles JE, Bisquera A, Hure AJ (2014) Effects of dietary interventions on neonatal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 100: 1298–1321. pmid:25332328
- 53. Kramer MS (1987) Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65: 663. pmid:3322602
- 54. Susser M, Stein Z, Pasamanick B (1975) Maternal nutrition and low birth-weight. The Lancet 306: 1145.
- 55. King JC (2003) The risk of maternal nutritional depletion and poor outcomes increases in early or closely spaced pregnancies. J Nutr 133: 1732s–1736s. pmid:12730491
- 56. Caroline HDF, S. YC , Rao S, Davies AA, Brown N, et al. (2003) Micronutrients and Fetal Growth. The Journal of Nutrition 133: 1747S–1756S. pmid:12730494
- 57.
Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP) [Nepal], New ERA, ICF International Inc. (2011) Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP) [Nepal], New ERA and ICF International Inc.
- 58. Kramer MS (1987) Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ 65: 663–737. pmid:3322602