Figures
Abstract
Hydroxyacid dehydrogenases are responsible for the conversion of 2-keto acids to 2-hydroxyacids and have a wide range of biotechnological applications. In this study, a D-lactate dehydrogenase (D-LDH) from a Sporolactobacillus inulinus strain was experimentally verified to have both the D-LDH and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activities (reversible deamination). The catalytic mechanism was demonstrated by identification of key residues from the crystal structure analysis and site-directed mutagenesis. The Arg234 and Gly79 residues of this enzyme play a significant role in both D-LDH and GDH activities. His295 and Phe298 in DLDH744 were identified to be key residues for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity only whereas Tyr101 is a unique residue that is critical for GDH activity. Characterization of the biochemical properties contributes to understanding of the catalytic mechanism of this novel D-lactate dehydrogenase enzyme.
Citation: Zhu L, Xu X, Wang L, Dong H, Yu B (2015) The D-Lactate Dehydrogenase from Sporolactobacillus inulinus Also Possessing Reversible Deamination Activity. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0139066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139066
Editor: Willem J.H. van Berkel, Wageningen University, NETHERLANDS
Received: July 6, 2015; Accepted: September 7, 2015; Published: September 23, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170116 & 31300601) and the PUMC Youth Fund (33320140186). BY is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Hydroxyacid dehydrogenases are responsible for stereospecific conversion of 2-keto acids to 2-hydroxyacids [1, 2]. Given the wide range of biotechnological applications in industry [3, 4, 5, 6], it is of significant biological interest to gain in-depth insights into the enzymes. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), one of the hydroxyacid dehydrogenases, is a terminal glycolytic enzyme. It catalyzes the (reversible) reduction of pyruvate to lactic acid, concomitant with the oxidation of NADH to NAD+ [2]. A hydride ion is transferred from NADH to pyruvate during this reaction; reversely, it is transferred to NAD+ from lactate. A unifying feature of all previously reported lactate dehydrogenases is their strict specificity for NAD+ as a cofactor [7].
Glutamate dehydrogenases (GDHs) are found in nearly every organism and play a fundamental role in nitrogen and carbon metabolism [8]. In the oxidative deamination reaction, GDH links amino acid metabolism to the tricarboxylic acid cycle by converting L-glutamate to 2-oxoglutarate (α-ketoglutarate), whereas the reductive amination reaction supplies nitrogen for several biosynthetic pathways [9]. GDH belongs to the amino acid dehydrogenase superfamily, members of which display differential substrate specificity as well as valine, leucine and phenylalanine dehydrogenases [8]. Bacterial glutamate dehydrogenases vary in their coenzyme preference: NAD+ specificity, NADP+ specificity, and a few which have dual cofactor specificity [10].
There are rare reports about the bifunctional activities of a lactate dehydrogenase. Vancomycin resistance proteins H (VanH) in the D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family is the only reported bifunctional enzyme that has additionally D-lactate dehydrogenase activity in nature [11]. We previously reported that a novel D-lactate dehydrogenase from Sporolactobacillus inulinus CASD (DLDH744) could use both NADH and NADPH and even with a preference for NADPH as the coenzyme, which is different from the coenzyme utilization of all previously reported LDHs [12]. Here, the DLDH744 was also experimentally proven to possess both D-lactate and glutamate dehydrogenase activities. The structure-guided mutagenesis study was applied to demonstrate the catalytic mechanism of this novel enzyme.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial strains and protein expression
S. inulinus CASD was used as the source for cloning DLDH744 gene [13]. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium aerobically and set on a rotary shaker. E. coli DH5α (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used for general cloning, while E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used for protein expression. Plasmids pMD 19-T (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and pET-28a(+) (Novagen) were used as vectors. The gene expression, protein purification, X-ray crystallography and structure determination were as previously described [12].
Enzymatic activity assay procedures
After purification, the activity of glutamate dehydrogenase was assayed photometrically (absorbance at 340 nm) following NAD(P)H production according to the formula, glutamate+ NAD(P)+ + H2O ↔ á-ketoglutarate + NAD(P)H + NH4+. The assay mixture (400 μL) contained 100 mM PBS (pH 5.5), 10 mM glutamate, 0.2 mM NAD(P)+, and 20 μL of enzyme [14]. The reverse reaction assay mixture (400 μL) contained 100 mM PBS (pH 5.5), 10 mM á-ketoglutarate, 10 mM NH4Cl, 0.2 mM NAD(P)H, and 20 μL of enzyme. The protein concentration of the enzyme stock solution was 3 mg/mL. One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme converting 1 μmol of NAD(P)H per min. Specific activity has been expressed as units per mg protein.
Kinetic studies of DLDH744
The kinetic constants of purified enzyme were calculated using 10 μg DLDH744 enzyme in 100 mM PBS (pH 5.5) at 30°C. NADH or NADPH was used as cofactor with the concentration of 0.2 mM. The concentrations of pyruvate, phenylpyruvate and glutamate used were measured from 0.5 mM to 20 mM, respectively. The ΔOD340 between 1 min and 2 min were chosen as the initial rate for kinetic analysis. The resulting kinetic parameters were calculated from multiple measurements and extracted by using ChemSWTM software.
Site-directed mutagenesis
The mutant strains used in this study were constructed by site-directed PCR mutagenesis using Pyrobest DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) [15]. The primers used for the introduction of the mutations are shown in Table 1. After the PCR reaction, the remaining template was digested with the restriction enzyme DpnI (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) at 37°C for 2 h. The DpnI-digested PCR product was then purified and transformed to E. coli BL21(DE3) for gene expression. The cells were spread on LB agar plates containing 30 μg/mL kanamycin. Single clones were selected for identification using gene sequencing.
Phylogenetic analysis
The sequences of all the members belonging to the D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family and the structurally similar NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase, phosphate dehydrogenase and L-alanine dehydrogenase were selected for the phylogenetic analysis. The resulting 40 sequences along with the sequence of DLDH744 were aligned using the multiple sequence alignment program ClustalX2 [16]. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted by using MEGA6 software with full-length amino acid sequences. The neighbor-joining method was used to draw phylogenetic tree.
Analytical methods
Glutamic acid was measured by HPLC (Agilent 1260 series) equipped with an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) and a variable-wavelength detector at 205 nm. The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM KH2PO4 (pH 2.5) and acetonitrile at a ratio of 95:5 (v/v) and a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min at 30°C.
Results
Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity of DLDH744
DLDH744 is a homodimeric protein with a length of 335 amino acids. The enzyme was confirmed to be a typical D-lactate dehydrogenase based on the activity detected with substrate pyruvate and coenzyme NAD(P)H [12]. The apparent Km value for pyruvate was determined to be 3.4 ± 0.02 mM with a kcat value of 512.2 ± 7.6 /min in this study. Upon submission of the draft genome sequence of S. inulinus strain CASD to NCBI database, the gene fragment of DLDH744 was predicted to be a bifunctional enzyme with the possible amino acid dehydrogenase activities. Therefore, we tested DLDH744 activity for various amino acids, including glutamate, aspartate, proline, valine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, and phenylalanine. Only glutamate oxidation activity was found while the other amino acid oxidation activities were not detected. DLDH744 showed strong glutamate oxidation activity (Fig 1a). The apparent Km value for glutamate oxidation was 5.7 ± 0.09 mM, which is higher than that of pyruvate. The kcat value for glutamate oxidation was calculated to be 22.3 ± 0.1 /min. The reverse reaction product glutamic acid was also confirmed by HPLC when using NADH as a coenzyme and á-ketoglutarate with NH4+ as substrates (Fig 1b). No product of hyroxyglutarate was detected in the absence of ammonia (data not shown). Additionally, phenylpyruvate was also experimentally confirmed to be a substrate for DLDH744 with an apparent Km value of 3.32 ± 0.08 mM for phenylpyruvate, which is very close to that of pyruvate. Only D-phenyllactic acid was detected as the product from phenylpyruvate, indicating DLDH744 is a strict D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase. Both NAD+ and NADP+ could serve as coenzymes for GDH activity (data not shown), which is consistent with previously reported LDH activity [12]. The specific activity of DLDH744 was 7.5 ± 0.17 U/mg for the LDH activity and 0.89 ± 0.01 U/mg for the GDH activity.
(a) Analysis of the enzymatic activity using a UV spectrophotometer. (Filled circle) Reaction with NAD+ as coenzyme. (Filled block) Reaction without DLDH744. (Filled triangles) Reaction without glutamate substrate. (b) Analysis of the reaction product using HPLC. (i) Control. (ii) Glutamic acid standard. (iii) Reaction solution with substrates and enzyme DLDH744.
The residues responsible for stabilizing the dimer interface
To further investigate this novel enzyme, the complete tertiary structure of DLDH744 in complex with NAD+ was determined (PDB accession code: 4XKJ). The structure of DLDH744 was determined by molecular replacement method and refined at 3.15 Å-resolution as previously described [12]. Two identical monomers of DLDH744 were (with Cα atoms r.m.s. difference of 1.339 Å) associated at the cofactor binding domain to form the homo-dimer in one asymmetric unit. The dimer interface is stabilized mainly by hydrogen-bonding interactions between residues from α helices α5(Ser102-Arg119), α6(Leu121-Glu130), α12(Glu279-Arg285) and connecting loops (Fig 2). Overall, the α5 helices from two subunits are interacting with each other, and α6 and α12 are associated by hydrogen bonds to bring the two subunits together to form the homo-dimer. In the dimer interface, the amino group of Arg116 at α5 forms a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group of Asp125 at α5 of another subunit (2.7 Å), the amino group of Arg119 form a hydrogen bond with Gly297 (2.8 Å) and Ser105 (2.9 Å), and the main chain oxygen of Gly128 forms interacts with the amino group of Arg285 in α12 (2.5 Å), carboxyl group of Gln131 is hydrogen bonding with the main chain oxygen of Leu271 (2.9 Å). The main chain oxygen and nitrogen atoms of Phe133 form a hydrogen bond with Gln269 (2.9 Å), Asn268 (2.7 Å) in the loop region of another subunit. Side chain of Trp135 interacts with Asn268 (3.1Å). Ala140 forms a hydrogen bond with main chain of Tyr299 (3.2 Å) and Asn301 (2.7 Å), while the side chain of Asn301 is further stabilized by a hydrogen bond with Ser145 (3.1 Å). The hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl group of Glu142 and hydroxyl group of Ser102 (2.8 Å), and the main chain nitrogen atom of Ile143 and hydroxyl group of Glu108 (3.0 Å) stabilize the conformation of the α5.
The subunits of the homo-dimer are shown in blue and orange respectively. The secondary structures located at the dimer interface are shown in ribbon and the key amino acid residues that mediate the dimer formation are shown as dashed lines.
Identification of DLDH744 active sites by structural analysis
As DLDH744 was demonstrated to be a novel bifunctional enzyme, it is interesting to explore the catalytic mechanism from the structure analysis. Although it has both LDH and GDH activities, the protein structure shows that only one active center was found in DLDH744. The cofactor NAD+ molecule binds in the pocket located on top of the cofactor binding domain. The NAD+ molecule adopts an extended conformation where the nicotinamide and ribose rings are approximately perpendicular to the adenine ring. The dihydronicotinamide group is extended into a pocket formed by His295, Arg234, Gly297, Phe298 and Tyr101 (Fig 3). NADH could be converted to NAD+ when the nicotinamide ring donates a proton. Meanwhile, pyruvate or á-ketoglutarate gets the proton and forms lactic acid or glutamic acid in the same place. The residues around the nicotinamide ring of NADH in the active center of the crystal structure should be essential for enzyme reaction.
The key amino acids necessary for NAD+ binding are shown in sticks in orange. The hydrogen bonding interactions between these amino acid residues and NAD+ are shown in dashed lines, with the distance labeled.
By comparing with other NAD-dependent lactate dehydrogenases [17], His295 is supposed to function as the internal acid-base catalyst in dehydrogenase activity; Glu263 stabilizes the protonated form of His295, and Arg234 forms a hydrogen bond with the nicotinamide ribose ring (3.2 Å). Additionally, the main chain nitrogen atom of Phe298 forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of nicotinamide ring. Gly79 is located in the entrance of the substrate entry. But Tyr101 and Met307 stay inside the substrate entry way, and may select the substrate at the cleft between the substrate binding domain and cofactor binding domain. Phe298, Tyr299 and Trp135 further form a hydrophobic triad near the active site, and possibly determine the substrate specificity, such as lactate or glutamate, by steric hindrance near the nicotinamide ring.
Site mutation study revealing the key active site residues
Based on the crystal structure, above amino acids around the nicotinamide ring were chosen to study their roles in the LDH and/or GDH activities. Site-directed mutagenesis was conducted and the resulting enzymatic activities were evaluated. The mutations that showed dramatic influences on the LDH and/or GDH activities are shown in Fig 4. The LDH activities of Arg234, Gly79, Glu263, His295, Phe298 and Met307 mutants were dramatically reduced, indicating the significant role of these residues in D-LDH activity, which are consistent with the structural analysis. Additionally, the two residues Arg234 and Gly79 play a significant role in both LDH and GDH activities. Tyr101 is the one that was only critical for GDH activity.
(a) The activities of mutant lactate dehydrogenases. (b) The activities of glutamate dehydrogenase of the mutant strains. Data points and error bars represent the means and standard deviations of three parallel replicates, respectively.
Phylogenetic relationship
There is no significant similarity between DLDH744 and any GDHs present in the UNIPROT database, making the referential study of DLDH744 from GDH unreliable. Then we just chose the enzymes from D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family to investigate the evolutionary relationships. D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family includes D-lactate dehydrogenase (DLDH), D-erythronate-4-phosphate dehydrogenase (DEPDH) [18], D-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase (DHICDH) [19], D-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (DPGDH) [20], D-glycerate dehydrogenase (DGLDH) [21], D-mandelate dehydrogenase (DMDH) [22], vancomycin-resistant protein H (VANH) [23], phenylpyruvate reductase (PPR) [24], glyoxylate reductase (GR) [25], 2-ketopantoate reductase (KPR) [26] and transcriptional co-repressor CtBP (CTBP) [27]. Enzymes from this family share a common characteristic: the chiral product of the reaction is the D-form, and they generally exhibit strict specificity toward NAD+ except that GR and KPR are NADP+-dependent while PPR and VANH preferentially use NADPH. However, the core fold of all the above enzymes is structurally conserved [28]. The NAD+-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH) [29], phosphate dehydrogenase (PPDH) [30] and L-alanine dehydrogenase (ADH) [31] also share the structural similarities with the D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family. Fig 5 shows a phylogenetic tree of DLDH744 and all the above enzymes. Interestingly, DLDH744 is a little different from the other D-lactate dehydrogenases, while it is more phylogenetically close to D-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase. These results indicated that there is a diversity of substrate patterns in the D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family, although they share the similar structure.
The accession number of each enzyme in uniprot database (http://www.uniprot.org) is provided in brackets. Abbreviations: D-lactate dehydrogenase (DLDH), D-erythronate-4-phosphate dehydrogenase (DEPDH), D-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase (DHICDH), D-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (DPGDH), D-glycerate dehydrogenase (DGLDH), D-mandelate dehydrogenase (DMDH), vancomycin-resistant protein H (VANH), phenylpyruvate reductase (PPR), glyoxylate reductase (GR), 2-ketopantoate reductase (KPR), transcriptional co-repressor CtBP (CTBP), formate dehydrogenase (FDH), phosphate dehydrogenase (PPDH) and L-alanine dehydrogenase (ADH).
Discussion
D-LDH and GDH belong to two distinct families: D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases and Glu/Leu/Phe/Val dehydrogenases, respectively. As DLDH744 possesses both activities, the comparison of protein structures between DLDH744 and GDHs was first investigated. However, the similarities between DLDH744 and GDH were rather low on the amino acid sequence level. Consequentially, the study was shifted to investigate the protein structure to reveal the key sites to explore the mechanism.
Gly79, Arg234, His295 and Phe298 in DLDH744 were identified to be key residues for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity. Notably, Glu263 and Met307 are also important residues for LDH activity since the relative activities of the mutated DLDH744 were around 5% ~ 20% of that of wild enzyme, respectively. In previously reported L-lactate dehydrogenases, His195 plays a crucial role in enzyme catalysis [32, 33]. It forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of pyruvate or the hydroxyl group of lactate, thus polarizing the group and making it prone to receiving or donating a hydride ion. This residue also acts as an acid/base group by donating (or abstracting) a proton to the pyruvate carbonyl group or the lactate hydroxyl group [34]. Therefore, it is important that this histidine residue is able to switch between protonated and deprotonated forms for the reversibility of the reaction. In DLDH744, the corresponding histidine residue is His295. This residue is highly conserved in the sequence alignment of D-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenases. Structural studies on D-LDH and members of the D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family have confirmed that the corresponding histidine residue forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of pyruvate [35, 36] and is a proton donor for D-LDH [37]. Additionally, by comparing with other NAD-dependent dehydrogenases, Glu263 stabilizes the protonated form of His295 and increases its pKa [38]. The main chain nitrogen atom of Phe298 forms hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of nicotinamide ring, then mutation of Phe298 to Ala decreased the NAD+ binding affinity. Furthermore, Phe298 and Met307 may be structurally responsible for discrimination of the substrates. Thus, mutation of His295, Glu263, Met307 and Phe298 to alanine residue all decreased the LDH activity.
In contrast to the LDH activity, only mutation of Gly79, Tyr101 and Arg234 decreased the GDH activity. Gly79 and Arg234 were reported to be involved in substrate binding and mediating the orientation of the substrate [37]. Gly79 was observed to be located at the substrate entry way while Arg234 is structurally found to function in stabilizing the nicotinamide ribose ring by hydrogen bonding interaction (3.2 Å) in this study. The LDH and GDH activities of the Arg234 and Gly79 mutants were both markedly decreased confirming the role of these residues in substrate binding. The substrate molecule is oriented face-on and directly adjacent to the nicotinamide ring of the coenzyme, where it is ideally positioned for transfer of a hydride ion during catalysis. Orientation of the substrate is very important for the enzyme reaction, thus Arg234 and Gly79 are essential for both LDH and GDH activities.
Lys125 of GDH have been found to act as acid/base groups by donating (or abstracting) a proton, similar to the function of His295 in LDHs [39]. However, the lysine residues of DLDH744 are located far from the active center and are therefore less likely to be responsible for GDH activity. Gunka et al. [40] reported that the tyrosine residue was crucial for activity of the glutamate dehydrogenase RocG from Bacillus subtilis since the activity of the Y158H mutant was severely reduced. Structural analysis showed that Tyr101 is located structurally on top of the nicotinamide ring and at the substrate entry way in DLDH744. It is plausible that this residue is available to make contact with substrates and act as a key residue for GDH activity. Consistently, the subsequent experiments verified Tyr101 of DLDH744 as a unique important residue for GDH activity. Interestingly, DLDH744 is different from other D-lactate dehydrogenases and it is much phylogenetically closer to D-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase family. DLDH744 exhibit high activity towards 2-ketoacids with bigger substrate (α-ketoglutarate) or much larger aromatic side chain phenylpyruvate, indicating DLDH744 might also have a larger space in the active center which gives an explanation why DLDH744 could accept the larger substrates.
Conclusions
The D-lactate dehydrogenase from a Sporolactobacillus inulinus strain was experimentally verified to have both lactate dehydrogenase and glutamate dehydrogenase activities. The biochemical properties of the enzyme were illustrated by X-ray crystal structural characterization and site-mutation analyses. Characterization of the active residues of this enzyme contributes to the mechanistic understanding of the activities.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170116 & 31300601) and the PUMC Youth Fund (33320140186). BY is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: BY HD. Performed the experiments: LZ. Analyzed the data: LZ XX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LW HD. Wrote the paper: LZ XX BY.
References
- 1. Wang LM, Cai YM, Zhu LF, Guo HL, Yu B (2014) Major role of NAD-dependent lactate dehydrogenases in high optically pure L-lactic acid production by thermophilic Bacillus coagulans. Appl Environ Microbiol 80: 7134–7141. pmid:25217009
- 2. Garvie EI (1980) Bacterial lactate dehydrogenases. Microbiol Rev 44: 106–139. pmid:6997721
- 3. Hummel W (1999) Large-scale applications of NAD(P)-dependent oxidoreductases: recent developments. Trends Biotechnol 17: 487–492. pmid:10557162
- 4. Peng LL, Wang LM, Che CC, Yang G, Yu B, Ma YH (2013) Bacillus sp. strain P38: an efficient producer of L-lactate from cellulosic hydrolysate, with high tolerance for 2-furfural. Bioresour Technol 149: 169–176. pmid:24096283
- 5. Jiang X, Xue YF, Wang AY, Wang LM, Zhang GM, Zeng QT, et al. (2013) Efficient production of polymer-grade L-lactate by an alkaliphilic Exiguobacterium sp. strain under nonsterile open fermentation conditions. Bioresour Technol 143: 665–668. pmid:23838203
- 6. Li Y, Wang LM, Ju JS, Yu B, Ma YH (2013) Efficient production of polymer-grade D-lactate by Sporolactobacillus laevolacticus DSM442 with agricultural waste cottonseed as the sole nitrogen source. Bioresour Technol 142: 186–191. pmid:23735801
- 7. Richter N, Zienert A, Hummel W (2011) A single-point mutation enables lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus subtilis to utilize NAD+ and NADP+ as cofactor. Eng Life Sci 11: 26–36.
- 8. Britton KL, Baker PJ, Engel PC, Rice DW, Stillman TJ (1993) Evolution of substrate diversity in the superfamily of amino acid dehydrogenases. J Mol Biol 234: 938–945. pmid:8263939
- 9. Smith TJ, Peterson PE, Schmidt T, Fang J, Stanley CA (2001) Structures of bovine glutamate dehydrogenase complexes elucidate the mechanism of purine regulation. J Mol Biol 307: 707–720. pmid:11254391
- 10. Sharkey MA, Oliveira TF, Engel PC, Khan AR (2013) Structure of NADP(+)-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli—reflections on the basis of coenzyme specificity in the family of glutamate dehydrogenases. FEBS J 280: 4681–4692. pmid:23879525
- 11. Bugg TD, Wright GD, Dutka-Malen S, Arthur M., Courvalin P, Walsh CT (1991) Molecular basis for vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium BM4147: biosynthesis of a depsipeptide peptidoglycan precursor by vancomycin resistance proteins VanH and VanA. Biochemistry 30: 10408–10415. pmid:1931965
- 12. Zhu LF, Xu XL, Wang LM, Dong H, Yu B, Ma YH (2015) NADP+-preferring D-lactate dehydrogenase from Sporolactobacillus inulinus. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 6294–6301. pmid:26150461
- 13. Yu B, Su F, Wang LM, Xu K, Zhao B, Xu P (2011) Draft genome sequence of Sporolactobacillus inulinus strain CASD, an efficient D-lactic acid-producing bacterium with high-concentration lactate tolerance capability. J Bacteriol 193: 5864–5865. pmid:21952540
- 14. Olson JA, Anfinsen CB (1952) The crystallization and characterization of L-glutamic acid dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 197: 67–79. pmid:12981035
- 15. Urban A, Neukirchen S, Jaeger KE (1997) A rapid and efficient method for site-directed mutagenesis using one-step overlap extension PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 2227–2228. pmid:9153325
- 16. Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson J, Higgins DG, et al. (2003) Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3497–3500. pmid:12824352
- 17. Razeto A, Kochhar S, Hottinger H, Dauter M, Wilson KS, Lamzin VS (2002) Domain closure, substrate specificity and catalysis of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J Mol Biol 318: 109–119. pmid:12054772
- 18. Ha JY, Lee JH, Kim KH, Kim DJ, Lee HH, Kim HK, et al. (2007) Crystal structure of D-erythronate-4-phosphate dehydrogenase complexed with NAD. J Mol Biol 366: 1294–1304. pmid:17217963
- 19. Dengler U, Niefind K, Kieβ M, Schomburg D (1997) Crystal structure of a ternary complex of D-2-hydroxyisocaproate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus casei, NAD+ and 2-oxoisocaproate at 1.9 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 267: 640–660. pmid:9126843
- 20. Singh RK, Raj I, Pujari R, Gourinath S (2014) Crystal structures and kinetics of Type III 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase reveal catalysis by lysine. FEBS J 281: 5498–5512. pmid:25294608
- 21. Goldberg JD, Yoshida T, Brick P (1994) Crystal structure of a NAD-dependent D-glycerate dehydrogenase at 2.4 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 236:1123–1140. pmid:8120891
- 22. Tamura Y, Ohkubo A, Iwai S, Wada Y, Shinoda T, Arai K, et al. (2002) Two forms of NAD-dependent D-mandelate dehydrogenase in Enterococcus faecalis IAM 10071. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 947–951. pmid:11823242
- 23. Arthur M, Molinas C, Dutka-Malen S, Courvalin P (1991) Structural relationship between the vancomycin resistance protein VanH and 2-hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenases. Gene 103: 133–134. pmid:1908809
- 24. Fujii T, Shimizu M, Doi Y, Fujita T, Ito T, Miura D, et al. (2011) Novel fungal phenylpyruvate reductase belongs to D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase family. Biochim Biophys Acta 1814: 1669–1676. pmid:21672638
- 25. Booth MP, Conners R, Rumsby G, Brady RL (2006) Structural basis of substrate specificity in human glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase. J Mol Biol 360: 178–189. pmid:16756993
- 26. Wada Y, Iwai S, Tamura Y, Ando T, Shinoda T, Arai K, et al. (2008) A new family of D-2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases that comprises D-mandelate dehydrogenases and 2-ketopantoate reductases. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 1087–1094. pmid:18391442
- 27. Schaeper U, Boyd JM, Verma S, Uhlmann E, Subramanian T, Chinnadurai G (1995) Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92: 10467–10471. pmid:7479821
- 28. Stoll VS, Kimber MS, Pai EF (1996) Insights into substrate binding by D-2-ketoacid dehydrogenases from the structure of Lactobacillus pentosus D-lactate dehydrogenase. Structure 4: 437–447. pmid:8740366
- 29. Popov VO, Lamzin V (1994) NAD(+)-dependent formate dehydrogenase. Biochem J 301: 625–643. pmid:8053888
- 30. Woodyer R, Wheatley JL, Relyea HA, Rimkus S, van der Donk WA (2005) Site-directed mutagenesis of active site residues of phosphite dehydrogenase. Biochemistry 44: 4765–4774. pmid:15779903
- 31. Baker PJ, Sawa Y, Shibata H, Sedelnikova SE, Rice DW (1998) Analysis of the structure and substrate binding of Phormidium lapideum alanine dehydrogenase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 5: 561–567.
- 32. Auerbach G, Ostendorp R, Prade L, Korndörfer I, Dams T, Huber R, et al. (1998) Lactate dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotogamaritima: the crystal structure at 2.1 å resolution reveals strategies for intrinsic protein stabilization. Structure 6: 769–781. pmid:9655830
- 33. Wigley DB, Gamblin SJ, Turkenburg JP, Dodson EJ, Piontek K, Muirhead H, et al. (1992) Structure of a ternary complex of an allosteric lactate dehydrogenase from Bacillus stearothermophilus at 2.5 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 223: 317–335. pmid:1731077
- 34. Holbrook JJ, Ingram V (1973) Ionic properties of an essential histidine residue in pig heart lactate dehydrogenase. Biochem J 131: 729–738. pmid:4352913
- 35. Kochhar S, Lamzin VS, Razeto A, Delley M, Hottinger H, Germond JE (2000) Roles of His205, His296, His303 and Asp259 in catalysis by NAD+-specific D-lactate dehydrogenase. Eur J Biochem 267: 1633–1639. pmid:10712593
- 36. Holton SJ, Anandhakrishnan M, Geerlof A, Wilmanns M (2013) Structural characterization of a D-isomer specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. J Struct Biol 181: 179–184. pmid:23110853
- 37. Antonyuk SV, Strange RW, Ellis MJ, Bessho Y, Kuramitsu S, Inoue Y, et al. (2009) Structure of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Aquifex aeolicus complexed with NAD+ and lactic acid (or pyruvate). Acta Crystallogr Sect F: Struct Biol Cryst Commun 65: 1209–1213.
- 38. Razeto A, Kochhar S, Hottinger H, Dauter M, Wilson KS, Lamzin VS (2002) Domain closure, substrate specificity and catalysis of D-lactate dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus bulgaricus. J Mol Biol 318: 109–119. pmid:12054772
- 39. Stillman T, Baker P, Britton K, Rice D (1993) Conformational flexibility in glutamate dehydrogenase: role of water in substrate recognition and catalysis. J Mol Biol 234: 1131–1139. pmid:8263917
- 40. Gunka K, Newman JA, Commichau FM, Herzberg C, Rodrigues C, Hewitt L, et al. (2010) Functional dissection of a trigger enzyme: mutations of the Bacillus subtilis glutamate dehydrogenase RocG that affect differentially its catalytic activity and regulatory properties. J Mol Biol 400: 815–827. pmid:20630473