Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Increased THEMIS First Exon Usage in CD4+ T-Cells Is Associated with a Genotype that Is Protective against Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Genome wide association studies have identified over 100 common variants associated with multiple sclerosis, the majority of which implicate immunologically relevant genes, particularly those involved in T-cell development. SNP rs13204742 at the THEMIS/PTPRK locus is one such variant. Here, we have demonstrated mutually exclusive use of exon 1 and 2 amongst 16 novel THEMIS isoforms. We also show inverse correlation between THEMIS expression in human CD4+ T-cells and dosage of the multiple sclerosis risk allele at rs13204742, driven by reduced expression of exon 1- containing isoforms. In silico analysis suggests that this may be due to cell-specific, allele-dependent binding of the transcription factors FoxP3 and/or E47. Research exploring the functional implications of GWAS variants is important for gaining an understanding of disease pathogenesis, with the ultimate aim of identifying new therapeutic targets.

Citation: Davies JL, Thompson S, Kaur-Sandhu H, Sawcer S, Coles A, Ban M, et al. (2016) Increased THEMIS First Exon Usage in CD4+ T-Cells Is Associated with a Genotype that Is Protective against Multiple Sclerosis. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327

Editor: Luis Graca, University of Lisbon, PORTUGAL

Received: March 9, 2016; Accepted: June 14, 2016; Published: July 20, 2016

Copyright: © 2016 Davies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, the Department of Clinical Neurosciences at University of Cambridge and the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility. JLD was supported by the Pattinson family through personal funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The Pattinson family have no competing interests in relation to this work.

Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of chronic neurological disability in young adults. Although disease aetiology is uncertain, it is clear that both genetic and environmental factors influence an individual’s risk of disease development[1].

Genome wide association studies (GWAS)[2] and subsequent fine mapping of risk loci (Immunochip)[3] have identified 110 common MS risk variants, the majority of which lie within 50kb of genes with immunological function, particularly genes involved in T-cell development[2].

One of the implicated genomic regions lies on chromosome 6q and contains two genes critically important for T-cell development: thymocyte expressed molecule involved in selection (THEMIS) and protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, κ (PTPRK). Association with this locus was first identified in the 2011 GWAS, in which the most associated SNP was rs802734, an intergenic SNP located 56 kb 5’ of THEMIS and 11 kb 3’ of PTPRK [2]. Subsequent fine-mapping of this region in the Immunochip study identified rs13204742 as the lead SNP, a variant 23 kb 5’of THEMIS, and 44 kb 3’ of PTPRK [3]. Notably, an association between SNP rs802734 and coeliac disease has also been demonstrated[4], and subsequent investigations have shown that this SNP influences THEMIS, but not PTPRK, expression in treated coeliac disease patients[5]. Fine-mapping data for coeliac disease localised the causal variants driving this association close to the 3’ UTR of PTPRK [6].

SNP rs13204742 is not in LD with any common coding variants in either THEMIS or PTPRK, implying that this variant likely influences disease risk by altering expression rather than by altering protein structure and/or function[7]. This region also contains a non-coding antisense RNA (RP11-103C16.2) which overlaps PTPRK (Ensembl.org). Between 50–70% of loci in mammalian genomes are said to code for antisense transcripts, which are proposed to regulate expression of their sense genes[8].

Both THEMIS and PTPRK are required for thymopoieisis, which has been shown to be deficient in MS[9–11]. In particular they are required for thymocyte positive selection and commitment of double positive (DP) T-cells to the CD4+ lineage, including to the T regulatory cell (Treg) lineage. Tregs from individuals with MS are widely reported to have impaired suppressive capacity[12], however it has been suggested that this may be due to inclusion of activated CD4+CD25hiCD127hi effector T-cells in the original Treg assays [13]. Reduced numbers of recently thymically derived Tregs have been reported by some groups [14, 15]. Rodents deficient in either THEMIS or PTPRK have fewer CD4+ T-cells[16–21] and lack CD4+ Treg function[22]. Murine and human studies have also shown that THEMIS and PTPRK play a key role in the TCR signalling pathway[16, 23, 24]. Unlike THEMIS[19], PTPRK is also expressed at high level in B-cells, in which it acts as a tumour suppressor[25].

Therefore, given the reported immunological functions of THEMIS and PTPRK, we elected to investigate the effects of SNP rs13204742 on T-cell gene expression at the THEMIS/PTPRK locus, thymic function, the peripheral T-cell repertoire, and T-cell activation.

Results

Ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell THEMIS mRNA expression decreases with increasing genetic risk

It is known that genomic exon 5 of THEMIS encodes one of its two CABIT domains, a proline rich region (PRR) required for protein-protein interactions, and a YY-motif required for interaction with Grb2, making it crucial to the function of THEMIS[26]. We therefore first explored genotypic effects on the mRNA expression of (i) “functional” exon 5-containing THEMIS isoforms, (ii) PTPRK and (iii) the antisense non-coding RNA gene RP11-103C16.2 in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells and CD19+ B-cells.

Decreased exon 5 THEMIS mRNA expression in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells with increased risk allele dosage was observed (n = 73) (CD4+ ANOVA p = 0.018, Turkey’s test ‘GG vs TT’ p = 0.024, ‘GG vs GT’ p = 0.943, ‘GT vs TT’ p = 0.053; CD8+ ANOVA p = 0.036, Turkey’s test ‘GG vs TT’ p = 0.094, ‘GG vs GT’ p = 0.940, ‘GT vs TT’ p = 0.044) (Fig 1). THEMIS was detected in B-cells, but no genotypic differences were seen (data not shown), suggesting a T-cell-specific effect. We noted that THEMIS expression was higher in CD8+ than CD4+ T-cells, as has been previously reported in mice [19]. RP11-103C16.2 mRNA expression was inversely related to PTPRK expression (data not shown), in keeping with the hypothesis that it regulates sense gene transcription. No genotypic differences in PTPRK or RP11-103C16.2 expression were observed in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells or B-cells (Figure A in S1 File); genotype was also not correlated with the ratio of RP11-103C16.2/PTPRK expression in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells (Figure A in S1 File).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. THEMIS expression is decreased in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from risk homozygotes.

Error bars display standard deviation from the mean. Upper horizontal lines indicate the significance level of ANOVA tests; lower horizontal brackets represent significant differences identified by Turkey’s multiple comparisons tests between the bracketed genotypes. * p ≤ 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327.g001

Identification of novel THEMIS isoforms

Three isoforms of THEMIS are listed in the RefSeq database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/refseq/, accessed on March 31st 2015); two use genomic exon 2 as their first exon (NM_001010923 and NM_001164685), the other uses genomic exon 1 (NM_001164687) (Fig 2). This raises the possibility that THEMIS expression may be regulated in time and/or location by alternative first exon usage, a mechanism proposed to be a consequence of differential transcription factor recruitment[27–29].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Genotype at SNP rs13204742 is associated with differences in T-cell THEMIS exon 1 expression.

(A) Decreased THEMIS exon 1 expression in ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells is associated with an increasing genetic load of the risk allele (T). There are no genotypic differences in THEMIS exon 2 expression. ** p ≤ 0.01; ns = non-significant. (B) Exon structures of 16 novel THEMIS isoforms, grouped by novel exon boundaries; RefSeq isoforms are also displayed with their RefSeq identifiers (bottom).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327.g002

To explore this further, we first searched for novel THEMIS exon junctions by PCR and then validated these by Sanger sequencing of PCR products. Using combinations of exon-spanning primers, intra-exonic primers, and internal sequencing primers, a total of 16 novel isoforms were inferred from sequencing of the PCR products (Fig 2B) (primer sequences given in Table A in S2 File). In silico analysis (NCBI ORF finder) suggested that only 5 of these isoforms were in open reading frame (ORF) for THEMIS (Table B in S2 File). Alternative first exon usage was demonstrated in all isoforms identified–exon 1 and 2 were always mutually exclusive.

Of the 16 isoforms, 11 lacked exon 5, which is proposed to code for key functional domains of THEMIS[26]. The original primers we used to investigate “functional” THEMIS expression by qPCR spanned the exon 4/5 junction, suggesting that they were limited in their interrogation of total THEMIS expression.

Decreased THEMIS expression is due to a decrease in exon 1-containing isoforms

Hypothesising that rs13204742 might exert its regulatory effects by altering the balance of exon 1 and exon 2-containing THEMIS isoforms, we tested for genotypic associations with differences in first exon usage.

A significant decrease in THEMIS exon 1 expression was observed in ex vivo CD4+ T-cells, with increasing genetic risk (ANOVA p = 0.0055; Turkey’s test, ‘GG vs TT’ p = 0.0038). A similar trend was observed in CD8+ T-cells, but did not reach significance (ANOVA p = 0.1160; Turkey’s test ‘GG vs TT’ p = 0.0958) (Fig 2A). There was no association between THEMIS exon 2 expression and genotype (CD4+ ANOVA p = 0.3588; CD8+ Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.7427). These data suggest that the genotype-associated decrease in THEMIS expression identified using exon 4/5 spanning primers was due to reduced expression of THEMIS exon 1-containing isoforms. (Sequencing electropherograms are displayed in Figure B of S1 File). This observation is supported by the significant positive correlation between THEMIS exon 1 and exon 4/5 expression (Figure C of S1 File).

A trend towards differences in THEMIS exon 1 expression were observed at the protein level

Ex vivo CD4+ T-cells exhibiting the most extreme levels of both THEMIS exon 1 and exon 2 expression by qPCR were selected for analysis of THEMIS protein expression (n = 6, 3 vs. 3). Those individuals with greatest THEMIS mRNA expression showed a trend towards increased THEMIS protein expression, as determined by western blotting (Figure D of S1 File). These data suggest that genotypic differences in THEMIS mRNA expression may be maintained at the protein level.

Functional consequences of genetic variation at SNP rs1320472 are not associated with differences in T-cell IL2 expression, or thymic activity

Given their role in TCR signalling, we next explored the influence of genotype on “functional” THEMIS, THEMIS exons 1 and 2, PTPRK, and IL2 expression resulting from CD3/CD28 induced T-cell activation in separated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. Fold differences in THEMIS, PTPRK and IL2 gene expression upon stimulation were determined at the peak/trough of expression post-stimulation, and the time-point of return to baseline expression was also determined. TCR stimulation did not reveal genotypic differences in THEMIS, PTPRK or IL2 mRNA expression (data not shown).

The association between genotype at SNP rs13204742 and thymic function was investigated by quantification of sjTRECs/ml and sjTRECs/μg CD4+ and CD8+ DNA, and by examining the relative frequency of circulating naïve CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells (CCR7+CD45RA+) and recent thymic emigrants (RTEs; defined as CD4+CCR7+CD45RA+CD31+ T-cells). No genotypic difference was found (n = 73; Figure E of S1 File). Furthermore, no differences were found in the proportion of circulating naïve Tregs (CD4+CD45RA+FoxP3+), memory Tregs (CD4+CD45RA-FoxP3hi) or RTE Tregs (CD4+CD45RA+FoxP3+CD31+) by genotype (n = 32; Figure F of S1 File).

In silico analysis of transcription factor binding and chromatin state

The mechanism by which SNP rs13204742 regulates THEMIS mRNA expression was explored by in silico analyses of transcription factor binding and chromatin state at this SNP and proximal SNPs rs67707912 and rs72973730 (r2 ≥ 0.8 with rs13204742).

According to Alggen PROMO, the minor risk alleles were predicted to disrupt binding of transcription factors E47 and FoxP3 at SNP rs13204742 and SNP rs67707912 respectively; transcription factor binding at SNP rs72973730 was not disrupted.

Haploreg v4.1 data (www.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/), from the Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, 2015, were used to investigate chromatin state at SNPs rs13204742, rs67707912 and rs72973730. Promoter and enhancer marks (H3K4me3 and H3K4me1, respectively) were present at all three SNPs in primary T-cell subsets. The H3K27ac mark (distinguishing active from poised/inactive enhancers[30]) was detected at SNPs rs67707912 and rs72973730 across T-cell subsets, but limited to PMA and ionomycin stimulated T-cells and naïve CD8+ T-cells at SNP rs13204742. From these data, an active regulatory function could be conferred to all three SNPs.

Discussion

To date, 110 common variants have been shown to be associated with susceptibility to multiple sclerosis[3], and much current research is aimed at understanding the functional effects of these variants. Here, we explored the functional mechanisms underlying SNP rs13204742, the most significantly associated SNP at the THEMIS/PTPRK locus in the Immunochip study[3]. We focused our investigations on Immunochip SNP rs13204742, yet dense genotyping in celiac disease and multiple sclerosis has revealed multiple independent signals at the THEMIS/PTPRK locus[3, 6] so further work will be required to refine the association signals within this region.

We have demonstrated that ex vivo CD4+ T-cell THEMIS expression shows a significant inverse correlation with carriage of the multiple sclerosis risk allele, and that this correlation is also reflected in protein expression; we found an equivalent trend in CD8+ T-cells. We have shown that this is due to decreased expression of exon 1-containing THEMIS isoforms. In silico analysis suggested that this may result from allele dependent binding of the transcription factors FoxP3 and/or E47.

We did not find any evidence that decreased expression of THEMIS exon 1-containing isoforms influences thymopoiesis (either of conventional T-cells or Tregs) as has been previously reported in murine studies[16, 17, 19, 20]. However, we have been limited to indirect measurements of thymic function–namely quantification of TRECs and the number of circulating recent thymic emigrants, which may be insufficiently sensitive to detect small genotype driven differences in thymic function.

Subtle defects in proximal TCR signalling, specifically impaired Erk and calcium signalling, have been observed in anti-CD3 and anti-CD4 activated thymocytes from Themis deficient mice[16]. However, in our analysis we found no evidence that genotype influences TCR-induced IL2 expression, although our experiments likely had a low detection sensitivity; differences may have been observed under different stimulation conditions. It is also possible that genotypic effects on both thymic function and TCR signalling may be masked by subject differences in environmental exposures (such as infections) and genetic risk at other established MS-associated loci.

We have identified 16 new isoforms of THEMIS, of which a significant proportion (n = 11) were not in open reading frame (ORF); the reason why so many untranslated mRNAs should be produced is not clear, but may represent an additional level of control of protein expression[31, 32]. The five isoforms in ORF used either exon 1 or exon 2 as the first exon, in a mutually exclusive manner. Alternate first exon usage has been shown to be a mechanism of regulating gene expression in time and/or location as a consequence of differential transcription factor recruitment, and we found evidence that genotype at rs13204742 influences the expression of exon 1-containing isoforms[27–29]. Further experimental work would be required to confirm the role of alternate first exon usage in regulating THEMIS expression.

In silico analysis suggested that genotype at SNP rs13204742 and SNP rs67707912 affect binding of the transcription factors E47 and FoxP3, respectively. SNP rs67707912 was selected for analysis as it is in strong LD with SNP rs13204742 and, despite SNP rs13204742 having been initially identified in the Crohn’s Immunochip[33], rs67707912 was shown to be the likely associated SNP at the THEMIS/PTPRK locus by subsequent algorithm-based analysis[34]. The association of SNP rs13204742 and its proximal SNPs with active promoter and enhancer marks in T-cell subsets provides additional evidence of their regulatory function. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and chromatin conformation capture (3C) studies would be needed to establish transcription factor binding and confirm chromatin interactions of these SNPs with their target gene(s).

In summary, this is the first study to investigate the effects of genotype at SNP rs13204742 on immune cell function. Our data suggest that the multiple sclerosis risk allele is associated with decreased THEMIS expression in human T-cells, and that this association is driven by differences in exon 1-containing THEMIS isoforms. Research exploring the functional implications of GWAS variants, such as those performed here, is important for gaining an understanding of the pathways involved in disease with the ultimate aim of identifying new therapeutic targets.

Materials and Methods

Participant recruitment

Healthy volunteers (n = 73) were recruited via the Cambridge BioResource and consented to give blood for research purposes under CAMSAFE. CAMSAFE was given ethical approval by the NRES Committee East of England–Cambridge Central (REC 11/33/0007). Written consent was obtained for study participation, as approved by the ethics committee. Individuals were matched for age and gender across genotypes (see Table 1). Samples were processed blinded to genotype. Individuals taking immunotherapies, or with an active infection at the time of donation, were excluded. Healthy individuals, as opposed to multiple sclerosis patients, were studied to remove the complexities and confounding influences of an autoreactive immune system on the function of SNP rs13204742.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Participant demographics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327.t001

Cell isolation and separation

PBMCs were isolated from heparinised blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll PaquePlus; GE Healthcare, Amersham), and magnetically separated by positive selection to isolate CD19+ B-cells, followed by Pan T-cell isolation and CD8+ positive selection to enrich for CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells (Miltenyi Biotec). Purities of enriched cell fractions averaged between 91 and 95% (n = 26; data not shown).

T-cell activation

1 x 106/ml CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells were separately cultured in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma) and 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum, at 37°C in 5% CO2, with and without activation by CD3/CD28 Dynabeads (1:1 bead:cell ratio; Life technologies). Cells were harvested after 3, 24, and 72 h.

Flow cytometric T-cell phenotyping

PBMCs were phenotyped using the following antibodies from BD Biosciences: CD4-V500, CD8-PE, CCR7-FITC, CD45RA-PECy7, CD31-FITC, CD39-APC, CD25-PE, CD127-V450, FoxP3-APC. Intranuclear staining was performed using the FoxP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience). Data were acquired on a Canto II and analysed using FlowJo v7.6.5 (Tree Star Inc).

Quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen), and DNase I treated (Fermentas). Average RNA integrity number was 8.9 (Agilent Bioanalyzer; n = 44; data not shown). cDNA was synthesised using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit with RNase Inhibitor (Applied Biosystems). Semi-quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed on a QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System; cycling conditions were: 95°C 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C 15 s / 60°C 1 min. Gene expression assays for THEMIS (FAM; Hs01041269_m1), PTPRK (FAM; Hs00935224_m1), IL2 (FAM; Hs00174114_m1), and TBP (VIC; Hs00427620_m1) were ordered from Applied Biosystems. The following primers and probes were designed using Primer Express v2.0 and ordered from Life technologies: THEMIS exon 1 5’-GGCTCTTCCTGGATCCCTTATTT-3’ (forward), 5’-TGCGTAAGAGCACTGGAGCAT-3’ (reverse) and 6FAM-CAGGAGAGGAGGAAAA-MGB (probe); THEMIS exon 2 5’-TCACCCAGAAGCCACAAGTTTC-3’ (forward), 5’-CCATTGCTATGCCTTGGGTAGTT-3’ (reverse) and 6FAM-TGAGCACCAGGTCTAC-MGB (probe); RP11-103C16.2 5’-GGACCACAGCAGGGAAAAAG-3’ (forward), 5’-GCGATGAGCAGTGTGGAGAA-3’ (reverse) and 6FAM-CTGGAGGAAGCTCAC-MGB (probe). Relative expression was achieved using the standard curve method. A standard curve of Ct values for both the reference gene (TBP) and target gene was made from stock immune cell cDNA; for each sample loaded in triplicate, the average Ct values of the reference and target gene were determined, and the relative expression level was calculated from the equation of the line for the standard curve. Absence of an effect of cell stimulation on TBP mRNA expression was verified. Fold difference in expression upon stimulation was determined relative to an unstimulated cell control.

End-point PCR and Sanger sequencing

RNA and cDNA were prepared as described above. Primers for THEMIS isoform detection are given in Table A of S2 File. Each 10 μl reaction contained 500 nM of each primer, 50 ng cDNA, and AmpliTaq Gold (Applied Biosystems). Cycling conditions used were: 95°C 10 min; 40 cycles of 95°C 30 s / 60°C 30 s / 72°C 30 s; 72°C 7 min. PCR products were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 3730xl.

Western blotting

CD4+ T-cells were magnetically isolated from PBMCs by positive selection and cell lysates were stored in RIPA buffer (Sigma). Protein was separated on 10% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen), using 15 μg of CD4+ T-cell protein per lane. After electro-blotting transfer to PVDF membrane (Millipore), membranes were blocked for 1 h in 1 x TBST + 5% milk, then probed with anti-THEMIS (ab129174 [EPR7354], abcam) and anti-β-actin (AC-15, Sigma) overnight at 4°C. Blots were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (Dako), developed using Pierce ECL reagents (Life technologies), and visualised on a Biorad ChemiDoc Imager. Relative quantification of THEMIS expression to β-actin was performed using Gel analysis functions on Image J.

Quantification of sjTRECs

The sjTRECs/ml assay was performed according to Lorenzi et al (2008) [35]. Samples were run in triplicate, each reaction contained 500 ng DNA and was supplemented with 25 mM MgCl2. Cycling conditions: 94°C 2 min, 40 cycles at 94°C 30 s / 60°C 15 s / 72°C 2 min, 72°C 5 min. CD4+ and CD8+ sjTREC content was determined by calculating sjTRECs/μg DNA; the number of TRECs in 500 ng, a value derived from the sjTREC plasmid standard curve, was multiplied by two.

In silico analysis of transcription factor binding

Data from 1 000 genomes was used to identify SNPs in LD (r2 > 0.8; EUR population) with rs13204742. Alggen PROMO was used to predict transcription factor (TF) binding at each SNP plus 25 bp of 5’ and 3’ flanking sequences (assuming binding sites have an average length of 10 bp). The matrix dissimilarity threshold was 5%.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted for all genotypic comparisons, followed by a Turkey’s or Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.

Supporting Information

S1 File.

Supplementary images A-F.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327.s001

(DOCX)

S2 File.

Supplementary Tables A and B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158327.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Cambridge BioResource for sample provision; Simon McCallum from the Cambridge NIHR BRC Cell Phenotyping Hub for advice and support in flow cytometry; and Dr Lorenzi and Julie Diboll at Newcastle University for their advice with TREC assays and providing the sjTREC plasmid. This work was supported by the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JLD SS AC MB JJ. Performed the experiments: JLD ST HKS. Analyzed the data: JLD. Wrote the paper: JLD JJ.

References

  1. 1. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1502–17. pmid:18970977.
  2. 2. Sawcer S, International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2., Hellenthal G, Pirinen M, Spencer CC, et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011;476(7359):214–9. pmid:21833088; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3182531.
  3. 3. International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics C, Beecham AH, Patsopoulos NA, Xifara DK, Davis MF, Kemppinen A, et al. Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat Genet. 2013;45(11):1353–60. pmid:24076602; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3832895.
  4. 4. Dubois PC, Trynka G, Franke L, Hunt KA, Romanos J, Curtotti A, et al. Multiple common variants for celiac disease influencing immune gene expression. Nature genetics. 2010;42(4):295–302. pmid:20190752; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2847618.
  5. 5. Bondar C, Plaza-Izurieta L, Fernandez-Jimenez N, Irastorza I, Withoff S, Wijmenga C, et al. THEMIS and PTPRK in celiac intestinal mucosa: coexpression in disease and after in vitro gliadin challenge. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22(3):358–62. pmid:23820479; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3925264.
  6. 6. Trynka G, Hunt KA, Bockett NA, Romanos J, Mistry V, Szperl A, et al. Dense genotyping identifies and localizes multiple common and rare variant association signals in celiac disease. Nature genetics. 2011;43(12):1193–201. pmid:22057235; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3242065.
  7. 7. Sawcer S, Franklin RJ, Ban M. Multiple sclerosis genetics. Lancet neurology. 2014;13(7):700–9. pmid:24852507.
  8. 8. Morrissy AS, Griffith M, Marra MA. Extensive relationship between antisense transcription and alternative splicing in the human genome. Genome Res. 2011;21(8):1203–12. pmid:21719572; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3149488.
  9. 9. Hug A, Korporal M, Schroder I, Haas J, Glatz K, Storch-Hagenlocher B, et al. Thymic export function and T cell homeostasis in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of immunology. 2003;171(1):432–7. Epub 2003/06/21. pmid:12817027.
  10. 10. Duszczyszyn DA, Williams JL, Mason H, Lapierre Y, Antel J, Haegert DG. Thymic involution and proliferative T-cell responses in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;221(1–2):73–80. pmid:20223525.
  11. 11. Broux B, Hellings N, Venken K, Rummens JL, Hensen K, Van Wijmeersch B, et al. Haplotype 4 of the multiple sclerosis-associated interleukin-7 receptor alpha gene influences the frequency of recent thymic emigrants. Genes Immun. 2010;11(4):326–33. pmid:20072142.
  12. 12. Viglietta V, Baecher-Allan C, Weiner HL, Hafler DA. Loss of functional suppression by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 2004;199(7):971–9. pmid:15067033; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2211881.
  13. 13. Michel L, Berthelot L, Pettre S, Wiertlewski S, Lefrere F, Braudeau C, et al. Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have normal Treg function when cells expressing IL-7 receptor alpha-chain are excluded from the analysis. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(10):3411–9. pmid:18769633; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2525698.
  14. 14. Haas J, Fritzsching B, Trubswetter P, Korporal M, Milkova L, Fritz B, et al. Prevalence of newly generated naive regulatory T cells (Treg) is critical for Treg suppressive function and determines Treg dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Journal of immunology. 2007;179(2):1322–30. Epub 2007/07/10. pmid:17617625.
  15. 15. Venken K, Hellings N, Broekmans T, Hensen K, Rummens JL, Stinissen P. Natural naive CD4+CD25+CD127low regulatory T cell (Treg) development and function are disturbed in multiple sclerosis patients: recovery of memory Treg homeostasis during disease progression. Journal of immunology. 2008;180(9):6411–20. Epub 2008/04/22. pmid:18424765.
  16. 16. Fu G, Vallee S, Rybakin V, McGuire MV, Ampudia J, Brockmeyer C, et al. Themis controls thymocyte selection through regulation of T cell antigen receptor-mediated signaling. Nature immunology. 2009;10(8):848–56. pmid:19597499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2757056.
  17. 17. Johnson AL, Aravind L, Shulzhenko N, Morgun A, Choi SY, Crockford TL, et al. Themis is a member of a new metazoan gene family and is required for the completion of thymocyte positive selection. Nature immunology. 2009;10(8):831–9. pmid:19597497; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2908989.
  18. 18. Kakugawa K, Yasuda T, Miura I, Kobayashi A, Fukiage H, Satoh R, et al. A novel gene essential for the development of single positive thymocytes. Molecular and cellular biology. 2009;29(18):5128–35. pmid:19620281; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2738282.
  19. 19. Lesourne R, Uehara S, Lee J, Song KD, Li L, Pinkhasov J, et al. Themis, a T cell-specific protein important for late thymocyte development. Nature immunology. 2009;10(8):840–7. pmid:19597498; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2848698.
  20. 20. Patrick MS, Oda H, Hayakawa K, Sato Y, Eshima K, Kirikae T, et al. Gasp, a Grb2-associating protein, is critical for positive selection of thymocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106(38):16345–50. pmid:19805304; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2752560.
  21. 21. Iwata R, Sasaki N, Agui T. Contiguous gene deletion of Ptprk and Themis causes T-helper immunodeficiency (thid) in the LEC rat. Biomedical research (Tokyo, Japan). 2010;31(1):83–7. Epub 2010/03/06. pmid:20203423.
  22. 22. Chabod M, Pedros C, Lamouroux L, Colacios C, Bernard I, Lagrange D, et al. A spontaneous mutation of the rat Themis gene leads to impaired function of regulatory T cells linked to inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(1):e1002461. pmid:22275874; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3261907.
  23. 23. Brockmeyer C, Paster W, Pepper D, Tan CP, Trudgian DC, McGowan S, et al. T cell receptor (TCR)-induced tyrosine phosphorylation dynamics identifies THEMIS as a new TCR signalosome component. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(9):7535–47. pmid:21189249; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3045008.
  24. 24. Erdenebayar N, Maekawa Y, Nishida J, Kitamura A, Yasutomo K. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase-kappa regulates CD4+ T cell development through ERK1/2-mediated signaling. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2009;390(3):489–93. pmid:19800317.
  25. 25. Stevenson WS, Best OG, Przybylla A, Chen Q, Singh N, Koleth M, et al. DNA methylation of membrane-bound tyrosine phosphatase genes in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Leukemia. 2014;28(4):787–93. pmid:24045499.
  26. 26. Paster W, Brockmeyer C, Fu G, Simister PC, de Wet B, Martinez-Riano A, et al. GRB2-mediated recruitment of THEMIS to LAT is essential for thymocyte development. Journal of immunology. 2013;190(7):3749–56. pmid:23460737; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3607403.
  27. 27. Andersen M, Lenhard B, Whatling C, Eriksson P, Odeberg J. Alternative promoter usage of the membrane glycoprotein CD36. BMC molecular biology. 2006;7:8. pmid:16515687; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1475603.
  28. 28. Bros M, Boissel JP, Godtel-Armbrust U, Forstermann U. Transcription of human neuronal nitric oxide synthase mRNAs derived from different first exons is partly controlled by exon 1-specific promoter sequences. Genomics. 2006;87(4):463–73. pmid:16413742.
  29. 29. Shabalina SA, Spiridonov AN, Spiridonov NA, Koonin EV. Connections between alternative transcription and alternative splicing in mammals. Genome biology and evolution. 2010;2:791–9. pmid:20889654; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2975443.
  30. 30. Shlyueva D, Stampfel G, Stark A. Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(4):272–86. pmid:24614317.
  31. 31. Lewis BP, Green RE, Brenner SE. Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(1):189–92. pmid:12502788; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC140922.
  32. 32. Mattick JS, Makunin IV. Non-coding RNA. Human molecular genetics. 2006;15:R17–29. pmid:16651366.
  33. 33. Jostins L, Ripke S, Weersma RK, Duerr RH, McGovern DP, Hui KY, et al. Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2012;491(7422):119–24. pmid:23128233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3491803.
  34. 34. Farh KK, Marson A, Zhu J, Kleinewietfeld M, Housley WJ, Beik S, et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature. 2015;518(7539):337–43. pmid:25363779; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4336207.
  35. 35. Lorenzi AR, Patterson AM, Pratt A, Jefferson M, Chapman CE, Ponchel F, et al. Determination of thymic function directly from peripheral blood: a validated modification to an established method. Journal of immunological methods. 2008;339(2):185–94. pmid:18854192; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2593795.