Figures
Abstract
Background and Purpose
Time is brain: benefits of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in ischemic stroke last for 4.5 hours but rapidly decrease as time progresses following symptom onset. The goal of the Acute Brain Care (ABC) intervention study was to reduce the door-to-needle time (DNT) to ≤30 minutes by optimizing in-hospital stroke treatment.
Methods
We performed a single-centre before (pre-intervention period: 2000–2005) versus after (post-intervention period: 2006–2012) comparison in a cohort of consecutive patients treated with IVT. The intervention consisted of the implementation of a multidisciplinary stroke protocol combining simple strategies to reduce the DNT. Primary endpoint was the DNT, presented as proportion ≤30 minutes and median time. Secondary clinical endpoints were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and favourable outcome defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRs) score of 0–2 at 3 months. Endpoints were additionally adjusted for baseline imbalances between the groups.
Results
In the pre-intervention period, none (0.0%) of the 100 patients (mean age 63.8 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 14) treated with IVT had a DNT ≤30 minutes compared to 234 (62.7%) of the 373 patients (mean age 66.7 years, median NIHSS score 10) in the post-intervention period (p<0.001). The median DNT decreased from 75 (IQR 60–105) to 28 minutes (IQR 20–37, p<0.001). SICH rate remained stable (3.0% versus 4.4%, OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.43─5.25; adjusted OR 5.47, 95% CI 0.69–42.12). The proportion of patients with a favourable outcome increased (38.9% versus 52.3%, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09–2.73) but lost statistical significance after adjustment (adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.82–2.61).
Citation: Zinkstok SM, Beenen LF, Luitse JS, Majoie CB, Nederkoorn PJ, Roos YB (2016) Thrombolysis in Stroke within 30 Minutes: Results of the Acute Brain Care Intervention Study. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166668
Editor: Olivier Baud, Hopital Robert Debre, FRANCE
Received: June 30, 2016; Accepted: November 2, 2016; Published: November 18, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Zinkstok et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase—either alone or followed by endovascular thrombectomy—is an effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke. [1,2] Benefits of IVT rapidly decrease as time progresses following symptom onset: the number needed to treat to recover without disabilities is 10 within the first 3 hours after symptom onset but doubles when patients are treated between 3 and 4.5 hours in a pooled analysis of randomised trials. [3] This time-dependent effectiveness has recently been confirmed in daily clinical practice. [4,5]
Guidelines recommend hospitals to achieve door-to-needle time (DNT), the time between hospital arrival and initiation of IVT of 60 minutes or less. [6,7] In daily practice, this limit is rarely met: the large observational Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry reports a median DNT of 67 minutes with no change in DNT during the 9-years registry period. [8] Even hospitals participating in the US ‘Get With the Guidelines-Stroke’ improvement program, reported DNTs was below 60 minutes in only half of the cases. [9] Knowing that every minute a large-vessel stroke goes untreated, an estimated 1.9 million neurons are potentially lost, [10] we should be more ambitious. It has been shown that for a 30-minutes faster treatment, patients have a 8% greater odds of walking independently at discharge, and a 6% greater odds of being discharged to home instead of to an institution. [5] Therefore, the Acute Brain Care (ABC) intervention study aimed to reduce the DNT to 30 minutes or less by optimizing in-hospital stroke treatment.
Methods
Study design, setting and population
The ABC-study was a before (pre-intervention period: Jan 1, 2000 to Dec 31, 2005) versus after (post-intervention period: July 1, 2006 to Dec 31, 2012) comparison in a cohort, carried out in the Academic Medical Center (AMC), a university hospital affiliated with the University of Amsterdam. The AMC is a primary centre for all neurological emergencies and serves as comprehensive stroke centre in a densely populated urban area in the Netherlands. The study population consisted of all consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients treated with IVT in the Emergency Department (ED). Patients could be referred by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), primary care physicians, other hospitals or arrived on the ED by self-referral. Patients with in-hospital strokes were excluded since the ABC-study protocol was only partially applicable since some procedures were already performed on the ward and strokes were often intervention-related, leading to a more individualized approach. Patients with complete resolution of symptoms upon arrival in the hospital, who subsequently developed a stroke after initial work-up, were considered as having an in-hospital stroke. At the start of the study in 2000, IVT was administered within 3 hours after stroke onset until publication of the European Canadian Acute Stroke Study III at the end of 2008, when treatment up to 4.5 hours was implemented. [9] Our study was conducted according to national legislations, and the medical ethics committee of the AMC permitted analysis of the anonymous patient data with waiver of informed consent.
Intervention
The study intervention consisted of the development and implementation of a multidisciplinary ABC-protocol between Jan 1 and June 30, 2006. This protocol with 24/7 coverage combines multiple simple strategies to reduce the DNT (Table 1).
See S1 Video for the operational ABC-protocol. Development of the protocol was guided by the observed delays in the pre-intervention period and international guidelines for trauma care and treatment in acute myocardial infarction. [11–13] In this 6 months period, no patients were included as the development process induced already a change of the prevailing procedures at that time, thereby diluting the effect of the intervention.
Acute Brain Care protocol: current procedures
After an educational program for the EMS staff including instructions to recognize stroke symptoms using the face arm speech time (FAST) scale and emphasis on the importance of rapid treatment, the EMS dispatchers assign possible stroke patients as the highest priority level. [14] Since time can be saved when institutional preparations are made prior to arrival of the patient, on-site paramedics notify the ED when they suspect an acute stroke. Upon notification, all members of the 24/7 in-hospital stroke team are collectively warned by a unique pager sound 10 minutes before estimated arrival of the patient. The stroke team consisted of a neurology resident, supervised by a (stroke) neurologist, neurology nurse, radiology resident, supervised by a (stroke) radiologist, radiology technician, and an emergency nurse. Patients are pre-registered in the hospital information system and laboratory tests are pre-ordered. The CT-scanner in the ED is a sliding gantry multislice CT which can be easily moved back and forth between two rooms, of which one is prepared ahead of time to guarantee direct availability of the CT-scan. During transport, paramedics obtain patients’ history, medication use and perform a point-of-care (POC) glucose test. Upon arrival, the paramedics transfer the patient straight onto the CT-table. Whereas in the pre-intervention period diagnostic work-up was performed in serial steps, after the intervention vital checks, brief neurological examination including the National Institutes Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and blood drawing are all performed simultaneously by the stroke team on the CT-table. In case of uncertainty about use of anticoagulants, a point of care (POC) INR (Coaguchek® XS, Roche, Almere, the Netherlands) measurement is performed. [15] Other laboratory results are no longer needed for the treatment decision if a patient is not known with a pre-existing illness that could affect haemostasis. After acquisition of a non-contrast cranial CT-scan, the radiologist interprets the CT-images immediately at the monitor. In the absence of contra-indications for IVT, patients are directly moved to a dedicated ABC-room adjacent to the CT-room. Here, patients are placed on a bed with built-in scales on which the patient is weighed. Previously, determination of the patients’ weight using a weight scale mat took more than 5 minutes. In the ABC-room, alteplase is prepared using predefined tables with weight-adjusted dosages. In case additional intra-arterial therapy is considered, patients are transported back to the CT-room for a CT-angiography during alteplase infusion. We have to note that since endovascular interventions have been proven effective [2] and are now standard of care, CT-Angiography is nowadays performed together with the non-contrast CT. When acute stroke is suspected in a hospitalized patient, the consulted neurology physician notifies the ED and arranges immediate transport to the CT-room. From that moment the same protocol is followed as if the patient had directly been presented to the ED.
Data collection, definitions and endpoints
Demographics and time intervals of consecutive IVT patients were prospectively collected. The DNT was defined as time between arrival of the ambulance at the AMC and initiation of IVT, i.e. bolus administration, directly followed by continuous infusion. [16] Onset-to-treatment time (OTT) was defined as the time between symptom onset or moment last known well and initiation of IVT. In case of fluctuating symptoms time of initial symptoms was considered as onset time. Of all patients entered into the ABC-protocol in the post-intervention period, final diagnosis, main reason to renounce IVT and reason for a prolonged DNT (i.e. >30 minutes) were prospectively registered and used for feedback in regular ABC-meetings, which were held every 3 months. Additional baseline characteristics, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH), defined as any CT-documented haemorrhage with a ≥4 points increase on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and final diagnosis of a stroke mimic were retrospectively abstracted from medical chart review for patients in the pre-intervention period, whereas these data were prospectively collected in a hospital-based stroke registry during the post-intervention period. [17] Modified Rankin scale (mRs) scores were obtained by a dedicated stroke nurse through a structured telephone interview with the patient or next of kin, hospital discharge letters when patient was referred to another hospital, consultation of general practitioner, or a combination, with a favourable outcome defined as a mRs score of 0–2. Primary endpoint was the DNT, reported as the proportion of DNT ≤30 minutes and as median time. Secondary endpoints were time intervals between symptom onset, hospital arrival, start of CT-scan and needle. Secondary clinical endpoints were SICH, functional outcome at 3 months (favourable outcome, mortality, and ordinal mRs score 0–5 among survivors), and patients with a stroke mimic. SICH, favourable outcome and mortality were analysed separately for patients treated within 180 minutes.
Statistical analysis
Baseline characteristics were compared using student t, χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests, where appropriate. Effect size on the proportions treated with a DNT of ≤30 was expressed as absolute difference between proportions. Median time intervals and ordinal mRs scores were compared between the periods using the Mann-Whitney U test. The effect on SICH and functional outcome was expressed as odds ratio’s (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). These ORs were additionally adjusted for the main prognostic variables (age, sex, pre-stroke independency (baseline mRs 0–2), and baseline NIHSS) using multivariable logistic regression (adjusted OR). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Results
During the pre-intervention period 102 patients were treated with IVT, of whom 2 were excluded because of an in-hospital stroke. No endovascular interventions were performed in this phase. During the post-intervention period, 1672 patients were entered into the ABC-protocol, of whom 990 (59.2%) were diagnosed with an ischemic stroke, and another 292 patients (17.4%) suffered an intracranial hemorrhage. Finally, 407 patients (24.3%) received IVT. After exclusion of 34 patients with an in-hospital stroke, 373 patients in the post-intervention period were available for analysis (Fig 1). Of these, 10 patients received an endovascular intervention after IVT. Baseline characteristics of patients in each period are presented in Table 2. In the post-intervention period, IVT patients were more often male, were less frequent independent prior to their stroke, and had lower NIHSS scores.
Legend: ABC indicates Acute Brain Care; IAT, intra-arterial therapy; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis. Ten patients who were not eligible for intravenous thrombolysis received intra-arterial therapy as primary treatment.
The number of patients with a DNT ≤30 minutes increased from 0 (0.0%) in the pre-intervention period to 234 patients (62.7%) in the post-intervention period (p<0.001, Fig 2a). The median DTN was reduced from 75 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 60 to 105) in the pre-intervention period to 28 minutes (IQR 20 to 37) in the post-intervention period (p<0.001). All median time intervals are presented in Table 3.
Legend: Door-to-needle time was missing in 2 patients (1 in each period). Onset-to-needle time was missing in 3 patients in the post-intervention period.
Although the ambulance-to-door time slightly decreased, onset-to-door time did not change after the intervention. Reduction of both the door-to-CT-time and the CT-to-needle-time contributed to the reduced DNT, with 29 and 20 minutes, respectively. As a consequence, the median OTT was reduced from 158 minutes (IQR 135 to 177) to 105 minutes (IQR 75 to 160) after the intervention (p<0.001). Fig 2b shows a shift towards ultra-early treatment after the intervention: the number of patients treated within 90 minutes after symptom onset increased from 3 (3.0%) to 149 patients (40.3%, p<0.001).
In Fig 3 the annual distribution of treatment delays is presented, showing that onset-to-door time did not vary over the years, whereas the DNT dropped down immediately after the intervention and remained stable afterwards. The annual number of patients treated with IVT increased from median 17 in the pre-intervention to 55 in the post-intervention period.
The reasons of a prolonged DNT (138 patients) in the post-intervention period is presented in Table 4.
Reasons for DNT >30 minutes were patient-related in 68 patients (49.3%). Main cause was uncertainty about the eligibility for IVT in 34 patients (24.6%), requiring additional information about the history, diagnostic studies (including CT angiography) or consultation of other physicians. The main logistic contributor to a prolonged DNT was delayed neurology consultation at the ED in 18 patients (13.0%). In these cases, patient arrived by self-referral or without prenotification of the ambulance. As these patients were no immediately recognized as a stroke at the emergency department, there was a substantial delay in the warning of the neurology physician and subsequent start of treatment. Reason for delay was not specified in 25 patients, due to relatively mild delay (DTN 35, IQR 32 to 40) in these patients.
The comparison of clinical endpoints is shown in Table 5. The number of patients with SICH remained stable: 3 (3.0%) in the pre-intervention period versus 16 (4.4%) in the post-intervention period (OR 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 5.25, after adjustment OR 5.47, 95% CI 0.69 to 43.12). After the intervention, more patients had favourable outcome at 3 months: 37 (38.9%) versus 190 (52.3%, OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.73), with loss of statistical significance after adjustment (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.82 to 2·61). Mortality at 3 months did not differ after the intervention (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.84, adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.48 to 2.04). Among survivors, ordinal mRs scores improved (Fig 4a, p = 0.004). These clinical results were not altered when analysis was restricted to patients with ONT ≤180 minutes (Table 5, Fig 4b). Regarding the final diagnosis, no patients with a stroke mimic could be identified in the pre-intervention period, whereas 14 patients (3.8%) had a stroke mimic in the post-intervention period (p = 0.05). None of these stroke mimics experienced a SICH.
Legend: mRs indicates modified Rankin scale. MRs scores were missing in 15 patients (5 pre-intervention, 10 post-intervention). Mann-Whitney U test on the mRs score 0–5 among survivors: p = 0.004; for patients treated within 180 minutes: p = 0.04.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that it is feasible to reduce the DNT to less than 30 minutes by optimizing in-hospital stroke treatment. This reduction was sustained given the stable DNT over the 6.5 years following the intervention. Patients were treated at earlier time points without safety concerns. The proportion of patients with a favourable outcome increased but this was largely explained by baseline imbalances between the groups. As a consequence of the focus on rapid treatment, the proportion of patients with a stroke mimic that received IVT increased, but our reported rate of 3.8% is still in the lower range of stroke mimic rates reported from other centres. [17]
The main strength of our study in a daily care setting was the comprehensive data collection that enabled in-depth analysis of the whole process and its long-term effects. We have demonstrated that 77% of all referred patients were finally diagnosed with stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic, which is high compared to reported rates of correct stroke identification by EMS ranging from 45 to 62% [18–21]. The high accuracy in our study can be explained by the following: training of EMS staff including use of a standardized stroke recognition protocol (FAST), the possibility of telephone consultation of the neurologist before referral, and direct feedback as patient’s evaluation mostly takes place in the presence of EMS paramedics. The reduction in DNT was largely explained by a reduction in door-to-CT time, as several actions take place at the same time, whereas in the pre-intervention period these were serial processes. In order to keep attention towards minimal delays and to identify obstacles that caused treatment delay, regular ABC-meetings are organised every 3 months. Feedback on suboptimal performance has been shown to improve the DNT. [22] For example, we observed a delay in neurology consultation in self-referred patients at the ED. When a more extended triage protocol was introduced at the ED, this problem largely diminished. This might explain the further reduction of the DNT as was observed in the last 3 years.
Several multifaceted intervention protocols aiming to reduce the in-hospital delays have been described, with reported DNTs varying between 20 and 74 minutes. [9, 23–30] Best results were obtained in Helsinki, where in the final year a median DNT of 20 minutes was achieved by “doing as much as possible before the patient has arrived while doing as little as possible after the patient has arrived at the hospital”. [26] Compared to our latest DNT of 24 minutes, this 4-minutes difference can be explained by the lack of state-wide electronic patient records in our country and no separate analysis in our study of patients with basilar artery occlusion, in whom DNT was longer. [26] In our protocol, a small delay is introduced by the weighing procedure. We felt that weighing was necessary as weight estimation is known to be highly unreliable, [31] and both alteplase underdosage and overdosage negatively affect outcome. [31,32] By using a bed with built-in scales, we follow a safe procedure with minimal delay. Additional delay is caused by our procedure to initiate IVT in the ABC-room instead of the CT-room in order to guarantee immediate alteplase infusion after bolus administration. Although introducing a delay between bolus and infusion creates time for patient transport or weighing without influencing the DNT, serum tissue plasminogen activator levels decrease when the bolus-infusion interval is longer than 5 minutes, and can consequently reduce the efficacy of IVT. [33] For correct interpretation and comparisons of reported DNT between hospitals a uniform definition of the needle-time is warranted. [16]
Our study has several limitations. First, the before-and-after design of our study cannot foresee that endpoints are influenced by external factors, like extending of the time window to 4.5 hours by the end of 2008. We therefore repeated analysis of clinical endpoints for patients treated within 3 hours after symptom onset, which showed similar results. More important was that the study population has changed over time: post-intervention patients were less often independent prior to their stroke, whilst having less severe strokes. This can be explained by a less stringent attitude towards contra-indications during the study period, as increasing experience with IVT reassured us about the safety concerns in common clinical situations. [34] Eligibility of patients with minor symptoms for IVT has been redefined recently, stating that “patients experiencing improvement of any degree, but having a persisting neurological deficit that is potentially disabling, should be treated”. [35] For these reasons, we adjusted clinical outcome for main prognostic variables, thereby losing power of our analysis. Consequently, we were not able to demonstrate that outcome has improved after intervention for the adjusted outcomes, although there is no doubt early treatment is beneficial. Secondly, we cannot compare the IVT rate between the periods as not all patients with possible acute stroke were collected in the pre-intervention period. A third point of concern is the external validity since this study was conducted in a single-centre academic setting. As patients were primarily referred by the EMS, our population does not differ from a non-academic population. Moreover, the simple strategies we implemented are not specific for our hospital, and can be reproduced elsewhere.
To summarize, important and sustained reduction of DNT to less than 30 minutes can be safely achieved by optimizing in-hospital stroke work flow and treatment. With its simple strategies, the ABC-protocol is a pragmatic framework to reduce in-hospital delays in time-dependent stroke treatment. This protocol can easily be adopted by clinicians in everyday care.
Supporting Information
S1 Video. Acute Brain Care Amsterdam.
This 2-mins video movie of the operational Acute Brain Care protocol.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166668.s001
(M4V)
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Jan Stam and Rien Vermeulen for their support in the development of the Acute Brain Care protocol. We thank Jonne van Overbeeke-Bakker and Jolien Francken for their help with the data collection and case review.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: YBR JSL CBM PJN.
- Data curation: SMZ LFB.
- Formal analysis: SMZ.
- Investigation: SMZ LFB.
- Methodology: YBR.
- Project administration: SMZ LFB.
- Supervision: YBR.
- Writing – original draft: SMZ LFB.
- Writing – review & editing: YBR JSL CBM PJN.
References
- 1. Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, del Zoppo GJ. Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29; (7):CD000213. pmid:25072528
- 2. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016; 387: 1723–1731. pmid:26898852
- 3. Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2014; 384: 1929–1935. pmid:25106063
- 4. Gumbinger C, Reuter B, Stock C, Sauer T, Wiethölter H, Bruder I, et al. Time to treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and outcome of stroke in clinical practice: retrospective analysis of hospital quality assurance data with comparison with results from randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 2014 May 30;348:g3429. pmid:24879819
- 5. Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepulveda MJ, Pan W, et al. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013; 309: 2480–2488. pmid:23780461
- 6. European Stroke Organisation(ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008; 25: 457–507. pmid:18477843
- 7. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ, Demaerschalk BM, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013; 44: 870–947. pmid:23370205
- 8. Strbian D, Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Lees KR, Toni D, Roffe C, et al. Trends in Door-to-Thrombolysis Time in Safe Implementation of Stroke Thrombolysis Registry: effect of center volume and duration of registry membership. Stroke. 2015; 45: 1275–1280.
- 9. Fonarow GC, Zhao X, Smith EE, Saver JL, Reevers MJ, Bhatt DL, et al. Door-to-needle times for tissue plasminogen activator administration and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke before and after a quality improvement initiative. JAMA. 2014; 311: 1632–1640. pmid:24756513
- 10. Saver JL.Time is brain—quantified. Stroke. 2006; 37: 263–266 pmid:16339467
- 11. Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 7: the era of reperfusion: section 1: acute coronary syndromes (acute myocardial infarction). The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation. 2000; 102: I172–I203. pmid:10966673
- 12.
Committee on Trauma, American College of Surgeons. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®) for physicians (7th edn). Chicago, USA: American College of Surgeons; 2004.
- 13. Werf van de F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24:28–66. pmid:12559937
- 14. Harbison J, Massey A, Barnett L, Hodge D, Ford GA. Rapid ambulance protocol for acute stroke. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1935. pmid:10371574
- 15. Green TL, Mansoor A, Newcommon N, Stephenson C, Stewart E, Hill MD. Reliability of point-of-care testing of INR in acute stroke. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008; 35: 348–351. pmid:18714804
- 16. Kruyt ND, Nederkoorn PJ, Dennis M, Leys D, Ringleb PA, Rudd AG, et al. Door-to-needle time and the proportion of patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: uniform interpretation and reporting. Stroke. 2013; 44: 3249–3253. pmid:24052509
- 17. Zinkstok SM, Engelter ST, Gensicke H, Lyrer PA, Ringleb PA, Artto V, et al. Safety of thrombolysis in stroke mimics: results from a multicenter cohort study. Stroke. 2013; 44: 1080–1084. pmid:23444310
- 18. El Husseini N, Goldstein LB. Code stroke: hospitalized versus emergency department patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013; 22: 345–348. pmid:22206693
- 19. Studnek JR, Asimos A, Dodds J, Swanson D. Assessing the validity of the Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale and the medic prehospital assesment for code stroke in an urban emergency medical services agency. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013; 17: 348–353. pmid:23495755
- 20. Oostema JA, Konen J, Chassee T, Nasiri M, Reeves MJ. Clinical predictors of accurate stroke recognition. Stroke. 2015; 46: 1513–1517. pmid:25922507
- 21. Brandler ES, Sharma M, McCullough F, Ben Eli D, Kauman B, Khandelwal P, et al. Prehospital stroke identification: factors associated with diagnostic accuracy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015; 24: 2161–6. pmid:26159643
- 22. Ghrooda E, Alcock S, Jackson AC. Improvement in thrombolytic therapy administration in acute stroke with feedback. Can J Neurol Sci. 2012; 39: 789–792. pmid:23041399
- 23. Sohn SW, Park HS, Cha JK, Nah HW, Kim DH, et al. A systemized stroke code significantly reduced time intervals for using intravenous tissue plasminogen activator under magnetic resonance imaging screening. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015; 24: 465–472. pmid:25524016
- 24. Kim SK, Lee SY, Bae HJ, Lee YS, Kim SY, Khang MJ, et al. Pre-hospital notification reduced the door-to-needle time for iv t-PA in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16: 1331–1335. pmid:19832903
- 25. Kohrmann M, Schellinger PD, Breuer L, Dhorn M, Kuramatsu JB, Blinzier C, et al. Avoiding in hospital delays and eliminating the three-hour effect in thrombolysis for stroke. Int J Stroke. 2011; 6: 493–497. pmid:21609415
- 26. Meretoja A, Strbian D, Mustanoja S, Tatlisumak T, Lindsberg PJ, Kaste M. Reducing in-hospital delay to 20 minutes in stroke thrombolysis. Neurology. 2012; 79: 306–313. pmid:22622858
- 27. Ruff IM, Ali SF, Goldstein JN, Lev M, Copen WA, McIntyre J, et al. Improving Door-to-Needle Times: A Single Center Validation of the Target Stroke Hypothesis. Stroke. 2014; 45: 504–508. pmid:24399372
- 28. Sattin JA, Olson SE, Liu L, Raman R, Lyden PD. An expedited code stroke protocol is feasible and safe. Stroke. 2006; 37: 2935–2939. pmid:17095736
- 29. Van Schaik SM, Van der Veen B, Van den Berg-Vos RM, Weinstein HC, Bosboom WM. Achieving a door-to-needle time of 25 minutes in thrombolysis for acute stroke: a quality improvement project. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014; 23: 2900–2906. pmid:25263647
- 30. Chen C-H, Tang S-C, Tsai L-K, Hsieh MJ, Yeh SJ, Huang KY, et al. Stroke code improves intravenous thrombolysis administration in acute ischemic stroke. PloS One. 2014; 9:e104862. pmid:25111200
- 31. Breuer L, Nowe T, Huttner HB, Blinzier C, Kollmar R, Schellinger PD, et al. Weight approximation in stroke before thrombolysis: the WAIST-Study: a prospective observational "dose-finding" study. Stroke. 2010; 41: 2867–2871. pmid:21071723
- 32. Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lessafre E, von Kummer R, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995; 274: 1017–1025. pmid:7563451
- 33. Smith C, Al-Nuaimi Y, Wainwright J, Sherrington C, Singh A, Kallingal J, et al. The influence of bolus to infusion delays on plasma Tissue Plasminogen Activator levels. Int J Stroke. 2014; 9: 939–942. pmid:23205632
- 34. Frank B, Grotta JC, Alexandrov AV, Bluhmki E, Lyden P, Meretoja A, et al. Thrombolysis in stroke despite contraindications or warnings? Stroke. 2013; 44: 727–733. pmid:23391774
- 35. Re-examing Acute Eligibility for Thrombolysis (TREAT) Task Force, Levine SR, Khatri P, Broderick JP, Grotta JC, Kasner SE, et al. Review, historical context, and clarifications of the NINDS rt-PA stroke trials exclusion criteria: Part 1: rapidly improving stroke symptoms. Stroke. 2013; 44: 2500–2505. pmid:23847249