Figures
Abstract
Background
HBeAg seroconversion is an important intermediate outcome in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. This study aimed to compare the effect of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) on HBeAg seroconversion in treating CHB with lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir.
Methods
Network meta-analysis of NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 1–2 years of treatment was performed. In addition, NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 3–5 years of treatment was systematically evaluated.
Results
A total of 31 articles were included in this study. Nine and five studies respectively reporting on 1- and 2-year treatment were included in our network meta-analysis. In addition, 6, 5, and 5 studies, respectively reporting on 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatment were included in our systematic evaluation. Telbivudine showed a significantly higher HBeAg seroconversion rate after a 1 year treatment period compared to the other NAs (odds ratio (OR) = 3.99, 95% CI 0.68–23.6). This was followed by tenofovir (OR = 3.36, 95% CI 0.70–16.75). Telbivudine also showed a higher seroconversion rate compared to the other NAs after a 2 year treatment period, (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 0.92–2.22). This was followed by entecavir (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.72–1.72). No significant difference was observed between spontaneous induction and long-term telbivudine treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion. However, entecavir and tenofovir treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversions were significantly lower than spontaneous seroconversion.
Conclusion
Long-term treatment with potent anti-HBV drugs, especially tenofovir and entecavir, may reduce HBeAg seroconversion compared with spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion rate. Telbivudine treatment, whether short term or long term, is associated with higher HBeAg seroconversion compared with the other NAs. However, the high rates of drug resistance likely limit the application of telbivudine.
Citation: Xing T, Xu H, Cao L, Ye M (2017) HBeAg Seroconversion in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analog Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0169444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169444
Editor: Ferruccio Bonino, Universita degli Studi di Pisa, ITALY
Received: October 25, 2016; Accepted: December 17, 2016; Published: January 20, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Xing et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) naturally involves an alternating process of repeated hepatitis occurrence and disease remission. Interaction and mutual influences between the virus and immune system determines the progression and clinical outcome of CHB [1]. HBeAg, an important antigen expressed by hepatitis B virus (HBV), has been suggested to inhibit the immune function of the host [2]. CHB progression involves either spontaneous or treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion, with the latter often associated with clinical remission to achieve the inactive virus carrier state. Therefore, HBeAg seroconversion is not only a hallmark of HBeAg-positive CHB patients but also speculated as an important indicator for anti-HBV therapy [3].
Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) are common anti-HBV drugs. Five NAs, namely, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir, are currently used to treat CHB [4]. The mechanism of action of NAs involves inhibition of viral replication through direct inhibition of DNA polymerase activity, reducing the reuse of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and transcription of pregenomic RNA, as well as through indirect effect on HBeAg synthesis. Short-term treatment of HBeAg-positive CHB patients can increase the rate of HBeAg seroconversion. By contrast, long-term treatment increases the histological improvement and regression of fibrosis thus improves the prognosis of CHB patients [5]. However, inhibition of viral replication can disrupt the homeostasis between the virus and immune system of the host, affecting the immune response and probably producing negative effects on HBeAg seroconversion [6].
Entecavir and tenofovir are the most effective anti-HBV drugs, followed by telbivudine and lamivudine, whereas adefovir dipivoxil is the least effective of the five drugs. Entecavir and tenofovir are recommended as first-line therapy for adults with immune-active CHB by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver [4, 7, 8]. However, HBeAg seroconversion rates are different in patients with treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive CHB after 1–2 year of oral NA therapy. The meta-analysis performed by Dakin et al. showed that administering more effective anti-HBV drugs does not increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate [9]. The meta-analysis by Wiens et al. showed that tenofovir exerts the strongest inducing effect on HBeAg seroconversion after 1 year of treatment [10]. Moreover, no study has systematically evaluated the effect of long-term treatment on HBeAg seroconversion thus far. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis on NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 1–2 years of treatment. In addition, NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion after 3–5 years of treatment was systematically evaluated.
Methods
Search strategy
The data used in this research were obtained from PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: HBeAg-positive CHB and Entecavir (ETV) or lamivudine (LAM) or Telbivudine (LDT) or Tenofovir (TDF) or Adefovir (ADF), HBeAg seroconversion, and randomized controlled trial (RCT). Studies involving special population groups (see below in inclusion and exclusion criteria) and drugs used in combination were not included. All analyses were based on previous published studies, no ethical approval and patient consent are required.
Studies published from 2000 to 2015 were included. Recent publications were also searched manually. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with durations of approximately 1–2 years were included. In addition, open-label and prospective cohort studies with a duration of approximately 3–5 years were included. One year is defined as 48 or 52 weeks. In addition, spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion of long term follow-up was conducted from manual search results.
Data collection
Data were extracted and evaluated by two independent reviewers. Reviewers resolved discrepancies through discussion. Studies with a Jadad score [11] of lower than 3 points were excluded. HBeAg seroconversion was the unique index evaluated in this study. We extracted data on study characteristics, patient characteristics, intervention details, and HBeAg seroconversion rate.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) HBeAg-positive adult CHB patients; (2) NA-naive patients; (3) NA monotherapy; and (4) drug dosages were those generally recommended by international guidelines. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) drug resistance at the beginning of treatment with NAs; (2) other special population groups, such as children, pregnant, and breast-feeding women, and those receiving immune inhibitor therapy; and (3) patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using Addis software version 1.16.5 (Drug IS.org, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the odds ratios (ORs) of the treatments and to rank the therapeutic regimens to determine their HBeAg seroconversion rate. In the absence of significant inconsistency, the relative effects of the interventions were analyzed using a consistency model based on a random-effects Bayesian model provided by the ADDIS software. The analysis results are presented as ORs with associated 95% confidence intervals, as well as estimated probabilities for the interventions in descending order. This meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis(PRISM) statement(S1 PRISMA Checklist) [12].
Results
Search results and summary of studies
In our preliminary search for relevant literature, we identified 196 articles, which included 64 articles from MEDLINE, 120 from EMBASE, and 12 from Cochrane Library. A total of 138 articles were excluded after screening their titles and abstracts. A total of 29 articles were excluded after reading their full text (including conference abstracts from the EMBASE database). Two recently published articles found through manual search were included. Fig 1 describes the details of the selection process. Finally, 31 articles were included in this meta-analysis [13–43]. Nine and six articles respectively reporting on 1- and 2-year treatments were included in our network meta-analysis. In addition, 6, 5, and 5 articles respectively reporting on 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatments were systematically evaluated.
Characteristics of the included studies
Nine studies involving 3,569 patients and reporting on 1-year treatment met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis [13–21]. Eight studies were multi-center RCTs, and one study is single-center RCT. Six and three studies were performed within 48 and 52 weeks, respectively (Table 1). Six studies involving 2,417 patients and reporting on 2-year treatment met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review and meta-analysis [22–27]. Five studies were multi-center RCTs, and one was an open-label study (Table 2). Most of the 3–5-year long studies were open-label studies in addition to one RCT and four prospective cohort studies (Tables 3–5) [28–43]. The range of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was more than 1.0–1.3 upper limit of normal (ULN) and lower than 10 ULN. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of HBV DNA was 20 IU/ml (~100 copies/ml) to 400 copies/ml, whereas that reported in several early studies was 1.6–3.78 pg/ml.
Network meta-analysis of HBeAg-positive CHB patients after 1-year treatment with NAs
Fig 2 shows the network of evidence indicating that 12 possible comparisons could be made, five of which were examined directly in one or more trials. Table 6 shows the ORs of HBeAg seroconversion after 1-year treatment as revealed by network meta-analysis. With regard to HBeAg seroconversion after 1-year treatment, telbivudine achieved a significantly higher rate than the other NAs (OR = 3.99, 95% CI 0.68–23.6) followed by tenofovir (OR = 3.36, 95% CI 0.70–16.75). Placebo achieved the lowest. Fig 3 shows the probabilities of each drug ranked as the choice drug for HBeAg seroconversion.
Lines represent direct (head-to-head) comparisons.
Network meta-analysis of HBeAg-positive CHB patients after a 2-year treatment with NAs
Fig 4 shows the network of evidence indicating that six possible comparisons could be made, four of which were studied directly in one or more trials. Table 7 shows the ORs of HBeAg seroconversion after 2-year treatment as revealed by network meta-analysis. Regarding HBeAg seroconversion after a 2-year treatment, telbivudine achieved a significantly higher rate than the other NAs (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 0.92–2.22) followed by entecavir (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.72–1.72). Fig 5 shows the probabilities of each drug to be ranked as the choice drug for HBeAg seroconversion.
Lines represent direct (head-to-head) comparisons.
HBeAg seroconversion of HBeAg-positive CHB patients after 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatments with NAs
Most of the studies were open-label and prospective cohort studies. Table 8 shows the HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB patients after 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatments with lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir. Telbivudine was the most effective among the five drugs. In addition, no significant differences were observed between spontaneous seroconversion and telbivudine-induced HBeAg seroconversion. However, HBeAg seroconversion induced by entecavir and tenofovir treatment was significantly lower than spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion.
Discussion
Although several studies have shown that short-term NA treatment in CHB patients may improve HBV-specific T cell response [44, 45], NA by itself generally does not exert immune regulation function. Recently, Li et al. [46] reported that NA-mediated HBV suppression can downregulate the production of negative regulators of host immunity during the first 24 weeks of therapy and can partially restore the ability of CD8 T cells to secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. This immune-modulating response may be correlated with the levels of both HBV DNA and HBeAg, but not with NAs. The results of our network meta-analysis suggested that HBeAg seroconversion rates were highest with telbivudine treatment followed by tenofovir therapy. This result is consistent with those from previous studies [47, 48]. The study by Wilens et al. showed that tenofovir was the most effective in inducing HBeAg seroconversion; however, patients receiving combination treatment and who were resistant to drugs were included in that study possibly influencing the accuracy of the results [10]. Given the lack of head-to-head research, the clinical baseline characteristics (e.g., HBV DNA, ALT level, and age) for NA treatment in CHB patients may affect the relative efficacy of drugs. Mealing et al. [49] found that when no adjustment was made to account for the differences in baseline viral load among trials, tenofovir was significantly better than entecavir in terms of achieving undetectable viral load after 1-year treatment. However, when they accounted for the impact of baseline viral load, the difference between the two treatments was not significant. ALT levels are positively correlated with the possibility of HBeAg seroconversion. Yuen et al. [50] found that the cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rate significantly increased with ALT levels and suggested that high rate of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion should be considered when treatment for patients with very high ALT levels is initiated.
The effects of long-term NA treatment on immune function of CHB patients remain unclear. Boni et al. [51] showed that T cell activity could be restored in patients with suppressed HBV infection following long-term NA treatment in vitro despite prolonged exposure to high antigen loads. In this report, when compared with spontaneous induction, HBeAg seroconversion rate was lower in patients who received long-term NA treatment, especially tenofovir and entecavir (40% and 44% after 5-year treatment, respectively). A real world study on the use of lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine to treat HBeAg-positive CHB patients for 6 years showed that the HBeAg seroconversion rate was 20.0% to 31.6%, although their difference was not statistically significant (X2 = 5.81, P = 0.214) [52]. These results were significantly lower (41.3%, 47.6%, and 53.5%, after 3-, 4-, and 5-year treatments, respectively) than the reported results for spontaneous induction [50]. Long-term NA treatment is speculated to negatively affect the recovery of immune function among CHB patients. Our results show that the rate of the long-term telbivudine treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion is relatively higher than the other four NAs. However, the drug resistance rate of telbivudine increases with prolonged treatment time, thereby limiting its application [53]. Kranidioti et al. [54] reported that HBV reactivation after withdrawal of NA treatment may contribute to the clearance of HBV associated with disappearance of HBsAg. Most patients who receive anti-HBV NA therapy require more than 10 years to be HBsAg-free, supporting the opposite point of view presented above.
The persistence of HBeAg seroconversion is important for long-term remission of the disease. Spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion may be more stable. The duration of NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion was shorter than that induced by interferon-α [55]. Reijnders et al. [56] found that in 132 cases of NA-treated HBeAg-positive CHB patients, the median duration of treatment was 26 months, and 42 cases displayed HBeAg seroconversion. After a median follow-up of 59 months, 13/42 (31%) cases displayed lasting HBeAg seroconversion. Therefore, these results suggested that most HBeAg seroconversion induced by NA therapy is temporary. Long-term treatment regardless of HBeAg seroconversion is necessary. The functionality of T cells with chronic HBV infection is inhibited by the presence of a large number of viral antigens [57]. Application of antiviral drugs to reduce the viral load may thus increase the reactivity of HBV-specific T cells. However, these drugs may also reduce the amount of viral antigens to stimulate immune responses and influence the recovery of immune response function. For instance, in early lamivudine treatment, HBV-specific T cells could be detected, but the recovery of T cell activity was partial and transient, and generally disappeared within approximately 6 months and could not increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate [58]. Long-term NA treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion rate decreased in this study. Hence, premature intervention with NAs is apparently not conducive for HBeAg seroconversion, and affects the efficiency of treatment to a certain degree for HBeAg-positive CHB patients. This issue needs to be considerated during the clinical practice of HBeAg-positive CHB treatment with NAs, especially for CHB patients with mild disease.
Although this study included RCTs with 1 or 2 years of treatment, long-term effects of these treatments were evaluated with open-label study and cohort studies due to the unethical and infeasibility of withholding long-term treatment in the control group. In the selected RCT, the difference in detection method and lower limits of quantification of HBV DNA may affect the results. The dosages and routes of administration described in specific clinical protocols are different, such as the dosage of entecavir used at the 5 year was 1.0 mg (frequently used 0.5 mg). In addition, the rate of viral resistance was higher in lamivudine and telbivudine used in earlier treatment periods, especially during long-term treatment. This factor may impact the rate of HBeAg seroconversion to a certain extent. HBeAg seroconversion were influenced by the level of ALT, age etc.[59]. Spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion rate was from the a large natural population [50]. The ranges of ALT and age are 1ULN to 6820U/L and 1 to 85 year, respectively. However, the ranges of ALT and age in most of clinical trials are 1.3 ULN to 10ULN and 15 to 65 year, respectively. These differences might affect the comparability of the HBeAg seroconversion rate between the real world study and cilinical trials.
In conclusion, long-term treatment with potent anti-HBV drugs, especially tenofovir and entecavir, may reduce HBeAg seroconversion compared with spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion rate. Telbivudine is associated with higher HBeAg seroconversion compared with the other NAs in both short- or long-term treatment. However, the high rate of drug resistance potentially limits the application of telbivudine.
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: TX.
- Data curation: LC MY.
- Formal analysis: TX LC.
- Funding acquisition: TX.
- Investigation: LC MY.
- Methodology: LC MY.
- Project administration: HX.
- Resources: LC MY.
- Software: MY LC.
- Supervision: HX.
- Validation: TX LC.
- Visualization: MY LC.
- Writing – original draft: TX.
- Writing – review & editing: HX.
References
- 1. Yim HJ, Lok AS (2006) Natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: what we knew in 1981 and what we know in 2005. Hepatology 43:S173–181. pmid:16447285
- 2. Lang T, Lo C, Skinner N, Locarnini S, Visvanathan K, Mansell A. (2011) The hepatitis B e antigen (HbeAg) targets and suppress activation of the toll-like receptor signaling pathway. J Hepatol 55: 762–769. pmid:21334391
- 3. Liaw YF (2009) HBeAg seroconversion as an important end point in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatol Int 3:425–433. pmid:19669245
- 4. European Association For The Study Of The Liver (2012) EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 57:167–185. pmid:22436845
- 5. Su TH, Kao JH (2015) Improving clinical outcomes of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:141–154. pmid:25241970
- 6. Zhang Z, Zhang JY, Wang LF, Wang FS (2012) Immunopathogenesis and prognostic immune markers of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:223–230. pmid:22004062
- 7. Terrault NA, Bzowej NH, Chang KM, Hwang JP, Jonas MM, Murad MH. (2016) AASLD guideline for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 63: 261–283. pmid:26566064
- 8. Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (2016) Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update Hepatol Int 10:1–98.
- 9. Dakin H, Fidler C, Harper C (2010) Mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis evaluating the relative efficacy of nucleos(t)ides for treatment of nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B. Value Health 3:934–945.
- 10. Wiens A, Lenzi L, Venson R, Correr CJ, Rotta I, Pedroso ML, et al. (2013) Comparative efficacy of oral nucleoside or nucleotide analog monotherapy used in chronic hepatitis B: a mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 33:144–151. pmid:23359454
- 11. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavagham DJ, et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12. pmid:8721797
- 12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. pmid:19621072
- 13. Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, et al. (2006) A comparison of entecavir and lamivu dine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 354: 1001–1010. pmid:16525137
- 14. Yao GB, Zhu M, Wang YM, Xu DZ, Tan DM, Chen CW, et al. (2006) A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled study of entecavir versus lamivudine for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 45:891–895. pmid:17313873
- 15. Hou J,Yin YK, Xu D, Tan D, Niu J, Zhou X, et al. (2008) Telbivudine versus lamivudine in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B: Results at 1 year of a randomized, double-blind trial. Hepatology 47:447–454. pmid:18080339
- 16. Lai CL, Gane E, Liaw YF, Hsu CW, Thongsawat S, Wang Y, et al. (2007) Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis b. N Engl J Med 357:2576–2588. pmid:18094378
- 17. Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, Gane E, de Man RA, Krastev Z, et al. (2008) Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis b. N Engl J Med 359:2442–2455. pmid:19052126
- 18. Sriprayoon T, Lueangarun S, Suwanwela C, Pattaranutaporn P, Tanwandee T (2012) Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus tenofovir treatment in chronic hepatitis b patients: A randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 142: S695.
- 19. Hou JL, Gao ZL, Xie Q, Zhang JM, Sheng JF, Cheng J, et al. (2015) Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat 22:85–93. pmid:25243325
- 20. Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, Tong MJ, Sievert W, Shiffman ML, et al. (2003) Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 348:808–816. pmid:12606735
- 21. Zeng MD, Mao YM, Yang GB, Zhou XQ, Wang H, Xu DZ, et al. (2006) Adefovir dipivovil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B in China. China J Infect Dis 23: 387–394.
- 22. Gish RG, Lok AS, Chang TT, de Man RA, Gadano A, Sollano J, et al. (2007) Entecavir therapy for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 133:1437–1444. pmid:17983800
- 23. Yao GB, Chen CW, Lu WL, Ren H, Tan D, Wang Y, et al. (2008) Virologic, serologic, and biochemical outcomes through 2 years of treatment with entecavir and lamivudine in nucleoside-naïve Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B: A randomized, multicenter study. Hepatology International 2:486–493. pmid:19669324
- 24. Jia JD, Hou JL, Yin YK, Tan DM, Xu D, Niu JQ, et al. (2014) Two-year results of a randomized, phase III comparative trial of telbivudine versus lamivudine in Chinese patients. Hepatology International 8: 72–82. pmid:26202408
- 25. Liaw YF, Gane E, Leung N, Zeuzem S, Wang Y, Lai CL, et al. (2009) 2-Year GLOBE trial results: telbivudine Is superior to lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 136:486–495. pmid:19027013
- 26. Chen EQ, Zhou TY, Liu L, Liu C, Lei M, Tang H. (2011) A comparison of treatment with adefovir and entecavir for chronic hepatitis b in china: the 2-year results of a prospective study: adefovir versus entercavir for chronic hepatitis b. Hepat Mon 11:27–31. pmid:22087113
- 27. Heathcote EJ, Gane E, deMan R (2008) Two year tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) switch data in HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B(study 103), preliminary analysis. Hepatology 48: 376A.
- 28. Leung NW, Lai CL, Chang TT, Guan R, Lee CM, Ng KY, et al. (2001) Extended lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B enhances hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rates: results after 3 years of therapy. Hepatology 33: 1527–1532. pmid:11391543
- 29. Ling N, Zhou Z, Zhang DZ, Ren H (2007) Three year adefovir dipivoxil treatment for hepatitis b e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis b patients. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 15:346–349. pmid:17524266
- 30. Gane EJ, Wang Y, Liaw YF, Hou J, Thongsawat S, Wan M, et al. (2011) Efficacy and safety of prolonged 3-year telbivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int 31:676–684. pmid:21457439
- 31. Yao GB, Ren H, Xu DZ, Zhou XQ, Jia JD, Wang YM, et al. (2010) Virological, serological and biochemical outcomes through 3 years of entecavir treatment in nucleoside-naive Chinese chronic hepatitis B patients. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 17:51–58.
- 32. Sriprayoon T (2015) A randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of entecavir versus tenofovir treatment in naïve chronic hepatitis b patients. Gastroenterology 148: S502.
- 33. Heathcote EJ, Marcellin P, Buti M, Gane E, De Man RA, Krastev Z, et al. (2011) Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 140:132–143. pmid:20955704
- 34. Chang TT, Lai CL, Chien RN, Guan R, Lim SG, Lee CM, et al. (2004) Four years of lamivudine treatment in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:1276–1282. pmid:15482535
- 35. Liang JY, Yang XA, Zhang K, Chen LB, Shu X, Xu QH. (2011) A clinical study on the efficacy of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil for 4 years. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi 25:384–386. pmid:22338232
- 36. Wang Y, Thongsawat S, Gane EJ, Liaw YF, Jia J, Hou J, et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of continuous 4-year telbivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat 20:e37–46. pmid:23490388
- 37. Chen X (2013) Effect of telbivudine and entecavir on HBeAg positive chronie hepatitis B: A 4-year follow-up. Hepatology International 7:S195–196.
- 38. Heathcote EJ, Gane E, deMan R, Chan S, George J, Tsai NC, et al. (2010) Long Term (4 Year) Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment in HBeAg-Positive Patients (HBeAg+) with Chronic Hepatitis B(Study 103). Hepatology 52:556A.
- 39. Yao GB, Zhu M, Cui ZY, Wang BE, Yao JL, Zeng MD. (2009) A 7-year study of lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B virus e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients in China. Journal of Digestive Diseases 10: 131–137. pmid:19426396
- 40. Minde Z, Yimin M, Guangbi Y, JinLin H, Hao W, Hong R, et al. (2012) Five years of treatment with adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Liver International 32: 137–146. pmid:22097972
- 41. Zhang Y, Hu P, Qi X, Ren H, Mao RC, Zhang JM. (2016) A comparison of telbivudine and entecavir in the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients: a prospective cohort study in China. Clin Microbiol Infect 22: 287.e1–9.
- 42. Chang TT, Lai CL, Kew Yoon S, Lee SS, Coelho HS, Carrilho FJ, et al. (2010) Entecavir treatment for up to 5 years in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 51:422–430. pmid:20049753
- 43. Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, Afdhal N, Sievert W, Jacobson IM, et al. (2013) Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet 381:468–475. pmid:23234725
- 44. Chen Y, Li X, Ye B, Yang X, Wu W, Chen B, et al. (2011) Effect of telbivudine therapy on the cellular immune response in chronic hepatitis B. Antiviral Res 91:23–31. pmid:21549152
- 45. Bertoletti A, Ferrari C(2012) Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Gut 61:1754–1764. pmid:22157327
- 46. Li CZ, Hu JJ, Xue JY, Yin W, Liu YY, Fan WH, et al. (2014) Viral infection parameters not nucleoside analogue itself correlates with host immunity in nucleoside analogue therapy for chronic hepatitis B. World J Gastroenterol 20: 9486–9496. pmid:25071343
- 47. Wang GQ, Ding YP, Dong YH(2013) Telbivudine treatment is associated with high hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion and immune modulatory effects in chronic hepatitis B patients. J Viral Hepat 20:9–17. pmid:23458520
- 48. Liu H, Wang X, Wan G, Yang Z, Zeng H (2014) Telbivudine versus entecavir for nucleos(t)ide-naive HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis. Am J Med Sci 347:131–138. pmid:23563307
- 49. Mealing S, Ghement I, Hawkins N, Scott DA, Lescrauwaet B, Watt M, et al. (2014) The importance of baseline viral load when assessing relative efficacy in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev 3:21. pmid:24602249
- 50. Yuen MF, Yuan HJ, Hui CK, Wong DK, Wong WM, Chan AO, et al. (2003) A large population study of spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion and acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B infection: implications for antiviral therapy. Gut 52: 416–419. pmid:12584226
- 51. Boni C, Laccabue D, Lampertico P, Giuberti T, Viganò M, Schivazappa S, et al. (2012) Restored function of HBV-specific T cells after long-term effective therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gastroenterology 143: 963–973. pmid:22796241
- 52.
Wu YK, Lin GL, Li XY, Chen SR, Yang FJ, Ao YL, et al. (2014) 6 years retrospective and prospective real world research on efficacy and safety of initial treatment with nucleos (t) ide analogues in patients with chronic HBV infection. The Thirteenth National infectious disease academic conference proceedings. Guangzhou, China.
- 53. Tsai MC, Chen CH,Tseng PL, Hung CH, Chiu KW, Wang JH, et al. (2016) Comparison of renal safety and efficacy of telbivudine, entecavir and tenofovir treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: real world experience. Clin Microbiol Infect 22: 95.e1–7.
- 54. Kranidioti H, Manolakopoulos S, Khakoo SI (2015) Outcome after discontinuation of nucleot(s)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B: relapse rate and associated factors. Ann Gastroenterol 28:173–181. pmid:25831071
- 55. van Nunen AB, Hansen BE, Suh DJ, Löhr HF, Chemello L, Fontaine H, et al. (2003) Durability of HBeAg seroconversion following antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B: relation to type of therapy and pretreatment serum hepatitis B virus DNA and alanine aminotransferase. Gut 52: 420–424. pmid:12584227
- 56. Reijnders JG, Perquin MJ, Zhang N, Hansen BE, Janssen HL(2010) Nucleos(t)ide analogues only induce temporary hepatitis Be antigen seroconversion in most patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 139:491–498. pmid:20381492
- 57. Ferrari C(2015) HBV and the immune response. Liver Int 35:121–128. pmid:25529097
- 58. Boni C, Penna A, Bertoletti A, Lamonaca V, Rapti I, Missale G, et al. (2003) Transient restoration of anti-viral T cell responses induced by lamivudine therapy in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 39:595–605. pmid:12971971
- 59. Evans AA, Fine M, London WT (1997) Spontaneous seroconversion in hepatitis B e Antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B: implications for interferon therapy. The Journal of Infectious Disease 176: 845–850.