Rice OsMYB5P improves plant phosphate acquisition by regulation of phosphate transporter

Won Tae Yang; Dongwon Baek; Dae-Jin Yun; Kwang Sik Lee; So Yeon Hong; Ki Deuk Bae; Young Soo Chung; Yong Sham Kwon; Du Hyun Kim; Ki Hong Jung; Doh Hoon Kim

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194628

Abstract

Myeloblastosis (MYB) transcription factors play central roles in plant developmental processes and in responses to nutrient deficiency. In this study, OsMYB5P, an R2R3-MYB transcription factor, was isolated and identified from rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Dongjin’) under inorganic phosphate (Pi)-deficient conditions. OsMYB5P protein is localized to the nucleus and functions as a transcription activator in plant development. Overexpression of OsMYB5P in rice and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0) increases tolerance to phosphate starvation, whereas OsMYB5P knock-out through RNA interference increases sensitivity to Pi depletion in rice. Furthermore, shoots and roots of transgenic rice plants overexpressing OsMYB5P were longer than those of wild plants under both normal and Pi-deficient conditions. These results indicate that OsMYB5P is associated with the regulation of shoot development and root- system architecture. Overexpression of OsMYB5P led to increased Pi accumulation in shoots and roots. Interestingly, OsMYB5P directly bound to MBS (MYB binding site) motifs on the OsPT5 promoter and induced transcription of OsPT5 in rice. In addition, overexpression of OsMYB5P in Arabidopsis triggered increased expression of AtPht1;3, an Arabidopsis Pi transporter, in shoots and roots under normal and Pi-deficient conditions. Together, these results demonstrate that overexpression of OsMYB5P increases tolerance to Pi deficiency in plants by modulating Pi transporters at the transcriptional level in monocots and dicots.

Citation: Yang WT, Baek D, Yun D-J, Lee KS, Hong SY, Bae KD, et al. (2018) Rice OsMYB5P improves plant phosphate acquisition by regulation of phosphate transporter. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0194628. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628

Editor: Keqiang Wu, National Taiwan University, TAIWAN

Received: November 23, 2017; Accepted: March 6, 2018; Published: March 22, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This study was supported by the Dong-A University research fund(no grant numbers) and the URLs http://www.donga.ac.kr. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) in plants is an important nutrient for growth and productivity [1, 2]. Pi influences the regulation of biological (e.g., energy metabolism, signal transduction, and enzyme regulation) and physiological processes (e.g., anthocyanin accumulation, and release of organic acids into the rhizosphere) in plants [2–6]. To maintain cellular Pi homeostasis under Pi-deficient conditions, plants modify their root-system architecture (RSA) by developing more lateral roots and root hairs [7–9]. These responses are achieved primarily by coordination of Pi acquisition from the soil, Pi translocation from roots to shoots, and internal Pi remobilization [10].

Pi uptake is mediated by plasma-membrane-localized Pi transporters (PTs), which are encoded by nine isolated genes (PHT1;1-PHT1;9) in Arabidopsis and 13 genes (OsPT1-OsPT13) in rice (Oryza sativa) [4, 11, 12]. These PTs, encoded by PHT1 family members, are temporally and spatially upregulated in response to Pi starvation [13–15]. In Arabidopsis, the functions of most PTs under Pi starvation responses have been well elucidated, and the function of nine OsPTs in rice have also been characterized [11, 16–18]. Among these OsPTs, OsPT1 is highly expressed in roots and is a major regulator of Pi acquisition to maintain Pi homeostasis [19]. OsPT6, OsPT9, and OsPT10 are highly expressed in roots during low Pi stress and are associated with Pi uptake and translocation [20, 21]. OsPT2, a low-affinity transporter, plays an important role in Pi translocation from the root to the shoot, whereas OsPT8, a high-affinity transporter, plays a role in Pi uptake capacity in Pi homeostasis responses [22, 23]. OsPT4 transcripts are expressed constitutively in shoots and roots under Pi-deficient conditions [24]. In addition, OsPT11 and OsPT13, exclusively expressed in roots, are involved in fungal (such as arbuscular mycorrhizal) symbioses and symbiotic Pi uptake [16, 25]. Therefore, in response to plant Pi starvation, PT activity is increased accordingly in plant tissues [4, 12].

Although many studies have reported Pi-related transcription factors, the functions of several transcription factors that are directly regulated phosphate transporters in Pi starvation still have not been characterized in rice. For example, transcription factors such as PHR1 [26], PHL1/2/3 [27, 28], WRKY75 [29], WRKY45 [30], WRKY42 [31], and OsPHR1/2/3 [32, 33] have been reported to regulate Arabidopsis or rice PHT1;1 expression under Pi-deficient or Pi-sufficient conditions. In particular, Arabidopsis PHR1 binds to the P1BS (PHR1-binding sequence) motif as a dimer to a palindromic sequence (GNATATNC). AtPHR1 orthologs, such as OsPHR2 (Oryza sativa) [32], PvPHR1 (Phaseolus vulgaris) [34], BnPHR1 (Brassica napus) [35] and TaPHR1 (Triticum aestivum) [36], have been reported as having similar functions in Pi signaling and homeostasis.

Despite the research that has been done in this area, the molecular mechanism whereby R2R3-type MYB transcription factors directly regulate expression of PTs in rice is not as well known, except for OsMYB2P-1 and OsMYB4P [37, 38]. In this study, we investigated the roles of rice MYB5P in modulating Pi homeostasis through regulating PTs expression in rice and Arabidopsis. In particular, we found that OsMYB5P modulates Pi uptake by directly regulating OsPT5 expression under Pi-deficient and Pi-sufficient conditions in rice. OsMYB5P was found to be localized to the nucleus and to function as a transcriptional activator. Moreover, Pi acquisition was significantly increased by overexpression of OsMYB5P in rice and Arabidopsis. We demonstrated, by using a combination of physiological and biological approaches, that OsMYB5P, which functions as a transcriptional activator essential for PTs expression, plays an important role in maintaining Pi homeostasis in plants. Understanding the mechanism undergirding the maintenance of Pi homeostasis by OsMYB5P in monocots and dicots will help to develop new cultivars with high Pi efficiency.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

Oryza sativa L. ‘Dongjin’ and Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants were used in all physiological experiments and were also used to generate transgenic plants. We performed hydroponic and suspension cell-culture experiments as described in detail previously [38]. Rice or Arabidopsis plants were cultivated in growth chambers at 32 °C or 22 °C.

In silico analysis

To conduct an in silico analysis of OsMYB5P (Os02g0624300), sequences were analyzed by the BLAST sequence and multiple sequence alignment (MSA) programs from NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), Gramene (http://www.gramene.org), and CLUSTAL W (http://www.genome.jp/tools/clustalw).

Plasmid construction

To construct OsMYB5P-OX and OsMYB5P-RNAi transgenic rice plants, we inserted the full length (774 bp) and a partial fragment (210 bp) of the OsMYB5P gene into pENTR^™/D-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All gene-specific primer sequences are listed in S3 Table. The recombination reaction between the entry and destination vectors was carried out using LR Clonase^™ II enzyme mix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The destination vectors used were pH7WG2D.1 and pB7GWIWG2(II),0.

Generation of OsMYB5P transgenic plants

The OsMYB5P:pH7WG2D.1 (OsMYB5P-OX) and OsMYB5P:pB7GWIWG2(II),0 (OsMYB5P-RNAi) constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens (EHA105) by electroporation. We used a modified version of a general rice-transformation protocol [39, 40]. Rice seeds were placed on N6D callus induction medium. Callus growth was induced by culturing at 30 °C in the dark for 4 weeks. Actively growing embryogenic calli were used in this experiment. Calli induced on N6D media were transferred to fresh media and preconditioned for 3 d at 28 °C in the dark. Preconditioned calli as described above were immersed in A. tumefaciens suspension for 10 min and transferred to 2N6-AS medium. To improve co-cultivation efficiency, 100 μM of acetosyringone was added to the bacterial suspension after 1 d of culture. After the co-cultivation, calli were rinsed two times with distilled water, three times with distilled water containing 200 mg/L cefotaxime, and placed on the first selection media. Calli were cultured at 26 °C for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, rapidly growing calli that had proliferated on the selection media were transferred to regeneration media biweekly until roots and shoots emerged. Then, transgenic OsMYB5P-OX (T0) plants were transferred to soil and were grown in growth chambers at 32 °C.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens (GV3101)-mediated Arabidopsis transformation was performed using vacuum infiltration [41]. Transgenic OsMYB5P-OX (T1) plants were selected on Murashige and Skoog media containing the appropriate antibiotics (Kanamycin) and then transferred to soil and allowed to self-pollinate.

Transient analysis in Arabidopsis protoplasts

To investigate the subcellular localization and transcriptional activity of OsMYB5P, we introduced plasmid constructs into Arabidopsis protoplasts prepared from leaf tissues by PEG-mediated transformation, as described in detail previously [38, 42].

Gene expression analysis

As previously reported, total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for northern blot and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis [38]. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized using 3 μg of total RNA with a cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), to serve as the templates for qRT-PCR. To measure levels of gene expression, qRT-PCR was performed, and values were automatically calculated using a CFX384 Real-time PCR Detection System and CFX Manager software (Bio-Rad. Hercules, CA, USA) following a standard protocol. The sequences of primers used in qRT-PCR analysis are provided in S3 Table.

Measurements of total Pi content in plants

Samples were frozen after fresh weight measurement, or dried at 80 °C for 3 d to measure dry weight. Inorganic Pi measurement followed a previously described method [38].

Protein expression and purification

We inserted the full-length OSMYB5P cDNA from rice into the pGEX-2T vector (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) using XhoI restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends of the cDNA fragment (S3 Table). The pGEX-2T:OsMYB5P clone was introduced into the BL21 DE3 strain (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) of E. coli. Expression of OSMYB5P protein was induced by applying 0.5 mM IPTG for 3 h at 30 °C. The recombinant OSMYB5P-GST protein extracts were purified by affinity chromatography using glutathione-agarose resin (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Preparation of OsMYB5P antibody

Purified recombinant OsMYB5P (10 μg) was mixed with an equal volume of Freund’s complete adjuvant (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), for a total volume of 200 μL, and injected into BALB/c mice (Semtaco Bio Korea Co., South Korea). After the first injection, three successive injections were given at one-week intervals with antigens mixed with equal volumes of Freund’s incomplete adjuvant (a total of 200 μL, Sigma). Blood was collected 3 d after the last injection and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 5 min.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

We performed ChIP assays as described by [43]. Nuclei were isolated from 10-day-old plants (100 mg) using CelLytic^™ PN (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Chromatin was extracted from nuclei by sonication 10× for 30 s at low power using a BIORUPTOR (BMS, Tokyo, Japan). Anti-OsMYB5P was used for immunoprecipitation. The amount of immunoprecipitated DNA was quantified by qRT-PCR. The primers used in the ChIP assay are listed in S3 Table.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

To generate the biotin-labeled DNA probes, oligonucleotides spanning the MYB-binding sites (MBS) on the PTs promoter were used with 3′ overhang biotin-labeled oligonucleotides (OsPT5-MBS1-F, 5′-TATAATATAATGAACTTACAGTTGAGACATACATATGAA-3′; OsPT5-MBS1-R, 5′-TTCATATGTATGTCTCAACTGTAAGTTCATTATATTATA-3′; OsPT5-MBS2-F, 5′-GGACAGGAACATTCCAGTTGATGGTTTCCTTCAATTAGG-3′; OsPT5-MBS2-R, 5′-CCTAATTGAAGGAAACCATCAACTGGAATGTTCCTGTCC-3′; COSMO Genetech, Seoul, Korea). Biotin-labeled DNA was detected using a LightShift Chemiluminescence EMSA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA binding reaction was allowed to proceed at 25 °C for 20 min in binding buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 500 mM KCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol), 5 mM MgCl₂, 2.5% glycerol, 0.05% NP-40, and 50 ng/μL of poly (dI-dC), and with various concentrations of purified bacterial expressed OsMYB5P protein. The reaction was initiated by adding a 3′-biotin-labeled DNA probe and allowed to proceed at 25 °C for 30 min. The reaction mixture was then subjected to electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer at 100 V for 3 h. The gel was then transferred to a Hybrid-N⁺ membrane (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), and cross-linked using a commercial UV-light crosslinking instrument (Stratagene/HiTechTrader, NJ, USA). The signal was automatically developed and exposed using a ChemiDoc^™ image system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Results

Characterization of OsMYB5P in rice

It has recently been reported that MYB transcription factors in rice are key regulators for phosphate acquisition in phosphate starvation signaling [37, 38]. To investigate how rice MYB transcription factors respond to phosphate starvation, we isolated and identified an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, OsMYB5P (Os02g0624300), from rice. OsMYB5P encodes an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor that is encoded by nucleotide 774 bp and includes 258 amino acids with a total molecular mass of approximately 28.49 kDa (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/). To find out whether the transcription level of OsMYB5P is specifically regulated by nutrient-limited conditions, we transferred cell suspensions from rice to different nutrient-deficient media for 6 h. Northern blot analysis showed that the expression of OsMYB5P was highly induced by Pi-deficiency stress (Fig 1A). In contrast, OsMYB5P was either weakly expressed or not expressed at all in response to deprivation of other nutrients (N, K, and Fe).

Download:

Fig 1. Functional characterization of OsMYB5P.

(A) Expression of an OsMYB5P transcript in rice suspension cells under nutrient-deficient conditions. Rice suspension cells were transferred to nitrogen (N; 0.25 mM), phosphate (Pi; 0.0125 mM), potassium (K; 0.01 mM), or iron (Fe; 0.01 mM)-deficient media for 6 h. Total RNA was extracted from these nutrient-deprived cells. rRNA is a loading control. (B) Subcellular localization of OsMYB5P using Arabidopsis protoplast systems. Arabidopsis protoplasts were transiently co-transformed with a CaMV35S:OsMYB5P-sGFP or CaMV35S:sGFP vector and NLS-RFP constructs. NLS-RFP was used as a nuclear marker protein. After 24 h, GFP and RFP signals of transformed protoplasts were monitored using a fluorescence microscope. Scale bar indicates 20 μm. (C) Transcriptional activity assay of OsMYB5P. A schematic representation (top) shows the effector and reporter constructs used in the transient expression assay. Arabidopsis protoplasts were co-transfected using combinations with each effector along with two reporter constructs. ARF5/MP was used as a positive control, and 35S:LUC was used as an internal control. After normalization to LUC activity, GUS activity in each sample was measured. Bars represent the mean ± standard deviation of three technical replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g001

To find out whether OsMYB5P is localized in the nucleus like other transcription factors, we fused the full-length cDNA of OsMYB5P to the N-terminus of sGFP protein under the control of a 35S promoter. The fluorescence signal of the OsMYB5P-sGFP was detected primarily in the cell nucleus, whereas that of the sGFP vector alone was distributed throughout the cytoplasm (Fig 1B). For the nuclear marker, we used a chimeric construct containing nuclear localization signal (NLS) proteins fused to red fluorescent protein (RFP). To analyze the transcriptional activation ability of OsMYB5P, we performed a transient expression assay in Arabidopsis protoplasts. OsMYB5P fused to the yeast GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD) effector and a constitutively expressed reporter gene, including four upstream GAL4 DNA binding sites (GAL4[4X]-D1-D3[4X]-GUS), was co-transfected into Arabidopsis protoplasts (Fig 1C). We used the empty vector (Vector) or DBD:ARF5/MP (ARF5/MP) as negative or positive control [38, 44]. As expected, OsMYB5P strongly increased GUS activity, much more than the vector alone. These results indicated that transcription of OsMYB5P is highly induced under Pi-deficient conditions, and OsMYB5P can function as a transcriptional activator in the nucleus.

OsMYB5P modulates plant development and Pi uptake in rice

To functionally characterize OsMYB5P in response and adaptation to Pi deprivation, we generated two transgenic plants with contrasting expression patterns in rice: OsMYB5P overexpression (OsMYB5P-OX) and RNA interference (OsMYB5P-RNAi) lines (S1A and S2A Figs). We detected transcription of OsMYB5P in OsMYB5P-OX and OsMYB5P-RNAi transgenic plants under a high concentration of Pi (High Pi, 1.25 mM) or a low concentration of Pi (Pi deficiency, 0.0125 mM) by qRT-PCR (S3 Fig). When 7-d-old OsMYB5P-OX, OsMYB5P-RNAi, and WT plants were exposed to culture media containing either high Pi or low Pi for 7 d, both the shoots and the roots of OsMYB5P-OX plants accumulated higher biomass than did the shoots and roots of WT plants, but those of OsMYB5P-RNAi plants did not (Fig 2A) (S1, S2 and S4 Figs). In addition, the shoots and primary roots of OsMYB5P-OX plants grew better under high-Pi and Pi-deficient conditions than did shoots and primary roots of WT plants (Fig 2B and 2C). When these transgenic plants were grown for 3 weeks, plant growth was similar to that of growth for only 7 d between transgenic plants and WT (S6 Fig). Lateral root density and growth of lateral roots were significantly higher in OsMYB5P-OX plants than in WT plants grown in either high-Pi or Pi-deficient conditions (Fig 2D–2F).

Download:

Fig 2. Physiological characterization of OsMYB5P responses to Pi deficiency.

(A) Seven-day-old WT, OsMYB5P-OX, and OsMYB5P-RNAi seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi-deficient (0.0125 mM KH₂PO₄) media. Scale bar indicates 5 cm. (B and C) Graphical representation of the shoot (B) and primary root (C) length of seedlings depicted in (A). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (D) Lateral root development at the tip of the primary root of plants depicted in (A). Scale bar indicates 1 cm. (E and F) Graphical representation of the lateral root densities (E) or total lateral root lengths (F) of primary root of plants shown in (A). Measurement of density or average is the number or length of lateral roots along 5 cm of root above the root tip. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (G) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of plants under both high Pi and Pi-deficient conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value ˂ 0.01; Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g002

To understand the function of OsMYB5P in Pi uptake, we measured the Pi concentration of OsMYB5P-OX, OsMYB5P-RNAi, and WT plants under high-Pi or Pi-deficient conditions (Fig 2G) (S1E, S2E and S6D Figs). The Pi concentration in shoots and roots of OsMYB5P-OX plants was higher than that of WT plants grown under high Pi or under Pi deficiency. In contrast, the Pi in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants was maintained at a relatively lower level than in WT plants. Taken together, these results suggest that OsMYB5P may play a regulatory role in Pi uptake and adaptation to Pi-deficiency stress.

OsMYB5P is associated with OsPT5 gene expression through MBS motifs

Pi-responsive transporters increase plant growth and development by helping to maintain Pi homeostasis. In particular, most PTs induce transcriptional expression of many Pi starvation-inducible (PSI) genes by Pi starvation [26, 27]. To investigate how the transcription factor OsMYB5P is involved in OsPTs gene expression, we performed an in silico analysis of the presumptive promoter region using the PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/). Several OsPTs promoters include putative cis-acting regulatory elements of the MYB binding site (MBS), which is typically associated with abiotic stress responses (S1 Table). To identify MBSs associated with OsPTs based on the in silico analysis, we performed a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay using nucleus protein extracts of WT and OsMYB5P-OX transgenic plants. After immunoprecipitation with an antiserum against OsMYB5P (Fig 3A and 3B) (S7B Fig), the relative content of MBS fragments in the OsPTs promoter was estimated by qRT-PCR. Interestingly, the amplicons OsPT5-MBS1 and OsPT5-MBS2 in the MBS region of OsMYB5P-OX plants were significantly more enriched than those in the WT (Fig 3A). Moreover, enrichment of the amplicons OsPT5-MBS1 in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants was significantly reduced more than that of the WT (Fig 3B). No enrichment of other MBS regions in other OsPTs promoters was observed in the OsMYB5P-OX extracts, except for OsPT5 (Fig 3A). To test whether OsMYB5P plays a role in OsPT5-mediated Pi-starvation signaling, we compared the expression of OsPT5 mRNA transcripts in WT, OsMYB5P-OX, and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants in high-Pi and Pi-deficient conditions by qRT-PCR. Significant increases in steady-state levels of OsPT5 transcripts were observed in shoots and roots of OsMYB5P-OX plants (Fig 3C). However, the OsPT5 transcript was more weakly expressed in OsMYB5P-RNAi than in the WT. These results suggest that OsMYB5P is involved in OsPT5-mediated Pi-deficiency signaling and Pi uptake in rice.

Download:

Fig 3. OsMYB5P associated with OsPT5.

(A) ChIP assay of OsMYB5P binding to the OsPTs promoter. Seven-day-old WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi or Pi deficient media. Then, the shoots and roots were harvested separately for the ChIP assay with anti-OsMYB5P. Fold enrichment of the ratio of OsMYB5P-OX to WT signal is shown here. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. (B) OsMYB5P associated with OsPT5 in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants. ChIP assay was used to detect the association between OsMYB5P and the OsPT5 promoter. Seven-day-old WT and OsMYB5P-RNAi seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi or Pi deficient media. Then, the shoots and roots were harvested separately for the ChIP assay with anti-OsMYB5P. Fold enrichment of the ratio of OsMYB5P-RNAi to WT signal is shown here. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. (C) qRT-PCR analysis of the relative expression levels of the OsPT5 gene in shoots and roots of seedlings grown under high Pi or Pi-deficient conditions. Expression levels of OsACTIN1 were used for normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; Student’s t-test). (D) EMSA was used to analyze the binding of OsMYB5P to MBS fragments (MBS1 and MBS2) of the OsPT5 promoter. The DNA probes containing the MBS motif were amplified using biotin-labeled (left) or cold-probe (right; competitor). The labeled DNA-OsMYB5P complex is indicated by an arrow head.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g003

To examine whether OsMYB5P protein binds to one or both of these MBSs in the OsPT5 promoter, we performed an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) with biotin-labeled oligonucleotides corresponding to promoter fragments containing MBS motifs (OsPT5-MBS1 and OsPT5-MBS2) and recombinant OsMYB5P-GST or GST proteins (S7A Fig). A GST-OsMYB5P-specific mobility-retarded band indicating binding to OsMYB5P was observed with the OsPT5-MBS1 oligonucleotide (Fig 3D, left). The intensity of this band was enhanced by increasing the amount of GST-OsMYB5P protein in the binding reaction. OsMYB5P mobility-retarded bands were observed with the OsPT5-MBS2 oligonucleotide, indicating weak binding (Fig 3D, left). Moreover, OsMYB5P/OsPT5-MBS1 mobility-retarded bands were observed with competitor oligonucleotides, indicating decreased binding (Fig 3D, right). Together, the results from the EMSA and ChIP assays indicate that OsMYB5P directly binds to MBS regions in the OsPT5 promoter in vitro and in vivo.

Absence of OsPT5 affects Pi-starvation responses in rice

Although functions of some OsPTs were reported in Pi-starvation responses [20, 23, 37], the function of OsPT5 was still unknown. To prove the above hypothesis, we acquired an ospt5 mutant that contains a T-DNA insertion in the first exon of OsPT5 (S5 Fig; Dr. Jung kindly provided the rice ospt5 mutant plants). Like the phenotype of OsMYB5P-RNAi plants, growth of the shoot and primary root in the ospt5 mutant was more inhibited than in WT plants in high-Pi and Pi-deficient media (Fig 4A–4C). Moreover, the fresh weights of ospt5 and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants were comparable (Fig 4D). Furthermore, there was no difference in the Pi content of roots and shoots of ospt5 and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants grown in high-Pi and Pi-deficient media (Fig 4E). As the absence of OsPT5 produced the expected phenotypes, we conclude that OsMYB5P and OsPT5 play an important role for maintaining Pi homeostasis in Pi starvation signaling.

Download:

Fig 4. Physiological characterization of ospt5 mutant under Pi deficiency.

(A) Seven-day-old WT, ospt5, OsMYB5P-OX, and OsMYB5P-RNAi seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi-deficient (0.0125 mM KH₂PO₄) media. Scale bar indicates 5 cm. (B and C) Graphical representation of the shoot (B) and primary root (C) length of seedlings depicted in (A). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (D) Fresh shoot and root biomass of ospt5 mutant plants. Seven-day-old seedlings were grown for 7 d in high Pi or Pi-deficient media, after which shoots and roots were sampled separately. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (E) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of plants under both high Pi and Pi-deficient conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g004

OsMYB5P affects expression of rice PSI genes

In silico analysis showed that promoter regions of most OsPTs, except OsPT1, OsPT2 and OsPT10, included several putative MBS cis-acting elements (S1 Table). We showed evidence that transcript of OsPT5 was significantly increased by overexpressing of OsMYB5P (Fig 3C). However, although some OsPTs, OsPT3 and OsPT9, were highly expressed in OsMYB5P-OX plants (Fig 5A), one cannot conclude that transcript of these genes was directly regulated by OsMYB5P. Transcriptional expression of many PSR genes in downstream of signaling pathway affects plant developmental and physiological responses during Pi starvation [27, 45]. Our data show that overexpression of OsMYB5P induces plant growth under both normal Pi and Pi-deficient conditions (Fig 2). To validate whether OsMYB5P changes the expression of rice PSI genes, we investigated the transcript levels of several genes, including OsPAP10, OsSQD, OsIPS, and OsmiR399j, in the shoots and roots of WT, OsMYB5P-OX, and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants (Fig 5B). Compared to the WT, transcript levels of most PSI genes were high in the shoots and roots of OsMYB5P-OX plants under Pi-deficient conditions. In contrast, transcripts of most PSI genes were downregulated in both shoots and roots of OsMYB5P-RNAi plants more than in the WT under Pi-deficient conditions. These data suggest that OsMYB5P regulates transcript levels of PSI genes to maintain Pi homeostasis in rice under Pi deprivation. Interestingly, however, expression of these genes in OsMYB5P-OX and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants showed no change under high-Pi conditions (Fig 5B). These results supported the evidence that Pi accumulation by OsMYB5P promoted plant growth during high-Pi conditions (Fig 2), unrelated expression of PSI genes.

Download:

Fig 5. Expression of PSI genes in WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

(A) Expression of OsPTs genes in the WT and OsMYB5P-OX transgenic plants. Total RNA was extracted from WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings grown under high Pi (HP) or Pi deficient (LP) conditions. (B) Expression of OsPAP10, OsSQD, OsIPS, and OsmiR399j genes in the WT and OsMYB5P-OX transgenic plants. Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of seedlings grown under high Pi or Pi-deficient conditions. Expression of OsACTIN1 was used for normalization. Error bars represent mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g005

Overexpression of OsMYB5P increases Pi accumulation and Pi-starvation responses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants

To understand the possible roles of OsMYB5P in plant Pi-starvation responses, OsMYB5P was overexpressed in Arabidopsis WT plants under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter (S8A Fig). To test for OsMYB5P expression, we used northern blot analysis in transgenic Arabidopsis plants to generate T3 homozygous lines for further analysis (S8B Fig). To investigate whether overexpression of OsMYB5P correlated with the Pi-starvation response in both monocots and dicots, we examined the phenotype of OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants under Pi-deficient conditions, as with the rice OsMYB5P-OX plants (Fig 2). Under high-Pi conditions, no obvious difference in the phenotype between Arabidopsis WT and transgenic Arabidopsis plants was observed (Fig 6). After Pi deprivation, the primary roots of OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants grew slightly larger than those of Arabidopsis WT plants (Fig 6A and 6B). However, there were more lateral roots and denser root hairs in OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants than in Arabidopsis WT plants, with the exception of lateral root length (Fig 6C and 6D) (S9 Fig). In addition, Pi accumulated more in both shoots and roots of OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants than in those of WT Arabidopsis plants (Fig 6E). These results indicate that overexpression of OsMYB5P increases tolerance to Pi deprivation and promotes Pi accumulation during Pi-deficient conditions in Arabidopsis.

Download:

Fig 6. Phenotypic alteration in root architecture of Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

(A) Four-day-old Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi-deficient (0 mM KH₂PO₄) media. (B) Quantification of primary root lengths of the seedlings depicted in (A). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 18 seedlings for each experiment. (C) Comparison of root architectures of Arabidopsis between WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings depicted in (A). Scale bar indicates 1 mm. (D) Quantification of root hair densities at the primary root tip of plants shown in (C). Root hair density was calculated as the number of root hairs along 5 mm of each root above the tip. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 18 seedlings for each experiment. (E) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of Arabidopsis seedlings. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 18 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; Student’s t-test). F.W. indicates fresh weight.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g006

OsMYB5P regulates expression of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters

In Arabidopsis, the Pht1 family contains nine members, AtPht1;1 to AtPht1;9, which play major roles in the regulation of phosphate uptake in Pi acquisition and translocation [13]. Four additional major phosphate transporters involved in the Arabidopsis Pi-starvation response are also known from other families: AtPht2;1, AtPht3;1, AtPht3;2, and AtPht3;3 [46, 47]. Previous experimental data demonstrate that OsMYB5P directly regulates phosphate transporters through binding at the promoter in rice (Fig 3). To investigate whether OsMYB5P regulates Arabidopsis phosphate transporters, we performed qRT-PCR analysis in shoots and roots under Pi-deficient conditions. Among the Arabidopsis phosphate transporters, transcripts of AtPht1:3 were more highly induced in both shoots and roots of OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants under both high-Pi and Pi-deficient conditions than in Arabidopsis WT plants (Fig 7A). The AtPht1;3 promoter contains one MBS cis-element as identified by in silico analysis (S2 Table). However, expression levels of other phosphate transporters in both shoots and roots of OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants were similar to those of Arabidopsis WT plants under high-Pi and Pi-deficient conditions (S10 Fig). Although several other factors regulate phosphate transporters during Pi-starvation responses, these data indicate that transcripts of AtPht1:3 are highly expressed in OsMYB5P transgenic Arabidopsis plants, providing a molecular basis upon which OsMYB5P might modulate the expression of phosphate uptake signaling at the transcriptional level.

Download:

Fig 7. Expression of Arabidopsis PTs in Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

(A) Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings grown under high Pi or Pi-deficient conditions. Expression levels of AtTUBULIN2 were used for normalization. Bars represent the mean ± standard error of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*, 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05; **, p-value < 0.01; Student’s t-test). (B) Working model of the role of OsMYB5P in various Pi starvation responses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.g007

Discussion

The Pi-starvation response in plants is induced by various phenomena, including physiological and morphological processes, and involves the transcriptional expression of numerous genes [48]. Although many studies of the transcription factors involved in this response have been conducted, current knowledge of the function of MYB transcription factors is limited. In this study, we isolated and identified OsMYB5P, a rice gene encoding a novel R2R3-type MYB transcription factor, and characterized its role in the Pi-starvation response by overexpression and RNAi knock-down with OsMYB5P in monocots and dicots. We demonstrated that OsMYB5P plays a regulatory role in the transcriptional expression of a Pi transporter and contributes to Pi acquisition to maintain Pi homeostasis in rice and Arabidopsis.

Various specific and general MYB transcription factors have been shown to regulate the progression of Pi-starvation responses in monocots and dicots [48–50]. The major transcription factors are activated by the signals of Pi starvation when plants are exposed to Pi-deficiency stress and respond by various mechanisms, such as activated Pi uptake, Pi allocation, and Pi remobilization (Fig 7B). PHR1, a well-known transcription factor in the CC-type MYB family, is an important regulator in the Pi-starvation response that controls Pi homeostasis by enhancing PHO2 cleavage by miR399 [51]. OsPHR2 directly regulates OsPT2 transcriptional expression under Pi-deficient conditions [52]. Meanwhile, other MYB transcription factors, such as OsMYB2P-1 and OsMYB4P, showed no evidence directly regulation of PSI genes. However, they suggested indirectly evidence that changed the transcript levels of PSI genes to accumulate Pi (Fig 7B) [37, 38]. In our study, we suggest that OsMYB5P, a member of the R2R3-type MYB family in rice, directly and specifically induces the transcription of Pi transporters, especially OsPT5 and AtPht1;3, in both shoots and roots (Fig 7B).

Specific function of OsMYB5P in Pi homeostasis in rice

The MYB transcription factors, particularly the R2R3-type, act as important regulators in developmental growth, signaling transduction, abiotic stress, and nutrient-deficiency tolerance [53–55]. The R2R3-MYB transcription factors include 88 proteins, and they localize to the nucleus in rice [55]. The roles of R2R3-MYB transcription factors in the maintenance of Pi homeostasis in rice are poorly understood. At present, we know that two R2R3-MYB transcription factors (of 88 in the rice R2R3-MYB family) play a key regulatory role in the Pi-starvation response [37, 38]. We established that OsMYB5P, like OsMYB2P-1 and OsMYB4P, consists of R2R3-MYB domains at the N-terminus and localizes to the nucleus (Fig 1B) (S11 Fig). It has been reported that expression of OsMYB2P-1 and OsMYB4P is induced in shoots and roots when they are deprived of Pi and other nutrients [37, 38]. We demonstrated that OsMYB5P is also highly expressed in shoots and roots during Pi deprivation (Fig 1A). In addition to the R2R3-MYB family, OsPHR1 and OsPHR2, genes that encode transcription factors in the MYB-CC family, are involved in Pi- and Fe-starvation responses in rice [26, 32]. Thus, to our knowledge, the evidence presented herein is the first report to show that OsMYB5P is related to the regulation of a strictly Pi-starvation response regardless of other nutrient levels in rice.

Overexpression of OsMYB5P confers tolerance to Pi deprivation in plants

Many transcription factors in rice have been shown to be involved in signal transduction and regulation through control of gene expression induced by the Pi-starvation response [48, 56]. Some responses function like other regulatory mechanisms in rice. For example, overexpression of OsPHR1, OsPHR2, and OsMYB2P-1 genes retards plant growth by Pi accumulation under normal conditions [27, 32, 37]. However, OsMYB2P-1 overexpression increases shoot and root growth under Pi-deficient conditions [37], and overexpression of OsMYB4P promotes plant growth in both normal and Pi-deficient conditions [38]. In our experiments, shoots and roots in OsMYB5P overexpressing transgenic plants were found to grow better than the WT under normal conditions, whereas OsMYB5P RNAi plants showed decreased growth in shoots and roots (Fig 2). Interestingly, our data demonstrated that overexpression of OsMYB5P was not an effect of the most OsPTs genes expression, but highly induced the expression of OsPT5 in both shoots and roots during high-Pi conditions (Figs 3 and 5). Therefore, we suggested that promotion of plant growth by overexpressing of OsMYB5P was causative of OsPT5 level, which regulates the acquisition and transport Pi in plants.

Transgenic plants that overexpress OsMYB5P tolerated Pi deficiency better, as indicated by increased shoot and root biomass (Fig 2) (S4 and S6 Figs). Moreover, the increased tolerance of Pi-deficiency stress by OsMYB5P-overexpressing plants occurs simultaneously with increasing expression of PSI genes, including OsPAP10a, OsSQD, OsIPS, and OsmiR399j (Fig 5B). OsPAP10a and OsSQD encode an acid phosphatase and sulfolipid synthase, respectively, and are involved in the Pi-starvation response [32, 57]. OsmiR399 and OsIPS play a critical role in controlling plant Pi uptake [26, 58–60]. Activation of acid phosphatases and scavenging systems in Pi-starvation responses is a functional adaptation to make the best use of Pi availability for plants under Pi-deficient conditions [4, 61]. OsPHR2, a central regulator in Pi starvation response, overexpressing were not only up-regulated some PSI genes, but also increased Pi accumulation in both shoots and roots [32]. Like OsPHR2 overexpressing, OsMYB5P overexpressing plants was similar observed in our results. Thus, our evidences suggested that OsMYB5P was an important regulator in Pi uptake and Pi translocation, although transcript levels of OsPT5 and PSI genes by OsMYB5P were highly increased in roots compared to those in shoots during Pi deficiency (Figs 3C and 5B). In addition, the increased tolerance by OsMYB5P transgenic plants of Pi deficiency may be associated with altered expression patterns of PSI genes.

OsMYB5P is a positive regulator that maintains Pi homeostasis in plants

Pi transporters are directly responsible for Pi acquisition and transport in plants [13, 62]. OsPHR2 directly regulates OsPT2 transcription by binding to P1BS (PHR1 binding sequence; GNATATNC) on the promoter [63]. Although most PTs in rice contain the P1BS motif in the promoter, only OsPT2 is regulated by OsPHR2 in Pi-starvation responses [52]. We demonstrated the biological evidence to prove these hypotheses by ChIP assay (Fig 3A). Our study revealed that OsPT5 may, in part, account for the observed Pi uptake in shoots and roots of OsMYB5P-overexpressing transgenic plants under Pi-deficient conditions, as evidenced by the greater upregulation of this gene in such plants than in the WT (Fig 3C). Overexpression of OsMYB5P resulted in higher Pi content in transgenic rice plants than in WT plants under Pi-deficient conditions (Fig 2G). In addition, Pi content in ospt5 mutant plants was lower than in WT plants, as it also was in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants (Fig 4E). Therefore, OsMYB5P may regulate Pi acquisition by targeting OsPT5 at the transcriptional level. Furthermore, overexpression of OsMYB5P in Arabidopsis increases transcriptional levels of Pi transporters AtPht1:3 (Fig 7A). Finally, our results suggest that OsMYB5P is likely to play a role in the positive regulation of Pi-dependent transporters, which in turn may facilitate Pi acquisition under Pi-deficient conditions in both monocots and dicots.

Conclusions

In summary, this study characterized an OsMYB5P transcription factor belonging to the R2R3-type of the MYB family that is localized to the nucleus and acts as a transcriptional activator. OsMYB5P acts as an important regulator of Pi-starvation responses, such that overexpression of OsMYB5P results in a larger root-system architecture and more shoot development under normal and Pi-deficient conditions, increased tolerance to Pi-deficiency stress, and improved expression of PSI genes. In addition, our results demonstrate that OsMYB5P can function as a positive regulator of Pi transporters in monocots and dicots.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-OX plants under Pi deficiency.

(A) Transcriptional expression of OsMYB5P in different OsMYB5P-OX transgenic plants. Total RNA was extracted from WT and three independent OsMYB5P-OX seedlings grown under high Pi conditions. Expression of OsACTIN1 was used for normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ˂ 0.01, Student’s t-test). (B) Seven-day-old WT, and three independent OsMYB5P-OX seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi deficient (0.0125 mM KH₂PO₄) media. Scale bar indicates 5 cm. (C and D) Graphical representation of the shoot (C) or primary root (D) length of seedlings depicted in (B). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (E) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of plants under both high Pi and Pi deficient conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-RNAi plants to Pi deficiency.

(A) Transcriptional expression of OsMYB5P in different OsMYB5P-RNAi transgenic plants by northern blot analysis. Total RNA was extracted from WT and three independent OsMYB5P-RNAi seedlings grown under high Pi conditions. rRNA used a loading control. (B) Seven-day-old WT, and three independent OsMYB5P-RNAi seedlings were grown vertically for 7 d on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi deficient (0.0125 mM KH₂PO₄) media. Scale bar indicates 5 cm. (C and D) Graphical representation of the shoot (C) or primary root (D) length of seedlings depicted in (B). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (E) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of plants under both high Pi and Pi deficient conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Expression of OsMYB5P in WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of seedlings grown under high Pi or Pi deficient conditions. Expression of OsACTIN1 was used for normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Biomass analysis of OsMYB5P transgenic plants to Pi deficiency.

Seven-day-old seedlings were grown for 7 d in high Pi or Pi deficient media, after which shoots (A) and roots (B) were sampled separately. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (**; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Characterization of ospt5 mutant in rice.

(A) Schematic illustration is a representation of the location of T-DNA insertions in ospt5 mutant. (B) Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of ospt5 mutant grown under high Pi conditions. Expression of OsACTIN1 was used for normalization. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (**; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-OX, OsMYB5P-RNAi and ospt5 plants to Pi deficiency.

(A) Seven-day-old WT, OsMYB5P-OX, OsMYB5P-RNAi and ospt5 seedlings were grown vertically for 3 weeks on high Pi (1.25 mM KH₂PO₄) or Pi deficient (0.0125 mM KH₂PO₄) media. Scale bar indicates 5 cm. (B and C) Graphical representation of the shoot (B) or primary root (C) length of seedlings depicted in (A). Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 10 replicates of 3 seedlings for each experiment. (D) Inorganic Pi concentrations were measured in the shoots and roots of plants under both high Pi and Pi deficient conditions. Error bars represent mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates of 10 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. OsMYB5P associated with OsPT5 in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants.

(A) Induction of OsMYB5P protein from Escherichia coli using 0.5 mM IPTG at 30 °C for 3 h. The SDS-PAGE gel with GST and OsMYB5P-GST proteins was stained using Coomassie brilliant blue. M denotes a protein size marker. (B) Immunoprecipitation assay with mouse anti-OsMYB5P antibody. To detect the endogenous OsMYB5P in rice, total proteins were extracted from rice WT, OsMYB5P-OX, and OsMYB5P-RNAi plants, and then immunoprecipitated with mouse anti-OsMYB5P monoclonal antibody. The arrow and arrowhead indicate endogenous OsMYB5P protein (lower panel; approximately 28.49 kDa) and a non-specific band (upper panel), respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s007

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Expression of OsMYB5P in Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

(A) Schematic diagram of the OsMYB5P chimeric plasmid structure. The full-length cDNA of OsMYB5P is under the control of a 35S promoter, and linked to the hygromycine resistance gene (hpt) and the green fluorescent protein (Egfp). (B) Expression of OsMYB5P in Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants by northern blot analysis. Total RNA was extracted from 11 representative transgenic lines. rRNA is a loading control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s008

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Development of lateral roots in Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants during Pi deficiency.

Total lateral root number (A) or length (B) on primary root of plants shown in Fig 5C. Error bars represent the mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates with 18 seedlings for each experiment. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01< p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value ≤ 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s009

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Expression of Arabidopsis PT genes in the Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

Total RNA was extracted from shoots and roots of Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P-OX seedlings grown under high Pi or Pi deficient conditions. Expression levels of AtTUBULIN2 were used for normalization. Bars represent the mean ± standard error of three technical replicates. Asterisks represent significant differences from the WT (*; 0.01 < p-value ≤ 0.05, **; p-value < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s010

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Schematic structure of OsMYB5P.

The two types of MYB domain repeats on the N terminus of OsMYB5P are indicated with red (R2) and blue (R3). The alignment of the DNA-binding (R2 and R3) domains with the amino acid sequence of rice R2R3-MYB transcription factors involved in Pi starvation responses was performed using CLUSTAL W. Identical amino acids are shaded black, and similar amino acids are shaded in gray.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s011

(TIF)

S1 Table. Putative MBS cis-elements in the promoter of rice phosphate transporters (OsPTs).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s012

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Putative MBS cis-elements in the promoter of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters (AtPhts).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s013

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Primer lists for our studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194628.s014

(DOCX)

References

1. Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Bragg J, Finnegan PM, Lovelock CE, Plaxton WC, et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytol. 2012;195: 306–320. pmid:22691045
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Zhang Z, Liao H, Lucas WJ. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56: 192–220. pmid:24417933
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Holford ICR. Soil phosphorus: its measurement and its uptake by plants. Aust J Soil Res. 1997;35: 227–239.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Raghothama KG. Phosphate acquisition. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999;50: 665–693. pmid:15012223
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Yuan H, Liu D. Signaling components involved in plant responses to phosphate starvation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50: 849–859. pmid:18713395
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, et al. Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 2011;156: 997–1005. pmid:21571668
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Franco-Zorrilla JM, González E, Bustos R, Linhares F, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J. The transcriptional control of plant responses to phosphate limitation. J Exp Bot. 2004;55: 285–293. pmid:14718495
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Misson J, Raghothama KG, Jain A, Jouhet J, Block MA, Bligny R, et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 11934–11939.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. López-Arredondo DL, Leyva-González MA, González-Morales SI, López-Bucio J, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphate nutrition: improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65: 95–123. pmid:24579991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Poirier Y, Bucher M. Phosphate transport and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1: e0024. pmid:22303200
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 2002;296: 92–100. pmid:11935018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, et al. Phosphate Import in Plants: Focus on the PHT1 Transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2: 83. pmid:22645553
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Karthikeyan AS, Varadarajan DK, Mukatira UT, D’Urzo MP, Damsz B, Raghothama KG. Regulated expression of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters. Plant Physiol. 2002;130: 221–233. pmid:12226502
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Mudge SR, Rae AL, Diatloff E, Smith FW. Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;31: 341–353. pmid:12164813
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Shin H, Shin HS, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ. Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high-phosphate environments. Plant J. 2004;39: 629–642. pmid:15272879
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Paszkowski U, Kroken S, Roux C, Briggs SP. Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2002;99: 13324–13329.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Glassop D, Smith SE, Smith FW. Cereal phosphate transporters associated with the mycorrhizal pathway of phosphate uptake into roots. Planta. 2005;222: 688–698. pmid:16133217
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Güimil S, Chang HS, Zhu T, Sesma A, Osbourn A, Roux C, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 8066–8070.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Sun S, Gu M, Cao Y, Huang X, Zhang X, Ai P, et al. A constitutive expressed phosphate transporter, OsPht1;1, modulates phosphate uptake and translocation in phosphate-replete rice. Plant Physiol. 2012;159: 1571–1581. pmid:22649273
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Ai P, Sun S, Zhao J, Fan X, Xin W, Guo Q, et al. Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1;2 and OsPht1;6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. Plant J. 2009;57: 798–809. pmid:18980647
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Wang X, Wang Y, Piñeros MA, Wang Z, Wang W, Li C, et al. Phosphate transporters OsPHT1;9 and OsPHT1;10 are involved in phosphate uptake in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37: 1159–1170. pmid:24344809
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Chen J, Liu Y, Ni J, Wang Y, Bai Y, Shi J, et al. OsPHF1 regulates the plasma membrane localization of low- and high-affinity inorganic phosphate transporters and determines inorganic phosphate uptake and translocation in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;157: 269–278. pmid:21753117
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Jia H, Ren H, Gu M, Zhao J, Sun S, Zhang X, et al. The phosphate transporter gene OsPht1;8 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;156: 1164–1175. pmid:21502185
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Ye Y, Yuan J, Chang X, Yang M, Zhang L, Lu K, et al. The Phosphate Transporter Gene OsPht1;4 Is Involved in Phosphate Homeostasis in Rice. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0126186. pmid:25970642
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Yang SY, Gronlund M, Jakobsen I, Grotemeyer MS, Rentsch D, Miyao A, et al. Nonredundant regulation of rice arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by two members of the phosphate transporter1 gene family. Plant Cell. 2012;24: 4236–4251. pmid:23073651
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Rubio V, Linhares F, Solano R, Martín AC, Iglesias J, Leyva A, et al. A conserved MYB transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation signaling both in vascular plants and in unicellular algae. Genes Dev. 2001;15: 2122–2133. pmid:11511543
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Bustos R, Castrillo G, Linhares F, Puga MI, Rubio V, Pérez-Pérez J, et al. A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1001102. pmid:20838596
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Sun L, Song L, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Liu D. Arabidopsis PHL2 and PHR1 Act Redundantly as the Key Components of the Central Regulatory System Controlling Transcriptional Responses to Phosphate Starvation. Plant Physiol. 2016;170: 499–514. pmid:26586833
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Devaiah BN, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG. WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007;143: 1789–1801. pmid:17322336
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Wang H, Xu Q, Kong YH, Chen Y, Duan JY, Wu WH, et al. Arabidopsis WRKY45 transcription factor activates PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1;1 expression in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 2014;164: 2020–2029. pmid:24586044
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Su T, Xu Q, Zhang FC, Chen Y, Li LQ, Wu WH, et al. WRKY42 modulates phosphate homeostasis through regulating phosphate translocation and acquisition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015;167: 1579–1591. pmid:25733771
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Zhou J, Jiao F, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang X, He X, et al. OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants. Plant Physiol. 2008;146: 1673–1686. pmid:18263782
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Guo M, Ruan W, Li C, Huang F, Zeng M, Liu Y, et al. Integrative comparison of the role of the PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 subfamily in phosphate signaling and homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015;168: 1762–1776. pmid:26082401
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Valdés-López O, Arenas-Huertero C, Ramírez M, Girard L, Sánchez F, Vance CP, et al. Essential role of MYB transcription factor: PvPHR1 and microRNA: PvmiR399 in phosphorus-deficiency signalling in common bean roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31: 1834–1843. pmid:18771575
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Ren F, Guo QQ, Chang LL, Chen L, Zhao CZ, Zhong H, et al. Brassica napus PHR1 gene encoding a MYB-like protein functions in response to phosphate starvation. PLoS One. 2012;7: e44005. pmid:22952851
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Wang J, Sun J, Miao J, Guo J, Shi Z, He M, et al. A phosphate starvation response regulator Ta-PHR1 is involved in phosphate signalling and increases grain yield in wheat. Ann Bot. 2013;111: 1139–1153. pmid:23589634
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Dai X, Wang Y, Yang A, Zhang WH. OsMYB2P-1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in the regulation of phosphate-starvation responses and root architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 2012;159: 169–183. pmid:22395576
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Yang WT, Baek D, Yun DJ, Hwang WH, Park DS, Nam MH, et al. Overexpression of OsMYB4P, an R2R3-type MYB transcriptional activator, increases phosphate acquisition in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80: 259–267. pmid:24813725
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Toki S. Rapid and Efficient Agrobacterim-Mediated Transformation in Rice. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1997;15: 16–21.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Mohanty A, Sarma NP, Tyagi AK. Agrobacterium-mediated high frequency transformation of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 and transmission of the transgenes to R2 progeny. Plant Sci. 1999;147: 127–137.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Bechtold N, Pelletier G. In planta Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants by vacuum infiltration. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;82: 259–266. pmid:9664431
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Baek D, Kim MC, Chun HJ, Kang S, Park HC, Shin G, et al. Regulation of miR399f transcription by AtMYB2 affects phosphate starvation responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;161: 362–373. pmid:23154535
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Saleh A, Alvarez-Venegas R, Avramova Z. An efficient chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for studying histone modifications in Arabidopsis plants. Nat Protoc. 2008;3: 1018–1025. pmid:18536649
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Tiwari SB, Wang XJ, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. AUX/IAA proteins are active repressors, and their stability and activity are modulated by auxin. Plant Cell. 2001;13: 2809–2822. pmid:11752389
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Nilsson L, Müller R, Nielsen TH. Increased expression of the MYB-related transcription factor, PHR1, leads to enhanced phosphate uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30: 1499–1512. pmid:17927693
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Versaw WK, Harrison MJ. A chloroplast phosphate transporter, PHT2;1, influences allocation of phosphate within the plant and phosphate-starvation responses. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 1751–1766. pmid:12172020
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Zhu W, Miao Q, Sun D, Yang G, Wu C, Huang J, et al. The mitochondrial phosphate transporters modulate plant responses to salt stress via affecting ATP and gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 2012;7: e43530. pmid:22937061
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Jain A, Nagarajan VK, Raghothama KG. Transcriptional regulation of phosphate acquisition by higher plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 3207–3224. pmid:22899310
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Lin WY, Lin SI, Chiou TJ. Molecular regulators of phosphate homeostasis in plants. J Exp Bot. 2009;60: 1427–1438. pmid:19168668
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Gu M, Chen A, Sun S, Xu G. Complex Regulation of Plant Phosphate Transporters and the Gap between Molecular Mechanisms and Practical Application: What Is Missing? Mol Plant. 2016;9: 396–416. pmid:26714050
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, Mateos I, Puga MI, Rubio-Somoza I, et al. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007;39: 1033–1037. pmid:17643101
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Liu F, Wang Z, Ren H, Shen C, Li Y, Ling HQ, et al. OsSPX1 suppresses the function of OsPHR2 in the regulation of expression of OsPT2 and phosphate homeostasis in shoots of rice. Plant J. 2010;62: 508–517. pmid:20149131
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Allan AC, Hellens RP, Laing WA. MYB transcription factors that colour our fruit. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13: 99–102. pmid:18280199
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Cominelli E, Tonelli C. A new role for plant R2R3-MYB transcription factors in cell cycle regulation. Cell Res. 2009;19: 1231–1232. pmid:19881525
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
55. Katiyar A, Smita S, Lenka SK, Rajwanshi R, Chinnusamy V, Bansal KC. Genome-wide classification and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics. 2012;13: 544. pmid:23050870
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
56. Chiou TJ, Lin SI. Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62: 185–206. pmid:21370979
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
57. Yu B, Xu C, Benning C. Arabidopsis disrupted in SQD2 encoding sulfolipid synthase is impaired in phosphate-limited growth. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(8): 5732–5737.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K, Zhu JK. A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2015;15: 2038–2043.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR. PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006;141: 988–999. pmid:16679424
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, Su CL. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by MicroRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18: 412–421. pmid:16387831
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Abel S, Ticconi CA, Delatorre CA. Phosphate sensing in higher plants. Physiol Plant. 2002;115: 1–8. pmid:12010462
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
62. Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR, Liu J. A phosphate transporter from Medicago truncatula involved in the acquisition of phosphate released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 2413–2429. pmid:12368495
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
63. Ruan W, Guo M, Cai L, Hu H, Li C, Liu Y, et al. Genetic manipulation of a high-affinity PHR1 target cis-element to improve phosphorous uptake in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;87: 429–440. pmid:25657119
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Veneklaas EJ, Lambers H, Bragg J, Finnegan PM, Lovelock CE, Plaxton WC, et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytol. 2012;195: 306–320. pmid:22691045
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Zhang Z, Liao H, Lucas WJ. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56: 192–220. pmid:24417933
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Holford ICR. Soil phosphorus: its measurement and its uptake by plants. Aust J Soil Res. 1997;35: 227–239.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Raghothama KG. Phosphate acquisition. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999;50: 665–693. pmid:15012223
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] PubMed/NCBI

[15] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Yuan H, Liu D. Signaling components involved in plant responses to phosphate starvation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50: 849–859. pmid:18713395
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] PubMed/NCBI

[19] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, et al. Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiol. 2011;156: 997–1005. pmid:21571668
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[21] View Article

[22] PubMed/NCBI

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Franco-Zorrilla JM, González E, Bustos R, Linhares F, Leyva A, Paz-Ares J. The transcriptional control of plant responses to phosphate limitation. J Exp Bot. 2004;55: 285–293. pmid:14718495
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Misson J, Raghothama KG, Jain A, Jouhet J, Block MA, Bligny R, et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 11934–11939.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. López-Arredondo DL, Leyva-González MA, González-Morales SI, López-Bucio J, Herrera-Estrella L. Phosphate nutrition: improving low-phosphate tolerance in crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65: 95–123. pmid:24579991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] PubMed/NCBI

[34] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Poirier Y, Bucher M. Phosphate transport and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1: e0024. pmid:22303200
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[36] View Article

[37] PubMed/NCBI

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, et al. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 2002;296: 92–100. pmid:11935018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Nussaume L, Kanno S, Javot H, Marin E, Pochon N, Ayadi A, et al. Phosphate Import in Plants: Focus on the PHT1 Transporters. Front Plant Sci. 2011;2: 83. pmid:22645553
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Karthikeyan AS, Varadarajan DK, Mukatira UT, D’Urzo MP, Damsz B, Raghothama KG. Regulated expression of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters. Plant Physiol. 2002;130: 221–233. pmid:12226502
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Mudge SR, Rae AL, Diatloff E, Smith FW. Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002;31: 341–353. pmid:12164813
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Shin H, Shin HS, Dewbre GR, Harrison MJ. Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high-phosphate environments. Plant J. 2004;39: 629–642. pmid:15272879
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] PubMed/NCBI

[58] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Paszkowski U, Kroken S, Roux C, Briggs SP. Rice phosphate transporters include an evolutionarily divergent gene specifically activated in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2002;99: 13324–13329.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Glassop D, Smith SE, Smith FW. Cereal phosphate transporters associated with the mycorrhizal pathway of phosphate uptake into roots. Planta. 2005;222: 688–698. pmid:16133217
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Güimil S, Chang HS, Zhu T, Sesma A, Osbourn A, Roux C, et al. Comparative transcriptomics of rice reveals an ancient pattern of response to microbial colonization. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2005;102: 8066–8070.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Sun S, Gu M, Cao Y, Huang X, Zhang X, Ai P, et al. A constitutive expressed phosphate transporter, OsPht1;1, modulates phosphate uptake and translocation in phosphate-replete rice. Plant Physiol. 2012;159: 1571–1581. pmid:22649273
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ai P, Sun S, Zhao J, Fan X, Xin W, Guo Q, et al. Two rice phosphate transporters, OsPht1;2 and OsPht1;6, have different functions and kinetic properties in uptake and translocation. Plant J. 2009;57: 798–809. pmid:18980647
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Wang X, Wang Y, Piñeros MA, Wang Z, Wang W, Li C, et al. Phosphate transporters OsPHT1;9 and OsPHT1;10 are involved in phosphate uptake in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37: 1159–1170. pmid:24344809
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Chen J, Liu Y, Ni J, Wang Y, Bai Y, Shi J, et al. OsPHF1 regulates the plasma membrane localization of low- and high-affinity inorganic phosphate transporters and determines inorganic phosphate uptake and translocation in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;157: 269–278. pmid:21753117
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Jia H, Ren H, Gu M, Zhao J, Sun S, Zhang X, et al. The phosphate transporter gene OsPht1;8 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2011;156: 1164–1175. pmid:21502185
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Ye Y, Yuan J, Chang X, Yang M, Zhang L, Lu K, et al. The Phosphate Transporter Gene OsPht1;4 Is Involved in Phosphate Homeostasis in Rice. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0126186. pmid:25970642
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Yang SY, Gronlund M, Jakobsen I, Grotemeyer MS, Rentsch D, Miyao A, et al. Nonredundant regulation of rice arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by two members of the phosphate transporter1 gene family. Plant Cell. 2012;24: 4236–4251. pmid:23073651
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Rubio V, Linhares F, Solano R, Martín AC, Iglesias J, Leyva A, et al. A conserved MYB transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation signaling both in vascular plants and in unicellular algae. Genes Dev. 2001;15: 2122–2133. pmid:11511543
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Bustos R, Castrillo G, Linhares F, Puga MI, Rubio V, Pérez-Pérez J, et al. A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1001102. pmid:20838596
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Sun L, Song L, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Liu D. Arabidopsis PHL2 and PHR1 Act Redundantly as the Key Components of the Central Regulatory System Controlling Transcriptional Responses to Phosphate Starvation. Plant Physiol. 2016;170: 499–514. pmid:26586833
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Devaiah BN, Karthikeyan AS, Raghothama KG. WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007;143: 1789–1801. pmid:17322336
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Wang H, Xu Q, Kong YH, Chen Y, Duan JY, Wu WH, et al. Arabidopsis WRKY45 transcription factor activates PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1;1 expression in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 2014;164: 2020–2029. pmid:24586044
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Su T, Xu Q, Zhang FC, Chen Y, Li LQ, Wu WH, et al. WRKY42 modulates phosphate homeostasis through regulating phosphate translocation and acquisition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015;167: 1579–1591. pmid:25733771
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Zhou J, Jiao F, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang X, He X, et al. OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants. Plant Physiol. 2008;146: 1673–1686. pmid:18263782
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Guo M, Ruan W, Li C, Huang F, Zeng M, Liu Y, et al. Integrative comparison of the role of the PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 subfamily in phosphate signaling and homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015;168: 1762–1776. pmid:26082401
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Valdés-López O, Arenas-Huertero C, Ramírez M, Girard L, Sánchez F, Vance CP, et al. Essential role of MYB transcription factor: PvPHR1 and microRNA: PvmiR399 in phosphorus-deficiency signalling in common bean roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2008;31: 1834–1843. pmid:18771575
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Ren F, Guo QQ, Chang LL, Chen L, Zhao CZ, Zhong H, et al. Brassica napus PHR1 gene encoding a MYB-like protein functions in response to phosphate starvation. PLoS One. 2012;7: e44005. pmid:22952851
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Wang J, Sun J, Miao J, Guo J, Shi Z, He M, et al. A phosphate starvation response regulator Ta-PHR1 is involved in phosphate signalling and increases grain yield in wheat. Ann Bot. 2013;111: 1139–1153. pmid:23589634
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Dai X, Wang Y, Yang A, Zhang WH. OsMYB2P-1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in the regulation of phosphate-starvation responses and root architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 2012;159: 169–183. pmid:22395576
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Yang WT, Baek D, Yun DJ, Hwang WH, Park DS, Nam MH, et al. Overexpression of OsMYB4P, an R2R3-type MYB transcriptional activator, increases phosphate acquisition in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80: 259–267. pmid:24813725
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Toki S. Rapid and Efficient Agrobacterim-Mediated Transformation in Rice. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1997;15: 16–21.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Mohanty A, Sarma NP, Tyagi AK. Agrobacterium-mediated high frequency transformation of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 and transmission of the transgenes to R2 progeny. Plant Sci. 1999;147: 127–137.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Bechtold N, Pelletier G. In planta Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants by vacuum infiltration. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;82: 259–266. pmid:9664431
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] PubMed/NCBI

[158] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Baek D, Kim MC, Chun HJ, Kang S, Park HC, Shin G, et al. Regulation of miR399f transcription by AtMYB2 affects phosphate starvation responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;161: 362–373. pmid:23154535
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] PubMed/NCBI

[162] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Saleh A, Alvarez-Venegas R, Avramova Z. An efficient chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for studying histone modifications in Arabidopsis plants. Nat Protoc. 2008;3: 1018–1025. pmid:18536649
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[164] View Article

[165] PubMed/NCBI

[166] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Tiwari SB, Wang XJ, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. AUX/IAA proteins are active repressors, and their stability and activity are modulated by auxin. Plant Cell. 2001;13: 2809–2822. pmid:11752389
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] PubMed/NCBI

[170] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Nilsson L, Müller R, Nielsen TH. Increased expression of the MYB-related transcription factor, PHR1, leads to enhanced phosphate uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30: 1499–1512. pmid:17927693
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] PubMed/NCBI

[174] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Versaw WK, Harrison MJ. A chloroplast phosphate transporter, PHT2;1, influences allocation of phosphate within the plant and phosphate-starvation responses. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 1751–1766. pmid:12172020
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] PubMed/NCBI

[178] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Zhu W, Miao Q, Sun D, Yang G, Wu C, Huang J, et al. The mitochondrial phosphate transporters modulate plant responses to salt stress via affecting ATP and gibberellin metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 2012;7: e43530. pmid:22937061
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Jain A, Nagarajan VK, Raghothama KG. Transcriptional regulation of phosphate acquisition by higher plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 3207–3224. pmid:22899310
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Lin WY, Lin SI, Chiou TJ. Molecular regulators of phosphate homeostasis in plants. J Exp Bot. 2009;60: 1427–1438. pmid:19168668
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Gu M, Chen A, Sun S, Xu G. Complex Regulation of Plant Phosphate Transporters and the Gap between Molecular Mechanisms and Practical Application: What Is Missing? Mol Plant. 2016;9: 396–416. pmid:26714050
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] PubMed/NCBI

[194] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Franco-Zorrilla JM, Valli A, Todesco M, Mateos I, Puga MI, Rubio-Somoza I, et al. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat Genet. 2007;39: 1033–1037. pmid:17643101
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] PubMed/NCBI

[198] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Liu F, Wang Z, Ren H, Shen C, Li Y, Ling HQ, et al. OsSPX1 suppresses the function of OsPHR2 in the regulation of expression of OsPT2 and phosphate homeostasis in shoots of rice. Plant J. 2010;62: 508–517. pmid:20149131
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[200] View Article

[201] PubMed/NCBI

[202] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Allan AC, Hellens RP, Laing WA. MYB transcription factors that colour our fruit. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13: 99–102. pmid:18280199
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[204] View Article

[205] PubMed/NCBI

[206] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Cominelli E, Tonelli C. A new role for plant R2R3-MYB transcription factors in cell cycle regulation. Cell Res. 2009;19: 1231–1232. pmid:19881525
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[208] View Article

[209] PubMed/NCBI

[210] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Katiyar A, Smita S, Lenka SK, Rajwanshi R, Chinnusamy V, Bansal KC. Genome-wide classification and expression analysis of MYB transcription factor families in rice and Arabidopsis. BMC Genomics. 2012;13: 544. pmid:23050870
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[212] View Article

[213] PubMed/NCBI

[214] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Chiou TJ, Lin SI. Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2011;62: 185–206. pmid:21370979
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[216] View Article

[217] PubMed/NCBI

[218] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Yu B, Xu C, Benning C. Arabidopsis disrupted in SQD2 encoding sulfolipid synthase is impaired in phosphate-limited growth. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(8): 5732–5737.
View Article
Google Scholar

[220] View Article

[221] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K, Zhu JK. A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol. 2015;15: 2038–2043.
View Article
Google Scholar

[223] View Article

[224] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR. PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants. Plant Physiol. 2006;141: 988–999. pmid:16679424
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[226] View Article

[227] PubMed/NCBI

[228] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF, Su CL. Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by MicroRNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18: 412–421. pmid:16387831
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[230] View Article

[231] PubMed/NCBI

[232] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Abel S, Ticconi CA, Delatorre CA. Phosphate sensing in higher plants. Physiol Plant. 2002;115: 1–8. pmid:12010462
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[234] View Article

[235] PubMed/NCBI

[236] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR, Liu J. A phosphate transporter from Medicago truncatula involved in the acquisition of phosphate released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Cell. 2002;14: 2413–2429. pmid:12368495
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[238] View Article

[239] PubMed/NCBI

[240] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Ruan W, Guo M, Cai L, Hu H, Li C, Liu Y, et al. Genetic manipulation of a high-affinity PHR1 target cis-element to improve phosphorous uptake in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol Biol. 2015;87: 429–440. pmid:25657119
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[242] View Article

[243] PubMed/NCBI

[244] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

In silico analysis

Plasmid construction

Generation of OsMYB5P transgenic plants

Transient analysis in Arabidopsis protoplasts

Gene expression analysis

Measurements of total Pi content in plants

Protein expression and purification

Preparation of OsMYB5P antibody

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)

Results

Characterization of OsMYB5P in rice

OsMYB5P modulates plant development and Pi uptake in rice

OsMYB5P is associated with OsPT5 gene expression through MBS motifs

Absence of OsPT5 affects Pi-starvation responses in rice

OsMYB5P affects expression of rice PSI genes

Overexpression of OsMYB5P increases Pi accumulation and Pi-starvation responses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants

OsMYB5P regulates expression of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters

Discussion

Specific function of OsMYB5P in Pi homeostasis in rice

Overexpression of OsMYB5P confers tolerance to Pi deprivation in plants

OsMYB5P is a positive regulator that maintains Pi homeostasis in plants

Conclusions

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-OX plants under Pi deficiency.

S2 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-RNAi plants to Pi deficiency.

S3 Fig. Expression of OsMYB5P in WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

S4 Fig. Biomass analysis of OsMYB5P transgenic plants to Pi deficiency.

S5 Fig. Characterization of ospt5 mutant in rice.

S6 Fig. Physiological phenotypes of OsMYB5P-OX, OsMYB5P-RNAi and ospt5 plants to Pi deficiency.

S7 Fig. OsMYB5P associated with OsPT5 in OsMYB5P-RNAi plants.

S8 Fig. Expression of OsMYB5P in Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

S9 Fig. Development of lateral roots in Arabidopsis OsMYB5P transgenic plants during Pi deficiency.

S10 Fig. Expression of Arabidopsis PT genes in the Arabidopsis WT and OsMYB5P transgenic plants.

S11 Fig. Schematic structure of OsMYB5P.

S1 Table. Putative MBS cis-elements in the promoter of rice phosphate transporters (OsPTs).

S2 Table. Putative MBS cis-elements in the promoter of Arabidopsis phosphate transporters (AtPhts).

S3 Table. Primer lists for our studies.

References