http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-7685
Figures
Abstract
Objective
To estimate the global and country-level burden of overweight and obesity among pregnant women from 2005 to 2014.
Methods
Publicly accessible country-level data were collected from the World Health Organization, the World Bank and the Food and Agricultural Organization. We estimated the number of overweight and obese pregnant women among 184 countries and determined the time-related trend from 2005 to 2014. Based on panel data model, we determined the effects of food energy supply, urbanization, gross national income and female employment on the number of overweight and obese pregnant women.
Results
We estimated that 38.9 million overweight and obese pregnant women and 14.6 million obese pregnant women existed globally in 2014. In upper middle income countries and lower middle income countries, there were sharp increases in the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. In 2014, the percentage of female with overweight and obesity in India was 21.7%, and India had the largest number of overweight and obese pregnant women (4.3 million), which accounted for 11.1% in the world. In the United States of America, a third of women were obese, and the number of obese pregnant women was 1.1 million. In high income countries, caloric supply and urbanization were positively associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. The percentage of employment in agriculture was inversely associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women, but only in upper middle income countries and lower middle income countries.
Conclusion
The number of overweight and obese pregnant women has increased in high income and middle income countries. Environmental changes could lead to increased caloric supply and decreased energy expenditure among women. National and local governments should work together to create a healthy food environment.
Citation: Chen C, Xu X, Yan Y (2018) Estimated global overweight and obesity burden in pregnant women based on panel data model. PLoS ONE 13(8): e0202183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183
Editor: Rebecca Painter, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, NETHERLANDS
Received: November 27, 2017; Accepted: July 29, 2018; Published: August 9, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81373101, 81673276).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Obesity is a growing public health hazard worldwide. The proportion of global adult women with overweight increased from 29.8% (29.3–30.2%) in 1980 to 38.0% (37.5–38.5%) in 2013, and the increasing trend was observed in both high income and middle income countries [1]. Among pregnant women, increased body mass index (BMI) was associated with numerous pregnancy related complications, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia [2, 3]. Women with overweight or obesity involved a relatively high risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Previous experts reported a odds ratio (OR) for severe maternal morbidity of 1.1 for women with obesity class 1 (BMI 30.0–34.9) compared with women with normal weight (BMI 18.5–24.9) [4]. The OR for obesity class 2 (BMI 35.0–39.8) was 1.2, and for obesity class 3 (BMI ≥40) was 1.4. Maternal obesity also increased perinatal mortality. A previous cohort study found that maternal obesity was associated with nearly 25% of stillbirth that occurred between 37 and 42 weeks’ gestation [5]. In addition, overweight and obesity were associated with elevated risks of fetal macrosomia, some birth defects, and metabolic disease of children [6,7].
Considering the affect of pregnancy overweight and obesity on mothers and infants, it is need to investigate the burden of overweight and obesity among pregnant women. Thirty-two percent of Swedish pregnant women were overweight or obese in 2008–2010 [8]. The prevalence of overweight among pregnant women in Iceland increased form 25.9% to 27.7% within nine years [9]. According to a retrospective cohort study in Canada, twenty-two percent of pregnant women were obese and 24% were overweight in 2004–2014 [10]. A recent meta analysis reported that the prevalence of maternal obesity in Africa ranged from 6.5% to 50.7% [11]. However, previous studies exploring the prevalence of overweight and obesity among pregnant women were limited by the focus on a single country. The global burden of overweight and obesity among pregnant women remained unclear.
Many previous studies explored obesity of pregnant women and its determinants. For low-income women, fast food intake can increase caloric supply, which is sufficient to explain the increase of BMI in pregnant women [12, 13]. Compared with metropolitan residents, rural residents were more likely to be overweight and obese in many countries, such as the United States of America and China [14, 15]. However, countries with high rates of urbanization usually have higher rates of obesity than those with low rates of urbanization. A previous system review found a consistent positive association between urbanization and obesity in many countries in Southeast Asia, and the association was greater in low gross national income (GNI) countries [16]. Experts argued that urbanization could tip the balance between energy intake and energy expenditure, namely decreases in physical activity and increases in the consumption of cheap fast food [17]. Urbanization is usually accompanied by the transformation of industrial structure. In middle income and low income countries, a growing number of female work in service sectors. Occupational physical activity is an important determinant of daily energy expenditure. A previous study found that women in the sedentary occupation group had a higher risk of obesity compared to those in the agricultural occupation group if they had no education [18].
Although the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Global Burden of Disease study (GBD) provided data of obesity and overweight data among adults [19], those data has not been fully used to explore the prevalence of obesity and overweight among pregnant women. It is needed to explore more evidence about overweight and obesity among pregnant women. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the global and country-level number of overweight and obesity among pregnant women from 2005 to 2014; (2) identify relative contributions of economic development, caloric supply, urbanization and female employment to the number of overweight and obese pregnant women.
Methods
Data sources
We derived an estimate of the number of overweight and obese pregnant women using publicly accessible country-level estimates of the following parameters: total population [20], crude birth rate [21], estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity in female [22]. In each country, the estimated overweight and obesity prevalence rate in female (>18 years) was age-standardized. We collected overweight and obesity data of 195 countries, birth rate data of 255 countries and population data of 265 countries. We excluded countries with missing data, and data of 184 countries form 2005 to 2014 were used in the final study. Eleven countries with missing data were excluded, namely Cook Islands, Monaco, Nauru, Niue, Saint kitts and Nevis, San Marino, South Sudan, Sudan, Sudan (former), Tuvalu and Dominica.
To evaluate the contribution of energy intake to overweight and obesity, we collected data of the food balance sheets (FBS) from the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) [23]. The FBS data were compiled from national accounts of the supply and use of foods. The data provided a comprehensive picture of food consumption at country-level, and reflected the increasing trend of per capita caloric supply. The database of FBS were updated in 2017, and the latest data were food supply in 2013. To reflect the changes of social demographic and economic characteristics, we also collected urbanization data, GNI data, and employment data from the World Bank [24]. Urbanization was the percentage of population residing in urban areas in each country according to national definition. GNI per capita data were in current U.S. dollars, divided by the midyear population, and deflated base on consumer price indexes. The indicators of employment were the percentages of employment in different industries of all female employment, including employment in industries, employment in services and employment in agriculture. Those factors were most ubiquitous in country-level and associated with the energy balance. In July 2017, we collected data of 184 countries form 2005 to 2013.
Estimating the burden of overweight and obesity in pregnant women
BMI is defined as the weight in Kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters (Kg/m2) [25]. According to data in the WHO, a BMI of 25.0 kg/m2 or more is classified as overweight and obesity, and a BMI of 30.0 kg/m2 or more is defined as obesity. The point estimated number of overweight pregnant women was obtained using the following formula:
Estimated number of overweight pregnant women = Total population×crude birth prevalence of overweight in female.
We multiplied the total population by the crude birth rate, and then by the average gestational period (280 days), to calculate the number of pregnant days, per country. By dividing the number by 365 days, we estimated the number of women pregnant on any given days during the year. Finally, by multiplying this number by the overweight prevalence, we calculated a point estimate of the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. Similarly, the number of obese pregnant women was calculated using the same method. This formula was adapted form a previous study which provided a useful method to estimate the number of pregnant women [26]. Country-level pointed estimates were added together to generate the global estimates of the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. According to the 95% confidence intervals of the overweight and obesity data, sensitivity analyses were used to provided the upper and lower bounds of the estimate number of overweight and obese pregnant women.
Data analysis
Panel data were often termed time series and cross section data[27]. Compared with singular time series or cross-sectional analysis, panel data carried more information about the heterogeneity of individuals. The general model of the panel data can be described as the following formula:
yit refers to an explained variable and xit is an explanatory variable. i = 1…N refers to the individual index. t = 1…T refers to the time index. αit is the intercept and μit shows the error term with classic assumptions. βit represents the coefficient of xit.
According to different interceptions, panel data model includes three kinds of model, namely random effects model, pooled effects model and fixed effects model. We used the F test to choose fixed or pooled effects specification. Then, we used the Hausman test to choose fixed or random effects specification[28]. We used multivariable panel data models, and adjusted beta coefficients were provided. Significance level was set as p <0.05, and the p value used a two sided test. Microsoft Excel and R software version 3.3.1. were used to analyse these data.
Results
Countries were divided into four groups by the World Bank, namely high income countries (HICs), upper middle income countries (UMICs), lower middle income countries (LMICs) and low income countries (LICs). There were 52 HICs, 53 UMICs, 49 LMICs, and 30 LICs. We estimated that there were 38.9 million overweight and obese pregnant women and 14.6 million obese pregnant women in 2014 (Table 1). LMICs carried the greatest burden of overweight and obesity in pregnant women, and UMICs carried the greatest burden of obesity in pregnant women. The burden of obesity in pregnant women was lower in LICs than in other countries. Data of 184 countries was provided in S1 and S2 Figs.
The increasing trends of overweight and obese pregnant women were observed in all income groups, but with different increasing patterns (Figs 1 and 2). LICs had the lowest number of overweight and obese pregnant women for many years. The number of overweight and obese pregnant women in UMICs and LMICs had a sharp increase. The number of obese pregnant women in UMICs was at a high level from 2005 to 2013. Although the number of obese pregnant women in LICs was at a low level, there was a increasing trend over that time period.
Estimates for 20 countries with the highest overweight and obesity burden in pregnant women were presented in Tables 2 and 3. In 2014, the percentage of female with overweight and obesity in India was 21.7%. India had the largest number of overweight and obese pregnant women (4.3 million), which accounted for the largest proportion (11.1%) in the world. The increases of overweight and obese pregnant women in some countries were more than 50%, such as Nigeria (55.4%), Democratic Republic of the Congo (53.4%) and United Republic of Tanzania (59.3%). For some countries with a high rate of overweight and obesity, the changes in ten years were small, such as United States of America (3.8%), Mexico (5.3%) and Turkey (5.9%). As the birth rate of Brazil decreased form 18.078 per 1000 people in 2005 to 14.727 per 1000 people in 2014, the number of overweight and obese pregnant women decreased by 1.7%. The United States of America had the largest number of obese pregnant women (1.07 million) in 2014. China also had 1.06 million obese pregnant women, and the number increased by 71.2% in ten years. For some countries with a high birth rate, the number of obese pregnant women was even doubled in ten years, such as Nigeria (96.9%), Democratic Republic of the Congo (102.2%), and United Republic of Tanzania (111.6%).
The changes in urbanization of different income groups were presented in S1 Table. In 2013, the urbanization rate in HICs and UMICs reached 80.6% and 63.7%, respectively. The urbanization rate in LMICs increased form 38.5% in 2005 to 41.5% in 2013. GNI of UMICs and LMICs increased by 50.2% and 54.0%, respectively (S2 Table). The Changes in caloric supply were presented in S3 Table. Caloric supply in HICs increased from 3221.0 kcal/capita/day in 2005 to 3263 kcal/capita/day in 2013. Caloric supply in LICs was 2324.4 kcal/capita/day in 2013, and increased by 5.8% (128 kcal/capita/day) in nine years. For many countries, the percentage of employment in agriculture decreased, while the percentage of employment in services increased (S4 Table). In 2013, the percentage of employment in agriculture was 1.8% in HICs, 9.3% in UMICs, 37.4% in LMICs, and 73.6% in LICs. For female in LMICs, the percentage of employment in services increased form 39.5% in 2005 to 50.7% in 2013.
As three indicators of employment were related to each other, we chose the percentage of employment in agriculture as the proxy of changes in occupational physical activity. According to the results of F test and Hausman test, random effects model was used for HICs, UMICs and LICs, and fixed effects model was used for LIMCs. For HICs, caloric supply (p = 0.001) and urbanization (p = 0.026) were positively associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women, and GNI (p = 0.004) was significantly associated with the number of obese pregnant women (Table 4). For UMICs and LMICs, the effect of caloric supply on the number of overweight and obese pregnant women was insignificant, and the percentage of employment in agriculture was inverse associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. For LICs, urbanization (p = 0.005) and GNI (p<0.001)were significantly associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women.
Discussion
The large number of overweight and obese pregnant women was a huge burden on health care. This study estimated that nearly forty million pregnant women were overweight or obese in the world in 2014. More than 70% of overweight pregnant women occurred in UMICs and LMICs, owing to a large population and a high birth rate in those countries. The number of overweight and obese pregnant women increased rapidly in middle income countries from 2005 to 2014, especially in India, China and Nigeria. In many countries, more than half of women were overweight, and nearly a third of women were obese, such as Egypt, Turkey, Iran, and South Africa. More adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were observed in women with overweight and obesity. A previous study in Iranian found that pregnant women with obesity were 4 times more likely to develop gestational hypertension compared to those with normal weight [29]. Maternal obesity also increased the risk of fetal macrosomia, cardiac breaks, neural tube defects, and fetal death [30, 31, 32]. Health care providers should pay more attention to the adverse effects of obesity on maternal and fetal.
For HICs, the burden of overweight and obesity among pregnant women has been in a high level for many years.The increases of the number of overweight and obese pregnant women in UMICs and LMICs were faster than those in HICs. Those changes suggested a worldwide time-related phenomenon rather than a country-specific trend [33]. Previous studies found a slowdown in the increase rate of overweight and obesity in HICs, which provided some hope that the epidemic might had peaked in developed countries and that the populations in middle income countries might not reach the very high rates of over 40% [1]. However, considering the large population and the increasing rate of overweight in middle income countries, the burden of maternal overweight in those countries would be more serious in future.
Given that an increasing number of people lived in urban area, food environment and diseases of urban residents changed a lot [33, 34]. We found that urbanization was associated with the increasing number of overweight and obese pregnant women. City life can be more sedentary than rural life. A previous study found that BMI of urban residents was lower in countries with more land devoted to parks, which were sites for physical activity,walking and cycling [35]. A recent study in Seoul found that the number of sports facilities in urban were negatively associated with the probability of obesity [36]. City life also changes the availability of food, especially fast foods and energy-dense foods. Previous studies found that supermarkets were associated with a higher BMI among black adults [37]. The presence of convenience stores and fast food restaurants was a driver of weight excess, which usually offered energy-dense foods [38]. Although similar results shows that city life is associated with a higher risk of obesity than rural life, findings in the literature are not always consistent. A previous study found that the prevalence of obesity among women was higher in rural than in urban (33.4% vs 28.2%), and potential risk factors were lower leisure-time, intake of fiber and fruits and higher intake of sweetened beverages [39].
We found that food energy supply increased in many countries from 2005 to 2013. Previous studies in Venezuela and Ireland also reported a increasing trend of energy supply between 1961 and 2007 [40, 41]. We found that energy supply in HICs has been in a high level for many years. Compared with China and Japan, the consumption of total meat was higher in European Union, the United State of America and Canada [42]. This study found that caloric supply was a risk factor for the huge number of pregnant women with overweight in HICs, but not in other income group countries. A previous study about 69 countries also reported that the association between the change in food energy supply and the change in average body weight was significant for HICs [43]. For LICs, the increase of caloric supply might be a sign of improved nutrition.
This study found that GNI was positively associated with the number of obese pregnant women in all income groups. A previous study in thirty-three less developed countries found that GNI was positively associated with overweight among mothers [44]. Economic development can reduce food prices, especially prices of unhealthful foods. A previous study even reported that approximately 18% of growth in obesity could be attributed to relative food prices reduction between 1976 and 2001 [45]. This study found that the percentage of employment in agriculture was inversely associated with the number of overweight and obese pregnant women, but only in UMICs and LMICs. The main change in UMICs and LMICs was that a growing number of women were occupied in service sectors rather than in agriculture. Owing to the reduction in occupational physical activity, daily energy output among women has decreased by more than 100 kcal/day over the past 5 decades [46]. A study in Malaysia also reported that low occupational physical activity in middle-aged women was associated with higher risks of obesity and abdominal obesity [47].
Considering a growing number of overweight and obese pregnant women in both high income and middle income countries, health workers are faced with a huge challenge of reducing unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. According to the Institute of Medicine, the recommend GWG for overweight pregnant women is 7–11.9 kg and for obese pregnant women is 5–9 kg [48]. Dietary interventions and physical activity interventions were recommended to limit GWG and prevent GDM in overweight and obese pregnant women [49, 50, 51]. However, a randomised controlled trail in UK found that dietary and physical interventions in pregnant women with obesity were not adequate to prevent GDM or large-for-gestational-age infants, and a recent study in Australia also reported no significant differences in GDM between the behavioural nutrition intervention group and the control group after adjusting confounding factors [52,53]. From a public health perspective, it is a cost-effective strategy to control the prevalence of obesity among women of childbearing age. Women should be informed the potential risk of fast food and the importance of a normal weight for pregnant women. As the environment makes it easier to become overweight and obese, national and local governments should promote a health food environment, such as portion control, high calories food availability and media restrictions [54].
Some limitations exist in this study. Firstly, the data of overweight and obesity on reproductive age might be better than those across the whole age range. Unfortunately, data on reproductive age of many countries were not available form public accessible database. As the status of overweight and obesity can last for a long time, the present data can be used to approximate the number of overweight and obese pregnant women. Secondly, the definition of overweight and obesity is different in different regions, which can not be reflected in these international data. Overweight is defined as a BMI 25.0 to <30.0 kg/m2 by the WHO, and a BMI of 30.0 kg/m2 or more is defined as obesity. However, WHO Asia Pacific guidelines suggest that overweight is defined as BMI 23–27.49 kg/m2, and obesity is defined as BMI ≥ 27.5kg/m2 [55]. The overweight and obesity rate in some Asia countries would be underestimated using the former definition [55]. In the 2011 China Health and Nutrition Survey, obesity was defined as BMI ≥28.0 kg/m2, and the age-adjusted prevalence of obesity among women was 11.0%, which was higher than the prevalence provided by the WHO (7.1%) [56]. Thirdly, the level of urbanization, namely large metropolitan, small metropolitan and micropolitan, is also an important factor. Urbanization rate can not reflect these important information. Finally, this study used country as the unit of analysis in the panel data model, which might lead to ecological fallacy. We should not use country-level statistical findings to make inferences about the energy balance of individuals.
Conclusion
There was a great increase of the number of overweight and obese pregnant women in both high income and middle income countries. Those data demonstrated that food energy supply, urbanization rate, GNI and employment in agriculture were associated with the burden of overweight and obese among pregnant women. In order to control obesity among pregnant women, national and local governments need to create a healthy food environment.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. The estimated number of overweight and obese pregnant women in 184 countries in 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. The estimated number of obese pregnant women in 184 countries in 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s002
(TIF)
S1 Table. Changes of urban population in different income groups from 2005 to 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s003
(DOC)
S2 Table. Changes of gross national income in different income groups from 2005 to 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s004
(DOC)
S3 Table. Changes of food supply in different income groups from 2005 to 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s005
(DOC)
S4 Table. Employment in different industries of all female employment from 2005 to 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202183.s006
(DOC)
References
- 1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet. 2014; 384 (9945):766–781. pmid:24880830
- 2. Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, Olander EK, Begley C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obesity Reviews. 2015; 16(8):621–638. pmid:26016557
- 3. Ijas H, Morin-Papunen L, Keranen AK, Bloigu R, Ruokonen A, Puukka K, et al. Pre-pregnancy overweight overtakes gestational diabetes as a risk factor for subsequent metabolic syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013; 169(5):605–611. pmid:23959786
- 4. Lisonkova S, Muraca GM, Potts J, Liauw J, Chan WS, Skoll A, et al. Association Between Prepregnancy Body Mass Index and Severe Maternal Morbidity. JAMA. 2017; 318 (18):1777–1786. pmid:29136442
- 5. Yao R, Ananth CV, Park BY, Pereira L, Plante LA, Perinatal Research Consortium. Obesity and the risk of stillbirth: a population-based cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210(5):451–457. pmid:24674712
- 6. Wang LF, Wang HJ, Ao D, Liu Z, Wang Y, Yang HX. Influence of pre-pregnancy obesity on the development of macrosomia and large for gestational age in women with or without gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese population. J Perinatol. 2015; 35(12):985–990. pmid:26401753
- 7. Parnell AS, Correa A, Reece EA. Pre-pregnancy Obesity as a Modifier of Gestational Diabetes and Birth Defects Associations: A Systematic Review. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2017; 21(5):1105–1120. pmid:28120287
- 8. Bjermo H, Lind S, Rasmussen F. The educational gradient of obesity increases among Swedish pregnant women: a register-based study. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:315. pmid:25886465.
- 9. Eiriksdottir VH, Valdimarsdottir UA, Asgeirsdottir TL, Gisladottir A, Lund SH, Hauksdottir A, et al. Smoking and obesity among pregnant women in Iceland 2001–2010. European Journal of Public Health 2015; 25(4):638–643. pmid:25829507.
- 10. MacInnis N, Woolcott CG, McDonald S, Kuhle S. Population Attributable Risk Fractions of Maternal Overweight and Obesity for Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6:22895. pmid:26961675.
- 11. Onubi OJ, Marais D, Aucott L, Okonofua F, Poobalan AS. Maternal obesity in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Public Health. 2015; 38(3):e218–e231. pmid:26487702.
- 12. Chang M, Brown R, Nitzke S. Fast Food Intake in Relation to Employment Status, Stress, Depression, and Dietary Behaviors in Low-Income Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2016; 20(7): 1506–17. pmid:26973147.
- 13. Fowles ER, Timmerman GM, Bryant M, Kim S. Eating at Fast-Food Restaurants and Dietary Quality in Low-Income Pregnant Women. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2011; 33(5):630–651. pmid:21131508.
- 14. Tian X, Zhao G, Li Y, Wang L, Shi Y. Overweight and obesity difference of Chinese population between different urbanization levels. J Rural Health. 2014; 30(1):101–12. pmid:24383489.
- 15. Voss JD, Masuoka P, Webber BJ, Scher AI, Atkinson RL. Association of elevation, urbanization and ambient temperature with obesity prevalence in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013; 37(10):1407–12. pmid:23357956.
- 16. Angkurawaranon C, Jiraporncharoen W, Chenthanakij B, Doyle P, Nitsch D. Urban Environments and Obesity in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(11):e113547. pmid:25426942.
- 17. Bleich S, Cutler D FAU Murray C, Murray C FAU Adams A, Adams A. Why is the developed world obese? Annual Review of Public Health. 2008; 29:273–95. pmid:18173389.
- 18. Aitsi-Selmi A, Chen R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG. Education is associated with lower levels of abdominal obesity in women with a non-agricultural occupation: an interaction study using China's Four Provinces survey. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:769. pmid:23962144.
- 19. GBD 2015 obesity collaborators, Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(1):13–27. pmid:28604169.
- 20.
United Nations. World Population Prospects 2017. [cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/
- 21.
United Nations. World Population Prospects 2017. [cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Fertility/.
- 22.
World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory data repository. [cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.A896?lang=en.
- 23.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Balance Sheets. [cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS.
- 24.
The World Bank. World Development Indicators. [cited 2017 Jun 23]. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.MKTP.PP.CD?view=chart.
- 25.
World Health Organization, Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation (WHO Technical Report Series 894). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
- 26. Sugarman J, Colvin C, Moran AC, Oxlade O. Tuberculosis in pregnancy: an estimate of the global burden of disease. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2(12):e710–6. pmid:25433626.
- 27. Deation A. Panel data model time series of cross-sections. Journal of Econometrics 1985; 30:109–26.
- 28. Sha T, Yan Y, Gao X, Xiang S, Zeng G, Liu S, et al. Association between Sleep and Body Weight: A Panel Data Model Based on a Retrospective Longitudinal Cohort of Chinese Infants. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(5). pmid:28441347
- 29. Kazemian E, Sotoudeh G, Dorosty-Motlagh AR, Eshraghian MR, Bagheri M. Maternal obesity and energy intake as risk factors of pregnancy-induced hypertension among Iranian women. J Health Popul Nutr. 2014; 32(3):486–93. pmid:25395911.
- 30. Talebian A, Soltani B, Sehat M, Zahedi A, Noorian A, Talebian M. Incidence and Risk Factors of Neural Tube Defects in Kashan, Central Iran. Iran J Child Neurol. 2015; 9(3):50–6. pmid:26401153.
- 31. Taheri M, Dehghani A, Noorishadkam M, Tabatabaei SM. Population attributable danger of hereditary heart breaks. Risk factors among newborns in Yazd, Iran. J Med Life. 2015; 8(Spec Iss 3): 212–7. pmid:28316693.
- 32. Usta A, Usta CS, Yildiz A, Ozcaglayan R, Dalkiran ES, et al. Frequency of fetal macrosomia and the associated risk factors in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 26:62. pmid:28451039.
- 33. Wu Y, Xue H, Wang H, Su C, Du S, Wang Y. The impact of urbanization on the community food environment in China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017; 26(3):504–13. pmid:28429917.
- 34. Goryakin Y., Rocco L., Suhrcke M. The contribution of urbanization to non-communicable diseases: Evidence from 173 countries from 1980 to 2008. Economics & Human Biology. 2017; 26:151–63. pmid:28410489.
- 35. Ewing R, Meakins G, Hamidi S, Nelson AC. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity–Update and refinement. Health & Place. 2014; 26:118–26. pmid:24434082.
- 36. Kim J, Shon C, & Yi S. The Relationship between Obesity and Urban Environment in Seoul. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(8). pmid:28792465.
- 37. Hosler AS, Michaels IH, & Buckenmeyer EM. Food Shopping Venues, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Body Mass Index Among Guyanese, Black, and White Adults in an Urban Community in the US. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2016; 48(6):361–8. pmid:27085256.
- 38. Michimi A, Wimberly MC. The food environment and adult obesity in US metropolitan areas. Geospat Health. 2015; 10(2):368. pmid:26618317.
- 39. Trivedi T, Liu J, Probst J, Merchant A, Jhones S, Martin AB. Obesity and obesity-related behaviors among rural and urban adults in the USA. Rural and remote health. 2015; 15(4):3267. pmid:26458564.
- 40. Sheehy T, Sharma S. Trends in energy and nutrient supply in Trinidad and Tobago from 1961 to 2007 using FAO food balance sheets. Public Health Nutrition. 2013; 16(9):1693–1702. pmid:23286774.
- 41. Sheehy T, Sharma S. The nutrition transition in the Republic of Ireland: trends in energy and nutrient supply from 1961 to 2007 using Food and Agriculture Organization food balance sheets. British Journal of Nutrition. 2011; 106(7):1078–89. pmid:21481289.
- 42. Forsyth S, Gautier S, Salem Jr. N. Global Estimates of Dietary Intake of Docosahexaenoic Acid and Arachidonic Acid in Developing and Developed Countries. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2016; 68:258–67. pmid:27288396.
- 43. Vandevijvere S, Chow CC, Hall KD, Umali E, Swinburn BA. Increased food energy supply as a major driver of the obesity epidemic: a global analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2015; 93(7):446–56. pmid:26170502.
- 44. Van Hook J, Altman CE, Balistreri KS. Global patterns in overweight among children and mothers in less developed countries. Public Health Nutrition. 2013; 16(4):573–81. pmid:22583613.
- 45. Xu X, Variyam JN, Zhao Z, Chaloupka FJ. Relative Food Prices and Obesity in U.S. Metropolitan Areas: 1976–2001. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(12):e114707. pmid:25502888.
- 46. Gonzalez-Gross M, Melendez A. Sedentarism, active lifestyle and sport: Impact on health and obesity prevention. Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28 Suppl 5: 89–98. pmid:24010748.
- 47. Chu AH, Moy FM. Associations of occupational, transportation, household and leisure-time physical activity patterns with metabolic risk factors among middle-aged adults in a middle-income country. Prev Med. 2013; 57 Suppl:S14–7. pmid:23276774.
- 48.
Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 2009.
- 49. International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group. Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2017; 358: j3119. pmid:28724518.
- 50. Yeo S, Walker JS, Caughey MC, Ferraro AM, Asafu-Adjei JK. What characteristics of nutrition and physical activity interventions are key to effectively reducing weight gain in obese or overweight pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2017; 18(4):385–99. pmid:28177566.
- 51. Lamminpaa R, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Schwab U. A systematic review of dietary interventions for gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes in overweight and obese pregnant women. Eur J Nutr. 2017. pmid:29128995.
- 52. Poston L, Bell R, Croker H, Flynn AC, Godfrey KM, Goff L, et al. Effect of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnant women (the UPBEAT study): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015; 3(10):767–77. pmid:26165396.
- 53. Opie RS, Neff M, Tierney AC. A behavioural nutrition intervention for obese pregnant women: Effects on diet quality, weight gain and the incidence of gestational diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016; 56(4):364–73. pmid:27170563.
- 54. Seidell JC, Halberstadt J. The Global Burden of Obesity and the Challenges of Prevention. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2015; 66 suppl 2:7–12. pmid:26045323.
- 55. Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Joshi SR, Bhansali A, Deepa M, Joshi PP, et al. Prevalence of generalized & abdominal obesity in urban & rural India-the ICMR-INDIAB Study (Phase-I) [ICMR- NDIAB-3]. Indian J Med Res. 2015; 142(2):139–50. pmid:26354211.
- 56. Mi YJ, Zhang B, Wang HJ, Yan J, Han W, Zhao J, et al. Prevalence and Secular Trends in Obesity Among Chinese Adults, 1991–2011. Am J Prev Med 2015; 49(5):661–9. pmid:26275960.