Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Estimation of HIV incidence and its trend in three key populations in Iran

  • Hamid Sharifi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

  • Ali Mirzazadeh ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    ali.mirzazadeh@ucsf.edu

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America

  • Mostafa Shokoohi,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

  • Mohammad Karamouzian,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Razieh Khajehkazemi,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

  • Soodabeh Navadeh,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America

  • Noushin Fahimfar,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Ahmad Danesh,

    Roles Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Health and Social Medicine, Gorgan, Iran

  • Mehdi Osooli,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, Department of Translational Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

  • Willi McFarland,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America, Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America

  • Mohammad Mehdi Gouya,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Ali Akbar Haghdoost

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

In Iran, People Who Inject Drugs (PWID), Female Sex Workers (FSW), and prisoners are the main key populations at risk of HIV infection. This study aimed to evaluate the trend of HIV incidence among PWID, FSW and prisoners as an impact measure of HIV harm reduction and prevention efforts in Iran. Data were obtained from the two rounds of national bio-behavioral surveillance surveys among FSW (2010 (n = 872), 2015 (n = 1339)), PWID (2010 (n = 2417), 2014 (n = 2307)), and prisoners (2009 (n = 4536), 2013 (n = 5390)) through facility-based (FSW and PWID surveys) and cluster sampling (prisoner surveys). Time-at-risk was calculated assuming the age at first sex or drug injection as the beginning of the at-risk period and the age at the time of the interview or date when they received a positive HIV test result as the end of this period, adjusted for interval censoring. HIV incidence among PWID in 2014 was 5.39 (95% CI 4.71, 6.16) per 1,000 person-years (PY), significantly lower than in 2009 (17.07, 95% CI 15.34, 19.34). Similarly, HIV incidence was 1.12 (95% CI 0.77, 1.64) per 1,000 PY among FSW in 2015, a significant drop from 2010 (2.38, 95% CI 1.66, 3.40). Also, HIV incidence decreased among prisoners from 1.34 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.67) in 2009 to 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.61) per 1,000 PY in 2013. Our findings suggest that after an increase in the 2000s, the HIV incidence may have been decreased and stabilized among key populations in Iran.

Introduction

Iran has a concentrated epidemic, the largest epidemic of HIV in the Middle East [1], with an HIV prevalence of 13.8% (2014) to 15.4% (2010) [2, 3] among people who inject drugs (PWID), 2.1% (2015) to 4.5% (2010) [4, 5] among female sex workers (FSW), and 2.1% (2009) to 1.4% (2013) [6, 7] among prisoners. So far, we have no data on HIV prevalence among other key populations such as men who have sex with men and transgender living in Iran. While most HIV transmissions in Iran (67.2%) have been attributed to injecting drug use, there has been an apparent recent shift to sexual transmission of the virus [8, 9]. An estimated around 75,700 people are living with HIV in Iran, around one-third of them have been diagnosed by 2015[8, 10].

HIV prevention interventions in Iran include the treatment of HIV and diverse sexual and injection harm reduction programs catered towards key populations. HIV testing is available through voluntary testing and counseling centers, drop in centers (DIC), and recently via established but limited number of mobile clinics. Needle/syringe exchanges, opioid substitution therapy, and substance use treatment are provided to PWID. Condom promotion and distribution, sexually transmitted infection (STI) treatment and reproductive health education are available for FSW as well as other key populations [8, 11, 12]. To assess the impact of these prevention interventions among targeted key populations, Iran has conducted several Integrated Bio-Behavioral Surveillance (IBBS) surveys among FSW (2010, 2015), prisoners (2009, and 2013) and PWID (2010, 2014). While these cross-sectional surveys provide estimates of HIV prevalence, the more useful and direct indicator to measure the impact of HIV prevention and treatment programs is HIV incidence.

Measuring the HIV incidence in settings with concentrated epidemic like Iran is challenging as the traditional way of measuring incidence, i.e. prospective cohort studies [13], are expensive, time-consuming, and not nationally representative. While laboratory-based incidence assays [1416] have improved over the past decade, they require representative samples and complicated algorithm to provide a reliable estimate of the HIV incidence at national levels in settings with concentrated epidemics. Moreover, mathematical modeling methods [17] aimed at calculating the HIV incidence require reliable local input parameters which are often unavailable [18].

In this paper, we used a practical method developed by Osmond et al. [19] to estimate the HIV incidence from several national IBBS cross-sectional surveys. We estimated overall and subgroup HIV incidence rate per 1,000 person-years among FSW, PWID, and prisoners using the time since their first sex or injection practice. We also assessed the temporal trends between survey rounds and characterized risk factors associated with higher or lower HIV incidence.

Methods

We used cross-sectional IBBS surveys data to approximate the incidence of HIV among FSW (2010, 2015), PWID (2010, 2014) and prisoners (2009, 2013) in Iran. In each survey, data were collected on demographics and HIV risk behaviors using face-to-face interview-based questionnaires. To reduce the chance of sensitive data leakage and improve data confidentiality, participants provided verbal consents for the interview and HIV testing. After the interview, if consenting separately, participants were also tested for HIV. In both rounds of FSW and PWID surveys, participants were recruited from facilities (DICs and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) targeting PWID or FSW, counseling centers for vulnerable women, and outreach services targeting FSW or PWID). For the survey among prisoners, we used a multistage cluster random sampling method to recruit eligible participants. All FSW and PWID surveys’ protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by Kerman University of Medical Sciences IRB Committee before implementation. In both prisoners’ survey, no money or any privileges were given as that may be coercive. In addition to Kerman University of Medical Sciences IRB approval, the Iran Prisons Organization (a prisoner advocacy group) also reviewed and approved the protocols and procedures for the surveys among prisoners. The verbal consent procedure was approved by the ethics committees. To avoid only record linking the subject and the research and keep the study fully anonymous, verbal consent was collected and the research staff signed the consent agreement on behalf of the participants. The research stuff explained to the participants in simple language the aims, risk and benefits of participating in the survey. Upon their verbal agreement, the interview was conducted and blood samples were collected for HIV testing.

FSW surveys

In the first round of FSW IBBS (2010), we recruited 872 FSW (93.7% consented and provided blood for HIV testing) from 13 cities. Details of survey methods have been presented elsewhere[5]. HIV was tested by ELISA test on two different dried blood samples and those tested positive with both tests were considered as HIV-positive. In the second round (2015), we recruited 1,372 FSW (1339; 97.6% consented and provided blood for HIV testing) from the same 13 cities [4]. In this round, we used two serial rapid tests (Alere and Unigold) to diagnose HIV. We also asked participants about their previous HIV test results and replaced the date of first HIV-positive test with the self-reported date. In FSW survey 2015, the inclusion criteria were a) 18 years or older, b) having penetrative sexual contact (vaginal or anal) for money, drugs, goods or any other favor in last 12 months with more than one man, and c) having Iranian nationality. In FSW survey 2010, we had an additional criterion as d) a history of practicing sex work for at least 6 months.

PWID surveys

The first round of PWID IBBS recruited 2480 (2418 men and 62 women) participants from 10 cities in 2010, 2,417 (97.5%) of whom consented and provided blood for HIV testing. Details of the study have been published elsewhere[3]. In PWID IBBS 2014, we recruited 2,491 (2,333 men and 58 women) from the same ten cities. Overall, 2,307 (96.1%) agreed and provided blood for HIV testing [2]. In both rounds, HIV was tested by ELISA tests on two different dried blood samples. Both PWID surveys had similar inclusion criteria: a) 18 year or older, b) self-reported drug injection in previous 12 months before the interview, and c) having Iranian nationality.

Prisoner surveys

The first round of prisoners IBBS recruited 5,530 participants from 27 prisons between May and July 2009, of whom 4,536 (82.0%) consented and provided blood for HIV testing. Details of the study have been published elsewhere[6]. In the second round of the survey (2013), 5,511 prisoners were recruited, 5,390 (97.8%) of whom agreed and provided blood for HIV testing [7]. In both rounds, HIV was tested by ELISA tests on two different dried blood samples. Those tested positive with both tests were considered as HIV-positive. Similar eligibility criteria were used for the two rounds: a) 18 year or older, b) be in prison at least one week before the interview, and c) having Iranian nationality.

Statistical analysis

We used the age of first sex or drug injection practice (whatever was earlier) as the starting point for the ‘time at risk’ period and the age at the time of interview (or age at first HIV-positive test in FSW IBBS 2015) as the last time point for being at risk. For those who tested HIV positive, we assumed that they have been infected at the mid-point of their time at risk. All participants with HIV-negative result were censored at the time of interview. We calculated the HIV incidence using the method of Osmond et al. [1921].

The point and 95% confidence intervals for the HIV incidence rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival function. We calculated the overall and subgroup HIV incidence rate in all surveys and assessed the differences (temporal trends) in HIV incidence rate between the two rounds using Log-Rank test in Stata v. 14.

We imputed the age at first sex in 2013 prisoner survey as it was not measured directly. We merged the two prisoners’ surveys (2009 and 2013) datasets and ran a multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) procedure to impute the age at first sex for all records in 2013. The factors that we used in the imputation model included age at the time of interview, sex, marital status, education, occupation before incarceration, history of drug use, history of drug injection, and age at first drug use.

Results

Overall HIV incidence rates

The overall incidence of HIV among FSW decreased from 2.38 (95% CI 1.66, 3.40) per 1,000 person years (PY) from 2010 to 1.12 (95% CI 0.77, 1.64) in 2015 (p-value = 0.003) (Fig 1). HIV incidence also decreased in PWID from 17.07 (95% CI 15.34, 19.34) per 1,000 PY in 2009 to 5.39 (95% CI 4.71, 6.16 in 2014 (p-value<0.001). In contrast, HIV incidence among prisoners also decreased from 1.34 (95% CI 1.08, 1.67) per 1,000 PY in 2009 to 0.49 (95% CI 0.39, 0.61) in 2013 (p-value<0.001) (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Estimated HIV incidence rate per 1,000 person years among female sex workers (FSW), people who inject drugs (PWID) and prisoners, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207681.g001

HIV incidence correlates and temporal trends in FSW

Among FSW, HIV incidence measured in the 2010 data was significantly higher for those who reported a history of drug injection (4.72 vs. 1.81 per 1,000 PY, p-value 0.001, Table 1). The same increased HIV incidence was also seen in the 2015 data (4.11 vs. 1.10 per 1,000 PY, p-value 0.001), along with an association with any drug use (1.43 vs. 0.58 per 1,000 PY, p-value 0.04) and also alcohol use (1.59 vs. 0.50 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.01). As seen in Table 1, no other significant correlates were significantly associated with elevated HIV incidence among FSW in both FSW surveys. However, HIV incidence decreased in nearly all subgroups of FSW defined by demographic characteristics and risk behaviors.

thumbnail
Table 1. Incidence of HIV per 1,000 person-years (PY), female sex workers, Iran, 2010 and 2015.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207681.t001

HIV incidence correlates and temporal trends in PWID

As measured in the 2010 survey wave, HIV incidence was significantly higher among younger PWID (24.08 vs. 12.98 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.002) and PWID with a history of incarceration (18.68 vs. 9.15 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001) (Table 2). In 2014, HIV incidence was significantly higher among female PWID (16.47 vs. 5.15 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), currently single PWID (6.37 vs. 1.78 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), those with no history of any sex (24.27 vs. 3.56 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), PWID with a history of STI in last year (6.99 vs. 1.08 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.001), and those with no history of alcohol use (9.76 vs. 4.12 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001). HIV incidence decreased significantly since 2010 in all sub-groups except in females, PWID who started injection at a younger age, and those with no history of sexual contact.

thumbnail
Table 2. Incidence of HIV per 1,000 person-years (PY), people who inject drugs, Iran, 2009 and 2014.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207681.t002

HIV incidence correlates and temporal trends in prisoners

In 2009, HIV incidence was significantly higher among younger prisoners (2.06 vs. 0.86 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.01), male prisoners (1.37 vs. 0.81 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.01), prisoners with a previous history of incarceration (1.77 vs. 0.81 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.003, those reporting not having sex (18.79 vs. 1.20 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.0001), married prisoners (2.76 vs. 0.64 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), those with a history of drug use (1.63 vs. 0.30 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), those who started drug use at a younger age (3.01 vs. 1.45 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.026), prisoners reporting drug injection (4.66 vs. 0.65 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), those who started injection at a younger age (14.62 vs. 4.47 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.006), and prisoners with a tattoo (2.26 vs.0.60 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.0001) (Table 3). In 2013, the HIV incidence was significantly higher among less educated prisoners (0.67 vs 0.49 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.001), those with the previous incarceration history (0.65 vs 0.20 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), those with no history of sex (0.97 vs 0.43 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.02), married prisoners (0.84 vs 0.22 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001), male with a history of same sex behavior (0.95 vs 0.38 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.006), those with a history of alcohol drinking (0.58 vs 0.23 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.01), those started drug use before 15 (1.03 vs 0.45 per 1,000 PY, p-value = 0.009), those with a history of injection (1.69 vs 0.19 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001) and those with a history of tattoo (0.76 vs 0.23 per 1,000 PY, p-value<0.001). HIV incidence decreased significantly from 2009 to 2013 in nearly all demographic and risk subgroups examined, with the exception that no significant change was seen among female prisoners, those started sexual activity before 15, those with a history of STI in last year and those with no history of drug use.

thumbnail
Table 3. Incidence of HIV per 1,000 person-years (PY), prisoners, Iran, 2009 and 2013.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207681.t003

Discussion

Our findings suggest that HIV incidence has substantially decreased in FSW, PWID and prisoner population in Iran. As a practical approach to approximating incidence rates, our study is the first to assess the magnitude and trends in HIV incidence in three key populations at risk in Iran. The PWID had the highest estimated rate of HIV incidence. We further found that among the FSW and prisoners in our surveys, those with a history of drug injection also had the highest incidence. Identifying injection as the major mode of HIV transmission is also supported by the proportion of national HIV reported cases that could be likely from high-risk injection (67.2% in 2015) [8] and also a recent modeling exercise [8, 22].

Previous studies that estimated HIV incidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys were conducted in African countries with generalized epidemics using household surveys and not particularly assessed HIV incidence among FSW [23, 24]. To the best our knowledge, no study from countries in Middle East and North Africa measured the incidence of HIV among key populations. One study in China, a country with a concentrated epidemic, estimated the HIV incidence as 0.3, 0.6, <0.01 and 0.1 per 1000 persons from 2011 to 2014, respectively [25], slightly lower than our estimates of HIV incidence. In a multisite cohort study of FSW in the Caribbean where HIV prevalence in adults was about 1.0% and 6.1% among adults and FSW, respectively [17] the HIV incidence among FSW was estimated as 0.50% (95% CI 0.06 to 1.81) in the Dominican Republic and 0.39% (95% CI 0.01 to 2.19) in Puerto Rico [13]. As expected, our estimates are in range of previous studies but overall lower than such HIV incidence estimates as in most Caribbean countries where the main modes of transmission is heterosexual and transactional sex. Our estimates are much closer to estimates for FSW in Puerto Rico, where unsafe injection also contributed significantly to the spread of HIV [26].

In PWID, the incidence was lower than the US and higher than Russian PWID. In the US, HIV among PWID in 22 states was estimated as 22.8 per 100,000 person-years [27]. In a cohort study in St Petersburg, Russia, the incidence of infection was estimated as 4.5 per 100 person-years [28]. Moreover, HIV incidence among prisoners in Rhode Island was estimated as 0% [29].

The reduction in the HIV incidence rate among these populations could possibly be explained by expanding the prevention interventions (e.g., increasing number of harm reduction centers for vulnerable women and PWID, scaling up free harm reduction services such as HIV rapid testing services and increasing coverage of Syringe and Needle Program (NSP) among FSW and PWID [9, 18, 3033]. Since 1999, the number of health centers that provided opioid substitution (OST) therapy has been increased to 700 in 2007 in Iran. Between 2007 and 2009, the number of OST centers were further increased to 1,600 centers with more than 432,000 patients receiving such services. As reported by 2014, there are 3,373 centers offering OST services. Clearly, this highly accessible and coverage of OST nationwide may contribute to the observed reduction of HIV incidence in Iran [34].

In a mathematical modeling study of HIV transmission among PWID in Kermanshah, Iran [12], the incidence rate of HIV was estimated as 1.02% in PWID with sufficient coverage of NSP, and 4.04% in PWID without sufficient coverage of NSP. The reduction in HIV incidence could be due to ongoing nationwide harm reduction program focused on unsafe injection and its associated harms in place since 2002 [35]. Findings from annual prisoners’ sentinel surveillance between 1999 to 2011 [36] indicated a peak between 2001 to 2005 (about 3%) followed by a gradual decrease to 1.28% in 2011. The reduction in HIV was highly correlated with the coverage of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and triangular clinics that provided HIV and STI testing and treatment services to prisoners [36]. Interestingly, we found HIV incidence was significantly higher among prisoners and PWID without a history of sex compared to those who reported lifetime sexual contact. Both marriage and having other type of sexual partners require some sort of good health, economic status and accepted social and educational level. Prisoners and PWID who do not have such requirements not only are less likely to have sexual partners but also at higher risk for HIV [37, 38].

The higher incidence of HIV among younger populations could also be explained by a higher frequency of engaging in high-risk sexual acts such as multiple partnerships, unprotected sex, alcohol use, or unsafe drug injections with multiple injecting partners [9, 10, 31]. Although we could fully assess the age effect, it maybe the effect of risk networks and mixtures; people in younger age groups may have contacts with those in older groups who had a higher HIV prevalence; and so, people in younger groups have more risk of acquiring the HIV infection [3941]. It could also be an artifact as a result of the way we defined the time at risk. Basically, in younger age groups, we shorten the time at risk since first sex or injection and so with the same number of infected cases, the rate would be higher as the denominator will become smaller. This is one of the limitations to the method used [19] which needs to be considered when interpreting the findings.

We acknowledge additional limitations of this study’s method to approximate HIV incidence. We estimated incidence in cross-sectional surveys using the approach outlined by Osmond et al. [19] which calculates person-time at risk since first sex or injection by recall. First, participants may not recall or report the accurate data of first sex or injection. Second, we assumed people remained at risk for HIV after their first sex or injection and did not exclude periods of stopping sexual activity or injection or practicing safe sex or safe injection. Third, the exact date of seroconversion is censored at some time between the true (but unknown) date of sex or injection initiation and the first time they tested for HIV. For our study populations, testing rates are low [9, 31, 42], and the survey itself may be the first test. To partly reduce the effect of such bias, we used the midpoint of time at risk as the time of seroconversion in our analysis. Moreover, the approximated exposure period cannot establish cause before effect, which is the major strength of longitudinally measured HIV incidence.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that after an increase in the 2000s, HIV transmission may have decreased and stabilized among PWID, FSW and prisoner populations in Iran. This reduction can be attributed to the nationwide expansion of OST and harm reduction services. However, still injection continues to be the main driver of HIV transmission in Iran. Adding other prevention strategies like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), strategies to improve early HIV diagnosis, timely identification of HIV transmission clusters by using recency HIV testing options, and using the test and treat strategy to reduce the individual- and population-level viral load may further contribute to the epidemic control and reaching the 90-90-90 targets by 2020.

Acknowledgments

Work is to be attributed to HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

References

  1. 1. Gokengin D, Doroudi F, Tohme J, Collins B, Madani N. HIV/AIDS: trends in the Middle East and North Africa region. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2016;44:66–73. Epub 2016/03/08. pmid:26948920.
  2. 2. Haghdoost AA, Danesh A, Sharifi H, Shokoohi M, Khajehkazemi R, Mirzazadeh A, et al. HIV Bio-Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BBSS) among People Who Inject Drugs, I. R. Iran in 2014: Project Report [In Persian]. Tehran: HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIv Surveillance, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran 2014.
  3. 3. Khajehkazemi R, Osooli M, Sajadi L, Karamouzian M, Sedaghat A, Fahimfar N, et al. HIV prevalence and risk behaviours among people who inject drugs in Iran: the 2010 National Surveillance Survey. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:sextrans-2013-051204.
  4. 4. Mirzazadeh A, Shokouhi M, Sharifi H, Khajehkazemi R, Hosseini-Hooshyar S, Karamouzian M, et al. HIV Bio-Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BBSS) among FSW, I. R. Iran in 2015: Project Report [In Persian]. Tehran: HIV/STI Surveillance research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran, 2015.
  5. 5. Sajadi L, Mirzazadeh A, Navadeh S, Osooli M, Khajehkazemi R, Gouya MM, et al. HIV prevalence and related risk behaviours among female sex workers in Iran: results of the national biobehavioural survey, 2010. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 3):iii37–iii40.
  6. 6. Navadeh S, Mirzazadeh A, Gouya MM, Farnia M, Alasvand R, Haghdoost AA. HIV prevalence and related risk behaviours among prisoners in Iran: results of the national biobehavioural survey, 2009. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 3):iii33–iii6.
  7. 7. Haghdoost AA, Danesh A, Sharifi H. HIV Bio-Behavioral Surveillance Survey (BBSS) among Prisoners, I. R. Iran in 2013: Project Report [In Persian]. Tehran: HIV/STI Surveillance Reseach Center, and WHO Collaborating for HIV Surveillance, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran 2013.
  8. 8. National AIDS Committee Secretariat. Islamic Republic of Iran AIDS Progress Report. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. Tehran: 2015.
  9. 9. Shokoohi M, Karamouzian M, Khajekazemi R, Osooli M, Sharifi H, Haghdoost AA, et al. Correlates of HIV Testing among Female Sex Workers in Iran: Findings of a National Bio-Behavioural Surveillance Survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147587. pmid:26807584
  10. 10. Sharifi H, Shokoohi M, Ahmad RafieiRad A, Sargolzaie Moghadam M, Haghdoost AA, Mirzazadeh A, et al. Methamphetamine Use among Iranian Youth: A Population-based Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice study. Substance Use & Misuse. 2017;52(9):1232–9. pmid:28605272
  11. 11. Nazari SSH, Noroozi M, Soori H, Noroozi A, Mehrabi Y, Hajebi A, et al. The effect of on-site and outreach-based needle and syringe programs in people who inject drugs in Kermanshah, Iran. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;27:127–31. pmid:26764125
  12. 12. Noroozi M, Noroozi A, Mirzazadeh A, Hajebi A, Mehrabi Y, Hashemi SS, et al. Impact of Needle and Syringe Program Coverage on HIV Incidence in People Who Inject Drugs. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2017;6(1):e28929. Epub 2016-09-26.
  13. 13. Deschamps MM, Metch B, Morgan CA, Zorilla CD, Donastorg Y, Swann E, et al. Feasibility of Identifying a Female Sex Worker Cohort at High Risk of HIV Infection in the Caribbean for HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials: Longitudinal Results of HVTN 907. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2016;71(1):70–7. Epub 2016/01/14. pmid:26761272; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4712715.
  14. 14. Duong YT, Qiu M, De AK, Jackson K, Dobbs T, Kim AA, et al. Detection of recent HIV-1 infection using a new limiting-antigen avidity assay: potential for HIV-1 incidence estimates and avidity maturation studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33328. Epub 2012/04/06. pmid:22479384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3314002.
  15. 15. Gao Z, Yan H, Feng X, Wu L, Qiu M, Xing W, et al. Development of a New Limiting-Antigen Avidity Dot Immuno-Gold Filtration Assay for HIV-1 Incidence. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161183. Epub 2016/08/12. pmid:27513563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4981313.
  16. 16. Kim AA, McDougal JS, Hargrove J, Rehle T, Pillay-Van Wyk V, Puren A, et al. Evaluating the BED capture enzyme immunoassay to estimate HIV incidence among adults in three countries in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS research and human retroviruses. 2010;26(10):1051–61. Epub 2010/09/21. pmid:20849299.
  17. 17. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. The gap report 2014. Available from: http://files.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2014/UNAIDS_Gap_report_en.pdf.
  18. 18. Karamouzian M, Madani N, Doroudi F, Haghdoost AA. Improving the quality and quantity of HIV Data in the Middle East and North Africa: key challenges and ways forward. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(2):65–9.
  19. 19. Osmond DH, Page K, Wiley J, Garrett K, Sheppard HW, Moss AR, et al. HIV infection in homosexual and bisexual men 18 to 29 years of age: the San Francisco Young Men's Health Study. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(12):1933–7. pmid:7998633
  20. 20. Van Griensven F. Estimating recent HIV incidence among young men who have sex with men: Reinvigorating, validating and implementing Osmond’s algorithm for behavioral imputation. Nonthaburi (Thailand);Global Fund Principal Recipient Administrative Office, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. 2016.
  21. 21. Van Griensven F, Varangrat A, Wimonsate W, Tanpradech S, Kladsawad K, Chemnasiri T, et al. Trends in HIV Prevalence, Estimated HIV Incidence, and Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Bangkok, Thailand, 2003–2007. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010;53(2):234–9. 00126334-201002010-00012. pmid:19901844
  22. 22. Haghdoost AA, Mostafavi E, Mirzazadeh A, Navadeh S, Feizzadeh A, Fahimfar N, et al. Modelling of HIV/AIDS in Iran up to 2014. J AIDS HIV Res. 2011;3(12):231–9.
  23. 23. Hallett TB, Stover J, Mishra V, Ghys PD, Gregson S, Boerma T. Estimates of HIV incidence from household-based prevalence surveys. AIDS (London, England). 2010;24(1):147–52. Epub 2009/11/17. pmid:19915447; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3535828.
  24. 24. Rehle TM, Hallett TB, Shisana O, Pillay-van Wyk V, Zuma K, Carrara H, et al. A decline in new HIV infections in South Africa: estimating HIV incidence from three national HIV surveys in 2002, 2005 and 2008. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e11094. Epub 2010/06/19. pmid:20559425; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2885415.
  25. 25. Cui Y, Guo W, Li D, Wang L, Shi CX, Brookmeyer R, et al. Estimating HIV incidence among key affected populations in China from serial cross-sectional surveys in 2010–2014. J Int AIDS Soc. 2016;19(1).
  26. 26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2015; Vol. 27. Published November 2016. Accessed 06/13/2017. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance.html.
  27. 27. Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, Prejean J, An Q, Lee LM, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(5):520–9. pmid:18677024
  28. 28. Kozlov AP, Shaboltas AV, Toussova OV, Verevochkin SV, Masse BR, Perdue T, et al. HIV incidence and factors associated with HIV acquisition among injection drug users in St Petersburg, Russia. AIDS (London, England). 2006;20(6):901–6.
  29. 29. Macalino GE, Vlahov D, Sanford-Colby S, Patel S, Sabin K, Salas C, et al. Prevalence and incidence of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infections among males in Rhode Island prisons. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(7):1218–23. pmid:15226146
  30. 30. Karamouzian M, Mirzazadeh A, Rawat A, Shokoohi M, Haghdoost AA, Sedaghat A, et al. Injection drug use among female sex workers in Iran: Findings from a nationwide bio-behavioural survey. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;44:86–91. pmid:28478309
  31. 31. Shokoohi M, Karamouzian M, Osooli M, Sharifi H, Fahimfar N, Haghdoost A, et al. Low HIV testing rate and its correlates among men who inject drugs in Iran. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;32:64–9. pmid:27157980
  32. 32. Alam-Mehrjerdi Z, Daneshmand R, Samiei M, Samadi R, Abdollahi M, Dolan K. Women-only drug treatment services and needs in Iran: the first review of current literature. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2016;24(1):3.
  33. 33. Mumtaz GR, Weiss HA, Thomas SL, Riome S, Setayesh H, Riedner G, et al. HIV among people who inject drugs in the Middle East and North Africa: systematic review and data synthesis. PLoS Med. 2014;11(6):e1001663. pmid:24937136
  34. 34. Alam-mehrjerdi Z, Abdollahi M, Higgs P, Dolan K. Drug use treatment and harm reduction programs in Iran: A unique model of health in the most populated Persian Gulf country. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2015;16:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2015.06.002. pmid:26168763
  35. 35. Nissaramanesh B, Trace M, Roberts M. The rise of harm reduction in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Briefing Paper 8. Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Programme 2005. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.536.6168&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  36. 36. Shahbazi M, Farnia M, Rahmani K, Moradi G. Trend of HIV/AIDS Prevalence and Related Interventions Administered in Prisons of Iran -13 Years' Experience. Iranian journal of public health. 2014;43(4):471–9. Epub 2015/05/26. pmid:26005657; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4433728.
  37. 37. Gillespie S, Kadiyala S, Greener R. Is poverty or wealth driving HIV transmission? AIDS (London, England). 2007;21:S5–S16. 00002030-200711007-00002. pmid:18040165
  38. 38. Strathdee SA, Galai N, Safaiean M, Celentano DD, David Vlahov D, Johnson L, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users: A 10-year perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001;161(10):1281–8. pmid:11371255
  39. 39. Pettifor AE, van der Straten A, Dunbar MS, Shiboski SC, Padian NS. Early age of first sex: a risk factor for HIV infection among women in Zimbabwe. AIDS (London, England). 2004;18(10):1435–42. 00002030-200407020-00010.
  40. 40. Sarkar K, Bal B, Mukherjee R, Saha MK, Chakraborty S, Niyogi SK, et al. Young age is a risk factor for HIV among female sex workers—An experience from India. Journal of Infection. 2006;53(4):255–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2005.11.009. pmid:16386307
  41. 41. Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. The Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1397–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04562-1.
  42. 42. Shokoohi M, Noori A, Karamouzian M, Sharifi H, Khajehkazemi R, Fahimfar N, et al. Remaining Gap in HIV Testing Uptake Among Female Sex Workers in Iran. AIDS Behav. 2017;21:2401–11. pmid:28688031