Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA) accumulates in GIST-T1 cells and photodynamic diagnosis using 5-ALA identifies gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in xenograft tumor models

  • Makiko Sasaki,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Mamoru Tanaka ,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    mtanaka@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Hiroshi Ichikawa,

    Roles Investigation, Software

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Taketo Suzuki,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Software

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Hirotada Nishie,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Keiji Ozeki,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Takaya Shimura,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Eiji Kubota,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Satoshi Tanida,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯
  • Hiromi Kataoka

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Science, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    ⨯

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) diagnosis using conventional gastrointestinal endoscopy is difficult because such malignancies cannot be distinguished from other types of submucosal tumors. Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) is based on the preferential uptake of photosensitizers by tumor tissues and its detection by fluorescence emission upon laser excitation. In this study, we investigated whether PDD using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), a standard photosensitizer used worldwide, could be used for GIST diagnosis. 5-ALA is metabolized to endogenous fluorescent protoporphyrin IX (PpIX). We examined the accumulation of PpIX in GIST-T1 cells using flow cytometry and immunofluorescent staining. Furthermore, we established GIST-T1 xenograft mouse models and examined PpIX accumulation in the resultant tumors. PpIX accumulated in GIST-T1 cells and was localized mainly to lysosomes. PpIX accumulation was also observed in murine xenograft tumors. Moreover, tumor and normal tissues could be distinctly identified by relative PpIX fluorescence. Thus, our results demonstrated that PDD with 5-ALA has substantial clinical potential for GIST diagnosis.

Citation: Sasaki M, Tanaka M, Ichikawa H, Suzuki T, Nishie H, Ozeki K, et al. (2021) 5-aminolaevulinic acid (5-ALA) accumulates in GIST-T1 cells and photodynamic diagnosis using 5-ALA identifies gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in xenograft tumor models. PLoS ONE 16(4): e0249650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650

Editor: Michael R. Hamblin, Massachusetts General Hospital, UNITED STATES

Received: October 13, 2020; Accepted: March 23, 2021; Published: April 7, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Sasaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (2017-2019) (grant number 18K08013) (to M. Tanaka); JSPS KAKENHI (2020-2022) (grant number 20K08361) (to M. Tanaka); Takeda Science Foundation (2018-2019) (to M. Tanaka); Kobayashi International Scholarship Foundation (2019) (to M. Tanaka); The Nitto Foundation (2019) (to M. Tanaka); The Murata Science Foundation (2019-2020) (to M. Tanaka); Research Foundation for Opto Science and Technology (2020) (to M. Tanaka); JSPS KAKENHI (2020-2021) grant number 20K16965 (to H. Ichikawa); JSPS KAKENHI (2020-2021) (grant number 20K16997) (to T. Suzuki); JSPS KAKENHI (2018-2020) (grant number 18K15758) (to H. Nishie); JSPS KAKENHI (2020-2022) (grant number 20K083919) (to H. Kataoka). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: NO authors have competing interests

Introduction

GISTs are the most common submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the gastrointestinal tract observed in clinical practice, with a population prevalence of 14–20 cases per million [1, 2]. GISTs can occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal system, with 50%–60% located in the stomach, 30%–35% in the small intestine, 5% in the colon and rectum, and < 1% in the esophagus [3]. If the GIST is localized, the 5-year survival rate is 94%; when spread locally, this becomes 82%, and if the GIST exhibits distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate is 52% [4]. SMTs are derived from mesenchymal cells, and because of this, SMTs are generally enveloped by normal mucosa, which makes it difficult to differentially diagnose GISTs from other types of SMTs using conventional endoscopy. At present, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been developed, which enables pathological diagnosis of SMTs, including GISTs [5]. However, such diagnosis requires advanced technical skills that are limited to expert endoscopists. Additionally, performing EUS-FNA targeting small SMTs < 2 cm in diameter is especially difficult. GISTs occur anywhere along the gastrointestinal system and have malignant potential. Moreover, no effective treatment strategies, except for surgical resection, are currently available for GISTs. Hence, the present situation of diagnosis and treatment of GISTs is challenging.

Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), wherein tumor and normal tissues are identified by characteristically different fluorescent wavelengths, has been demonstrated to be an effective diagnostic technique for certain types of tumors, and is widely used in clinical applications [6]. PDD is based on the preferential uptake of photosensitizers by tumor tissues and its detection by fluorescence emission upon laser excitation to distinguish tumors from normal tissue. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), a standard photosensitizer used in PDD, is a naturally occurring amino acid that has been widely used in clinical applications owing to its specificity toward some tumors and its demonstrated safety [7–11]. In Japan, 5-ALA PDD has been approved for health insurance coverage in cases of brain tumors (in particular, malignant glioma) and bladder tumors. 5-ALA is synthesized from glycine and succinyl-CoA by the enzyme 5-ALA synthase, which is dependent on vitamin B6 in mitochondria. 5-ALA is not itself fluorescent; however, it is a metabolic precursor in the heme biosynthetic pathway, and is further metabolized into endogenous fluorescent protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) (Fig 1) [12, 13]. PpIX emits red fluorescence between 600 and 740 nm when irradiated with 375–445 nm laser illumination [14–16]. This conversion of 5-ALA to its active compound PpIX in tissues has been used for PDD in many clinical applications, particularly because it substantially accumulates in tumor cells rather than in normal cells [7–9, 17, 18]. The reasons why PpIX accumulates much more in cancer cells than in normal cells are unclear, but two major hypotheses have been proposed: (1) PpIX accumulates in cancer cells because of a decrease in ferrochelatase activity; (2) 5-ALA has a high affinity for cancer cells [12, 19, 20].

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Schematic illustration of PpIX-metabolizing pathway and mechanism of PDD.

5-ALA is a metabolic precursor of heme in the heme synthesis pathway and is further metabolized into PpIX. PpIX emits red fluorescence (600–740 nm) when excited with blue-violet light (375–445 nm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.g001

To the best of our knowledge, many reports have been published regarding the accumulation of PpIX in different types of human cancer cell lines [21–36], but PDD of GISTs using 5-ALA has not yet been reported. In a similar study concerning PDD, Fujimoto et al. reported that molecular fluorescent imaging using a near-infrared (NIR) photosensitizer conjugated anti c-kit antibody was able to detect GISTs, making NIR irradiation a very efficacious theranostic (a newly coined term combining “therapeutics” and “diagnosis”) technology for GIST [37]. We previously demonstrated the antitumor effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in GIST using glucose-conjugated chlorin [38, 39]; however, PDD of GIST using 5-ALA has not been reported to date. Therefore, we investigated whether PDD with 5-ALA could be used for GIST detection as this could have therapeutic potential in combination with glucose-conjugated chlorin. Here, we show that PDD with 5-ALA has clinical potential for GIST diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations and guidelines of the Nagoya City University for Animal Experiments. The protocol was approved by the Committee of Laboratory Animal Facility at Nagoya City University for Experimental Animal Science under permit number 19–024. All experiments involving animals were performed under anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Photosensitizer

5-ALA was obtained from Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) and dissolved in 0.9% normal saline at a concentration of 720 mmol/L. For the in vitro studies, 5-ALA was diluted in cell culture medium.

Cell line and culture methods

The human GIST cell line GIST-T1 (code number: GIST01, Cosmo Bio Co.) was purchased in 2014. In addition to negative test results for mycoplasma contamination, cell line authentication and characterization were performed by Cosmo Bio Co. The International Council for Laboratory Animal Science (ICLAS) Monitoring Center, Central Institute for Experimental Animals, tested the cell line for the presence of viruses, with negative results. All experiments using cells in this study were performed for less than 20 passages. GIST-T1 cells were cultured in high glucose (4500 mg/L) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Biosera, Nuaillé, France) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B suspension (Wako Pure Chemical Industries) under 5% CO2 and at 37°C.

Flow cytometric analysis

GIST-T1 cells were resuspended in 6-cm culture dishes at a density of 1 × 106 cells/well in culture medium and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Following this, the medium was replaced with fresh medium supplemented with 0.89 mmol/L 5-ALA added to the dishes for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min to evaluate the accumulation of photosensitizer in cells. After washing the cells with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times, cells were removed from the culture dish after trypsin-EDTA treatment for analysis using a flow cytometer with excitation at 405 nm and emission at 680 nm. All flow cytometric examinations were performed on a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), and 10,000 events were counted and analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).

Subcellular localization of 5-ALA

GIST-T1 cells were seeded into 8-well chamber plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Subsequently, 5-ALA was added to the culture media to a final concentration of 8 mmol/L, and the cells were further incubated for 2 h for staining with organelle-specific fluorescent probes. Lysosomes were stained with 0.1 μmol/L LysoTracker Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 30 min, mitochondria with 0.1 μmol/L MitoTracker Green FM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 10 min, Golgi with 5 μmol/L NBD C6-ceramide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4°C on ice for 30 min, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with 0.1 μmol/L ER-Tracker Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 30 min. After incubation under each condition, the culture media were replaced with fresh media to remove free dyes. Stained cells were directly examined for accumulation in mitochondria, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for accumulation identification in lysosomes, Golgi, and ER. Intracellular localization was visualized using a confocal laser microscope (FV3000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and cellSens imaging software (Olympus). Band-pass emission filters of 500–540 nm and 488 nm for organelle-specific fluorescent probes, and 570–670 nm and 561 nm for PpIX were used. We measured the fluorescence intensity profiles. Arrows in micrographs showed the direction of scanning, and the histograms showed the strength of the fluorescent signals for evaluation of the peaks and trends of each luminescence. Co-localization was measured the whole each image, and the average values were calculated. Fluorescence intensity profiles were examined via confocal imaging, and quantitative analysis was performed using cellSens imaging software. Data from three independent experiments are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test and was set at P < 0.01.

Animal models

Our experiments used murine animal models involving pathogen-free female nude mice (BALB/c Slc-nu/nu), 6–8 weeks of age, with a body weight of 18–22 g, which were purchased from Shizuoka Laboratory Animal Center (Shizuoka, Japan). Fifty mice were used in this study, including in preliminary experiments. Mice were kept under pathogen-free conditions under controlled temperature and humidity, 12 h light and 12 h dark cycle conditions, and fed a sterilized pellet diet with water ad libitum. Before commencing any intervention, all mice were acclimatized for at least 2 weeks in our animal facility. The health of the mice was monitored, and tumor sizes were measured every 2 days. Tumor volumes were calculated using the following formula: volume (mm3) = length (mm) × width (mm) × height (mm) × 0.5. Animals found to be unhealthy (loss of ambulation, appetite, or weight) were promptly planned to be euthanized. In addition, any mouse with a tumor size of 1000 mm3 was designated to be euthanized. None of the mice were found to be unhealthy or died throughout this study. Cervical dislocation was used for euthanasia. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) reconstituted in physiological saline solution. Xenograft models of flank tumors were established by subcutaneously implanting 3.4 × 107 GIST-T1 cells in 200 μL of medium and equivalent amounts of Matrigel (Corning, New York, USA) under the flanks of mice. Xenograft models of peritoneal dissemination were established by implanting 2.5 × 107 GIST-T1 cells in 100 μL of medium into the abdominal cavity. PDD was performed after tumor size reached 100–300 mm3 in flank tumor models, and all mice were euthanized at the time of PDD.

In vivo PDD

In vivo PDD was started when tumor sizes reached 100–300 mm3 in flank tumor models 5 weeks after the injection of tumor cells. We considered three groups (n = 3) of flank tumor models as follows: a dose of 300 mg/kg 5-ALA was injected and PDD conducted after 4 h, 300 mg/kg and 7 h, and 600 mg/kg and 4 h. Peritoneal seeding models were intended to form peritoneal dissemination nodules around the same time as the flank tumor was established, and a dose of 300 mg/kg 5-ALA was injected via the tail vein. Mice were sacrificed after 4 and 7 h, in accordance with our institutional guidelines, followed by tumor extraction. Tumors were exposed to white light and LED illumination (420 nm). Images were captured using a high-resolution camera equipped with an optical filter (cut-off 470 nm, long band pass filter VIS 470 nm, (Asahi Spectra, Tokyo, Japan)).

Spectrophotometric analysis

We examined the accumulation of photosensitizers in murine xenograft tumors using a semiconductor laser with a VLD-M1 spectrometer (M&M, Tokyo, Japan) and its accessory software (BW-Spec V3. 24; B&W TEK, Inc., Newark, DE, USA). The spectrometer emitted laser light with a peak wavelength of 405 ± 1 nm and a light output of 140 mW. We used the manufacturer’s software to analyze spectral waveforms. The relative fluorescence intensity ratio in tumor and normal tissues was calculated by dividing the relative fluorescence intensity of PpIX (635 nm) by that of autofluorescence (505 nm) [38–41]. Following injection of 300 mg/kg 5-ALA in the xenograft flank tumor model animals after 4 h, the data—in view of the results of in vivo PDD—was obtained when conditions were optimal. Data from three independent experiments are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). Significance was calculated using Student’s t-test.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics and samples were analyzed using Prism software (v.6.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for quantitative analysis of subcellular localization of PpIX. Student’s t-test was performed for spectrometric analyses.

Results

PpIX accumulated in GIST-T1 cells

We examined the uptake of PpIX by GIST-T1 cells in vitro. We incubated cells with 0.89 mmol/L 5-ALA for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. Then, we measured the intensity of the characteristic red fluorescence at the single-cell level using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The accumulation of PpIX in GIST-T1 cells increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. PpIX accumulation in GIST-T1 cells in vitro.

GIST-T1 cells were loaded with PpIX for different durations. Accumulation of PpIX within cells was analyzed using FACS with excitation at 405 nm and emission at 680 nm. (A) Histogram data from FACS. The abscissa (X-axis) indicates intensity of emission and the ordinate (Y-axis) represents number of cells. The green and red histograms represent cell samples at 0 min (as a control) and cell samples at each indicated time point, respectively. (B) Temporal changes in mean fluorescence intensity (M.F.I.). The abscissa (X-axis) indicates time and the ordinate (Y-axis) of the graph represents M.F.I.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.g002

PpIX in GIST-T1 cells accumulates mainly in lysosomes

Accumulation and subcellular localization of PpIX were investigated using confocal microscopy employing fluorescent probes to specifically label intracellular organelles. Cells were loaded with 5-ALA and incubated with each organelle-specific fluorescent probe (MitoTracker Green, LysoTracker Green, NBD C6 ceramide Green, or ERTracker Green) to label mitochondria, lysosomes, Golgi, and ER, respectively. The corresponding detection of PpIX with LysoTracker indicated accumulation in lysosomes (Fig 3A). The fluorescence intensity profiles for PpIX detection exhibited a tendency to correlate with the lysosome tracking marker (Fig 3B), and quantitative analysis revealed that the percentage of subcellular localization of PpIX was significantly greater in lysosomes (P < 0.01).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Subcellular localization of PpIX.

GIST-T1 cells were loaded with 5-ALA (8 mmol/L) for 2 h and stained with MitoTracker Green, LysoTracker Green, NBD-C6 ceramide Green, or ER-Tracker Green. Intracellular localization was visualized by confocal microscopy (original magnification, × 350; scale bar, 5 μm). (A) Each row represents the fluorescence of the organelle-specific probes and PpIX, respectively. (B) The fluorescence intensity profiles of PpIX (red lines) and the organelle probes (green lines) were examined along the arrows in the confocal images. (C) Quantitative analysis of subcellular localization of PpIX. Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple comparison test and was set at **P < 0.01. The rate of concordance of PpIX levels to each organelle probe was significantly higher in lysosomes (P < 0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.g003

PDD with 5-ALA distinctly identifies GIST in vivo

We tested photosensitizer fluorescence in xenograft tumor mouse models. After the implanted tumors grew to 100–300 mm3 in flank tumor models, 5-ALA was administered to mice, and all mice were euthanized after several hours. The extracted tumors were exposed to white light and LED irradiation. Tumors treated with 5-ALA clearly emitted red fluorescence under 420 nm LED excitation. In the flank tumor models, the highest level of fluorescence was measured at a dose of 300 mg/kg 5-ALA for 4 h. In peritoneal seeding models, we could not identify peritoneal dissemination through the skin via LED light, but the extracted tumors emitted strong fluorescence (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Fluorescent imaging of GIST xenograft models.

Images were captured using a high-resolution camera equipped with an optical filter. Each image was photographed under white light (left side) and LED illumination (right side). (A) Xenograft models of flank tumors. Strong fluorescence was observed in mice receiving 300 mg/kg 5-ALA for 4 h. (B) Xenograft models of peritoneal seeding tumors. Peritoneal dissemination could not be identified through skin via LED light, but strong fluorescence was observed in extracted tumors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.g004

PpIX accumulation in xenograft tumors

We examined PpIX accumulation in xenograft tumors established by subcutaneous or intraperitoneal implantation of GIST-T1 cells. After intravenous injection (via the tail vein) of 5-ALA, the spectral waveforms of xenograft tumors were measured using a spectrometer (VLD-M1). Spectral waveform analysis revealed that a peak of fluorescence emission was observed at 635 nm, corresponding to PpIX (Fig 5). Generally, autofluorescence levels were centered around 505 nm. We then examined relative fluorescence intensity ratios (at 635/505 nm) of photosensitizers in tumors and normal tissues surrounding the tumors using a spectrometer. Data were obtained from three independent experiments in each group. The increase in the ratio demonstrated the significance of the difference in accumulation between normal skin and GIST (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 5. 5-ALA accumulation in GIST in vivo.

Flank tumor models were administered with 300 mg/kg 5-ALA via the tail vein. Four hours after 5-ALA administration, the spectral waveforms of normal skin tissue (blue line) and GIST (red line) were examined using a VLD-M1 spectrometer. A peak of fluorescence emission was observed at 635 nm, corresponding to PpIX.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.g005

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Autofluorescence in normal skin tissues and fluorescence intensity using 5-ALA in GIST.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.t001

Discussion

In this study, we observed excellent in vitro and in vivo accumulation and fluorescence using 5-ALA in GISTs. 5-ALA is a standard photosensitizer used worldwide for PDD [42]. Therefore, we investigated the potential of PDD in GIST by examining the in vitro and in vivo accumulation of PpIX, which is a metabolite of 5-ALA.

We observed that in vitro accumulation of PpIX was mainly localized to tumor cell lysosomes, which have been proposed to be critical for photosensitizer action [43]. Hamblin et al. reported that photosensitizers principally accumulate in endosomes and lysosomes, unless they are metabolized and released from lysosomes [44]. In several cancer cell types, the synthesis of PpIX is typically promoted by an increase in the activity of the β-transporter and porphobilinogen deaminase, whereas the metabolizing pathway of PpIX is inhibited by an increase in the activity of the transferrin receptor and a decrease in the activity of ferrochelatase (Fig 1). Moreover, the requirement for heme is low in cancer cells because such cells depend on glycolytic energy production (the so-called Warburg effect) [45]. As a result, PpIX accumulates in cancer cells [46, 47]. These reports confirm our result that PpIX accumulation in GIST-T1 cells was mainly localized to lysosomes. We previously synthesized and reported PDD using oligosaccharide-conjugated chlorin (O-chlorin) [48]. In our previous study, we confirmed that O-chlorin accumulated in MKN45 (a human gastric cancer cell line), and was mainly localized to lysosomes. In addition, another photosensitizer, hypericin, is reported to localize to the ER and lysosomes in HeLa cells [49]. Based on these reports, we consider that many photosensitizers used in the field of PDD tend to accumulate in lysosomes. On the contrary, certain photosensitizers used for PDT accumulate in various subcellular compartments, such as photolon accumulation in mitochondria, lysosomes, and Golgi apparatus [50], and photosensitizer I, which is a novel photosensitizer reported by Peng-Xi Li, accumulates in the mitochondria and ER of HeLa cells [51]. A recent study showed that the same photosensitizers exhibit different localizations in various cell lines [52]. Therefore, identification of photosensitizer localization requires further consideration.

Fluorescence emission was observed in murine xenograft tumors treated with 5-ALA. However, this emission was dependent on the time elapsed following 5-ALA administration, as well as its concentration. Higher doses of photosensitizer rendered the visual distinction of fluorescence emitted by the tumor and normal tissue difficult, thereby leading to incorrect PDD of SMTs. Similarly, clear fluorescence was observed only within a specific timeframe following 5-ALA administration. In previous studies, the optimal time to evaluate the fluorescence of 5-ALA in PDD was indicated to be 1–4 h [51, 53]. Although these studies involved different cell lines and routes of drug administration, they do not contradict our results.

Extensive research has been conducted concerning malignancies of the digestive tract, including gastric, esophageal, and colon cancers, among others. In Japan, peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer has been a major area of focus for the development of pharmaceutical agents. Laser-based photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric and colorectal cancers using 5-ALA has been reported, although the issue of fluorescent intensity differences among histopathological types has not yet been resolved [15, 54]. However, a recent study suggested that gastric cancer cell lines expressing high levels of ATP-binding cassette transporters tend to exhibit low levels of 5-ALA staining [55]. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of PDT with a novel glucose-conjugated photosensitizer, glycocon-conjugated chlorin (5, 10, 15, 20-tetrakis [4- [β-D-glucopyranosylthio- 2, 3, 5, 6-tetrafluorophenyl]-2, 3, [methano [N-methyl] iminomethano] chlorin, H2TFPC-SGlc) in GIST, both in vitro and in vivo [38]. Nevertheless, the GIST diagnostic approach presents a greater potential for improvement compared to conventional methods.

In summary, the accumulation of PpIX in GIST-T1 cells, specifically in lysosomes, as well as the photodynamic detection of PpIX in murine xenograft models, demonstrates a strong potential for PDD and clinical applications in the future.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Fluorescent imaging of murine GIST xenograft models.

Images were acquired using a high-resolution camera equipped with an optical filter. Each image was photographed under white (left side) and LED light illumination (right side). The remaining two mice of each group, except for those shown in Fig 4, are shown in this figure. Mice used during preliminary experiments under other conditions (600 mg/kg 5-ALA for 7 h and control) are also included.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249650.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Yoko Matsuoka, Suzuka Asai and Yukimi Ito (Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan) for their technical assistance.

References

  1. 1. Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1):301–7. Epub 2003/12/31. pmid:14699508.
  2. 2. Joensuu H, Hohenberger P, Corless CL. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Lancet. 2013;382(9896):973–83. Epub 2013/04/30. pmid:23623056.
  3. 3. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Riihimäki J, Nishida T, Steigen SE, Brabec P, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):265–74. Epub 2011/12/14. pmid:22153892.
  4. 4. Ahmed M. Recent advances in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(15):3142–55. Epub 2020/09/03. pmid:32874969; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7441252.
  5. 5. Akahoshi K, Oya M, Koga T, Shiratsuchi Y. Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(26):2806–17. Epub 2018/07/19. pmid:30018476; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6048423.
  6. 6. Crow P, Stone N, Kendall CA, Persad RA, Wright MP. Optical diagnostics in urology: current applications and future prospects. BJU Int. 2003;92(4):400–7. Epub 2003/08/22. pmid:12930429.
  7. 7. Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(5):392–401. Epub 2006/05/02. pmid:16648043.
  8. 8. Motoori M, Yano M, Tanaka K, Kishi K, Takahashi H, Inoue M, et al. Intraoperative photodynamic diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer patients using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(5):3035–9. Epub 2016/01/02. pmid:26722285; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4665204.
  9. 9. Denzinger S, Burger M, Walter B, Knuechel R, Roessler W, Wieland WF, et al. Clinically relevant reduction in risk of recurrence of superficial bladder cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence diagnosis: 8-year results of prospective randomized study. Urology. 2007;69(4):675–9. Epub 2007/04/21. pmid:17445650.
  10. 10. Namikawa T, Yatabe T, Inoue K, Shuin T, Hanazaki K. Clinical applications of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated fluorescence for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(29):8769–75. Epub 2015/08/14. pmid:26269666; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4528019.
  11. 11. Regula J, MacRobert AJ, Gorchein A, Buonaccorsi GA, Thorpe SM, Spencer GM, et al. Photosensitisation and photodynamic therapy of oesophageal, duodenal, and colorectal tumours using 5 aminolaevulinic acid induced protoporphyrin IX—a pilot study. Gut. 1995;36(1):67–75. Epub 1995/01/01. pmid:7890239; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1382355.
  12. 12. Yang X, Palasuberniam P, Kraus D, Chen B. Aminolevulinic Acid-Based Tumor Detection and Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms and Strategies for Enhancement. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(10):25865–80. Epub 2015/10/31. pmid:26516850; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4632830.
  13. 13. Teng L, Nakada M, Zhao SG, Endo Y, Furuyama N, Nambu E, et al. Silencing of ferrochelatase enhances 5-aminolevulinic acid-based fluorescence and photodynamic therapy efficacy. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(5):798–807. Epub 2011/02/10. pmid:21304523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3048207.
  14. 14. Inoue Y, Tanaka R, Komeda K, Hirokawa F, Hayashi M, Uchiyama K. Fluorescence detection of malignant liver tumors using 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic diagnosis: principles, technique, and clinical experience. World J Surg. 2014;38(7):1786–94. Epub 2014/02/05. pmid:24493071.
  15. 15. Kurumi H, Kanda T, Kawaguchi K, Yashima K, Koda H, Ogihara K, et al. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase is involved in the fluorescence intensity of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated laser-based photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis for early gastric cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018;22:79–85. Epub 2018/02/10. pmid:29425880.
  16. 16. Inoue K. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy for bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 2017;24(2):97–101. Epub 2017/02/14. pmid:28191719.
  17. 17. Kondo Y, Murayama Y, Konishi H, Morimura R, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, et al. Fluorescent detection of peritoneal metastasis in human colorectal cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid. Int J Oncol. 2014;45(1):41–6. Epub 2014/05/14. pmid:24821500; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4079156.
  18. 18. Hinnen P, de Rooij FW, van Velthuysen ML, Edixhoven A, van Hillegersberg R, Tilanus HW, et al. Biochemical basis of 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX accumulation: a study in patients with (pre)malignant lesions of the oesophagus. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(5):679–82. Epub 1998/09/23. pmid:9744510; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2063052.
  19. 19. Rodriguez L, Batlle A, Di Venosa G, MacRobert AJ, Battah S, Daniel H, et al. Study of the mechanisms of uptake of 5-aminolevulinic acid derivatives by PEPT1 and PEPT2 transporters as a tool to improve photodynamic therapy of tumours. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(9):1530–9. Epub 2006/04/25. pmid:16632403.
  20. 20. Yonemura Y, Endo Y, Canbay E, Liu Y, Ishibashi H, Mizumoto A, et al. Photodynamic Detection of Peritoneal Metastases Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (ALA). Cancers (Basel). 2017;9(3). Epub 2017/03/04. pmid:28257041; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5366818.
  21. 21. El-Khatib M, Tepe C, Senger B, Dibué-Adjei M, Riemenschneider MJ, Stummer W, et al. Aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy of human meningioma: an in vitro study on primary cell lines. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(5):9936–48. Epub 2015/05/06. pmid:25941934; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4463626.
  22. 22. Kim CH, Chung CW, Choi KH, Yoo JJ, Kim DH, Jeong YI, et al. Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy via reactive oxygen species in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:1357–63. Epub 2011/07/16. pmid:21760730; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3133526.
  23. 23. Hino H, Murayama Y, Nakanishi M, Inoue K, Nakajima M, Otsuji E. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy using light-emitting diodes of different wavelengths in a mouse model of peritoneally disseminated gastric cancer. J Surg Res. 2013;185(1):119–26. Epub 2013/06/12. pmid:23746762.
  24. 24. Mohammadi Z, Sazgarnia A, Rajabi O, Soudmand S, Esmaily H, Sadeghi HR. An in vitro study on the photosensitivity of 5-aminolevulinic acid conjugated gold nanoparticles. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2013;10(4):382–8. Epub 2013/11/29. pmid:24284090.
  25. 25. Sailer R, Strauss WS, Wagner M, Emmert H, Schneckenburger H. Relation between intracellular location and photodynamic efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX in vitro. Comparison between human glioblastoma cells and other cancer cell lines. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2007;6(2):145–51. Epub 2007/02/06. pmid:17277837.
  26. 26. Ohgari Y, Miyata Y, Miyagi T, Gotoh S, Ohta T, Kataoka T, et al. Roles of porphyrin and iron metabolisms in the δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-induced accumulation of protoporphyrin and photodamage of tumor cells. Photochem Photobiol. 2011;87(5):1138–45. Epub 2011/06/15. pmid:21668870.
  27. 27. Zakaria S, Gamal-Eldeen AM, El-Daly SM, Saleh S. Synergistic apoptotic effect of Doxil ® and aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy on human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2014;11(2):227–38. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24632331.
  28. 28. Hirano T, Hagiya Y, Fukuhara H, Inoue K, Shuin T, Matsumoto K, et al. Improvement of aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic diagnosis using n-propyl gallate. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2013;10(1):28–32. Epub 2013/03/08. pmid:23465369.
  29. 29. Kobuchi H, Moriya K, Ogino T, Fujita H, Inoue K, Shuin T, et al. Mitochondrial localization of ABC transporter ABCG2 and its function in 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated protoporphyrin IX accumulation. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50082. Epub 2012/11/29. pmid:23189181; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3506543.
  30. 30. Datta SN, Loh CS, MacRobert AJ, Whatley SD, Matthews PN. Quantitative studies of the kinetics of 5-aminolaevulinic acid-induced fluorescence in bladder transitional cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(8):1113–8. Epub 1998/10/29. pmid:9792160; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2063156.
  31. 31. Yamamoto M, Fujita H, Katase N, Inoue K, Nagatsuka H, Utsumi K, et al. Improvement of the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic treatment in human oral squamous cell carcinoma HSC-4. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67(3):153–64. Epub 2013/06/28. pmid:23804138.
  32. 32. Suzuki C, Tsuji AB, Kato K, Kikuchi T, Sudo H, Okada M, et al. Preclinical characterization of 5-amino-4-oxo-[6-11C]hexanoic acid as an imaging probe to estimate protoporphyrin IX accumulation induced by exogenous aminolevulinic acid. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(10):1671–7. Epub 2014/08/16. pmid:25125482.
  33. 33. Chen X, Zhao P, Chen F, Li L, Luo R. Effect and mechanism of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in esophageal cancer. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(1):69–78. Epub 2010/08/03. pmid:20676910.
  34. 34. White B, Rossi V, Baugher PJ. Aminolevulinic Acid-Mediated Photodynamic Therapy Causes Cell Death in MG-63 Human Osteosarcoma Cells. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(9):400–5. Epub 2016/08/09. pmid:27500317.
  35. 35. Rud E, Gederaas O, Høgset A, Berg K. 5-aminolevulinic acid, but not 5-aminolevulinic acid esters, is transported into adenocarcinoma cells by system BETA transporters. Photochem Photobiol. 2000;71(5):640–7. Epub 2000/05/20. pmid:10818796.
  36. 36. Kitajima Y, Ishii T, Kohda T, Ishizuka M, Yamazaki K, Nishimura Y, et al. Mechanistic study of PpIX accumulation using the JFCR39 cell panel revealed a role for dynamin 2-mediated exocytosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8666. Epub 2019/06/19. pmid:31209282; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6572817 study was solely supported by the research and development budget of SBI Pharmaceuticals and was not sponsored by any other organizations.
  37. 37. Fujimoto S, Muguruma N, Okamoto K, Kurihara T, Sato Y, Miyamoto Y, et al. A Novel Theranostic Combination of Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Laser Irradiation Targeting c-KIT for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Theranostics. 2018;8(9):2313–28. Epub 2018/05/04. pmid:29721082; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5928892.
  38. 38. Tanaka M, Kataoka H, Yano S, Ohi H, Moriwaki K, Akashi H, et al. Antitumor effects in gastrointestinal stromal tumors using photodynamic therapy with a novel glucose-conjugated chlorin. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(4):767–75. Epub 2014/02/21. pmid:24552777.
  39. 39. Tanaka M, Kataoka H, Mabuchi M, Sakuma S, Takahashi S, Tujii R, et al. Anticancer effects of novel photodynamic therapy with glycoconjugated chlorin for gastric and colon cancer. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(3):763–9. Epub 2011/04/19. pmid:21498693.
  40. 40. Kaneko S, Kaneko S. Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Malignant Glioma with 5-ALA. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2016;2016:6135293. Epub 2016/07/19. pmid:27429612; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4939363.
  41. 41. Suzuki T, Wada S, Eguchi H, Adachi J, Mishima K, Matsutani M, et al. Cadherin 13 overexpression as an important factor related to the absence of tumor fluorescence in 5-aminolevulinic acid-guided resection of glioma. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(5):1331–9. Epub 2013/09/10. pmid:24010971.
  42. 42. Tipirneni KE, Rosenthal EL, Moore LS, Haskins AD, Udayakumar N, Jani AH, et al. Fluorescence Imaging for Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19(5):645–55. Epub 2017/02/06. pmid:28155079.
  43. 43. Gèze M, Morlière P, Mazière JC, Smith KM, Santus R. Lysosomes, a key target of hydrophobic photosensitizers proposed for photochemotherapeutic applications. J Photochem Photobiol B. 1993;20(1):23–35. Epub 1993/09/01. pmid:8229466.
  44. 44. Hamblin MR, Miller JL, Rizvi I, Ortel B, Maytin EV, Hasan T. Pegylation of a chlorin(e6) polymer conjugate increases tumor targeting of photosensitizer. Cancer Res. 2001;61(19):7155–62. Epub 2001/10/05. pmid:11585749.
  45. 45. Schwartz L, Supuran CT, Alfarouk KO. The Warburg Effect and the Hallmarks of Cancer. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2017;17(2):164–70. Epub 2016/11/03. pmid:27804847.
  46. 46. Namikawa T, Fujisawa K, Munekage E, Iwabu J, Uemura S, Tsujii S, et al. Clinical application of photodynamic medicine technology using light-emitting fluorescence imaging based on a specialized luminous source. Med Mol Morphol. 2018;51(4):187–93. Epub 2018/04/06. pmid:29619546.
  47. 47. Inoue K, Fukuhara H, Shimamoto T, Kamada M, Iiyama T, Miyamura M, et al. Comparison between intravesical and oral administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid in the clinical benefit of photodynamic diagnosis for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Cancer. 2012;118(4):1062–74. Epub 2011/07/21. pmid:21773973.
  48. 48. Nishie H, Kataoka H, Yano S, Kikuchi JI, Hayashi N, Narumi A, et al. A next-generation bifunctional photosensitizer with improved water-solubility for photodynamic therapy and diagnosis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(45):74259–68. Epub 2016/10/07. pmid:27708235; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5342051.
  49. 49. Buytaert E, Callewaert G, Hendrickx N, Scorrano L, Hartmann D, Missiaen L, et al. Role of endoplasmic reticulum depletion and multidomain proapoptotic BAX and BAK proteins in shaping cell death after hypericin-mediated photodynamic therapy. Faseb j. 2006;20(6):756–8. Epub 2006/02/04. pmid:16455754.
  50. 50. Ali-Seyed M, Bhuvaneswari R, Soo KC, Olivo M. Photolon™—photosensitization induces apoptosis via ROS-mediated cross-talk between mitochondria and lysosomes. Int J Oncol. 2011;39(4):821–31. Epub 2011/07/05. pmid:21725591.
  51. 51. Li PX, Mu JH, Xiao HL, Li DH. Antitumor effect of photodynamic therapy with a novel targeted photosensitizer on cervical carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2015;33(1):125–32. Epub 2014/11/08. pmid:25376180.
  52. 52. Chen JY, Cheung NH, Fung MC, Wen JM, Leung WN, Mak NK. Subcellular localization of merocyanine 540 (MC540) and induction of apoptosis in murine myeloid leukemia cells. Photochem Photobiol. 2000;72(1):114–20. Epub 2000/07/27. pmid:10911735.
  53. 53. Kushibiki T, Noji T, Ebihara Y, Hontani K, Ono M, Kuwabara S, et al. 5-Aminolevulinic-acid-mediated Photodynamic Diagnosis Enhances the Detection of Peritoneal Metastases in Biliary Tract Cancer in Mice. In Vivo. 2017;31(5):905–8. Epub 2017/09/09. pmid:28882957; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5656864.
  54. 54. Nakamura M, Nishikawa J, Hamabe K, Goto A, Nishimura J, Shibata H, et al. Preliminary study of photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid in gastric and colorectal tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(21):6706–12. Epub 2015/06/16. pmid:26074709; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4458781.
  55. 55. Kawai N, Hirohashi Y, Ebihara Y, Saito T, Murai A, Saito T, et al. ABCG2 expression is related to low 5-ALA photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) efficacy and cancer stem cell phenotype, and suppression of ABCG2 improves the efficacy of PDD. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216503. Epub 2019/05/15. pmid:31083682; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6513434.