Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prevalence and factors associated with dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi adults

  • Nurshad Ali ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    nur_rubd@yahoo.com, nali-bmb@sust.edu

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh

  • Mitu Samadder,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Department of Food Engineering and Tea Technology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh

  • Rahanuma Raihanu Kathak,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh

  • Farjana Islam

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh

Abstract

Background

Dyslipidemia is one of the modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This study was designed to estimate the prevalence and factors associated with dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi adults.

Methods

A total of 603 participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited in the study. Serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were analyzed using enzymatic colorimetric methods. Dyslipidemia was defined based on serum lipids levels following the standard guidelines by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to evaluate risk factors associated with dyslipidemia.

Results

The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 89% with no significant difference between male (90.1%) and female (85.7) subjects. The prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was 51.7%, hypercholesterolemia 41.6%, high LDL 43.9% and low HDL 78.8%. When participants were classified into healthy control, hypertensive and diabetic groups, the lipid levels and prevalence of lipid abnormalities were higher in hypertensive and diabetic groups compared to the control group. Low HDL level was the main prevalent dyslipidemia among study subjects. The prevalence of isolated hypertriglyceridemia, isolated hypercholesterolemia, and isolated low HDL-C was 24.7%, 14.7%, and 25.5%, respectively. Mixed hyperlipidemia was prevalent in 26.9% of the participants. According to the logistic regression analysis, significant associated factors of dyslipidemia were increased age, overweight, general and abdominal obesity, hypertension, diabetes and inadequate physical activity.

Conclusions

This study shows a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi adults. Important risk factors of dyslipidemia are increased age, overweight, general and abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension and low physical activity. Our results suggest that awareness-raising programs are required to prevent and control dyslipidemia among Bangladeshi adults.

Introduction

Dyslipidemia is the abnormal lipid status in the blood that is defined as an elevated level of triglycerides (TG), or elevated total cholesterol (TC), or elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or a combination of these features. The global burden of dyslipidemia has increased over the past three decades and is considered an important public health issue both in low-middle-income and high-income countries [1]. Dyslipidemia is a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and related mortality in both developed and developing nations [2]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the global prevalence of elevated plasma levels of TC in adults aged ≥25 years was ∼39% in 2008 and more than one-third of mortality caused by CVD was attributable to raised plasma LDL-C levels [1].

In recent years, rapid urbanization, socioeconomic development, increased life expectancy, imbalanced diet, and lifestyle changes have led to a higher rate of CVD in the Southeast Asian population [3]. Bangladesh is one of the developing countries in Southeast Asia and has experienced an upward trend in the prevalence of non-communicable diseases and associated mortality over the last few decades [4, 5]. A recent literature review indicated an increasing trend in the prevalence of CVD in Bangladeshi adults higher in the urban population than rural population [6]. Several studies have reported an increased prevalence of dyslipidemia a modifiable risk factor of CVD in South Asian Countries including Bangladesh [711]

Screening and identification of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors are important steps to prevent the progression and incidence of cardiovascular diseases in every nation; however, there is a lack of correct statistics on the status of dyslipidemia and its determinants in the majority of developing countries [12, 13]. Data on dyslipidemia prevalence in the general population in Bangladesh is insufficient. Although, some early studies determined the prevalence of dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi adults; most of the studies were conducted at small scales and either on hypertensive or diabetic populations. Moreover, the associated risk factors of dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi populations are not well defined yet. In addition, there is a lack of data on dyslipidemia prevalence in recent years in Bangladesh. Knowing the current prevalence of dyslipidemia is an important step for enhancing awareness and for appropriate planning of health programs for preventing dyslipidemia and its adverse health effects. Furthermore, a lack of sufficient knowledge of the current status of dyslipidemia affects the implementation of appropriate programming and treatment approaches. Considering these aspects, we conducted this cross-sectional study that included healthy control, diabetic and hypertensive individuals to estimate the prevalence and factors associated with dyslipidemia.

Methods

Study area and study cohort

This study was conducted from January 2019 to March 2020 at the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST), Sylhet, Bangladesh. A total of 603 participants (general adults, academic staff members and students) were randomly recruited from the Sylhet region in Bangladesh. Diabetic subjects were enrolled at Sylhet Diabetic Hospital where they went for their regular health check-up. The diabetic participants were already diagnosed by the physicians. Inclusion criteria: (i) both sexes (ii) willingness to participate; and (ii) age ≥ 18 years. Exclusion criteria: (i) chronic inflammation; (ii) free from liver and kidney dysfunction, and infectious diseases; (iii) pregnant women and lactating mothers and (ii) participants did not complete the questionnaire and tests. The survey was approved by the Ethical Review Committee at Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, SUST (approval code: 02/BMB/2019). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to study commencement. All methods of the study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Data collection

The study subject’s interviews and anthropometric and demographic data collection were performed by trained personnel. According to the standard procedures, the anthropometric information such as height, weight, waist and hip circumference (WC and HC, respectively) were measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated [1418]. Blood pressure was measured using a standardized automatic sphygmomanometer (Omron M10, Omron Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The study subjects were rested for at least 10 min and then three consecutive measurements of blood pressure (BP) were taken 5 min apart. The avoid errors, the first reading of BP was discarded and the mean of 2nd and 3rd readings was considered for systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively).

Blood sampling and laboratory measurements

Venous blood samples were obtained from the participants in the morning after overnight fasting. After centrifugation, the serum was isolated and stored at -80°C until lipid markers analysis. The levels of serum glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) were analyzed using enzymatic colorimetric methods [1922]. A semi-automated bioanalyzer was used to measure all the biochemical markers (Humalyzer 3000, USA). All biochemical measurements were done in one laboratory using similar methods, throughout the assay period.

Diagnostic criteria

The lipid levels were classified following the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines [23]. Dyslipidemia was defined as having at least one of the following: TC ≥ 200 mg/dL; TG: ≥ 150 mg/dL; LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL. Isolated hypercholesterolemia was defined as a TC ≥ 200 mg/dL and TG < 150 mg/dL; isolated hypertriglyceridemia was defined as serum TG ≥ 150 mg/dL and TC < 200 mg/dL; isolated low HDL-C was defined as HDL-C ≤ 40 mg/dL without hypertriglyceridemia or hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia were defined as TG ≥ 150 mg/dL and TC ≥ 200 mg/ dL. Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mm Hg and/or the use of antihypertensive drugs [2426]. Diabetes was defined following American Diabetes Association 2020 guidelines as a fasting blood plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dL (7 mmol/L), non-fasting plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), or use of anti-diabetic medications [27, 28]. BMI was categorized into normal weight (18.5–23.0 kg/m2), overweight (23.1–27.5 kg/m2), and obesity (≥ 27.5 kg/m2) [2931]. Smoking status was classified into nonsmoker and current smoker. Physical activity was defined according to the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) [32]. Physical activity was classified as low or sedentary, moderate, and adequate or vigorous [30].

Statistical analyses

All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD while categorical variables were presented as percentages. The differences between the groups were determined using an independent sample t-test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between blood lipids and associated risk factors. In the regression model, elevated serum levels of TG, TC, HDL-C, and LDL-C were dependent variables and anthropometrics, demographics, and lifestyles were the independent variables. P values less than 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study subjects

Characteristics of the study subjects, as stratified by gender, are presented in Table 1. A total of 603 participants (451 males and 152 females) aged ≥ 18 years were included in this study. The mean age of the participants was 37.9 ± 13.1 years with no significant difference between genders. The mean value for BMI showed no significant difference between genders. Males had a significantly higher mean level of TG (193.3 ± 110.6 mg/dL) compared to females (142.1 ± 88.2 mg/dL) (p<0.001). On the other hand, females had a significantly higher mean level of TC, LDL and HDL (215.3 ± 86.7 mg/dL, 151.0 ± 83.7 mg/dL and 36.6 ± 10.1 mg/dL, respectively) compared to males (198.5 ± 70.3 mg/dL, 129.0 ± 60.8 mg/dL and 32.6 ± 12.7 mg/dL, respectively) participants (p<0.05 at least for all cases). The participants were categorized into healthy control, diabetic and hypertensive based on BP and fasting blood glucose levels. 51.4% of the participants were hypertensive and 19.6% of the participants were diabetic. About 78% of the participants were used to moderate or adequate physical activities and 16% of the participants were used to smoking.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280672.t001

Prevalence of dyslipidemia among study subjects

The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 89% with no significant difference between male (90.1%) and female (85.7) subjects (Table 2). When participants were classified into healthy, hypertensive and diabetic groups, the prevalence of dyslipidemia was 84.3%, 91.8% and 88.7%, respectively (Table 2). The levels of lipid profile and prevalence of lipid abnormalities were higher in hypertensive and diabetic individuals than in the control individuals. Overall, hypertriglyceridemia prevalence was 51.7%, hypercholesterolemia 41.6%, high LDL 43.9% and low HDL 78.8% among the participants (Table 3). Low HDL levels were the main prevalent dyslipidemia among the study subjects. The prevalence of isolated hypertriglyceridemia, isolated hypercholesterolemia, and isolated low HDL-C were 24.7%, 14.7%, and 25.5%, respectively (Table 4). Mixed hyperlipidemia was found in 26.9% of the subjects. Hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL prevalence were higher in males, whereas, hypercholesterolemia and high LDL prevalence were higher in females (p<0.05 at least for all cases) (Fig 1). An increased prevalence of abnormal lipid profiles was observed in 31–40 years and 41–50 years age groups.

thumbnail
Fig 1.

Prevalence of dyslipidemia in the gender (A), health status (B) and age (C) groups. In (A), ap<0.001; bp<0.05; cp<0.01 when the prevalence in the female group is compared to the male group. In (B), ap<0.01; bp< 0.001 and cp<0.05 when the prevalence in hypertensive and diabetic groups are compared to the control group. In (C), a,b,cp<0.001; dp<0.05 when the prevalence in the >60 years age group is compared to the lowest age group. P-values are derived from the Chi-square test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280672.g001

thumbnail
Table 3. Levels and prevalence of elevated lipid markers in different groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280672.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Prevalence of dyslipidemia according to isolated and mixed phenotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280672.t004

Multivariate logistic regression analysis for assessing the risk factors of dyslipidemia

Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with lipid profile abnormalities (Table 5). Hypertriglyceridemia was positively and independently associated with 31–40 years, 41–50 years, and >60 years age groups, male gender, overweight, general obesity and lower education level. Hypercholesterolemia was positively associated with 31–40 years, 41–50 years, and 51–60 years age groups, overweight, general and abdominal obesity, hypertension, diabetes and low physical activity. High LDL was positively associated with 41–50 years and >60 years age groups, overweight, general and abdominal obesity, hypertension, and low physical activity. Low HDL was positively associated with all age groups, overweight, general and abdominal obesity.

thumbnail
Table 5. Multivariable logistic regression for assessing factors independently associated with dyslipidemia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280672.t005

Discussion

The findings of this study show that dyslipidemia is widely prevalent in Bangladeshi adults. We estimated the prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors in healthy control, hypertensive and diabetic populations. The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 89% of which 84.3%, 91.8% and 88.7% in the control, hypertensive and diabetic groups, respectively. Overall, the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was 51.7%, hypercholesterolemia at 41.6%, high LDL at 43.9% and low at HDL 78.8% among the participants. Among the study subjects, the most prevalent dyslipidemia was low levels of HDL-C. Both lipid markers level and the prevalence of lipid markers abnormalities were higher in diabetic and hypertensive subjects compared to the healthy control subjects.

The prevalence of CVD is a growing epidemic throughout the world with dyslipidemia being one of its major modifiable risk factors. Some previous studies indicated that the increased prevalence of CVD among the South Asian population is primarily due to the pattern of dyslipidemia [33]. Population surveillance is an important step in identifying and monitoring the risk factors for CVD; however, in Bangladesh, there is insufficient community-based data on the prevalence of dyslipidemia and CVD. A previous survey conducted in 2005–2011 in a sub-urban population of Mymensingh district in Bangladesh reported the prevalence of dyslipidemia as 17.8% of high TG, 16.9% of high TC, 15.7% of high LDL-C and 8.8% of low HDL [8]. In our study, the overall prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was 51.7%, hypercholesterolemia 41.6%, high LDL 43.9% and low HDL 78.8% which is high than those reported in the previous study [8]. Another previous study by Chowdhury et al estimated the levels of lipid profile among subjects (aged 30–60 years) who went to the National Centre for Control of Rheumatic Fever and Heart Disease (NCCRF&HD) in Dhaka, for routine health check-ups [3]. The authors reported an elevated level of lipid profile markers in hypertensive individuals than in normotensive individuals, although the prevalence of dyslipidemia was not presented in the study. Similar to this study findings [3] we also found a higher level of lipid profile among hypertensive subjects than in the normotensive subjects. One of the major limitations of that study [3] was that the participants were recruited from an urban hospital which actually does not represent all hypertensive patients in Bangladesh. A further study conducted in the Noakhali District, a southern part of Bangladesh, reported the prevalence of dyslipidemia among diabetic patients recruited from two diabetic hospitals [34]. The results showed the prevalence of dyslipidemia at 73% in males and 71% in females, with high TG at 41.96%, high TC at 35.42%, high LDL at 71.33% and low HDL at 49.70%. In our diabetic participants, the overall prevalence of dyslipidemia (88.7%) and individual lipid abnormalities (high TG 54.2%, high TC 48.1%, high LDL 52.7% and low HDL 81.7%) were higher than those reported by Das and Bank except for high LDL [34]. Another study conducted in the Kushtia region in Bangladesh reported comparatively a lower prevalence of dyslipidemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients 72.6% in males and 75.7% in females [35]. However, the prevalence of individual lipid abnormalities in that study (high TG 57.6%, high TC 52.3%, high LDL 50% and low HDL 74.2%) [35] was close to the prevalence level observed in our study.

Some studies in our neighbouring countries like India and Pakistan also reported the prevalence and factors associated with dyslipidemia in the general population. For example, in a study by Joshi et al, the overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 79%, hypertriglyceridemia 29.5%, hypercholesterolemia 13.9%, high LDL-C 11.8% and low HDL-C 72.3% in Indian population [10]. A study in Pakistan reported a prevalence of dyslipidemia of 98.1% in diabetic subjects, 97.3% in pre-diabetes subjects and 95.2% in the non-diabetic population which is slightly higher than those found in our study [36]. In that study 48.9% of participants had hypertriglyceridemia, 39.3% had hypercholesterolemia, and 39.7% had high LDL-C levels while 83.9% of men and 90% of women had low levels of HDL-C [36]. In our study and the other studies in our neighbouring countries, the most prevalent dyslipidemia was low HDL levels, although the exact reasons are not clear why low HDL-C level is highly prevalent in the South Asian population, further studies are needed to get insights into it. It has been suggested that high levels of HDL-C play protective effects by reducing the cholesterol entry rate into the cells and increasing the cholesterol release rate from cells by promoting reverse cholesterol transport via scavenging excess levels of cholesterol from peripheral tissues [37]. Furthermore, high levels of HDL-C also inhibit LDL-C oxidation and atherogenic effects of oxidized LDL-C through its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It has been shown that an increase of 1 mg of serum HDL-C correlates with the reduction of coronary heart disease risk by 2% in men and 3% in women [38]. However, the protective roles of HDL-C in CVD in the South Asian population appear to be little compared to the other ethnic population. Whether low levels of HDL-C are a real risk factor for increased cardiovascular risk in South Asians remains unclear, and further studies are needed to get into the insights.

On the other hand, TG to HDL-C ratio is considered an inflammatory and metabolic predictor. Some studies indicated high TG to HDL-C ratio levels as a useful marker in predicting non-alcoholic hepatosteatosis and poor blood pressure control [39, 40]. It has also been suggested that the uric acid to HDL-C ratio is associated with poor blood pressure control and could be a predictor of diabetic control in men with type 2 diabetes [41, 42]. The increased burden of dyslipidemia in hypertensive and diabetic patients and related complications can be reduced by the management of hypertension and diabetes. Further research is needed to determine the management of dyslipidemia and related complications. Adequate knowledge of various factors controlling hypertension and diabetes and their complications is important. An unhealthy diet, poor management strategies, treatment and lifestyle are the possible leading causes of dyslipidemia and related complications.

In the present study, the prevalence of dyslipidemia was comparatively higher in males than in females, although some lipid markers levels (TC, HDL-C and LDL-C) were higher in female participants. A higher prevalence of dyslipidemia was also found in males in the previous study in Bangladesh [34] and Pakistan [43]. Although, there are some other studies where an opposite finding ie., a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia was found in females than in their counterparts [35, 36]. An increasing trend of lipid abnormalities with age was observed among our participants. Similar findings were found in a study conducted in India [10]. Increased prevalence of dyslipidemia in females with ages might be related to menopausal transition and loss of estrogen, which may act as a triggering factor and increase metabolic dysfunction [44, 45]. However, considering the management of lipid profile, attention should also pay to males especially in the middle age 31–50 and females >50 years in both screening and intervention of dyslipidemia in Bangladeshi adults since these subgroups are at more risk of having dyslipidemia.

The present study shows that increased age, general and abdominal obesity, hypertension, diabetes and inadequate physical activity were significant risk factors for dyslipidemia. The link between dyslipidemia and the risk of CVD is well proven and the tendency for certain CVD risk factors to be clustered, such as insulin resistance, obesity, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia and hypertension, referred to as the metabolic syndrome [46]. It is well known that obesity is one of the major contributors to dyslipidemia. In the present study, overweight, general and central obesity were the significant risk factors for dyslipidemia. Similar findings were reported in previous studies [4750]. Furthermore, low or inadequate physical activities were associated with the risk of dyslipidemia in our study. This was in accordance with early studies [49, 51, 52]. Some intervention studies also showed that adequate exercise as physical activity can improve lipid profile status, resulting in a reduction in TG levels and an increase in HDL-C levels [53, 54]. Thus, a proper community-based prevention strategy focusing on behavioural changes, especially promoting regular physical activities would be useful to control and reduce dyslipidemia.

Finally, our study results along with some early studies indicated that dyslipidemia prevalence is increasing at an alarming rate in the Bangladeshi population. Therefore, appropriate comprehensive national health policy should be implemented on a priority basis. The associated risk factors of dyslipidemia can be reduced by increasing awareness, implementation of proper public health policy, management of hypertension and diabetes and a healthy lifestyle. A major strength of our study was that it provided important information regarding the prevalence and associated factors of dyslipidemia both in healthy and diabetic and hypertensive individuals. However, there were some limitations in our study which should be taken into consideration. Firstly, we did not have data on the food habits of the participants, therefore we could not analyse the dietary factors associated with dyslipidemia. Secondly, our study was a cross-sectional design, thus, cannot determine causality. Thirdly, the sample size in the present study was relatively small, therefore, our findings do not represent the entire population of the country. Further investigations especially longitudinal studies are needed to get deep insights into the prevalence and risk factors of dyslipidemia among the Bangladeshi population.

Conclusions

This study found a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia among the study participants. Low HDL was the most frequent form of dyslipidemia among the participants, followed by an elevated level of TG. Increased age, general and abdominal obesity, diabetes, hypertension and inadequate physical activity were significant risk factors for dyslipidemia. Our findings suggest the need for screening programs for assessing blood lipid levels as well as effective intervention programs targeting associated risk factors reduction and prevention of adverse effects of dyslipidemia. Routine measurement of blood lipids needs to be included in the treatment of hypertensive and diabetic individuals for optimum health care. Furthermore, lipid-lowering drugs and anti-diabetic drugs should be affordable to patients to avoid sudden complications.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to all participants for their active participation and cooperation in the study.

References

  1. 1. Pirillo A, Casula M, Olmastroni E, Norata GD, Catapano AL. Global epidemiology of dyslipidaemias. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18: 689–700. pmid:33833450
  2. 2. American Heart Association. American Heart Association—Building healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. n.d. http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/?identifier¼536.
  3. 3. Choudhury KN, Mainuddin AKM, Wahiduzzaman M, Islam SMS. Serum lipid profile and its association with hypertension in Bangladesh. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014;10: 327–332. pmid:25061312
  4. 4. Ahsan Karar Z, Alam N, Kim Streatfield P. Epidemiological transition in rural Bangladesh, 1986–2006. Glob Health Action. 2009;2: 1904. pmid:20027273
  5. 5. Saquib N, Saquib J, Ahmed T, Khanam MA, Cullen MR. Cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies between 1995 and 2010. BMC Public Health. 2012;12: 434. pmid:22694854
  6. 6. Chowdhury MZI, Haque MA, Farhana Z, Anik AM, Chowdhury AH, Haque SM, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease among Bangladeshi adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018;14: 165. pmid:30174432
  7. 7. Kumar Das S. Serum Lipid Profile Among Urban and Rural Bangladeshi Population. J Obes Weight Loss Ther. 2012;02.
  8. 8. Islam N, Rahman MZ, Choudhury S, Afrin L, Rahman S, Aftabuddin M. Prevalence of Dyslipidemia and Associated Factors among the Sub-Urban Bangladeshi Population. Univ Heart J. 2012;8: 15–19.
  9. 9. Mithal A, Majhi D, Shunmugavelu M, Talwarkar P, Vasnawala H, Raza A. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in adult Indian diabetic patients: A cross sectional study (SOLID). Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;18: 642. pmid:25285280
  10. 10. Joshi SR, Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Bhansali A, Dhandania VK, et al. Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Urban and Rural India: The ICMR–INDIAB Study. Goel K, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e96808. pmid:24817067
  11. 11. Gupta R, Rao RS, Misra A, Sharma SK. Recent trends in epidemiology of dyslipidemias in India. Indian Heart J. 2017;69: 382–392. pmid:28648438
  12. 12. Carlsson Å, Borgström F, Stålhammar J, Alemao E, Yin D, Jönsson L. Cost of care for patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs. PharmacoEconomics. 2004;22: 25–35. pmid:15669151
  13. 13. Franco OH. Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59: 927–933. pmid:16234419
  14. 14. Ali N, Mahmood S, Manirujjaman M, Perveen R, Al Nahid A, Ahmed S, et al. Hypertension prevalence and influence of basal metabolic rate on blood pressure among adult students in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2018;18: 1–9.
  15. 15. Rahman S, Islam S, Haque T, Kathak RR, Ali N. Association between serum liver enzymes and hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Bangladeshi adults. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20: 1–7.
  16. 16. Saadi MM, Roy MN, Haque R, Tania FA, Mahmood S, Ali N. Association of microalbuminuria with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Endocr Disord. 2020;20: 153. pmid:33028296
  17. 17. Mou AD, Barman Z, Hasan M, Miah R, Hafsa JM, Das Trisha A, et al. Prevalence of preeclampsia and the associated risk factors among pregnant women in Bangladesh. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 1–9.
  18. 18. Hasan M, Fariha KA, Barman Z, Mou AD, Miah R, Habib A, et al. Assessment of the relationship between serum xanthine oxidase levels and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 20816. pmid:36460780
  19. 19. Ali N, Rahman S, Islam S, Haque T, Molla NH, Sumon AH, et al. The relationship between serum uric acid and lipid profile in Bangladeshi adults. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19: 1–7.
  20. 20. Ali N, Miah R, Hasan M, Barman Z, Mou AD, Hafsa JM, et al. Association between serum uric acid and metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study in Bangladeshi adults. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 1–7.
  21. 21. Haque T, Rahman S, Islam S, Molla NH, Ali N. Assessment of the relationship between serum uric acid and glucose levels in healthy, prediabetic and diabetic individuals. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2019;11: 1–8.
  22. 22. Kathak RR, Sumon AH, Molla NH, Hasan M, Miah R, Tuba HR, et al. The association between elevated lipid profile and liver enzymes: a study on Bangladeshi adults. Sci Rep. 2022;12: 1–8.
  23. 23. Cleeman JI, Grundy SM, Becker D, Clark L. Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III). Jama. 2001;285: 2486–2497.
  24. 24. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. hypertension. 2003;42: 1206–1252. pmid:14656957
  25. 25. Ali N, Mahmood S, Islam F, Rahman S, Haque T, Islam S, et al. Relationship between serum uric acid and hypertension: a cross-sectional study in Bangladeshi adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9: 1–7.
  26. 26. Ali N, Mahmud F, Akter SA, Islam S, Sumon AH, Barman DN, et al. The prevalence of general obesity, abdominal obesity, and hypertension and its related risk factors among young adult students in Bangladesh. J Clin Hypertens. 2022.
  27. 27. Islam S, Rahman S, Haque T, Sumon AH, Ahmed AM, Ali N. Prevalence of elevated liver enzymes and its association with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study in Bangladeshi adults. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;3: e00116. pmid:32318634
  28. 28. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43: S14–S31. pmid:31862745
  29. 29. WHO. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet Lond Engl. 2004;363: 157–163. pmid:14726171
  30. 30. Ali N, Sumon AH, Fariha KA, Asaduzzaman M, Kathak RR, Molla NH, et al. Assessment of the relationship of serum liver enzymes activity with general and abdominal obesity in an urban Bangladeshi population. Sci Rep. 2021;11: 1–9.
  31. 31. Ali N, Mohanto NC, Nurunnabi SM, Haque T, Islam F. Prevalence and risk factors of general and abdominal obesity and hypertension in rural and urban residents in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22: 1–14.
  32. 32. Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health. 2009;6.
  33. 33. Zaid M, Hasnain S. Plasma lipid abnormalities in Pakistani population: trends, associated factors, and clinical implications. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51. pmid:30043855
  34. 34. Das H, Banik S. Prevalence of dyslipidemia among the diabetic patients in southern Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev. 2019;13: 252–257. pmid:30641707
  35. 35. Ahmmed MdS, Shuvo SD, Paul DK, Karim MR, Kamruzzaman Md, Mahmud N, et al. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors among newly diagnosed Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients in Kushtia, Bangladesh. Gyasi RM, editor. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2021;1: e0000003.
  36. 36. Basit A, Sabir S, Riaz M, Fawwad A, NDSP members, Abro MUR, et al. NDSP 05: Prevalence and pattern of dyslipidemia in urban and rural areas of Pakistan; a sub analysis from second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan (NDSP) 2016–2017. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19: 1215–1225. pmid:33520835
  37. 37. Ademuyiwa O, Ugbaja RN, Idumebor F, Adebawo O. Plasma lipid profiles and risk of cardiovascular disease in occupational lead exposure in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Lipids Health Dis. 2005;4: 19. pmid:16191200
  38. 38. Natarajan P, Ray KK, Cannon CP. High-Density Lipoprotein and Coronary Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55: 1283–1299. pmid:20338488
  39. 39. Kurtkulagi O, Aktas G, Taslamacioglu Duman T, Bilgin S, Atak Tel BM, Kahveci G. Correlation between serum triglyceride to HDL cholesterol ratio and blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension. Precis Med Sci. 2022;11: 100–105.
  40. 40. Kurtkulagi O, Bilgin S, Kahveci GB, Tel BMA, Kosekli MA. Could triglyceride to high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio predict hepatosteatosis? Exp Biomed Res. 2021;4: 224–229.
  41. 41. Aktas G, Khalid A, Kurtkulagi O, Duman TT, Bilgin S, Kahveci G, et al. Poorly controlled hypertension is associated with elevated serum uric acid to HDL-cholesterol ratio: a cross-sectional cohort study. Postgrad Med. 2022;134: 297–302. pmid:35142235
  42. 42. Aktas G, Kocak MZ, Bilgin S, Atak BM, Duman TT, Kurtkulagi O. Uric acid to HDL cholesterol ratio is a strong predictor of diabetic control in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Aging Male. 2020;23: 1098–1102. pmid:31615320
  43. 43. Sarfraz M, Sajid S, Ashraf MA. Prevalence and pattern of dyslipidemia in hyperglycemic patients and its associated factors among Pakistani population. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23: 761–766. pmid:27872574
  44. 44. Mendelsohn ME. Protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89: 12–17.
  45. 45. Cignarella A, Kratz M, Bolego C. Emerging role of estrogen in the control of cardiometabolic disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2010;31: 183–189. pmid:20138672
  46. 46. Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37: 1595–1607.
  47. 47. Bays HE, Chapman RH, Grandy S, SHIELD Investigators’ Group. The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61: 737–747. pmid:17493087
  48. 48. Sharma U, Kishore J, Garg A, Anand T, Chakraborty M, Lali P. Dyslipidemia and associated risk factors in a resettlement colony of Delhi. J Clin Lipidol. 2013;7: 653–660. pmid:24314364
  49. 49. Wahed WYA, El-Khashab K, Hassan SK. Prevalence of Dyslipidemia among Healthy University Students: Fayoum Governorate, Egypt. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2016;13.
  50. 50. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Liu R-H, Xie Q, Li X-L, Chen J-G, et al. Association between Health-Related Physical Fitness and Risk of Dyslipidemia in University Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study and a ROC Curve Analysis. Nutrients. 2021;14: 50. pmid:35010926
  51. 51. Al-Kaabba AF, Al-Hamdan NA, El Tahir A, Abdalla AM, Saeed AA, Hamza MA. Prevalence and correlates of dyslipidemia among adults in Saudi Arabia: results from a national survey. 2012.
  52. 52. Shawar SM, Al-Bati NA, Al-Mahameed A, Nagalla DS, Obeidat M. Hypercholesterolemia among apparently healthy university students. Oman Med J. 2012;27: 274–280. pmid:23071877
  53. 53. Erem C, Hacihasanoglu A, Deger O, Kocak M, Topbas M. Prevalence of dyslipidemia and associated risk factors among Turkish adults: Trabzon lipid study. Endocrine. 2008;34: 36–51. pmid:19003544
  54. 54. Kang W-M, Zhang J-S, Liu X-X, Wang M-S, Zhao M-L, Yu J-C. Prevalence of abnormity of blood lipid and associated factors in health examination population in Beijing. Chin Med Sci J Chung-Kuo Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsa Chih. 2009;24: 142–146. pmid:19848313