Figures
Abstract
Lycopene β-cyclase (LYCB) is the key enzyme for the synthesis of β-carotene, a valuable component of the human diet. In this study, tomato constitutively express Lycb-1 was engineered. The β-carotene level of transformant increased 4.1 fold, and the total carotenoid content increased by 30% in the fruits. In the transgenic line, the downstream α-branch metabolic fluxes were repressed during the three developmental stages while α-carotene content increased in the ripe stage. Microarray analysis in the ripe stage revealed that the constitutive expression of Lycb-1 affected a number of pathways including the synthesis of fatty acids, flavonoids and phenylpropanoids, the degradation of limonene and pinene, starch and sucrose metabolism and photosynthesis. This study provided insight into the regulatory effect of Lycb-1 gene on plant carotenoid metabolism and fruit transcriptome.
Citation: Guo F, Zhou W, Zhang J, Xu Q, Deng X (2012) Effect of the Citrus Lycopene β-Cyclase Transgene on Carotenoid Metabolism in Transgenic Tomato Fruits. PLoS ONE 7(2): e32221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032221
Editor: Randall P. Niedz, United States Department of Agriculture, United States of America
Received: October 21, 2011; Accepted: January 22, 2012; Published: February 24, 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Guo et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Nos.2011CB100601, 2011AA100205) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30830078). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Carotenoids represent a highly diverse classes of natural pigments, with >700 naturally occurring molecules of this type already catalogued [1]. Plant carotenoids are composed of a C40 isoprenoid skeleton to which are attached polyene chains containing up to 15 conjugated double bonds. Plant carotenoids are synthesized by nuclear-encoded enzymes in the plastids via the MEP pathway [2]. Their in planta function is to protect photosynthesis from damage caused by excessive light [3], [4] and to provide a substrate for the synthesis of certain phytohormones [5], [6]. They also serve as precursors for the synthesis of a number of biologically important compounds [7], [8], [9], [10]. Some carotenoids are exploited as natural food colorants, and others are used in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries [11]. They also represent an important component in human nutrition, providing both a source of provitamin A and some protection against various cancers [12].
Carotenoid synthesis is a complex secondary metabolic system [13]. In the tomato fruit, LYCB activity yields β-carotene [14], which is a major source of vitamin A for the human diet [12], [15]. The human body is unable to synthesize carotenoids, instead has to rely on their presence in the diet. As tomato fruits are rich in β-carotene precursors, there is a substantial interest in engineering carotenoid synthesis in tomato with a view to enhancing its β-carotene content. The carotenoid content of the tomato fruit has been successfully manipulated via a number of transgenic strategies. Plants expressing a Erwinia uredovora phytoene desaturase (crtI) gene, the product of which converts phytoene into lycopene, was successful in increasing fruit β-carotene content by three fold [16]. Similarly, the heterologous expression in the tomato fruit of crtB, an Erwinia uredovora phytoene synthase gene, raised it by between two and four fold, divided between phytoene, lycopene, β-carotene and lutein [17]. Plants over-expressing endogenous Lycb also produce fruit having an enhanced content of β-carotene as a result of the almost complete cyclization of lycopene [18]; meanwhile the down-regulation of DE-ETIOLATED1 (Tdet1) had a similar result [19]. The plastidial expression of a bacterial Lycb gene was able to trigger the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene, resulting in a four fold enhancement in the fruit's pro-vitamin A content [20]. Genes encoding LYCB either from Erwinia herbicola or the daffodil (Narcissus pseudonarcissus) have also been introduced into tomato plastids. While expression of the former appeared to have little effect on carotenoid composition, the product of the latter was able to efficiently convert lycopene into β-carotene [21].
The regulation of β-carotene synthesis has been widely researched. In wild type tomatoes, the B gene, which encodes a form of LYCB, is only expressed at low levels during the breaker stage of ripening, but in the Beta mutant, its transcription is substantially enhanced, resulting in a notably higher accumulation of β-carotene [14]. In cauliflower, a mutation in Or results in the deposition of substantial quantities of β-carotene in various tissues [22]. Meanwhile in maize, it has been demonstrated that the β-carotene hydroxylase 1 gene (crtRB1) is responsible for a major proportion of the variation in β-carotene concentration and conversion in the grain [23]. Nevertheless, the consequences of overproducing β-carotene, both with respect to carotenoid synthesis and to the transcriptome as a whole have not been widely explored. In this study, we have explored the effect on carotenoid synthesis of constitutively expressing a citrus Lycb-1 gene in tomato. We have compared gene expression profiles in the fruit of wild type and the transgenic plants at a variety of developmental stages, which has allowed us to evaluate the effect of the over-production of β-carotene on the expression of other genes involved in carotenoid synthesis, and on the transcriptome in the ripe stage as a whole.
Results
Transgenic tomato constitutively expressing Lycb-1
Of the 14 presumptive primary transformants regenerated by agrobacterium transformation method, 9 were proved positive by both PCR and Southern hybridization. The fruit color by these transformants ranged from yellow to red, with four plants producing clearly yellow fruit. The predominant carotenoid responsible for this changed pigmentation was β-carotene as revealed by HPLC analysis. Southern blotting revealed that the copy number of nptII in these lines ranged from one to three (Fig. S1). Single copy carrier progeny of Lycb1-T017 and -T030 were self-fertilized to generate fixed lines, as validated using a PCR-based progeny test. The effect of constitutive Lycb-1 expression during fruit development and ripening was tested in Lycb1-T017 progeny over three generations, and the same line was also used to study the effect of constitutive Lycb-1 expression on the transcriptome as a whole.
Changes in the carotenoid, sugar and ABA content of plants constitutively expressing Lycb-1
The levels of the predominant carotenoids at the mature green, breaker and ripe stages of Lycb-1 and WT fruit are shown in Table 1. At the mature green stage, the only detected carotenoids were lutein and β-carotene. The content of the former in WT was 1.1 fold higher than in Lycb-1, while for the latter, the transgenic line contained 0.2 fold more than the WT. At the breaker stage, lycopene was present in WT, but not in Lycb-1 fruit. The phytoene and lutein content of the WT fruit was, respectively, 1.6 and 1.0 fold higher than that of the Lycb-1 fruit, while the β-carotene content was 0.5 fold higher in the transgenic fruit. At the ripe stage, β-carotene persisted as the principal carotenoid in the transgenic fruit, whereas in the WT fruit, its place was taken by lycopene. The Lycb-1 fruit accumulated β-carotene up to 1.1 mg/gDW (dry weight). This increase of β-carotene greatly exceeded the extent of the decrease in lycopene, resulting in a fruit with a 30% higher content of carotenoid than the WT. Lycb-1 fruits also accumulated substantial quantities of violaxanthin, a compound which was not detected in WT fruit. Both phytoene and lutein were present at lower levels in the transgenic fruit than in the WT (by 0.4 and 0.8 fold, respectively), while the α-carotene content was 3.4 fold higher. The ABA content in Lycb-1 fruit was lower than in the WT fruit at all three developmental stages sampled (Table 1). The over-expression of Lycb-1 had no discernible effect on the carotenoid content of the leaf (Table 2). The formation of carotenoid uses sugar as early carbon source precursors in the biosynthetic pathway, because of the unexpected increase of the total carotenoid content, we analyzed the sugar contents. Results showed that the sucrose content was unaffected by the presence of the transgene at all three development stages, but the concentration of both fructose and glucose was lower in the Lycb-1 than in the WT fruit at all stages, especially at the ripe stage (Fig. 1).
Columns and bars represent, respectively, the mean and SD (n = 3), Student's t tests illustrate statistical significance (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01).M: mature green, B: breaker, R: ripe.
Effect of the constitutive expression of Lycb-1 on the expression of other carotenogenic genes
The expression levels in both Lycb-1 and WT of the genes Dxs (deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate synthase), Ggps-1 (geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase 1), Ggps-2 (geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase 2), Psy-1 (phytoene synthase 1), Psy-2 (phytoene synthase 2), Pds (phytoene desaturase), Zds (ζ-carotene desaturase), Crtiso (carotenoid isomerase), CycB (chromoplast specific lycopene β-cyclase), LycE (lycopene ε-cyclase), Bch (β-carotene hydroxylase) and Zep (zeaxanthin epoxidase) were assessed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2). At the mature green stage, except for Pds and LycE, the transcript abundance of all of these genes was lower (between 20% and 87%) in the transgenic than in the WT fruit. At the breaker stages, all of the upstream genes (Dxs, Ggps-1, Ggps-2, Psy-1, Psy-2, Pds, Zds, Crtiso, CycB) were unregulated by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1, while transcript abundance for the three downstream genes (LycE, Bch and Zep) were all lower in Lycb-1 than in WT. At the ripe stage, all but Zep were up-regulated in the transgenic fruit. Thus, Zep appeared to be down-regulated by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1 throughout fruit development.
Columns and bars represent, respectively, the mean and SD (n = 4), Student's t tests illustrate statistical significance (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01). M: mature green, B: breaker, R: ripe.
Effect of the constitutive expression of Lycb-1 on the global transcriptome
In order to investigate the impact of overexpressed Lycb-1 gene on the global transcriptome, we compared the gene expression profile of the Lycb-1 lines with that of the wild type using the tomato TOM2 long oligo array. Transcripts of 5729 endogenous genes showed differential expression, among which 2797 were up-regulated and 2932 were down-regulated. 93 unigenes was identified at least two fold difference in expression level in Lycb-1 compared to WT fruit (30 up-regulated, 63 down-regulated) (Table S1) at the ripe stage. The TFGD-based assignment to GO category classified these genes into 19 categories (Fig. 3), of which the most highly represented were concerned with binding, catalytic activity, hydrolase activity, transferase activity, protein binding and nucleotide binding. A total of 17 biochemical pathways were affected by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1. These pathways were responsible for the synthesis or degradation of secondary metabolites, fatty acids, starch and sucrose, and for photorespiration (Table 3).
RT-PCR was conducted on six of the 93 differentially expressed genes identified by the microarray analysis for validation purposes (Fig. 4). This procedure indicated a good level of consistency between the two methods of assessing gene expression.
(A) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of six selected genes in Wild-Type and Lycb-1 fruit. Columns and bars represent, respectively, the mean and SD (n = 4). (B) Expression ratios of the six selected genes derived from the microarray analysis.
Discussion
We here reported the overexpression of a citrus Lycb-1 in tomato and detected its effect on carotenoid metabolism during fruit development, as well as the effect on the transcriptome as a whole at the ripe stage.
Flux through the α-branch of the metabolic pathway
The relative activity of Lycb-1 and Lyce has been proposed as representing a possible control mechanism over the partition of flux into the β- and α-branches (end products are lutein and α-carotene respectively) of the carotenoid pathway [24], [25]. In our study, the Lycb-1 transgenic line affects the level of LYCB present, as a result, β-branch carotenoids were accumulated, while the presence of α-branch ones declined, at least in the mature green and breaker stages of fruit development. (α-carotene accumulated at the ripe stage.) The α-carotene was repressed only when its substrate lycopene became limiting in the Lycb-1 transgenic. During the mature green and breaker stages, little lycopene was accumulated in the fruit. In the transgenic fruit, the higher activity of LYCB presumably led to a greater channeling of lycopene through the β-branch of carotenoid synthesis, depleting the level of activity in the α-branch. By the time the ripe stage was reached, competition for lycopene had weakened, and the flux through the carotenoid pathway would have accordingly increased, thereby producing an increase in the content of α-carotene. In a related over-expression transgenic line, in which flux through the carotenoid pathway was enhanced, α-carotene were produced at a higher level than in the wild type; however, when the flux through the carotenoid pathway was not increased, the content of α-carotene decreased [26].
Total carotenoid content increased in LYCB transformants
The constitutive expression of a gene encoding a citrus Lycb-1 produced a notable increase in fruit carotenoid content. The effect of heterologous expression of LYCB on total carotenoid is still controversial. In tomato, heterologous expression of LYCB from Erwinia herbicola depressed carotenoid content, while expression of a daffodil LYCB gene strongly elevated it [20]. In our case, the increased carotenoid content may be partially explained by up-regulation of upstream flux. Phytoene synthase, encode by Psy gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway, many research had demonstrated that manipulation of Psy expression enhance carotenoid synthesis by directing metabolic flux into the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway [17], [27], [28]. The upstream pathway enzyme DXS has also been shown to increase carotenoid biosynthesis [29]. Studies based on transgenic potato tubers have demonstrated that altering the expression of certain carotenoid genes has a pronounced effect on carotenoid synthesis [28], [30]. Thus, an increase in either Psy and/or Dxs expression may underlie, at least in part, the observed rise in the carotenoid content of the fruit of the Lycb-1 transgenic.
Another possible reason for the increased total carotenoid in LYCB transformant may be the down regulation of genes involved in downstream flux. Zep level was consistently down-regulated by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1. ZEP is an important component for the conversion of carotenoids to ABA. The ABA content in the fruit of the Lycb-1 transgenic was much lower than that in the WT fruit across all three development stages assessed (Table 1), a behavior which is consistent with the expression profile of Zep. The suggestion is therefore that one effect of Lycb-1 over-expression is that the rate of carotenoid degradation was reduced. A reduction in Zep expression has also been reported to produce a major increase in the carotenoid content of the potato tuber [31], [32]. The synthesis of carotenoids requires sucrose, glucose and fructose as early precursors, so starch and sucrose metabolism may play a part in increasing total carotenoid content. Note that sucrose content was unaffected by the presence of the transgene, although that of both glucose and fructose was decreased, indicating a higher rate of consumption of the two monosaccharides and an increased flux into the carotenoid synthesis pathway. A reasonable working hypothesis is that the enhanced carotenoid accumulation taking place in Lycb-1 fruits is due to a combination of increased metabolic flux into the carotenoid synthetic pathway and the transcriptional control of a number of carotenoid metabolism genes.
Other pathways affected by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1
The microarray data showed that some biochemical pathways genes were affected by the constitutive expression of Lycb-1, similarly 45% metabolites were also effected in Psy-1 transgenic tomato fruits [33], while little effects had been observed in the crtB transgenic potato tubers [34]. Compare these studies with our study may indicated that the transgenic effects of carotenoid genes are different among species. The tomato fruits are rich in carotenoids while the potato tubers have little, we hypothesized that the effect of expression a carotenoid biosynthetic transgene on the endogenous pathway genes are larger in tomato fruits than that in potato tubers. The expression level of eight genes involved in phenylpropanoid synthesis was significantly changed by Lycb-1 over-expression. Two of these genes encoding the peroxidase were significantly down-regulated, which mediated the conjugation of glutathione to unsaturated phenylpropanoids, other genes are all belong to cytochrome P450 family, which play an important role in catalyzing the phenylpropanoid synthesis pathway. Three genes involved in flavone and flavonol synthesis were down-regulated by at least two fold. One of these encodes tetrahydroxychalcone (THC) 2′-glucosyltransferase which catalyzes the step of the flavones branch of THC 2′-glucoside biosynthesis. The expression of three genes associated with fatty acid synthesis was also significantly changed. These genes encode the enzyme short-chain type alcohol dehydrogenase and tropinone reductase are all belong to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family [35], which had been proved involved in the abscisic acid biosynthesis [36]. A total of six genes encoding photosynthesis-antenna proteins were transcriptionally at least twofold lower in the transgenic lines than in the WT lines. These genes are all belong to the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein family. The expression of three genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism was down-regulated in Lycb-1; one of these encodes the enzyme glucan endo-1,3-β-glucosidase which play an important role in catalyzing 1,3-β-glucan into D-glucose, one a member of the glycoside hydrolase family involves into the interconversion of pentose and glucuronate, and the third a mannan synthase involves into the cellulose synthesis. A pyruvate kinase isozyme A (which catalyzes pyruvate metabolism) was also down-regulated by more than two fold in the Lycb-1 transgenic fruit. One of gene encoding the enzyme 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehyrogenase (a key component of fatty acid elongation) was significantly down-regulated, so fatty acid synthesis may be compromised in the transgenic line.
Materials and Methods
Generation of tomato material
The tomato cultivar Zhongshu No. 5 was transformed via agroinfection, using the methods described as [37]. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain used was EHA 105, kanamycin resistance was employed as a selection marker, and the CaMV 35 S promoter provided the means to induce constitutive expression of the entire 1.2 kb Lycb-1 open reading frame. The wild type cultivar and its derived Lycb-1 over-expressor have been designated WT and Lycb-1, respectively. Plants were glasshouse-grown under supplementary lighting, with full watering and fertilization given as required. PCR validation of transformation events were based on DNA extracted from young leaf material, as described in [38]. In brief, young leaves were full ground in a mortar and pestle under 200 µl lysis buffer, after that 550 µl lysis buffer was added and vortexes for 1 min. Then, Incubate in 65°C waterbath for 60 min. Fill the tube with chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (600 mL; 24∶1 v/v) and vortexed for 3 min. Samples were centrifuged at room temperature for 5 min at 10,000 rpm. Pipet off aqueous phase (usually approximately 0.5 mL) was transferred into new microfuge tubes. Add 2/3 to 1 times the volume of cold isopropanol to the tube. Immediately spin at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The nucleic acid pellets was washed with 75% ethanol by volume, air dried, resuspended in 50 µl of TE. PCR was performed using the following program: denaturation, 94°C for 1 min; annealing, 57°C for 1 min; extension, 72°C for 1.5 min; number of cycles, 30; final extension, 72°C for 10 min.Southern blotting experiments were based on standard procedures. Genomic DNA (20 to 30 mg) was digested with EcoRV. Digested, genomic DNA fragments were separated on 0.8% agarose gels and then blotted onto membrane and hybridized at 65°C overnight. Blots were probed with a PCR-derived nptII fragment. Membranes were washed twice with 2×SSC (0.15 M NaCl, 15 mM citric acid, and 0.2% SDS) at room temperature and then once with 2×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65°C before film exposure.
Experimental design
The transgenic and its wild type plants (each fifteen) were glasshouse grown under supplementary lighting. Plants were watered as needed and fertilized following the manufacturer's directions. The Lycb-1 and its wild type fruits at mature green, breaker, and ripe stages (Fig. 5) were collected. Immediately upon harvesting, fruit were halved and deseeded, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analysis. Three biological pools of ripe stage fruit were used for the Tom2 microarray analysis, one biological pool was a mixture of four to five individual fruits from three separate plants. For other analysis, at least ten fruits from six plants were cut into small pieces and pooled. One aliquot was used for gene expression analysis, and four technical repeats were performed. Three aliquots of fruit samples were used for metabolism determination.
(A) mature green, (B) breaker, (C, D) ripe.
Statistical tests were performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary NC, USA). Pooled samples were averaged and the dates were analyzed using the Student's t tests, which used to determine significant differences (* p<0.05, **p<0.01) between pairwise comparison of the wild type and the Lycb-1 lines.
RNA extraction
Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA quality was monitored by gel electrophoresis and the measurement of the A260/A280 ratio.
TOM2 microarray analysis
Transcriptomic profiles of Lycb-1 and WT ripe fruit were obtained by using the TOM2 long oligo (http://ted.bti.cornell.edu/) microarray. The analysis included three biological replicates. Total RNA (5 µg) and T7-Oligo (dT)15 (Boya, China) was employed to reverse transcribe double-stranded cDNA, using a DNA Synthesis kit (Promega, USA), and then transcribed into cRNA using the T7 RiboMAX Express Large Scale RNA Production System (Promega, USA). A 2 µg aliquot of cRNA was combined with random primer 9 (New England Biolabs, USA) and 200 µ/µl M-MLV (Invitrogen, USA) to synthesize produce cDNA. Finally, a 2 µg sample of the cDNA was combined with Klenow polymerase (Takara, Japan), random primer 9, and final concentrations of 120 µM dATP, dGTP and dTTP, 60 µM dCTP and 40 µM of both Cy5- and Cy3-dCTP, to produce Cy5/Cy3-labelled cDNA. The labelled cDNA was hybridized overnight with the microarray at 42°C. Subsequently, the arrays were washed with 0.2% w/v SDS and 2×SSC at 42°C for 5 min, followed by washing with 0.2% SSC for 5 min at room temperature. A Printtip Lowess Normalization strategy was applied to normalize the ratio values for each array using the marray package in Bioconductor [39]. The arrays were scanned with a LuxScan 10KA confocal laser scanner (CapitalBio, China), and the resulting images analyzed by ImaGene image analysis software (BioDiscovery, CA, USA). Spots with mean signal intensity below that of the local background plus two standard deviations in both channels were regarded as being empty, and were not included in the statistical analysis. Sequences associated with a false discovery rate of <0.05 and a fold change >2 were considered as representing differentially expressed genes. The microarray hybridization raw data have been deposited at the GEO under accession number GSE33435; we can confirm all details are MIAME compliant. The Tomato Functional Genomics Database (TFGD) (http://ted.bti.cornell.edu/) was used to identify significantly affected biochemical pathways and highly enriched GO terms, as well as the functional classification of differentially expressed genes [40].
Real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Primer pairs were designed to amplify various gene fragments using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The tomato elongation factor 1α (EF-1α) was used as a reference sequence. Each 20 µl reaction contained the relevant primers (one pair directed at the gene target, and one at the reference sequence. Primer sequences given in Table 4) in SYBER GREEN PCR Master Mix (PE Applied Biosystems), and was run on an ABI 7500 Real Time System device (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The reaction profile comprised an initial denaturation of 50°C/120 s and 95°C/60 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C/15 s, 60°C/60 s.
Extraction and quantification of carotenoid, ABA and sugar contents
Carotenoid pigments were extracted and then analyzed using RP-HPLC as described in [41]. Carotenoids were eluted with MeOH-MTBE-H2O [81∶15∶4 (v/v), eluent A] and MeOH-MTBE-H2O [10∶90∶4 (v/v), eluent B] by a C30 carotenoid column from YMC (YMC, Kyoto, Japan). The linear gradient program was performed as follows: initial condition was 100% A to 100% B in 90 min, and back to the initial condition for reequilibration. Carotenoids were identified by their characteristic absorption spectra, typical retention time, and comparison with authentic standards. The HPLC grade β-carotene and lycopene standards were obtained from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA), while phytoene, α-carotene, lutein, and violaxanthin were obtained from CaroteNature (Lupsingen, Switzerland). ABA concentration was determined by LC-MS based on a 1 g sample of powdered fruit, as described in [42] with some modifications. Samples were extracted with 400 µl of 10% methanol containing 1% acetic acid to which internal standards had been added (1 ng of 2H6 ABA), then placed on ice shake for 30 min then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was carefully removed and the pellet re-extracted with 400 µl of 10% methanol containing 1% acetic acid. Following further 30 min incubation on ice the extract was centrifuged and the supernatants pooled. Samples (50 µl) were then analyzed by LC-MS. Soluble sugar content was determined by gas chromatography, based on a 3 g sample of powdered fruit, using a method described in [43]. Three independent extractions were performed per sample.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Southern blots analysis of some of Lycb-1 transgenic plants (EcoRV/NPTII). 1:LYCB1-T017; 2:LYCB1-T018; 3:LYCB1-T020; 4:LYCB1-T023; 5:Marker; 6:LYCB1-T024; 7:LYCB1-T026; 8:LYCB1-T028; 9:LYCB1-T030; 10:LYCB1-T032.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032221.s001
(TIF)
Table S1.
List of the up- and down-regulated genes in Lycb-1 transgenic ripe fruits.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032221.s002
(XLS)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: QX XD. Performed the experiments: FG. Analyzed the data: FG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WZ JZ FG. Wrote the paper: FG.
References
- 1. Ádám AL, García-Martínez J, Szűcs EP, Avalos J, Hornok L (2011) The MAT1-2-1 mating-type gene upregulates photo-inducible carotenoid biosynthesis in Fusarium verticillioides. FEMS Microbiology Letters 318: 76–83.
- 2. Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Boronat A (2002) Elucidation of the Methylerythritol Phosphate Pathway for Isoprenoid Biosynthesis in Bacteria and Plastids. A Metabolic Milestone Achieved through Genomics. Plant Physiology 130: 1079–1089.
- 3. Krishna KN (2000) Safety valves for photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 3: 455–460.
- 4. Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW (2002) Antioxidants in Photosynthesis and Human Nutrition. Science 298: 2149–2153.
- 5. Nambara E, Marion-Poll A (2005) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and catabolism. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56: 165–185.
- 6. Auldridge ME, McCarty DR, Klee HJ (2006) Plant carotenoid cleavage oxygenases and their apocarotenoid products. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 315–321.
- 7. Milborrow BV (2001) The pathway of biosynthesis of abscisic acid in vascular plants: a review of the present state of knowledge of ABA biosynthesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 1145–1164.
- 8. Fester T, Hause B, Schmidt D, Halfmann K, Schmidt J, et al. (2002) Occurrence and Localization of Apocarotenoids in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Plant Roots. Plant and Cell Physiology 43: 256–265.
- 9. Bouvier F, Suire C, Mutterer J, Camara B (2003) Oxidative Remodeling of Chromoplast Carotenoids: Identification of the Carotenoid Dioxygenase CsCCD and CsZCD Genes Involved in Crocus Secondary Metabolite Biogenesis. The Plant Cell Online 15: 47–62.
- 10. Giuliano G, Al-Babili S, von Lintig J (2003) Carotenoid oxygenases: cleave it or leave it. Trends in Plant Science 8: 145–149.
- 11. Tanaka Y, Sasaki N, Ohmiya A (2008) Biosynthesis of plant pigments: anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. The Plant Journal 54: 733–749.
- 12. Mayne S (1996) Beta-carotene, carotenoids, and disease prevention in humans. The FASEB Journal 10: 690–701.
- 13. Wang F, Jiang JG, Chen Q (2007) Progress on molecular breeding and metabolic engineering of biosynthesis pathways of C30, C35, C40, C45, C50 carotenoids. Biotechnology Advances 25: 211–222.
- 14. Ronen G, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Hirschberg J (2000) An alternative pathway to β-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of Beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 11102–11107.
- 15. West CE, Eilander A, van Lieshout M (2002) Consequences of Revised Estimates of Carotenoid Bioefficacy for Dietary Control of Vitamin A Deficiency in Developing Countries. The Journal of Nutrition 132: 2920S–2926S.
- 16. Römer S, Fraser PD, Kiano JW, Shipton CA, Misawa N, et al. (2000) Elevation of the provitamin A content of transgenic tomato plants. Nat Biotech 18: 666–669.
- 17. Fraser PD, Romer S, Shipton CA, Mills PB, Kiano JW, et al. (2002) Evaluation of transgenic tomato plants expressing an additional phytoene synthase in a fruit-specific manner. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 1092–1097.
- 18. D'Ambrosio C, Giorio G, Marino I, Merendino A, Petrozza A, et al. (2004) Virtually complete conversion of lycopene into β-carotene in fruits of tomato plants transformed with the tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) cDNA. Plant Science 166: 207–214.
- 19. Davuluri GR, van Tuinen A, Mustilli AC, Manfredonia A, Newman R, et al. (2004) Manipulation of DET1 expression in tomato results in photomorphogenic phenotypes caused by post-transcriptional gene silencing. The Plant Journal 40: 344–354.
- 20. Wurbs D, Ruf S, Bock R (2007) Contained metabolic engineering in tomatoes by expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes from the plastid genome. The Plant Journal 49: 276–288.
- 21. Apel W, Bock R (2009) Enhancement of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Transplastomic Tomatoes by Induced Lycopene-to-Provitamin A Conversion. Plant Physiology 151: 59–66.
- 22. Lu S, Van Eck J, Zhou X, Lopez AB, O'Halloran DM, et al. (2006) The Cauliflower Or Gene Encodes a DnaJ Cysteine-Rich Domain-Containing Protein That Mediates High Levels of ß-Carotene Accumulation. The Plant Cell Online 18: 3594–3605.
- 23. Yan J, Kandianis CB, Harjes CE, Bai L, Kim E-H, et al. (2010) Rare genetic variation at Zea mays crtRB1 increases [beta]-carotene in maize grain. Nat Genet 42: 322–327.
- 24. Pogson BJ, Rissler HM (2000) Genetic manipulation of carotenoid biosynthesis and photoprotection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 355: 1395–1403.
- 25. Harjes CE, Rocheford TR, Bai L, Brutnell TP, Kandianis CB, et al. (2008) Natural Genetic Variation in Lycopene Epsilon Cyclase Tapped for Maize Biofortification. Science 319: 330–333.
- 26. Diretto G, Al-Babili S, Tavazza R, Papacchioli V, Beyer P, et al. (2007) Metabolic Engineering of Potato Carotenoid Content through Tuber-Specific Overexpression of a Bacterial Mini-Pathway. PLoS One 2: e350.
- 27. Shewmaker CK, Sheehy JA, Daley M, Colburn S, Ke DY (1999) Seed-specific overexpression of phytoene synthase: increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. The Plant Journal 20: 401–412.
- 28. Ducreux LJM, Morris WL, Hedley PE, Shepherd T, Davies HV, et al. (2005) Metabolic engineering of high carotenoid potato tubers containing enhanced levels of β-carotene and lutein. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 81–89.
- 29. Enfissi EMA, Fraser PD, Lois L-M, Boronat A, Schuch W, et al. (2005) Metabolic engineering of the mevalonate and non-mevalonate isopentenyl diphosphate-forming pathways for the production of health-promoting isoprenoids in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3: 17–27.
- 30. Diretto G, Tavazza R, Welsch R, Pizzichini D, Mourgues F, et al. (2006) Metabolic engineering of potato tuber carotenoids through tuber-specific silencing of lycopene epsilon cyclase. BMC Plant Biology 6: 13.
- 31. Romer S, Lubeck J, Kauder F, Steiger S, Adomat C, et al. (2002) Genetic Engineering of a Zeaxanthin-rich Potato by Antisense Inactivation and Co-suppression of Carotenoid Epoxidation. Metabolic Engineering 4: 263–272.
- 32. Zhou X, McQuinn R, Fei Z, Wolters A-MA, Van Eck J, et al. (2011) Regulatory control of high levels of carotenoid accumulation in potato tubers. Plant, Cell & Environment 34: 1020–1030.
- 33. Fraser PD, Enfissi EMA, Halket JM, Truesdale MR, Yu D, et al. (2007) Manipulation of Phytoene Levels in Tomato Fruit: Effects on Isoprenoids, Plastids, and Intermediary Metabolism. The Plant Cell Online 19: 3194–3211.
- 34. Ducreux LJ, Morris WL, Hedley PE, Shepherd T, Davies HV, et al. (2005) Metabolic engineering of high carotenoid potato tubers containing enhanced levels of beta-carotene and lutein. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 81–89.
- 35. Nakajima K, Hashimoto T, Yamada Y (1993) Two tropinone reductases with different stereospecificities are short-chain dehydrogenases evolved from a common ancestor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90: 9591–9595.
- 36. Cheng W-H, Endo A, Zhou L, Penney J, Chen H-C, et al. (2002) A Unique Short-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase in Arabidopsis Glucose Signaling and Abscisic Acid Biosynthesis and Functions. The Plant Cell Online 14: 2723–2743.
- 37. Bird CR, Smith CJS, Ray JA, Moureau P, Bevan MW, et al. (1988) The tomato polygalacturonase gene and ripening-specific expression in transgenic plants. Plant Molecular Biology 11: 651–662.
- 38. Fulton T, Chunwongse J, Tanksley S (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 13: 207–209.
- 39. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, et al. (2002) Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Research 30: e15.
- 40. Joung J-G, Corbett AM, Fellman SM, Tieman DM, Klee HJ, et al. (2009) Plant MetGenMAP: An Integrative Analysis System for Plant Systems Biology. Plant Physiology 151: 1758–1768.
- 41. Liu Q, Xu J, Liu YZ, Zhao XL, Deng XX, et al. (2007) A novel bud mutation that confers abnormal patterns of lycopene accumulation in sweet orange fruit (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 4161–4171.
- 42. Forcat S, Bennett M, Mansfield J, Grant M (2008) A rapid and robust method for simultaneously measuring changes in the phytohormones ABA, JA and SA in plants following biotic and abiotic stress. Plant Methods 4: 16.
- 43. Bartolozzi F, Bertazza G, Bassi D, Cristoferi G (1997) Simultaneous determination of soluble sugars and organic acids as their trimethylsilyl derivatives in apricot fruits by gas-liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 758: 99–107.