Figures
Abstract
Background
Cytosine methylation is one of several reversible epigenetic modifications of DNA that allow a greater flexibility in the relationship between genotype and phenotype. Methylation in the simplest models dampens gene expression by modifying regions of DNA critical for transcription factor binding. The capacity to methylate DNA is variable in the insects due to diverse histories of gene loss and duplication of DNA methylases. Mosquitoes like Drosophila melanogaster possess only a single methylase, DNMT2.
Description
Here we characterise the methylome of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and examine its relationship to transcription and test the effects of infection with a virulent strain of the endosymbiont Wolbachia on the stability of methylation patterns.
Conclusion
We see that methylation in the A. aegypti genome is associated with reduced transcription and is most common in the promoters of genes relating to regulation of transcription and metabolism. Similar gene classes are also methylated in aphids and honeybees, suggesting either conservation or convergence of methylation patterns. In addition to this evidence of evolutionary stability, we also show that infection with the virulent wMelPop Wolbachia strain induces additional methylation and demethylation events in the genome. While most of these changes seem random with respect to gene function and have no detected effect on transcription, there does appear to be enrichment of genes associated with membrane function. Given that Wolbachia lives within a membrane-bound vacuole of host origin and retains a large number of genes for transporting host amino acids, inorganic ions and ATP despite a severely reduced genome, these changes might represent an evolved strategy for manipulating the host environments for its own gain. Testing for a direct link between these methylation changes and expression, however, will require study across a broader range of developmental stages and tissues with methods that detect splice variants.
Citation: Ye YH, Woolfit M, Huttley GA, Rancès E, Caragata EP, Popovici J, et al. (2013) Infection with a Virulent Strain of Wolbachia Disrupts Genome Wide-Patterns of Cytosine Methylation in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE 8(6): e66482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482
Editor: Kostas Bourtzis, International Atomic Energy Agency, Austria
Received: February 11, 2013; Accepted: May 7, 2013; Published: June 19, 2013
Copyright: © 2013 Ye et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Methylation at the cytosine base, which is the most common form of DNA methylation, is present in all vertebrates and flowering plants, some fungi and protozoa and many bacterial species [1]. Methylation is just one of a suite of reversible epigenetic mechanisms including histone modification [2] and small interfering RNA (siRNA) and microRNA [3], that allow for plastic changes in phenotype without a change in genotype [4]. A clear picture of the mode of action of methylation at the molecular level is still emerging. The initial sense was that methylation regulates transcription [5] by silencing promoters [1]. In some taxa, methylation is associated with transposons and so could also play a role in suppressing their activity [6], [7]. More recently it has been shown that methylation is also involved in alternate splicing and hence intragenic sites [8], [9].
The primary agent of cytosine methylation is a family of enzymes called methyltransferases or DNMTs. Insect genomes are highly variable with respect to the presence of these genes due a complex history of both gene loss and duplication [10]. As each of these genes are thought to have different functional roles, insects also vary largely in their capacity for methylation [4]. Drosophila melanogaster for example lacks the enzymes responsible for maintenance (DNMT1) and de novo methylation (DNMT3) [11], but does have DNMT2. This enzyme appears to only methylate DNA randomly with respect to genomic region, with activity peaking in early embryos [12], [13], [14]. It has also been shown to methylate tRNAs [15], [16]. When DNMT2 is knocked out in the fly, there is no clear phenotypic effect [13], [15], [17] although overexpression of the enzyme lengthens fly lifespan [18]. The honeybee genome in contrast harbours all three methylase genes plus a duplicated copy of DNMT3 [10]. Methylation is common throughout the genome and is associated with differential gene expression in castes [8], [19]. Mosquitoes are more similar to D. melanogaster with only DNMT2 present in the genomes of Anopheles gambiae [20] and Aedes aegypti [21].
Wolbachia pipientis is a maternally inherited intracellular bacterium that is found in a wide range of arthropod species including ∼40% of all insect species [22]. Wolbachia induces diverse reproductive abnormalities in its hosts [23]. A virulent strain of Wolbachia, wMelPop, which was originally found to cause early death in D. melanogaster [24] was stably transinfected into A. aegypti and shown to approximately halve the lifespan of its host [25]. A reduced lifespan in mosquitoes could potentially limit transmission of viruses and parasites, as it is often only older mosquitoes that are capable of transmitting these agents because of the time it takes a parasite or virus to migrate from an infected blood meal in the gut to the insect's salivary glands [26], [27]. While the basis of the early death phenotype is not known, wMelPop differs from other Wolbachia strains in that it grows to high densities, particularly in the brain but also in a range of other somatic tissues both its native [24] and novel mosquito host [25], [28]. As mosquitoes carrying wMelPop age they begin to demonstrate a range of abnormalities including increased activity and locomotor defects [29], [30], [31].
Infections with bacterial pathogens have been shown to alter the epigenome of vertebrate hosts [32]. The best-described examples are Helicobacter pylori [33] and uropathogenic Escherichia coli [34] where alterations of methylation profiles are responsible for characteristic changes in host gene expression. Wolbachia infection has also been shown to alter its host epigenetic makeup in a number of recent studies. Histone deposition in the male pronucleus of Wolbachia-infected Drosophila simulans may explain the expression of the symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation, cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) [35]. In D. melanogaster, Wolbachia infection reduces the expression of a histone chaperone gene (Hira) in a manner that correlates with CI expression [36]. In a leafhopper, methylation profiles correlate with the expression of another Wolbachia-induced trait, feminization [37]. Lastly, in A. aegypti, wMelPop infection induces the production of a miRNA that positively regulate a metalloprotease gene. Inhibition of the miRNA or silencing of the target gene led to reductions in Wolbachia density in host tissues [38].
Here, we aimed to describe the methylome of A. aegypti and determine if it is altered by infection with the virulent wMelPop Wolbachia. We found that ∼1000 genes in adult A. aegypti were methylated and that these genes were more likely to exhibit reduced transcription. These genes were enriched for particular biological functional roles that were common to the honeybee and aphid methylome as well. While these findings demonstrated a level of stability in methylation patterns, the wMelPop infection also revealed a capacity for plasticity, with the infection both leading to new methylation events and removal of old signals. Most of these changes appear to be random with respect to gene function as per enrichment analysis and not clearly linked to changes in expression of associated genes. We hypothesise that many of these changes may be non-adaptive and evidence of a “sick” host exhibiting dysregulation of transcription. The only functional category of genes exhibiting enrichment was the GO term membranes (0016020). These methylation changes, if targeted, may reveal virulence associated effects on hosts or more basal aspects of Wolbachia:host interactions common to all Wolbachia. Given that Wolbachia is surrounded by a membrane of host origin [39], manipulating host transport and communication across membranes may represent an evolutionary adaptation to its intracellular habitat.
Methods
Ethics statement
Approval for blood feeding by human volunteers for maintenance of the mosquito colony was granted by The University of Queensland Medical Research Ethics Committee (2007001379). Volunteers provided written informed consent to participate.
Mosquito rearing
Two laboratory lines of A. aegypti were used throughout this study. The PGYP1 line was generated by transinfection with wMelPop and this line was treated with the antibiotic tetracycline and cured from Wolbachia infection to create the PGYP1.tet line [25]. Mosquitoes were reared under standard laboratory conditions (26±2°C, 12:12 light/dark cycle, 75% relative humidity). Mosquito larvae were fed 0.1 mg/larva of TetraMin Tropical Tablets once a day. Adults were transferred to cages (measuring 30×30×30 cm) at emergence at 400 individuals per cage. Adults were supplied with a basic diet of 10% sucrose solution.
Methylation microarrays
Sample collection, preparations and hybridization.
Adult female mosquitoes were collected at 15 days as populations at this point are beginning to experience life shortening [25]. Mosquitoes were collected in pools of 20 and extracted for DNA using DNeasy spin columns (QIAGEN, Australia). Genomic DNA (INPUT, labeled Cy5) was fragmented using restriction enzyme MseI (5′−T▾TAA). Methylated DNA (IP, labeled Cy3) was enriched using an anti 5-methyl cytidine antibody (Abcam plc, UK). IP and INPUT DNA were separately amplified using a whole genome amplification method with universal oligonucleotide primers (WGA2, Sigma Aldrich, Australia) and 4 µg of amplified DNA was sent to Roche NimbleGen Systems for hybridization.
DNA methylation array design, hybridization and analysis.
The DNA methylation arrays were designed and constructed by Roche NimbleGen (Madison, WI, USA). Given the size, it was not possible to tile the entire genome on a single chip. The array consisted of 713,540 custom designed probes of 64–80 bp length that tile the coordinates for regions −1300 bp to +500 bp around the promoter of all 17,416 mRNAs of the A. aegypti genome (retrieved from BioMart in Vectorbase AaegL1.2). Each probe was designed to have a predicted melting temperature of around 76°C. Unique probes were selected whenever possible; repeated masking of up to 10 matches between a probe and the genome was allowed. Three replicate hybridisations were carried out for each mosquito line. Raw signal intensity data was extracted from the scanned images of each array using Roche NimbleGen NimbleScan software and returned for analysis. Each feature on the array had a corresponding scaled log2 ratio, which was the ratio of the input signals for the treatment and control samples. The log2 ratio was scaled to centre the around zero. From the normalized log2 ratio, a fixed-length window (750 bp) was placed around each consecutive probe and a one-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) applied to determine if probes were drawn from a significantly more positive distribution of log2 ratios than those from the rest of the array. The resulting score for each probe is the −log10 p-value from the windowed KS test around that probe. Peaks with at least 2 probes above a minimum P-value cutoff (−log10) of 2 were used for subsequent analysis.
A custom Perl script was then used to identify peaks that were unique to each line. As there are variations between biological replicates of the same line and methylation peaks may start and end at different coordinates, a conservative approach of calling peaks was employed. For a peak to be called, all three replicates of the line needed to have exactly the same starting and ending coordinates for that peak, while no peak was detected in the same region for any of the replicates of the opposite mosquito line. Peaks that were found only in PGYP1 and not in PGYP1.tet were considered to be methylation additions made in the presence of wMelPop. Peaks that were present exclusively in PGYP1.tet line represent removal of methylation in the presence of wMelPop.
Functional annotations of A. aegypti genes were retrieved from Biomart [40] in Vectorbase [41] and analyzed using the Ontologizer software [42], [43]. As functional annotation of the A. aegypti genome is less complete than that of the D. melanogaster genome, we drew on the functional annotations of D. melanogaster orthologs of A. aegypti genes for some of the fine-grained downstream analyses of functional enrichment. D. melanogaster orthologs of A. aegypti genes were retrieved from BioMart in Vectorbase [40], [41]and further analyzed using the online Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [44], [45]. “Transposable element data was obtained from Ensembl genomes release 5. We used the Ensembl querying capabilities of PyCogent [46] to identify transposons located within the annotated coordinates of Aedes aegypti genes. Transposons whose repeat class was specified as “unknown” or “dust” were ignored.
Gene expression microarrays
Experimental design.
Whole-genome microarrays were used to compare gene expression of PGYP1 relative to PGYP1.tet in head and muscle tissues independently using a dual-color reference design. These two tissues were selected for analysis given the particular tropism of wMelPop for brain tissue [24] and because defects in these tissues could underpin the locomotory changes associated with wMelPop [29], [30], [31]. Each tissue type was represented by technical replicates (N = 3) that were then replicated with a dye swap (total N = 6). Microarrays were of the 4×44 K format (Agilent) each containing standard control features and 3 replicates of each 60 mer feature randomly distributed across the layout. The A. aegypti genomic sequence (Vectorbase genome build 1.1) was used for construction of oligonucleotide microarrays using eArray Version 5.0 (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA). After removing probes that cross-hybridized, a total of 12,336 transcripts which represented 12,270 genes were spotted onto each microarray.
Sample collection.
Head and muscle tissues were dissected from 15 day old females into PBS in pools of 20, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and extracted for Total RNA using Trizol (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA). RNA was then purified using RNeasy kits (Qiagen, Australia) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Further sample preparations and hybridizations were then carried out by the Special Research Centre Microarray Facility at the University of Queensland. Sample quality was examined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA). Fluorescent cDNA was synthesized using Agilent Low RNA Input Linear Amplification Kit with Cyanine 3 or Cyanine 5-CTP.
Data analysis.
For each transcript, raw data was extracted and analyzed using Genesping v.9.0 (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA). An intensity dependent (Lowess) normalization (Per Spot and Per Chip) was used to correct for non-linear rates of dye incorporation as well as irregularities in the relative fluorescence intensity between the dyes. Hybridizations from each tissue type were used as replicate data to test for significance of expression changes using the cross-gene error model. The occurrence of false positives was corrected using the QVALUE [47], [48]. All array data have been deposited in ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/microarray-as/ae/) under the accession E-MEXP-2907.
Results
Methylation in theA. aegypti genome
First, we characterised the basic patterns of methylation across the genome of A. aegypti not infected with Wolbachia. In brief, 1007 or 6% of the 16,340 genes represented on the tiling arrays showed evidence of methylation (Table S1), either in the promoter as defined as 1300 bp upstream from start (1.7%), the first 500 bp of the gene (2.2%) or in both regions (2.1%). In 75% of cases where there was methylation in any of these regions, at least one transposon was present in the gene compared with only 54% of cases when methylation was not present. Methylation was also more likely to be associated with genes of longer transcript length (Figure S1). The positive association between methylation and transcript length cannot, however, be explained simply by a greater likelihood of more CpG sites in the sequence, as transcript length in A. aegypti is negatively correlated with GC content of the gene (Figure S2). A test for enrichment by biological function was carried out in Ontologizer 2.0 for the methylated genes with all known A. aegypti genes as a population dataset [42], [43]. As the methylation tiling array contained probes for all known genes this is appropriate. Many of the significant GO terms were associated with ‘regulation’ (modulating the frequency, rate or extent of other processes) and in particular regulation of processes relating to transcription and metabolism (Table 1). Many of these functional classes are also over represented in the methylome of the pea aphid Acythosiphon pisum and the honeybee Apis mellifera [49] (Table 1).
We then examined the transcriptional profiles of A. aegypti (not infected by Wolbachia) using single colour fluorescence data (Cy3) extracted from a range of dual colour experiments on whole mosquitoes [50], [51] and on specific mosquito tissues (this study). Gene regions with methylation were associated with lower levels of gene expression across all datasets (Figure 1), including profiles for adult mosquitoes aged ∼7 and ∼10 days [50], [51] and for head and muscle tissue taken from 15 day old adults (this study). When transcription levels were compared for genes with methylation of the promoter versus the gene (Figure 2), there was no significant difference (t = 1.25, df = 1, P = 0.21).
Gene expression level is measured by fluorescence in single colour arrays for genes that are naturally methylated or unmethylated in A. aegypti. A. Head tissue, this study. B. Muscle tissue, this study. C. [51]. D. [50]. Mann-Whitney U-test, n in parentheses.
Expression as measured by fluorescence in single colour arrays for methylated genes where methylation occurs at the promoter, within the gene, or both.
Wolbachia's effect on host methylation patterns
The presence of wMelPop infection led to the additional methylation of 63 genes in A. aegypti (Table S2). Only 40 of these genes were functionally annotated in A. aegypti, however, providing little statistical power for enrichment analysis. Nonetheless, these genes were compared in the Ontologizer to all annotated A. aegypti genes not already methylated [42], [43]. The top functional categories were membranes (GO:0016020) and calcium ion transmembrane transport (GO:0070588) both with p = 0.069 just beyond significance following multiple test correction. The presence of wMelPop infection was much more likely to be associated with demethylation events in the mosquito genome, affecting 699 genes or associated promoters in total (Table S3). The distribution of methylation loss events was similar between the regions examined: promoters (269), genes (222) or in both simultaneously (208). Of the list of demethylated genes, 347 were functionally annotated in A. aegypti. To test whether wMelPop-associated demethylation was targeted to genes involved with particular functions we identified enriched categories of biological function relative to all annotated genes that were already naturally methylated (536)[42], [43]. Only one GO term, membranes (GO:0016020), was significantly enriched after multiple test correction (p = 0.044). None of the genes assigned to this GO term that were only methylated or demethylated in response to wMelPop showed infection-associated changes in gene expression (Table S4) [51].
To better understand the functional roles of genes ascribed to the GO term category, membranes (GO:0016020) we employed piechart analysis in Panther [52], [53] for all genes affected (either methylated or demethylated) by Wolbachia as a group (Figure 3A). For any GO term (the parent), this analysis reveals the genes representing each of the offspring GO terms or categories that comprise the parent. Of the 56 total genes in our list representing membranes (GO:0016020), the vast majority (29) were more specifically associated with the subcategory of membrane transport (GO:0006810). These 29 genes were mostly associated with only three offspring categories out of a total of 40 possible including; ion (GO:0006811), extracellular (GO:0006858) and protein (GO:015031) transport (Figure 3B). In addition to cellular transport, a large proportion of genes (22) were associated with the category of cellular processes (GO:0009987), comprised almost entirely by genes relating to cell communication (GO:0007154) (Figure 3A).
Pie chart of a further breakdown of the GO group of transport GO:0006810 (B).
Lastly, we also examined the functional annotations for both the A. aegypti genes that undergo wMelPop-associated methylation changes and their D. melanogaster homologs to identify candidate methylation events that might underpin wMelPop-associated phenotypes in insects, including life shortening [24], [25] and defects in locomotory behaviours [29], [30], [31]. In the methylated category, genes of note included odorant receptor genes (AAEL000391, AAEL015506, AAEL011482), ion transporter genes with known effects on muscle contraction, locomotion and heart rate (AAEL013184, AAEL003837, AAEL005014) and genes involved with apoptotic cell clearance or regulation of apoptosis (AAEL012967, AAEL012970, AAEL011751). In the demethylated list, similarly there were genes associated with apoptosis (AAEL006633, AEL003444, AAEL001471), defense response (AAEL014744, AAEL007748, AAEL001932), phagocytosis (AAEL009732, AAEL012836, AAEL005378, AAEL008611), circadian rhythms (AAEL008141, AAEL006411, AAEL012960), lifespan (AAEL011465) and locomotion/flight behaviour (AAEL003608, AAEL014637, AAEL000466, AAEL001457, AAEL005302, AAEL012062, AAEL004717, AAEL006062, AAEL002522). When the transcriptional profiles were examined for these genes for muscle and head tissue (Table S4) or the whole insect [51] expression ratios (Wolbachia infected/uninfected) were not significantly different from one.
Discussion
We have revealed low-level cytosine methylation throughout the A. aegypti genome both in promoters and within genes. Enrichment analysis has indicated that genes exhibiting methylation may be non-random with respect to biological function, with an over representation of regulators of transcription and metabolism. These findings are in contrast to a previous study in Drosophila melanogaster, another DNMT2-only organism, which suggested that methylation may be random in the genome [12], [13]. The two studies differ substantially in their methods, however – genome wide tiling versus random bisulfite sequencing – making direct comparisons difficult. The similarity in the types of genes likely to be methylated across bees, aphids [49] and A. aegypti suggests there may be inheritance of ancestral methylation states and/or strong selection pressure acting on methylation signals. Detailed evolutionary analysis of particular genes would be required to tease apart the relative contributions of these forces. Methylation patterns also change in response to wMelPop infection indicating some potential for plasticity, even in the adult stage. It remains to be seen whether the methylation/demethylation activity documented here is due to the action of DNMT2 or another yet-to-be discovered mechanism for methylation in this insect. The wMelPop-associated changes in A. aegypti methylation are not likely due to the direct action of Wolbachia methylases on host DNA. While experimental verification is needed, the Wolbachia genome contains 2 methylases associated with prophage regions whose annotation suggests they target adenosine not cytosine bases [54].
Environmental factors, including dietary manipulation are known to induce epigenetic changes in animals [55], [56]. A recent study in a pseudoscorpian, Cordylochernes scorpioides has shown that tetracycline alters sperm viability in a fashion consistent with a heritable epigenetic mechanism [57]. Tetracycline treatment is a commonly used approach to create Wolbachia cured lines with minimal genetic differences from infected lines, particularly following transinfection and artificial selection. Further study is needed to determine if CpG methylation is modified by tetracycline and if so whether the phenomenon is genome wide and generalizable to diverse taxa. If so tetracycline cured lines may differ from infected lines and in cases where the cured line has subsequently been introgressed into the Wolbachia infected line, methylome patterns will be manipulated.
The transcription of A. aegypti genes is lower where there is evidence of methylation, and this is independent of whether the methylation occurs in promoters or gene regions. On the whole, these data are in keeping with the idea that methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing [1]. The assumption of a clear relationship between CpG methylation and expression is likely overly simplistic, however, especially given that when we look at the expression of individual genes we do not see consistent patterns of methylation. Here, we have examined only a subset of cis sites, but other potentially relevant sites for transcriptional control are present further upstream of genes, inside exons or inside introns as is thought to be common in insects [4]. The expression of an individual gene may also be regulated in trans at remote sites for transcriptional regulators. Determining which sites matter will require tests of association with and deeper mapping of, sites either by complete genome tiling analysis or intensive gene-specific explorations. Also, if methylation regulates alternate splicing, the basic genome wide transcriptional profiling approaches like those employed here cannot detect and hence test for such differences [8], [9]. Lastly, transcriptional control may also be the result of multiple interacting epigenetic mechanisms including methylation, small or microRNAs [3] and histone modification [2].
This study demonstrates that infection with the virulent wMelPop Wolbachia strain is associated with widespread changes in host methylation. These changes for the most part do not appear to target particular classes of genes. This could be the result of low power with short gene lists, although it is worth pointing out that the increase in gene list size from ∼40 (methylated) to ∼350 (demethylated) did not bring about substantial increases in the number of significant gene categories. It is also possible that many of these genome-wide changes in methylation are not adaptive or specific manipulations by Wolbachia, but simply resulting changes in a sick and dying host. wMelPop-infected mosquitoes by 15 days of age are certainly exhibiting outward signs of their virulent infection including an innate immune response [51], [58], higher death rates [25] and defects in locomotor behaviours [29], [30], [31]. Evidence from other studies suggests that as animals age that their genome wide patterns of methylation become more variable possibly by loss of control of the processes that stabilize methylation [59], [60]. One explanation for wMelPop associated virulence traits is that the insects are simply experiencing accelerated aging. A parallel study in very old A. aegypti not infected with Wolbachia could reveal if there are similar changes in the methylome due entirely to age.
Interestingly, the lists of genes methylated and demethylated with wMelPop infection both showed the strongest enrichment of the same GO term: membranes. The effects of wMelPop on A. aegypti methylation are likely to include some changes that are the result of its unique virulence, particularly in a novel host [51], [61], as well as others that are common to all Wolbachia infections. Given the enrichment of membrane-associated genes, we hypothesize that these may represent the best candidates for fundamental host responses to Wolbachia infections. Inside insect cells, Wolbachia is housed within a membrane that is believed to be of host origin [39] and is the primary point of interaction between symbiont and host. The Wolbachia genome has lost many genes, in particular those involved in biosynthetic pathways, yet has retained a large number of transporters for amino acids, ATP and inorganic ions [62]. The host transport genes whose methylation was affected by wMelPop are mostly associated with inorganic ions, proteins and amino acids. After transport, wMelPop was most likely to affect genes in the cell communication category that was mainly comprised of signal transduction genes. If these methylation changes have phenotypic consequences, it is possible that Wolbachia has evolved a means to manipulate host cell transport and cellular communication to increase its access to nutrients or generally tailor the intracellular environment to its needs. Wolbachia possesses a functional type IV secretion system that could be used to directly influence host methylation [63]. In the first instance, the generality of the methyation changes in membrane-associated genes would need to be demonstrated in the methylome of other insects infected with non-virulent Wolbachia infections such A. aegypti and D. melanogaster infected with wMel. If such changes were present, cell fractionation studies that partition Wolbachia and its vacuole from the rest of the host cell could be used to assess the distribution of ions, amino acids and proteins relative to uninfected cells. Lastly, the ability of Wolbachia to prevent a range of viruses, bacteria and parasites from replicating inside the mosquito cells it occupies has been recently demonstrated [28], [58]. Symbiont-associated changes in the membrane could provide mechanistic explanations for the exclusion.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated the presence of methylation in the A. aegypti genome and that in general methylation status correlates with expression. We have identified similarities between A. aegypti and other insects in the functional classes of genes that are likely to be methylated that may suggest conservation or selection. At the same time, we also provide evidence that the methylome is plastic, changing in the face of infection with a virulent endosymbiont. These disturbances in patterns appear largely random with respect to gene function and do not affect transcription. The only functionally enriched class of genes is that of those involved in transport and communication across membranes which, given the nature of Wolbachia's existence inside a host vacuole, may be a specific adaptation. The phenotypic consequences of these changes in methylation status are not clear and will require in-depth examination of gene expression across more developmental stages and between different tissues in response to diverse Wolbachia strains using methods that can detect alternatively spliced transcripts.
Supporting Information
Figure S1.
Gene region with methylation are associated with greater transcript length as compared to gene regions without methylation. Median transcript length (bp) ± interquartile range for genes whose promoters are naturally methylated or unmethylated in A. aegypti. *** P-value<0.001, n in parentheses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s001
(PDF)
Figure S2.
A negative correlation between GC% content of genes and gene length.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s002
(PDF)
Table S1.
List of naturally methylated genes in A. aegypti. A. aegypti gene ID and description were compiled from Vectorbase [41]. Drosophila melanogaster gene ID and description were compiled from Flybase [64].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s003
(XLSX)
Table S2.
A. aegypti genes that are only methylated in the presence of wMelPop.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s004
(XLSX)
Table S3.
A. aegypti genes that are demethylated in the presence of wMelPop.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s005
(XLSX)
Table S4.
Transcriptional profile of head and muscle tissue of A. aegypti in response to wMelPop infection on each of two different tabs. The occurrence of false positives was corrected using the q-value [48].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066482.s006
(XLSX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: YY MW SO EM. Performed the experiments: YY EC ER JP. Analyzed the data: YY MW GH EM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MW GH. Wrote the paper: YY MW EC ER JP GH SO EM.
References
- 1. Goll MG, Bestor TH (2005) Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Ann Rev Biochem 74: 481–514.
- 2. Lewis ZA, Adhvaryu KK, Honda S, Shiver AL, Knip M, et al. (2010) DNA Methylation and Normal Chromosome Behavior in Neurospora Depend on Five Components of a Histone Methyltransferase Complex, DCDC. Plos Genet 6: e1001196.
- 3. Morris KV, Chan SWL, Jacobsen SE, Looney DJ (2004) Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Science 305: 1289–1292.
- 4. Glastad KM, Hunt BG, Yi SV, Goodisman MA (2011) DNA methylation in insects: on the brink of the epigenomic era. Insect Mol Biol 20: 553–565.
- 5.
Russo VEA, Martienssen RA, Riggs ADe (1996) Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury.
- 6. Bourc'his D, Bestor TH (2004) Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L. Nature 431: 96–99.
- 7. Kato M, Miura A, Bender J, Jacobsen SE, Kakutani T (2003) Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Current Biol 13: 421–426.
- 8. Foret S, Kucharski R, Pellegrini M, Feng S, Jacobsen SE, et al. (2012) DNA methylation dynamics, metabolic fluxes, gene splicing, and alternative phenotypes in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 4968–4973.
- 9. Zhou Y, Lu Y, Tian W (2012) Epigenetic features are significantly associated with alternative splicing. BMC Genomics 13: 123.
- 10. Lyko F, Maleszka R (2011) Insects as innovative models for functional studies of DNA methylation. Trends Genet 27: 127–131.
- 11. Marhold J, Rothe N, Pauli A, Mund C, Kuehle K, et al. (2004) Conservation of DNA methylation in dipteran insects. Insect Mol Biol 13: 117–123.
- 12. Lyko F, Ramsahoye BH, Jaenisch R (2000) DNA methylation in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 408: 538–540.
- 13. Schaefer M, Lyko F (2010) Solving the Dnmt2 enigma. Chromosoma 119: 35–40.
- 14. Gowher H, Leismann O, Jeltsch A (2000) DNA of Drosophila melanogaster contains 5-methylcytosine. EMBO J 19: 6918–6923.
- 15. Goll MG, Kirpekar F, Maggert KA, Yoder JA, Hsieh CL, et al. (2006) Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science 311: 395–398.
- 16. Jurkowski TP, Meusburger M, Phalke S, Helm M, Nellen W, et al. (2008) Human DNMT2 methylates tRNA(Asp) molecules using a DNA methyltransferase-like catalytic mechanism. RNA 14: 1663–1670.
- 17. Kunert N, Marhold J, Stanke J, Stach D, Lyko F (2003) A Dnmt2-like protein mediates DNA methylation in Drosophila. Development 130: 5083–5090.
- 18. Lin MJ, Tang LY, Reddy MN, Shen CKJ (2005) DNA methyltransferase gene dDnmt2 and longevity of Drosophila. J Biol Chem 280: 861–864.
- 19. Elango N, Hunt BG, Goodisman MA, Yi SV (2009) DNA methylation is widespread and associated with differential gene expression in castes of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 11206–11211.
- 20. Holt RA, Subramanian GM, Halpern A, Sutton GG, Charlab R, et al. (2002) The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298: 129–149.
- 21. Nene V, Wortman JR, Lawson D, Haas B, Kodira C, et al. (2007) Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector. Science 316: 1718–1723.
- 22. Zug R, Hammerstein P (2012) Still a host of hosts for Wolbachia: analysis of recent data suggests that 40% of terrestrial arthropod species are infected. PloS One 7: e38544.
- 23.
O'Neill SL, Hoffmann AA, Werren JH (1997) Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms amd Arthropod Reproduction. (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford).
- 24. Min KT, Benzer S (1997) Wolbachia, normally a symbiont of Drosophila, can be virulent, causing degeneration and early death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 10792–10796.
- 25. McMeniman CJ, Lane RV, Cass BN, Fong AW, Sidhu M, et al. (2009) Stable introduction of a life-shortening Wolbachia infection into the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Science 323: 141–144.
- 26. Carlson J, Suchman E, Buchatsky L (2006) Densoviruses for control and genetic manipulation of mosquitoes. Adv Virus Res 68: 361–392.
- 27. Cook PE, McMeniman CJ, O'Neill SL (2008) Modifying insect population age structure to control vector-borne disease. Adv Exp Med Biol 627: 126–140.
- 28. Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu G, Pyke AT, et al. (2009) A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139: 1268–1278.
- 29. Evans O, Caragata EP, McMeniman CJ, Woolfit M, Green DC, et al. (2009) Increased locomotor activity and metabolism of Aedes aegypti infected with a life-shortening strain of Wolbachia pipientis. J Exp Biol 212: 1436–1441.
- 30. Moreira LA, Saig E, Turley AP, Ribeiro JM, O'Neill SL, et al. (2009) Human probing behavior of Aedes aegypti when infected with a life-shortening strain of Wolbachia. PLoS Neglect Trop D 3: e568.
- 31. Turley AP, Moreira LA, O'Neill SL, McGraw EA (2009) Wolbachia infection reduces blood-feeding success in the dengue fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. PLoS Neglect Trop D 3: e516.
- 32. Paschos K, Allday MJ (2010) Epigenetic reprogramming of host genes in viral and microbial pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol 18: 439–447.
- 33. Guo XB, Guo L, Zhi QM, Ji J, Jiang JL, et al. (2011) Helicobacter pylori induces promoter hypermethylation and downregulates gene expression of IRX1 transcription factor on human gastric mucosa. J Gastroen Hepatol 26: 1685–1690.
- 34. Tolg C, Sabha N, Cortese R, Panchal T, Ahsan A, et al. (2011) Uropathogenic E. coli infection provokes epigenetic downregulation of CDKN2A (p16INK4A) in uroepithelial cells. Lab Invest 91: 825–836.
- 35. Landmann F, Orsi GA, Loppin B, Sullivan W (2009) Wolbachia-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility is associated with impaired histone deposition in the male pronucleus. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000343.
- 36. Zheng Y, Ren PP, Wang JL, Wang YF (2011) Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility is associated with decreased Hira expression in male Drosophila. PloS One 6: e19512.
- 37. Negri I, Franchini A, Gonella E, Daffonchio D, Mazzoglio PJ, et al. (2009) Unravelling the Wolbachia evolutionary role: the reprogramming of the host genomic imprinting. P Roy Soc B- Biol Sci 276: 2485–2491.
- 38. Hussain M, Frentiu FD, Moreira LA, O'Neill SL, Asgari S (2011) Wolbachia uses host microRNAs to manipulate host gene expression and facilitate colonization of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 108: 9250–9255.
- 39. Yen JH, Barr AR (1971) New hypothesis of the cause of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culex pipiens L. Nature. 232: 657–658.
- 40. Durinck S, Moreau Y, Kasprzyk A, Davis S, De Moor B, et al. (2005) BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link between biological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 3439–3440.
- 41. Lawson D, Arensburger P, Atkinson P, Besansky NJ, Bruggner RV, et al. (2009) VectorBase: a data resource for invertebrate vector genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D583–587.
- 42. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25: 25–29.
- 43. Bauer S, Grossmann S, Vingron M, Robinson PN (2008) Ontologizer 2.0– a multifunctional tool for GO term enrichment analysis and data exploration. Bioinformatics 24: 1650–1651.
- 44. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4: P3.
- 45. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57.
- 46. Knight R, Maxwell P, Birmingham A, Carnes J, Caporaso JG, et al. (2007) PyCogent: a toolkit for making sense from sequence. Genome Biol 8: R171.
- 47. Storey JD, Dai JY, Leek JT (2007) The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments. Biostatistics 8: 414–432.
- 48. Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9440–9445.
- 49. Hunt BG, Brisson JA, Yi SV, Goodisman MA (2010) Functional conservation of DNA methylation in the pea aphid and the honeybee. Genome Biol Evol 2: 719–728.
- 50. Caragata EP, Poinsignon A, Moreira LA, Johnson PH, Leong YS, et al. (2011) Improved accuracy of the transcriptional profiling method of age grading in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes under laboratory and semi-field cage conditions and in the presence of Wolbachia infection. Insect Mol Biol 20: 215–224.
- 51. Rances E, Ye YH, Woolfit M, McGraw EA, O'Neill SL (2012) The relative importance of innate immune priming in Wolbachia-mediated dengue interference. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002548.
- 52. Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Campbell MJ, Mi H, Diemer K, et al. (2003) PANTHER: a browsable database of gene products organized by biological function, using curated protein family and subfamily classification. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 334–341.
- 53. Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Guo N, Mi H, Campbell MJ, et al. (2006) Applications for protein sequence-function evolution data: mRNA/protein expression analysis and coding SNP scoring tools. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W645–650.
- 54. Saridaki A, Sapountzis P, Harris HL, Batista PD, Biliske JA, et al. (2011) Wolbachia prophage DNA adenine methyltransferase genes in different Drosophila-Wolbachia associations. PloS One 6: e19708.
- 55. Faulk C, Dolinoy DC (2011) Timing is everything The when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics 6: 791–797.
- 56.
Skinner MK, Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C (2010) Epigenetic transgenerational actions of environmental factors in disease etiology. Trends Endocrin Metab 214–222.
- 57. Zeh JA, Bonilla MM, Adrian AJ, Mesfin S, Zeh DW (2012) From father to son: transgenerational effect of tetracycline on sperm viability. Sci Reports 2: 375.
- 58. Kambris Z, Cook PE, Phuc HK, Sinkins SP (2009) Immune activation by life-shortening Wolbachia and reduced filarial competence in mosquitoes. Science 326: 134–136.
- 59. Issa JP (2003) Age-related epigenetic changes and the immune system. Clin Immunol 109: 103–108.
- 60. Thompson RF, Atzmon G, Gheorghe C, Liang HQ, Lowes C, et al. (2010) Tissue-specific dysregulation of DNA methylation in aging. Aging Cell 9: 506–518.
- 61. McGraw EA, Merritt DJ, Droller JN, O'Neill SL (2002) Wolbachia density and virulence attenuation after transfer into a novel host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 2918–2923.
- 62. Wu M, Sun LV, Vamathevan J, Riegler M, Deboy R, et al. (2004) Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: a streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol 2: E69.
- 63. Rances E, Voronin D, Tran-Van V, Mavingui P (2008) Genetic and functional characterization of the type IV secretion system in Wolbachia. J Bacteriol 190: 5020–5030.
- 64. Wilson RJ, Goodman JL, Strelets VB (2008) FlyBase: integration and improvements to query tools. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D588–593.