Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Mediating Role of Mental Adjustment in the Relationship between Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Hematological Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Yingchun Li,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, #39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021, China

  • Ying Yang,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, #39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021, China

  • Rong Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, #39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021, China

  • Kun Yao,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, #39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021, China

  • Zhuogang Liu

    liuzhuogang432@163.com

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, #39 Huaxiang Road, Shenyang, 110021, China

Abstract

Background

Depression is a particularly common psychological disorder that affects cancer patients. Diagnosed with hematological malignancies constitute a serious unpredictable and uncontrollable medical stress situation and patients are susceptible to suffer from depressive symptoms. The aims of the study were to explore the correlation between perceived stress and depressive symptoms in patients with hematological malignancies, and assess the mediating role of mental adjustment between these variables.

Methods

A single center, cross-sectional study was performed by convenience sampling between July 2013 and April 2014 in a hospital of China. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, and Mini-Mental Adjustment Scale, as well as questions about demographic and clinical factors was distributed to 300 hematological cancer patients. Completed questionnaires were received from 227 inpatients.

Results

The results showed that perceived stress was positively correlated with depressive symptoms. The mental adjustment significantly mediated the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms.

Conclusions

Among hematological cancer patients perceived stress may be a risk factor for depressive symptoms, whereas positive coping style might be protective against depressive symptoms. Results showed that medical managers could support the development of mental adjustment in the patients to alleviate psychological disorders.

Introduction

Depression is a particularly common psychological disorder among cancer patients, has a major impact on sleep disturbances, fatigue, treatment adherence, quality of life and cancer survival [14]. Prevalence estimates of persistent depression in cancer patients ranged from 17.6% to 66.72% [5, 6]. More than 850,000 patients were diagnosed with a hematological cancer each year all over the world [7]. Hematological cancers consist of numerous subtypes, from aggressive to chronic, and each subtype differs in its characteristics and rate of progression. Hematological cancer patients always require constant surveillance with intermittent regimens of treatment. Different from solid tumor, the treatment regimens for hematological malignancies are multiple, which include high-dose chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and often urgent, lengthy and aggressive [811]. Previously reported results suggested that depressive symptoms could be explained largely by psychosocial (such as age/gender/ income) and its disease factors (such as types/course/grade of disease) among cancer patients [1214]. However, these factors cannot be intervened in by patients themselves or their medical staff. Meanwhile, the psychological response to this life-threatening disease has not been received enough attention compared with other malignancies, nor are the standards for psychological care in this circumstance well established.

Research has consistently reported that psychosomatic symptoms are caused by stress in neuroscience, biology and psychology [15]. Stress can be considered as the state in which environmental demands or mental strain exceed a person’s regulatory capacity [16].It is reported that acute and chronic stressful life events in early life had substantial influence on the later development of depression [17, 18]. Hematological malignancy is an uncontrollable event, and the treatment outcomes are always unpredictable. This process are risk factors triggering a severe psychological stress, which derives from uncertainty of the future, the sense of life threat, and negative psychological changes [19].

According to the transactional model [20, 21], the process of dealing with stress consists of independent, mediating and outcome variables. Environmental and personality variables, such as the levels of individual’s perceived stress, are causal antecedents of the adaptation to stress events; the individual’s more or less successful adaptation to stress is the outcome. The effect of these independent variables is mediated by the individual’s coping and appraisal. ‘Mental adjustment’ to cancer refers to a patient’s cognitive and behavioral responses to a cancer diagnosis [22]. According to cognitive theory, patients develop depression not only because they have cancer, but also because of how they perceive and interpret their situations [23]. In patients with leukemia and lymphoma, a worse coping style was correlation with severe psychological distress. As demonstrated by Montgomery et al., patients with low scores on the fighting spirit had adjusted poorly to their cancer diagnosis [24]. Some studies also reported that, in women with breast cancer, fighting spirit was found to be the primary coping style used in the non-depression group, while helplessness/hopelessness, anxious/preoccupation and fatalism were the coping styles used the most in the depression group [25, 26].Otherwise, mental adjustment are considered to be probable mediators of the relations between self-efficacy and well-being in cancer patients [27] and have also been found to mediate the impact of other personalities, such as trait pessimism and age, on psychological adjustment [28, 29].

The available literatures identify several variables that directly impact the depressive symptoms by psychosocial factors of individuals with malignant tumor. However, few of studies analyze how different factors mediate the relationship between these variables exist. This leaves a significant gap in the current research base. Analysis of how mental adjustment may mediate the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms, and the actual experience of psychological distress is of great importance to advance the knowledge base and understanding of depressive symptoms for patients with hematological cancer. We have studied 227 hematological cancer patients who were being hospitalized to investigate whether perceived stress correlates with depressive symptoms and whether adjustment styles mediate this association, in a cross-sectional design.

Materials and Methods

Participants

The questionnaires were collected from July 2013 to April 2014 in the department of hematology from Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. This study was approved from the Committee on Human Experimentation of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients who agreed to participate in this cross-sectional study were given an informed consent paper to read and sign. Eligibility criteria concluded that patients a) were at least 18 years old, b) had been clinically diagnosed with hematological cancers, c) have been known their diagnoses, d) were native Chinese speakers, e) have cognitive competence. Patients who were excluded were as follows: patients a) had a history of psychiatric disorders, b) were illiterate to complete the survey, c) had other hematological system diseases or other cancers. Finally, we recruited 300 eligible hematological cancer inpatients into the study and 227 questionnaires were included in analysis. The effective response rate was 75.67%.

Measures

Demographic and clinical variables were completed by a general questionnaire. Demographic variables included age, gender, marriage, education level, income level, residence and payment. Clinical variables were collected by attending doctors according to the medical records such as diagnosis time, disease type, chemotherapy phase, and so on.

Depressive symptoms were assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [30]. The scale consisted of 20 questions and each question was scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from “rarely or none of the time” (0 points) to “most or all of the time” (3 points). The total score ranged from 0 to 60. “Depressive symptoms” were defined as subjects score was of 16 or more. In this study, the Cronbach’s alpha of the CES-D scale was 0.890.

Perceived stress was measured with Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) [31]. The PSS-10 was designed to measure the level of perceived aspects of one’s life which was uncontrollable, overloading, and unpredictable. Each question was on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).The total score could range from 0 to 40. Higher composite scores indicated greater perceived stress. Score of 20 or higher was considered high stress. Chinese version of the scale has also demonstrated good reliability and validity [32]. The PSS-10 has demonstrated good reliability in this study (Cronbach’s alphas = 0.768).

Mental adjustment was assessed with the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale which was developed to measure cognitive and behavioral responses of patients suffering from cancer [33]. It consisted of 29-item with five adjustment styles: Fighting Spirit, Helplessness/Hopelessness, Anxious Preoccupation, Fatalistic, and Avoidance. Chinese Mini-MAC version was mostly considered as three factors structure which could be described as Negative Emotion, Positive Attitude, and Cognitive Avoidance, respectively [34]. In our study, three subscales of the questionnaire showed good reliability (Negative Emotion: Cronbach’s alphas = 0.940, Positive Attitude: Cronbach’s alphas = 0.763, Cognitive Avoidance: Cronbach’s alphas = 0.749).

Statistical methods

We used frequency statistics and t-test or one-way ANOVA to describe distributions of depressive symptoms in categorical demographic and clinical variables. Continuous variables correlation was calculated by Pearson’s correlation analyses. Hierarchical linear regression and asymptotic and resampling strategies were used to test the main study hypotheses. For example, in step1, participants’ demographic and clinical information which were significantly differences in depressive symptoms tested by ANOVA or Pearson’s correlation would be entered as control variables. In step 2, perceived stress was entered if it was correlated with dependents. In step3, negative emotion, positive attitude, and cognitive avoidance which were correlated with dependents were entered. Output results including R2, adjust R2(Adj.R2), R2- changes, F value and standardization regression coefficient(β) were provided in the regression models. All study variables were standardized before hierarchical linear regressions. Asymptotic and resampling strategies were performed to examine the mediation effect which was an increasingly popular non-parametric method of testing mediation effect [35]. In the equations, CES-D score was modeled as the dependent variable, perceived stress as the independent variable, and the subscales of MAC as the mediators. Significant demographic or clinical information such as age was as covariates. The bootstrap estimate presented in our study was based upon 1,000 bootstrap samples. Analyses were conducted using SPSS for Windows (version 17.0) and a p value of 0.05 was set as the level of statistical significance (two-tailed).

Results

Characteristics of subjects

Table 1 showed demographic and clinical characteristics of participants. Average age was 45.48 years old (SD = 16.05), ranging from 18 to 83. The longest course of disease was more than 12 years and the shortest was less than 1 month since diagnosed (median = 4 months). In this study, based on the cut-off values, the overall prevalence of depressive symptoms were 66.1%. The mean values were(20.18±9.65) for depressive symptoms. Independent sample t-test or one-way ANOVA indicated that there were no statistically significant relationships between depressive symptoms and categorical demographic variables, as well as clinical variables (P>0.05).

thumbnail
Table 1. Descriptive information on demographic and clinical characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142913.t001

Correlations among continuous variables

Correlations among continuous variables were listed in Table 2. Depressive symptoms were positively correlated with perceived stress (γ = 0.668, p<0.01), negative emotion (γ = 0.590, p<0.01) and negatively correlated with age (γ = -0.156, p<0.01), positive attitude score (γ = -0.385, p<0.01), and cognitive avoidance (γ = -0.187, p<0.01). There was no significant correlation between course of the disease and depressive symptoms (γ = -0.034, p>0.05).

Hierarchical regression analyses

Independent variables which were related to depressive symptoms in univariate analyses were entered into the hierarchical multiple regression models with adjustment for age. As showed in Table 3, perceived stress was positively associated with depressive symptoms in Step 2. In step 3, negative emotion was significantly and positively associated with depressive symptoms and positive attitude was significantly and negatively associated with depressive symptoms. In addition, the effect of perceived stress on depressive symptoms in step 3 was reduced compared with that in step 2, as indicated by smaller β coefficients.

Mediating effects of psychological adjustment variables

Path coefficients a (perceived stress to negative emotion, positive attitude and cognitive avoidance) and b (direct effects of negative emotion, positive attitude and cognitive avoidance on depressive symptoms), a*b products, BCa95%CI for these products, coefficients c (total effects of perceived stress on depressive symptoms) and c’ (direct effects of perceived stress on depressive symptoms) were presented in Table 4. For the model, perceived stress was associated with negative emotion, positive attitude and cognitive avoidance. Negative emotion and positive attitude were significantly associated with depressive symptoms after controlling for age. They were consistent with the results from hierarchical multiple regressions. Thus, significant mediating effects of negative emotion (a*b = 0.1870, BCa95%CI: 0.1244, 0.2561), positive attitude (a*b = 0.0086, BCa95%CI: 0.0177, 0.0978) on the association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms were demonstrated. The proportion of total effect of perceived stress on depressive symptoms by mediator role was calculated with the formula “(a*b)/total effect “. The proportions of mediating roles of negative emotion and positive attitude were 28.4% and 7.6%, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 4. Mediating roles of psychological adjustment on the depressive symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142913.t004

Discussion

The present study explored the associations between perceived stress, mental adjustment, and depressive symptoms, and further examined the mediating role of mental adjustment. Depression, the psychological state, is more often correlated with cancer. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was 66.1% in this sample group, which was similar to that reported in Chinese cancer patients (66.72%), and higher than Chinese general population sample (33.3%) [5]. Present results supported the assertion that hematological cancer patients might suffer from high rates of depressive symptoms. It is possible that patients with hematological malignancies always suffers from a difficult treatment process and confront the possibility of the disease recurrence [36]. The social and economic factors also make patients perceive great stress, such as poor marital status, unsustainable cost of treatment, and educational attainment [37, 38]. Patients may unable to cope with the continuously strain, associate with more symptoms of psychological disorders, and fall in to a state of depression. The results in this study suggest that there is a need for medical or nursing managers, social workers and psychologists to develop and implement effective measures to alleviate patients’ depressive symptoms and improve their mental health.

Additionally, our results found that perceived stress was positively correlated with depressive symptoms, which was consistent with previous findings [39]. Psychological stress has been identified as a risk factor for psychosomatic symptoms as it may influence psychological health, quality of life, sleep quality, and physical symptoms [3842]. A meta-analysis study has shown that high levels of stress were associated with poorer survival, and high cancer mortality [43]. In this study, the score of the perceived stress scale was similar to breast cancer patients who were after surgery [39]. And 47.6% of patients were considered as experiencing high stress, which perceived stress score was above 20. If individuals were in this range, they might consider learning some stress reduction techniques [44]. Various reasons have been suggested for the experience of mental distress. In addition to the cancer itself as a source of mental stress in cancer patients, the symptoms burden of patients, fear of cancer recurrence, and even quality of life are also among the other contributions to stress [36, 41, 45, 46]. It is the fact that patients who were suffering from cancers feel themselves having a need to cope with the challenge events. Different strategies used to cope with stressful situations would result in different mental outcomes [45]. Our results suggested that perceived stress associated with mental adjustment, which motivated us to explore the indirect effect of perceived stress in predicting depressive symptoms. Otherwise, the results encourage further research and development of preventative care to alleviate perceived stress and depressive symptoms among hematological cancer patients.

Coping style is an important resource of psychological adjustment for cancer patients to combat destructive emotions and stress. Consistent with this, in the present study negative emotions was found to be positively associated with depressive symptoms among hematological cancer patients, and positive attitude was negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Patients with high levels of positive attitude to disease might have more expectation and confidence in adapting to adverse challenge and vice versa [47]. Similar results also found in another research. It was reported that patients who received high score on emotional approaching coping showed an increase in well-being over time [48].

As major part of this research an indirect pathway model was developed to determine if mental adjustment significantly mediated the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms in hematological cancer patients. A multiple regression analysis revealed that mental adjustment partially mediated the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms for patients in the study. In other words, mental adjustment serves as a filter through which perceived stress passes, partially determining whether or not patients will experience depressive symptoms related to the nature of their perceived the level of stress. In practice, this result indicated that mental adjustment partially accounts for the relationship between levels of stress experienced by patients. Importantly, there is a great need for medical or psychological researchers to develop necessary approach to help individuals improve their psychological adjustment, to reduce psychological distress and improve quality of life among hematological cancer patients.

The findings have theoretical and practical implications for health care management. In theory, this study lends to support to the mediated pathway model for analyzing relationships between perceived stress and depressive symptoms for patients with hematological malignancies. And provide theoretical insight into explaining a significant gap that exists in the literature and provides a solid foundation for future research in this area. Practically, our findings highlight that hematological cancer patients are experiencing a high level of depressive symptoms and psychological stress. There is an urgent need for them to explore psychological interventions to encourage patients combating psychological distress by a more positive and active coping style [49]. For example, Silva et al. reported that provide individuals more social support would make them tend to express their negative thoughts and emotions, this self-disclosure induced patients to cognitively process the cancer experience [50].

However, several limitations of this research must be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. First, self-report of participants might lead to response bias from negative affect. Second, the study only explored associations between perceived stress, mental adjustment and depressive symptoms, and examined differences in basic demographic and clinical variables. Other factors associated with depressive symptoms should be investigated in future study. Third, because of the cross-sectional study, we are unable to draw conclusions about cause and impact. Our cross-sectional design was that mental adjustment accounted for a part of the predictive association between perceived stress and depressive symptoms, which was consistent with but not confirm a meditational model. A longitudinal design could be considered to increase the power of the findings. Fourth, our participants came from one treatment center and patients were selected by convenience sampling, so that it may limit the representation of the study.

Conclusions

In our sample, hematological cancer patients suffered from high levels of stress and depressive symptoms. Both perceived stress and mental adjustment were correlated with depressive symptoms and mental adjustment partially mediated the effect of perceived stress on depressive symptoms. Therefore, developed intervention strategies to help patients decrease their depressive symptoms and adopt the right way to cope the stress situation were needed in hematological cancer patients.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Data of hematological caners.

Survey database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142913.s001

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the staff and patients who participate in the investigation.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ZGL. Performed the experiments: YCL. Analyzed the data: YCL YY RZ. Wrote the paper: YCL. Reviewed the manuscript: KY.

References

  1. 1. Daniel L, Kazak AE, Li Y, Hobbie W, Ginsberg J, Butler E, et al. Relationship between sleep problems and psychological outcomes in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and controls. Support Care Cancer. 2015; 1–8.
  2. 2. Sampogna F, Frontani M, Baliva G, Lombardo GA, Alvetreti G, Pietro CD, et al. Quality of life and psychological distress in patients with cutaneous lymphoma. British Journal of Dermatology. 2009; 160(4): 815–822. pmid:19120325
  3. 3. Cohen L, Warneke C, Fouladi RT, Rodriguez MA, Chaoul-Reich A. Psychological adjustment and sleep quality in a randomized trial of the effects of a Tibetan yoga intervention in patients with lymphoma. Cancer; 2004, 100(10): 2253–2260. pmid:15139072
  4. 4. Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Expected long-term survival of patients diagnosed with acute myeloblastic leukemia during 2006–2010. Annals of Oncology. 2009; 21(1):335–341.
  5. 5. Hong JS, Tian J. Prevalence of anxiety and depression and their risk factors in Chinese cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2014; 22(2): 453–459. pmid:24091720
  6. 6. Mashhadi MA, Mansoor S, Zahra Z. Evaluation of depression in patients with cancer in South of Iran (Zahedan). Iran J Cancer Prev. 2013; 6:112–116.
  7. 7. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. 2008. Available: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
  8. 8. Albrecht TA, Rosenzweig M. Management of cancer related distress in patients with a hematological malignancy. Journal of hospice and palliative nursing. 2012; 14(7): 462–468. pmid:23002383
  9. 9. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guidance on cancer services improving outcomes in haematological cancers: the manual. London: National Health Service; 2003.
  10. 10. Hoffbrand AV, Moss PAH, Pettit JE. Essential haematology. Blackwell, Massachusetts; 2006.
  11. 11. Emanuel PD. Introduction to leukocyte neoplasms. In: Rodak BF, Fritsma GA, Doig K (eds) Hematology: clinical principles and applications, 3rd edn. Saunders Elsevier, St Louis Missouri; 2007. pp. 389–397
  12. 12. Bergerot CD, Clark KL, Nonino A, Waliany S, Buso MM, Loscalzo M. Course of distress, anxiety, and depression in hematological cancer patients: Association between gender and grade of neoplasm. Palliat Support Care. 2015; 13(2): 115–123. pmid:24182842
  13. 13. Korszun A, Sarker SJ, Chowdhury K, Clark C, Greaves P, Johnson R, et al. Psychosocial factors associated with impact of cancer in longterm haematological cancer survivors. Br J Haematol.2014; 164(6):790–803. pmid:24372352
  14. 14. Fujisawa D, Temel J S, Traeger L, Greer J A, Lennes I T, Mimura M, et al. Psychological factors at early stage of treatment as predictors of receiving chemotherapy at the end of life. Psychooncology.2015.
  15. 15. Hange D, Mehlig K, Lissner L, Guo XX, Bengtsson C, Skoog I. Perceived mental stress in women associated with psychosomatic symptoms, but not mortality: observations from the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden. International journal of general medicine. 2013; 6: 307. pmid:23650451
  16. 16. Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU. Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  17. 17. D'Angelo B, Wierzbicki M. Relations of daily hassles with both anxious and depressed mood in students. Psychological reports. 2003; 92(2): 416–418. pmid:12785621
  18. 18. De Jonge P, Mangano D, Whooley MA. Differential association of cognitive and somatic depressive symptoms with heart rate variability in patients with stable coronary heart disease: findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Psychosomatic medicine. 2007; 69(8): 735. pmid:17942844
  19. 19. Łosiak W. The process of copying with the stress of disease by patients. In: Kubacka-Jasiecka D, Łosiak W, editors.
  20. 20. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality.1987; 1(3): 141–169.
  21. 21. Lazarus RS, Folkman . Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer; 1984.
  22. 22. Greer S, Watson M. Mental adjustment to cancer: its measurement and prognostic importance. Cancer surveys. 1986; 6(3): 439–453.
  23. 23. Golden WL, Gersh WD, Robbins DM. Depression. Psychological Treatment of Cancer Patients-A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. 1992; 10–27.
  24. 24. Montgomery C, Pocock M, Titley K, Lioyd K. Predicting psychological distress in patients with leukaemia and lymphoma. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2003; 54(4): 289–292. pmid:12670604
  25. 25. Alcalar N, Ozkan S, Kucucuk S, Aslay I, Ozkan M. Association of coping style, cognitive errors and cancer-related variables with depression in women treated for breast cancer. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2012; 42(10): 940–947. pmid:22859828
  26. 26. Tojal C, Costa R. Depressive symptoms and mental adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2015.
  27. 27. Rottmann N, Dalton SO, Christensen J, Frederiksen K, Johansen C. Self-efficacy, adjustment style and well-being in breast cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Quality of Life Research. 2010; 19(6): 827–836. pmid:20401551
  28. 28. Schnoll RA, Harlow LL, Stolbach L L, Brandt U. A structural model of the relationships among stage of disease, age, coping, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 1998; 7(2): 69–77. pmid:9589505
  29. 29. Schou I, Ekeberg Ø, Ruland CM, Sandvik L, Kåresen R. Pessimism as a predictor of emotional morbidity one year following breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2004; 13(5): 309–320. pmid:15133772
  30. 30. Hann D, Winter K, Jacobsen P. Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of psychosomatic research.1999; 46(5): 437–443. pmid:10404478
  31. 31. Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived Stress in a Probability Sample of the United States. In The Social Psychology of Health, eds. Spacapan S. and Oskamp S.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishers; 1988.
  32. 32. Wang Z, Chen J, Boyd J E, Zhang HY, Jia XZ, Qiu JY, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale in policewomen. PloS one. 2011; 6(12): e28610. pmid:22164311
  33. 33. Watson M, Law MG, Santos M, Greer S, Baruch J, Bliss J. The Mini-MAC: further development of the mental adjustment to cancer scale. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 1994; 12(3): 33–46.
  34. 34. Ho SMY, Fung WK, Chan CLW, Waston M, Tsui YKY. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MINI-MAC) scale. Psychooncology. 2003; 12(6): 547–556. pmid:12923795
  35. 35. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods. 2008; 40(3): 879–891. pmid:18697684
  36. 36. Mehnert A, Koch U, Sundermann C, Dinkel A. Predictors of fear of recurrence in patients one year after cancer rehabilitation: a prospective study. Acta Oncologica. 2013; 52(6): 1102–1109. pmid:23384721
  37. 37. Que JC, Sy Ortin T, Anderson KO, Gonzalez-Suarez CB, Feeley TW, Reyes-Gibby CCR. Depressive Symptoms among cancer patients in a philippine tertiary hospital: prevalence, factors, and influence on health-related quality of life. Journal of palliative medicine. 2013; 16(10): 1280–1284. pmid:24047452
  38. 38. Rana M, Kanatas A, Herzberg PY, Khoschdell M, Kokemueller H, Gellrich NC, et al. Prospective study of the influence of psychological and medical factors on quality of life and severity of symptoms among patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015; 53(4): 364–370. pmid:25698550
  39. 39. Wu SM, Yang HC, Thayer JF, Andersen BL. Association of the physiological stress response with depressive symptoms in patients with breast cancer. Psychosomatic medicine. 2014; 76(4): 252–256. pmid:24804879
  40. 40. Wong JYH, Fong DYT. Anxiety mediates the impact of stress on psychosomatic symptoms in Chinese. Psychology, health & medicine. 2015; 20(4): 457–468.
  41. 41. Pulgar Á, Alcalá A, Reyes del Paso GA. Psychosocial predictors of quality of life in hematological cancer. Behavioral Medicine. 2015; 41(1): 1–8.
  42. 42. Lemma S, Gelaye B, Berhane Y, Worku A, Williams MA. Sleep quality and its psychological correlates among university students in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2012; 12(1): 237.
  43. 43. Chida Y, Hamer M, Wardle J, Steptoe A. Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nature clinical practice Oncology. 2008; 5(8): 466–475. pmid:18493231
  44. 44. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior.1983; 24(4):385–396. pmid:6668417
  45. 45. Yilmaz SD, Bal MD, Beji NK, Arvas M. Ways of Coping With Stress and Perceived Social Support in Gynecologic Cancer Patients. Cancer nursing. 2015; 38(2): E57–62. pmid:25122133
  46. 46. Manitta V, Zordan R, Cole-Sinclair M, Nandurkar H, Philip J. The symptom burden of patients with hematological malignancy: a cross-sectional observational study. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2011; 42(3): 432–442. pmid:21477979
  47. 47. He F, Cao R, Feng Z, Guan H, Peng J. The impacts of dispositional optimism and psychological resilience on the subjective well-being of burn patients: A structural equation modelling analysis. PloS one. 2013; 8(12): e82939. pmid:24358241
  48. 48. Batenburg A, Das E. Emotional Approach Coping and the Effects of Online Peer-Led Support Group Participation Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2014; 16(11):e256. pmid:25474819
  49. 49. Shiloh S, Koehly L, Jenkins J, Martin J, Hadley D. Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study. Psycho-Oncology. 2008; 17(8): 746–755. pmid:18615871
  50. 50. Silva SM, Crespo C, Canavarro MC. Pathways for psychological adjustment in breast cancer: A longitudinal study on coping strategies and posttraumatic growth. Psychology & health. 2012; 27(11): 1323–1341.