Figures
Abstract
SLURP-1 is a secreted toxin-like Ly-6/uPAR protein found in epithelium, sensory neurons and immune cells. Point mutations in the slurp-1 gene cause the autosomal inflammation skin disease Mal de Meleda. SLURP-1 is considered an autocrine/paracrine hormone that regulates growth and differentiation of keratinocytes and controls inflammation and malignant cell transformation. The majority of previous studies of SLURP-1 have been made using fusion constructs containing, in addition to the native protein, extra polypeptide sequences. Here we describe the activity and pharmacological profile of a recombinant analogue of human SLURP-1 (rSLURP-1) differing from the native protein only by one additional N-terminal Met residue. rSLURP-1 significantly inhibited proliferation (up to ~ 40%, EC50 ~ 4 nM) of human oral keratinocytes (Het-1A cells). Application of mecamylamine and atropine,—non-selective inhibitors of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, respectively, and anti-α7-nAChRs antibodies revealed α7 type nAChRs as an rSLURP-1 target in keratinocytes. Using affinity purification from human cortical extracts, we confirmed that rSLURP-1 binds selectively to the α7-nAChRs. Exposure of Xenopus oocytes expressing α7-nAChRs to rSLURP-1 caused a significant non-competitive inhibition of the response to acetylcholine (up to ~ 70%, IC50 ~ 1 μM). It was shown that rSLURP-1 binds to α7-nAChRs overexpressed in GH4Cl cells, but does not compete with 125I-α-bungarotoxin for binding to the receptor. These findings imply an allosteric antagonist-like mode of SLURP-1 interaction with α7-nAChRs outside the classical ligand-binding site. Contrary to rSLURP-1, other inhibitors of α7-nAChRs (mecamylamine, α-bungarotoxin and Lynx1) did not suppress the proliferation of keratinocytes. Moreover, the co-application of α-bungarotoxin with rSLURP-1 did not influence antiproliferative activity of the latter. This supports the hypothesis that the antiproliferative activity of SLURP-1 is related to ‘metabotropic’ signaling pathway through α7-nAChR, that activates intracellular signaling cascades without opening the receptor channel.
Citation: Lyukmanova EN, Shulepko MA, Kudryavtsev D, Bychkov ML, Kulbatskii DS, Kasheverov IE, et al. (2016) Human Secreted Ly-6/uPAR Related Protein-1 (SLURP-1) Is a Selective Allosteric Antagonist of α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0149733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149733
Editor: Henning Ulrich, University of São Paulo, BRAZIL
Received: July 30, 2015; Accepted: February 4, 2016; Published: February 23, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Lyukmanova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: The work was partially supported by the Russian Academy of Sciences (Program of Molecular and Cellular Biology), and Russian Foundation of Basic Researches (project № 14-04-00885 issued to VIT, IEK, and DK, and № 16-04-01697 issued to ENL and MAS). The work on affinity purification from cortical extracts and test of antiproliferative activity of rSLURP-1 was done with the support from the Russian Science Foundation (project 14-14-00255 issued to ENL, MAS, MLB, DSK, ZOS, and DAD).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: ACh, acetylcholine; α-Bgtx, α-bungarotoxin; Ls-AChBP, Lymnaea stagnalis acetylcholine binding protein; mAChR, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor; Mec, mecamylamine; nAChR, nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; rSLURP-1, recombinant analogue of human SLURP-1; ws-Lynx1, water-soluble domain of human Lynx1
Introduction
A number of endogenous ligands acting on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) and belonging to the Ly-6/uPAR family were discovered in higher animals [1]. These proteins share structural homology with ‘three-finger’ snake α-neurotoxins, specific inhibitors of nAChRs [1,2]. Some of these endogenous ligands (Lynx1, Lynx2, Lypd6) are membrane-tethered via GPI-anchor and co-localize with nAChRs, thus modulating their functions in the brain [3–6], while others like Secreted Ly-6/uPAR Related Protein-1 and -2 (SLURP-1 and SLURP-2) are secreted proteins [7,8].
Human SLURP-1 was initially isolated from blood and urine libraries [7]. Point mutations in the slurp-1 gene cause the autosomal inflammation skin disease Mal de Meleda [9]. Using recombinant analogue of SLURP-1 it was proposed that SLURP-1 acts as allosteric modulator and potentiates ion currents through α7-nAChRs in the presence of acetylcholine (ACh) [10]. SLURP-1 participates in the regulation of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation, supposedly via interaction with α7-nAChRs, and may function as an autocrine/paracrine hormone in epithelium [11,12]. It was shown that SLURP-1 activates protein kinase signaling cascade resulting in up-regulation of nuclear factor-κB expression in keratinocytes [13]. Expression of SLURP-1 in immune cells and its anti-inflammatory effects on human intestinal epithelial cells and immunocytes have been described [14–16]. Moreover, SLURP-1 is expressed in sensory neurons and might be involved in the cholinergic pain modulation within the spinal cord [17]. Recently, SLURP-1 expression was detected in HT-29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, and the SLURP-1 expression level in these cells was significantly suppressed upon nicotine treatment [18]. Application of a recombinant SLURP-1 analogue to these cells resulted in a significant reduction of cancer cell proliferation [19].
In spite of the growing evidences supporting a modulatory action of SLURP-1 on nAChR function, the current knowledge about the mechanism of SLURP-1/nAChR interactions is very limited. The progress in this field is hampered by the inability to extract sufficient amounts of SLURP-1 from natural sources and difficulties in the production of the recombinant protein with native sequence and structure. The majority of previous works on SLURP-1 were done using fusion constructs containing, in addition to SLURP-1, some polypeptide fragments, e.g. N-terminal SUMO protein, MPB protein, GST protein or C-terminal Myc-tag [10–13,16,20–22]. It was shown previously that the native SLURP-1 isolated from blood (MW 8,842 Da, 81 a.a.) and a recombinant SLURP-1 analogue produced in HEK-293 cells (yield ~ 0.1 mg/l of cell culture) were not glycosylated [7,10]. This fact points to the possibility to use bacterial expression systems for recombinant production of SLURP-1. Previously we developed the high-efficient E. coli expression system for protein analogue with the near-native structure (rSLURP-1, MW 8,974 Da, 82 a.a.) [23]. The only difference of rSLURP-1 from the native protein is the additional N-terminal Met residue appearing due the cloning of rslurp-1 gene into the expression vector, Fig 1A. The relatively high yield of the recombinant production (~ 5 mg of the refolded protein from 1 l of cell culture) allowed us to carry out NMR structural study of rSLURP-1, which ultimately confirmed its structural homology with the ‘three-finger’ snake neurotoxins and Lynx1, another ‘three-finger’ human neuromodulator acting on nAChRs (Fig 1A) [23].
(A). Amino acid sequence alignment of human SLURP-1, SLURP-2, ws-Lynx1, and non-conventional toxin WTX from N. kaouthia. Cysteine residues are labeled in gray, and the disulfide linkages are shown; additional N-terminal Met residues are underlined. (B). Influence of rSLURP-1 (diamonds) and ws-Lynx1 (squares) on cell growth. Each point is mean ± S.E. of six independent experiments. The Hill equation (Eq 1) was fitted to rSLURP-1 data (% of control) for each of the six experiments independently. After averaging the following values for EC50, nH and A1 were obtained 4.3 ± 0.6 nM, 1.4 ± 0.2 and 59.5 ± 1.3% (mean ± S.E., n = 6). (C). Effects of rSLURP-1 (1 μM), atropine (1 μM), Mec (10 μM), α-Bgtx (1 μM), polyclonal antibodies against α7 (IgG-α7, 1 μg per 50 μl), and their co-application. Each bar is mean ± S.E. of 4–6 independent experiments. ** and *** indicate significant (p<0.01 and p<0.001, t-test) differences.
Here we describe functional properties of rSLURP-1. Our data provide a new insight into the mechanism of SLURP-1 action and reveal some discrepancies with the results of previous studies obtained using SLURP-1 analogues with non-native sequences. For example, our findings demonstrate that SLURP-1 acts on α7-nAChRs as an allosteric antagonist and interacts with the receptor outside the classical ligand-binding site.
Materials and Methods
Water-soluble domain of human Lynx1 (ws-Lynx1), rSLURP-1, and rSLURP-2 were produced in E. coli as described in [19, 23, 24]. The purity and homogeneity of the recombinant proteins were confirmed by SDS-PAGE, HPLC, and MALDI-MS. The disulfide bonds formation was confirmed in the reaction with the Ellman’s reagent (5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). The correct spatial structure for each batch of produced proteins was confirmed by NMR-spectroscopy.
Experiments with Het-1A cells
Human Het-1A squamous esophageal cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CRL-2692). Cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in BEBM media (Lonza/Clonetics Corporation) according to ATCC recommendations. Culture flasks and plates were precoated with a mixture of 0.01 mg/mL fibronectin, 0.03 mg/mL bovine collagen type I and 0.01 mg/mL bovine serum albumin dissolved in culture medium. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (1×104 cells per well), and 24 h later the analyzed compounds were added to cells. Next, cells were incubated for 48 h, examined under microscope, and characterized using WST-1 assay and fluorescent Hoechst/propidium iodide assay as described elsewhere [19,25]. Hoechst/propidium iodide assay allows evaluation of cell viability by staining all cell nuclei with Hoechst 33342 and dead cell nuclei with propidium iodide. For inhibition of nAChRs and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), 1 h preincubation of keratinocytes with 1 μM α-bungarotoxin (α-Bgtx, Tocris), 10 μM mecamylamine hydrochloride (Mec, Sigma), 1 μM atropine (Sigma), or 1 μg per 50 μl anti-α7-nAChR antibody (#ab10096, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was performed before rSLURP-1 application. Antibodies at the same concentration were additionally added to the cells after 24 and 40 hours of incubation with rSLURP-1.
Affinity purification
Human temporal neocortical tissue was obtained from an anterior temporal lobectomy performed in two patients (females, age 30, and 44) with medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal onset. Written informed consent was obtained before surgery. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee in the Capital Region of Denmark (H-2-2011-104) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The tissue was immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until use. The neuropathological examinations of the neocortex revealed no abnormalities.
rSLURP-1 was dissolved to 2 mg/ml in distilled H2O at 4°C for 48 hours after which it was coupled to PureProteome NHS Flexibind magnetic beads (Millipore, Billerica, MA) in a ratio of 1:2 (vol/vol) using the manufacturer’s instructions. Successful coupling was confirmed by subsequent protein determination showing a substantial decrease in the protein content of the applied rSLURP-1 solution. Another batch of beads was processed in parallel, but using PBS devoid of rSLURP-1, as a negative control. The beads were incubated in PBS supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum (pH 7.4, 1 hour at 4°C) prior to use.
The brain tissue was lysed in 1 ml lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 μl/ml protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, pH 7.5) using a PT1200C polytron blender (Kinematica, Luzern, Switzerland) for 20 seconds. The lysate was centrifuged 30 minutes at 160,000×g at 20–22°C using an airdriven ultracentrifuge (Airfuge, Copenhagen, Denmark), and the supernatant discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml lysis buffer containing 2% Triton X-100 by blending for 20 seconds, and incubated 2 hours at 4°C on a rotor (15 rpm). Thereafter, the sample was centrifuged as above and the resulting supernatant was used for affinity purification. Total protein content was determined using the Pierce 660 nm Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL), and the protein (0.7–1.0 mg) was incubated with 50 μl magnetic beads in a total volume of 1.5 ml lysis buffer for 18–22 h at 4°C on a vertical rotor (15 rpm). The magnetic beads were separated using PureProteome Magnetic Stand (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Subsequently, the beads were washed twice in 1 M NaCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 7.5 and three times in 0.1 M NaCl, 8 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 7.5 and immediately processed for Western blotting.
Western blotting
Total protein content was measured using a DC Protein Assay Kit (Biorad, Hercules, CA). Amounts of lysates containing equal protein content were then diluted in loading buffer (120 mM Tris, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 10% (v/v) mercaptoethanol, 4% (w/v) SDS, 0.05% (w/v) bromophenol blue, pH 6.8), incubated for 10 minutes at 95°C, submitted to gel electrophoresis in AnykD gel (Biorad), and blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (BioRad). Membranes were washed in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) and blocked in TBS containing 5% (w/v) dry milk powder, which was also used for antibody incubations. Incubation with primary antisera directed against β2 (1:1,000, provided by Dr. Cecilia Gotti), α3, α4, α5, α6, 5-HT3 (1:100 #sc-1771, sc-5591, sc-28795, sc-27292, sc-28958 Santa Cruz Biotechnology), α7, β4 (1:1,000 #ab23832 and 1:100 #ab156213 Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was performed overnight at 4°C on parafilm in a humidified container, followed by 3×10 minute washes in TBST and 1 h incubation at 21°C with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,000, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). After thorough washing in TBST, enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents (Western Lightning ECL Pro, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA) were used for signal detection and protein bands were visualized using a Chemidoc XR digital image analyser (Biorad).
Electrophysiology
Wild-type mature female Xenopus laevis toads were purchased from Xenopus Express (France) and were treated according to guidelines of local bioethics committee. Each Xenopus laevis oocyte was injected with 2 ng of human α7 nAChR cDNA. Two-electrode voltage-clamp recordings were performed after 48–72 h of incubation at 18°C, followed by 1–7 days incubation at 4°C. Membrane potential was clamped at -60 mV, all recordings were performed using a hand-made chamber of 25 μL volume provided by Dr. C. Methfessel (Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany). Short 10 second pulses of ACh were applied to a receptor expressing oocyte each 5 minutes followed by washing out with control buffer after each pulse. To determine rSLURP-1 functional activity, we either performed 3 minute preincubation with rSLURP-1 or co-applied rSLURP-1 with ACh.
Analysis of binding at α7-nAChRs through competition with 125I-α-Bgtx.
The tested amounts of rSLURP-1 (from 1 nM to 100 μM) were preincubated 3 h with the GH4Cl cells transfected with human α7 type nAChR (a gift of Eli Lilly Company) or with the Lymnaea stagnalis acetylcholine binding protein (Ls-AChBP, a gift from Prof.T. Sixma); final concentration of toxin-binding sites was 0.4 or 2.4 nM, respectively. Binding with the GH4C1 cells was carried out in 50 μl of 20 mM Tris/HCl buffer containing 1 mg/ml of BSA, pH 8.0, and with the Ls-AChBP—in 50 μl of binding buffer (PBS, containing 0.7 mg/ml of BSA and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.5) at 25°C. Next, 125I-α-Bgtx (~ 2000 Ci/mmol) was added to a final concentration of 0.2 nM for 5 min followed by filtration of a reaction mixture on GF/C filters (Whatman, Maidstone) presoaked in 0.25% polyethylenimine (for cells) or on double DE-81 filters (Whatman) presoaked in binding buffer (for Ls-AChBP). Unbound radioactivity was removed from the filters by washes (3×3 ml) with the respective incubation buffer. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of 10 μM α-cobratoxin (3 h preincubation).
Analysis of the dose-response curves
The influence of rSLURP-1 on viability of Het-1A cells, on ion currents through α7-nAChRs expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and on the binding of 125I-α-Bgtx to Ls-AChBP was fitted by the Hill equation:
(eq. 1)
, where [rSLURP1] is the rSLURP-1 concentration, IC50 is concentration where half-maximal inhibitory effect is achieved, nH is Hill coefficient, and the data (y) and the amplitude of the effect (A1) are expressed in the % of control.
Results
rSLURP-1 down-regulates keratinocyte proliferation
Incubation of Het-1A cells (immortalized line of human oral keratinocytes) with 1 μM rSLURP-1 for 48 h resulted in a significant decrease in the cell number up to 60 ± 2% relative to the control (Fig 1B). To discriminate between cytotoxicity and reduced proliferation, we performed additional microscopic examination of cells in plate wells and measured their viability with the Hoechst/propidium iodide assay. A decrease in the cell density was clearly observed, whereas morphology of most cells was not disturbed as compared to control (data not shown). Hoechst/propidium iodide assay did not reveal an increase in the fraction of dead cells even at the highest tested concentrations of rSLURP-1 (10 μM): 4 ± 1% of dead cells for both rSLURP-1 treated cells and in control. Therefore, rSLURP-1 affects Het-1A cells by reducing their proliferation. Analysis of the dose-response curve revealed a concentration-dependent mode of action for rSLURP-1 with an EC50 of 4.3 ± 0.6 nM (Fig 1B). For comparison, we analyzed cell growth in the presence of ws-Lynx1, another endogenous Ly-6/uPAR protein acting on nAChRs [26,27], at concentrations up to 1 μM (Fig 1B). No reduction in the number of cells was observed with ws-Lynx1.
To distinguish the effects of rSLURP-1 caused by possible interactions with nAChRs and mAChRs (both types of receptors are presented in keratinocytes [28]), we measured the antiproliferative activity of rSLURP-1 in the presence of a non-specific blocker of the nAChRs, Mec, and a non-specific antagonist of mAChRs, atropine (Fig 1C). We found that Mec did not influence cell growth per se, but completely inhibits the antiproliferative effect of rSLURP-1. Contrarily, atropine neither affected cell growth per se, nor inhibited the effect of SLURP-1. Incubation of keratinocytes with α-Bgtx (a competitive antagonist of muscle type, α7 and α9 nAChRs) also did not affect the cell growth and antiproliferative effects of rSLURP-1 (Fig 1C). To further investigate role of α7 nAChRs in the antiproliferative action of rSLURP-1 we measured the protein activity in the presence of anti-α7-nAChRs antibodies. It was found that application of anti-α7 antibodies did not influence cell growth, but significantly inhibits the antiproliferative activity of rSLURP-1 (the relative number of viable cells was increased from ~60% to ~85%, see Fig 1C).
rSLURP-1 selectively binds to the α7 nAChR subtype in the human cortical extracts
According to previous measurements cultured keratinocytes contain relatively low number of nicotinic receptors [28]. Therefore to study the pharmacological profile of rSLURP-1 we chose other model system with larger receptor density, namely the extracts from temporal cortex. We performed affinity purification of different nAChR subunits from the extracts of the human temporal cortex using rSLURP-1 coupled to magnetic beads, followed by detection of nAChR subunits. rSLURP-1 isolated α7 nAChR subunits, but did not isolate the α3, α4, α5, α6, β2, or β4 subunits (Fig 2). Moreover bead-coupled rSLURP-1 did not isolate subunits of the closely related 5-HT3 receptor. None of the subunits were detected when the affinity purification was performed using non-coupled beads, confirming that isolation of α7 nAChR subunits was not attributable to a non-specific interaction with the beads.
Affinity purification was performed using magnetic beads covalently coupled with rSLURP-1 or non-coupled beads (Ctrl) on human temporal cortical homogenates (n = 2). Samples were submitted to gel electrophoresis and Western blotting along with samples of the homogenate used for affinity purification (Input) and the remaining homogenate after affinity purification (Output) followed by detection of nAChR subunits.
rSLURP-1 non-competitively inhibits ACh-evoked currents in α7 type nAChRs
To characterize rSLURP-1 action, electrophysiological recordings were performed on Xenopus oocytes expressing human α7 type nAChRs in the absence and presence of 200 pM– 40 μM rSLURP-1 (Fig 3). At micromolar concentrations rSLURP-1 reduced ACh responses up to ~ 30% of control (IC50 = 1.1 ± 0.5 μM, Fig 3A and 3B). The inhibitory activity of 5 μM rSLURP-1 was tested using different ACh concentrations (1 μM– 1 mM, Fig 3C). Application of rSLURP-1 did not evoke currents in the absence of ACh. There was no detectable current amplitude reduction at low ACh concentrations, but it became significant (p<0.05, t-test) starting from 100 μM of ACh. This activity resembles the previously described inhibitory activity of ws-Lynx1 which effect also was more pronounced in the presence of high ACh concentration [26]. The direct comparison of the influence of 5 μM ws-Lynx1 and rSLURP-1 on the currents evoked by 1 mM ACh revealed similar level of inhibition (~ 50%, Fig 3C). Moreover, application of rSLURP-1 (1 μM) did not shift ACh dose-response curve revealing absence of competition between rSLURP-1 and ACh (Fig 3D). This strongly suggests that rSLURP-1 reduces ACh-evoked current amplitude in a manner consistent with an allosteric mode of action.
(A). Electrophysiological recordings of α7 nAChR inhibition by 13 μM rSLURP-1. Currents were obtained in response to 20 seconds 100 μM ACh pulses (horizontal bars). Inhibition of current amplitude was observed after 5 min pre-incubation with 13 μM rSLURP-1. Vertical bar represents current scale (500 nA). (B). Dose-response curve of 1 mM acetylcholine-evoked current by rSLURP-1. Each point is mean ± S.E. of independent measurements on three oocytes. The Hill equation (Eq 1) was fitted to normalized data (% of control) for each of the three experiments independently. After averaging the following values for IC50, nH and A1 were obtained 1.1 ± 0.5 μM, 1.4 ± 0.3 and 31 ± 3% (mean ± S.E., n = 3). (C). Dependence of 5 μM rSLURP-1 effect at α7-nAChR on ACh concentration. Data of rSLURP-1 induced inhibition is shown by filled squares, 5 μM ws-Lynx1 effect on 1 mM ACh is shown by circle. Asterisks indicate significant (p<0.05, t-test) difference from receptor inhibition by rSLURP-1 at 1 μM ACh (6 on plot). (D). Dose-response curves of acetylcholine-evoked current amplitudes in the absence (dotted line, empty circles) and presence (solid line, filled circles) of 1 μM rSLURP-1. The calculated parameters EC50 and nH were 232 ± 25 μM and 1.9 ± 0.3 in absence of rSLURP-1, and 214 ± 60 μM and 2.2 ± 0.3 in presence of rSLURP-1 (mean ± S.E., n = 3).
rSLURP-1 does not compete with 125I-α-Bgtx for binding to human α7 type nAChRs
Previously, we demonstrated rSLURP-1 competition with 125I-α-Bgtx for binding to the muscle type nAChR from Torpedo californica with IC50 of 54 ± 15 μM (Fig 4A) [23]. Here the competition experiments with 125I-α-Bgtx yielded an IC50 of 4.8±0.9 μM for rSLURP-1 binding to Ls-AChBP, a structural homolog of the ligand-binding domain of nAChRs (Fig 4A). However, in case of human α7-nAChRs overexpressed in the GH4C1 cell line, no competition with 125I-α-Bgtx was detected for rSLURP-1 at concentration from 1 nM to 100 μM (Fig 4B). For comparison, the displacement of radioactive 125I-α-Bgtx by non-labeled α-Bgtx from α7-nAChRs in the GH4C1 cells is shown in the Fig 4B.
(A). Each point is mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. The Hill equation (Eq 1, with A1 = 0%) was fitted to normalized Ls-AChBP and T. californica data (% of control binding) for each of the three experiments independently. After averaging the following values for IC50 and nH were obtained 4.8 ± 0.9 μM and 0.92 ± 0.17 for Ls-AChBP, and 54 ± 15 μM and 1.3 ± 0.3 for T. californica nAChR (mean ± S.E., n = 3). Data for T. californica were taken from [23]. (B). Displacement of 125I-α-Bgtx by unlabeled Bgtx and rSLURP-1 from α7-nAChR in the GH4C1 cells. (C). Affinity purification of α7-nAChR subunit was performed using magnetic beads covalently coupled with rSLURP-1, rSLURP-2, and α-Bgtx or non-coupled beads (control) on GH4C1 cells overexpressing α7-nAChR (n = 2). The 40 μl samples of GH4C1 cells with final concentration of α-Bgtx-binding sites of 0.4 nM were used. The blots were analyzed by densitometry using ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
To confirm the binding of rSLURP-1 to α7-nAChRs overexpressed in the GH4C1 cells, we performed affinity purification of α7-nAChR subunits using rSLURP-1 coupled to magnetic beads. For comparison the magnetic beads with attached α-Bgtx and rSLURP-2 were also used. It was found that all three proteins are able to extract α7 subunit from GH4C1 cells with relative activity in the order α-Bgtx > rSLURP-2 ≥ rSLURP-1 (Fig 4C).
Discussion
The progress in molecular biology and studies of ligand-receptor interactions in particular is tightly coupled with the ability to produce recombinant analogues of the proteins which otherwise could not be obtained from natural sources in sufficient amounts [29,30]. Frequently, the recombinant proteins differ from the native ones and contain cloning artifacts, stabilizing mutations, purification tags, or non-native glycosylation patterns. These ‘modifications’ could affect the functional and structural properties of a studied protein.
It has been demonstrated that the hybrid protein SUMO-SLURP-1 (MW ~ 22 kDa) inhibited proliferation of oral keratinocytes (Het-1A cells) [12], and that a recombinant SLURP-1 analogue containing an unprocessed N-terminal signal peptide (103 a.a., MW ~ 11 kDa, [22]) induced upregulation of nuclear factor-κB gene expression in keratinocytes [13]. Moreover, the transfection of Het-1A cells with siRNA-α7 or inhibition of the α7-nAChRs with selective antagonist methyllycaconitine has resulted in the disappearance of the effects induced by this SLURP-1 analogue [13]. As a result of above mentioned studies Grando et al have proposed that the effects of native SLURP-1 on keratinocytes could be mediated by agonistic interaction with α7-nAChRs [12,13].
In agreement with these findings, we also observed inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation by rSLURP-1 (Fig 1, 82 a.a., MW 8,974 Da). We further demonstrated that the effect of rSLURP-1 was concentration-dependent with pronounced antiproliferative activity at nanomolar concentrations (EC50 of ~4 nM, Fig 1B). The incubation of keratinocytes with anti-α7-nAChRs antibodies significantly diminished the rSLURP-1 activity (Fig 1C). However, the preincubation of the cells with α-Bgtx (selective antagonist of α7-nAChRs) did not influence the rSLURP-1 antiproliferative effect (Fig 1C). This discrepancy forced us to investigate in details the SLURP-1 interaction with its potential molecular targets.
There are two classes of acetylcholine receptors participating in cholinergic signaling: nicotinic receptors, which are ligand-gated ion channels, and muscarinic receptors, which are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Keratinocytes express both types of acetylcholine receptors [28]. Some structural homologues of SLURP-1, e.g. non-conventional ‘three-finger’ snake toxin WTX [31] and ws-Lynx1 [26] (Fig 1A), are able to interact with both classes of receptors, nAChRs and mAChRs. Therefore we decided to study whether SLURP-1 displays similar functional dualism. Analysis of the rSLURP-1 antiproliferative effect in the presence of Mec and atropine,—non-selective inhibitors of nAChRs and mAChRs, respectively, revealed nicotinic receptors as a rSLURP-1 target in keratinocytes (Fig 1C).
To further characterize the potential targets of rSLURP-1 we performed affinity purification of different nAChR subunits using the bead-coupled ligand. Due to a low expression of nicotinic receptors on keratinocytes [28] we used a different tissue: cortical extracts from the human brain. Using this approach we demonstrated for the first time that rSLURP-1 exclusively binds to α7 nAChR subunit (Fig 2). This is strikingly different from the selectivity pattern of ws-Lynx1. In similar experiments, ws-Lynx1 demonstrated the interaction with α3, α4, α5, α6, α7, β2 and β4 nAChR subunits [32]. Thus, our results highlight an exclusive targeting by SLURP-1 of α7 nAChRs.
Electrophysiology experiments revealed that rSLURP-1 diminishes the current amplitudes of α7-nAChRs expressed in Xenopus oocytes, with quite low efficiency (IC50 of ~1 μM). Notably, the inhibitory effect of rSLURP-1 is increased with increasing ACh concentrations (Fig 3). Enhancement of rSLURP-1 effect in the presence of high agonist (ACh) concentrations is consistent with open channel block (the more receptors are activated by agonist, the more of them are inhibited by rSLURP-1). At the same time the direct blockage of the α7-nAChR channel by large ‘three-finger’ molecule seems to be sterically impossible. The similar ‘blocker-like’ behavior is not unusual for the nAChR ligands. The well-known nAChR inhibitor d-tubocurarine also has activity of open-channel blocker [33], nevertheless only intersubunit binding sites at the extracellular part of the receptor have been identified so-far [34]. The non-complete (up to ~ 70%) inhibition of the ACh-evoked currents observed at the high concentrations of rSLURP-1 argues in favor of allosteric mode of interactions with the receptor. We therefore hypothesize that SLURP-1 acts as an allosteric modulator preventing hyperactivation of Ca2+-conducting α7-nAChRs thus protecting Ca2+-dependent signaling pathways from undesirable activation.
It has been previously reported that a SLURP-1 variant with a C-terminal Myc-tag acted on α7-nAChRs at nanomolar concentrations by increasing their current amplitudes [10]. Here we did not observe an enhancement of current amplitudes by application of rSLURP-1 over a wide range of concentrations (Fig 3B). This discrepancy could be explained by the sequence difference of the SLURP-1 variants. The Myc-tag consists of 10 residues (EQKLISEEDL), and five of them are charged. The involvement of long C-terminal tail of the ‘three-finger’ snake α-neurotoxins in the interaction with α7-nAChRs has been previously described [35,36]. It is therefore possible that this relatively long negatively charged C-terminal sequence influences the properties of SLURP-1 and the mode of interaction with the receptor.
We observed competition between rSLURP-1 and α-Bgtx for binding to muscle type nAChR and AChBP (Fig 4A, [23]). These data suggest that the rSLURP-1 binding site at least partially overlaps with the α-neurotoxin binding sites on these targets. Contrary to that, no rSLURP-1 competition with α-Bgtx for binding with α7-nAChRs was detected in GH4C1 cells overexpressing these receptors (Fig 4B). At the same time, the affinity purification revealed that rSLURP-1 binds to α7-nAChR subunit in these cells although with lower affinity than α-Bgtx (Fig 4C). The affinity of rSLURP-1 to α7-nAChR subunit was comparable or slightly less than affinity of rSLURP-2. Taking in to account that rSLURP-2 acts on α7-nAChRs at nanomolar concentrations (Lyukmanova et al, unpublished data) we could not exclude that the rSLURP-1 also has nanomolar affinity to α7-nAChRs.
The absence of competition between rSLURP-1 and ACh was revealed by electrophysiology on Xenopus oocytes expressing α7-nAChRs (Fig 3D). Taken together with data obtained on α7-nAChRs overexpressed in GH4C1 cells, these findings demonstrate that rSLURP-1 binds to α7-nAChRs outside the classical agonist/antagonist binding site. Similar results have been recently reported for ws-Lynx1, which at concentration of 10 μM inhibited currents through α7, α4β2, and α3β2 receptors, but did not compete with 125I-α-Bgtx and 3H-epibatidine for binding to α7- and α4β2-nAChRs at concentrations up to 30 μM [26].
Several effects could be responsible for the observed two-order of magnitude difference in the effective rSLURP-1 concentrations in various assays (~ 4 nM for inhibition of keratinocytes proliferation and ~1 μM for suppression of ionic currents at α7-nAChRs). First of all, we cannot exclude the possibility that α7 receptors of keratinocytes have different properties from the receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. For instance, the observed difference could arise from complex interactions of rSLURP-1 with various states of α7-nAChR in keratinocytes (coupled, uncoupled, desensitized etc.). However, the provocative idea that the inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation by rSLURP-1 is not connected with the modulation of ionic currents through the Ca2+-conducting α7-nAChRs seems also possible. This hypothesis is supported by the absence of antiproliferative activity of the nAChR inhibitors (Mec and α-Bgtx, Fig 1C) and of ws-Lynx1, which demonstrates modulatory activity on α7-nAChR currents that is comparable to that of rSLURP-1 (Figs 1B and 3C). We could hypothesize that rSLURP-1 activity in keratinocytes is related to ‘non-classical’ signaling pathway through α7-nAChR, that activates intracellular signaling cascades without opening the receptor channel (metabotropic type of signaling). It is possible that SLURP-1 has two different binding sites on α7-nAChR, and that binding to the ‘high-affinity’ site mediates metabotropic type of signaling, whereas biding to the ‘low-affinity’ site is responsible for the regulation of ion flow through the receptor channel. This would explain the responses of keratinocytes to co-application of SLURP-1 with different α7-nAChR inhibitors: the non-specific blocker of nAChR Mec inhibits both metabotropic and ionotropic pathways, while competitive antagonist α-Bgtx blocks only ionotropic events and thus does not influence rSLURP-1 antiproliferative activity. The inhibition of the rSLURP-1 antiproliferative effect by anti-α7-nAChR antibodies could be explained by sterical hindrances induced by the large antibody molecule, which could shield the rSLURP-1 binding sites on the receptor surface.
A possible effect of SLURP-1 on metabotropic signaling through the α7-nAChR has recently been suggested by Grando et al, who observed that the inhibition of Ca2+ passage through α7-nAChRs in Ca2+-free medium or by Cd2+ or Zn2+ ions only partially suppress the SLURP-1 effects in keratinocytes [13]. According to recent reports, metabotropic signaling through nAChRs could involve different effector molecules: Jak2 kinase [13], EGF and VEGEF receptor tyrosine kinases [37], and G-proteins [38]. Probably these molecules could sense the changes in the cytoplasmic part of the nAChRs arisen from SLURP-1 binding to extracellular part of the receptor, and transmit the signal further to other cytoplasmic targets.
Conclusions
Engineering of the bacterial expression system for production of rSLURP-1 with near-native structure (the only difference is the addition of N-terminal Met) [23] allowed us to obtain new information about the function of this protein. For the first time we demonstrated that rSLURP-1 binds selectively to the α7 subtype of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. rSLURP-1 does not compete with α-bungarotoxin for binding to GH4Cl cells expressing α7-nAChRs, but inhibits α7-nAChRs expressed in Xenopus oocytes acting as allosteric antagonist. rSLURP-1 reduces proliferation of human keratinocytes, and the antiproliferative activity of rSLURP-1 is mediated by interaction with α7-nAChRs, but not suppressed by α-bungarotoxin. Our data support the hypothesis that the effects of SLURP-1 in the cells are mediated by a ‘non-classical’ mode of interaction with α7-nAChR, which may rely on metabotropic signaling. We hope that future structural-functional studies will give an opportunity to elucidate possible molecular partners involved in this type of nAChR signaling and shed light on the detailed molecular mechanisms of SLURP-1/receptor interaction.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Cecilia Gotti for providing the β2 antisera, to Eli Lilly for theGH4C1 line with the overexpressed α7 nicotinic receptor, Lars H Pinborg and Bo Jespersen for providing the human temporal neocortical tissue, and Prof. Titia Sixma for providing Ls-AChBP.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: ENL ZOS AVF MST. Performed the experiments: MAS DSK MLB DK IEK MVA MST. Analyzed the data: ENL AVF MST JDM ZOS VIT DAD MPK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MAS MST VIT DAD MPK. Wrote the paper: ENL DK MST ZOS VIT AVF MPK.
References
- 1. Miwa JM, Lester HA, Walz A. Optimizing cholinergic tone through lynx modulators of nicotinic receptors: implications for plasticity and nicotine addiction. Physiology (Bethesda). 2012;27: 187–199.
- 2. Tsetlin V, Utkin Y, Kasheverov I. Polypeptide and peptide toxins, magnifying lenses for binding sites in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009; 78: 720–731. pmid:19501053
- 3. Miwa JM, Ibanez-Tallon I, Crabtree GW, Sánchez R, Sali A, Role LW, et al. Lynx1, an endogenous toxin-like modulator of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the mammalian CNS. Neuron. 1999;23: 105–114. pmid:10402197
- 4. Tekinay AB, Nong Y, Miwa JM, Lieberam I, Ibanez-Tallon I, Greengard P, et al. A role for LYNX2 in anxiety-related behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 4477–4482. pmid:19246390
- 5. Zhang Y, Lang Q, Li J, Xie F, Wan B, Yu L. Identification and characterization of human LYPD6, a new member of the Ly-6 superfamily. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37: 2055–2062. pmid:19653121
- 6. Jensen MM, Arvaniti M, Mikkelsen JD, Michalski D, Pinborg LH, Härtig W, et al. Prostate stem cell antigen interacts with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and is affected in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36: 1629–1638. pmid:25680266
- 7. Adermann K, Wattler F, Wattler S, Heine G, Meyer M, Forssmann WG, et al. Structural and phylogenetic characterization of human SLURP-1, the first secreted mammalian member of the Ly-6/uPAR protein superfamily. Protein Sci. 1999;8: 810–819. pmid:10211827
- 8. Arredondo J, Chernyavsky AI, Jolkovsky DL, Webber RJ, Grando SA. SLURP-2: A novel cholinergic signaling peptide in human mucocutaneous epithelium. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 208: 238–245. pmid:16575903
- 9. Zhao L, Vahlquist A, Virtanen M, Wennerstrand L, Lind LK, Lundström A, et al. Palmoplantar keratoderma of the Gamborg-Nielsen type is caused by mutations in the SLURP1 gene and represents a variant of Mal de Meleda. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94(6): 707–710. pmid:24604124
- 10. Chimienti F, Hogg RC, Plantard L, Lehmann C, Brakch N, Fischer J, et al. Identification of SLURP-1 as an epidermal neuromodulator explains the clinical phenotype of Mal de Meleda. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12: 3017–3024. pmid:14506129
- 11. Arredondo J, Chernyavsky AI, Grando SA. SLURP-1 and -2 in normal, immortalized and malignant oral keratinocytes. Life Sci. 2007;80: 2243–2247. pmid:17280689
- 12. Arredondo J, Chernyavsky AI, Webber RJ, Grando SA. Biological effects of SLURP-1 on human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;125: 1236–1241. pmid:16354194
- 13. Chernyavsky AI, Arredondo J, Galitovskiy V, Qian J, Grando SA. Upregulation of nuclear factor-kappaB expression by SLURP-1 is mediated by alpha7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and involves both ionic events and activation of protein kinases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010;299: C903–911. pmid:20660165
- 14. Moriwaki Y, Yoshikawa K, Fukuda H, Fujii YX, Misawa H, Kawashima K. Immune system expression of SLURP-1 and SLURP-2, two endogenous nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligands. Life Sci. 2007;80: 2365–2368. pmid:17286989
- 15. Chernyavsky AI, Galitovskiy V, Shchepotin IB, Grando SA. Anti-inflammatory effects of the nicotinergic peptides SLURP-1 and SLURP-2 on human intestinal epithelial cells and immunocytes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014: 609086. pmid:24877120
- 16. Kawashima K, Fujii T, Moriwaki Y, Misawa H, Horiguchi K. Non-neuronal cholinergic system in regulation of immune function with a focus on α7 nAChRs. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015 Apr 20. pii: S1567-5769(15)00170-8.
- 17. Moriwaki Y, Watanabe Y, Shinagawa T, Kai M, Miyazawa M, Okuda T, et al. Primary sensory neuronal expression of SLURP-1, an endogenous nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligand. Neurosci Res. 2009;64: 403–412. pmid:19409425
- 18. Pettersson A, Nylund G, Khorram-Manesh A, Nordgren S, Delbro DS. Nicotine induced modulation of SLURP-1 expression in human colon cancer cells. Auton Neurosci. 2009;148: 97–100. pmid:19346165
- 19. Lyukmanova EN, Shulepko MA, Bychkov ML, Shenkarev ZO, Paramonov AS, Chugunov AO, et al. Human SLURP-1 and SLURP-2 Proteins Acting on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Reduce Proliferation of Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma HT-29 Cells. Acta Naturae. 2014;6: 60–66. pmid:25558396
- 20. Narumoto O, Niikura Y, Ishii S, Morihara H, Okashiro S, Nakahari T, et al. Effect of secreted lymphocyte antigen-6/urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor-related peptide-1 (SLURP-1) on airway epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;438: 175–179. pmid:23876317
- 21. Fujii T, Horiguchi K, Sunaga H, Moriwaki Y, Misawa H, Kasahara T, et al. SLURP-1, an endogenous α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor allosteric ligand, is expressed in CD205(+) dendritic cells in human tonsils and potentiates lymphocytic cholinergic activity. J Neuroimmunol. 2014;267: 43–49. pmid:24365495
- 22. Chernyavsky AI, Arredondo J, Putney DJ, Marsh JS, Grando SA. Potential role for epithelial nicotinic receptors in tobacco related oral and lung cancers. J Stomatol Invest. 2008;2: 5–14.
- 23. Shulepko MA, Lyukmanova EN, Paramonov AS, Lobas AA, Shenkarev ZO, Kasheverov IE, et al. Human neuromodulator SLURP-1: bacterial expression, binding to muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, secondary structure, and conformational heterogeneity in solution. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2013;78: 204–211.
- 24. Shulepko MA, Lyukmanova EN, Kasheverov IE, Dolgikh DA, Tsetlin VI, Kirpichnikov MP. Bacterial expression of the water-soluble domain of lynx1, an endogenous neuromodulator of human nicotinic receptors. Russian J. Bioorg. Chem. 2011;37: 543–549.
- 25. Efremenko AV, Ignatova AA, Borsheva AA, Grin MA, Bregadze VI, Sivaev IB, et al. Cobalt bis(dicarbollide) versus closo-dodecaborate in boronated chlorin e(6) conjugates: implications for photodynamic and boron-neutron capture therapy. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012,11: 645–652. pmid:22262023
- 26. Lyukmanova EN, Shenkarev ZO, Shulepko MA, Mineev KS, D’Hoedt D, Kasheverov IE, et al. NMR structure and action on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors of watersoluble domain of human LYNX1. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 10618–10627. pmid:21252236
- 27. Lyukmanova EN, Shulepko MA, Buldakova SL, Kasheverov IE, Shenkarev ZO, Reshetnikov RV, et al. Ws-LYNX1 Residues Important for Interaction with Muscle-Type and/or Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors. J Biol Chem. 2013;288: 15888–15899. pmid:23585571
- 28. Grando SA. Biological functions of keratinocyte cholinergic receptors. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 1997;2: 41–48. pmid:9487015
- 29. Kruse AC, Hu J, Kobilka BK, Wess J. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor X-ray structures: potential implications for drug development. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;16: 24–30. pmid:24662799
- 30. Moraga-Cid G, Sauguet L, Huon C, Malherbe L, Girard-Blanc C, Petres S, et al. Allosteric and hyperekplexic mutant phenotypes investigated on an α1 glycine receptor transmembrane structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112: 2865–2870. pmid:25730860
- 31. Mordvintsev DY, Polyak YL, Rodionov DI, Jakubik J, Dolezal V, Karlsson E, et al. Weak toxin WTX from Naja kaouthia cobra venom interacts with both nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. FEBS J. 2009;276: 5065–5075. pmid:19682302
- 32.
Thomsen MS, Arvaniti M, Jensen MM, Lyukmanova EN, Shulepko MA, Härtig W, et al. Lynx1 interacts with multiple nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes in the human brain: Relation to Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology. Program No. 401.14/C55. 2014 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, 2014. Available: http://www.sfn.org/~/media/SfN/Documents/Annual%20Meeting/FinalProgram/NS2014/FullAbstractPDFs_2014/SFN2014_Abstracts_PDF_Mon_PM.ashx
- 33. Colquhoun D, Dreyer F, Sheridan RE. The actions of tubocurarine at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 1979;2939: 247–284.
- 34. Chiara DC, Cohen JB. Identification of Amino Acids Contributing to High and Low Affinity d-Tubocurarine Sites in the Torpedo Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272: 32940–32950. pmid:9407073
- 35. Antil-Delbeke S, Gaillard C, Tamiya T, Corringer PJ, Changeux JP, Servent D, et al. Molecular determinants by which a long chain toxin from snake venom interacts with the neuronal alpha 7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. J Biol Chem. 2000;275: 29594–29601. pmid:10852927
- 36. Lyukmanova EN, Shenkarev ZO, Schulga AA, Ermolyuk YS, Mordvintsev DY, Utkin YN, et al. Bacterial expression, NMR, and electrophysiology analysis of chimeric short/long-chain alpha-neurotoxins acting on neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Biol Chem. 2007;282: 24784–24791. pmid:17576769
- 37. Chernyavsky AI, Shchepotin IB, Grando SA. Mechanisms of growth-promoting and tumor-protecting effects of epithelial nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015 Jun 9. pii: S1567-5769(15)00262-3.
- 38. Kabbani N, Nordman JC, Corgiat BA, Veltri DP, Shehu A, Seymour VA, et al. Are nicotinic acetylcholine receptors coupled to G proteins? Bioessays. 2013;35: 1025–1034. pmid:24185813