Figures
Abstract
A novel microbial esterase, EaEST, from a psychrophilic bacterium Exiguobacterium antarcticum B7, was identified and characterized. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing structural analysis and biochemical characterization of an esterase isolated from the genus Exiguobacterium. Crystal structure of EaEST, determined at a resolution of 1.9 Å, showed that the enzyme has a canonical α/β hydrolase fold with an α-helical cap domain and a catalytic triad consisting of Ser96, Asp220, and His248. Interestingly, the active site of the structure of EaEST is occupied by a peracetate molecule, which is the product of perhydrolysis of acetate. This result suggests that EaEST may have perhydrolase activity. The activity assay showed that EaEST has significant perhydrolase and esterase activity with respect to short-chain p-nitrophenyl esters (≤C8), naphthyl derivatives, phenyl acetate, and glyceryl tributyrate. However, the S96A single mutant had low esterase and perhydrolase activity. Moreover, the L27A mutant showed low levels of protein expression and solubility as well as preference for different substrates. On conducting an enantioselectivity analysis using R- and S-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate, a preference for R-enantiomers was observed. Surprisingly, immobilized EaEST was found to not only retain 200% of its initial activity after incubation for 1 h at 80°C, but also retained more than 60% of its initial activity after 20 cycles of reutilization. This research will serve as basis for future engineering of this esterase for biotechnological and industrial applications.
Citation: Lee CW, Kwon S, Park S-H, Kim B-Y, Yoo W, Ryu BH, et al. (2017) Crystal Structure and Functional Characterization of an Esterase (EaEST) from Exiguobacterium antarcticum. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0169540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169540
Editor: Eugene A. Permyakov, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Received: October 25, 2016; Accepted: December 19, 2016; Published: January 26, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/) under accession code 5H3H.
Funding: This work was supported by the Antarctic organisms: Cold-Adaptation Mechanisms and its application grant (PE16070), Polar Genomics 101 Project: Genome analysis of polar organisms and establishment of application platform (PE17080) and the Polar Academic Program (PD15010) funded by the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI). This study was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, which is funded by the Korean Government (MSIP), (NRF-2016M1A5A1901770) (PN16082, KOPRI). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Esterases (E.C. 3.1.1.X) are members of the α/β-hydrolase family that catalyze the hydrolysis of a variety of substrates containing ester linkages, such as aryl esters, acylglycerols, and carboxylic esters. These enzymes are widely distributed in bacteria, fungi, plants, insects, and animals, many of which are thought to play important physiological roles in lipid metabolism and detoxification of xenobiotics [1–5]. Carboxylesterases (carboxylester hydrolases, E.C. 3.1.1.1) and lipases (triacylglycerol acylhydrolases, E.C. 3.1.1.3) from microbial origin have increasingly gained interest in research, and a considerable number of novel enzymes have been discovered and characterized [6–8]. Many of them show substrate promiscuity and high regio- and stereoselectivity, as well as stability, in organic solvents; this makes them attractive biocatalysts for industrial processes including food modification, detergent formulation, and synthesis of fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals [9, 10].
Several crystal structures of microbial esterases have been described recently, such as those from the Bacillus subtilis strain 168, B. subtilis Thai I-8, and Rhodopseudomonas palustris [11, 12]. According to structural studies, esterases have a canonical α/β-hydrolase fold, which is composed of a central β-sheet surrounded by α-helices. The active site contains a catalytic triad formed by Ser-Asp-His residues, which is also found in other esterases and serine proteases. In addition, their enzymatic reaction mechanisms using this catalytic triads have been well studied [13, 14].
Over the last few years, many esterases with different enzymological properties and substrate specificities have been isolated from psychrophilic microorganisms including Psychrobacter cryohalolentis K5T, Pseudomonas mandelii, Psychrobacter pacificensis, and Thalassospira sp. GB04J01 [15–18]. Psychrophilic organisms living in a permanently cold environment produce enzymes adapted to function and display high catalytic efficiency at low temperatures [19, 20]. The relatively high activity of cold-active enzymes in low temperatures can be explained by two factors. The first is a decrease in the enthalpy of these enzymes due to a reduction in protein-ligand interactions. Thus, this may allow for substrate-binding and product-release with a low energy barrier at low temperatures. The second factor is an increase in the entropy difference between the apo-enzyme and the enzyme-substrate complex, due to the conformational flexibility of cold-active enzymes during substrate binding. It is known that these two factors cooperatively induce favorable reactions in cold-active enzymes at low temperatures [21, 22]. With ongoing demand for reducing energy consumption, cold-adapted esterases have great commercial potential and offer efficient catalytic alternatives for industrial applications [23]. Thus far, relatively fewer esterases from psychrophilic organisms have been studied compared with those from their mesophilic counterparts.
In this study, we report on the detailed structural and biochemical characteristics of an esterase (EaEST) from a psychrophilic bacterium Exiguobacterium antarcticum B7 [24]. This organism was isolated from a microbial biofilm at Ginger Lake on King George Island, Antarctic Peninsula. We determined the crystal structure of EaEST complexed with a peracetate molecule, which indicates that EaEST has perhydrolase activity. Perhydrolysis may be a side activity of esterases and lipases [25–27]. However, it can be useful in industry and organic synthesis. In our activity assay, EaEST demonstrated significant perhydrolysis activity with a kcat value of 0.24 ± 0.01 s-1, which is higher than that of the wild-type esterase (0.12 ± 0.01 s-1) from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PfEST). Recent studies on PfEST revealed that a single mutation, L29P, increased the perhydrolase activity to 5.1 ± 0.4 s-1 [27]. Therefore, EaEST can also provide a good template for constructing a perhydrolase with a higher activity via protein engineering.
The crystal structure of peracetate-bound EaEST was resolved at high resolution, revealing that EaEST retains the characteristic α/β-hydrolase fold with a cap domain and has a catalytic triad of Ser96, Asp220, and His248. The optimal pH and temperature of EaEST, as well as its substrate profiles and enantioselectivity, were investigated through mutational analysis. We found that EaEST has broad substrate profiles including short-chain p-nitrophenyl esters (≤C8), naphthyl derivatives, and glyceryl tributyrate. Furthermore, the resulting immobilization of EaEST showed significantly enhanced stability and reusability. Our results will provide a platform for the rational design and engineering of more robust biocatalysts.
Materials and Methods
Cloning and protein expression of EaEST
The EaEST gene (GenBank Accession CP003063) was amplified from chromosomal DNA of E. antarcticum B7 (Korea Collection for Type Cultures (KCTC), Republic of Korea) by PCR (hot start at 94°C (10 min) followed by 94°C (1 min), 58°C (45 sec), and 72°C (1 min), for 30 cycles with appropriate primers). The resulting PCR product was inserted into a pET-21a vector (Novagen, WI, USA), and the recombinant construct (pET-EaEST) was transformed in E. coli BL21 (DE3). A single colony was inoculated into LB medium containing ampicillin (100 mg/ml) until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 0.4~0.6. Then, induction was done with the addition of 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactoside (IPTG) for 3 h. The resulting cells were harvested, sonicated, and resuspended in a lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM imidazole, and 100 mM NaCl. After centrifugation at 18,000 rpm for 1 h, cell lysates were loaded onto a His-Trap Ni-NTA column using an AKTA Prime Plus (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, U.K.). Finally, after extensive washing with a buffer containing 20 mM imidazole, the bound EaEST was eluted with an elution buffer containing 250mM imidazole. The eluted proteins were desalted using PD-10 column with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH8.0) containing 100 mM NaCl. The protein purity of EaEST was confirmed by SDS-PAGE and one liter of culture of the transformed E. coli usually resulted in approximately 8 mg of EaEST.
Crystallization of EaEST
EaEST was purified and concentrated to 24.4 mg/mL in a buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 100 mM NaCl. A preliminary crystallization screen was performed with a mosquito robot (TTP Labtech, UK) using commercially available screening kits such as MCSG1-4 (Microlytic) and Index (Hampton Research). Initial screening was performed using sitting-drop vapor-diffusion method in 96-well crystallization plates at 293K. Two-hundred nanoliters of EaEST was mixed with an equal volume of reservoir solution and equilibrated against 80 μL of reservoir solution. Initial crystals were obtained after 1 day under several different conditions. The hexagonal shaped single crystal was obtained from 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M HEPES:NaOH pH 7.5, and 25% (w/v) PEG 3350 (MCSG2 #27). For further optimization, hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method was used in 24-well crystallization plates. Drops consisting of 1 μL of EaEST and 1 μL of reservoir solution were equilibrated against 500 μL of reservoir solution. Optimized single crystals appeared after 1 day of incubation with 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M HEPES:NaOH pH 7.5, and 27% (w/v) PEG 3350 at 293K.
Data collection and structure determination of EaEST
A single crystal of EaEST was harvested and transferred to Pratone-N oil for cryoprotection. A data set containing 180 images at the resolution of 1.90 Å was collected on a 7A beam line at Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL; Pohang, Korea) at 100K. The diffraction data were indexed, integrated, and scaled using the program HKL-2000 [28]. An EaEST crystal belongs to the trigonal space group P3, with unit cell parameters of a = 76.765 Å, b = 76.765 Å, c = 68.161 Å, and α = β = 90°, γ = 120°. The volume of the asymmetric unit allows the presence of two copies with a Matthews coefficient of 1.83 Å3Da-1 and a solvent content of 32.84% [29]. The structure of EaEST was determined by molecular replacement using the program MOLREP [30]. The coordinates of an esterase from P. fluorescens (PDB cold 3HI4) [27], which has 39% identity to EaEST, was used as a model for molecular replacement. The resulting coordinate was rebuilt and refined manually based on electron-density maps using the programs REFMAC5 and COOT [31, 32]. After multiple rounds of structural refinement, the final structure of EaEST has the Rwork and Rfree of 0.185 and 0.238, respectively, with a total of 542 amino acid residues and 191 water molecules. The statistics of data collection and structure refinement are listed in Table 1. The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/) under accession code 5H3H.
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC)
Sedimentation velocity data were obtained at 20°C using a XL-A analytical ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter). EaEST protein (2 mg/ml) in 25mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 200mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) and the reference butter were loaded into a dual sector Epon centerpiece. EaEST was spun at 45,000 rpm and the movement of a boundary formed by high centrifugal force was monitored over time at the wavelength of 280 nm. The obtained data was analyzed and calculated c(s) using the program SEDFIT [33, 34].
Enzyme assay and immobilization of EaEST
For esterase activity of EaEST, p-nitrophenyl esters of different acyl chain lengths including p-nitrophenyl acetate (C2, p-NA), butyrate (C4, p-NB), hexanoate (C6, p-NH), octanoate (C8, p-NO), decanoate (C10, p-NDec), dodecanoate (C12, p-NDo), and phosphate (p-NP) were used as substrates. The release of p-nitrophenol was measured at 405 nm using an EPOCH2 microplate reader (Biotek, USA). Regioselectivity of EaEST was also studied by using 1-naphthyl phosphate (1-NP), 1-naphthyl acetate (1-NA), 1-naphthyl butyrate (1-NB), and 2-naphthyl acetate (2-NA). The absorbance was measured at 310 nm.
The kinetic constants of EaEST toward acetic acid perhydrolysis were measured using a monochlorodimedone (MCD) assay at 25°C. All reactions contained 0.047 mM of MCD, 149 mM of potassium bromide, and appropriated amounts of the enzyme. The concentrations of acetic acid were varied to 1.4 M. The reaction was initiated with the addition of 9.9 mM of hydrogen peroxide. Enzyme activity was determined by the halogenation of MCD (ε = 19.9 mM−1 cm−1 at 290 nm) as described previously [35]. The data were fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation using nonlinear regression (GraphPad Prism 5 Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
The optimal temperature and pH were investigated in the assay mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 mM p-NA, and 10 μg of EaEST. The optimal pH was studied by measuring enzyme activity of EaEST from pH 3.0 to pH 10.0 at 25°C. Following buffers were used including 50 mM citrate-NaOH (pH 3.0–6.0), 100 mM phosphate-NaOH (pH 7.0), 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 20 mM glycine-NaOH (pH 9.0–10.0). The optimal temperature was examined at 20, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, and 80°C. Thermostability of EaEST was measured by incubating the enzyme at 0, 20, 40, 50, and 60°C for 1 h. Each aliquot was taken every 15 min for measuring the residual activity.
The effects of NaCl and glycerol additions on EaEST were determined by incubating the enzyme with various concentrations of NaCl (0–5 M) or glycerol (0–5 M) at 25°C for 1 h. For chemical stability of EaEST, the effects of ethanol, isopropanol (i-PrOH), SDS, Tween 20, Triton X-100, and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) were determined. For enantioselectivity analysis, a pH shift-colorimetric assay was carried out with (R)- and (S)-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl in 100 μl reaction mixture. The absorbance spectra were recorded from 350 nm to 600 nm. This pH shift-colorimetric assay was also used for the hydrolysis of phenyl acetate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and 2-methylbutyl acetate. In addition, the hydrolysis of glyceryl tributyrate, glyceryl trioleate, olive oil, and fish oil were measured with this assay. Fluorescence analysis was executed using a Jasco FP-8200 spectrofluorometer (MD, USA). EaEST samples were incubated with different concentration urea (0–5 M) for 1 h. After excitation at 280 nm, emission spectra were recorded from 300 nm to 400 nm using a 5 nm slit width and a scan speed of 250 nm/min.
To prepare immobilized forms of EaEST, a purified EaEST (2 mg) was precipitated with 80% ammonium sulfate and crosslinked with 50 mM glutaraldehyde with gentle inverting for 12 h. Then, suspension was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 30 min and the resulting immobilized EaESTs were washed 3 times with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl. Activity of immobilized EaEST was monitored by measuring the hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl acetate (C2, p-NA). Thermal stability of immobilized EaEST was investigated at 80°C and the activity of soluble EaEST was set to 100%. To examine reusability, immobilized EaEST was retrieved by simple centrifugation after each reaction. After repeated washing steps (usually 3 times), new substrate was added for another cycle and the activity of immobilized EaEST was measured. For surface morphology of immobilized EaEST, a scanning electron microscope (SUPRA 55VP, Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) was used. Samples were prepared by fixation process with 0.05 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1% osmium tetraoxide (OsO4) at 4°C and consecutive cycles of dehydration by ethanol solutions. After drying with hexamethyldisilazane solution, samples were mounted on metal stubs and sputtered with gold.
Results and Discussion
Overall structure of EaEST
The crystal structure of an esterase (EaEST) from Exiguobacterium antarcticum was determined in a P3 space group. As a search model, we used the structure of aryl esterase (PfEST, PDB code 3HI4) from Pseudomonas fluorescens with a molecular replacement (MR) method. The final model was refined up to 1.9 Å and produced Rwork and Rfree values of 0.185 and 0.235, respectively (Table 1). The structure of an EaEST monomer is composed of 11 α-helices and eight β-strands with dimensions of 45 × 42 × 40 Å. The structure shows a typical αβ-hydrolase fold with an α-helical cap domain. The central eight β-strands are surrounded by seven side α-helices (α1-α3 and α8-α11) and an α-helical cap domain (α4-α7 helices) (Fig 1). The asymmetric unit of an EaEST crystal contains two protomers. The results of analytical ultracentrifugation demonstrated that the purified EaEST protein is a stable trimer in solution (Fig 2A). Additionally, a crystallographic symmetry operator generates a tight trimeric arrangement, as shown in Fig 2B. The trimer interface in EaEST is formed by α1, the β4-α2 loop region, α4, α5, α6, and an α7-helix (Figs 1 and 2B). Using mainly hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, the trimer interface obscures 466 Å2 of the total monomer surface area (3176 Å2).
(A) Overall structure of monomeric EaEST is shown in front view (left panel) and top view (right panel) rotated at 90°. The structure of EaEST was drawn as a ribbon diagram with α-helices colored slate blue and β-strands colored orange. Bound peracetate molecule (cyan) is shown as a stick model with a 2Fo-Fc electron-density map (green) at 1.0 σ. The catalytic triad residues (Ser96, Asp220, and His248) are shown as stick models. N- and C-termini are labeled in gray letters and indicated with a red dashed arrow. (B) Multiple sequence alignment of EaEST (NCBI reference sequence number WP_014970431.1), aryl esterase (PDB code 3HEA; UniProtKB code P22862), bromoperoxidase (PDB code 3FOB; UniProtKB code Q81NM3), haloperoxidase (PDB code 1A8S; UniProtKB code O31158), chloroperoxidase (PDB code 4DGQ; UniProtKB code B4EA96), and esterase (PDB code 1ZOI; UniProtKB code Q3HWU8). Secondary structural elements in the crystal structure of EaEST are represented above the multiple sequence alignment. The catalytic triad residues (Ser96, Asp220, and His248) are indicated with red circles and the residues involved in the trimer interaction are indicated by black triangles. The multiple sequence alignment was performed with ClustalX and edited with GeneDoc.
(A) Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) experiments using 2 mg/mL EaEST give a mass of 85.2 kDa (sedimentation coefficient of 5.38 S and a frictional ratio of 1.29), indicating that EaEST is a stable trimer in solution. (B) EaEST trimer has a triangular shape. Each protomer has two binding interfaces for trimerization.
A search of structural homologs using the DALI server identified an aryl esterase (PDB code 3HEA and 3HI4) as the closest structural homolog of EaEST; additionally, bromoperoxidase (PDB code 3FOB), haloperoxidase (PDB code 1A8S), chloroperoxidase (PDB code 4DGQ), and esterase (PDB code 1ZOI) were included in the top five hits (Table 2) [36]. The top solution structure was the PfEST structure used in the MR search; the PfEST structure was aligned to the EaEST structure with 0.96 Å r.m.s. deviation for 307 Cα atoms. Notably, all of the listed proteins in DALI result from trimer in solution; the exception to that is haloperoxidase (PDB code 1A8S), the oligomeric state of which has not yet been experimentally resolved.
During the process of structure determination, unknown electron-density maps were found near the active sites of both molecules in the asymmetric unit (Fig 3A). Even if no specific ligands were added to EaEST at purification and crystallization, the unknown electron density was initially interpreted as an acetate because of crystallization conditions containing 0.2 M ammonium acetate. After building and refining the model, additional electron density was clearly observed in the hydroxyl group of acetic acid, indicating that EaEST has perhydrolysis activity via acetic acid. Therefore, peracetic acid could be located. Using repetitive refinement, the peracetate molecule was perfectly fitted into the electron-density map (Fig 3B). The active site of EaEST is comprised of a conserved catalytic triad (Ser96, Asp220, and His248) and the neighboring hydrophobic pocket, which is composed of the hydrophobic residues Trp30, Phe127, Met137, Leu145, Met156, Phe160, Ile163, Leu199, Phe164, and Val 222. The hydrophobic pocket may play a role in portal substrate entry and initial binding. The hydroxyl group of peracetic acid forms hydrogen bonds with the O atom of Ser96, the NE2 atom of His248, and main-chain oxygen atom of Trp30. Additionally, methyl group of peracetic acid toward the hydrophobic pocket of active site (Fig 3B and 3C).
(A) The positive electron density (green) was observed in the Fo-Fc omit map (contoured at 2.0 σ). (B) The peracetate model was overlaid on the Fo-Fc omit map (green, contoured at 2.0 σ). (C) The 2Fo-Fc electron-density map at 1.0 σ is shown after peracetate model building and refinement. (D) Peracetate-binding site is shown. Side chains of residues near ligand recognizing hydrophobic pocket (yellow circle) and active site (red circle) are indicated by sticks. (E) Conformational changes between peracetate-bound EaEST and acetate-bound PfEST (PDB code 3HI4). The β6-α4 loop region of EaEST may undergo conformational change to open the entrance hydrophobic channel for ligand exchange.
Comparison of EaEST structure with that of PfEST
Structural comparison using superimposition between EaEST and PfEST (PDB code 3HI4, acetate-bound form) shows that the overall monomer structures, as well as trimeric structures, are very similar, but the local orientation of the loop region between β6 and α4 (residues 123–141) differs slightly. In the EaEST structure, the β6-α4 loop protrudes inward, toward the center of the hydrophobic pocket, located at the vicinity of the active site. The Met137 residue, located on the β6-α4 loop, enables hydrophobic interactions with Ile163, Leu145, Phe127, and Phe160. Similarly, the Phe127 residue, located on the β6-α4 loop, is also oriented toward the hydrophobic pocket, more than is the Phe125 of PfEST. These interactions also induce further movement of the α5-helix toward the β6-α4 loop region. The α5-helix is directly involved in substrate interactions (Fig 3C). A comparison of binding sites revealed that the β6-α4 loop region also plays an important role in substrate binding. The catalytic triad of Ser96, Asp220, and His 248 (Ser94, Asp222, and His251 in PfEST) is conserved, but the residues of the neighboring hydrophobic pocket show clear distinctions. Notably, the Met137 residue (Val135 in PfEST), located on the β6-α4 loop region, shows the largest structural difference (Figs 3D and 4A). In PfEST, the Val135 residue, located on the β6-α4 loop region, shows a relatively open state of its active site. In EaEST, however, The Met137 residue extends to the hydrophobic pocket and shows a closed state compared with that of PfEST. Because of these interactions, peracetate may bind to the active site of EaEST more tightly and deeply than acetate binds to the active site of PfEST. Peracetate interacts with Trp30, Ser96, and His248 directly. In PfEST, acetate interacts with Trp28 and His251 via mediation by a water molecule. The protruding hydroxyl group of peracetic acid substitutes for a water molecule (Fig 4B and 4C). Therefore, these investigations suggest that the β6-α4 loop region may be critical for controlling ligand recognition and may function as a selective substrate filter.
(A) Stereo view of the superimposed structure of peracetate (cyan)-bound EaEST (green) and acetate (yellow)-bound PfEST (PDB code 3HI4, acetate-bound form, salmon). The residues comprising the active and ligand-binding sites are shown in a stick representation. (B) Peracetate-binding mode and its interactions in EaEST structure. (C) Acetate-binding mode and its interactions in PfEST structure.
Functional analysis of EaEST
The substrate profiles of EaEST were investigated using p-nitrophenyl esters such as p-NA, p-NB, p-NH, p-NO, p-NDec, and p-NDo. The enzyme showed considerable activity toward all tested substrates except for p-NDo (Fig 5A). The highest activity was observed with p-NA, p-NB, and p-NO, whereas the hydrolytic level of p-NDo was 90% lower than that of p-NA (set at 100%). We also analyzed substrate profiles of EaEST using naphthyl derivatives. As shown in Fig 5B, EaEST showed the highest activity toward 1-NA, followed by 1-NB and 2-NA, but showed low activity toward 1-NP.
(A) The substrate profiles of EaEST were determined using different p-NP esters (A) and naphthyl derivatives (B). (C) The reaction rate of acetic acid perhydrolysis catalyzed by wild-type EaEST. Perhydrolase activities were measured at pH 5.5 at 25°C. Kinetic constants were obtained by varying the concentration of acetic acid. (D) Specific activities for acetic acid perhydrolysis catalyzed by wild-type EaEST and the S96A mutant. (E) pH stability of EaEST. The pH dependence of hydrolysis of p-NA by EaEST was measured at 25°C. (F) Effect of temperature on the residual activity of EaEST. (G) Thermostability of EaEST. Residual activities are expressed relative to the original activity during incubation at 0, 20, 40, 45, and 50°C. The results are the mean of three individual experiments.
Previously, PfEST and its mutant showed perhydrolase activity, the reversible formation of peracetic acids from acetic acids and hydrogen peroxide, as well as esterase activity [26, 27]. The findings of our structural study led us to hypothesize that peracetate can bind to the active site of EaEST. Thus, in order to clarify whether EaEST also had perhydrolase activity, kinetic constants for acetic acid perhydrolysis were measured using the MCD assay with varied concentrations of acetic acid and 9.9 mM hydrogen peroxide. We found that EaEST is a good catalyst for perhydrolysis of acetic acid, showing a high kcat value of 0.24 ± 0.01 s-1 compared with that of PfEST (0.12 ± 0.02 s-1) (Fig 5C). Mutant S96A showed very low perhydrolase activity toward acetic acid (Fig 5D).
The optimum pH and temperature of EaEST was monitored at the pH range of 3.0 to 10.0 and temperature range of 20 to 80°C using p-NA as substrate. EaEST exhibited maximum activity at pH 8.0–9.0. However, the enzyme was rapidly inactivated at below pH 6.0, with less than 10% of its maximum activity remaining (Fig 5E). The optimum temperature for the activity of EaEST was 40°C (Fig 5F). The effect of temperature on the stability of EaEST was investigated by measuring the residual activity of EaEST at 15 min intervals using a temperature range of 0 to 50°C. There was a gradual reduction in activity as temperature increased. EaEST retained more than 50% of its initial activity after incubation at 45°C for 30 min, while a significant loss of activity occurred after only 15 min when the enzyme was incubated at 50°C (Fig 5G).
Next, we investigated the effects of NaCl and glycerol on the function of EaEST. The enzyme was most active in the presence of 2 M NaCl, but concentration of NaCl did not significantly affect enzyme activity (Fig 6A). Although, the activity decreased with increasing glycerol concentration, more than 60% of maximal activity was retained in the presence of 5 M glycerol (Fig 6B). To examine the effects of detergents and organic solvents on the stability of EaEST, the enzyme was incubated with each chemical compound, and then residual activities were measured. The results show that all the chemicals used inhibited the activity of EaEST, with less than 40% of its original activity remaining. Among these chemicals, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 1.0% (w/v) completely inhibited the activity of EaEST (Fig 6C).
Effect of NaCl (A) and glycerol (B) on the activity of EaEST. Relative activity was determined by incubating the enzyme with different concentrations of NaCl and glycerol (0 to 5 M). The maximum activity value obtained was set to 100%. (C) Chemical stability of EaEST. Residual activity after 1 h of incubation is expressed relative to the original activity obtained without the addition of chemical compounds (100%).
Enantioselectivity analysis and activity assay of EaEST and S96A mutant
Carboxylesterase has become increasingly attractive due to its ability to perform enantioselective biotransformation in the production of chiral pharmaceuticals. Thus, we conducted an enantioselectivity analysis of EaEST using a pH shift assay with (R)- and (S)-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate. Hydrolytic activity was detected based on color and changes in absorbance. As shown in Fig 7A and 7B, a change of color to yellow was observed only in the mixture containing the (R)-enantiomer, which indicates that EaEST prefers the (R)-enantiomer of the chiral ester to the (S)-enantiomer. The result was confirmed by measuring the absorbance spectra. When we performed these assays using the catalytic-site mutant S96A, the mutant showed no detectable enzymatic activity toward either the (R)- or the (S)-enantiomer. In addition to phenyl-substituted substrates, phenyl acetate, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and 2-methylbutyl acetate were also used to characterize EaEST and the S96A mutant. The hydrolytic activity of EaEST is limited to phenyl acetate. Only the reaction mixture containing phenyl acetate was observed to turn yellow, which is consistent with the results of the absorbance spectra (Fig 7C and 7D). Additionally, the enzymes were investigated for their ability to hydrolyze glyceryl esters and oils. We determined that EaEST could hydrolyze glyceryl tributyrate but showed little or no activity toward glyceryl trioleate, olive oil, or fish oil. The S96A mutant had a severely reduced ability to hydrolyze the tested substrates (Fig 7E and 7F).
(A) pH shift assay for enantioselectivity analysis of EaEST and S96A mutant conducted with (R)- and (S)-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate. (B) Absorbance spectra of the reaction mixtures in (A). (C) Hydrolysis of phenyl-substituted substrates: 1, phenyl acetate; 2, 2-phenylethyl acetate; 3, 2-methylbutyl acetate. (D) Absorbance spectra of 1 from (C) were measured. (E) Hydrolysis of glyceryl esters (glyceryl tributyrate [GTB] and glyceryl trioleate [GTO]) and oils (olive oil [OO] and fish oil [FO]) by EaEST was investigated. (F) Absorbance spectra of GTB hydrolysis by wild-type EaEST were measured.
Effect of urea on activity and conformation of EaEST
To explore the effects of urea on the activity of EaEST, enzyme activity with respect to p-NA was measured in the presence of various concentrations of urea (Fig 8A). There was a significant reduction in activity at mildly denaturing condition of 1 M urea, with only 27% of the original activity retained. EaEST activity decreased gradually with increasing urea concentrations, indicating that urea induced conformational changes at the active site of EaEST. Further, to clarify the results of the activity assays, we monitored the intrinsic fluorescence emission spectra of EaEST in the presence of different urea concentrations (Fig 8B). The conformational changes in EaEST during urea-induced unfolding were monitored using fluorescence properties of tryptophan residues, which are highly sensitive to the environment. Under native conditions, the maximum fluorescence emission wavelength (λmax) of EaEST is 327 nm. In 1 M urea, fluorescence intensity rapidly increased and λmax was red-shifted. However, increasing urea concentrations higher than 2 M caused a progressive decrease in fluorescence intensity, with accompanying red-shifted emission maximum ranging from 338 to 349 nm. The results can be attributed to the gradual exposure of Trp residues upon urea-induced unfolding of EaEST.
(A) Effect of concentration of urea on the activity of EaEST. (B) Intrinsic fluorescence spectra were recorded with increasing concentrations of urea (0 to 5 M).
Biochemical analysis of the L27A mutant of EaEST
For the mutagenesis study, we investigated substrate profiles and enantioselectivity of S96A and L27A, located in the catalytic site of EaEST. Native gel analysis with purified wild-type and mutated EaEST proteins indicated that L27A did not separate on the gel in contrast to wild-type and S96A. Moreover, the L27A mutant of EaEST was expressed at a low level and this single mutation results in reduced solubility compared to the wild-type protein, suggesting that Leu27 may be important for protein solubility. Fig 9A shows substrate profiles of L27A for p-nitrophenyl esters. Interestingly, the replacement of Leu27 by Ala considerably changed the catalytic pattern of wild-type EaEST. L27A showed the greatest preference for p-NDo and low-level activities toward p-NA and p-NB. Conversely, the wild-type was most active toward p-NA and p-NB, and did not prefer p-NDo. Substrate profiles of L27A for naphthyl derivatives were also investigated. Although L27A showed the highest activity against 1-NB, less than 20% of activity was obtained with 1-NP, 1-NA, and 2-NA relative to that of 1-NB. Wild-type EaEST demonstrated substrate preference for 1-NA rather than for 1-NB, which is different from the preference of L27A (Fig 9B). Additionally, to examine whether this mutation can modulate enantioselectivity of EaEST, pH shift assays were performed with (R)- and (S)-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropionate. As shown in Fig 9C, wild-type EaEST showed preference for (R)-enantiomers, but the L27A mutant showed no activity toward either enantiomer. These results indicate that the Leu27 residue is critical for catalytic activity, as well as for protein solubility, of EaEST.
Substrate profiles of L27A were investigated toward different p-nitrophenyl esters (A) and naphthyl derivatives (B). (C) pH shift assay was conducted in the presence of (R)- or (S)-methyl-3-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoate.
Immobilization of EaEST
Enzyme immobilization is an effective strategy to improve the stability and recyclability of free enzymes. Immobilization of EaEST was characterized for biotechnological and industrial applications. EaEST was immobilized as a cross-linked enzyme aggregate (CLEA) via precipitation with ammonium sulfate and cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of CLEAs show the morphological structure of the amorphous aggregate of EaEST (Fig 10A and 10B). The thermostability of soluble and immobilized EaEST was determined by pre-incubating at 80°C for various time intervals. Surprisingly, immobilized EaEST exhibited significantly enhanced activity and stability. Approximately 350% of its initial activity was retained after exposure to 80°C for 30 min; even after incubating for 1 hour, immobilized EaEST showed 200% of its initial activity. However, all of its soluble enzymatic activity was lost after only 15 min. The thermostability of the immobilized EaEST was higher than that of the soluble enzyme (Fig 10C). Fig 10D shows reusability of immobilized EaEST with p-NA hydrolysis. Immobilized EaEST retained more than 60% of its initial activity after 20 reutilization cycles. The results suggest that immobilized EaEST could be effectively reutilized for potential industrial applications.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (EaEST-CLEAs). Representative images at 50 kX (A) and 100 kX (B) are shown. (C) Thermostability of immobilized EaEST (■) and soluble EaEST (●) at 80°C. Activity was measured every 15 min. (D) Reusability of immobilized EaEST was compared to the soluble enzyme for 20 reaction cycles. Residual activities were expressed relative to those of free Sm23 (100%).
Conclusion
In this study, we characterized the EaEST enzyme using structural analysis based on crystal diffraction and biochemical data and activity analysis. Using an analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) analysis, we also confirmed that the purified EaEST protein forms a stable trimer in solution. These studies provide insight into an unusual enzymatic feature, the dual catalytic role of EaEST as a typical esterase and perhydrolase. The crystal structure of EaEST in peracetate-bound form provides the first structural insights into the final product-bound state during perhydrolysis. A comparison of the structure of EaEST with that of PfEST (PDB code 3HI4) revealed that the bound peracetate has different interactions compared with the bound acetate in PfEST. As a result, peracetate-binding induced rearrangements of the active site residues and conformational changes in β6-α4 loop region and the α-helix. In its esterase activity, EaEST displays the broad substrate profiles for short-chain p-nitrophenyl esters (≤C8), naphthyl derivatives, phenyl acetate, and glyceryl tributyrate. Additionally, immobilized EaEST showed approximately 200% of its initial activity and 60% activity after 20 reutilization cycles. Given that wild-type EaEST has the dual activity of esterase and perhydrolase, it can be used as template in structure-based protein engineering for developing modified enzymes having different substrate specificities or a single robust activity. For example, our L27A mutant EaEST showed different substrate preference and stereo selectivity compared with those of wild-type EaEST.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the staff at the X-ray core facility of the Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI; Ochang, Korea) and the BL-7A of the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (Pohang, Korea) for their kind help with data collection. This work was supported by the Antarctic organisms: Cold-Adaptation Mechanisms and its application grant (PE16070), Polar Genomics 101 Project: Genome analysis of polar organisms and establishment of application platform (PE17080) and the Polar Academic Program (PD15010) funded by the Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI). This study was also supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea, which is funded by the Korean Government (MSIP), (NRF-2016M1A5A1901770) (PN16082, KOPRI).
Author Contributions
- Conceptualization: TDK JHL.
- Data curation: CWL S. Kwon S-HP.
- Formal analysis: BHR H-WK SCS.
- Funding acquisition: HP TDK JHL.
- Investigation: B-YK WY H-WK SCS S. Kwon.
- Methodology: S. Kim.
- Project administration: TDK JHL.
- Resources: HP TDK.
- Writing – original draft: CWL S. Kwon S-HP S. Kim TDK JHL.
- Writing – review & editing: HP.
References
- 1. Liu P, Ewis HE, Tai PC, Lu C-D, Weber IT. Crystal structure of the Geobacillus stearothermophilus carboxylesterase Est55 and its activation of prodrug CPT-11. J Mol Biol. 2007;367: 212–223. pmid:17239398
- 2. Legler PM, Kumaran D, Swaminathan S, Studier FW, Millard CB. Structural characterization and reversal of the natural organophosphate resistance of a D-type esterase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae S-formylglutathione hydrolase. Biochemistry. 2008;47: 9592–9601. pmid:18707125
- 3. Ileperuma NR, Marshall SD, Squire CJ, Baker HM, Oakeshott JG, Russell RJ, et al. High-resolution crystal structure of plant carboxylesterase AeCXE1, from Actinidia eriantha, and its complex with a high-affinity inhibitor paraoxon. Biochemistry. 2007;46: 1851–1859. pmid:17256879
- 4. Jackson CJ, Liu J-W, Carr PD, Younus F, Coppin C, Meirelles T, et al. Structure and function of an insect α-carboxylesterase (αEsterase7) associated with insecticide resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110: 10177–10182. pmid:23733941
- 5. Bencharit S, Morton CL, Hyatt JL, Kuhn P, Danks MK, Potter PM, et al. Crystal structure of human carboxylesterase 1 complexed with the Alzheimer's drug tacrine: from binding promiscuity to selective inhibition. Chem Biol. 2003;10: 341–349. pmid:12725862
- 6. Arpigny JL, Jaeger K-E. Bacterial lipolytic enzymes: classification and properties. Biochem J. 1999;343: 177–183. pmid:10493927
- 7. Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. Production, purification, characterization, and applications of lipases. Biotechnol Adv. 2001;19: 627–662. pmid:14550014
- 8. Bornscheuer UT. Microbial carboxyl esterases: classification, properties and application in biocatalysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26: 73–81. pmid:12007643
- 9. Panda T, Gowrishankar B. Production and applications of esterases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67: 160–169. pmid:15630579
- 10. Sharma S, Kanwar SS. Organic solvent tolerant lipases and applications. Sci World J. 2014;2014:15–29.
- 11. Rozeboom HJ, Godinho LF, Nardini M, Quax WJ, Dijkstra BW. Crystal structures of two Bacillus carboxylesterases with different enantioselectivities. Biochim Biophys Acta, Proteins Proteomics. 2014;1844: 567–575.
- 12. Hajighasemi M, Nocek BP, Tchigvintsev A, Brown G, Flick R, Xu X, et al. Biochemical and structural insights into enzymatic depolymerization of polylactic acid and other polyesters by microbial carboxylesterases. Biomacromolecules. 2016; 17: 2027–2039. pmid:27087107
- 13. Nardini M, Dijkstra BW. α/β Hydrolase fold enzymes: the family keeps growing. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999;9: 732–737. pmid:10607665
- 14.
Bornscheuer UT, Kazlauskas RJ. Hydrolases in organic synthesis: regio-and stereoselective biotransformations. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Press; 2006.
- 15. Novototskaya-Vlasova K, Petrovskaya L, Yakimov S, Gilichinsky D. Cloning, purification, and characterization of a cold-adapted esterase produced by Psychrobacter cryohalolentis K5T from Siberian cryopeg. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;82: 367–375. pmid:22486752
- 16. Lee C, Kim J, Hong S, Goo B, Lee S, Jang S-H. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a recombinant esterase from cold-adapted Pseudomonas mandelii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169: 29–40. pmid:23117417
- 17. Wu G, Wu G, Zhan T, Shao Z, Liu Z. Characterization of a cold-adapted and salt-tolerant esterase from a psychrotrophic bacterium Psychrobacter pacificensis. Extremophiles. 2013;17: 809–819. pmid:23868329
- 18. De Santi C, Leiros H-KS, Di Scala A, de Pascale D, Altermark B, Willassen N-P. Biochemical characterization and structural analysis of a new cold-active and salt-tolerant esterase from the marine bacterium Thalassospira sp. Extremophiles. 2016;20: 323–336. pmid:27016194
- 19. Georlette D, Blaise V, Collins T, D'Amico S, Gratia E, Hoyoux A, et al. Some like it cold: biocatalysis at low temperatures. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28: 25–42. pmid:14975528
- 20. Struvay C, Feller G. Optimization to low temperature activity in psychrophilic enzymes. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:11643–11665. pmid:23109875
- 21. Santiago M, Ramírez-Sarmiento CA, Zamora RA, Parra LP. Discovery, molecular mechanisms, and industrial applications of cold-active enzymes. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1408–1439. pmid:27667987
- 22. Lonhienne T, Gerday C, Feller G. Psychrophilic enzymes: revisiting the thermodynamic parameters of activation may explain local flexibility. Biochim Biophys Acta, Protein Struct Mol Enzymol. 2000;1543: 1–10.
- 23. Luisa Tutino M, di Prisco G, Marino G, de Pascale D. Cold-adapted esterases and lipases: from fundamentals to application. Protein Pept Lett. 2009;16:1172–1180. pmid:19508185
- 24. Carneiro AR, Ramos RTJ, Dall'Agnol H, Pinto AC, de Castro Soares S, Santos AR, et al. Genome sequence of Exiguobacterium antarcticum B7, isolated from a biofilm in Ginger Lake, King George Island, Antarctica. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(23):6689–90. pmid:23144424
- 25. Carboni-Oerlemans C, de María PD, Tuin B, Bargeman G, van Gemert R. Hydrolase-catalysed synthesis of peroxycarboxylic acids: Biocatalytic promiscuity for practical applications. J Biotechnol. 2006;126: 140–151. pmid:16730828
- 26. Bernhardt P, Hult K, Kazlauskas RJ. Molecular basis of perhydrolase activity in serine hydrolases. Angew Chem. 2005;117: 2802–2806.
- 27. Yin DL, Bernhardt P, Morley KL, Jiang Y, Cheeseman JD, Purpero V, et al. Switching catalysis from hydrolysis to perhydrolysis in Pseudomonas fluorescens esterase. Biochemistry. 2010;49: 1931–1942. pmid:20112920
- 28. Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Macromol Crystallogr Part A. 1997;276: 307–326.
- 29. Kantardjieff KA, Rupp B. Matthews coefficient probabilities: improved estimates for unit cell contents of proteins, DNA, and protein–nucleic acid complex crystals. Protein Sci. 2003;12: 1865–1871. pmid:12930986
- 30. Vagin A, Teplyakov A. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J Appl Crystallogr. 1997;30: 1022–1025.
- 31. Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr, Sect D: Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60: 2126–2132.
- 32. Murshudov GN, Skubák P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr, Sect D: Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67: 355–367.
- 33. Schuck P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. Biophys J. 2000;78: 1606–1619. pmid:10692345
- 34. Schuck P, Rossmanith P. Determination of the sedimentation coefficient distribution by least‐squares boundary modeling. Biopolymers. 2000;54: 328–341. pmid:10935973
- 35. Yamada H, Itoh N, Murakami S, Izumi Y. New bromoperoxidase from coralline algae that brominates phenol compounds. Agric Biol Chem. 1985;49: 2961–2967.
- 36. Holm L, Rosenström P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Suppl 2): W545–W549.
- 37. Hofmann B, Tölzer S, Pelletier I, Altenbuchner J, Van Pee K, Hecht H. Structural investigation of the cofactor-free chloroperoxidases. J Mol Biol. 1998;279: 889–900. pmid:9642069
- 38. Elmi F, Lee H-T, Huang J-Y, Hsieh Y-C, Wang Y-L, Chen Y-J, et al. Stereoselective esterase from Pseudomonas putida IFO12996 reveals α/β hydrolase folds for D-β-acetylthioisobutyric acid synthesis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187: 8470–8476. pmid:16321951