Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Distribution and amplification of interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) in Australian dragon lizards support frequent chromosome fusions in Iguania

  • Kornsorn Srikulnath ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    kornsorn.s@ku.ac.th (KS); Tariq.Ezaz@canberra.edu.au (TE)

    ‡ These authors are joint first authors on this work.

    Affiliations Institute for Applied Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, Laboratory of Animal Cytogenetics and Comparative Genomics (ACCG), Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

    ⨯
  • Bhumika Azad ,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Current address: John Curtin School of Medical Research and Canberra Hospital, Australian National University, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    ‡ These authors are joint first authors on this work.

    Affiliation Institute for Applied Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    ⨯
  • Worapong Singchat,

    Roles Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Laboratory of Animal Cytogenetics and Comparative Genomics (ACCG), Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

    ⨯
  • Tariq Ezaz

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    kornsorn.s@ku.ac.th (KS); Tariq.Ezaz@canberra.edu.au (TE)

    Affiliation Institute for Applied Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

    ⨯

Abstract

Telomeric sequences are generally located at the ends of chromosomes; however, they can also be found in non-terminal chromosomal regions when they are known as interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs). Distribution of ITSs across closely related and divergent species elucidates karyotype evolution and speciation as ITSs provide evolutionary evidence for chromosome fusion. In this study, we performed physical mapping of telomeric repeats by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in seven Australian dragon lizards thought to represent derived karyotypes of squamate reptiles and a gecko lizard with considerably different karyotypic feature. Telomeric repeats were present at both ends of all chromosomes in all species, while varying numbers of ITSs were also found on microchromosomes and in pericentromeric or centromeric regions on macrochromosomes in five lizard species examined. This suggests that chromosomal rearrangements from ancestral squamate reptiles to Iguania occurred mainly by fusion between ancestral types of acrocentric chromosomes and/or between microchromosomes, leading to appearance of bi-armed macrochromosomes, and in the reduction of microchromosome numbers. These results support the previously proposed hypothesis of karyotype evolution in squamate reptiles. In addition, we observed the presence of telomeric sequences in the similar regions to heterochromatin of the W microchromosome in Pogona barbata and Doporiphora nobbi, while sex chromosomes for the two species contained part of the nucleolar organiser regions (NORs). This likely implies that these ITSs are a part of the satellite DNA and not relics of chromosome fusions. Amplification of telomeric repeats may have involved heterochromatinisation of sex-specific W chromosomes and play a role in the organisation of the nucleolus.

Citation: Srikulnath K, Azad B, Singchat W, Ezaz T (2019) Distribution and amplification of interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) in Australian dragon lizards support frequent chromosome fusions in Iguania. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0212683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683

Editor: Riccardo Castiglia, Universita degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, ITALY

Received: December 11, 2018; Accepted: February 7, 2019; Published: February 22, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Srikulnath et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding: This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship to TE (FT110100733) and an Endeavour Research Fellowship (6801_2018) to KS and IAE innovation fund to TE. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Positive correlation of karyotype diversity and species richness is found in squamate reptiles [1]. Both macro- and microchromosomes are commonly found in Scincoidea and Episquamata, exclusive of Lacertidae; by contrast, only few or no microchromosomes are found in Lacertidae and most species of Gekkota [2]. Comparative genome analysis among squamate reptiles, using chicken as a reference species, identified high levels of conserved synteny across species, allowing delineation of the process of chromosomal rearrangements over 200 million years [3–13]. All macrochromosomes of Toxicofera species (snakes, anguimorphid lizards and iguanian lizards) are highly conserved in lacertid and gekkonid lizards, which have variable karyotypes. Nine of seventeen macrochromosome pairs of sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) karyotype (2n = 38: 36 macrochromosomes and 2 microchromosomes) showed conserved synteny with ten chromosome pairs of the Hokou gecko (Gekko hokouensis) karyotype (no microchromosomes) and macrochromosomes and/or macrochromosome segments of Toxicofera species [8,9]. This suggests that series of fusion-fission events between macrochromosomes or other microchromosomes has resulted in the evolution of diversified/variable karyotypes in squamate reptiles [8,9,12].

The karyotype of iguanian lizards (Iguania) is highly conserved with a diploid complement of 36 including six pairs of macrochromosomes and twelve pairs of microchromosomes [2,14]. Karyotypes in Iguania is proposed to have evolved by repeated fusion between macrochromosomes and/or other microchromosomes, leading to the origin of bi-armed macrochromosomes and reduction of microchromosomes [6–9,12]. With few exceptions, most of the Australian dragon lizards exhibit 2n = 32, including six pairs of macrochromosomes and ten pairs of microchromosomes, implying that repeated fusion predominantly occurred in this group [2,14]. Dynamic transitions of sex determination are also found in the same evolutionary clade, although their karyotype is highly conserved [15–18]. Our previous chromosome mapping indicated the occurrence of simple translocation between macrochromosomes and sex microchromosomes or between macrochromosomes and microchromosomes in Australian dragon lizards ([11], Matsubara et al. unpublished data). This suggests that change in chromosome structure affected the transition of sex determination mode and make this lineage an excellent research model for evolution of genome, chromosomes and sex chromosomes. Interestingly, change in chromosome structure, especially chromosome fusion often relates to telomeric repeats [19,20]; thus, it is extremely important to understand how telomeric repeats relate to chromosomal rearrangement in this lineage.

Vertebrate chromosome ends are capped by telomeres that physically protect them from DNA repair and recombination, maintain chromosome stability and integrity, and control replicative lifespan [21,22]. This structure comprises nucleoprotein complexes associated with tandem telomeric DNA repeats (TTAGGG), widely recognised as a remarkable evolutionary conservation feature [21,22]. However, the distribution of these sequences at non-telomeric sites, known as interstitial telomeric sequences (ITSs) or interstitial telomeric repeats (ITRs) was also observed in several lineages [22]. ITSs can be classified into two different types according to their organisation as short ITSs (s-ITSs) and heterochromatic ITSs (het-ITSs) [19]. The s-ITSs exist as short sized telomeric DNA involving mechanisms of DNA repair, while het-ITSs are large stretches of telomeric sequences located mainly in centromeric or pericentromeric heterochromatic regions or euchromatic regions within the chromosome arms. The het-ITSs are considered to be relics of chromosomal rearrangements in the evolutionary process involving fusion or inversion which occurred within derived karyotypes. In squamate reptiles, the presence of ITSs is frequently observed in Iguania, which is supposed to have a derived karyotype from other squamate reptiles [6,12,23,24]. To test this hypothesis and to better characterise Iguanian karyotype evolution, distribution of telomeric sequences in Australian dragon lizards was analysed together with a gecko lizard (Hemidactylus frenatus) with largely different karyotypes as the outgroup. The significance of telomeric distribution was discussed.

Materials and methods

Animal and chromosome preparation

Seven dragon lizard species containing both male and female individuals and both male and female gecko lizard species were examined. Detailed information is presented in Table 1. Euthanasia and sexing were performed as described in Ezaz et al. [16]. Briefly, animals were euthanised by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbitone at a concentration of 150 mg/g body weight. Phenotypic sex was determined on the basis of external morphology by hemipenes eversion [25] and by internal examination of gonadal morphology. All experiments were performed with the approval of the University of Canberra and Kasetsart University Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee (CEAE 11/07 and ACKU61-SCI-021). Metaphase chromosomes were prepared either from short-term culture of whole blood or from fibroblast cell lines as described by Ezaz et al. [15,16] and Srikulnath et al. [26]. Chromosome slides were treated with 100 μg/ml RNase for 1 h at 37°C and then rinsed three times in 2 × SSC.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. List of species, collection sites and their interstitial telomeric sequence (ITS) distribution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683.t001

Telomere peptide nucleic acid probe

Telomeric mapping was performed as described previously [27]. Briefly, 10 μl of hybridisation mixture containing 70% formamide, 0.3 μg/ml Cy3-(CCCTAA)3 peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe (Biosynthesis, Inc., Texas) and 1× Denhardt’s solution in 10 mM Tris pH 7.2 were added to the slide under a coverslip and sealed with rubber cement. The DNA was denatured by heating for 3 min at 80°C. After hybridisation for 2 h at 37°C in a humidified chamber, the slides were washed at room temperature with 70% formamide, 1% BSA, 10 mM Tris pH 7.2 (2 times for 15 min) and then with 0.1 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.5 containing 0.08% Tween-20 (3 times for 5 min). The slides were then dehydrated through an ethanol series (1 min in each of a 70%, 90% and 100% solution), air dried, stained with DAPI (4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (50 μg/ml DAPI solution in 2 × SSC) for 45 s at room temperature and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). Images were captured using a Zeiss Axio Scope A1 epifluorescence microscope fitted with a high-resolution microscopy camera AxioCam MRm Rev. 3 (Carl Zeiss Ltd.) and analysed using AxioVision v4.8.1 software or ISIS Fluorescence Imaging System (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany).

Results

Fluorescence hybridisation signals of the PNA telomeric probe Cy3-(CCCTAA)3 were observed at the telomeric ends of all chromosomes in seven dragon lizards and the gecko lizard (Figs 1–3). The hybridisation signals were weak on macrochromosomes; by contrast, high intensity signals were observed on almost all microchromosomes in the seven dragon lizards. ITSs were observed in all species examined. In Pogona barbata, ITSs were found on several microchromosomes and sex microchromosomes (Z and/or W chromosomes), while ITSs were localised to one microchromosome pair of Ctenophorous fordi and Physignathus leseuirii (Table 1). ITSs were localised to the W microchromosome and pericentromeric regions of chromosome 1 in Diporiphora nobbi but only near the pericentromeric region of chromosome 1 in Hydrosaurus pustulatus. By contrast, ITSs were detected in the centromeric regions of all macrochromosomes and two microchromosome pairs in Amphibolurus norrissi and A. muricatus (Fig 2). No ITSs were found on the gecko lizard H. frenatus (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Chromosomal locations of (CCCTAA)n sequences in Pogona barbata and Diporiphora nobbi.

Hybridisation pattern of Cy3-labelled CCCTAA repeats (red) in male P. barbata (a), female P. barbata (b), male D. nobbi (c) and female D. nobbi (d). Arrows indicate signals of interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs). The square box indicates the enlarged chromosome containing ITSs. Scale bar represents 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683.g001

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Chromosomal locations of (CCCTAA)n sequences in Amphibolurus norrissi, Amphibolurus muricatus, Ctenophorous fordi, Physignathus leseuirii and Hydrosaurus pustulatus.

Hybridisation pattern of Cy3-labelled CCCTAA repeats (red) in male A. norrissi (a), female A. norrissi (b), male A. muricatus (c), female A. muricatus (d), male C. fordi (e), female C. fordi (f), male P. leseuirii (g), female P. leseuirii (h) and male H. pustulatus (i). Arrows indicate signals of interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs). The square box indicates the enlarged chromosome containing ITSs. Scale bar represents 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 3. Chromosomal locations of (CCCTAA)n sequences in Hemidactylus frenatus.

Hybridisation pattern of Cy3-labelled CCCTAA repeats (red) in male H. frenatus (a), female H. frenatus (b). Scale bar represents 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683.g003

Discussion

Comparative chromosome maps of squamate reptiles suggest that chromosome fusion between macrochromosomes or other microchromosomes occurred in iguanian lizards, resulting in all macrochromosomes being bi-armed and in the reduction of microchromosome numbers [6–9,12], while cross-species chromosome painting analysis revealed several conserved syntenies among gecko lizard chromosomes (Gekko and Hemidactylus) [28]. In our study, highly intense signals were observed on almost all microchromosomes in the seven dragon lizards but not on macrochromosomes, suggesting that telomeric repeats were amplified site-specifically. We also observed ITSs in pericentromeric or centromeric regions of all bi-armed macrochromosomes in A. norrissi and A. muricatus, similar what has been reported in several other iguanian lizards, such as Polychrus acutirostris, P. marmoratus, Anolis distichus and A. equestris and [23,29,30]. Iguanian lizards and snake chromosome 1 correspond to two acrocentric chromosomes of lacertid lizards and two chromosome arms of different bi-armed chromosomes in gekkonid lizards [6–9,11,12,31]. ITSs observed in pericentromeric regions of chromosome 1 in D. nobbi, H. pustulatus, and two species of Amphibolurus also show cytogenetic evidence that chromosome 1 in iguanian lizard is derived from centric fusion between the ancestral acrocentric chromosomes. Several pericentric inversions have been discovered in macrochromosomes of Anolis carolinensis [32] which may represent remnants of ancestral intrachromosomal rearrangements that occurred in the lineage. Additionally, ITSs were found in several microchromosomes within our study species with the exception of H. pustulatus, suggesting likely chromosome fusions between microchromosomes. However, several events involving chromosome fusion were not observed for ITSs in some iguanian lizard species. This suggests that the loss of telomeric repeats in interstitial regions have resulted from recombination events over evolutionary time [33], leading to a variety of ITS distribution in different iguanian lizards. Incidence of ITS distribution in iguanian lizards is higher than those of snakes and anguimorphid lizards (Toxicofera species) [23,30]. This suggests that these recently rearranged chromosomes in iguanian lizards have retained the relics of former telomeres on the segments when compared with those of snakes and anguimorphid lizards that probably occurred long evolutionary time ago (Fig 4). However, total number of species tested for the presence of ITSs remains small in snakes and anguimorphid lizards [7,23,34,35]. Therefore, chromosome mapping of telomeric repeats will be required in more snakes and anguimorphid lizards to clarify these finding as conclusive evidence.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 4. Schematic representation of the distribution of interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs) in centromeric or pericentromeric regions on chromosomes and amplification of telomeric repeats on sex chromosome in lizards and snakes.

Phylogeny was partially derived from Pyron et al. [39]. Distribution of ITSs and telomeric repeat amplifications of lizards and snakes were also obtained from Young et al. [11], Matsubara et al. [37], Augstenová et al. [34], Rovatsos et al. [23,30] and Srikulnath et al. [7,9].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212683.g004

Telomeric DNA can also contain repeat elements similar to centromeric repeat elements [36]. This suggests that ITSs on the centromeres may result from extensive amplification of telomere-like satellite DNAs within centromere. Molecular cloning of centromeric satellite DNA in Australian dragon lizards will be required to test whether similar amplification has also occurred within this group. Additionally, the heterochromatic W microchromosome showed large amplification of telomeric repeats in P. barbata and D. nobbi. A similar pattern was observed in P. vitticeps as closely related species with P. barbata [11]. Such amplification of telomeric repeats in the heterochromatic region on W chromosomes has been reported in several caenophidian snakes and other squamate reptiles [11,34,35,37,38]. These telomeric repeats are probably considered as a regular component of satellite DNA in heterochromatin. This suggests that amplification of repeat sequences probably involved heterochromatinisation of sex-specific chromosomes, particularly W chromosomes in species D. nobbi, P. barbata and P. vitticeps. The W sex chromosomes of D. nobbi and P. barbata also contained part of the nucleolar organiser regions (NORs) in addition to chromosome 2 [Matsubara et al. unpublished data]. Such ITSs showing co-localisation with NOR have also been reported in butterfly lizard chromosomes [20,26]). This suggests the possibility that NORs are associated with telomeric sequences which may play a role in the organisation of the nucleolus [38].

The karyotypic variability in Australian dragon lizards allowed examination of ITS relationships with chromosomal rearrangements, heterochromatin and NORs. Different patterns of ITSs may be due to the age of chromosomal rearrangements. Further studies involving chromosome mapping of telomeric repeats as well as satellite DNA in more representative species from divergent taxa are required to better understand evolutionary origins and distributions of ITS in squamate reptiles.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship to TE (FT110100733) and an Endeavour Research Fellowship (6801_2018) to KS. BA was supported by research assistance funded by IAE innovation fund awarded to TE. We would also like to thank Arthur Georges, Denis O’Mealey, Mathew Young and Peter Harlow for help with animal sample and Jacqui Richardson and Alistair Zealey for their care of captive animals

References

  1. 1. Olmo E. Trends in the evolution of reptilian chromosomes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2008; 48: 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icn049 pmid:21669809
  2. 2. Olmo E, Signorino G. Chromorep: a reptile chromosomes database. 2005; Available from: http://chromorep.univpm.it.
  3. 3. Matsuda Y, Nishida-Umehara C, Tarui H, Kuroiwa A, Yamada K, Isobe T, et al. Highly conserved linkage homology between birds and turtles: bird and turtle chromosomes are precise counterparts of each other. Chromosome Res. 2005; 13: 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-005-0986-5 pmid:16170625
  4. 4. Matsubara K, Tarui H, Toriba M, Yamada k, Nishida-Umehara C, Agata k, et al. Evidence for different origin of sex chromosomes in snakes, birds, and mammals and step-wise differentiation of snake sex chromosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006; 103: 18190–18195. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605274103 pmid:17110446
  5. 5. Matsubara K, Kuraku S, Tarui H, Nishimura O, Nishida C, Agata K, et al. Intra-genomic GC heterogeneity in sauropsids: evolutionary insights from cDNA mapping and GC3 profiling in snake. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 604. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-604 pmid:23140509
  6. 6. Srikulnath K, Nishida C, Matsubara K, Uno Y, Thongpan A, Suputtitada S, et al. Karyotypic evolution in squamate reptiles: comparative gene mapping revealed highly conserved linkage homology between the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata, Agamidae, Lacertilia) and the Japanese four-striped rat snake (Elaphe quadrivirgata, Colubridae, Serpentes). Chromosome Res. 2009; 17: 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-009-9101-7 pmid:19937109
  7. 7. Srikulnath K, Uno Y, Nishida C, Matsuda Y. Karyotype evolution in monitor lizards: cross-species chromosome mapping of cDNA reveals highly conserved synteny and gene order in the Toxicofera clade. Chromosome Res. 2013; 21: 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-013-9398-0 pmid:24343421
  8. 8. Srikulnath K, Matsubara K, Uno Y, Nishida C, Olsson M, Matsuda Y. Identification of the linkage group of the Z sex chromosomes of the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis, Lacertidae) and elucidation of karyotype evolution in lacertid lizards. Chromosoma. 2014; 123: 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0467-8 pmid:24840599
  9. 9. Srikulnath K, Uno Y, Nishida C, Ota H, Matsuda Y. Karyotype reorganization in the Hokou Gecko (Gekko hokouenesis, Gekkonidae): the process of microchromosome disappearance in Gekkota. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0134829. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134829 pmid:26241471
  10. 10. Uno Y, Nishida C, Tarui H, Ishishita S, Takagi C, Nishimura O, et al. Inference of the protokaryotypes of amniotes and tetrapods and the evolutionary processes of microchromosomes from comparative gene mapping. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e53027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053027 pmid:23300852
  11. 11. Young MJ, O’Meally D, Sarre SD, Georges A, Ezaz T. Molecular cytogenetic map of the central bearded dragon, Pogona vitticeps (Squamata: Agamidae). Chromosome Res. 2013; 21: 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-013-9362-z pmid:23703235
  12. 12. Deakin JE, Edwards MJ, Patel H, O’Meally D, Lian J, Stenhouse R, et al. Anchoring genome sequence to chromosomes of the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) enables reconstruction of ancestral squamate macrochromosomes and identifies sequence content of the Z chromosome. BMC Genomics. 2016; 17: 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2774-3 pmid:27286959
  13. 13. Zheng Y, Wiens JJ. Combining phylogenomic and supermatrix approaches, and a time-calibrated phylogeny for squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes) based on 52 genes and 4162 species. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016; 94: 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.10.009 pmid:26475614
  14. 14. Witten G. Some karyotypes of Australian agamids (Reptilia: Lacertilia) Aust. J. Zool. 1983; 31: 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO9830533
  15. 15. Ezaz T, Quinn AE, Miura I, Sarre SD, Georges A, Graves JAM. The dragon lizard Pogona vitticeps has ZZ/ZW micro-sex chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 2005; 13: 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-005-1010-9 pmid:16331408
  16. 16. Ezaz T, Quinn AE, Sarre SD, O’Meally D, Georges A, Graves JAM. Molecular marker suggests rapid changes of sex-determining mechanisms in Australian dragon lizards. Chromosome Res. 2009; 17: 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-9019-5 pmid:19172405
  17. 17. Quinn AE, Georges A, Sarre SD, Guarino F, Ezaz T, Graves JAM. Temperature sex reversal implies sex gene dosage in a reptile. Science. 2007, 316: 411. https://doi.org10.1126/science.1135925 pmid:17446395
  18. 18. Holleley CE, O'Meally D, Sarre SD, Graves JAM, Ezaz T, Matsubara K, et al. Sex reversal triggers the rapid transition from genetic to temperature-dependent sex. Nature. 2015; 523: 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14574 pmid:26135451
  19. 19. Ruiz-Herrera A, Nergadze SG, Santagostino M, Giulotto E. Telomeric repeats far from the ends: mechanisms of origin and role in evolution. Cytogenet. Genome. Res. 2008; 122: 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1159/000167807 pmid:19188690
  20. 20. Bolzán AD. Interstitial telomeric sequences in vertebrate chromosomes: Origin, function, instability and evolution. 2017; 773: 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2017.04.002 PMID: 28927537
  21. 21. Meyne J, Ratliff RL, Moyzis RK. Conservation of the human telomere sequence (TTAGGG)n among vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1989; 87: 7049–7053. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.18.7049P MID: pmid:2780561
  22. 22. Meyne J, Baker RJ, Hobart HH, Hsu TC, Ryder OA, Ward OG, et al: Distribution of non-telomeric sites of the (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequences in vertebrate chromosomes. Chromosoma. 1990; 99: 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737283 pmid:2340757
  23. 23. Rovatsos M, Kratochvíl L, Altmanová M, Pokorná JM. Interstitial telomeric motifs in Squamate reptiles: when the exceptions outnumber the rule. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0134985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134985 pmid:26252002
  24. 24. Srikulnath K, Uno Y, Matsubara K, Thongpan A, Suputtitada S, Apisitwanich S, et al. Chromosomal localization of the 18S–28S and 5S rRNA genes and (TTAGGG)n sequences of butterfly lizards (Leiolepis belliana belliana and Leiolepis boehmei, Agamidae, Squamata). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2011; 34: 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572011005000042 pmid:22215961
  25. 25. Harlow PS. A harmless technique for sexing hatchling lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 1996; 27: 71–72
  26. 26. Srikulnath K, Matsubara K, Uno Y, Thongpan A, Suputtitada S, Apisitwanich S, et al. Karyological characterization of the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata, Agamidae, Squamata) by molecular cytogenetic approach. Cytogenet. Genome. Res. 2009; 125: 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000230005 pmid:19738381
  27. 27. O’Meally D, Miller H, Patel H, Graves JAM, Ezaz T. The first cytogenetic map of the tuatara, Sphenodon punctatus. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2009; 127: 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1159/000300099 pmid:20299781
  28. 28. Trifonov VA, Giovannotti M, O'Brien PC, Wallduck M, Lovell F, Rens W, et al. Chromosomal evolution in Gekkonidae. I. Chromosome painting between Gekko and Hemidactylus species reveals phylogenetic relationships within the group. Chromosome res. 2011. 19: 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-011-9241-4 pmid:21987185
  29. 29. Bertolotto CEV, Rodrigues MT, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y. et al. Banding patterns, multiple sex chromosome system and localization of telomeric (TTAGGG)n sequences by FISH on two species of Polychrus (Squamata, Polychrotidae). Caryologia. 2001; 54: 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2001.10589229
  30. 30. Rovatsos M, Altmanová M, Johnson Pokorná M, Velenský P, Sánchez Baca A, et al. Evolution of karyotypes in chameleons. Genes. 2017; 8: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8120382 pmid:29231849
  31. 31. Ezaz T, Azad B, O’Meally D, Young MJ, Matsubara K, Edwards MJ, et al. Sequence and gene content of a large fragment of a lizard sex chromosome and evaluation of candidate sex differentiating gene R-spondin 1. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 899. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-899 pmid:24344927
  32. 32. Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M, Williams C, Kong L, Mauceli E, et al. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature. 2011; 477: 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10390 pmid:21881562
  33. 33. Scherthan H. Localization of the repetitive telomeric sequence (TTAGGG)n in two muntjac species and implications for their karyotypic evolution. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1990; 53: 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1159/000132908 pmid:2369836
  34. 34. Augstenová B, Mazzoleni S, Kratochvíl L, Rovatsos M. Evolutionary dynamics of the W chromosome in caenophidian snakes. Genes. 2018; 9: 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9010005 pmid:29283388
  35. 35. Singchat W, O’Connor B, Tawichasri T, Suntronpong A, Sillapaprayoon S, Suntrarachun S. et al. Chromosome map of the Siamese cobra: did partial synteny of sex chromosomes in the amniote represent “a hypothetical ancestral super-sex chromosome” or random distribution? BMC Genomics. 2018; 19: 939. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5293-6 pmid:30558533
  36. 36. Rovatsos M, Altmanová M, Pokorná M, Kratochvíl L. Conserved sex chromosomes across adaptively radiated Anolis lizards. Evolution. 2014; 68: 2079–2085. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12357 pmid:24433436
  37. 37. Matsubara K, Uno Y, Srikulnath K, Matsuda Y, Miller E, Olsson M. No interstitial telomeres on autosomes but remarkable amplification of telomeric repeats on the W sex chromosome in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J Hered. 2015; 106: 753–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv083 pmid:26464091
  38. 38. Liu W-S, Fredga K. Telomeric (TTAGGG)n sequences are associated with nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) in the wood lemming. Chromosome Res, 1999; 7: 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009255517764 pmid:10421383
  39. 39. Pyron RA, Burbrink FT, Wiens JJ. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol Bio, 2013; 13: 93.