Title: Long-term protection of bridge-deck systems with structural latex-modified concrete overlays
Date: Summer, 2010
Volume: 55
Issue: 3
Page number: 122-137
Author(s): Mohammad A. Alhassan, Mohsen A. Issa
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.06012010.122.137
Click here to access the full journal article
Abstract
Latex-modified concrete (LMC) overlays have performance characteristics that are superior to microsilica concrete (MSC) overlays and other overlay types. LMC provides unique features that are critical for fulfilling the functionality of the overlay. Polymerization of the latex creates a membrane around the LMC particles, resulting in a low-permeable product with inherent flexibility to accommodate freeze-and-thaw stresses. LMC overlays adhere properly to the deck substrate and have high early-age strength that allows for opening to traffic early. Toughness characteristics can be enhanced by adding synthetic fibers to the LMC to eliminate the possibility of early-age shrink - age cracking and to provide crack-arresting capabilities. Accordingly, the fibrous LMC overlay is the best overlay choice to ensure long-term durability with appropriate functionality. Major factors limit the popularity of the fibrous LMC overlays:
• Installation of the fibrous LMC overlay requires the use of volumetric mobile trucks.
• It is difficult to feed the right dosage of synthetic fibers to the LMC in a mobile truck.
• The LMC has a short setting time.
• The initial cost of the fibrous LMC overlay is high compared with the MSC overlay.
However, its ability to open early to traffic, durability, minimal maintenance cost, high-quality product, and structural advantages must be visualized in the cost comparison. This paper provides useful recommendations and guidelines about the practices involved in the design and construction of fibrous LMC overlays based on the findings of a four-year comprehensive experimental research program as well as other reliable studies. Structural advantages of fibrous LMC overlays and quantification to the live load and shrinkage-induced deck-overlay interfacial stresses are also discussed.
References
1. Alhassan, Mohammad A. Performance-Based Aspects and Structural Behavior of High Performance Fibrous Bonded Concrete Overlays. 2007. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago.
2. Issa, M. A. 2004. Evaluation and Recommendation of Overlay Materials for the New Mississippi River Bridge. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Transportation.
3. Issa, M. A., Mohammad A. Alhassan, and Hameed I. Shabila. 2007. Low Cycle Fatigue Testing of HPC Bonded Overlay-Bridge Deck Slab Systems. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, V. 12, No. 4 (July– August): pp. 419–428.
4. Issa, M. A., Mohammad A. Alhassan, and Jill Ramos. 2007. Glass Fiber Reinforced Latex-Modified Concrete Using a Volumetric Mixer for Production of Overlays. Concrete International, V. 29, No. 3 (March): pp. 48–52.
5. Issa, M. A., Hameed Shabila, and M. A. Alhassan. 2004. High Performance Concrete for Bridge Decks and Overlays: Laboratory and Field Investigations. DVD. In Innovations and Emerging Technology in Concrete Technology, The 7th International Conference on Concrete Technology in Developing Countries.
6. Issa, M. A., Mohammad A. Alhassan, and Rajai Alrousan. 2006. High Performance Bonded Concrete Overlays for Full-Depth and Segmental Bridge Deck Construction. In The PCI National Bridge Conference: Proceedings, October 23–25, 2006, Grapevine, Texas. CD-ROM.
7. Issa, M. A., M. A. Alhassan, and H. I. Shabila. 2008. High Performance Plain and Fibrous Latex-Modified and Micro-Silica Concrete Overlays. ASCE Journal of Materials Engineering, V. 20, No. 12 (December): pp. 742–753.
8. Sprinkel, M. M., and C. Moen. 1999. Evaluation of the Installation and Initial Condition of Latex Modified and Silica Fume Modified Concrete Overlays Placed on Six Bridges in Virginia. VTRC 99-IR2. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC).
9. Sprinkel, M. M. 1984. Overview of Latex Modified Concrete Overlays. VTRC85-R1. Charlottesville, VA: VTRC.
10. Sprinkel, M. M. 1992. Twenty Year Performance of Latex-Modified Concrete Overlays. Transportation Research Record no. 1335. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board (TRB).
11. Sprinkel, M. M. Very-Early Strength Latex-Modified Concrete Overlay. 99-TAR3RB. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
12. Sprinkel, M. M. 2006. Deck Protection Systems for Post-Tensioned Segmental Concrete Bridges. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
13. Babaei, K. 1987. Evaluation of Concrete Overlays for Bridge Application. Research project Y-3399, task 2. Seattle, WA: Washington State Transportation Center.
14. Babaei, K., and N. M. Hawkins. 1990. Performance of Bridge Deck Concrete Overlays. In Extending the Life of Bridges, STP 1100:95-108. American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA.
15. Kuhlmann, L. 1988. Using Styrene-Butadiene Latex in Concrete Overlays. In Portland Cement Concrete Modifiers, Transportation Research Record no. 1204, pp. 52–58. Washington, DC: TRB.
16. Kuhlmann, L. 1991. Cracks in LMC Overlays: How Do They Get There; How Serious Are They; What to Do About Them. Transportation Research Record no. 1301, pp. 17–21. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
17. Buchanan, Patricia M. 2002. Shrinkage of Latex-Modified and Micro-silica Concrete Overlay Mixtures. Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blackburg, VA.
18. Walters, D. G. 1991. Styrene-Butadiene Latex-Modified Concrete (S-B LMC) Bridge-Deck Overlays. International Community on Polymers in Concrete working papers, North American Workshop, September 24, 1991, to September 27, 1991, San Francisco, CA.
19. ASTM Subcommittee C09.66. 2005. Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. ASTM C1202-05. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
20. Mokarem, D. W., R. M. Meyerson, and R. E. Weyers. 2003. Development of Concrete Shrinkage Performance Specifications. Final contact report VTRC 04-CR1. Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Transportation Research Council.