Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Prevalence and correlates of physical fighting among school-going adolescents in Santiago, Chile

Prevalencia e correlaciones de la lucha física entre adolescentes escolares en Santiago de Chile, Chile

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing interest in injury as a public health issue across the world. There is paucity of data on the prevalence and social correlates of non-fatal interpersonal violence in low- and middle-income income nations. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of, and associated factors for physical fighting among school-going adolescents in Santiago, Chile. METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Chilean Global School-Based Health Survey conducted in 2004 in Santiago. We aimed to assess the prevalence and social correlates of having been involved in a physical fight in the prior 12 months. RESULTS: Of the 2111 respondents, 40.7% (54.3% males and 26.6% females) reported having been in a physical fight in the prior 12 months. Males were more likely to have been in a physical fight than females [OR = 3.89, 95% CI (3.11, 4.85)]. Substance use (cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol, and using drugs) and bullying victimization were positively associated with fighting [OR = 3.05, 95% CI (2.40, 3.87) for substance use, and OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.32, 2.05) for bullying]. Parental supervision was negatively associated with physical fighting [OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.50, 0.78)]. CONCLUSION: We have estimated the prevalence of having engaged in a physical fight among in-school adolescents in Santiago, Chile. We have found that the prevalence is similar to what has been reported in diverse settings in Africa, Europe and North America.

Chile; Adolescent behavior; Mental health; Violence; School health


OBJETIVO: Existe un creciente interés en el daño como un asunto de salud pública a través del mundo. Hay escasez de datos en la prevalencia y correlaciones sociales de violencia interpersonal no fatal, en naciones con bajos y medianos ingresos. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la prevalencia y el factor asociado a lucha física entre estudiantes adolescentes en Santiago, Chile. MÉTODO: Hemos conducido un análisis secundario de la Encuesta Global Chilena de Salud Basada en Escuelas, realizada en el 2004 en Santiago. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la prevalencia y correlaciones sociales de haber estado involucrado en agresión física en los pasados 12 meses. RESULTADOS: De los 2111 respondedores, 40.7% (54.3% masculinos y 26.6% femeninos) reportaron haber estado en una agresión física en los pasados 12 meses. Los varones tuvieron más probabilidad de haber estado en una agresión física que las mujeres [OR = 3.89, 95% CI (3.11, 4.85)]. El uso de substancias (fumar cigarros, beber alcohol y usar drogas) e intimidaciones violentas estuvieron positivamente asociados con agresión [OR = 3.05, 95% CI (2.40, 3.87)] La supervisión parental estuvo asociada negativamente con agresión física [OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.50, 0.78)]. CONCLUSIÓN: Hemos estimado la prevalencia de haber estado involucrado en una agresión física entre adolescentes escolares en Santiago, Chile. Encontramos que la prevalencia es similar a la que ha sido reportada en diversos lugares en Africa, Europa y Norteamérica.

Chile; Conducta del adolescente; Salud mental; Violencia; Salud escolar


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Prevalence and correlates of physical fighting among school-going adolescents in Santiago, Chile

Prevalencia e correlaciones de la lucha física entre adolescentes escolares en Santiago de Chile, Chile

Emmanuel RudatsikiraI, II; Adamson S MuulaIII; Seter SiziyaIV

IDepartment of Global Health, Loma Linda University, School of Public Health, Loma Linda, California, USA

IIDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Loma Linda University, School of Public Health, Loma, Linda, California, USA

IIIDepartment of Community Health, University of Malawi, College of Medicine, Blantyre, Malawi

IVDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Zambia Medical School, Lusaka, Zambia

Correspondence Correspondence Adamson S. Muula Department of Community Health University of Malawi-College of Medicine Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi Phone: 265-1-671 911 Fax: 265-1-674 700 Email: muula@email.unc.edu

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is a growing interest in injury as a public health issue across the world. There is paucity of data on the prevalence and social correlates of non-fatal interpersonal violence in low- and middle-income income nations. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of, and associated factors for physical fighting among school-going adolescents in Santiago, Chile.

METHOD: We conducted a secondary analysis of the Chilean Global School-Based Health Survey conducted in 2004 in Santiago. We aimed to assess the prevalence and social correlates of having been involved in a physical fight in the prior 12 months.

RESULTS: Of the 2111 respondents, 40.7% (54.3% males and 26.6% females) reported having been in a physical fight in the prior 12 months. Males were more likely to have been in a physical fight than females [OR = 3.89, 95% CI (3.11, 4.85)]. Substance use (cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol, and using drugs) and bullying victimization were positively associated with fighting [OR = 3.05, 95% CI (2.40, 3.87) for substance use, and OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.32, 2.05) for bullying]. Parental supervision was negatively associated with physical fighting [OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.50, 0.78)].

CONCLUSION: We have estimated the prevalence of having engaged in a physical fight among in-school adolescents in Santiago, Chile. We have found that the prevalence is similar to what has been reported in diverse settings in Africa, Europe and North America.

Descriptors: Chile; Adolescent behavior; Mental health; Violence; School health

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Existe un creciente interés en el daño como un asunto de salud pública a través del mundo. Hay escasez de datos en la prevalencia y correlaciones sociales de violencia interpersonal no fatal, en naciones con bajos y medianos ingresos. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar la prevalencia y el factor asociado a lucha física entre estudiantes adolescentes en Santiago, Chile.

MÉTODO: Hemos conducido un análisis secundario de la Encuesta Global Chilena de Salud Basada en Escuelas, realizada en el 2004 en Santiago. Nuestro objetivo fue determinar la prevalencia y correlaciones sociales de haber estado involucrado en agresión física en los pasados 12 meses.

RESULTADOS: De los 2111 respondedores, 40.7% (54.3% masculinos y 26.6% femeninos) reportaron haber estado en una agresión física en los pasados 12 meses. Los varones tuvieron más probabilidad de haber estado en una agresión física que las mujeres [OR = 3.89, 95% CI (3.11, 4.85)]. El uso de substancias (fumar cigarros, beber alcohol y usar drogas) e intimidaciones violentas estuvieron positivamente asociados con agresión [OR = 3.05, 95% CI (2.40, 3.87)] La supervisión parental estuvo asociada negativamente con agresión física [OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.50, 0.78)].

CONCLUSIÓN: Hemos estimado la prevalencia de haber estado involucrado en una agresión física entre adolescentes escolares en Santiago, Chile. Encontramos que la prevalencia es similar a la que ha sido reportada en diversos lugares en Africa, Europa y Norteamérica.

Descriptores: Chile; Conducta del adolescente; Salud mental; Violencia; Salud escolar

Introduction

Interpersonal violence is an important global public health problem. In the United States, interpersonal violence against adolescents has been a leading cause of death and emergency hospital attendance among this age group.1,2 Violence-related injuries are defined as those that result from the intentional use of physical force or power against oneself, another person, or a group or community.3 Rachuba et al. and Zohoori et al. have reported that in Kingston, Jamaica, violence-related injuries were responsible for 11.5% of all recorded hospital visits in the public health system.4,5 Data from the Scottish Information and Statistics Division, Common Services Agency of the Scottish Health Service published by MacCallum et al.6 report that assault was the commonest cause of head injury among hospitalized male patients in Scotland. Assault was the leading cause of head injury among females aged 20 years or more.

Much of the research and reports on violence in Chile have been directed towards intimate partner violence against women.7-9 This is clearly an important public health issue in the country as some 41% of women reported having been physically abused by intimate partner in the prior 12 months.7,8

While the concern on adolescent physical fighting largely concern physical injury and deaths, physical fighting in itself is also a marker of other unhealthy lifestyles. Kuzman10 have reported that early sexual experience among Croatian adolescents was associated with history of physical fighting. Valois et al.11 have also reported that adolescents who had experienced physical fighting were also likely to have engaged in sexual intercourse. This association may not result from cause-effect relationship, but rather a clustering of unhealthy lifestyles in adolescents i.e. an adolescent who is exposed to one unhealthy lifestyle is more likely to be also exposed to other behaviors.

However, there has been limited research interest in middle- and low-income countries. In order to contribute to the literature on interpersonal violence in low- and middle income settings, we carried out a secondary analysis of the Chilean Metropolitan Region (Santiago) Global School-Based Health Survey (GSHS) conducted in 2004 to estimate the prevalence of physical fighting and identify its social correlates.

Method

1. The Global School Based Health Survey

The standard methodology of the Global School-Based Health Survey has been described elsewhere.12 The present study is based on a secondary analysis of the Chilean Global School-Based Health Survey (GSHS) conducted in 2004 in Santiago. A comprehensive description of the GSHS, with regard to its purpose, sampling strategy, study participant selection has been reported elsewhere.13 In brief, however, the GSHS is a cross sectional survey which uses a two-stage sampling technique. The survey has three main aims which are 1) to assist countries develop priorities, establish programmes, and advocate for resources for school health and youth health programmes and policies; 2) to allow various agencies, countries, and others stakeholders make comparisons across countries regarding the prevalence of health-related behaviours; and 3) to establish trends in the prevalence of behaviors that are relevant to health and associated that may be used in the evaluation of interventions to promote school and youth health.

2. Sampling of study participants

The aim of the GSHS is to collect data from 13-to-15 year olds in-school adolescents. In the case of Chile, age range was covered by grades 7 and 8 of primary school as well as first grade of secondary school. The survey used a cross-sectional two-stage survey sampling design. Eligible public and state-sponsored private schools comprised the sampling frame in the first stage of sampling. The probability of a school being selected was proportional to the enrolment size of the school in the selected grades. In the second stage of sampling, classrooms within the selected schools were randomly selected. All students present in the classrooms that had been selected were eligible to participate in the survey regardless of their actual ages. Only public schools and state-sponsored private schools were eligible for participation. All schools that were eligible participated, while 85% of the eligible students participated in the study. The Ministry of Health was in charge of the survey in Chile, with the technical assistance of CDC (Atlanta, Georgia, United States).

3. Ethical considerations and questionnaire administration

Survey questionnaires were anonymously completed by all students who volunteered to be included in the survey. A self-completed, computer scannable questionnaire was used for data collection. We mean a questionnaire was self completed by the students and the questionnaire had already been prepared that it could be scanned thereafter.

4. Questionnaire administration

Students were asked many questions but for the purposes of the current study, the following variables were of interest: whether they had engaged in a physical fight in the prior 12 months; how many times in the prior 30 days they had been bullied; alcohol, cigarette and illicit drug use; and other sociodemographic variables.

5. Choice of variables

We were interested in the prevalence and social correlates of having engaged in physical fighting in the prior 12 months. The Chilean GSHS also collected data from other areas but the data from those areas were not the focus in the current study. Identification of the relevant explanatory variables was largely based on review of the literature which showed that the following variables had been identified to be associated with physical fighting or other unhealthy behaviors: cigarette smoking;12,14 male gender;15,16 alcohol use;12,17,18 bullying victimization19 and illicit drugs.20,21 Parental supervision and support of the adolescent have been reported as protective22,23

Previous research has suggested that traditional masculine gender socialization and social norms models seem to encourage men to engage in behaviours that put their health at risk.10,24 Males may be more likely to engage in fighting because society may be more likely to be tolerant towards male fighting than fighting in which females are involved. Individuals who use substances such as alcohol or illicit drugs may be involved in fights due to several reasons. Some substances such as alcohol may have a disinhibiting effect when used. Previous research has reported that the disinhibiting effect of alcohol may be associated with violence, unsafe sexual practices and unsafe driving.25-29 Furthermore, individuals who engage in alcohol use and illicit drugs may also be exposed to environments where anti-social behaviours such as fighting are likely to occur.

Individuals who are victimized through bullying may be more likely to be engaged in physical fighting should they attempt to defend themselves.30 Previous researches from the United States have also reported that among adolescents who have previously been victimized, these are likely to carry weapons to schools.31,32

Adolescents who are not regularly supervised by parents may be exposed to environments that may be more conducive to fighting. It is less likely that adolescents would engage in physical fighting in the presence of their parents.

6. Data analysis

Data were analyzed using SUDAAN software version 9 (Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America). A weighting factor was used in the analysis to reflect the likelihood of sampling each student and to reduce bias by compensating for differing patterns of non response.33

We assessed the prevalence of various relevant sociodemographic variables stratified by age. These are reported in Table 1. We also conducted logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between the outcome variable (having engaged in a physical fight) and predictor variables. In bivariate logistic regression analysis, unadjusted odds ratios were obtained and these are reported in Table 2. Furthermore, multivariable analyses were conducted with each of the predictor variables reported in Table 2 as the main exposure while controlling for the rest of the predictor variables as co-variates. The results of the multivariable analyses are reported as adjusted odds ratios in Table 3.

Results

Table 1 presents selected characteristics of the study population of 2111 school-going adolescents in Santiago, Chile (median age 14 years old, Q1: 11-13 years, Q3: 15 years, with 1 and 3 in the Qs being subscripts). Most of the sample was male (51.1%), 14 years old (31.5%), non-smokers (70.2%), non-alcohol drinkers (67.0%) and with parental supervision (55.6). Overall, 40.7% (54.3% males and 26.6% females) reported having been in a physical fight in the prior 12 months.

Table 2 indicates that male subjects were more likely to be in a physical fight than females [OR = 3.28, 95% CI (2.71, 3.96)]. Subjects who reported substance use (cigarette smoking, alcohol or drug use) were more likely to be in a physical fight than non-substance users [OR = 2.41, 95% CI (1.81, 3.20) for males and OR = 4.12, 95% CI (2.99, 5.68) for females]. Compared to nonsmokers, subjects who smoked cigarettes were more likely to be in a physical fighting [OR = 1.78, 95% CI (1.31, 2.44) for males and OR = 3.81, 95% CI (2.82, 5.16) for females]. Those who reported drinking alcohol were more likely to engage in physical fighting than those who did not [OR = 2.37, 95% CI (1.76, 3.19) for males and OR = 3.05, 95% CI (2.27, 4.09) for females]. Bullying victimization was positively associated with physical fighting for both males and females [OR = 1.73, 95% CI (1.32, 2.29) for males and OR = 1.93, 95% CI (1.44, 2.57) for females]. Subjects who had parental supervision were less likely to be in a physical fight than those who had no parental supervision [OR = 0.63, 95% CI (0.48, 0.82) for males and OR = 0.41, 95% (0.31, 0.55) for females].

Table 3 presents results from multivariate analysis. Male gender, substance use (cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol, and drug use) and bullying victimization remained positively associated with physical fighting. Likewise, parental supervision remained negatively associated with physical fighting. In the factor analysis, the final communality estimate for cigarette smoking, alcohol and drug use was 1.35, which is an indication of high inter-correlation between the three variables.

Discussion

We estimated the overall prevalence of having engaged in a physical fight in the last 12 months among in-school adolescents in Santiago at 40.7%. Girls were less likely to have been involved in a fight than males by about 50% (26.6% versus 54.3%). The prevalence estimate obtained from this study is closer to the 50.6% reported by Rudatsikira et al.12 among a similar age-group in Namibia. In the Namibian study, although males were also more likely to have engaged in fights than females, the gender gap was smaller (55.2% and 46.2% among boys and girls respectively). In a study involving 37,571 11-15-years-old in-school adolescents conducted in 2001/2002 in 9 different countries, Pickett reported that the prevalence of boys involved in physical fighting during the previous year ranged from 37% in Finland to 69% in the Czech Republic.34 The overall average prevalence was 58%. Among girls, the prevalence of physical fighting was much lower ranging from 13% in Finland to 32% in Hungary and an overall average of 24%. The majority of countries reporting the highest prevalence of physical fighting by boys were from Eastern or Central Europe.34 Our estimates from Chile appear to be within the usual range of prevalence that has been reported elsewhere.

The male predominance in prevalence of physical fighting may be explained by the normative belief of masculinity among males.16,35 Society may be more permissive towards male than female fighting behavior. Evidence from the literature suggests that in general males are more likely to lead unhealthy lifestyles in diverse areas such as tobacco smoking36 and alcohol use.37

We found that history of having engaged in a fight was associated with substance use (alcohol, illicit drugs and cigarette smoking) as have been previously reported elsewhere.12 This clustering of unhealthy behaviors is important to recognize if holistic intervention programs aimed at adolescents' unhealthy lifestyles are to be effectively reduced. Springer et al.38 have reported that students with low levels of parental support were more likely to engage in unhealthy behaviors. Adolescents' unsupervised time has been described as an important determinant of adolescents engaging in unhealthy, including antisocial behaviors while adult supervision is protective.39-40 It is important also to recognize that as a study based on cross-sectionally collected data, it is not possible to ascribe causation to any of the associated factors.41 For instance, it is possible that unsupervised time may enable adolescents to start experimenting with drugs. Alternatively, adolescents who are already substance users may actively seek unsupervised time in order to perform their behaviors.

The findings from this study suggest that efforts to reduce adolescent substance use (illicit drugs, alcohol and cigarette smoking) may also reduce adolescents' exposure to physical fighting. This may be due to the fact that situations where substance use is likely to occur may also exist where fighting occurs. Parents should be encouraged to supervise their children because, doing that seems to prevent them from engaging in a host of antisocial behaviours.42,43 Furthermore, there is need to make schools and neighborhoods safer for adolescents not to be involved in fighting and bullying. School regulations, staff supervision and a supportive environment have all been reported to discourage adolescent victimization.44,45

Limitations of the study

Our study had several limitations. Firstly this study recruited adolescents from school, and out-of-school adolescents were excluded. Therefore, the findings from the study while aimed to be representative of the in-school adolescents within the selected age groups may not be readily applicable to out-of school. It is possible out-of school adolescents may have different behavioral patterns when compared to their in-school adolescents. However, in Chile the coverage of primary education reaches 99.1%, being 92.6% in the case of secondary education. This means that there are only few school-age adolescents who do not attend school. Also, the Global School-Health Survey relies on self-reported behaviors. Adolescent may intentionally report or may have forgotten that they engaged in a particular behavior in the stated time period. Of note also, the study used data collected from Santiago which may not be representative of the rest of the country.

The questions seeking information on physical fighting and substance use may be perceived as sensitive by some study participants. The GSHS attempts to minimize intentional misreporting by requiring anonymous completion of the questionnaire. To what extent such provision allowed adolescents to accurately report their behaviors is not known. Brener et al.,46,47 however, has reported that among United States adolescents, the reliability of a questionnaire aimed at collecting data similar to the GSHS was high. Again, it is not known how reliable such a survey instrument would be in the Chilean setting.

Conclusion

We have estimated the prevalence of having engaged in a physical fight among in-school adolescents in Santiago, Chile. We have found that the prevalence is similar to what has been reported in diverse settings in Africa, Europe and North America. There is need to explore the effectiveness of school-based intervention programs.48 Efforts to prevent adolescent unhealthy behaviors may be more effective if the clustering of behaviors among adolescents is considered.

Acknowledgements

We thank the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-CDC (Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America) for making the data available for our analysis. We also thank all the students who participated in the Chile Global School-Based Health Survey in 2004. The authors are responsible for the analysis and interpretations in the paper and both the WHO and CDC had no part in the analysis, interpretation and drafting of manuscript, nor the decision to publish the findings. We would also like to thank the following people who made up the national research team: Dr. Bárbara Medina, Ing. Andrea Guerrero, Dr. Jorge Szot, Mat. Mónica Chiu and Mat. Alejandra Burgos and Claudia W. Gonzalez, Head of Epidemiology, Division of Planning, Ministry of Health, Chile.

Disclosures

Submitted: October 15, 2007

Accpeted: April 5, 2008

  • 1. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Ross J, Hawkins J, Harris WA, Lowry R, McManus T, Chyen D, Shanklin S, Lim C, Grunbaum JA, Wechsler H. Youth risk behavior surveillance--United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55(5):1-108.
  • 2. Cheng TL, Johnson S, Wright JL, Pearson-Fields AS, Brenner R, Schwarz D, O'Donnell R, Scheidt PC. Assault-injured adolescents presenting to the emergency department: causes and circumstances. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(6):610-6.
  • 3. Corso PS, Mercy JA, Simon TR, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. Medical costs and productivity losses due to interpersonal and self-directed violence in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(6):474-82.
  • 4. Rachuba L, Stanton B, Howard D. Violent crime in the United States. An epidemiologic profile. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149(9):953-60.
  • 5. Zohoori N, Ward E, Gordon G, Wilks R, Ashley D, Forrester T. Non-fatal violence-related injuries in Kingston, Jamaica: a preventable drain on resources. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2002;9(4):255-62.
  • 6. MacCallum H, Morrison A, Stone DH, Murray K. Non-fatal head injury among Scottish young people: the importance of assault. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(1):77-8.
  • 7. Bangdiwala SI, Ramiro L, Sadowski LS, Bordin IA, Hunter W, Shankar V. Intimate partner violence and the role of socioeconomic indicators in WorldSAFE communities in Chile, Egypt, India and the Philippines. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004;11(2):101-9.
  • 8. Hassan F, Sadowski LS, Bangdiwala SI, Vizcarra B, Ramiro L, De Paula CS, Bordin IA, Mitra MK. Physical intimate partner violence in Chile, Egypt, India and the Philippines. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004 11(2):111-6.
  • 9. Jeyaseelan L, Sadowski LS, Kumar S, Hassan F, Ramiro L, Vizcarra B. World studies of abuse in the family environment--risk factors for physical intimate partner violence. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2004;11(2):117-24.
  • 10. Kuzman M, Simetin IP, Franelic IP. Early sexual intercourse and risk factors in Croatian adolescents. Coll Antropol 2007;31 Suppl 2:121-30.
  • 11. Valois RF, McKeown RE, Garrison CZ, Vincent ML. Correlates of aggressive and violent behaviors among public high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16(1):26-34.
  • 12. Rudatsikira E, Siziya S, Kazembe LN, Muula AS. Prevalence and associated factors of physical fighting among school-going adolescents in Namibia. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2007;6:18.
  • 13
    World Health Organization (2007). Global School-Based Health Survey accessed on 5th September 2007 from: http://www.who.int/chp/gshs/methodology/en/ index.html
  • 14. Lee LK, Paul CY, Kam CW, Jagmohni K. Smoking among secondary school students in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2005;17(2):130-6.
  • 15. Gofin R, Palti H, Mandel M. Fighting among Jerusalem adolescents: personal and school-related factors. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27(3):218-23.
  • 16. Mahalik JR, Burns SM, Syzdek M. Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men's health behaviors. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(11):2201-9
  • 17. Shepherd JP, Sutherland I, Newcombe RG. Relations between alcohol, violence and victimization in adolescence. J Adolesc. 2006;29(4):539-53.
  • 18. Swahn MH, Donovan JE. Alcohol and violence: comparison of the psychosocial correlates of adolescent involvement in alcohol-related physical fighting versus other physical fighting. Addict Behav. 2006; 31(11):2014-29.
  • 19. Nansel TR, Overpeck MD, Haynie DL, Ruan WJ, Scheidt PC. Relationships between bullying and violence among US youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(4):348-53.
  • 20. Lowry R, Cohen LR, Modzeleski W, Kann L, Collins JL, Kolbe LJ. School violence, substance use, and availability of illegal drugs on school property among US high school students. J Sch Health. 1999;69(9):347-55
  • 21. Vanderschmidt HF, Lang JM, Knight-Williams V, Vanderschmidt GF. Risks among inner-city young teens: the prevalence of sexual activity, violence, drugs, and smoking. J Adolesc Health. 1993;14(4):282-8.
  • 22. Haapasalo J, Tremblay RE. Physically aggressive boys from ages 6 to 12: family background, parenting behavior, and prediction of delinquency. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(5):1044-52.
  • 23. Springer AE, Sharma S, de Guardado AM, Nava FV, Kelder SH. Perceived parental monitoring and health risk behavior among public secondary school students in El Salvador. Scientific World Journal. 2006;6:1810-4.
  • 24. Mahalik JR, Burns SM, Syzdek M. Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviors as predictors of men's health behavior. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(11):2201-9.
  • 25. Pihl RO. Personality disorders, behavioral disinhibition, and addiction: a commentary. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(6):551-2.
  • 26. Davey JD, Davey T, Obst PL. Drug and drink driving by university students: an exploration of the influence of attitudes. Traffic Inj Prev. 2005;6(1):44-52.
  • 27. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Jooste S, Cain D. Frequency, quantity, and contextual use of alcohol among sexually transmitted infection clinic patients in Cape Town, South Africa. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(5):687-98.
  • 28. Rose AK, Duka T. The influence of alcohol on basic motoric and cognitive disinhibition. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42(6):544-51.
  • 29. Kongnyuy EJ, Wiysonge CS. Alcohol use and extramarital sex among men in Cameroon. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2007;7:6.
  • 30. Rudatsikira E, Singh P, Job J, Knutsen S. Variables associated with weapon-carrying among young adolescents in southern California. J Adolesc Health 2007;40(5):470-3.
  • 31. Sullivan TN, Farrell AD, Kliewer W. Peer victimization in early adolescence: association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Dev Psycholpathol. 2006;18(1):119-37.
  • 32. Dowdell EB, Santucci ME. The relationship between health risk behaviors and fear in one urban seventh grade class. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18(3):187-94.
  • 33. Global Youth Tobacco Survey Collaborative Group. Tobacco use among youth: a cross country comparison. Tob Control. 2002;11(3):252-70.
  • 34. Pickett W, Craig W, Harel Y, Cunningham J, Simpson K, Molcho M, Mazur J, Dostaler S, Overpeck MD, Currie CE; HBSC Violence and Injuries Writing Group. Cross-national study of fighting and weapon carrying as determinants of adolescent injury. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):e855-63.
  • 35. Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003;58(1):5-14.
  • 36. Dawson KA, Schneider MA, Fletcher PC, Bryden PJ. Examining gender differences in the health behaviors of Canadian university students. J R Soc Health. 2007;127(1):38-44.
  • 37. de Vries H, van't Riet J, Panday S, Reubsaet A. Access point analysis in smoking and nonsmoking adolescents: findings from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2007;16(3):257-65.
  • 38. Springer A, Parcel G, Baumler E, Ross M. Supportive social relationships and adolescent health risk behavior among secondary school students in El Salvador. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1628-40.
  • 39. Henry KL, Huizinga DH. Truancy's effect on the onset of drug use among urban adolescents placed at risk. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(4):358.e9-17.
  • 40. Tebes JK, Feinn R, Vanderploeg JJ, Chinman MJ, Shepard J, Brabham T, Genovese M, Connell C. Impact of a positive youth development program in urban after-school settings on the prevention of adolescent substance use. J Adolesc Health 2007;41(3):239-47.
  • 41. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S144-50.
  • 42. Alexander M, Garda L, Kanade S, Jejeebhoy S, Ganatra B. Correlates of premarital relationships among unmarried youth in Pune District, Maharashtra, India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007;33(4):150-9.
  • 43. Garmiene A, Zemaitiene N, Zaborskis A. Family time, parental behaviour model and the initiation of smoking and alcohol use by ten-year-old children: an epidemiological study in Kaunas, Lithuania. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:287.
  • 44. Srabstein JC, McCarter RJ, Shao C, Huang ZJ. Morbidities associated with bullying behaviors in adolescents. School based study of American adolescents. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2006;18(4):587-96.
  • 45. Fekkes M, Pijpers FI, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(6):638-44.
  • 46. Brener ND, Collins JL, Kann L, Warren CW, Williams BI. Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(6):575-80.
  • 47. Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, Kinchen SA, Sundberg EC, Ross JG. Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health 2002;31(4):336-42.
  • 48. Hahn R, Fuqua-Whitley D, Wethington H, Lowy J, Liberman A, Crosby A, Fullilove M, Johnson R, Moscicki E, Price L, Snyder SR, Tuma F, Cory S, Stone G, Mukhopadhaya K, Chattopadhyay S, Dahlberg L; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The effectiveness of universal school-based programs for the prevention of violent and aggressive behavior: a report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56(RR-7):1-12.
  • Correspondence

    Adamson S. Muula
    Department of Community Health
    University of Malawi-College of Medicine
    Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi
    Phone: 265-1-671 911 Fax: 265-1-674 700
    Email:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      25 Sept 2008
    • Date of issue
      Sept 2008

    History

    • Received
      15 Oct 2007
    • Accepted
      05 Apr 2008
    Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria Rua Pedro de Toledo, 967 - casa 1, 04039-032 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5081-6799, Fax: +55 11 3384-6799, Fax: +55 11 5579-6210 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: editorial@abp.org.br