Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2019, 64(3):118-129 | DOI: 10.17221/104/2017-CJAS

Effect of inbreeding on fertility traits in five dog breedsOriginal Paper

Joanna Kania-Gierdziewicz*, Sylwia Pałka
Department of Genetics and Animal Breeding, University of Agriculture, Krakow, Poland

The aim of the study was to analyze retrospectively the influence of inbreeding on fertility traits in five dog breeds: German Shepherd dog (GSD), Golden (GR) and Labrador (LR) Retrievers, Beagle and the Tatra Shepherd dog (TSD). The data were 436 litters, with the total of 2560 puppies: 1307 males and 1206 females. The parents of the litters were 163 dogs and 228 bitches. For each litter the litter size, number of male and female puppies, sex ratio, and sex difference were calculated. The fixed effects of breed, of litter birth year and linear regression coefficients on litter and parents' inbreeding were included in the linear model for litter traits. The correlations between litter traits and litter parents' inbreeding were also estimated. The average litter size was 5.87 (± 2.53) for all breeds. GSD had the smallest average litter size differences in years and the lowest fluctuations of sex ratio with litter size. In other dog breeds those differences were much bigger. The difference between the number of male and female offspring in a litter depended on the breed. The lowest percentage of inbred parents was found for LR, and the highest for TSD. Mating non-inbred animals, in most cases also unrelated, was frequent in all breeds. The inbreeding level of parents had significant influence on the litter traits only for TSD. For the Beagles low, positive and significant correlation between the number of female offspring in a litter and the dam's inbreeding level and the sex ratio below 0.5 suggests sex ratio disturbance. The correlation coefficients between litter inbreeding and litter size for majority of examined dog breeds were positive but not significant. The conclusion is that in Poland at first obligatory monitoring of the inbreeding level for all breeds should be applied.

Keywords: dog; reproduction; litter size; sex ratio; inbreeding effect

Published: March 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kania-Gierdziewicz J, Pałka S. Effect of inbreeding on fertility traits in five dog breeds. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2019;64(3):118-129. doi: 10.17221/104/2017-CJAS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Supplementary files:

    Download file104-2017 Kania SOM.pdf

    File size: 431.63 kB

    References

    1. Bobic Gavrilovic B., Andersson K., Linde Forsberg C. (2008): Reproductive patterns in the domestic dog - A retrospective study of Drever breed. Theriogenology, 70, 783-794. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Boichard D., Maignel L., Verrier E. (1997): The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics Selection Evolution, 29, 5-23. Go to original source...
    3. Borge K.S., Tonnessen R., Nodtvedt A., Indrebo A. (2011): Litter size at birth in purebred dogs - A retrospective study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology, 75, 911-919. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Calboli F.C.F., Sampson J., Fretwell N., Balding D.J. (2008): Population structure and inbreeding from pedigree analysis of purebred dogs. Genetics, 179, 593-601. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Dolf G., Gaillard C., Schelling C., Hofer A., Leighton E. (2008): Cryptorchidism and sex ratio are associated in dogs and pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 2480-2485. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Gierdziewicz M., Kania-Gierdziewicz J., Kalinowska B. (2011): Analysis of genetic structure of the Beagle population in the area of Cracow Branch of the Polish Kennel Club. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 29, 359-367.
    7. Gubbels E.J., Scholten J., Janss L., Rothuizen J. (2009): Relationship of cryptorchidism with sex ratios and litter sizes in 12 dog breeds. Animal Reproduction Science, 113, 187-195. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Hedhammar A., Indrebo A. (2011): Rules, regulations, strategies and activities within the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) to promote canine genetic health. The Veterinary Journal, 189, 141-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Hedhammar A., Malm S., Bonnett B. (2011): International and collaborative strategies to enhance genetic health in purebred dogs. The Veterinary Journal, 189, 189-196. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Kania-Gierdziewicz J. (2013): Analysis of population genetic structure as a tool to preserve genetic resources - a review. Wiadomości Zootechniczne, 51, 107-120. (in Polish)
    11. Kania-Gierdziewicz J., Kalinowska B., Gierdziewicz M. (2011): Inbreeding and relationship in the German Shepherd dog population in area of Cracow Branch of Polish Kennel Club. Scientific Annals of Polish Society of Animal Production, 7, 21-29.
    12. Kania-Gierdziewicz J., Gierdziewicz M., Kalinowska B. (2014): Inbreeding and relationship analysis of the Golden and Labrador Retriever populations in the Cracow Branch of the Polish Kennel Club. Scientific Annals of Polish Society of Animal Production, 10, 9-19. (in Polish)
    13. Kania-Gierdziewicz J., Gierdziewicz M., Budzynski B. (2015): Genetic structure analysis of Tatra Shepherd dog population from Tatra Mountain region. Annals of Animal Science, 15, 323-335. Go to original source...
    14. Leroy G., Baumung R. (2010): Mating practices and the dissemination of genetic disorders in domestic animals, based on the example of dog breeding. Animal Genetics, 42, 66-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Leroy G., Rognon X., Varlet A., Joffrin C., Verrier E. (2006): Genetic variability in French dog breeds assessed by pedigree data. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 123, 1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Leroy G., Phocas F., Hedan B., Verrier E., Rognon X. (2015): Inbreeding impact on litter size and survival in selected canine breeds. The Veterinary Journal, 203, 74-78. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Maki K. (2010): Population structure and genetic diversity of worldwide Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever and Lancashire Heeler dog populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 127, 318-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Mandigers P.J.J., Ubbink G.J., Van den Broek J., Bouw J. (1994): Relationship between litter size and other reproductive traits in the Dutch Kooiker dog. Veterinary Quarterly, 16, 229-232. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Mostert B.E., van Marle-Koster E., Visser C., Oosthuizen M. (2015): Genetic analysis of pre-weaning survival and inbreeding in the Boxer dog breed of South Africa. South African Journal of Animal Science, 45, 476-484. Go to original source...
    20. Nicolas F.W., Wade C.M. (2011): Canine genetics: A very special issue. The Veterinary Journal, 189, 123-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Nielen A.L.J., van der Beek S., Ubbink G.J., Knol B.W. (2001): Epidemiology: Population parameters to compare dog breeds: Differences between five Dutch purebred populations. Veterinary Quarterly, 23, 43-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Olafsdottir G.A., Kristjansson T. (2008): Correlated pedigree and molecular estimates of inbreeding and their ability to detect inbreeding depression in the Icelandic sheepdog, a recently bottlenecked population of domestic dogs. Conservation Genetics, 9, 1639-1641. Go to original source...
    23. Oliehoek P.A., Bijma P., van der Meijden A. (2009): History and structure of the closed pedigreed population of Icelandic Sheepdogs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 41, 39-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    24. Rozanska-Zawieja J., Nienartowicz-Zdrojewska A., Mucha M., Sobek Z., Stanislawski D., Gierdziewicz M., Kania-Gierdziewicz J. (2013): Evaluation of inbreeding and relationship coefficients in Hovawart dogs and analysis of trends in coat colour changes. Annals of Animal Science, 13, 253-262. Go to original source...
    25. Sichtar J., Dokoupilova A., Vostry L., Rajmon R., Jilek F. (2016): Factors affecting reproductive efficiency in German Shepherd bitches producing litters for Police of the Czech Republic. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 61, 578-585. Go to original source...
    26. Shariflou M.R., James J.W., Nicolas F.W., Wade C.M. (2011): A genealogical survey of Australian registered dog breeds. The Veterinary Journal, 198, 203-210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Tonnessen R., Borge K.S., Nodtvedt A., Indrebo A. (2012): Canine perinatal mortality: A cohort study of 224 breeds. Theriogenology, 77, 1788-1801. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Urfer S.R. (2009): Inbreeding and fertility in Irish Wolfhounds in Sweden: 1976 to 2007. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 51, 21-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Voges S., Distl O. (2009): Inbreeding trends and pedigree analysis of Bavarian mountain hounds, Hanoverian hounds and Tyrolean hounds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 126, 357-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Wang S., Leroy G., Malm S., Lewis T., Strandberg E., Fikse W.F. (2016): Merging pedigree databases to describe and compare mating practices and gene flow between pedigree dogs in France, Sweden and UK. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 134, 152-161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Windig J.J., Oldenbroek K. (2015): Genetic management of Dutch golden retriever dogs with a simulation tool. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 132, 428-440. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content