Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(1):43-50 | DOI: 10.17221/106/2018-AGRICECON

Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in AndalusiaOriginal Paper

Mercedes Rodriguez*, Luis Miguel Sanchez, Eugenio Cejudo, Jose Antonio Camacho
Institute of Regional Development, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

For the period 2007-2013 LEADER became the fourth axis of rural development policy. One of the main characteristics of LEADER is that it adopts a bottom-up approach. Local Action Groups (LAGs) have to define and implement area-based local development strategies (LDSs). In this paper, we examine the relationship between variety in the LDSs implemented by LAGs and employment safeguarding over the programming period 2007-2013 in Andalusia, the most populated region of Spain. Firstly, we construct several indicators to capture differences in the number of projects carried out, the grants awarded, the investments made and the safeguarded employment. Secondly, we carry out an exploratory factor analysis. We use cluster analysis to classify LAGs applying similar LDSs. The results obtained show that there is no ideal strategy for employment safeguarding and that spending high amounts of money in a few numbers of projects does not guarantee success. Thus, most LAGs do not show any clear specialisation pattern but obtain moderate results in terms of employment safeguarding. This supports the idea that LAGs need to have sufficient flexibility to find a balance among the different objectives of the rural development policy and to translate this balance into the funding of projects.

Keywords: ocal action groups; rural development; strategy

Published: January 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rodriguez M, Sanchez LM, Cejudo E, Camacho JA. Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(1):43-50. doi: 10.17221/106/2018-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Supplementary files:

    Download file106-018 Rodriguez et al ESM.pdf

    File size: 312.59 kB

    References

    1. Bosworth G., Annibal I., Carroll T., Price L., Sellick J., Shepherd J. (2016): Empowering local action through neoendogenous development: the case of leader in England. Sociologia Ruralis, 56: 427-449. Go to original source...
    2. Boukalova K., Koralova A., Lostak M. (2016): Tracing shift in Czech rural development paradigm (Reflections of Local Action Groups in the media). Agricultural Economics - Czech, 62: 149-159. Go to original source...
    3. Cañete J.A., Navarro F., Cejudo E. (2018): Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain). European Planning Studies, 26: 726-744. Go to original source...
    4. Convery I., Soane I., Dutson T., Shaw H. (2010): Mainstreaming LEADER delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50: 370-391. Go to original source...
    5. Dax T., Oedl-Wieser T. (2016): Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives - An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118: 30-37. Go to original source...
    6. Dax T., Strahl W., Kirwan J., Maye D. (2016): The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23: 56-68. Go to original source...
    7. Delin M. (2012): The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 58: 433-442. Go to original source...
    8. Esparcia J., Escribano J., Serrano J. (2015): From development to power relations and territorial governance: Increasing the leadership role of LEADER Local Action Groups in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 42: 29-42. Go to original source...
    9. European Commission (2017): Ex post evaluation of rural development programmes 2007-2013. Information Report. European Economic and Social Committee.
    10. European Court of Auditors (2010): Implementation of the leader approach for rural development. Special Report No. 5/2010, Brussels. Available at http://eca.europa.eu/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/7912812.PDF (accessed March 5, 2018).
    11. General Secretary of Agriculture and Food of Andalusia (2018): SEGGES.DOS information system. Junta de Andalucía, Seville.
    12. Lošťák M., Hudečková H. (2010): Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 249-265. Go to original source...
    13. Navarro F.A., Woods M., Cejudo E. (2016): The LEADER initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The Cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis, 56: 270-288. Go to original source...
    14. OECD (2006): The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. OECD, Paris.
    15. Papadopoulou E., Hasanagas N., Harvey D. (2011): Analysis of rural development policy networks in Greece: Is LEADER really different? Land Use Policy, 28: 663-673. Go to original source...
    16. Pollermann K., Raue P., Schnaut G. (2013): Rural Development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 115: 111-117. Go to original source...
    17. Thuesen A.A. (2010): Is LEADER elitist or inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG boards in the 2007-2013 rural development and fisheries programmes. Sociologia Ruralis, 50: 31-45. Go to original source...
    18. Volk A., Bojnec Š. (2014): Local action groups and the LEADER co-financing of rural development projects in Slovenia. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 60: 364-375. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content