Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2018, 64(10):456-463 | DOI: 10.17221/138/2017-AGRICECON

Is economic institutional adaptation feasible for agri-environmental policy? Case of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition standardsReview

Jana POLAKOVA*
Department of Agroecology and Biometeorology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

This review focuses on Czech implementation of standards for soil and water protection called Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions (GAEC), with linkage to the European Union (EU) level. I investigate different elements of adaptive institutional economics: (i) summarise current knowledge regarding the social reasons for introducing GAEC; (ii) assess the evidence linked to GAEC to better understand the potential as well as boundaries of formalizing cause-effect links; (iii) clarify the pertinence of producers' claims on costs accruing from GAEC implementation. These three points highlight the thesis of this paper: implementation in farmers' practices of the theoretical concept of sustainability in terms of bridging together economics, society and the environment. The economic reasoning for GAEC introduction within adaptive institutional economics stems from the relational positioning of the knowledge of the costs of the impact of agricultural land use on other characteristic rural land uses. GAEC are needed, albeit the size of support obtained by producers surpasses the costs of complying; therefore, the result pays off for farms. We have learned that GAEC implementation is important from regional to EU levels and that its role is more related to economic institutional adaptation than to regulation. Adaptation of institutional economics is therefore feasible, making it possible to understand GAEC as a network which manages and enables knowledge transfer linked directly to regulation. Institutional economics can link sustainability with farmers' practices and accounts for the behaviour of the farmers. In this review, I find that, for society, it is necessary to require measurement of agri-environmental outcomes for water resources, soil and biodiversity through GAEC at appropriate scales. These scales are likely to be relevant to adaptive institutional economy localities perceived by the rural public.

Keywords: groundwater protection, producers, rural development

Published: October 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
POLAKOVA J. Is economic institutional adaptation feasible for agri-environmental policy? Case of Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition standards. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2018;64(10):456-463. doi: 10.17221/138/2017-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Addiscott T. (1991): Farming, Fertilisers and the Nitrate Problem. CAB International, Wallingford.
    2. Anon (2013): Program rozvoje venkova 2007-2013. Available at http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/dotace/program-rozvoje-venkova-na-obdobi-2007/programove-dokumenty/program-rozvoje-venkova-cr-puvodni.html (accessed Dec 23, 2016). (in Czech)
    3. Bio Intelligence Service (2010): Environmental Impacts of Different Crop Rotations in the European Union. Report to Directorate General Environment. Bio Intelligence Service, Paris.
    4. Boatman N., Gosling J., Ramwell C. (2009): Quantifying the Environmental Impacts of the Campaign for the Farmed Environment - Final Report. The Food and Environment Research Agency, York.
    5. Brouwer F., Walker A., Hoste R., van Wagenberg C. (2011): Literature Study on the Cost of Compliance with EU Legislation in the Fields of Environment, Food Safety and Animal Welfare. Unpublished report of the European Commission. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Wageningen UR, the Hague.
    6. Bruckmeier K., Tovey H. (2008): Knowledge in sustainable rural development: from forms of knowledge to knowledge processes. Sociologia Ruralis, 48: 313-329. Go to original source...
    7. Cao Y., Elliott J., Jones G., Simpson D., Boatman N., Laybourn R., Northing P., Ramwell C., Turley D., van Driel K., Condlifee I., Dennis E., Dwyer J., Mills J. (2009): Evaluation of Cross Compliance. Report for Department of Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs (Defra). ADAS, Leeds.
    8. Coase R. (1994): Institucionální uspořádání výroby. In: Jonáš J. (ed.): Oslava ekonomie: přednášky laureátů Nobelovy ceny za ekonomii. Academia, Praha. (in Czech)
    9. Commission of the European Communities (2001): A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: a European Strategy for Sustainable Development. Commission of the European Communities, Göteborg.
    10. Commission of the European Communities (2013): Staff Working Document: Reporting as Regards Implementation of Nitrates Directive 91/676/EEC for the 2008-2011 Period, SWD (2013) 405. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
    11. Cooper T., Hart K., Baldock D. (2009): The Provision of Public Goods through Agriculture in the European Union. Report to the European Commission. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London.
    12. Dockès A., Tisenkopfs T., Bock B. (2012): Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition. Report for project funded from EU FP6 programme FP6-2005SSA-5A. European Commission, Brussels.
    13. Dostál J., Klír J., Kozlovská L., Kvítek T., Růžek P. (2003): Principles of Good Agricultural Practice Focus ing on Water Protection against Nitrates from Agriculture. Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Prague.
    14. Dvorský J., Jelínek A., Koutná K., Mana V., Semrád Z., Smrček L. (2005): Integrated Handbook with Regard to Principles of Good Agricultural Practice. Ministry of Agriculture, Ekotoxa s.r.o., Opava.
    15. Dwyer J., Baldock D., Beaufoy G., Bennett H., Lowe P., Ward N. (2002): European rural development under the agricultural policy second pillar: Institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies, 41: 873-887. Go to original source...
    16. Dwyer J., Ingram J., Mills J., Taylor J., Blackstock K., Brown K., Burton R., Dilley R., Matthews K., Schwarz G., Slee R.W. (2007): Understanding - Influencing Positive Environmental Behaviour among Farmers and Land Managers - a project for Defra. CCRI, University of Gloucestershire, Brighton.
    17. Elbersen B., Jongeneel R., Kasperczyk N. (2010): CrossCompliance Assessment Tool - Policy Oriented Research FP6 Specific Targeted Research Project. Alterra, Wageningen UR, the Hague.
    18. European Court of Auditors (ECA) (2014): Integration of EU Water Policy Objectives with the CAP: a Partial Success - Special Report No. 4/2014. European Court of Auditors, Luxembourg.
    19. European Environment Agency (2012): Climate Change, Impacts and Vulnerability in Europe 2012 - Report No. 12/2012. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    20. Folke C., Carpenter S., Walker B., Scheffer M., Elmqvist T., Gunderson L., Holling C. (2004): Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35: 557-81. Go to original source...
    21. Gatzweiler F. (2005): Central and Eastern European agriculture and environment: the challenges of governance at multiple levels. Sociologia Ruralis, 45: 139-152. Go to original source...
    22. Geels F. (2011): The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1: 24-40. Go to original source...
    23. Hart K., Baldock D. (2010): Impact of CAP Reforms on the Environmental Performance of Agriculture. Unpublished report to the OECD. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London.
    24. Ingram J., Morris C. (2007): In a transition towards sustainable soil. Land Use Policy, 24: 100-117. Go to original source...
    25. Ingram J. (2008): Farmer-agronomist knowledge encounters. Agriculture and Human Values, 25: 405-418. Go to original source...
    26. Jongeneel R., Brouwer F., Farmer M., Muessner R., de Roest K., Poux X., Fox G., Meister A., Karaczun Z., Winsten J., Ortéga C. (2007): Compliance with Mandatory Standards in Agriculture. A Comparative Approach of the EU vis-à-vis the United States, Canada and New Zealand. Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Wageningen UR, the Hague.
    27. Kabele J. (1998): Přerody (Principy sociálního konstruování). Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press, Prague.
    28. Klír J., Kozlovská L. (2012): Good Agricultural Practice for Water Protection - Certified Methodology for Practice. Research Institute for Plant, Prague.
    29. Lefebvre M., Espinosa M., Gomez y Paloma S. (2012): Agricultural Landscape. European Commission, JRC, Ispra.
    30. Lewis K., Skinner J., Bardon K., Tucker D., Chamber B. (1997): Impact of agriculture in the UK. Environmental Management, 50: 111-128. Go to original source...
    31. Lockie S. (2006): Networks of agri-environmental action: temporality, spatiality and identity in agricultural environments. Sociologia Ruralis, 46: 22-39. Go to original source...
    32. McVittie A., Norton L., Martin-Ortega J., Siametti I., Glenk K., Aalders I. (2015): Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips. Ecological Economics, 110: 15-27. Go to original source...
    33. Mlčoch L. (2005): Institutional Economy. Karolinum: Charles University Prague, Prague.
    34. Mlčoch L. (2016): Economy, Ecology: Human Values and Civilization Problems. Karolinum: Charles University Prague, Prague.
    35. Nitsch H. (2006): Administrative Arrangements for Cross Compliance. FP6 research project. Institute of Rural Studies, Federal Agricultural Research Centre, Braunschweig.
    36. North D. (1981): Structure and Change in Economic History. W.W. Norton & Co., London, New York.
    37. North D. (1990): Institutions, Insitutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    38. Novotný I., Váňová V., Vopravil J., Podhrázská J., Fiala R., Dostál T. (2014): Handbook with Regard to Protection against Water Erosion. Research Institute of Meliorations and Soils, Prague.
    39. OECD (2008): Czech Republic Country Report. OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/czech/40753719.pdf (accessed Jan 2016).
    40. Ostrom E. (2009): A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325: 419-422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    41. Poláková J., Berman S., Naumann S., Frelih-Larsen A., von Toggenburg J., Farmer A. (2013): The Sustainable Management of Natural Resources with a Focus on Water and Agriculture. Report prepared for the STOA Panel of the European Parliament. STOA, Brussels.
    42. Ray C. (1998): Towards a theory of the dialectics of local rural development within the European Union. Sociologia Ruralis, 37: 345 - 364. Go to original source...
    43. Roberts W., Sutter M., Haygarth P. (2012): Phosphorus Retention in Vegetated Buffer Strips: A review. Environmental Quality, 41: 389-399. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Söderberg T. (2011): Environmental Effects of CrossCompliance. Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping.
    45. Stoate C., Boatman N.D., Borralho R.J., Carvalho C.R., de Snoo G.R., Eden P. (2001): Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. Environmental Management, 63: 337-365. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Sutherland L., Darnhofer I. (2012): Of organic farmers and 'good farmers': Changing habitus in rural England. Rural studies, 28: 232-240. Go to original source...
    47. Urban J., Střelec M. (2011): Czechia Searching Future Agriculture and Landscape: Preliminary Study. Glopolis Institute, Prague.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content