Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2019, 46(2):81-89 | DOI: 10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI

Stomatal anatomy and closing ability is affected by supplementary light intensity in rose (Rosa hybrida L.)Original Paper

Dimitrios Fanourakis1, †, Benita Hyldgaard2, †, Habtamu Giday2,3, Isaac Aulik2, Dimitris Bouranis4, Oliver Körner5, Carl-Otto Ottosen*,2
1 Giannakakis SA, Export Fruits and Vegetables, Tympaki, Greece
2 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark
3 Horticulture and Product Physiology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
4 Plant Physiology and Morphology Laboratory, Crop Science Department, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece
5 Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Grossbeeren, Germany

Increasing the light level in protected cultivation of ornamental crops via supplementary lighting is critical to enhance both production and external quality especially during the periods of low light availability. Despite wide applications the effects of light intensities were not previously addressed on water loss pathways. In this study rose plants were cultivated at 100, 200 or 400 μmol/(m2.s) photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). The stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, stomatal anatomical features and cuticular transpiration were determined. Plant biomass as well as photosynthesis response to light and CO2 were also assessed. Increasing growth PPFD led to a considerable increase in plant biomass (85 and 57% for 100 to 200 and 200 to 400 μmol/(m2.s) respectively). Photosynthesis was marginally affected by increasing growth PPFD from 100 to 200 μmol/(m2.s) while a further rise to 400 μmol/(m2.s) considerably increased photosynthetic rate at high light intensities. Higher PPFD during cultivation generally led to larger stomata with bigger pores. A PPFD increase from 100 to 200 μmol/(m2.s) had a small negative effect on stomatal closing ability whereas a further rise to 400 μmol/(m2.s) had a substantial stimulatory effect. Cultivation at a PPFD higher than 100 μmol/(m2.s) led to lower rates of cuticular transpiration. In conclusion, high growth PPFD (> 200 μmol/(m2.s)) enchanced both photosynthetic and stomatal anatomical traits. High light intensity (> 200 μmol/(m2.s)) also led to a better control of water loss due to more responsive stomata and decreased cuticular permeability.

Keywords: cuticular water loss; photosynthesis; stomatal size; transpiration

Published: June 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fanourakis D, Hyldgaard B, Giday H, Aulik I, Bouranis D, Körner O, Ottosen C. Stomatal anatomy and closing ability is affected by supplementary light intensity in rose (Rosa hybrida L.). Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2019;46(2):81-89. doi: 10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file144_2017_hortsci_SOM.pdf

File size: 151.23 kB

References

  1. Blom-Zandstra M., Pot C.S., Maas F.M., Schapendonk, H.C.M. (1995): Effects of different light treatments on the nocturnal transpiration and dynamics of stomatal closure of two rose cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 61: 251-262. Go to original source...
  2. Boyer J.S., Wong S.C., Farquhar G.D. (1997): CO2 and water vapour exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiology, 114: 185-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Carvalho D.R.A., Fanourakis D., Correia M.J., Monteiro J.A., Alves J.P.L., Vasconcelos M.W., Almeida D.P.F., Heuvelink E., Carvalho S.M.P., Araújo A.B.A. (2016): Root-to-shoot signaling does not contribute to genotypic variation in stomatal functioning induced by high relative air humidity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 123: 13-21. Go to original source...
  4. Domínguez E., Heredia-Guerrero J., Heredia A. (2011): The biophysical design of plant cuticles: an overview. New Phytologist, 189: 938-949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Drake P.L., Froend R.H., Franks P.J. (2012): Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64: 495-505. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Fanourakis D., Bouranis D., Giday H., Carvalho D.R.A., Rezaei O., Nejad A., Ottosen C.-O. (2016): Improving stomatal functioning at elevated growth air humidity: a review. Journal of Plant Physiology, 207: 51-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fanourakis D., Carvalho S.M.P., Almeida D.P.F., Van Kooten O., Van Doorn W.G., Heuvelink E. (2012): Postharvest water relations in cut rose cultivars with contrasting sensitivity to high relative air humidity during growth. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 64: 64-73. Go to original source...
  8. Fanourakis D., Heuvelink E., Carvalho S.M.P. (2013a): A comprehensive analysis of the physiological and anatomical components involved in higher water loss rates after leaf development at high humidity. Journal of Plant Physiology, 170: 890-898. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Fanourakis D., Giday H., Milla R., Pieruschka R., Kjaer K.H., Bolger M., Vasilevski A., Nunes-Nesi A., Fiorani F., Ottosen C.-O. (2014): Pore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance between leaf sides. Annals of Botany, 115: 555-565. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Fanourakis D., Heuvelink E.,Carvalho S.M.P. (2015a): Spatial heterogeneity in stomatal features during leaf elongation: an analysis using Rosa hybrida. Functional Plant Biology, 42: 737-745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Fanourakis D., Pieruschka R., Savvides A., Macnish A.J., Sarlikioti V., Woltering E.J. (2013b): Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 78: 1-15. Go to original source...
  12. Fanourakis D., Velez-Ramirez A.I., In: Barendse, B.C., Van Meeteren U., Woltering E.J. (2015b). A survey of preharvest conditions affecting the regulation of water loss during vase life. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 1064: 195-204 Go to original source...
  13. Giday H., Fanourakis D., Kjaer K.H., Fomsgaard I.S., Ottosen C.-O. (2013a): Foliar abscisic acid content underlies genotypic variation in stomatal responsiveness after growth at high relative air humidity. Annals of Botany, 112: 1857-1867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Giday H., Kjaer K.H., Fanourakis D., Ottosen C.-O. (2013b): Smaller stomata require less severe leaf drying to close: a case study in Rosa hybrida. Journal of Plant Physiology, 170: 1309-1316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Heuvelink E., Bakker M.J., Hogendonk L., Jansen J., Kaarsemaker R., Maaswinkel R. (2006): Horticultural lighting in The Netherlands: new developments. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS), 711: 25-34. Go to original source...
  16. James S.A., Bell, D.T. (2000): Influence of light availability on leaf structure and growth of two Eucalyptus globulus ssp globulus provenances. Tree Physiology: 1007-1018. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kerstiens G. (1996): Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47: 1813-1832. Go to original source...
  18. Poorter H., Niinemets U., Walter A., Fiorani F., Schurr U. (2010): A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a metaanalysis of phenotypic data. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61: 2043-2055. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Terashima I., Hanba Y.T., Tazoe Y., Vyas P., Yano, S. (2005): Irradiance and phenotype: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57: 343-354. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Xue D., Zhang X., Lu X., Chen G., Chen Z.H. (2017): Molecular and evolutionary mechanisms of cuticular wax for plant drought tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 621: 8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Yano S., Terashima I. (2004): Developmental process of sun and shade leaves in Chenopidium album L. Plant, Cell and Environment, 27: 781-793. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.