J. For. Sci., 2021, 67(8):367-375 | DOI: 10.17221/150/2020-JFS

Distribution attributes of natural canopy gaps in the Hyrcanian mixed-oriental beech forestsOriginal Paper

Asadollah Mataji1, Ali-Asghar Vahedi*,2
1 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Research Department of Natural Resources, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sari, Iran

One of the most important issues indicating the quality and quantity of forest ecosystems is the distribution of natural disturbances resulting in canopy gaps (CGs). The present study was conducted in one of the Hyrcanian beech forests in northern Iran in summer 2018. The gap areas were classified into small (< 200 m2), medium (200‒500 m2) and large gaps (500-1 000 m2) on the basis of full inventory. The univariate Ripley's L-function was used for introducing the CG spatial pattern. Furthermore, mark correlation function (MCF) and density function (DC) in turns were used for verifying the correlation and frequency of CG size classes in each pattern. The results showed patterns of the gaps in each size class and integrated by the three size classes, they were random and cluster, respectively. Furthermore, the MCF revealed that the gap size classes were independently located in the clusters. The total frequency of the small, medium and large gaps in turns was 32, 49 and 19%, respectively. Although the density share of medium and small gaps in turns was more frequent than the large gap density in the study forest, the results of DC indicated that the frequency of each gap size class was random within each cluster, regardless of their density share. Based on the natural gap aggregations, the base circular mosaic with an area of 5 000 m2 can be introduced for monitoring and specifying the forest stand dynamics.

Keywords: clustered pattern; disturbance; Hyrcanian forest; stand mosaic

Published: August 9, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mataji A, Vahedi A. Distribution attributes of natural canopy gaps in the Hyrcanian mixed-oriental beech forests. J. For. Sci.. 2021;67(8):367-375. doi: 10.17221/150/2020-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Amanzedeh B., Pourmajidian M.R., Sagheb-Talebi K., Hojati S.M. (2015): Impact of canopy gap size on plant species diversity and composition in mixed stands, case study: Reserve area, District No. 3 Asalem Forests. Journal of Forest and Wood Product, 68: 287-301.
  2. Asner G.P., Keller M., Silvas J.N.M. (2004): Spatial and temporal dynamics of forest canopy gaps following selective logging in the eastern Amazon. Global Change Biology, 10: 765-783. Go to original source...
  3. Frelich L.E., Lorimer C.G. (1991): Natural disturbance regimes in hemlock-hardwood forests of the Upper Great Lakes region. Ecological Monographs, 61: 145-164. Go to original source...
  4. Garbarino M., Borgono Mondino E., Lingua E., Nagel T.A., Dukić V., Govedar Z., Motta R. (2012): Gap disturbances and regeneration patterns in a Bosnian old-growth forest: A multispectral remote sensing and ground-based approach. Annals of Forest Science, 69: 617-625. Go to original source...
  5. Karami A., Feghhi J., Marvi Mohajer M.R. (2013): Analysis environmental and ecological spatial state of forest regeneration patches in various types natural Fagetum - orientalis north Iran. (Case study: Gorazbon district, Kheyrod Forest). Journal of Natural Environment, 66: 411-422.
  6. Li Y., He J., Yu S., Zhu D., Wang H., Ye S. (2019): Spatial structure of the vertical layers in a subtropical secondary forest 57 years after clear-cutting. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 12: 442-450. Go to original source...
  7. Mataji A., Babaei-Kafaki S., Safaei H., Kiadaliri H. (2008): Spatial pattern of regeneration gaps in managed and unmanaged stands in natural beech (Fagus orientalis) forests. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 16: 149-157.
  8. Mohammadi L., Mohadjer M.R.M., Etemad V., Sefidi K., Nasiri N. (2019): Natural regeneration within natural and man-made canopy gaps in Caspian natural beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest, Northern Iran. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 39: 61-75. Go to original source...
  9. Muscolo A., Bagnato S., Sidari M., Mercurio R. (2014): A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. Journal of Forestry Research, 25: 725-736. Go to original source...
  10. Nagel T.A., Mikac S., Dolinar M., Klopcic M., Keren S., Svoboda M., Diaci J., Boncina A., Paulic V. (2017): The natural disturbance regime in forests of the Dinaric Mountains: A synthesis of evidence. Forest Ecology and Management, 388: 29-42. Go to original source...
  11. Nasiri N., Mohadjer M.R.M., Etemad V., Sefidi K., Mohammadi L., Gharehaghaji M. (2018): Natural regeneration of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) trees in canopy gaps and under closed canopy in a forest in northern Iran. Journal of Forestry Research, 29: 1075-1081. Go to original source...
  12. Parhizkar P., Amanzadeh B., Hassani M., Sadeghzadeh M.H. (2020): Effect of single tree selection system on some of the canopy gap characteristics within Shafaroud beech forests. Forest Research and Development, 6: 203-218. (in Persian)
  13. Ripley B.D. (1976): The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. Journal of Applied Probability, 13: 255-266. Go to original source...
  14. Schliemann S.A., Bockheim J.G. (2011): Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 1143-1151. Go to original source...
  15. Spies T.A., Franklin J.F., Klopsch M. (1990): Canopy gaps in Douglas-fir forest of the Cascade mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20: 649-658. Go to original source...
  16. Stueve K.M., Perry C.H., Nelson M.D., Healey S.P., Hill A.D., Moisen G.G., Cohen W.B., Gormanson D.D., Huang C. (2011): Ecological importance of intermediate windstorms rivals large, infrequent disturbances in the northern Great Lakes. Ecosphere, 2: 1-21. Go to original source...
  17. Wälder K., Wälder O. (2008): Analysing interaction effects in forests using the mark correlation function. iForests - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 1: 34-38. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.