Vet Med - Czech, 2010, 55(2):71-78 | DOI: 10.17221/152/2009-VETMED

In vitro effects of essential oils on potential pathogens and beneficial members of the normal microbiota

A.C. Ouwehand1, K. Tiihonen1, H. Kettunen1, S. Peuranen1, H. Schulze2, N. Rautonen1
1 Danisco Finland, Kantvik, Finland
2 Danisco Animal Nutrition, Leiden, The Netherlands

The use of antimicrobial growth promoters has been banned in the EU. This has created an interest in alternative strategies to prevent an imbalance in the intestinal microbiota and the potential development of intestinal disorders in livestock. Essential oils (EOs) have been known to exhibit antimicrobial activity against specific microbial species and could therefore be considered one such alternative in controlling the intestinal microbial population. Under anaerobic conditions, the tested Clostridium perfringens strains were found to be sensitive (P < 0.05) to carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, citral, limonene, thymol, particularly at the higher concentration tested (500 mg/l) and to oregano oil, rosemary oil and thyme oil. Streptococcus epidermis was sensitive (P < 0.05) to most EO's tested, also mainly at the higher concentration. The tested Salmonella serovars were found to be sensitive (P < 0.05) only to high (500 mg/l) concentrations of the tested EOs. Escherichia coli was sensitive (P < 0.05) to most of the tested EOs, also at lower concentrations (5 and 50 mg/l). Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus reuteri were less sensitive (P < 0.05) to most of the tested EOs, while Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis and L. fermentum were relatively sensitive also at lower concentrations (5 and 50 mg/l), although growth reduction by EOs of these bacterial species was less then with the antimicrobial growth promoter avilamycin. With the exception of Salmonella and E. coli, all tested microbes were sensitive to avilamycin. Selected EOs seem to have the advantage of inhibiting the growth of potential pathogens while only moderately influencing beneficial members of the intestinal microbiota. This difference in sensitivity may strengthen the microbiota and contribute to improved animal health.

Keywords: antimicrobial; Bifidobacterium; Lactobacillus; Clostridium perfringens; Escherichia coli; Salmonella

Published: February 28, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ouwehand AC, Tiihonen K, Kettunen H, Peuranen S, Schulze H, Rautonen N. In vitro effects of essential oils on potential pathogens and beneficial members of the normal microbiota. Vet Med-Czech. 2010;55(2):71-78. doi: 10.17221/152/2009-VETMED.
Download citation

References

  1. Adlerberth I, Cerquetti M, Poilane I, Wold A, Collignon A (2000): Mechanisms of colonisation and colonisation resistance of the digestive tract. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 11, 223-239. Go to original source...
  2. Burt S (2004): Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods - a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 94, 223- 253. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Butaye P, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F (2003): Antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed: effects of less well known antibiotics on gram-positive bacteria. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 16, 175-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chorianopoulos N, Kalpoutzakis E, Aligiannis N, Mitaku S, Nychas G-J, Haroutounian SA (2004): Essential oils of Satureja, Origanum and Thymus species: chemical composition and antibacterial activities against foodborne pathogens. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 8261-8267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cross DE, McDevitt RM, Hillman K, Acamovic T (2007): The effect of herbs and their associated essential oils on performance, dietary digestibility and gut microflora in chickens from 7 to 28 days of age. British Poultry Science, 48, 496-506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Di Pasqua R, Betts G, Hoskins N, Edwards M, Ercolini D, Mauriello G (2007): Membrane toxicity of antimicrobial compounds from essential oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 4863-4870. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hamer DH, Gill CJ (2002): From the farm to the kitchen table: The negative impact of antimicrobial use in animals on humans. Nutrition Reviews, 60, 261-264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999a): Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 86, 985-990. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999b): In vitro susceptibilities of lactobacilli and organisms associated with bacterial vaginosis to Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 43, 196. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kalemba D, Kunicka A (2003): Antibacterial and antifungal properties of essential oils. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 10, 813-829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Mitsch P, Zittlerl-Eglseer K, Koehler B, Gabler C, Losa R, Zimernik I (2004): The effect of two different blends of essential oil components on the proliferation of Clostridium perfringens in the intestines of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 83, 669-675. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Nousiainen J, Javanainen P, Setala J, von Wright A (2004): Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In: Salminen S, von Wright A, Ouwehand A (eds.): Lactic Acid Bacteria: Microbiological and Functional Aspects. 3rd ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. 547-580. Go to original source...
  13. Si W, Gong J, Tsao R, Zhou T, Yu H, Poppe C, Johnson R, Du Z (2006): Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and structurally related synthetic food additives towards selected pathogenic and beneficial gut bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 100, 296-305. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Wegener HC (2003): Ending the use of antimicrobial growth promoters is making a difference. ASM News, 69, 443-448.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.