Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2019, 65(4):194-202 | DOI: 10.17221/172/2018-AGRICECON

Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheatOriginal Paper

Teresina Mancuso, Tibor Verduna, Simone Blanc*, Giuseppe Di Vita, Filippo Brun
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Grugliasco, Italy

Common wheat, a fundamental commodity on international markets, is increasingly differentiated into commercial types on domestic markets to meet the demand of processing companies. Improver wheat, biscuit wheat, ordinary and superior bread-making wheat are commercial varieties with specific technological characteristics. Wheat farming systems are constantly evolving, and as a result, related environmental issues emerge. We applied an LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) analysis, where the functional unit was 1 tonne of grain for each typology and system boundaries were from cradle to farm gate. Primary data were used in the study, and special attention was paid to fertiliser use. From an LCA perspective, our findings show that nitrogen (N) plays an essential role in plant production although producing different waterborne and airborne emissions and nitrate leaching, for the 4 commercial typologies studied. Furthermore, the impact can be differentiated based on the technological features of the commercial types. Our results led us to observe that the four wheat types show contrasting economic and environmental performances.

Keywords: common wheat; grains; Life Cycle Assessment; sustainability

Published: April 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mancuso T, Verduna T, Blanc S, Di Vita G, Brun F. Environmental sustainability and economic matters of commercial types of common wheat. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2019;65(4):194-202. doi: 10.17221/172/2018-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Achten W.M.J., Van Acker K. (2016): EU-average impacts of wheat production: A meta-analysis of Life Cycle Assessments. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20: 132-144. Go to original source...
    2. Baudino C., Giuggioli N.R., Briano R., Massaglia S., Peano C. (2017): Integrated methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for improving production chains and environmental sustainability of kiwifruit and baby kiwi in Italy. Sustainability, 9. Go to original source...
    3. Blanc S., Accastello C., Girgenti V., Brun F., Mosso A. (2018): Innovative strategies for the raspberry supply chain: an environmental and economic assessment. Quality - Access to Success, 19: 139-142.
    4. Blandino M., Reyneri A. (2009): Effect of fungicide and foliar fertilizer application to winter wheat at anthesis on flag leaf senescence, grain yield, flour bread-making quality and DON contamination. European Journal of Agronomy, 30: 275-282. Go to original source...
    5. Blandino M., Vaccino P., Reyneri A. (2015): Late-season nitrogen increases improver common and durum wheat quality. Agronomy Journal, 107: 680-690. Go to original source...
    6. Brentrup F., Kusters J., Lammel J., Kuhlmann H. (2000): Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA. Studies in the agricultural sector. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5: 349-357. Go to original source...
    7. Charles R., Jolliet O., Gaillard G., Pellet D. (2006): Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 113: 216-225. Go to original source...
    8. Chiriaco M.V., Grossi G., Castaldi S., Valentini R. (2017): The contribution to climate change of the organic versus conventional wheat farming: A case study on the carbon footprint of wholemeal bread production in Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153: 309-319. Go to original source...
    9. CME Group (2018): CME Group database. Available at http://www.cmegroup.com
    10. Di Vita G., D'Amico M., Lombardi A., Pecorino B. (2016): Evaluating trends of low sodium content in food: The willingness to pay for salt-reduced bread, a case study. Agricultural Economics Review, 17: 82.
    11. European Commission (2017): Cereals market situation. Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/cereals/index_en.htm
    12. European Commission (2018): Agriculture and Rural Development, EU Crops Market Observatory Cereals. European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/market-observatory/crops/cereals/statistics_en
    13. Eurostat (2018): Eurostat database. Eurostat. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
    14. Foca G., Ulrici A., Corbellini M., Pagani M.A., Lucisano M., Franchini G.C., Tassi L. (2007): Reproducibility of the Italian ISQ method for quality classification of bread wheats: An evaluation by expert assessors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 87: 839-846. Go to original source...
    15. Granary Association of Milan (2018): Granary Association of Milan database. Granary Association of Milan. Available at http://www.granariamilano.org/
    16. Hischier R. (2007): Life Cycle Inventories of Packagings and Graphical Papers. Final report. Ecoinvent Data V2.0, No. 11.
    17. International Grain Council (2018): International grain council database. International Grain Council. Available at https://www.igc.int/
    18. Johansson E., Prieto-Linde M.L., Jonsson J.O. (2001): Effects of wheat cultivar and nitrogen application on storage protein composition and breadmaking quality. Cereal Chemistry, 78: 19-25. Go to original source...
    19. Kubankova M., Hajek M., Votavova A. (2016): Environmental and social value of agriculture innovation. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 62: 101-112. Go to original source...
    20. Laratte B., Guillaume B., Kim J., Birregah B. (2014): Modeling cumulative effects in life cycle assessment: The case of fertilizer in wheat production contributing to the global warming potential. Science of the Total Environment, 481: 588-595. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Morari F., Zanella V., Sartori L., Visioli G., Berzaghi P., Mosca G. (2018): Optimising durum wheat cultivation in North Italy: understanding the effects of site-specific fertilization on yield and protein content. Precision Agriculture, 19: 257-277. Go to original source...
    22. Nti F.K., Barkley A. (2017): Wheat variety yield data: Do commercial and public performance tests provide the same information? Agricultural Economics, 48: 279-289. Go to original source...
    23. PRé Consultants (2013): Simapro 8. In: Stationsplein 121. Amersfoort, Netherlands.
    24. Samaras Z., Winther M., Zierock K.-H., Lambrecht U. (2009): Non-road mobile sources and machinery. In: Emep/eea, 2009: Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook. European Environment Agency. Available at http://www.forskningsdatabasen.dk/en/catalog/2389286647
    25. Schau E.M., Fet A.M. (2008): LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13: 255-264. Go to original source...
    26. Sierra-Pérez J., García-Pérez S., Blanc S., Boschmonart-Rives J., Gabarrell X. (2018): The use of forest-based materials for the efficient energy of cities: Environmental and economic implications of cork as insulation material. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37: 628-636. Go to original source...
    27. UN-COMTRADE (2018): International Trade Statistics Database. UN-COMTRADE. Available at https://comtrade. un.org/
    28. Visioli G., Bonas U., Dal Cortivo C., Pasini G., Marmiroli N., Mosca G., Vamerali T. (2018): Variations in yield and gluten proteins in durum wheat varieties under late-season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer in a northern Mediterranean environment. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98: 2360-2369. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Wang W.J., Dalal R.C., Reeves S.H., Butterbach-Bahl K., Kiese R. (2011): Greenhouse gas fluxes from an Australian subtropical cropland under long-term contrasting management regimes. Global Change Biology, 17: 3089-3101. Go to original source...
    30. Zerulla W., Barth T., Dressel J., Erhardt K., von Locquenghien K.H., Pasda G., Rädle M., Wissemeier A.H. (2001): 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) - a new nitrification inhibitor for agriculture and horticulture - An introduction. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34: 79-84. Go to original source...
    31. Ziegelbaeck M., Breuer G. (2014): The role of market makers in the Euronext milling wheat contract. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 60: 183-187. Go to original source...
    32. Ziolkowska J., Jechlitschka K., Kirschke D. (2009): Global implications of national price policies on the wheat market - quantitative assessment of world market effects. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55: 475-480. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content