Czech J. Food Sci., 2020, 38(3):144-150 | DOI: 10.17221/193/2018-CJFS

The effect of yeast generations on fermentation, maturation and volatile compounds of beerOriginal Paper

Krzysztof Kucharczyk*,1, Tadeusz Tuszyński1, Krzysztof Żyła2, Czesław Puchalski3
1 Cracow School of Health Promotion, Cracow, Poland
2 Department of Food Biotechnology, Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Cracow, Poland
3 Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of yeast generations on fermentation and maturation processes, the content of volatile compounds of beer and viability and vitality of yeast biomass on an industrial scale. The experiments with fermentation and maturation were performed in fermentation tanks. The wort was aerated with sterile air. Yeast (S. pastorianus) bottom fermentation was used in fermentation. For pitching four generations (passages) of yeast were used as follows: 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation. The processes of fermentation and maturation were carried out in the same technological conditions (temperature and pressure). During fermentation and maturation, the changes in the content of the extract, yeast growth and vitality and selected volatile compounds like esters, alcohols and carbonyl compounds were investigated. With the increase in the number of yeast generations, especially from the 2nd generation used in the fermentation process, the content of acetaldehyde and esters increased. Despite the slight differences between generations, the changes are statistically significant. The content of diacetyl is stable for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd generation and higher for the 4th generation. Diversified yeast generations used in the process of fermentation did not affect significantly the final quality of beer.

Keywords: wort; yeast generation; fermentation; volatile compounds; beer

Published: June 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kucharczyk K, Tuszyński T, Żyła K, Puchalski C. The effect of yeast generations on fermentation, maturation and volatile compounds of beer. Czech J. Food Sci.. 2020;38(3):144-150. doi: 10.17221/193/2018-CJFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Axcell B., O'Connor-Cox E. (1996): The concept of yeast vitality - an alternative approach. In: Proceedings 24th Convention of the Institute of Brewing, Asia Pacific Section. Institute of Brewing, Singapore, Indonesia: 64-71.
  2. Jenkins C., Kennedy A., Hudgson J., Thurston P., Smart K. (2003): Impact of serial repitching on lager brewing yeast quality. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 61: 1-9. Go to original source...
  3. Jin Y.L., Speers R.A. (2000): Effect of environmental conditions on the flocculation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 58: 108-116. Go to original source...
  4. Kordialik-Bogacka E., Diowksz A. (2013): Physiological state of reused brewing yeast. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 31: 264-269. Go to original source...
  5. Kucharczyk K., Tuszyński T. (2018): The effect of temperature on fermentation and beer volatiles at industrial scale. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 124: 230-235. Go to original source...
  6. Lodolo E., Kocks J., Axcell B., Brooks M. (2008): The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the main character in beer brewing. FEMS Yeast Research, 8: 1018-1036. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Miller K., Box W., Boulton Ch., Smart K. (2012): Cell cycle synchrony of propagated and recycled lager yeast and its impact on lag phase in fermenter. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 70: 1-9. Go to original source...
  8. Müller A.G., Manger HJ., Lietz P. (2005): The yeast in the brewery. Management pure yeast cultures propagation. VLB Berlin, Germany: 135-137. (In German)
  9. Powell Ch., Diacetis A. (2007): Long term serial repitching and the genetic and phenotypic stability of brewer's yeast. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 113: 67-74. Go to original source...
  10. Powell Ch., Quain D., Smart K. (2003): The impact of brewing yeast cell age on fermentation performance, attenuation and flocculation. FEMS Yeast Research, 3: 149-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Sigler K., Matoulkova D., Dienstbier M., Gabriel P. (2009): Net effect of wort osmotic pressure on fermentation course, yeast vitality, beer flavor, and haze. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 82: 1027-1035. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Stewart G. (2015): Seduced by yeast. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 73: 1-21. Go to original source...
  13. Stingheriu R. (2005): Preservation method of yeast and performance in beer fermentation. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, 2: 337-344.
  14. Verbelen P., Tinne E., Dekoninck E., Van Mulders S., Delvaux F., Delvaux F. (2009): Stability of high cell density brewery fermentations during serial repitching. Biotechnology Letters, 31: 1729-1737. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Verstrepen K., Derdelinckx G., Verachtert H., Delvaux F. (2003): Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 61: 197-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Vidgren V., Londesborough J. (2011): 125th anniversary review: Yeast flocculation and sedimentation in brewing. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 117: 475-487. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.