Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2010, 55(5):200-208 | DOI: 10.17221/263/2009-CJAS

Association analysis of PPARGC1A mutations with meat quality parameters in a commercial hybrid pig population

T. Erkens1, S. De Smet2, K. Van den Maagdenberg2, A. Stinckens3, N. Buys3, A. Van Zeveren1, L.J. Peelman1
1 Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
2 Department of Animal Production, Laboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Melle, Belgium
3 Department of Biosystems, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, K.U. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PPARGC1A) is a promising candidate gene for selection on meat and carcass quality traits in the pig industry. In the pig, several SNPs have been reported in both coding and regulatory regions of this gene, some of which were associated with fat characteristics, but none of these associations have been confirmed and many SNPs have not yet been evaluated. Therefore, 18 PPARGC1A SNPs were genotyped in 65 slaughter pigs of a commercial hybrid population and used in an association analysis with multiple muscle and carcass traits. Several SNPs located in the 3'UTR and exon 8 and 9 of PPARGC1A were significantly (P < 0.05-0.001) associated with various carcass composition, tenderness and muscle fibre traits. They could potentially serve as DNA selection markers, if their impact was to be confirmed by a functional analysis.

Keywords: association analysis; carcass composition; meat quality; pig; PPARGC1A; SNP

Published: May 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Erkens T, De Smet S, Van den Maagdenberg K, Stinckens A, Buys N, Van Zeveren A, Peelman LJ. Association analysis of PPARGC1A mutations with meat quality parameters in a commercial hybrid pig population. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2010;55(5):200-208. doi: 10.17221/263/2009-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Cameron N.D. (1990): Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass traits, meat and eating quality traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science, 26, 119-135. Go to original source...
  2. Davoli R., Braglia S. (2007): Molecular approaches in pig breeding to improve meat quality. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics, 6, 313-321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. De Smet S.M., Pauwels H., De Bie S., Demeyer D.I., Callewier J., Eeckhout W. (1996): Effect of halothane genotype, breed, feed withdrawal, and lairage on pork quality of belgian slaughter pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 1854-1863. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dulloo A.G., Samec S. (2001): Uncoupling proteins: their roles in adaptive thermogenesis and substrate metabolism reconsidered. The British Journal of Nutrition, 86, 123-139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Ek J., Andersen G., Urhammer S.A., Gćde P.H., Drivshom T., Borch-Johnsen K., Hansen T., Pedersen O. (2001): Mutation analysis of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ coactivator-1 (PGC-1) and relationships of identified amino acid polymorphisms to type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia, 44, 2220-2226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Erkens T., Van Poucke M., Vandesompele J., Goossens K., Van Zeveren A., Peelman L.J. (2006): Development of a new set of reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR data of porcine backfat and longissimus dorsi muscle, and evaluation with PPARGC1A. BMC Biotechnology, 6, 41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Erkens T., Rohrer G.A., Van Zeveren A., Peelman L.J. (2009): SNP detection in the porcine PPARGC1A promoter region and 3'UTR, and an association study in a Landrace-Duroc-Large White population. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 408-416. Go to original source...
  8. Fujii J., Otsu K., Zorzato F., de Leon S., Khanna V.K., Weiler J.E., O'Brien P.J., MacLennan D.H. (1991): Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science, 253, 448-451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Handschin C., Spiegelman B.M. (2006): Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1 coactivators, energy homeostasis, and metabolism. Endocrine Reviews, 27, 728-735. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Jacobs K., Rohrer G., Van Poucke M., Piumi F., Yerle M., Barthenschlager H., Mattheeuws M., Van Zeveren A., Peelman L.J. (2006): Porcine PPARGC1A (peroxisome proliferative activated receptor gamma coactivator 1A): coding sequence, genomic organization, polymorphisms and mapping. Cytogenetic and Genome Research, 112, 106-113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Knutti D., Kaul A., Kralli A. (2000): A tissue specific coactivator of steroid receptors, identified in a functional genetic screen. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 20, 2411-2422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Lin J., Wu H., Tarr P.T., Zhang C.Y., Wu Z., Boss O., Michael L.F., Puigserver P., Isotani E., Olson E.N., Lowell B.B., Bassel-Duby R., Spiegelman B.M. (2002): Transcriptional co-activator PGC-1α drives the formation of slow-twitch muscle fibres. Nature, 418, 797-801. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Medina-Gomez G., Gray S., Vidal-Puig A. (2007): Adipogenesis and lipotoxicity: role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPAR&gamma) and PPARγ coactivator-1 (PGC1). Public Health Nutrition, 10, 1132-1137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Puigserver P., Wu Z., Park C.W., Graves R., Wright M., Spiegelman B.M. (1998): A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell, 92, 829-839. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Rohrer G.A., Keele J.W. (1998): Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting carcass composition in swine: I. Fat deposition traits. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 2247-2254. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Stachowiak M., Szydlowski M., Cieslak J., Switonski M. (2007): SNPs in the Porcine PPARGC1a Gene: Interbreed Differences and Their Phenotypic Effects. Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, 12, 231-239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Van den Maagdenberg K., Stinckens A., Claeys E., Buys N., De Smet S. (2008a): Effect of insulin-like growth factor-II and RYR1 genotype in pigs on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Science, 80, 293-303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Van den Maagdenberg K., Stinckens A., Lefaucheur L., Buys N., De Smet S. (2008b): The effect of mutations in the insulin-like growth factor-II and ryanodine receptor-1 genes on biochemical and histochemical muscle fibre characteristics in pigs. Meat Science, 79, 757-766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Van Laere A.S., Nguyen M., Braunschweig M., Nezer C., Collette C., Moreau L., Archibald A.L., Haley C.S., Buys N., Tally M., Andersson G., Georges M., Andersson L. (2003): A regulatory mutation in IGF2 causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pig. Nature, 425, 832-836. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Vimaleswaran K.S., Radha V., Anjana M., Deepa R., Ghosh S., Majumder P.P., Rao M.R., Mohan V. (2006): Effect of polymorphisms in the PPARGC1A gene on body fat in Asian Indians. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 884-891. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Weikard R., Kühn C., Goldammer T., Freyer G., Schwerin M. (2005): The bovine PPARGC1A gene: molecular characterization and association of an SNP with variation of milk fat synthesis. Physiological Genomics, 21, 1-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Wu Z., Puigserver P., Andersson U., Zhang C., Adelmant G., Mootha V., Troy A., Cinti S., Lowell B., Scarpulla R.C., Spiegelman B.M. (1999): Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1. Cell, 98, 115-124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.