Vet Med - Czech, 2011, 56(3):101-109 | DOI: 10.17221/3159-VETMED

Prevalence and risk factors of claw lesions and lameness in pregnant sows in two types of group housing

L. Pluym1, A. Van Nuffel2, J. Dewulf1, A. Cools1, F. Vangroenweghe3, S. Van Hoorebeke1, D. Maes1
1 Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
2 Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Merelbeke, Belgium
3 Dierengezondheidszorg Vlaanderen vzw, Torhout, Belgium

Claw lesions and lameness in sows are an important welfare concern as well as a cause of considerable economic loss. These problems are more common in group housing than in individual housing systems. Given that group housing for gestating sows will become mandatory in the EU from 2013 onwards, the aim of the present study was: (1) to determine the prevalence of lameness and claw lesions in sows housed in groups during gestation, and (2) to analyze whether the type of group housing system and sow-related factors were associated with lameness and claw lesions. Eight Belgian pig herds with group housing of gestating sows were selected. Four herds used pens with electronic sow feeders (dynamic groups), the other four herds kept their sows in free access stalls (static groups). All sows were visually examined for lameness at the end of gestation. Claw lesions were scored after parturition. Information about feed, housing conditions and culling (strategy) was collected, as well as information about parity and breed. Of all 421 assessed sows, on average 9.7% (min. 2.4%, max. 23.1%) were lame. Almost 99% of the sows had one or more claw lesion with overgrowth of heel horn (93%) and cracks in the wall (52%) as the most prevalent lesions. Neither for lameness nor claw lesions was significant differences found between the two types of group housing. Lameness decreased while the mean claw lesion score increased with ageing. These results suggest that lameness can be caused by reasons other than claw lesions, especially in older sows. Although no difference was found between the two types of group housing, a huge variation between herds was observed. Moreover, as the prevalence of lameness and claw lesions in group housing is quite high and group housing will become mandatory in 2013, further investigation on risk factors of locomotor disorders in sows is necessary.

Keywords: claw health; group housing; locomotor disorders; sows

Published: March 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pluym L, Van Nuffel A, Dewulf J, Cools A, Vangroenweghe F, Van Hoorebeke S, Maes D. Prevalence and risk factors of claw lesions and lameness in pregnant sows in two types of group housing. Vet Med-Czech. 2011;56(3):101-109. doi: 10.17221/3159-VETMED.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anil L, Bhend KMG, Baidoo SK, Morrison R, Deen J (2003): Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls versus group pens with electronic sow feeders. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 223, 1334-1338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Anil SS, Anil L, Deen J (2005): Evaluation of patterns of removal and associations among culling because of lameness and sow productivity traits in swine breeding herds. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226, 956-961. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Anil SS, Anil L, Deen J, Baidoo SK, Walker RD (2007): Factors associated with claw lesions in gestating sows. Journal of Swine Health and Production 15, 78-83.
    4. D'Allaire S, Stein TE, Leman AD (1987): Culling patterns in selected Minnesota swine breeding herds. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 51, 506-512.
    5. Dewey CE, Friendship RM, Wilson MR (1993): Clinical and postmortem examination of sows culled for lameness. Canadian Veterinary Journal 34, 555-556.
    6. Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Dalin A-M, Andersson K (2007): Sow removal in Swedish commercial herds. Livestock Science 106, 76-86. Go to original source...
    7. Geverink N, Tuyttens F, Geenen H, Geers R (eds.) (2009): Group housing of sows: consequences for welfare, health status and environment (in Dutch). FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu, Belgium. 171 pp.
    8. Geyer H (1979): Morphology an growth of the pig claw. Principles for selection of stable flooring and claw pathology (in German). [Dissertation.] University of Zurich; 111 pp.
    9. Gjein H, Larssen RB (1995a): Housing of pregnant sows in loose and confined systems - a field study. 2. Claw lesions: morphology, prevalence, location and relation to age. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36, 433-442. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Gjein H, Larssen RB (1995b): Housing of pregnant sows in loose and confined systems - a field study. 3. The impact of housing factors on claw lesions. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36, 443-450. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Gjein H, Larssen RB (1995c): The effect of claw lesions and claw infections on lameness in loose housing of pregnant sows. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36, 451-459. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Heinonen M, Oravainen J, Tast A, Peltoniemi OAT (2002): Lameness and fertility in sows and gilts - a pilot study. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 37, 236.
    13. Heinonen M, Oravainen J, Orro T, Seppa-Lassila L, AlaKurikka E, Virolainen J, Tast A, Peltoniemi OAT (2006): Lameness and fertility of sows and gilts in randomly selected loose-housed herds in Finland. Veterinary Record 159, 383-387. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Holmgren N, Eliasson-Selling L, Lundeheim N (2000): Claw and leg injuries in group-housed dry sows. In: Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the International Pig Veterinary Society, Melbourne, Australia, 352.
    15. Hoofs AIJ (2006): "The eugenklauwencheck" (in Dutch). Wageningen UR, The Netherlands. http://www.verantwoordeveehouderij.nl/klauwencheck
    16. Jensen TB, Baadsgaard NP, Houe H, Toft N, Ostergaard S (2007): The effect of lameness treatments and treatments for other health disorders on the weight gain and feed conversion in boars at a Danish test station. Livestock Science 112, 34-42. Go to original source...
    17. Johansen M, Alban L, Kjaersgard HD, Baekbo P (2004): Factors associated with suckling piglet average daily gain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 63, 91-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Jorgenson B (2000): Osteochondrosis/Osteoarthrosis and claw disorders in sows, associated with leg weakness. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 41, 123-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Kirk RK, Svensmark B, Ellegaard LP, Jensen HE (2005): Locomotive disorders associated with sow mortality in Danish pig herds. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 52, 423-428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Kroneman A, Vellenga L, Vermeer HM, van der Wilt FJ (1992): Claw health in pigs (in Dutch). Research Institute for Pig Husbandry. Report P 1.78. Wageningen UR. 32 pp.
    21. Kroneman A, Vellenga L, van der Wilt FJ, Vermeer HM (1993a): Field research on veterinary problems in grouphoused sows - a survey of lameness. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A 40, 704-712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Kroneman A, Vellenga L, van der Wilt FJ, Vermeer HM (1993b): Review of health problems in group-housed sows, with special emphasis on lameness. Veterinary Quarterly 15, 26-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Lamers J (2006): "The Zeugenklauwen-check" brings problems into perspective (in Dutch). Varkens 34-36.
    24. Lynch PB, Boyle L, Leonard F, Terngy A, Brophy P (2000): Studies on housing of pregnant sows in groups and individually. Teagasc, Dublin, Report Project No. 4563, 24 pp. http://www.teagasc.ie/research/reports/pigs/4563/eopr-4563.pdf
    25. NRC (1998): Minerals and Vitamins. In: Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Committee on Animal Nutrition, Subcommittee on Swine Nutrition, NW, Washington, D.C. p.47-90.
    26. Penny RHC (1980): Locomotor dysfunction causing reproductive failure. In: Morrow DA (ed.): Current Therapy in Theriogenology. 1st ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. 1042-1045.
    27. Ritter LA, Xue J, Dial GD, Morrison RB, Marsh WE (1999): Prevalence of lesions and body condition scores among female swine at slaughter. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 214, 525-528. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    28. Simmins PH, Brooks PH (1983): Supplementary biotin for sows: effect on reproductive characteristics. Veterinary Record 112, 425. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    29. Simmins PH, Brooks PH (1988): Supplementary biotin for sows: effect on claw integrity. Veterinary Record 122, 431-435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Thiex N (2002): Committee on feeds, fertilizers, and related agricultural topics. Feeds. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 85, 270-273. Go to original source...
    31. Tubbs RC (1988): Lameness in sows: solving a preventable problem. Veterinary Medicine 83, 610-616.
    32. Tuyttens FAM, Struelens E, Van Gansbeke S, Ampe B (2007): Factors influencing farmers' responses to welfare legislation: A case study of gestation sow housing in Flanders (Belgium). Livestock Science 116, 289-299. Go to original source...
    33. Webb NG (1984): Compressive stresses on, and the strength of, the inner and outer digits of pigs feet and the implications for injury and floor design. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Resource 30, 71-80. Go to original source...
    34. Welfare Quality® (2009): Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Pigs (sows and piglets, growing and finishing pigs). Welfare Quality Consortium, Lelystad, The Netherlands. 122 pp.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content