Agric. Econ. - Czech, 2020, 66(11):489-498 | DOI: 10.17221/343/2020-AGRICECON

Circular economy and corporate social responsibility in the agricultural system: Cases study of the Italian agri-food industryOriginal Paper

Simona Fortunati1, Donato Morea ORCID...*,2, Enrico Maria Mosconi1
1 Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
2 Faculty of Economics, Universitas Mercatorum, Rome, Italy

The persistent exploitation of natural resources and the consequent use of consumption are driving global food demand with the result that agricultural activity is becoming less and less environmentally friendly. The circular economy (CE) can become a valid alternative, inserting the economic-agricultural system into the harmonic process of material circulation. The corporate social responsibility (CSR) model is particularly interesting not only because of the ethical dimension of the company but also as a factor of strategic business improvement that combines the concepts of CSR and CE as possible solutions for developing sustainable business processes. The objective of the work is to highlight a detailed framework of how the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the Italian agri-food industry can provide an adequate level of communication, circular strategies and social responsibility practices. The research methodology is based on a qualitative multiple study conducted on a sample of nine companies in the Italian territory. The study highlights the attention of companies on the issues of the CE for the achievement of the set sustainable objectives and the attention to CSR and CE practices. The work has several implications. It provides a further understanding of CSR and CE policies as enabling factors for the development of sustainable organizational performance in agriculture. Moreover, it better investigates the relationship between CSR and the CE. Finally, it analyses the SMEs state of the art in the CE field and strengthens the concept of CE by analysing corporate practices consistent with sustainability reports.

Keywords: business models; eco-compatible agriculture; food; sustainability; value creation

Published: November 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fortunati S, Morea D, Mosconi EM. Circular economy and corporate social responsibility in the agricultural system: Cases study of the Italian agri-food industry. Agric. Econ. - Czech. 2020;66(11):489-498. doi: 10.17221/343/2020-AGRICECON.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AIDA Bureau Van Dijk (2020): Italian Company Data. Available at https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/our-products/data/national/aida (accessed Oct 6, 2020).
    2. Barrena-Martínez J., López-Fernández M., Márquez-Moreno C., Romero-Fernández P.M. (2015): Corporate social responsibility in the process of attracting college graduates. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22: 408-423. Go to original source...
    3. Birim B. (2016): Evaluation of corporate social responsibility and social media as key source of strategic communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235: 70-75. Go to original source...
    4. Brock C., Geier U., Greiner R., Olbrich-Majer M., Fritz J. (2019): Research in biodynamic food and farming - A review. Open Agriculture, 4: 743-757. Go to original source...
    5. Cole S.A., Xiong W. (2017): Agricultural insurance and economic development. Annual Review of Economics, 9: 235-262. Go to original source...
    6. Cutcliffe J.R. (2000): Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31: 1476-1484. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. D'Amato D., Droste N., Allen B., Kettunen M., Lähtinen K., Korhonen J., Toppinen A. (2017): Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168: 716-734. Go to original source...
    8. Deschenes O. (2015): Green jobs. In: Wright J.D. (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier; Burlington, Elsevier Science: 372-378. Go to original source...
    9. Ellen-MacArthur Foundation (2013): Toward the circular economy - Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen-MacArthur Foundation: 1-98. Available at https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf (accessed Oct 6, 2020).
    10. Engelken M., Römer B., Drescher M., Welpe I.M., Picot A. (2016): Comparing drivers, barriers, and opportunities of business models for renewable energies: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60: 795-809. Go to original source...
    11. Esken B., Franco-García M.L., Fisscher, O.A.M. (2018): CSR perception as a signpost for circular economy. Management Research Review, 41: 586-604. Go to original source...
    12. FAO (2016): The FAO Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance 2016-2020. FAO: 1-25. Available at http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5996e.pdf (accessed Oct 6, 2020).
    13. Fortunati S., Martiniello L., Morea D. (2020): The strategic role of the corporate social responsibility and circular economy in the cosmetic industry. Sustainability, 12: 5120. Go to original source...
    14. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P., Hultink E.J. (2017): The circular economy - A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143: 757-768. Go to original source...
    15. Lai C.S., Chiu C.J., Yang C.F., Pai D.C. (2010): The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 457-469. Go to original source...
    16. Leandro A., Paixao S. (2018): Corporate social responsibility and circular economy: Two ways, same destinations? An outlook on both concepts and cases from Portugal. In: Proceedings Congrès avniR, Portugal, Nov 7, 2018: 24.
    17. Lee S. (2020): Role of social and solidarity economy in localizing the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 1: 65-71. Go to original source...
    18. Mie A., Andersen H.R., Gunnarsson S., Kahl J., KesseGuyot E., Rembiałkowska E., Quaglio G., Grandjean P. (2017): Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture: A comprehensive review. Environmental Health, 16: 111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Morel K., Léger F., Ferguson R.S. (2018): Permaculture. In: Fath B.D. (ed.): Encyclopedia of Ecology. 2nd Ed. Amsterdam, Elsevier: 559-567. Go to original source...
    20. Muller A., Schader C., El-Hage Scialabba N., Brüggemann J., Isensee A., Erb K.H., Smith P., Klocke P., Leiber F., Stolze M., Niggli U. (2017): Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nature Communications, 8: 1290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Murray A., Skene K., Haynes K. (2017): The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140: 369-380. Go to original source...
    22. Odum H.T., Odum E.C., Brown M.T. (2018): Agricultural systems. In: Odum H.T. (ed.): Environment and Society in Florida. New York, United States, Routledge: 1-10. Go to original source...
    23. Passeri R., Mazzi C. (2013): Ethics in the company and business (Etica nell'impresa e negli affari). Milan, Italy, Franco Angeli: 1-184. (in Italian)
    24. Pieroni M.P.P., McAloone T.C., Pigosso D.C.A. (2019): Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215: 198-216. Go to original source...
    25. Rahdari A., Sepasi S., Moradi M. (2016): Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 347-360. Go to original source...
    26. Rockström J., Williams J., Daily G., Noble A., Matthews N., Gordon L., Wetterstrand H., DeClerck F., Shah M., Steduto P., de Fraiture C., Hatibu N., Unver O., Bird J., Sibanda L., Smith J. (2017): Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 46: 4-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    27. Skene K., Murray A. (2017): Sustainable Economics - Context, Challenges and Opportunities for the 21st-century Practitioner. London, Routledge: 1-480. Go to original source...
    28. Slavova I., Ivanova V. (2019): Corporate environmental responsibility within the circular economy context: Opportunities for development and sustainability. Economic Alternatives, 2: 184-204.
    29. Tirivayi N., Knowles M., Davis B. (2016): The interaction between social protection and agriculture: A review of evidence. Global Food Security, 10: 52-62. Go to original source...
    30. Toop T.A., Ward S., Oldfield T., Hull M., Kirby M.E., Theodorou M.K. (2017): AgroCycle - Developing a circular economy in agriculture. Energy Procedia, 123: 76-80. Go to original source...
    31. Tsiafouli M.A., Thébault E., Sgardelis S.P., de Ruiter P.C., van der Putten W.H., Birkhofer K., Hemerik L., de Vries F.T., Bardgett R.D., Brady M.V., Bjornlund L., Jørgensen H.B., Christensen S., D'Hertefeldt T., Hotes S., Gera Hol W.H., Frouz J., Liiri M., Mortimer S.R., Setälä H., Tzanopoulos J., Uteseny K., Pižl V., Stary J., Wolters V., Hedlund K. (2015): Intensive agriculture reduces soil biodiversity across Europe. Global Change Biology, 21: 973-985. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Zott C., Amit R. (2010): Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43: 216-226. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content