Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2006, 33(1):29-38 | DOI: 10.17221/3737-HORTSCI

Variability and genotype × cutting interactions for different nutritional components in Chenopodium album L.

A. Bhargava1, S. Shukla1, B. S. Dixit2, R. Bannerji2, D. Ohri1
1 Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India
2 Lipid Metabolism Laboratory, National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India

Thirteen germplasm lines of vegetable Chenopodium (C. album) were evaluated in a randomized block design with three replications to estimate the foliage yield and its seven contributing quality traits for three successive cuttings. The variability present in vegetable Chenopodium and interactions operating at various levels were also studied. The mean foliage yield was maximum for CA-II (3.03 ± 0.39 kg/plot), followed by CA-VII (2.94 ± 0.27 kg/plot) and CA-VI (2.41 ± 0.20 kg/plot). Moisture content showed a constant decrease in all germplasm lines with successive cuttings except for CA-IX in 3rd cutting. Protein content exhibited a strong trend of increase with each successive cutting and was maximum in 3rd cutting. Protein content showed the highest heritability in 1st cutting (96.35%) while the values were highest for ascorbic acid in 2nd and 3rd cutting. The carotenoid content and ascorbic acid exhibited consistently high genetic gain in all the three cuttings.

Keywords: Chenopodium album; foliage yield; carotenoids; protein; ascorbic acid; interactions

Published: March 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bhargava A, Shukla S, Dixit BS, Bannerji R, Ohri D. Variability and genotype × cutting interactions for different nutritional components in Chenopodium album L. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2006;33(1):29-38. doi: 10.17221/3737-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. BHARGAVA A., SHUKLA S., OHRI D., 2003a. Genetic variability and heritability of selected traits during different cuttings of vegetable Chenopodium. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 63: 359-360.
  2. BHARGAVA A., SHUKLA S., OHRI D., 2003b. Relative selection efficiency for foliage yield and quality characters in vegetable Chenopodium over different cuttings. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 5: 85-86. Go to original source...
  3. BHARGAVA A., SHUKLA S., OHRI D., 2005. Karyotypic studies on some cultivated and wild species of Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution (in press). Go to original source...
  4. FAO, 1998. Underutilized Andean food crops. Latin America and the Carribean. Rome.
  5. GIUSTI L., 1970. El genero Chenopodium en Argentina 1: Numeros de cromosomas. Darwiniana, 16: 98-105.
  6. GLICK D., 1954. Methods of Biochemical Analysis. Vol. 1. New York, Interscience Publishers Inc. Go to original source...
  7. JENSEN A., 1978. Chlorophylls and carotenoids. In: HELLEBUST J.A., CRAIGIE J.S. (eds.), Handbook of Physiological Methods: Physiological and Biochemical Methods. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 5-70.
  8. KOZIOL M.J., 1992. Chemical composition and nutritional value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 5: 35-68. Go to original source...
  9. LOWRY O.H., ROSEBROUGH N.J., FARR A.L., RANDALL R.J., 1951. Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. Journal of Biochemistry, 193: 265-275. Go to original source...
  10. PANSE V.G., SUKHATME P.V., 1978. Statistical methods for Agricultural Workers. New Delhi, ICAR.
  11. PARTAP T., 1990. Exploiting underexploited crop plants of mountain agriculture: Chenopods. In: RILEY K.W., MATEO N., HAWTIN G.C., YADAV R.P. (eds.), Mountain Agriculture and Crop Genetic Resources. New Delhi, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company Pvt. Ltd.: 165-183.
  12. PARTAP T., JOSHI B.D., GALWEY N.W., 1998. Chenopods: Chenopodium spp. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: 22.
  13. PRAKASH D., NATH P., PAL M., 1993. Composition, variation of nutritional contents in leaves, seed protein, fat and fatty acid profile of Chenopodium species. Journal of the Sciences of Food and Agriculture, 62: 203-205. Go to original source...
  14. SHUKLA S., SINGH S.P., 2000. Studies on genetic parameters in vegetable amaranth. Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 54: 133-135.
  15. SHUKLA S., PANDEY V., PACHAURI G., DIXIT B.S., BANERJI R., SINGH S.P., 2003. Nutritional contents of different foliage cuttings of vegetable amaranth. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 58: 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. SINGH R.K., CHAUDHARY B.D., 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. New Delhi, Kalyani Publishers.
  17. THAKUR M.C., JOSHI A.K., SINGH N.P., SHUKLA Y.R., 1997. Variability studies in heading lettuce (Lactuca sativa L). Horticultural Journal, 10: 43-49.
  18. WALLACE P.A., MARFO E.K., PLAHAR W.A., 1998. Nutritional quality and antinutritional composition of four non-conventional leafy vegetables. Food Chemistry, 61: 287-291. Go to original source...
  19. WATSON C.A., 1994. Official and Standardized Methods of Analysis. 3rd Edition. Cambridge, The Royal Society of Chemistry: 6.
  20. WATSON J.D., 1971. Investigations of the nutritive value of some Ghanaian food stuffs. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4: 95-111.
  21. WILSON H.D., 1980. Artificial hybridization among species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium. Systematic Botany, 5: 253-263. Go to original source...
  22. WILSON H.D., 1990. Quinua and relatives (Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium subsect. Cellulata). Economic Botany, 44: 92-110. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.