J. For. Sci., 2005, 51(10):446-457 | DOI: 10.17221/4578-JFS

Canopy gaps in two virgin beech forest reserves in Slovakia

L. DRÖßER, B. Von Lüpke
Institute of Silviculture, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

The formation, size distribution and percentage of gaps in two virgin deciduous forests are presented in two case studies. Gaps are defined as openings in the canopy above 2/3 of stand height. These gaps comprise 16% of the forest area in Have¹ová Reserve and 14.6% of the forest area in Kyjov Reserve. The estimated turnover time is 220 years. More than half the gaps were caused by the death of one tree, and 80% of the gaps were due to the death of up to 3 trees. The largest gap in Have¹ová Reserve was 0.40 ha, resulting from the death of 56 trees over the last 40 years. The area of the largest gap in Kyjov Reserve was 0.44 ha. It was caused by the death of 80 trees over the last 40 years. Such large gaps are scarce. 85% of the gaps are smaller than 250 m2. A correction of the bias towards the over-abundance of large gaps by line-transect sampling was made by estimating the percentage area of gaps of different size from the percentage length along the transects. In Have¹ová an attempt was made to date the death of trees that were still visible in the gaps. 1/5 of the trees initiated gaps by their death, while 4/5 of the trees extended gaps. While uprooted trees dominate in Have¹ová, breakage is most common in Kyjov.

Keywords: natural disturbance; gap size distribution; gap formation; European beech

Published: October 31, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
DRÖßER L, Von Lüpke B. Canopy gaps in two virgin beech forest reserves in Slovakia. J. For. Sci.. 2005;51(10):446-457. doi: 10.17221/4578-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. BARDEN L.S., 1989. Repeatability in forest gap research: Studies in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology, 70: 558-559. Go to original source...
  2. BIELEC-BAKOWSKA Z., 2003. Long-term variability of thunderstorm occurrence in Poland in the 20th century. Atmospheric Research, 67-68: 35-52. Go to original source...
  3. BUSING R.T., 2005. Tree mortality, canopy turnover and woody detritus in old cove forests of the Southern Appalachians. Ecology, 86: 73-84. Go to original source...
  4. DOBROVOLNÝ P., BRÁZDIL R., 2003. Documentary evidence on strong winds related to convective storms in the Czech Republic since AD 1500. Atmospheric Research, 67-68: 95-116. Go to original source...
  5. EMBORG J., CHRISTENSEN M., HEILMANN-CLAUSEN J., 2000. The structural dynamics of Suserov Skov, a nearnatural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. Forestry Ecology and Management?, 126: 173-189. Go to original source...
  6. KORPE¥ ©., 1967. Development and age structure of the virgin beech forest in Vihorlat-mountains (Kyjov). Biologia, 22: 285-303. (Please Slovak title).
  7. KORPE¥ ©., 1995. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Stuttgart, Jena, New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag: 310.
  8. LEIBUNDGUT H., 1956. Empfehlungen für die Baumklassenbildung und Methodik bei Versuchen über die Wirkung von Waldpflegemaßnahmen. IUFRO Sekt. 23. 10. Report (French summary).
  9. LIEBERMAN M., LIEBERMAN D., PERALTA R., 1989. Forests are not just Swiss cheese: Canopy Stereogeometry of non-gaps in tropical forests. Ecology, 70: 550- 552. Go to original source...
  10. MANNING D.B., SMALTSCHINSKI T., 2001. Natural gaps in a beech forest in Central Germany. In: MOUNTFORD E.P. (eds.), Natural canopy gap characteristics in European beech forests. NatMan Project WP2. Working Report 6. Deliverable 20.
  11. MÜLLER-USING S., BARTSCH N., 2003. Totholzdynamik eines Buchenbestandes (Fagus sylvatica L.) im Solling. Nachlieferung, Ursache und Zersetzung von Totholz. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 174: 122-131.
  12. NAKASHIZUKA T., 1988. Gap formation and species diversity of beech forests in Japan. In: Proceedings of 3rd IUFRO Beech Symposium in Zvolen: 169-181. Go to original source...
  13. NEUERT C., 1999. Die Dynamik räumlicher Strukturen in naturnahen Buchenwäldern Mitteleuropas. UFZ-Bericht, No. 20: 186.
  14. NUSKE R., NIESCHULZE J., 2004. Die Vegetationshöhe als Werkzeug zur Ermittlung von Bestandeshöhen. Eine Anwendung automatisierter digitaler Photogrammetrie in der Forstwissenschaft. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 175: 13-21.
  15. PEDERSEN B.S., HOWARD J.L., 2004. The influence of canopy gaps on overstory tree and forest growth rates in a mature mixed-age, mixed-species forest. Forestry Ecology and Management?, 196: 351-366. Go to original source...
  16. PETERS R., 1997. Beech Forests. Geobotany 24. Dordrecht, Boston, London, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  17. RICHTER J., 1990. Stammbruch, Windwurf und Naturverjüngung in Buchen-Naturwaldzellen. Schriftenreihe der LÖLF, 12: 86-96.
  18. RUNKLE J.R., 1982. Patterns of disturbance in some oldgrowth mesic forests of eastern North America. Ecology, 63: 1533-1546. Go to original source...
  19. RUNKLE J.R., 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests. In: PICKETT S.T.A., WHITE P.S. (eds.), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Orlando, Academic Press: 17-33. Go to original source...
  20. RUNKLE J.R., 1992. Guidelines and Sample Protocol for Sampling Forest Gaps. Forest Service, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-283. Go to original source...
  21. SAGHEB-TALEBI K.H., DELFAN ABAZARI B., 2003. Regeneration Process in Natural Uneven-aged Caspian Beech Forests of Iran. In: IUFRO International Interdisciplinary Conference and Field Tour in Finland and Sweden, June 8-17, 2003. Uneven-aged Forest Management: Alternative Forms, Practices and Constraints. Presented by Metla (Finnish Forest Research Institute), Collection of Abstracts (presented on June 10, 2003): 5.
  22. SCHMIDT W., 1996. Zur Entwicklung der Verjüngung in zwei Femelücken in einem Kalkbuchenwald. Forst und Holz, 51: 201-205.
  23. SANIGA M., SCHÜTZ J.P., 2002. Relation of dead wood course within the development cycle of selected virgin forests in Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science, 48: 513-528. Go to original source...
  24. SEYMOUR R.S., WHITE A.S., DEMAYNADIER P.G., 2002. Natural disturbance regimes in north-eastern North America - evaluating silvicultural systems using natural scales and frequencies. Forestry Ecology and Management?, 155: 357-367. Go to original source...
  25. STANDOVAR T., ASZALOS R., 2001. Natural gaps in beech forests in Hungary. In: MOUNTFORD E.P. (eds.), Natural canopy gap characteristics in European beech forests. NatMan Project WP2. Working Report 6. Deliverable 20.
  26. STANDOVAR T., KENDERES K., 2003. A review on natural stand dynamics in beechwoods of East Central Europe. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 1: 19-46. (cited in text) Go to original source...
  27. TABAKU V., MEYER P., 1999. Lückenmuster albanischer und mitteleuropäischer Buchenwälder unterschiedlicher Nutzungsintensität. Forstarchiv, 70: 87-97.
  28. TANAKA H., NAKASHIZUKA T., 1997. Fifteen years of canopy dynamics analyzed by aerial photographs in a temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecology, 78: 612-620. Go to original source...
  29. WATT A.S., 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. Journal of Ecology, 35: 1-22. Go to original source...
  30. YAMAMOTO S., NISHIMURA N., 1999. Canopy gap formation and replacement pattern of major tree species among developmental stages of beech (Fagus crenata) stands, Japan. Plant Ecology, 140: 167-176. Go to original source...
  31. ZEIBIG A., DIACI J., WAGNER S., 2004. Gap disturbance patterns of a beech virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia. In: HAMOR F.D., COMMARMOT B. (eds.), Natural forests in the temperate zone of Europe - Values and utilisation. International Conference in Mukachevo, Ukraine. October 13-17, 2003. Rakhiv, Carpathian Biosphere Reserve; Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.