Soil & Water Res., 2009, 4(10):S102-S110 | DOI: 10.17221/471-SWR

The influence of temporal rainfall distribution in the flood runoff modelling

Petr MÁCA1, Paul TORFS2
1 Department of Water Resources and Environmental Modelling, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Hydrology and Quantitative Water Management Group, Center for Water and Climate, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

The rainfall input is one of the main factors influencing the magnitude of the runoff response during a flood event. Its temporal and spatial distribution significantly contributes to the formation of hydrograph shape, peak discharge and flood volume. A novel approach to the evaluation of the role of the temporal rainfall pattern of hydrograph is presented in this contribution. The methodology shown is based on the coupling of the deterministic event based runoff model with the stochastic rainfall disaggregation model. The rainfall model simulates the hyetograph ensemble, which is the direct input to the calibrated event based runoff model. The event based runoff model calibration is based on the evaluation of real flood events. The rainfall ensemble is simulated according to the preservation of important statistical properties, which are estimated from the real rainfall data inputs. The proposed combination of two simulation techniques enables to generate the hydrograph ensemble upon a single flood event. The evaluation of the temporal rainfall distribution impact on the flood runoff response is performed through the determination of the selected rainfall runoff characteristics of the simulated hydrograph ensemble. The main result confirms the importance of the rainfall volume inputs and its temporal distribution on the flood runoff generation. The methodology shown enables to evaluate the potential of the real flood event to generate the flood event within the conditions of the small catchment scale.

Keywords: flood; hyetograph; ensemble simulation; peak discharge; flood volume

Published: December 31, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MÁCA P, TORFS P. The influence of temporal rainfall distribution in the flood runoff modelling. Soil & Water Res.. 2009;4(Special Issue 2):S102-110. doi: 10.17221/471-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Akan A.O., Houghtalen R.J. (2003): Urban Hydrology, Hydraulics and Stormwater Quality. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  2. Ball J.E. (1994): The influence of storm patterns on catchment response. Journal of Hydrology, 158: 285-303. Go to original source...
  3. Beven K.J. (2001): Rainfall - Runoff Modeling the Primer. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
  4. Blažková Š., Beven K.J. (1997): Flood frequency prediction for data limited catchments in the Czech Republic using a stochastic rainfall model and TOPMODEL. Journal of Hydrology 195: 256-278. Go to original source...
  5. Bronstert A., Bardossy A. (2003): Uncertainty of runoff modelling at the hillslope scale due to temporal variations of rainfall intensity. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28: 283-288 Go to original source...
  6. Diermanse F.L.M. (1999): Representationof natural hetrogeneity in rainfall runoff models. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 24: 787-792. Go to original source...
  7. Dingman S.L. (2002): Physical Hydrology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  8. Elleder L., Drbal K. (2002): The development and application of simple forecasting system for runoff response estimation in river network on fallen rainfall in ungauge basins. [Research Report VaV/510/2/99.] ČHMÚ Praha. (in Czech)
  9. Faures J.M., Goodrich D.C., Woolhiser D.L., Sorooshian S. (1995): Impact of small-scale spatial variability on runoff modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 173: 309-326. Go to original source...
  10. Goodrich D.C., Faures J.M., Woolhiser D.A., Lane J.L., Sorooshian S. (1995): Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective rainfall variablity. Journal of Hydrology, 173: 283-308. Go to original source...
  11. Hearman A.J., Hinz C. (2007): Sensitivity of point scale surface runoff predictions to rainfall resolution, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 965-982. Go to original source...
  12. Hobbs P.V., Locatelli J.D. (1978): Precipitation cores and generatin cells in a cyclonic storm. Journal of Atmosferic Science, 35: 230-241. Go to original source...
  13. Kuřík P. (2002): Methods for deriving of maximal discharges in ungauges outles of the watershed. [Ph.D. Thesis.] FLE CUA, Prague. (in Czech)
  14. Máca P. (2005): The influence of temporal rainfall distribution on extreme runoff formation in the catchment [Ph.D. Thesis.] FLE CUA, Prague. (in Czech)
  15. McCuen R. (1989): Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  16. Ngirane-Katashaya G.G., Wheather H.S. (1985): Hydrograph sensitivity to storm kinematics. Water Resources Research, 21: 337-345. Go to original source...
  17. Niemczynowics J. (1987): Storm traking using rain gauge data. Journal of Hydrology, 93: 135-152. Go to original source...
  18. Obled Ch., Wendling J., Beven K. (1994): The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfaal patterns: an evaluation using observed data. Journal of Hydrology, 159: 305-333. Go to original source...
  19. Ogden L.F., Julien P.Y. (1993): Runoff sensitivity to temporal and spatial patterns at runoff plane and small basin scales. Water Resources Research, 29: 2589-2597. Go to original source...
  20. Singh V.P. (1988): Hydrologic Systems Rainfall Runoff Modeling. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
  21. Singh V.P. (1996): Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water resources. Wiley Interscience, New York USA.
  22. Singh V.P. (1998): Effect of the direction of storm movement on planar flow. Hydrological Processes, 12: 147-170. Go to original source...
  23. Torfs P. (1997): Disaggregation in Hydrology. Wageningen Universtity.
  24. Torfs P. (1998): Statistical disaggregation of hydrological time series using wavelets. In: Proc. British Hydrological Society Int. Conf.: Hydrology in a Changing Environment. Exeter, 81-89.
  25. Vanmarcke E.H. (1983): Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. The MIT Press, Cambridge.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.