Plant Soil Environ., 2014, 60(9):433-438 | DOI: 10.17221/562/2014-PSE

The influence of sweet sorghum crop stand arrangement on biomass and biogas productionOriginal Paper

K. Pazderů1, J. Hodoval1, J. Urban1, J. Pulkrábek1, V. Pačuta2, J. Adamčík1
1 Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic

The possibility of sweet sorghum cultivation with different inter-row distances (20, 50, 75 cm) was verified in small scale plots with 3 cultivars (Bovital, Goliath, Sucrosorgho). The maize cv. Atletico (rows 75 cm) was used as a control. The influence of row width and cultivar on fresh and dry biomass, methane and biogas production per area was statistically significant. The methane and biogas production was evaluated in laboratory, via fermentation in Oxi Top Control Merck bottles. Generally, sorghum was more productive than maize. The highest biogas production per hectare was found in case of 25 cm row spacing. Goliath was the most yielding cultivar (in all parameters). The experiment proved possibility to produce biomass from sorghum in narrow rows for biogas stations in the Czech Republic.

Keywords: Sorghum bicolor; row width; methane yield; corn

Published: September 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pazderů K, Hodoval J, Urban J, Pulkrábek J, Pačuta V, Adamčík J. The influence of sweet sorghum crop stand arrangement on biomass and biogas production. Plant Soil Environ.. 2014;60(9):433-438. doi: 10.17221/562/2014-PSE.
Download citation

References

  1. Ayub M.A., Tanveer S.A., Nadeem M. (2002): Effect of different nitrogen levels and seed rates on growth, yield and quality of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) fodder. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science, 72: 648-650.
  2. Bishnoi U.R., Mays D. (2002): Tillage, weed control methods and row spacing affect soil properties and yield of grain sorghum and soybean. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, Auburn, 376-381.
  3. Bolsen K.K., Moore K.J., Coblentz W.K., Siefers M.K., White J.S. (2003): Sorghum silage. In: Buxton D.R., Muck R.E., Harrison J.H. (eds.): Silage Science and Technology. ASA/CSSA/SSSA, Madison, 609-632. Go to original source...
  4. Gonzalez R.Y., Graterol Y. (2000): Effect of row spacing and fertilizer application on yield and yield components of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) in Portuguesa, Venezuela. Revista Unellez de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Produccion Agricola, 17: 108-124.
  5. Hermuth J., Janovská D., Strašil Z., Usťak S., Hýsek J. (2012): Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench: Possibilities of Utilization in Czech Republic Conditions. VÚRV, Praha, 47.
  6. Kára J., Pastorek Z., Přibyl E. (2007): The Production and Utilization of Biogas in Agriculture. VÚZT, Praha, 120.
  7. Klimiuk E., Pokój T., Budzyňski W., Dubis B. (2010): Theoretical and observed biogas production from plant biomass of different fibre contents. Bioresource Technology, 101: 9527-9535. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kožnarová V., Klabzuba J. (2002): Recommendation of World Meteorological Organization to describing meteorological or climatological conditions. Rostlinná výroba, 48: 190-192. Go to original source...
  9. Malik M.F.A., Hussain M., Awan S.I. (2007): Yield response of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to seed rate and row spacing under rain-fed conditions. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 3: 95-97.
  10. Mokadem S.A., Taha E.M., El-Geddawy I.H., Bekheet M.A. (2002): Response of spring sugar-cane to some row spacing and intercropping with sorghum and soybean. Egyptian Journal of Agriculture Research, 78: 197-214.
  11. Orak A., Kavdr I. (1994): The effect of different seed rates and inter-row spaces on yield and yield parameters of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor Moench) for silage under farmer's conditions. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 3: 139-148.
  12. Petříková V., Sladký V., Strašil Z., Šafařík M., Usťak S., Váňa J. (2006): Energy Crops. 1 st Edition. Profi Press, Praha, 127.
  13. Ratnavathi C.V., Chakravarthy S.K., Komala V.V., Chavan U.D., Patil J.V. (2011): Sweet sorghum as feedstock for biofuel production: A review. Sugar Technology, 13: 399-407. Go to original source...
  14. Sanderson M.A., Jones R.M., Ward J., Wolfe R. (1992): Silage sorghum performance trial at Stephenville. Forage Research in Texas. Report PR-5018. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Stephenville, 68.
  15. Scott S., Gordon B., Taylor R., Duncan S., Fjell D. (1999): Narrow-row Grain Sorghum Production in Kansas. Kansas State University, 1-4.
  16. Smutka L., Benešová I., Pulkrábek J., Belova A., Urban J. (2013): Development and position of sugar industry in the European Union in 2000-2011. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské, 129: 22-27.
  17. Straka F., Ciahotný K. (2010): Biogas - Manual for Education, Designing and Operation of Biogas Systems. GAS, Praha, 305.
  18. Taylor J.R.N., Belton P.S., Beta T., Duodu K.G. (2014): Increasing the utilisation of sorghum, millets and pseudocereals: Developments in the science of their phenolic phytochemicals, biofortification and protein functionality. Journal of Cereal Science, 59: 257-275. Go to original source...
  19. Varga B., Varga-László E., Bencze S., Balla K., Veisz O. (2013): Water use of winter cereals under well-watered and droughtstressed conditions. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59: 150-155. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.