Hort. Sci. (Prague), 2008, 35(2):83-89 | DOI: 10.17221/642-HORTSCI

Impacts of the substrate medium on tomato yield and fruit quality in soilless cultivation

N. G. Tzortzakis1,2, C. D. Economakis2
1 Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, Chania, Greece
2 Institute of Olive Tree and Subtropical Plants of Chania, Chania, Greece

The performance and suitability of different substrates for the soilless culture of tomato plants (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill., cv. Belladona) were studied over a 5-month period in a closed soilless culture system employing five different substrates (perlite, pumice or maize and their mixtures with 50% shredded maize stems in an unheated glasshouse). Plants grown in a maize stem-containing medium produced earlier fruits, followed by pumice. Plants grown in pumice and perlite substrates obtained lower total yield; a higher yield was associated with the addition of maize shredded stems. Pumice + 50% maize and 100% maize produced higher total number of fruits per plant. Fruit quality parameters such as mean fruit weight, fruit firmness, total soluble solids, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid and carotenoids were influenced by the treatment, while EC, pH and dry matter content were not. The results suggest that the addition of maize in perlite and pumice could improve inorganic substrates properties for tomato soilless culture, leading to higher yields and better fruit quality.

Keywords: earliness; fruit quality; organic materials; perlite; pumice; carotenoids; soilless culture; tomato; yield

Published: June 30, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tzortzakis NG, Economakis CD. Impacts of the substrate medium on tomato yield and fruit quality in soilless cultivation. Hort. Sci. (Prague). 2008;35(2):83-89. doi: 10.17221/642-HORTSCI.
Download citation

References

  1. BOHME M., HOANG L., VORWERK R., 2001. Effect of different substrates and mineral as well as organic nutrition on the growth of cucumber in closed substrates systems. Acta Horticulturae, 548: 165-172. Go to original source...
  2. CLINTON S.K., EMENHISER C., SCHWARTZ S.J., BOSTWICK D.G., WILLIAMS A.W., MOORE B.J., ERDMAN J.W., 1996. Cis-trans lycopene isomers, carotenoids and retinal in the human prostate. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 5: 823-833.
  3. DAVIES J., HOBSON G., 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit - the influence of environment, nutrition and genotype. In: McGLASOON W., CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 15: 205-281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. DE PASCALE S., MAGGIO A., FOGLIANO V., AMBROSINO P., RITIENI A., 2001. Irrigation with saline water improves carotenoids content and antioxidant activity of tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 76: 447-453. Go to original source...
  5. DONNAN R., 1998. Hydroponics around the world. Practical Hydroponics & Greenhouses July/August 1998, 41: 18-25. organic substrates for hydroponic cucumber production. Acta Horticulturae, 401: 219-224.
  6. HELRICH K. (ed), 1990. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid). Virginia, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2. 15th Ed.: 1058-1059.
  7. ISLAM S., KHAN S., ITO T., MARUO T., SHINOHARA Y., 2002. Characterization of the physico-chemical properties of environmentally friendly organic substrates in relation to rockwool. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 72: 143-148. Go to original source...
  8. LEONI S., CADINU M., GRUDINA R., MADEDDU B., 1988. Results from three tomato cultivation cycles in soilless culture in Mediterranean environment. International Society for Soilless Culture (ISOSC), Proceedings: 265-273.
  9. OSHIMA S., OJIMA F., SAKAMOTO H., ISHIGURO Y., TERAO J., 1996. Supplementation with carotenoids inhibits singlet-oxygen-mediated oxidation of human plasma low-density lipoprotein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 44: 2306-2309. Go to original source...
  10. PADEM H., ALAN R., 1994. The effect of some substrates on yield and chemical composition of pepper under greenhouse conditions. Acta Horticulturae, 366: 445-451. Go to original source...
  11. PETERSEN K.K., WILLUMSEN J., KAACK K., 1998. Composition and taste of tomatoes as affected by increased salinity and different salinity sources. Journal of Horticultural Science, 73: 205-215. Go to original source...
  12. TRAKA-MAVRONA E., GERASOPOULOS D., PRITSA T., MALOUPA E., 2001. Growth, fruit yield and quality of tomato in relation to substrate and nutrient source in a soilless culture system. Acta Horticulturae, 548: 173-179. Go to original source...
  13. TZORTZAKIS N.G., ECONOMAKIS C.D., 2005. Shredded maize stems as an alternative substrate medium. Effect on growth, flowering and yield of tomato in soilless culture. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11: 57-70. Go to original source...
  14. VERDONCK O., 1975. Horticultural substrates. Wageningen, International Agricultural Centre: 88.
  15. VESSEUR W.P., 1990. Tomato tasting and consumer attitude. Acta Horticulturae, 259: 83-89. Go to original source...
  16. XU H., GAUTHIER L., GOSSELIN A., 1995. Effects of fertigation management on growth and photosynthesis of tomato plants grown in peat, rockwool and NFT. Scientia Horticulturae, 63: 11-20. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.