Res. Agr. Eng., 2015, 61(4):170-176 | DOI: 10.17221/69/2013-RAE

Pyrolysis of sandbox (Hura crepitans) shell: Effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar yieldOriginal Paper

F.A. Ola, S.O. Jekayinfa
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria

Pyrolysis of sandbox shell was carried out with the aim of investigating the effect of pyrolysis parameters on the pyrolysis process and identifies production conditions for the yield of biochar. Parameters investigated were heating temperature (400, 500 and 600°C), heating time (10, 20, and 30 min) and particle size of feedstock (0-1.0, 1.0-2.5 and 2.5-5.0 mm) in a laboratory batch pyrolysis process. The experiment was designed by applying response surface methodology through a three-factor full factorial design. The quadratic polynomial model obtained explains adequately the modelled response with coefficient of correlation, R2 value of 0.8698. All the three variables significantly affected the biochar yield from sandbox shell, with heating temperature being the most effective followed by heating time and particle size of feedstock. Maximum biochar yield of 39.65% wt. occurred at 400°C heating temperature and 10 min heating time with 1.0-2.5 mm particle size.

Keywords: residue; thermal; reactor; model; factorial

Published: December 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ola FA, Jekayinfa SO. Pyrolysis of sandbox (Hura crepitans) shell: Effect of pyrolysis parameters on biochar yield. Res. Agr. Eng.. 2015;61(4):170-176. doi: 10.17221/69/2013-RAE.
Download citation

References

  1. Abnias F., Wan Daud W.M. A., Sahu J.N. (2011): Optimization and characterization studies on biooil production from palm shell by pyrolysis using response surface methodology. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35: 3604-3616. Go to original source...
  2. Aquino F.L., Hernandez J.R., Capareda S.C. (2007): Elucidating the solid, liquid and gaseous products from pyrolysis of cotton gin trash. St. Joseph. ASABE Paper No. 076083.
  3. Boateng A.A., Hicks K.B., Flores R.A., Gutsol A. (2006): Pyrolysis of hull-enriched byproducts from the scarification of hulled barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 78: 95-103. Go to original source...
  4. Cantrell K.B., Kyoung S.R., Patrick G.H. (2008): Thermal characterization of swine manure: bioenergy feedstock potential. St. Joseph, ASABE Paper No. 084631. Go to original source...
  5. Demiral I., Ayan E.A. (2011): Pyrolysis of grape bagasse: effect of pyrolysis conditions on the product yields and characterization of the liquid product. Bioresource Technology, 102: 3946-3951. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Dairo O.U., Olayanju T.M.A., Ajisegiri E.S.A., Awonorin O.S., Alamu O.J. (2011): Influence of catalyst amount and alcohol-seed ratio on the production of bio-diesel from raw castor oil bean seed using in-situ technique. LAUTECH Journal of Engineering and Techonolgy, 6: 45-52.
  7. DiPardo J. (2000): Outlook for biomass ethanol production and demand. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC. Available at www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/pdf/biomass.pdf
  8. Ertas M., Alma M.H. (2010): Pyrolysis of Laurel (Lurus nobilis L.) extraction residues in a fixed-bed reactor: characterization of biooil and biochar. Journal of Analytical Applied Pyrolysis, 88: 22-29. Go to original source...
  9. Francis J.K. (1990): Hura crepitans L. sandbox, grinder, Jabillo. SO-ITF-SM-38.
  10. Glassner D., Hettenhaus J., Schechinger T. (1999): Corn stover potential: recasting the corn sweetner industry. CORE4 and CTIC. Available at http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/Core4/StoverNCNU.pdf
  11. Miranda R., Sosa-Blanco C., Bustos-Martínez D., Vasile, C. (2009): Pyrolysis of textile wastes. I. kinetics and yields. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 80: 489-495. Go to original source...
  12. Neves D., Thunman H., Matos A., Tarelho L., Gomer-Bera A. (2011): Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30: 1-20. Go to original source...
  13. Sensor S., Kaynar I. (2006): Biooil production from soybean (Glycine max L.); fuel properties of biooil. Industrial Crops and Products, 23: 99-105. Go to original source...
  14. Sims R. (2003): Climate change solutions from biomass, bioenergy and biomaterials. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development. Invited Overview, Vol. V.
  15. Putun A.E., Onal E., Uzun B.B., Ozbay N. (2007): Comparison between the slow and fast pyrolysis of tobacco residue. Industrial Crops and Products, 26: 307-314. Go to original source...
  16. Wilhelm W.W., Johnson J.M.F., Hatfield J.L., Voorhees W.B., Linden D.R. (2004): Crop and soil productivity response to corn residue removal: a review of the literature. Agronomy Journal, 96: 1-17. Go to original source...
  17. Williams P.T., Nugranad N. (2000): Comparison of products from the pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of rice husks. Energy, 25: 493-513. Go to original source...
  18. Yorgun S., Simsek Y.E. (2008): Catalytic pyrolysis of miscanthus × giganteus over activated alumina. Bioresource Technology, 99: 8095-8100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Zanzi R., Sjotrom K., Bjornbom E. (2002). Rapid pyrolysis of agricultural residues at high temperature. Biomass and Bioenergy, 23: 357-366. Go to original source...
  20. Zhang L., Xu C., Champagne P. (2010): Overview of recent advances in thermochemical conversion of biomass. Energy Conversion and Management, 51: 969-982. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.