J. For. Sci., 2010, 56(4):147-153 | DOI: 10.17221/76/2009-JFS

Comparison of output results from two programmes for hemispherical image analysis: Gap Light Analyser and WinScanopy

B. Jarčuška1, S. Kucbel2, P. Jaloviar2
1 Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Zvolen, Slovakia
2 Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

We compare the results of the analysis of hemispherical images (of a broadleaved and a coniferous forest) obtained using the Gap Light Analyser (GLA) software and the results obtained by analyzing the same images with the aid of WinScanopy. The two packages were used to calculate relative total, relative diffuse and relative direct transmittance, canopy openness, and leaf area index. Our aim was to find out whether it is possible to compare the studies using different software packages for determining light conditions. The binary pixel classification of images of canopy and sky was performed automatically (in the case of Gap Light Analyser, using the SideLook programme). The threshold values determined by the SideLook programme were lower compared to the WinScanopy, which was also reflected in the evaluated output results. There was a strong positive correlation between the results obtained with the two software packages (R2 ranges from 0.814 to 0.999). However, when the Gap Light Analyser analysis was applied to the threshold values obtained with the SideLook, the output results mostly manifested systematic differences in comparison with the output results obtained using the WinScanopy. Using the same threshold value in both programmes, the differences between the output values were quite small (a minimum of 0.038 m2.m-2 for LAI in the spruce forest and a maximum of 0.738% for total relative transmittance also in the spruce forest). The differences in some characteristics were statistically significant, on the other hand, both the photo series had only the identical direct transmittance values. The observed differences can be explained by differences in the calibration of the used camera-lens pair, different image registration techniques and different theoretical background and models used in the two software packages. It follows that it is also necessary to be aware of possible differences when comparing the outputs of the two compared software packages analyzing photos obtained applying the same methodical approach.

Keywords: analyses; Gap Light Analyser; hemispherical photography; light; WinScanopy

Published: April 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jarčuška B, Kucbel S, Jaloviar P. Comparison of output results from two programmes for hemispherical image analysis: Gap Light Analyser and WinScanopy. CAAS Agricultural Journals. 2010;56(4):147-153. doi: 10.17221/76/2009-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anonymous (2007): WinScanopy 2006a,b (Manual). Québec, Régent Instruments Canada Inc.: 128.
    2. Barna M., Schieber B., Cicák A. (2009): Effect of postcutting changes in site conditions on the morphology and phenology of naturally regenerated beech seedlings (Fagus sylvatica L.). Polish Journal of Ecology, 57: 461-472.
    3. Bílek L., Remeš J., Zahradník D. (2009): Natural regeneration of senescent even-aged beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands under the conditions of Central Bohemia. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 145-155. Go to original source...
    4. Brown N., Jennings S., Wheeler P., Nabe-Nielsen J. (2000): An improved method for the rapid assessment of forest understorey light environments. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37: 1044-1053. Go to original source...
    5. Dobrowolska D. (2008): Growth and development of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) regeneration and restoration of the species in the Karkonosze Mountains. Journal of Forest Science, 54: 398-408. Go to original source...
    6. Frazer G.W., Trofymow J.A., Lertzman K.P. (1997): A method for estimating canopy openness, effective leaf area index, and photosynthetically active photon flux density using hemispherical photography and computerized image analysis techniques. Information Report BC-X-373. Victoria, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre: 81.
    7. Frazer G.W., Canham C.D., Lertzman K.P. (1999): Gap Light Analyzer (GLA): Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true colour fisheye photographs. Users manual and program documentation. Burnaby, Simon Fraser University; Millbrook - New York, Institute of Ecosystem Studies: 36. Available at http://www.rem.sfu.ca/forestry/downloads/Files/GLAV2UsersManual.pdf (accessed March 31, 2008)
    8. Frazer G.W., Fournier R.A., Trofymow J.A., Hall R.J. (2001): A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 109: 249-263. Go to original source...
    9. Glončák P. (2009): Influence of light conditions on variability and diversity of field-layer vegetation in the mountain spruce natural forests. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 51 (Suppl. 1): 69-83. (in Slovak)
    10. Hale S.E., Edwards C. (2002): Comparison of film and digital hemispherical photography across a wide range of canopy densities. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 112: 51-56. Go to original source...
    11. Inoue A., Yamamoto K., Mizoue N., Kawahara Y. (2004a): Calibrating view angle and lens distortion of the Nikon fish-eye converter FC-E8. Journal of Forest Research, 9: 177-181. Go to original source...
    12. Inoue A., Yamamoto K., Mizoue N., Kawahara Y. (2004b): Effects of image quality, size and camera type on forest light environment estimates using digital hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 126: 89-97. Go to original source...
    13. Jarčuška B. (2008): Methodological overview to hemispherical photography, demonstrated on an example of the software GLA. Folia Oecologica, 35: 66-69.
    14. Jennings S.B., Brown N.D., Sheil D. (1999): Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry, 72: 59-73. Go to original source...
    15. Jonckheere I., Fleck S., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Coppin P., Weiss M., Baret F. (2004): Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination. Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 121: 19-35. Go to original source...
    16. Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Coppin P. (2005): Assessment of automatic gap fraction estimation of forests from digital hemispherical photography. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 132: 96-114. Go to original source...
    17. Lee Y.J., Alfaro R.I., Van Sickle G.A. (1983): Tree-crown defoliation measurement from digitized photographs. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 956-961. Go to original source...
    18. Nobis M. (2005): SideLook 1.1 - Imaging software for the analysis of vegetation structure with true-colour photographs: 6. Available at http://www.appleco.ch (accessed March 31, 2008)
    19. Nobis M., Hunziker U. (2005): Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 128: 243-250. Go to original source...
    20. Petritan A.M., von Lüpke B., Petritan I.C. (2009): Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 61-74. Go to original source...
    21. Rozenbergar D., Mikac S., Anić I., Diaci J. (2007): Gap regeneration patterns in relationship to light heterogeneity in two old-growth beech - fir forest reserves in South East Europe. Forestry, 80: 431-443. Go to original source...
    22. Szwagrzyk J., Szewczyk J. (2008): Is natural regeneration of forest stands a continuous process? A case study of an oldgrowth forest of the Western Carpathians. Polish Journal of Ecology, 56: 623-633.
    23. Szymura T.H., Dunajski A., Aman I., Makowski M., Szymura M. (2007): The spatial pattern and microsites requirements of Abies alba natural regeneration in the Karkonosze Mountains. Dendrobiology, 58: 51-57.
    24. Špulák O. (2008): Assimilation apparatus variability of beech transplants grown in variable light conditions of blue spruce shelter. Journal of Forest Science, 54: 491-496. Go to original source...
    25. Valladares F., Niinemets Ü. (2008): Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 39: 237-257. Go to original source...
    26. Wagner S., Madsen P., Ammer C. (2009): Evaluation of different approaches for modelling individual tree seedling height growth. Trees, 23: 701-715. Go to original source...
    27. Zhang Y., Chen J.M., Miller J.R. (2005): Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 133: 166-181. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content