Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2016, 61(10):462-472 | DOI: 10.17221/91/2015-CJAS

Genetic diversity within and gene flow between three draught horse breeds using genealogical informationOriginal Paper

H. Vostrá-Vydrová2, L. Vostrý1,2, B. Hofmanová1, E. Krupa2, Z. Veselá2, J. Schmidová1,2
1 Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Animal Science, Prague-Uhříněves, Czech Republic

Three draught horse breeds are maintained in the Czech Republic: the Silesian Noriker (SN), the Noriker (N), and the Czech-Moravian Belgian (CMB). Because the SN and CMB populations are currently closed to outside breeding and are endangered (Genetic Resources), the loss of the genetic variation these horses represent is concerning. Genetic diversity within and between these three breeds and their population structures was analyzed based on pedigree information. Our goal was to identify and quantify factors that affected their genetic variability. The effective population size was analyzed in each breed. The numbers of generations were 22, 32, and 32 for the SN, N, and CMB breeds, respectively, with average equivalent known generations of 9.81, 8.45, and 8.91, respectively. The effective numbers of founders and ancestors contributing to the current genetic pool were, respectively, 69.42 and 22.32 for the SN breed, 98.48 and 42.20 for the N breed, and 43.33 and 23.32 for the CMB breed. The average inbreeding coefficients were 4.6%, 2%, and 4% for the SN, N, and CMB breeds, respectively, and the average inbreeding rate was 0.5% for the SN and CMB breeds and 0.2% for the N breed. The corresponding estimates of effective population size were 95, 195, and 101 for the SN, N, and CMB breeds, respectively. These statistics suggest that the genetic variability has decreased, and without changes in breeding strategy the genetic variability might continue to decline. Using genealogical F-statistics, small genetic differences were identified between the analyzed populations (FST = 0.02).

Keywords: genetic drift, inbreeding, Silesian Noriker, Noriker, Czech-Moravian Belgian horse

Published: October 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vostrá-Vydrová H, Vostrý L, Hofmanová B, Krupa E, Veselá Z, Schmidová J. Genetic diversity within and gene flow between three draught horse breeds using genealogical information. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2016;61(10):462-472. doi: 10.17221/91/2015-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alvarez I., Royo L.J., Gutierrez J.P., Fernandez I., Arranz J.J., Goyache F. (2008): Relationship between genealogical and microsatellite information characterizing losses of genetic variability: empirical evidence from the rare Xalda sheep breed. Livestock Science, 115, 80-88. Go to original source...
  2. Bartolome E., Goyache F., Molina A., Cervantes I., Valera M., Gutierrez J.P. (2010): Pedigree estimation of the (sub) population contribution to the total gene diversity: the horse coat colour case. Animal, 4, 867-875. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Boichard D., Maignel L., Verrier E. (1997): The value using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics Selection Evolution, 29, 5-23. Go to original source...
  4. Caballero A., Toro M.A. (2000): Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetical Research, 75, 331-343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Caballero A., Toro M.A. (2002): Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivide populations. Conservation Genetics, 3, 289-299. Go to original source...
  6. Cervantes I., Goyache F., Molina A., Valera M., Gutierrez J.P. (2008): Application of individual increase in inbreeding to estimate realized effective sizes from real pedigrees. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 125, 301-310. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cervantes I., Gutierrez J.P., Molina A., Goyache F., Valera M. (2009): Genealogical analyses in open populations: the case of three Arab-derived Spanish horse breeds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 126, 335-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Druml T., Baumung R., Solkner J. (2009): Pedigree analysis in the Austrian Noriker draught horse: genetic diversity and the impact of breeding for coat colour on population structure. Journal of Animal Breeding Genetics, 126, 348-356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Falconer D.S., Mackay T.F.C. (1996): Introduction into Quantitative Genetics. Longman House, Harlow, UK.
  10. FAO (1998): Secondary guidelines for development of farm animal genetic resources management plans. Management of small populations at risk. FAO, Rome, Italy.
  11. Fernandez J., Villanueva B., Pong-Wong R., Toro M.A. (2005): Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs. Genetics, 170, 1313-1321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Goyache F., Gutierrez J.P., Fernandez I., Gomez E., Alvarez I., Diez J., Royo L.J. (2003): Using pedigree information to monitor genetic variability of endangered populations: the Xalda sheep breed of Asturias as an example. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 120, 95-103. Go to original source...
  13. Gutierrez J.P., Marmi J., Goyache F., Jordana J. (2005): Pedigree information reveals moderate to high levels of inbreeding and a weak population structure in the endangered Catalonian donkey breed. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 122, 378-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Gutierrez J.P., Cervantes I., Molina A., Valera M., Goyache F. (2008): Individual increase in inbreeding allows estimating effective size from pedigrees. Genetics Selection Evolution, 40, 359-378. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Hofmanova B., Pribanova M., Majzlik I., Vostry L., VostraVydrova H. (2014): Population study of three breeds of cold blooded horses in the Czech Republic. In: Proc. 65th Annu. Mtg., European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Copenhagen, Denmark, 379. Go to original source...
  16. James J.W. (1972): Computation of genetic contribution from pedigrees. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 42, 272-273. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Lacy R.C. (1989): Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. Zoo Biology, 8, 111-123. Go to original source...
  18. Lacy R.C. (1995): Clarification of genetic terms and their use in the management of captive populations. Zoo Biology, 14, 565-578. Go to original source...
  19. MacCluer J., Boyce B., Dyke L., Weitzkamp D., Pfenning A., Parsons C. (1983): Inbreeding and pedigree structure in Standardbred horses. Journal of Heredity, 74, 394-399. Go to original source...
  20. Maignel L., Boichard D., Verrier E. (1996): Genetic variability of French dairy breeds estimated from pedigree information. Interbull Bulletin, 14, 49-54.
  21. Meuwissen T.H.E., Woolliams J.A. (1994): Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 89, 1019-1026. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Nagy I., Curik I., Radnai I., Cervantes I., Gyovai P., Baumung R., Farkas J., Szendro Z. (2010): Genetic diversity and population structure of the synthetic Pannon White rabbit revealed by pedigree analyses. Journal of Animal Science, 88, 1267-1275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Nei M. (1987): Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, USA. Go to original source...
  24. Pjontek J., Kadlecik O., Kasarda R., Horny M. (2012): Pedigree analysis in four Slovak endangered horse breeds. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 57, 54-64. Go to original source...
  25. Rodriganez J., Toro M.A., Rodriguez M.C., Silio L. (1998): Effects of founder allele survival and inbreeding depression on litter size in a closed line of Large White pigs. Animal Science, 67, 573-582. Go to original source...
  26. Toro M.A., Fernandez J., Caballero A. (2009): Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. Livestock Science, 120, 174-195. Go to original source...
  27. Valera M., Molina A., Gutierrez J.P., Gomez J., Goyache F. (2005): Pedigree analysis in the Andalusian horse: population structure, genetic variability and influence of the Carthusian strain. Livestock Production Science, 95, 57-66. Go to original source...
  28. VanRaden P.M. (1992): Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation of large populations. Journal of Dairy Science, 75, 3136-3144. Go to original source...
  29. Vicente A.A., Carolino N., Gama L.T. (2012): Genetic diversity in the Lusitano horse breed assessed by pedigree analysis. Livestock Science, 148, 16-25. Go to original source...
  30. Vostra-Vydrova H., Vostry L., Hofmanova B., Krupa E., Zavadilova L. (2016): Pedigree analysis of the endangered Old Kladruber horse population. Livestock Science, 185, 17-23. Go to original source...
  31. Wright S. (1969): The Theory of Gene Frequencies: Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 2. Chicago University Press, Chicago, USA.
  32. Zechner P., Zohman F., Solkner J., Bodi I., Habe F., Marti E., Brem G. (2002): Analysis of diversity and population structure in the Lipizzan horse breed based on pedigree information. Livestock Production Science, 77, 137-146. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.