Monitoring of spasticity and functional ability in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury with a functional electrical stimulation cycling system

Authors

  • Werner Reichenfelser
  • Harald Hackl
  • Josef Hufgard
  • Josef Kastner
  • Karin Gstaltner
  • Margit Gföhler

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0979

Keywords:

spasticity, SCI, paraplegia, tetraplegia, FES, cycling, 10MWT.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the integration of motor function and spasticity assessment of individuals with spinal cord injury into cycling therapy. Methods: Twenty-three participants with incomplete spinal cord injury performed 18 training sessions (standard deviation (SD) 14) on an instrumented tricycle combined with functional electrical stimulation. Each therapy session included a power output test to assess the participants? ability to pedal actively and a spasticity test routine that measures the legs? resistance to the pedalling motion. In addition, the required time for the therapy phases was monitored. Results: The results of the power output test showed a monthly increase in power output of 4. 4 W (SD 13. 7) at 30 rpm and 18. 2 W (SD 23. 9) at 60 rpm. The results of the spasticity assessment indicate a 12. 2 W (SD 9. 7) reduction in resistance at 60 rpm after the FES training for the subject group with spasticity. Conclusion: In clinical use over a time-period of 2 years this combined form of therapy and motor function assessment was well accepted by participants. The active power output test and the spasticity test routine offered a proper tool to monitor participants? progress in functional rehabilitation and changes in spasticity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2012-04-10

How to Cite

Reichenfelser, W., Hackl, H., Hufgard, J., Kastner, J., Gstaltner, K., & Gföhler, M. (2012). Monitoring of spasticity and functional ability in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury with a functional electrical stimulation cycling system. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(5), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0979

Issue

Section

Original Report