Comparison of Pipette and Laser Diffraction Methods in Determining the Granulometric Content of Fluvial Sediment Samples

Main Article Content

Ágnes Kun
Orsolya Katona
György Sipos
Károly Barta

Abstract

Nowadays there is a growing demand for rapid and accurate determination of grain size distribution. The conventional pipette method is time-consuming and provides less detailed data compared to recently introduced methods. However, in Hungarian practice the pipette method is still considered to be the standard one, as there are a long series of measurements, and grain size thresholds used in sedimentology and soil sciences are based on this approach. The aim of our research was to determine the comparability of the laser diffraction method (LDM) with the conventional pipette method (PM), in order to investigate the controversial question on the interchangeability of the two methods. Based on our measurements on some representative fluvial sediment samples, we found that the largest difference in results can be expected in the silty grain size range. However if the main fractions (clay, silt, sand) are considered the methods provided similar very results, and correlation factors were above 0.92. In all, the LDM has a clear advantage because of its speed, reproducibility and fewer possibilities for operator failure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kun, Ágnes, Orsolya Katona, György Sipos, and Károly Barta. 2013. “Comparison of Pipette and Laser Diffraction Methods in Determining the Granulometric Content of Fluvial Sediment Samples”. Journal of Environmental Geography 6 (3-4):49-54. https://doi.org/10.2478/jengeo-2013-0006.
Section
Articles

Funding data

References

Beuselinck, L., Govers, G., Poesen, J., Degraer, G., Froyen, L. 1998. Grain-size analysis by lase diffractiometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method. Catena 32, 193-208.

Blott, S.J., Pye, K. 2012. Particle size scales and classification of sediment types based on particle size distributions: review and recommended procedures. Sedimentology 59, 2071-2096.10.1111/j.1365-3091.2012.01335.x

Bork, H.R. 1989. Soil erosion during the past millennium in central Europe and its significance within the geomorphodynamics of the Holocene. Catena Supplement 15, 121-131.

Buurman, P., Pape, Th., Reijneveld, J.A., De Jong, F., Van Gelder, E. 2001. Laser-diffraction and pipette-method grain sizing of Dutch sediments: correlations for fine fractions of marine, fluvial and loess samples. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences 80 (2), 49-57.

De Vos, B.V. 2001. Relationship between soil textural fractions determined by sieve-pipette method and laser diffratiometry. Wetenschappelijke Instelling van deVlaamse Gemeenschap, Instituut voor Bosbouw enWildbeheer

Di Stefano, C., Ferro, V., Mirabile, S. 2010. Comparison between grain size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods. Biosystems Engineering 106, 205-215.

Ferro, V., Mirabile, S. 2009. Comparing particle size disturbation analysis by sedimentation and laser diffraction method. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 2, 35-43.

Fritsch 2009. Particle sizing - laser diffraction, http://www.benelux-scientific.be/ileadmin/user_files/pdf/poederkarakterisatie/laserd/LASER_DIFFRACTION.pdf, available 2012-08-31

Goossens, D. 2008. Techniques to measure grain-size distributions of loamy sediments: comparative study of ten instruments for wet analysis. Sedimentology 55, 65-96.

Hernadi, H., Makó, A., Kucsera, S., Szabóné Kele, G., Sisák, I. 2008. A talaj mechanikai összetételének meghatározása különböző módszerekkel (Determination of soil mechanical composition by different methods). Talajvédelmikülönszám

Konert, M., Vandenberghe, J. 1997. Comparation of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology 44, 523-535.

Loizeau, J.L., Arbouille, D., Santiago, S., Vernet J.P. 1994. Evaluation of wide range laser diffraction grain size analyser for use with sediments. Sedimentology 41, 353-361.

Madarász, B., Jakab, G., Szalai, Z., Juhos, K. 2012. Lézeres szemcseösszetétel elemzés néhány előkészítő eljárásának vizsgálata nagy szervesanyag-tartalmú talajokon (Examination of sample preparation methods for the laser grain size analysis of soils with high organic matter content). Agrokémia és talajtan 61 (2), 381-398.

McCave, I.N., Bryant, R.J., Cool, H.F., Coughanowr, C.A. 1986. Evaluation of laser-diffraction-size analyser for use with natural sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 56, 561-564.

Murray, M.R. 2002. Is laser particle size determination possible for carbonate-rich lake sediments? J. Paleolimnol. 27, 173-183.

Ryzak, M., Bieganowski, A. 2011. Methodological aspects of determining soil particle-size distribution using the laser diffraction method. Journal of Plant Nutrition and SoilScience 17, 624-633.

Xu, R., Di Guida, O.A. 2003. Comparison of sizing small particles using different technologies. Powder. Technology 132, 145-153.