초록

공급사슬상의 기업은 두 유형이 존재한다. 그 중 한 유형은 의사결정 과정에서 주도권을 가지며, 리더기업이라고 불리는 기업이며, 다른 한 유형은 리더의 결정을 따르는 팔로워기업이다. 이러한 관계구조는 파트너십 형성에 영향을 미치게 된다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기업의 주도권과 파트너십, 정보품질, SCM 특징 관계를 설명할 수 있는 연구 모델을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 공급사슬관계를 유지하고 있는 기업을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였으며, 분석에는 총 116부의 설문이 이용되었다. 모형 검증을 위해 본 연구에서는 SPSS 23과 smartPLS 3.2.3을 사용하였다. 연구 결과 첫째, 기업의 협상력은 기업의 영향력, 파트너십, 그리고 정보품질에 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 영향력은 파트너십과 정보품질에 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 파트너십은 정보품질과 SCM의 특징인 공급사슬 유연성, 공급사슬 민첩성, 공급사슬 불확실성 모두에 영향을 미쳤으며, 넷째, 정보품질은 공급사슬 유연성과 민첩성에는 영향을 미쳤다.

키워드

협상력, 영향력, 파트너십, 정보품질, SCM, 유연성, 민첩성, 불확실성 통제, 주도권

참고문헌(43)open

  1. [학술지] 박민숙 / 2011 / 공급사슬 파트너십에서 물류서비스 품질 요소의 중요도 지각 차이 비교 / 경영과 정보연구 30 (2) : 113 ~ 131

  2. [학술지] 이정훈 / 2007 / PLS 경로모형을 이용한 IT 조직의 BSC 성공요인간의 인과관계 분석 / Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems 17 (4) : 207 ~ 228

  3. [학술지] 이재식 / 2009 / 공급사슬관리(SCM)의 핵심성공요인과 추진유형이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향 -균형성과표(BSC)를 활용한 성과측정- / 경영과 정보연구 28 (1) : 45 ~ 69

  4. [학술지] 장활식 / 2014 / 조직 간 파워 유형과 SCM 사용자만족 / 정보시스템연구 23 (2) : 1 ~ 23

  5. [학술지] 최수형 / 2011 / 공급사슬에서의 기업 간 협력이 물류성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 / 경영과 정보연구 30 (4) : 229 ~ 251

  6. [학술지] Benton, W. C / 2005 / The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction / Journal of Operations Management 23 : 1 ~ 22

  7. [학술지] Blome, C. / 2014 / The impact of knowledge transfer and complexity on supply chain flexibility : A knowledge-based vie / International Journal of Production Economics 147 : 307 ~ 316

  8. [학술지] Chen, M. / 2007 / Evaluating the supply chain performance of IT-based inter-enterprise collaboration / Information & Management 44 (6) : 524 ~ 534

  9. [학술지] Chin, W. W. / 1998 / Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling / MIS Quarterly 22 (1) : 7 ~ 16

  10. [단행본] Cohen, J. / 1998 / Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences / Lawrence Erlbaum

  11. [학술지] Crook, T. R. / 2007 / Sources and consequences of bargaining power in supply chains / Journal of Operations Management 25 : 546 ~ 555

  12. [학술지] Dyer, J. / 1996 / Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : evidence from the auto industry / Strategic Management Journal 17 : 271 ~ 291

  13. [학술지] Gallear, D. / 2012 / Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance : An empirical examination / International Journal of Production Economics 140 : 83 ~ 91

  14. [학술지] Geary, S. / 2006 / On bullwhip in supply chains—historical review, present practice and expected future impact / International Journal of Production Economics 101 : 2 ~ 18

  15. [학술지] Gosling, J. / 2010 / Supply chain flexibility as a determinant of supplier selection / International Journal of Production. Economics 128 : 11 ~ 21

  16. [단행본] Hair, J. F. / 2006 / Multivariate Data Analysis / Pearson International Edition

  17. [학술지] Hald, K. S. / 2009 / Towards an understanding of attraction in buyer–supplier relationships / Industrial Marketing Management 38 : 960 ~ 970

  18. [학술지] Harrison, D. / 2004 / Is a long-term business relationship an implied contract? Two views of relationship disengagement / Journal of Management Studies 41 (1) : 107 ~ 125

  19. [학술지] Huang, Z. / 2002 / An Analysis of Manufacturer-Retailer Supply Chain Coordination in Cooperative Advertising / Decision Sciences 33 (3) : 469 ~ 494

  20. [학술지] Huo, B. / 2015 / The effect of IT and relationship commitment on supply chain coordination:A contingency and configuration approach / Information & Management 52 : 728 ~ 740

  21. [학술지] Jean, R. J. B. / 2014 / The impact of technological, organizational and environmental characteristics on electronic collaboration and relationship performance in international customer–supplier relationships / Information & Management 51 : 854 ~ 864

  22. [학술지] Jin, Y. / 2014 / Exploring relationships among IT-enabled sharing capability, supply chain flexibility, and competitive performance / International Journal of Production Economics 153 : 24 ~ 34

  23. [학술지] Kähkönen, A. K. / 2014 / The influence of power position on the depth of collaboration / Supply Chain Management : An International Journal 19 (1) : 17 ~ 30

  24. [학술지] Katayama, H. / 1999 / Agility, adaptability and learnness: A comparison of concepts and a study of practice / International Journal of Production Economics 60 : 43 ~ 51

  25. [학술지] Krishnan, R. / 2006 / When does trust matter to alliance performance / Academy of Management Journal 49 (5) : 894 ~ 917

  26. [학술지] Kwon I. W .G. / 2004 / Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships / The Journal of Supply Chain Management (Spring) : 4 ~ 14

  27. [학술지] Lambert, D. M. / 2000 / Issues in Supply Chain Management / Industrial Marketing Management 29 : 65 ~ 83

  28. [학술대회] Lee, H. L. / 2001 / EBusiness and Supply Chain Integration / Stanford Global Supply Chain Management Forum : 1 ~ 20

  29. [학술지] Lee, J. N / 1999 / The effect of partnership quality on its outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation / Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (4) : 29 ~ 61

  30. [학술지] Lin F / 2002 / Effects of information sharing on supply chain performance in electronic commerce / IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (3) : 258 ~ 268

  31. [단행본] Maskell, B. H. / 1991 / Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing / Productivity Press, Portland, OR

  32. [학술지] Nagarajan, M. / 2008 / A Bargaining Framework in Supply Chains : The Assembly Problem / Management Science 54 (8) : 1482 ~ 1496

  33. [단행본] Organ, D. W. / 1986 / Organization Behavior: An applied psyshological approach / Business Pubilication

  34. [학위논문] Prud’homme, A. M. / 2008 / Business Continuity in the Supply Chain: Planning for Disruptive Events

  35. [학술지] Ryu, I. / 2009 / The role of partnership in supply chain performance / Industrial Management &Data Systems 109 (4) : 496 ~ 514

  36. [보고서] Shanker, V. / 2002 / The Role of Trust in Online Customer Support, Working Paper

  37. [학술지] Swafford, P. M. / 2008 / Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility / International Journal of Production Economics 116 : 288 ~ 297

  38. [학술지] Tenenhaus, M. / 2005 / PLS Path Modeling / Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 48 (1) : 159 ~ 205

  39. [학술지] Wang, E. T. G. / 2006 / A Virtual Integration Theory of Improved Supply-Chain Performance / Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (2) : 41 ~ 64

  40. [학술지] Wong C. W. Y. / 2015 / The performance of contingencies of supply chain information integration : The roles of product and market complexity / International Journal of Production Economics 165 : 1 ~ 11

  41. [학술지] Wu, I. L / 2014 / Information sharing and collaborative behaviors in enabling supply chain performance: A social exchange perspective / International Journal of Production Economics 148 : 122 ~ 132

  42. [학술지] Youn, S. / 2012 / The role of mutual trust in supply chain management : Deriving from attribution theory and transaction cost theory / International Journal of Business Excellence 5 (5) : 575 ~ 597

  43. [학술지] Youn, S. H. / 2014 / Supply chain information capabilities and performance outcomes : An empirical study of Korean steel suppliers / International Journal of Information Management 34 : 369 ~ 380