Introduction

Motivation is increasingly becoming a major area of interest within the field of health professions’ education as it has been suggested to have a pivotal role for students’ academic success and wellbeing and for patients’ outcomes [1]. Amongst the several motivational theories, the self-determination theory (SDT) has gathered special attention in recent years, generating evidence across numerous domains, such as education, health, and psychology [2]. Moreover, several authors have stressed the role of SDT and its implications for health education, suggesting that many of its principles may explain why students thrive in clinical education settings [1,3].

SDT investigates the roles of self-determined and controlled behaviours in different environments, postulating motivation as a multidimensional construct based on three different quality types; in a continuum ranging from the least to the most self-determined forms there is amotivation, controlled motivation, and autonomous motivation [2,4] (Fig. 1). Autonomous and controlled motivation refer to an individual’s intention to act (though leading to different outcomes), conversely amotivation refers to the lack of it. The latter is therefore represented by a non-regulation state that results from an individual not valuing a behaviour or outcome, in other words, what students’ do seems to be unrelated to the consequences derived from their actions.

Following the continuum, controlled motivation refers to pursuing an activity out of a sense of obligation, or as a means to an end. It has been subdivided into two types of regulation that can be ordered along the continuum. The lower self-determined form is external regulation, in which students engage in activities mainly to obtain rewards or to avoid punishment. This is followed by introjected regulation, in which individuals begin to internalize the reasons for their actions; however, behaviour is still regulated by external demands or requirements from the environment to avoid internal conflict, such as shame or guilt [5].

Autonomous motivation refers to engaging out of pleasure and satisfaction and/or by valuing the importance of an activity. It has also been subdivided into two types of regulation, on the one hand there is identified regulation, in which behaviour becomes valued, important and emitted out of choice, and although the locus of causality is somewhat internal it stills represents an instrument to achieve an objective. On the other hand, there is internal regulation, which is usually referred to as intrinsic motivation, being this the most self-determined form of behaviour and denoting the drive to pursue an activity simply for the pleasure or satisfaction derived from it, without internal or external pressures [5]. Intrinsic Motivation has been considered as a global construct with three subdivisions being at the same level and not following a continuum, but categorized as subtypes. Firstly, there is intrinsic motivation to know, which relates to concepts such as curiosity or motivation to learn; secondly, there is intrinsic motivation towards accomplishments, which reflects commitment towards an activity for the pleasure and satisfaction gained when one attempts to accomplish or create something; and finally, there is intrinsic motivation to experience stimulation, which indicates engagement for fun, excitement, and positive sensations.

These concepts are important, as they explain large part of students’ behaviour and lead to significant and varied outcomes. As such, past research has shown that cognitive, behavioural, and affective outcomes become increasingly positive as actions are endorsed following the continuum pattern of motivation, from the lowest to the highest self-determined type [2]. For instance, several studies in higher education have found that internalisation of students’ motivation towards an autonomous form is associated with positive educational outcomes, e.g., deep study strategies, enhanced conceptual learning, and creativity. In contrast, least self-determined forms of motivation, such as controlled motivation and amotivation, have been associated with more negative outcomes, e.g., low competence and poor wellbeing [1].

From the above, the question that arises is how motivation is influenced and what makes a student adopt a certain type of regulation. SDT postulates that motivation is influenced by both intrapersonal and interpersonal factors [5]. Intrapersonal factors refer to an individual’s inherent characteristics (e.g., gender, age, or ethnicity) and to personality traits. On the other hand, interpersonal forces are represented by social factors, in other words, by social experiences in which others have powerful impact on our motivation. Previous studies have highlighted, in educational contexts, the influence of interpersonal factors such as teachers’ autonomy-support, extent of responsibility, selection procedure, and early patient contact [6,7].

In addition, SDT proposes that all individuals have the need to feel autonomous, competent, and related to the surrounding social environment in order to be self-determined in their actions [2]. Therefore, the effects of social factors on motivation are suggested to be indirect. Previous research has reported that social factors are mediated by how they facilitate or prevent an individual’s perception of the three basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and/or relatedness [1]; this facilitation supports and maintenances optimal motivation, leading to positive developmental and psychological outcomes. In contrast, social factors that do not facilitate individual’s perceptions of these needs will yield less optimal forms of motivation, leading to more negative outcomes. In the case of health professions education, the facilitation of self-determined forms of motivation is expected to contribute towards students becoming better practitioners.

Consequently, by studying different determinants and outcomes of motivation, educators may plan and implement interventions that stimulate students to engage in activities in a more self-determined fashion, which in turn may lead to positive outcomes benefiting themselves and their patients. The aim of this study, therefore, was to conduct a systematic review to answer the following questions in the context of health professions education: first, what is the evidence on different intrapersonal and interpersonal determinants of self-determined motivation and how are these associations characterised?; second, is there evidence for the mediating effect of the basic psychological needs satisfaction on the relationship between determinants and self-determined motivation?: and third, what is the evidence on different cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of self-determined motivation and how are these associations characterised?

While Kusurkar et al. [8] conducted a literature review on motivation studies focusing on medical education from a general perspective, a growing body of literature has been developed in health professions’ education explicitly based on SDT. Therefore this review builds on previous research and focuses on determinants and outcomes of motivation in SDT-based research expanding the scope to all health professions and providing detailed evidence synthesis on what the current knowledge is, the identification of gaps, recommendations for future research, and stressing the crucial role that motivation has on the educational decision-making processes of future health professionals.

Methods

The review was conducted during June and September 2015, following the ‘structured approach to the reporting in healthcare education of evidence synthesis statement’ [9]. Ethics approval was obtained from the Medical School of the University of Glasgow, as being part of a larger project (project number: 200140106).

Data collection

The systematic search was conducted in four phases. Firstly, a comprehensive search was conducted throughout the Medline, CINHAL, Embase, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases. Three essential concepts were identified for the search strategy: ‘motivation based on SDT,’ ‘determinants, mediators, and outcomes,’ and ‘health professions education.’ These were expanded considering synonyms, alternative spelling, and related terms. Nevertheless, each database has its own indexed subject headings; therefore we adapted our keyword combination according to each thesaurus. The core search strategy for Medline is presented in Table 1.

Secondly, relevant journals were hand-searched through their printed/online versions, and articles were selected based on the relevance of their titles based on the PRISMA statement [10] (Fig. 2). Thirdly, to account for publication bias, unpublished and grey literature were accessed through the ‘system for information on grey literature in Europe’ (www.opengrey.eu) using the aforementioned set of keywords.

Finally, the publications of experts in the field were reviewed by accessing key authors’ ‘Research Gate’ profiles (www.researchgate.net) and through the publications of the faculty list on the ‘SDT Website’ (www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/faculty). In total, 4,058 article tittles were scoped, corresponding to the profiles of 93 researchers from areas such as general education, psychology, medicine and dentistry. This approach provided a useful way to systematically review SDT-related publications from leading authors and also provided a fast and simple way of contacting them when additional information was required.

To be included in the review, all references were assessed based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria described in Table 2. All retrieved articles were exported to a reference manager for selection procedures. This stage was divided in three phases conducted by two authors independently and moderated by a third author whenever in disagreement. In phase one, duplicates and irrelevant titles were removed. In phase two the abstracts of the remaining articles were reviewed using the inclusion/exclusion criteria. When there was doubt on the exclusion of a particular article, it was advanced to phase three, so it could be assessed based on the full text rather than on the abstract. In phase three, the full text of each article was screened, enabling a final decision. Subsequently, applying the same three phases, an ancestry search of the selected articles’ references was conducted through the Web of Science.

As a mixture of qualitative and quantitative papers were expected to emerge, we opted for the semi-structured quality analysis ‘Questions to ask of research or evaluation evidence,’ published in the first BEME guide [11]. This appraisal instrument is applicable to several methods; it has 17 items responding to a ‘yes/no’ question aimed at analysing the quality of different areas of a research paper.

Data analysis

A meta-analysis of results was not possible due to methodological heterogeneity, therefore we approached the review as a narrative synthesis through a thematic analysis using the Nvivo ver. 10.0 software (QSR International, Doncaster, Australia). A data extraction form was developed including key methodological information, selected findings, and comments relevant to the research question (Table 3). The thematic analysis facilitated the translation of concepts between studies by identifying prominent themes and summarising their findings under recurrent headings, therefore allowing the integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence [12].

The unit of analysis was focused on the identification and establishment of relations between determinants, mediators, and educational outcomes of motivation based on SDT. The thematic analysis was organised in three phases. The first phase was an open coding stage based on constant comparison and mainly aimed at reducing the data, extracting the essential ideas and resulting in the grouping of segments into different categories, i.e., determinants, mediators, and outcomes. The second phase was a central coding stage, aimed at combining and relating different categories amongst each other and grouping them into themes and subthemes. Finally, the third phase was an interpretative stage aimed at drawing conclusions and reflecting on the findings.

Results

Electronic and additional sources identified 2,966 references. When duplicates and irrelevant titles were removed, 385 papers were forwarded for abstract screening and later full-text assessment. Of these, 17 met the eligibility criteria. Subsequently, 570 titles were screened in the ancestry search, from which no new articles were included. Finally, all 17 papers were rated as of good quality evidence and were included in the review. Fig. 2 presents a flow chart summarising the review process.

All selected studies stated clear objectives and were found to be relevant for the study of self-determined motivation in health professions education. Table 3 provides a summary of the key findings. Reports came from different locations, such as North and South America, Australia, Europe, and Asia, thus providing evidence of the topic’s relevance for different health professions education settings. In terms of the specific subjects, the majority of the research has been dedicated to explore motivation in medical education (n=12, 71%), and to a lesser extent in psychology (n=3, 18%), and dental education (n=2, 11%) (Table 3).

Determinants, mediators, and outcomes of self-determined motivation

Fig. 3 shows a summary of the identified variables and their overall relationships with autonomous motivation. Determinants were divided into intrapersonal and interpersonal, and outcomes were divided into cognitive, affective, and behavioural.

Intrapersonal determinants

Age: Inconclusive evidence was reported on the association between age and medical students’ motivation. While a study conducted with American medical students [7] reported that older students exhibited a more autonomous profile, endorsing less impersonal reasons, studies with Japanese and Dutch medical students [13,14] have reported non-significant associations in regression analyses.

Gender: Women have shown a more self-determined profile than men. Five studies [7,14, 15, 16,17] found that gender was significantly associated with autonomous motivation of medical students, and that women and men reported, respectively, higher autonomous motivation and higher controlled motivation. Two studies reported inconclusive findings. Nevertheless, they were limited by their motivation instrument, aimed at secondary school students [13], and by the small effect sizes reported by dental students [18].

Personality traits: Three studies analysed the relationship between personality traits and self-determined motivation. Psychopathological levels of personality (i.e., mental illness) were negatively associated with self-determined motivation in Korean medical students [19], while persistence, self-directedness, cooperativeness, self-transcendence, readiness to start/enter medical school, and willingness of a student to sacrifice for his/her medical study were positively associated with Dutch and Japanese medical students’ autonomous forms of motivation and showed contrary findings for controlled motivation and amotivation [13,20].

Interpersonal determinants

Academic conditions and lifestyle: One study found significant associations between intrinsic motivation and Japanese students’ taking pleasure in learning and in university, attending university and being able to understand lectures. Additionally, in the same study, time spent with family (≥1 hour per day) was found to be a positive predictor of intrinsic motivation [21].

Year of curriculum: Students’ progression throughout the curriculum showed inconclusive associations with motivation. For instance, Chilean dental students’ autonomous and controlled forms of regulation and amotivation showed significant differences per year of study [18]; however, amotivation showed an increasing pattern, with the highest scores corresponding to the fourth year i.e., when students start their clinical and patient-based learning, and decreased from that point until the end of the sixth year. The reverse pattern was reported for intrinsic motivation. Additionally, a study on Dutch medical students reported year of curriculum as a non-significant predictor of autonomous motivation [17].

Qualitative method of selection: Qualitative vs. weighted lottery system of medical students was found to affected relative autonomous motivation [17]. Indeed, students that underwent a qualitative method of selection showed higher autonomous motivation as well as lower amotivation scores than weighted lottery selected students. When integrated into a model, qualitative selected students’ autonomous motivation showed a positive indirect effect on grade point average through good study strategies (β=0.32, P<0.01), which was stronger than the effect reported for weighted lottery selected students (β=0.18, P<0.01). When applying to medical school, both selected and non-selected students’ statement for application showed strong autonomous reasons, therefore its validity and reliability was questioned, as it tends to emphasize socially desirable answers highlighting autonomous reasons and underreporting controlled motivation [22].

Feedback: Dental teachers reported the relevance of providing timely and constructive feedback as a way of supporting students’ intrinsic motivation and encouraging their perception of competence in one-on-one clinical teaching situations [23]. In their experience, feedback had to be given as a dialogue, highlighting the good things and what should be improved, and focusing on the task rather than on the person.

Autonomy supportive learning climate: Four studies informed about the significance of an autonomy supportive learning climate to support students’ autonomous motivation. The autonomy supportiveness of teachers predicted American medical students’ higher autonomous self-regulation towards a 24-week patient-interview course and over a two and one-half-year period [7]. Likewise, but in a different setting, learning in an autonomy supportive climate for a specific subject predicted students’ autonomous motivation to follow a surgery or an internal medicine residency path, even after the effects of prior and actual likelihood for that specialty were removed [24,25]. Dental faculty defined an autonomy supportive climate as a teaching style that supports the transfer of responsibility, refocuses uninteresting activities, identifies and encourages personal interests, and supports proactivity and choice [23].

Mediators

No studies were found to test the mediation effect of students’ perception of the basic psychological needs between determinants and motivation.

Cognitive outcomes

Reflection: As Brazilian medical students’ motivation became more self-determined, the correlation with reflection in learning became stronger [15]. Therefore, as students’ self-determined motivation increased, so did their metacognitive expertise.

Psychosocial beliefs: The biopsychosocial approach to medicine highlights the importance of practitioners being empathic, patient-centred, and sensitive to patients’ psychological and social needs to provide high-quality care. In a 24-week patient-interviewing course, students who mostly engaged out of an autonomous orientation showed stronger psychosocial beliefs at the end of the course (r=0.25) than students who engaged mostly out of controlled orientation (r=-0.14) or expressing an impersonal orientation (r=-0.27). Furthermore, when controlling for gender, an autonomous orientation and an impersonal orientation were found to be significant positive and negative predictors of psychosocial beliefs [7].

Meaning in life: Australian psychology students reported, with the exception of amotivation, all positive and similar associations between autonomous and controlled forms of motivation and presence of meaning in life [26]. In the same study, with the exception of intrinsic motivation to know, all autonomous and controlled motivation variables and amotivation showed positive and significant correlations with search for meaning in life. These results do not follow the theoretical continuum of SDT, and one reason might be due to the association of a contextual variable (academic motivation) with a general variable (meaning in life, as not being meaning in academic life).

Affective outcomes

Academic self-concept: A pattern consistent with SDT was found for dental students’ motivation and academic self-concept [18]. Identified regulation and the three intrinsic motivation subtypes showed the strongest positive and significant correlations (from r=0.18 to 0.24), introjected regulation showed a weaker but still positive and significant association (r=0.10), external regulation score was very weak and non-significant (r=0.05), while amotivation showed a negative and significant correlation (r=-0.15,)

Adaptation to University: Amongst Australian psychology students, intrinsic motivation to know and to experience stimulation were positive and significantly associated with measures of adaptation to university such as academic adjustment and institutional attachment, whereas introjected regulation showed a negative significant correlation with personal adjustment, as well as amotivation that showed a negative significant association with social adjustment and with all the aforementioned variables [26]. Furthermore, similar results were reported for British psychology students’ suggesting that, as students’ self-determination decreases, so does their adaptation to university [27].

Burnout: British psychology students’ autonomous and controlled motivation showed, respectively, significant negative and positive associations with exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy, which characterise the burnout syndrome [28]. These results were mirrored by Dutch medical students’ reports on autonomous/controlled motivation and exhaustion [16].

Depression and anxiety: Amotivation showed a positive and significant correlation with Australian psychology students’ depression (r=0.44) and anxiety levels (r=0.36) [26]. All other motivation types were non-significant, with the exception of introjected regulation, which showed a positive correlation with anxiety (r=0.16). This is of special interest, as students endorsing this type of controlled motivation depend on success and achievements to alleviate internal pressure and avoid feelings of guilt, shame, and self-derogation, explaining the significant levels of anxiety in order to maintain their self-esteem, ego, and sense of pride. In line with these findings, Korean medical students’ self-determined motivation was found to predict lower levels of depression [19].

Harmonious passion: Autonomous motivation of psychology students had a positive and significant correlation with harmonious academic passion (r=0.44), which corresponds when individuals incorporate an activity freely into their self-identity, without incorporating any behavioural contingencies or rewards [28].

Satisfaction with life: Intrinsic motivation to know and amotivation showed significant positive and negative associations respectively with psychology students’ satisfaction with life [26].

Positive and negative emotions: Self-determined motivation has also been associated with positive and negative emotions experienced in university. Increasingly stronger positive correlations from controlled to autonomous forms of motivation and negative correlations of amotivation with positive emotions have been reported by dental students [18]. Similar results were reported for psychology students, who additionally showed a positive association between amotivation and both negative emotions [26] and psychological distress [27].

Stress: Perceived levels of stress towards university were studied to assess the amount of stress students experience during medical school, focusing on areas such as the school curriculum, the educational environment, and personal competence/endurance amongst others. Korean medical and British psychology students’ stress levels towards university showed positive correlations with amotivation, which then turned increasingly negative when correlated with controlled and autonomous motivation [19,27].

Behavioural outcomes

Academic engagement: Psychology students’ vigour, dedication, and absorption, all of which are indicators of academic engagement, showed positive and negative associations with autonomous and controlled motivation, respectively [28].

Enthusiastic attendance to class: When attending a 20-week course on patient interviewing skills, second year medical students endorsing autonomous reasons for studying showed a significant positive correlation with enthusiastic attendance, both on the first and second 10-week block [7].

Intention to continue studies: Self-determined motivation has also been associated with intentions to continue studying medicine, showing a positive and negative correlation with autonomous motivation and amotivation, respectively [15]. The latter was also supported by the fact that the only 3 students who dropped out of the medical programme, while the study took place, showed a high amotivation profile.

Support of patients’ autonomy: Medical students’ autonomous orientation at the end of a patient-interviewing course was positively correlated, six months later, with the autonomy-supportiveness towards standardized patients on cardiovascular risk and smoking cessation counselling [7].

Peer tutoring: Motivational patterns of medical students’ choices of cross-year peer tutoring activity showed autonomous motivation as having a significant positive correlation with number of courses tutored within a four-semester timeframe [15].

Academic performance: For Australian psychology students [26], and for Dutch [16,17], Korean [19], and Brazilian [15] medical students, autonomous motivation was positive and significantly associated with high performance, and as motivation became more controlled, the correlation became weaker and non-significant, which in turn became negative and significant when associated with amotivation. On the other hand, two studies reported inconsistent findings in psychology and dental students [18,27], however authors recommended cautious interpretation of their findings, as these came from cumulative instead of concurrent grade point average.

Learning orientation: Students’ reasons for studying showed significant correlations to the way students approached their learning process. Four studies reported [15, 16, 17, 18] that when medical and dental students’ autonomous forms of motivation increased, so did their deep study strategies and meaning orientation to learning. On the other hand, as controlled forms of motivation increased, deep study strategies decreased and surface study strategies and reproductive orientations to learning increased. This suggests that stronger autonomous motivation goes together with enhanced self-regulation of learning.

Discussion

The study of motivation in health professions education from the SDT perspective has been investigated in different cultural educational settings, however, the health-profession-context in which it has been explored is quite narrow, being mostly dedicated to medical education with few exceptions in psychology and dental education. The latter represents an important challenge for health education researchers, mainly because of the differences between health professions’ education and general education, and amongst the diverse health professions. These being different in several aspects, such as in the intensity of study, the timing and responsibility of patient contact, the requirement to carry out clinical work along with study, and the needs to follow a highly specifically defined path to being able to qualify to practice as a health professional. Indeed, several authors have highlighted the needs to continue expanding this research to other health areas [23,26], and similarly in medicine, authors have claimed that literature exists on students’ motivation to enter medical school yet very little is known about what happens afterwards [15,20].

SDT argues that its principles are independent of the individuals’ origin [2]. This is consistent with the findings from the reviewed articles, in which studies coming from different locations showed similar results. Future investigations should continue expanding cultural aspects such as gender and ethnic differences, as they provide important evidence about the external validity of SDT.

Studying students’ types of motivation should be an important feature for teachers, administrators, and curriculum developers when aiding to identify different determinants that impact students’ self-determination, which in turn may impact on educational outcomes and wellbeing [1]. The findings reported indicate that motivation is predicted by both the educational environment and students’ personal characteristics (Fig. 3). Of these, some can be manipulated and some cannot, implying that motivation can vary depending on its predictors [8].

Regardless of being unlikely to be manipulated, intrapersonal characteristics play an important role in students’ self-determination. Concerning gender, for instance, women appear to have a more autonomous profile than men, which is in line with research on SDT coming from other domains [29]. Indeed, in medical education women have been clustered into an interest-motivated group (i.e., higher autonomous motivation), whereas men have been clustered into a status-motivated profile (i.e., higher controlled motivation) [16]. Therefore, intrapersonal determinants should not be overlooked, as they might provide teachers with different insights on how to mentor or give advice to students [14].

On the other hand, interpersonal determinants were mostly related to the educational environment and represent a group of variables in which great attention should be paid, as they represent the ‘day-by-day’ influences over motivation in which educators may intervene. The learning climate, this being controlling or autonomy supportive, is suggested to influence students’ reasons for engaging in academic activities [1]. The relevance of creating an autonomy supportive learning climate in clinical education has been recently stressed by several authors [1,3,30], in which encouraging self-initiation, volitional activities, the use of constructive feedback, and providing rationale is pointed as crucial. The impact of learning in such environment has been suggested as beneficial for both students and patients, as students engaging in activities based on autonomous reasons are more likely to interact and support their patients’ autonomy towards their healthcare [7]. Moreover, the emerging development of curricula based on entrusted professional activities [31], has common grounds with SDT by highlighting the importance of developing students’ autonomy and competence over time. Since several academic conditions were related to students’ self-determination, these variables may well be used for developing interventions for lowering the incidence of and/or increasing the recovery from low self-determined forms of motivation and prevent future academic failure [6,21]

Despite the inconclusive findings with regards to year of curriculum and motivation, it is interesting to note that motivation fluctuates along the curriculum. This was shown for dental students, in which amotivation reached the highest score in the fourth year (when transitioning from pre-clinical to clinical courses) and then decreasing towards the final sixth year, with the opposite pattern being shown for intrinsic motivation. As such, it seems possible that this is due to the experience students have when transitioning through different learning cycles (i.e., basic sciences and preclinical and clinical activities). It has been suggested that an early patient contact and vertical integration might increase students autonomous motivation and decrease the amotivation when experiencing an abrupt transition [1,18]. However, further research needs to be undertaken before the association between clinical transition and motivation is more clearly understood.

One unanticipated finding was that no study tested the mediating role of students’ basic psychological needs satisfaction between interpersonal determinants and motivation. This mediating effect has been tested with success in other domains [32]. So far, there is useful evidence on how motivation is directly influenced by different determinants; nevertheless there is no evidence showing the effect of mediating variables. As to what impacts motivation is how students perceive these determinants to affect their basic psychological needs and not their original intended effect [2], many questions are still unanswered leaving abundant room for further research.

When students were experiencing autonomous reasons to attend university and for engaging in academic activities, positive cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes were reported. As to how students processed information, cognitive outcomes such as reflection were higher as motivation became more autonomous. Reflection in- and on-action has been related to an increased lifelong learning experience [33] and as students become more autonomous, so might their future self-regulation of learning. Additionally, in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on the technical-biological and pharmacological aspects of healthcare, which is believed to carry a dehumanisation of patient care [7]. Instead, as students’ self-determination increased, so did their psychosocial beliefs towards a more humanistic approach to medical care.

The findings regarding students’ affective outcomes are consistent with data obtained in research with primary and secondary school students and in other areas of higher education, in which autonomous motivation has been related to better psychological adjustment [34]. Moreover, these findings are also in line with those of James et al. [35] who suggested that amotivation is associated with an increased risk of students discontinuing university.

In terms of students’ actions, as motivation orientations became more self-determined, behavioural outcomes became more positive. These findings seem to be consistent with research in other domains of higher education, where autonomous motivation has been related to sustained student involvement and with higher academic performance [36], and where controlled motivation/amotivation was shown to correlate with cheating [37] and plagiarism [38].

In general, students reported a mix of autonomous and controlled reasons for studying, thus supporting the idea that internal and external sources of motivation play an important role in the context of demanding undergraduate programmes. Nevertheless, internal and external reasons are associated with positive and negative outcomes respectively. Therefore, efforts should point at encouraging students to engage in activities out of interest and enjoyment. It is unrealistic, however, to think that students will participate out of intrinsic motivation all the time. This highlights the relevance of fostering the internalisation process of motivation, from external to internal reasons, in which students need clear rationale and autonomy-support to bridge the importance that learning activities will have for their professional practice and to engage from autonomous forms of motivation.

This review has applied robust methods and has led to relevant findings; nevertheless, there are a series of limitations that should be taken into account. First, we limited our analysis to English-, Spanish-, and French-language articles, which might have excluded relevant literature from other languages. Second, we searched the literature through multiple sources, however the review is inherently limited to these and some relevant publications might have been excluded. Third, the findings reported might be somewhat limited by the number of small-sized but still meaningful correlations and should be interpreted within the context of each study. Finally, the downside of bringing together research conducted in different health-related disciplines is that it involves a variety of educational contexts, study designs, and participants, where results found in one context might not be generalised to others. Nonetheless, details have been provided of the methods and results of the included studies, so that readers can judge the transferability of findings to different health professions education settings.

In conclusion, this study has found that generally, motivation could be enhanced by changes in the educational environment and by an early detection of students’ characteristics. Doing so, may support future health practitioners’ self-determined forms of motivation and positively influence how they process information and their emotions and how they approach their learning activities, which may ultimately contribute to the fundamental purpose of health professions education: the improvement of healthcare practice, patient care, and patients outcomes.

Article information

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Supplementary material

Fig. 1.

The self-determination theory continuum of motivation. From Ryan et al. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000;25:54-67, with permission from Elsevier [4].

Fig. 2.

Flow chart summarising the review process with number of articles reviewed and retained at each stage. From Moher et al. PLoS Med 2009;6: e1000097 [10]. ^a)Academic Medicine, Advances in Health Science Education, Educational and Psychological Measurements, Educational Psychology, Education for Health, European Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, Journal of Personality, Medical Education, Medical Teacher, and Motivation and Emotions.

Fig. 3.

Summary of determinants and outcome variables and their relationship with autonomous motivation. (+), overall positive correlation; (-), overall negative correlation; (+/-), inconclusive correlation.

References

• 1. Ten Cate TJ, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59. Med Teach 2011;33:961-973. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435 ArticlePubMed
• 2. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol 2008;49:182-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012801 Article
• 3. Orsini C, Evans P, Jerez O. How to encourage intrinsic motivation in the clinical teaching environment?: a systematic review from the self-determination theory. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2015;12:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.8 ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 4. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000;25:54-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 ArticlePubMed
• 5. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Can Psychol 2008;49:14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 Article
• 6. Hulsman RL, Oort FJ, Michels RP, Casteelen G, Griffioen FM. Effectiveness of selection in medical school admissions: evaluation of the outcomes among freshmen. Med Educ 2007;41:369-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02708.x ArticlePubMed
• 7. Williams GC, Deci EL. Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996;70:767-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767 ArticlePubMed
• 8. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, van Asperen M, Croiset G. Motivation as an independent and a dependent variable in medical education: a review of the literature. Med Teach 2011;33:e242-e262. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.558539 ArticlePubMed
• 9. Gordon M, Gibbs T. STORIES statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis. BMC Med 2014;12:143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0 ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 Article
• 11. Harden RM, Grant J, Buckley G, Hart IR. BEME guide no. 1: best evidence medical education. Med Teach 1999;21:553-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01421599978960 ArticlePubMed
• 12. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 13. Tanaka M, Mizuno K, Fukuda S, Tajima S, Watanabe Y. Personality traits associated with intrinsic academic motivation in medical students. Med Educ 2009;43:384-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03279.x ArticlePubMed
• 14. Kusurkar R, Croiset G, ten Cate O. Implications of gender differences in motivation among medical students. Med Teach 2013;35:173-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.737056 Article
• 15. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students’ learning quests? Med Educ 2004;38:950-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01913.x ArticlePubMed
• 16. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garre F, Ten Cate O. Motivational profiles of medical students: association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-87 ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 17. Kusurkar RA, Ten Cate TJ, Vos CM, Westers P, Croiset G. How motivation affects academic performance: a structural equation modelling analysis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2013;18:57-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3 ArticlePubMedPMC
• 18. Orsini C, Binnie V, Evans P, Ledezma P, Fuentes F, Villegas MJ. Psychometric validation of the academic motivation scale in a dental student sample. J Dent Educ 2015;79:971-981. ArticlePubMed
• 19. Park J, Chung S, An H, Park S, Lee C, Kim SY, Lee JD, Kim KS. A structural model of stress, motivation, and academic performance in medical students. Psychiatry Investig 2012;9:143-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.4306/pi.2012.9.2.143 ArticlePubMedPMC
• 20. Kusurkar R, Croiset G, Kruitwagen C, ten Cate O. Validity evidence for the measurement of the strength of motivation for medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2011;16:183-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9253-4 ArticlePubMedPMC
• 21. Tanaka M, Watanabea Y. Academic and family conditions associated with intrinsic academic motivation in Japanese medical students: a pilot study. Health Educ J 2011;71:358-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0017896911401004 Article
• 22. Wouters A, Bakker AH, van Wijk IJ, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. A qualitative analysis of statements on motivation of applicants for medical school. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-200 ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 23. Orsini C, Evans P, Binnie V, Ledezma P, Fuentes F. Encouraging intrinsic motivation in the clinical setting: teachers’ perspectives from the self-determination theory. Eur J Dent Educ 2016;20:102-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eje.12147 ArticlePubMed
• 24. Williams GC, Saizow R, Ross L, Deci EL. Motivation underlying career choice for internal medicine and surgery. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1705-1713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00103-2 ArticlePubMed
• 25. Williams GC, Wiener MW, Markakis KM, Reeve J, Deci EL. Medical students’ motivation for internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med 1994;9:327-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02599180 ArticlePubMed
• 26. Bailey TH, Phillips LJ. The influence of motivation and adaptation on students’ subjective well-being, meaning in life and academic performance. High Educ Res Dev 2016;35:201-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087474 Article
• 27. Baker SR. Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Curr Psychol 2004;23:189-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-004-1019-9 Article
• 28. Stoeber J, Childs JH, Hayward JA, Feast AR. Passion and motivation for studying: predicting academic engagement and burnout in university students. Educ Psychol 2011;31:513-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.570251 Article
• 29. Vansteenkiste M, Sierens E, Soenens B, Luyckx K, Lens W. Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: the quality of motivation matters. J Educ Psychol 2009;101:671-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015083 Article
• 30. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Ten Cate TJ. Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy-supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Med Teach 2011;33:978-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.599896 ArticlePubMed
• 31. Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H. Curriculum development for the workplace using entrustable professional activities (EPAs): AMEE guide no. 99. Med Teach 2015;37:983-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308 ArticlePubMed
• 32. Chen B, Vansteenkiste M, Beyers W, Boone L, Deci EL, Duriez B, Lens W, Matos L, Mouratidis A. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motiv Emot 2014;39:216-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1 Article
• 33. Kaufman DM, Mann KV. Teaching and learning in medical education: how theory can inform practice. In: Swanwick T, editor. Understanding medical education: evidence, theory and practice. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 16-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch2
• 34. Deci EL, Ryan RM, Williams GC. Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learn Individ Differ 1996;8:165-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8 Article
• 35. James R, Krause KD, Jennings C; Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne. The first-year experience in Australian universities: findings from 1994 to 2009. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne; 2010.
• 36. Vansteenkiste M, Zhou M, Lens W, Soenens B. Experiences of autonomy and control among chinese learners: vitalizing or immobilizing? J Educ Psychol 2005;97:468-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.468 Article
• 37. Davy JA, Kincaid JF, Smith KJ, Trawick MA. An examination of the role of attitudinal characteristics and motivation on the cheating behavior of business students. Ethics Behav 2007;17:281-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519304 Article
• 38. Angell LR. The relationship of impulsiveness, personal efficacy, and academic motivation to college cheating. Coll Stud J 2006;40:118-131.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Goal Contents, State Empathy and Instructional Goals in a Physical Disability Vignette
  Eleni Iosifidou, Panagiotis Varsamis
  Health Communication.2024; 39(4): 717.     CrossRef
• The potential of structured learning diaries for combining the development and assessment of self-regulated learning
  Zahra Zarei Hajiabadi, John Sandars, John Norcini, Roghayeh Gandomkar
  Advances in Health Sciences Education.2024; 29(1): 27.     CrossRef
• Discrimination and dental students: What is the reality in Brazilian institutions?
  Letícia Regina Morello Sartori, Larissa Tavares Henzel, Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Luísa Jardim Corrêa de Oliveira, Vicente de Paulo Aragão Sabóia, Marcos Britto Correa
  European Journal of Dental Education.2024; 28(1): 130.     CrossRef
• A Qualitative Exploration of Pediatric Resident Perceptions of Autonomy in the Era of Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellowship
  Laura Goldstein, Julianna Lau, Hannah Ford, Dorene Balmer, Rebecca Tenney-Soeiro
  Academic Pediatrics.2024; 24(1): 162.     CrossRef
• Twelve tips for creating a longitudinal quality improvement and safety education for early health professions students
  S. Anthony Sara, Anna Schwarz, Michelle I. Knopp, Eric J. Warm
  Medical Teacher.2024; 46(3): 330.     CrossRef
• Educators’ consideration of learner motivation in ophthalmology education in medical school: Influences on teaching practice and course design
  Deepaysh D. C. S. Dutt, Sandra E. Carr, Tabitha M. Scott, Constantinos Petsoglou, John Grigg, Hessom Razavi
  Medical Teacher.2024; 46(3): 387.     CrossRef
• Structural Equation Modeling: Effects of Master Adaptive Learner and Clinical Learning Environment Attributes on Career Satisfaction and Intention to Stay
  Raine Osborne, Chloe Bailey, Daniel Dinsmore, Emily Lyter, Judy Burnfield, Holly Medearis, Amanda Roura
  Physical Therapy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Why Do We Feel Like Intellectual Frauds? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on the Impostor Phenomenon in Medical Students
  Adam Neufeld, Oksana Babenko, Hollis Lai, Clark Svrcek, Greg Malin
  Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2023; 35(2): 180.     CrossRef
• Nurses’ motivations and desired learning outcomes of postgraduate critical care studies: A descriptive exploratory study
  Elizabeth Oldland, Bernice Redley, Mari Botti, Alison M Hutchinson
  Australian Critical Care.2023; 36(4): 586.     CrossRef
• Examination of Motivational Influences on Clinical-Year Veterinary Students’ Career Decisions
  Shane D. Lyon, Erik H. Hofmeister, Katie E. McCool, Stephanie L. Shaver, Kathryn A. Diehl, Andrew D. Woolcock
  Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.2023; 50(6): 694.     CrossRef
• Job shadowing for early undergraduate dental students: Evaluation and validation of educational effectiveness using structural equation modelling
  Susumu Abe, Yoshizo Matsuka, Ayu Murakami, Omar Marianito Maningo Rodis, Kenji Oka, Toshinori Okawa, Chie Wada‐Mihara, Chihiro Shinohara, Fumiaki Kawano
  European Journal of Dental Education.2023; 27(4): 898.     CrossRef
• Developing low-achieving medical students’ self-regulated learning using a combined learning diary and explicit training intervention
  Zahra Zarei Hajiabadi, Roghayeh Gandomkar, Amir Ali Sohrabpour, John Sandars
  Medical Teacher.2023; 45(5): 475.     CrossRef
• Professional Identity and Motivation for Medical School in First-Year Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study
  Valentina Faihs, Susanne Heininger, Stuart McLennan, Martin Gartmeier, Pascal O. Berberat, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
  Medical Science Educator.2023; 33(2): 431.     CrossRef
• Open Distance Learning in Medical Education: Does It Improve Students’ Motivation?
  Jun Xin Lee, Ahmad Hathim Ahmad Azman, Jing Yi Ng, Noor Akmal Shareela Ismail
  SAGE Open.2023; 13(1): 215824402311576.     CrossRef
• The impact of preparatory activities on the largest clinical aptitude test for prospective medical students in Germany
  Daniel Weppert, Dorothee Amelung, Malvin Escher, Leander Troll, Martina Kadmon, Lena Listunova, Jana Montasser
  Frontiers in Education.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Applying TEC-VARIETY to Motivate and Engage Learners for Online Learning Success
  Weichao Chen, Curtis J. Bonk, John Sandars
  Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions.2023; 43(4): 261.     CrossRef
• Examining the Motivational Climate and Student Effort in Professional Competency Courses: Suggestions for Improvement
  Meghan K. Byrnes, Brett D. Jones, Emily M. Holt Foerst
  Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• How Do Postgraduate Trainees Prepare for New Clinical Learning Environments?
  Kimberly A. Gifford, Kelly A. Kieffer, Eunjung Choi
  Journal of Graduate Medical Education.2023; 15(2): 252.     CrossRef
• Nonlinear Pedagogy Effect and Value of the City and New Technologies as a Didactic Resource in the Training of Future Teachers
  Salvador Pérez-Muñoz, Amparo Casado Melo, Santiago Huete García, Alberto Rodríguez-Cayetano
  Education Sciences.2023; 13(7): 672.     CrossRef
• Dental students’ perceptions and educational impact of preclinical interactive videos compared and in combination with live demonstrations
  Jorge A. Tricio, Daniela P. Vicuña, Félix P. Vicuña, Jaime E. Aravena, Claudia A. Naranjo, César A. Orsini
  Journal of Dental Education.2023; 87(10): 1449.     CrossRef
• Attitudes of Anesthesiology Postgraduate Residents Toward the Influential Factors in Their Success in the Iranian National Board Exam
  Soleiman Ahmady, Zohreh Khoshgoftar, Ali Dabbagh
  Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• How Can Curricular Elements Affect the Motivation to Study?
  Catherine Bopp, Aline Salzmann, Silke Ohlmeier, Melanie Caspar, Erik Schmok, Sara Volz-Willems, Johannes Jäger, Fabian Dupont
  International Medical Education.2023; 2(3): 151.     CrossRef
• Effectiveness and learning experience from undergraduate nursing students in surgical nursing skills course: a quasi- experimental study about blended learning
  Yan Ran Li, Zong Hao Zhang, Wen Li, Pan Wang, Shu Wen Li, Dan Su, Ting Zhang
  BMC Nursing.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Medical student motivation in specialised contexts
  Stacey M. Frumm, Sam Brondfield
  The Clinical Teacher.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Autonomy and developing physicians: Reimagining supervision using self‐determination theory
  Adam P. Sawatsky, Bridget C. O’Brien, Frederic W. Hafferty
  Medical Education.2022; 56(1): 56.     CrossRef
• Pre‐Clinical Medical Students' Use of Motivational and Cognitive Study Strategies During Anatomy Learning: A Three‐Year Cross‐Sectional Survey
  Prince L.M. Zilundu, Fidelis Chibhabha, Guangyin Yu, Rao Fu, Li‐Hua Zhou
  Anatomical Sciences Education.2022; 15(3): 522.     CrossRef
• The Integration of Prelaboratory Assignments within Neuroanatomy Augment Academic Performance, Increase Engagement, and Enhance Intrinsic Motivation in Students
  Venugopala Rao Bhagavathula, Viswakanth Bhagavathula, Rohan S. Moinis, Joydeep Dutta Chaudhuri
  Anatomical Sciences Education.2022; 15(3): 576.     CrossRef
• Need Fulfillment and Resilience Mediate the Relationship between Mindfulness and Coping in Medical Students
  Adam Neufeld, Greg Malin
  Teaching and Learning in Medicine.2022; 34(1): 78.     CrossRef
• Online or Blended Learning: the COVID-19 Pandemic and First-Year Medical Students’ Academic Motivation
  Aidos K. Bolatov, Anar M. Gabbasova, Raushan K. Baikanova, Bahyt B. Igenbayeva, Dainius Pavalkis
  Medical Science Educator.2022; 32(1): 221.     CrossRef
• Rethinking Health Professionals’ Motivation to Do Research: A Systematic Review
  Louisa M D'Arrietta, Venkat N Vangaveti, Melissa J Crowe, Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
  Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2022; Volume 15: 185.     CrossRef
• Background factors associated with academic motivation for attending medical school immediately after admission in Japan: A single‐center study
  Takashi Watari, Nobuhiro Nagai, Kaori Kono, Kazumichi Onigata
  Journal of General and Family Medicine.2022; 23(3): 164.     CrossRef
• Mental health and self-determination profiles of the diverse population of medical students in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic
  Jessica Grace Cockburn, Chee Yang Tan, Dawn Celine Siaw Chern Poh, Ding Jun Tan, Chan Choong Foong, Wei-Han Hong
  BMC Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• What characterize high and low achieving teams in Interprofessional education: A self-determination theory perspective
  Fraide A. Ganotice, Linda Chan, Amy Yin Man Chow, Ui Soon Khoo, May Pui San Lam, Rebecca Ka Wai Liu, Rebecca Po Wah Poon, Michael Ning Wang, Francis Hang Sang Tsoi, George L. Tipoe
  Nurse Education Today.2022; 112: 105321.     CrossRef
• Motivations, barriers, and professional engagement: a multisite qualitative study of internal medicine faculty’s experiences learning and teaching point-of-care ultrasound
  Christopher J. Smith, Keith Barron, Ronald J. Shope, Elizabeth Beam, Kevin Piro
  BMC Medical Education.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Competence is Essential but not Sufficient
  Oksana Babenko, Ann Lee
  Medical Science Educator.2022; 32(2): 295.     CrossRef
• Deciphering Learning Motivation in Open Distance Learning towards Sustainable Medical Education
  Jun Xin Lee, Ahmad Hathim Ahmad Azman, Jing Yi Ng, Noor Akmal Shareela Ismail
  Sustainability.2022; 14(8): 4497.     CrossRef
• Undergraduate veterinary nursing education: A virtual active learning module integrating knowledge and skills
  Julianne Stout, Jennifer Smith
  Education in the Health Professions.2022; 5(1): 22.     CrossRef
• TEST DE CONDICIÓN FÍSICA: MODELO TRADICIONAL VERSUS MODELO DE EDUCACIÓN DEPORTIVA
  A. Carriedo, J. Fernández-Río, A. Méndez-Giménez, J.A. Cecchini
  Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte.2022; 22(86): 269.     CrossRef
• Nursing Students’ Perceived Learning Outcomes, Motivation to Learn and Grade Achieved in a Digital Blended Learning Course: A Norwegian Cross-Sectional Study
  Christine Tørris, Mona Elisabeth Meyer, Ida Hellum Sandbekken, Hedvig Halvorsrud, Marianne Molin
  Education Sciences.2022; 12(7): 467.     CrossRef
• Motivating Learning Through Digital Apps: The Importance of Relatedness Satisfaction
  Francisco Molina, Maria D. Molina, Carlos Molina
  International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction.2022; : 1.     CrossRef
• Consumerist views of higher education and links to student wellbeing and achievement: an analysis based on the concept of autonomy as depicted in self-determination theory
  Karen V. A. Morris
  Journal of Further and Higher Education.2022; 46(6): 836.     CrossRef
• Ambiguity and uncertainty tolerance and psychological needs of medical students: A cross‐sectional survey
  Oksana Babenko, Ann Lee
  The Clinical Teacher.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Comparison of Academic Motivation between Business and Healthcare Students in Online Learning: A Concurrent Nested Mixed-Method Study
  Yasuhiro Kotera, Valentina Gorchakova, Sarah Maybury, Ann-Marie Edwards, Hiromasa Kotera
  Healthcare.2022; 10(8): 1580.     CrossRef
• Motivation, satisfaction, and future career intentions of pharmacy students: A cross-sectional preliminary analysis
  Samar Younes, Dalal Hammoudi Halat, Mohamad Rahal, Mohamed Hendaus, Nisreen Mourad
  Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning.2022; 14(11): 1365.     CrossRef
• Impact of Research Training on Newly Graduated Health Professionals’ Motivation to Undertake Research
  Louisa M D’Arrietta, Venkat N Vangaveti, Melissa J Crowe, Bunmi S Malau-Aduli
  Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2022; Volume 15: 2223.     CrossRef
• Millennials Medical Students Generation at the Crosswalks: Motivations and Attitudes Towards Study and Future Career – A Mixed-Method Study
  Adrian Gillissen, Tonja Kochanek, Michaela Zupanic, Jan P Ehlers
  Advances in Medical Education and Practice.2022; Volume 13: 1305.     CrossRef
• Online Unproctored Clinical Examinations: The Perceptions and Performance of Final Year Dental Students
  Laura Gartshore, Mark Jellicoe, Joanne Bowles, Girvan Burnside, Luke J. Dawson, Vince Bissell
  Dentistry Journal.2022; 10(11): 200.     CrossRef
• Sustainable Engaged Accountable Learners
  Michael A. Gisondi, Jeremy Branzetti, Laura R. Hopson, Linda Regan, Wendy C. Coates
  AEM Education and Training.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Gender differences in dentistry: A qualitative study on students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for entering dentistry at higher education
  Jens Laurs Brøndum Kærsgaard, Mette Krogh Christensen, Pernille Yde Søndergaard, Johanna Naukkarinen
  European Journal of Dental Education.2021; 25(3): 495.     CrossRef
• Autonomous motivation explains interprofessional education outcomes
  Fraide A. Ganotice, Harinder Gill, John Tai Chun Fung, Janet K. T. Wong, George L. Tipoe
  Medical Education.2021; 55(6): 701.     CrossRef
• Fostering student motivation towards community healthcare: a qualitative study
  Shinsuke Yahata, Taro Takeshima, Tsuneaki Kenzaka, Masanobu Okayama
  BMJ Open.2021; 11(1): e039344.     CrossRef
• Students’ learning environment perception and the transition to clinical training in dentistry
  Carlos M. Serrano, Maxim D. Lagerweij, Ilse R. de Boer, Dirk R. Bakker, Pepijn Koopman, Paul R. Wesselink, Johanna M. Vervoorn
  European Journal of Dental Education.2021; 25(4): 829.     CrossRef
• Motivation: An Integral Component of Resident Well-Being
  Amber Deptola
  Journal of Graduate Medical Education.2021; 13(1): 11.     CrossRef
• Which conditions facilitate the effectiveness of large-group learning activities? A systematic review of research in higher education
  Oscar Jerez, Cesar Orsini, Catalina Ortiz, Beatriz Hasbun
  Learning: Research and Practice.2021; 7(2): 147.     CrossRef
• Effects of an Autonomy Support Intervention on the Involvement of Higher Education Students
  José Eduardo Lozano-Jiménez, Elisa Huéscar, Juan Antonio Moreno-Murcia
  Sustainability.2021; 13(9): 5006.     CrossRef
• Mental Health Crisis and Stress Coping among Healthcare College Students Momentarily Displaced from Their Campus Community Because of COVID-19 Restrictions in Japan
  Masatoshi Tahara, Yuki Mashizume, Kayoko Takahashi
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(14): 7245.     CrossRef
• A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Developmental Trajectory of Autonomous Motivation in Graduate Medical Learners
  Susan E. Hansen, Nicole Defenbaugh, Susan Snyder Mathieu, Linda Contillo Garufi, Julie A. Dostal
  Medical Science Educator.2021; 31(6): 2017.     CrossRef
• Procedural skill maintenance: Perspectives and motivations of pediatric emergency medicine faculty
  Margaret Lin‐Martore, Shruti Kant, Bridget C. O’Brien
  AEM Education and Training.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Task shifting of intravitreal injections from physicians to nurses: a qualitative study
  Stine Bolme, Dordi Austeng, Kari Hanne Gjeilo
  BMC Health Services Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Moral Judgement along the Academic Training
  Giulia D’Aurizio, Fabrizio Santoboni, Francesca Pistoia, Laura Mandolesi, Giuseppe Curcio
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 19(1): 10.     CrossRef
• Impact de l’apprentissage systémique sur la motivation à apprendre des étudiants dans un contexte d’apprentissage en milieu clinique
  Sonia Soussi, Abdelmajid Naceur, Dominique Berger, Atf Ghérissi, Amina Belgacem, Ihsen Zairi
  Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Stimulating Intrinsic Motivation in Millennial Students: A New Generation, a New Approach
  Joydeep Dutta Chaudhuri
  Anatomical Sciences Education.2020; 13(2): 250.     CrossRef
• Trainee‐environment interactions that stimulate motivation: A rich pictures study
  Wieke E. van der Goot, Sayra M. Cristancho, Marco Antonio de Carvalho Filho, A. Debbie C. Jaarsma, Esther Helmich
  Medical Education.2020; 54(3): 242.     CrossRef
• How medical students’ perceptions of instructor autonomy-support mediate their motivation and psychological well-being
  Adam Neufeld, Greg Malin
  Medical Teacher.2020; 42(6): 650.     CrossRef
• The role of teachers’ motivation and mindsets in predicting a (de)motivating teaching style in higher education: a circumplex approach
  Branko Vermote, Nathalie Aelterman, Wim Beyers, Leen Aper, Fanny Buysschaert, Maarten Vansteenkiste
  Motivation and Emotion.2020; 44(2): 270.     CrossRef
• A Blended Learning System to Improve Motivation, Mood State, and Satisfaction in Undergraduate Students: Randomized Controlled Trial
  Mario Lozano-Lozano, Carolina Fernández-Lao, Irene Cantarero-Villanueva, Ignacio Noguerol, Francisco Álvarez-Salvago, Mayra Cruz-Fernández, Manuel Arroyo-Morales, Noelia Galiano-Castillo
  Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(5): e17101.     CrossRef
• Sense of belonging predicts persistence intentions among diverse dental education students: A multi‐institutional investigation
  Terrell L. Strayhorn
  Journal of Dental Education.2020; 84(10): 1136.     CrossRef
• Forecasting Interest in Health Professions Education Based on Relative Search Volume Trends From the Philippines
  Junhel Dalanon, Yoshizo Matsuka
  Health Professions Education.2020; 6(3): 368.     CrossRef
• Exploring teachers’ motivation to teach: A multisite study on the associations with the work climate, students’ motivation, and teaching approaches
  Cesar A. Orsini, Jorge A. Tricio, Cristina Segura, Doris Tapia
  Journal of Dental Education.2020; 84(4): 429.     CrossRef
• Motivation of classroom attendance students for the use of digital technologies in online courses
  Fernanda Regina Antunes, Alfredo Almeida Pina-Oliveira, Maíra Rosa Apostolico, Ana Cláudia Giesbrecht Puggina
  Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Examining Gender Differences, Personality Traits, Academic Performance, and Motivation in Ukrainian and Polish Students of Physical Education: A Cross-Cultural Study
  Cezary Kuśnierz, Aleksandra M. Rogowska, Iuliia Pavlova
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(16): 5729.     CrossRef
• Basic psychological needs, more than mindfulness and resilience, relate to medical student stress: A case for shifting the focus of wellness curricula
  Adam Neufeld, Annik Mossière, Greg Malin
  Medical Teacher.2020; 42(12): 1401.     CrossRef
• Science Amotivation Scale: Validity and Reliability Study
  Büşra KARACA, Solmaz AYDIN
  Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
• A systematic review of pharmacy health coaching and an evaluation of patient outcomes
  Harjit K. Singh, Gerard A. Kennedy, Ieva Stupans
  Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy.2019; 15(3): 244.     CrossRef
• Evaluation of a shared decision making educational program: The Ottawa Decision Support Tutorial
  Laura Boland, France Légaré, Meg Carley, Ian D. Graham, Annette M. O’Connor, Margaret L. Lawson, Dawn Stacey
  Patient Education and Counseling.2019; 102(2): 324.     CrossRef
• Factors influencing to study medicine: a survey of first-year medical students from India
  Muthuraman Narayanasamy, Anand Ruban, Prakash Somi Sankaran
  Korean Journal of Medical Education.2019; 31(1): 61.     CrossRef
• Trainee perception of cognitive load during observed faculty staff teaching of procedural skills
  Justin L Sewell, John Q Young, Christy K Boscardin, Olle ten Cate, Patricia S O'Sullivan
  Medical Education.2019; 53(9): 925.     CrossRef
• Exploring the relationship between medical student basic psychological need satisfaction, resilience, and well-being: a quantitative study
  Adam Neufeld, Greg Malin
  BMC Medical Education.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
• How dental students’ course experiences and satisfaction of their basic psychological needs influence passion for studying in Chile
  Cesar Orsini, Jorge Tricio, Doris Tapia, Cristina Segura
  Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2019; 16: 37.     CrossRef
• Motivação Intrínseca do Estudante de Medicina de uma Faculdade com Metodologia Ativa no Brasil: Estudo Transversal
  Pedro Tadeu Álvares Costa Caminha de Azevedo, Maria de Fátima Costa Caminha, Camyla Rolim Souto de Andrade, Carolina Gonçalves de Godoy, Raissa Lyra Sales Monteiro, Ana Rodrigues Falbo
  Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica.2019; 43(1 suppl 1): 12.     CrossRef
• Intrinsic Motivation of Medical Students from a College with Active Methodology in Brazil: a Cross-Sectional Study
  Pedro Tadeu Álvares Costa Caminha de Azevedo, Maria de Fátima Costa Caminha, Camyla Rolim Souto de Andrade, Carolina Gonçalves de Godoy, Raissa Lyra Sales Monteiro, Ana Rodrigues Falbo
  Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica.2019; 43(1 suppl 1): 12.     CrossRef
• Learning climate and feedback as predictors of dental students' self‐determined motivation: The mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction
  C. Orsini, V. Binnie, S. Wilson, M. J. Villegas
  European Journal of Dental Education.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Renovating dental education: A public health issue
  S. Tubert‐Jeannin, D. Jourdan
  European Journal of Dental Education.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
• An Analysis of the Relationship between the Learning Process and Learning Motivation Profiles of Japanese Pharmacy Students Using Structural Equation Modeling
  Shigeo Yamamura, Rieko Takehira
  Pharmacy.2018; 6(2): 35.     CrossRef
• Motivational profiles and their relationships with basic psychological needs, academic performance, study strategies, self-esteem, and vitality in dental students in Chile
  Cesar A. Orsini, Vivian I. Binnie, Jorge A. Tricio
  Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2018; 15: 11.     CrossRef
• Factors associated with motivation in medical education: a path analysis
  Natchaya Kunanitthaworn, Tinakon Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Salilthip Paiboonsithiwong, Natchaphon Songtrijuck, Pimolpun Kuntawong, Danny Wedding
  BMC Medical Education.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Effects of simulation education on oral care practices – a randomized controlled trial
  Miia M. Jansson, Hannu P. Syrjälä, Pasi P. Ohtonen, Merja H. Meriläinen, Helvi A. Kyngäs, Tero I. Ala‐Kokko
  Nursing in Critical Care.2017; 22(3): 161.     CrossRef
• Effect of practical training on the learning motivation profile of Japanese pharmacy students using structural equation modeling
  Shigeo Yamamura, Rieko Takehira
  Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.2017; 14: 2.     CrossRef
• Medical students’ and patients’ perceptions of patient-centred attitude
  Yera Hur, A Ra Cho, Chang Jin Choi
  Korean Journal of Medical Education.2017; 29(1): 33.     CrossRef
• Closing the gap between business undergraduate education and the organisational environment: A Chilean case study applying experiential learning theory
  Leslier Valenzuela, Oscar M. Jerez, Beatriz A. Hasbún, Verónica Pizarro, Gabriela Valenzuela, César A. Orsini
  Innovations in Education and Teaching International.2017; : 1.     CrossRef
• Effect of the Extended Inverted Classroom on clinical simulation for the resuscitation of trauma patients: Pilot study of student perceptions of learning
  Luis Carlos Domínguez, Diego Sierra, Juan José Pepín, Gonzalo Moros, Angélica Villarraga
  Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 45: 4.     CrossRef
• Efecto del Aula Invertida Extendida a simulación clínica para la resucitación del paciente traumatizado: estudio piloto de las percepciones estudiantiles sobre el aprendizaje
  Luis Carlos Domínguez, Diego Sierra, Juan José Pepín, Gonzalo Moros, Angélica Villarraga
  Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología.2017; 45: 4.     CrossRef
• Effect of the Extended Inverted Classroom on clinical simulation for the resuscitation of trauma patients: Pilot study of student perceptions of learning☆
  Luis Carlos Domínguez, Diego Sierra, Juan José Pepín, Gonzalo Moros, Angélica Villarraga
  Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.2017; 45: 4.     CrossRef
• Climate Study of the Learning Environment for Faculty, Staff, and Students at a U.S. Dental School: Foundation for Culture Change
  C.A. Murdoch-Kinch, R.E. Duff, V. Ramaswamy, T.V. Ester, S.A. Sponseller, J.A. Seeley
  Journal of Dental Education.2017; 81(10): 1153.     CrossRef
• Scholarly Conversations in Medical Education
  Bridget C. O’Brien, Win May, Tanya Horsley
  Academic Medicine.2016; 91(11): S1.     CrossRef