Immunosuppression Induced by Glutamine Deprivation Occurs via Activating PD-L1 Transcription in Bladder Cancer
Liping Wang1† 
Ting Xu2† Xuecheng Yang3† Zhijuan Liang1 
Jisheng Zhang4 Dan Li1 Yuanbin Chen1 
Guofeng Ma3 
Yonghua Wang1,3 
Ye Liang1* Haitao Niu1,3*- 1Key Laboratory, Department of Urology and Andrology, Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- 2Department of Geratology, The 971th Hospital of PLA Navy, Qingdao, China
- 3Department of Urology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
- 4Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Key Laboratory, Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
Few studies have reported whether nutrients in the tumor microenvironment can regulate the expression of PD-L1. Since tumor cells are often situated in a low-glutamine environment, we investigated PD-L1 expression under glutamine deprivation in bladder cancer cells. PD-L1 expression and the activation of the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway under glutamine deprivation were investigated by qPCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence analyses. C-Jun-mediated transcriptional regulation of the PD-L1 gene was assessed by ChIP. PD-L1 expression and activation of the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway were assessed in T24 cells, TCCSUP cells and BALB/c mice with or without glutamine supplementation. Additionally, the impact of PD-L1 expression under glutamine deprivation on the function of T cells was investigated by ELISA. The expression of PD-L1 and EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway activation were elevated by glutamine deprivation, and c-Jun was enriched in the enhancer region of PD-L1. The expression of PD-L1 was considerably impaired by inhibiting the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway and was elevated by activating this signaling pathway. In addition, the elevated PD-L1 expression and MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway activation were reduced by glutamine supplementation in vitro and in vivo. PD-L1 upregulation by glutamine deprivation in bladder cancer cells could reduce IFN-γ production by T cells. The expression of PD-L1 was upregulated under glutamine deprivation through the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway to impair T cell function.
Introduction
Carcinoma of the urinary bladder has become a common cancer globally, and the treatments include surgery, chemotherapy and immunotherapy (Bellmunt et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2021). Suppression of checkpoint proteins has become the focus of modern immunotherapy (Bidnur et al., 2016). The most attentive checkpoint targets in bladder cancer treatments are programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) (Sundararajan and Vogelzang 2015; van Hooren et al., 2017). Among them, PD-L1 has been shown to correlate with the severity and outcome of bladder cancer. It has been reported that PD-L1 overexpression is significantly associated with tumor grade and the postoperative prognosis of human urothelial cancers (Nakanishi et al., 2007; Boorjian et al., 2008), and PD-L1 can inhibit the function of T cells, such as inhibiting cytokine production, inducing cell apoptosis, and reducing T cell cytotoxicity (Dong et al., 2002; Iwai et al., 2002). However, most studies on PD-L1 have focused on clinical therapy in bladder cancer, and the regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 overexpression need to be fully investigated.
It would be helpful to improve anti-PD-L1 treatments if the regulatory mechanism of PD-L1 expression in the tumor environment was fully understood. Studies have shown that various mechanisms can regulate the expression of PD-L1 (Boussiotis 2016). First, PD-L1 expression can be controlled by oncogenic pathways (Chen et al., 2016). The activation of EGFR can upregulate the expression of PD-L1 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Akbay et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015). PD-L1 expression can also be activated by the MAPK and PI3K-Akt pathways (Jiang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015). Many transcription factors have been reported to be involved in driving PD-L1 expression, such as HIF-1 and STAT3 (Marzec et al., 2008; Noman et al., 2014). The negative regulation of PD-L1 in cancer cells occurs by epigenetic mechanisms through microRNAs, including miR-197, miR-200, miR-513, miR-570 and miR-34a (Chen et al., 2016). In addition, the expression of PD-L1 is also regulated by proinflammatory cytokines in the tumor microenvironment, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), type I and type II interferons, and VEGF, among which interferon-γ is the most potent (Boussiotis 2016). However, few studies have reported whether changes in nutrient metabolism can drive PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment.
Glutamine is one of the essential nutrients for cancer cell survival and proliferation. The dependence of tumor cells on glutamine metabolism makes it a potential anticancer target. Recent studies demonstrated that inhibitors of glutamine metabolism, expected to be an adjuvant to immunotherapy, can inhibit tumor progression through metabolism suppression and specific immunopotentiation, such as enhancing the immune function of CD8 + T cells in colon cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Leone et al., 2019; Sharma et al., 2020). Glutamine also plays an important role in the development stage of bladder cancer. It has been reported that increased SLC1A5 (a glutamine transporter) expression and glutamine addiction occurr in long-term arsenite-induced human uroepithelial cells to study their malignant transformation (Li et al., 2021). Because of the poor vascularization at tumor sites and excessive consumption by tumor cells, glutamine is often deficient in the tumor microenvironment (Tran et al., 2017). The levels of glutamine have been reported to be lower in numerous tumors, including hepatomas and squamous cell carcinoma, than in normal tissues (Roberts and Frankel 1949). Thus, to grow and survive in conditions lacking glutamine, tumors have to develop various strategies (Reid et al., 2013; Tran et al., 2017; Ishak Gabra et al., 2018). To investigate whether glutamine deprivation affects PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer cells, glutamine was deprived from the culture medium of two highly malignant bladder cancer cell lines (T24 and TCCSUP cells) to detect PD-L1 expression and the signaling pathway involved in this event. Furthermore, we supplemented glutamine into in vivo xenografts of BALB/c mice and then measured changes in PD-L1 expression and activation of the associated signaling pathway. The effect on the function of T cells was also investigated.
Results
PD-L1 upregulation Was Induced by Glutamine Deprivation
After T24 and TCCSUP cells were cultured in low-glutamine or glutamine-free culture medium (50, 25, 0 mg/L; control: 300 mg/L), the mRNA and protein levels of PD-L1 were determined by qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. The mRNA levels of PD-L1 in low-glutamine and glutamine-free medium were significantly higher than those in normal medium (Figures 1A,C), and the change in protein levels was consistent with that in the mRNA levels (Figures 1B,D). Furthermore, we investigated the mRNA levels of PD-L1 after glutamine deprivation at different time points. The qPCR results showed that the highest upregulation of PD-L1 by glutamine deprivation in T24 cells was at 24 h, and the PD-L1 upregulation at 48 h was slightly lower than that at 24 h (Figure 1E). The protein levels of PD-L1 were elevated from 9 to 48 h in T24 cells (Figure 1G). The mRNA and protein level of PD-L1 were significantly upregulated after glutamine deprivation for 15 h in TCCSUP cells, and the high expression was decreased at 48 and 72 h, especially at 72 h (Figures 1F,H). This result indicates that the expression of PD-L1 can be upregulated under glutamine deprivation. The immunofluorescence results in T24 cells also confirmed that the expression of PD-L1 could be induced by glutamine deprivation (Supplementary Figures S1A,B). These results were confirmed in two other bladder cancer cell lines, 5,637 and UMUC-3, and the expression of PD-L1 was also upregulated by glutamine deprivation (Supplementary Figure S2).
FIGURE 1. The expression of PD-L1 is upregulated by glutamine deprivation in T24 and TCCSUP cells. (A,B) The mRNA and protein levels of PD-L1 in T24 cells cultured in low-glutamine and glutamine-free medium (Gln 50, 25, 0: 50, 25, 0 mg/L glutamine; Control: 300 mg/L glutamine). (C,D) The levels of mRNA and protein for PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells cultured in low-glutamine and glutamine-free medium. (E,G) The mRNA and protein levels of PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 3–48 h (F,H) The mRNA and protein levels of PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 3–72 h. The densitometric analysis of proteins was performed and the results were normalized to GAPDH. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Upregulation of PD-L1 Induced by Glutamine Deprivation Through Activating the EGFR/MEK/ERK/C-Jun Signaling Pathway
To investigate whether PD-L1 upregulation induced by glutamine deprivation was mediated through activation of the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway in T24 and TCCSUP cells, the protein expression of pEGFR, pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun after culturing in glutamine-free medium for different durations was determined by Western blot analysis. The expression of pEGFR was elevated at 2 and 4 h (Figure 2A), and the protein levels of pMEK and pERK in T24 cells were increased from 3 to 48 h, and pc-Jun was upregulated from 9 to 24 h (Figure 2C). The immunofluorescence results also confirmed that pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun levels could be increased by glutamine deprivation (Supplementary Figures S1C–H). The expression of pEGFR in TCCSUP cells was elevated at 1 h (Figure 2B). The levels of pMEK and pERK were upregulated from 6 to 15 h and pc-Jun was upregulated from 15 to 24 h (Figure 2D).
FIGURE 2. The protein levels of the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway by glutamine deprivation. (A) The protein level of pEGFR in T24 cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 2–24 h (+: glutamine 300 mg/L; -: glutamine 0 mg/L). (B) The protein level of pEGFR in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 1–24 h. (C) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun in T24 cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 3–48 h. (D) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium for 3–24 h. (E) The binding region of the AP-1 component c-Jun to the PD-L1 enhancer. (F) C-Jun enrichment at the PD-L1 gene enhancer in the control and glutamine deprivation with or without inhibitors was performed by ChIP coupled with qPCR. Ratio quantification of the specific phosphorylations was analysed. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
To investigate whether c-Jun, a downstream regulator in the MEK/ERK signaling pathway, regulates the transcription of PD-L1 under glutamine deprivation, we performed a ChIP assay to confirm the binding region of c-Jun to the PD-L1 gene in T24 cells. The results showed that there was significant binding of c-Jun to the PD-L1 enhancer region and that the fold enrichment was higher in the glutamine deprivation group than in the control group. In addition, the fold enrichment was reduced when inhibitors of the MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway (MEK inhibitor: U0126; ERK inhibitor: SCH772984; c-Jun inhibitor: SP600125) were added (Figures 2E,F). In summary, our results showed that glutamine deprivation may regulate the transcription of PD-L1 by activating the MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway.
To further confirm that PD-L1 upregulation is induced by glutamine deprivation through EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway activation, inhibitors of EGFR, MEK, ERK and c-Jun were used in T24 and TCCSUP cells. First, cells cultured in glutamine-free culture medium were simultaneously treated with different concentrations of EGFR, MEK, ERK and c-Jun inhibitors to determine the optimal dosages. Then, the cells were cultured in normal medium and glutamine-free culture medium with or without the optimal dose of EGFR, MEK, ERK or c-Jun inhibitors. The results showed that pEGFR, pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 levels were all reduced by the EGFR inhibitor (AZD9291) and the optimal doses were 4 μM in the two cell lines (Figures 3A,C). Upon the addition of the optimal doses of AZD9291, pEGFR, pMEK, pERK , pc-Jun and PD-L1 were all reduced no matter the glutamine present or not (Figures 3B,D). The corresponding protein quantification analysis of Figure 3 was shown in Supplementary Figure S3. When the dose of the pMEK inhibitor (U0126) increased, the pMEK level was elevated by negative feedback (Eppstein et al., 2006), but the subsequent pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 levels were significantly reduced. The optimal doses of U0126 in T24 and TCCSUP cells were 8 and 20 μM respectively (Figures 4A, 5A). The optimal doses of inhibitors for pERK and pc-Jun in T24 cells were 1 μM (SCH772984) and 20 μM (SP600125), respectively (Figures 4C,E). In TCCSUP cells, they were 0.25 and 20 μM, respectively (Figures 5C,E). The difference in dose is probably due to different sensitivities to inhibitors in different cells. Upon the addition of the optimal doses of pMEK and pERK inhibitors to T24 and TCCSUP cells, the levels of pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 were reduced in both normal and glutamine-free culture medium. Furthermore, inhibiting pMEK or pERK activation at T24 reduced the elevated PD-L1 expression induced by glutamine deprivation at 6, 12, and 24 h, especially at 12 and 24 h (Figures 4B,D), and inhibiting pMEK or pERK activation at TCCSUP also reduced the elevated PD-L1 expression induced by glutamine deprivation at 15 h (Figures 5B,D). Upon the addition of the optimal dose (20 μM) of pc-Jun inhibitor to T24 and TCCSUP cells, pc-Jun and PD-L1 were reduced in both normal and glutamine-free culture medium. These results showed that inhibiting pc-Jun activation could decrease the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation (Figures 4F, 5F). The protein quantification analyses of Figures 4, 5 were shown in Supplementary Figures S4, S5 respectively (Supplementary Figures S4, S5). Except for the inhibitors, positive controls were performed by EGF (a ligand of EGFR, often used to activate ERK signaling) and anisomycin (a JNK activator, which can activate c-Jun). The results showed that pERK and PD-L1 levels could be elevated by EGF in both T24 and TCCSUP cells, and this effect increases with EGF dose increasing (Figures 6A,B). The pc-Jun and PD-L1 levels were also elevated by anisomycin in the two cell lines (Figures 6C,D). Overall, our results clearly showed that inhibiting EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway activation could reduce the elevated PD-L1 expression induced by glutamine deprivation.
FIGURE 3. Inhibiting EGFR activation can reduce the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation in T24 and TCCSUP cells. (A) The protein levels of pEGFR, pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells cultured in glutamine-free medium with different concentrations of the pEGFR inhibitor (AZD9291: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μM) for 24 h. (B) The protein levels of pEGFR, pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with AZD9291 (4 μM) for 24 h. (C) The protein levels of pEGFR, pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells cultured in glutamine-free medium with different concentrations of the pEGFR inhibitor (AZD9291: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μM) for 15 h. (D) The protein levels of pEGFR, pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with AZD9291 (4 μM) for 15 h.
FIGURE 4. Inhibiting pMEK, pERK or pc-Jun activation can reduce the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation in T24 cells.(A) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells cultured in glutamine-free medium with different concentrations of the pMEK inhibitor (U0126: 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μM) for 24 h. (B) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pMEK inhibitor (8 μM) for 6, 12 and 24 h. (C) The protein levels of pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells cultured in glutamine-free medium with different concentrations of the pERK inhibitor (SCH772984: 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 μM) for 24 h. (D) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pERK inhibitor (1 μM) for 6, 12 and 24 h. (E) The protein levels of pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells cultured in glutamine-free medium with different concentrations of the pc-Jun inhibitor (SP600125: 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) for 24 h. (F) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pc-Jun inhibitor (20 μM) for 6, 12 and 24 h.
FIGURE 5. Inhibiting pMEK, pERK or pc-Jun activation can reduce the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation in TCCSUP cells. (A) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium with different concentrations of the pMEK inhibitor (U0126: 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) for 15 h. (B) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pMEK inhibitor (20 μM) for 15 h. (C) The protein levels of pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium with different concentrations of the pERK inhibitor (SCH772984: 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 μM) for 15 h. (D) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pERK inhibitor (0.25 μM) for 15 h (E) The protein expression of pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in glutamine-free culture medium with different concentrations of the pc-Jun inhibitor (SP600125: 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) for 15 h. (F) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells after culturing in normal or glutamine-free culture medium with the pc-Jun inhibitor (20 μM) for 15 h.
FIGURE 6. PD-L1 expression was upregulated by EGF and Anisomycin in T24 and TCCSUP cells. (A,B) The protein levels of pERK and PD-L1 in T24 and TCCSUP cells after culturing with different concentrations of EGF (a ligand of EGFR, often used to activate ERK signal, 0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 μg/ml) for 2 h (C,D) The protein levels of pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 and TCCSUP cells after culturing with different concentrations of Anisomycin (a JNK activator, which can activate c-Jun, 0, 0.2, 0.5 and 1 μM) for 24 h. The densitometric analysis of proteins was performed and the results were normalized to GAPDH. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Reducing the Upregulated PD-L1 and MEK/ERK/C-Jun Signaling Pathway Through Glutamine Recovery in vitro and in vivo
To investigate the changes in PD-L1 expression and MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway activation after glutamine recovery, T24 and TCCSUP cells were cultured in glutamine-free culture medium for 24 or 15 h; the culture medium was then replaced with normal medium for another 24 h. The expression of PD-L1, pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun was detected by Western blotting. The results showed that the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation was decreased by glutamine recovery and that MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway activation was also decreased after glutamine recovery (Figures 7A,B). The protein quantification analyses of Figures 7A,B were shown in Supplementary Figure S6.
FIGURE 7. Upregulation of PD-L1 and the MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway were reduced after glutamine recovery in vitro and in vivo. (A,B) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 in T24 and TCCSUP cells after glutamine recovery (Re: glutamine recovery). (C) The mRNA level of PD-L1 after glutamine supplementation in T24 xenografts. (D) The protein levels of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 after glutamine supplementation in T24 xenografts. Three samples for each group were shown. The densitometric analysis of proteins was performed. (E) PD-L1 expression after glutamine supplementation in T24 xenografts was investigated by fluorescence microscopy and the mean fluorescence density was analyzed by ImageJ software. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
To further confirm whether this PD-L1 recovery occurred in tumor tissues that lacked glutamine, an in vivo xenograft model was used. The mice bearing tumors were arbitrarily assigned to two groups, namely, the PBS control group and glutamine complement group, to receive intratumoral injections. After six treatments, no significant abnormalities were observed in the mice, and there were no abnormal changes in the body weights of either the control or experimental group. The tumors were harvested to detect PD-L1 expression and MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway activation. Our results showed that the mRNA level of PD-L1 in the glutamine supplementation group was obviously lower than that in the control group (Figure 7C), which was consistent with the immunofluorescence results (Figure 7E). The results of the Western blot analysis also confirmed that PD-L1 expression could be reduced by glutamine supplementation in T24 xenografts (Figure 7D). Furthermore, we confirmed that MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway activation was also reduced by glutamine supplementation (Figure 7D).
PD-L1 Upregulation by Glutamine Deprivation Influences T Cell Function
To investigate whether PD-L1 upregulation by glutamine deprivation in T24 and TCCSUP cells affects the function of T cells, T24 and TCCSUP cells were pretreated under glutamine deprivation conditions with pMEK inhibitor or not. Then, CD3+ T cells were cocultured with bladder cancer cells pretreated with different conditions, and IFN-γ production was detected by ELISA. The results of flow cytometry showed that the purity of CD3+ T cells was greater than 90% after culturing (Figure 8A). The expression of PD-L1 in T24 and TCCSUP cells was elevated by glutamine deprivation and decreased when U0126 was added simultaneously (Figures 8B,C). Afterward, T cells were cultured with T24 or TCCSUP cells with different pretreatments for 15 h in normal medium. Even though the elevated PD-L1 could decreased slightly due to glutamine recovery in 15 h, it was still higher than the normal control (Supplementary Figure S7). Compared with the normal control group, the IFN-γ concentration was decreased after culturing with glutamine-free-treated T24 and TCCSUP cells but was enhanced after culturing with glutamine-free/U0126-treated cells (Figures 8D,E). Overall, our results suggested that PD-L1 upregulation by glutamine deprivation decreased IFN-γ production by T cells, and that the MEK inhibitor reversed this process.
FIGURE 8. PD-L1 upregulation by glutamine deprivation in T24 and TCCSUP cells decreases IFN-γ production by T cells in coculture conditions. (A) The purity of CD3+ T cells was assessed by flow cytometry. (B) The protein levels of PD-L1 in T24 cells after culturing in normal medium and glutamine-free culture medium with or without U0126 (8 μM). (C) The protein expression of PD-L1 in TCCSUP cells cultured in normal medium and glutamine-free culture medium with or without U0126 (20 μM). (D) The production of IFN-γ by T cells after coculturing with T24 cells by different pretreatments. (E) The production of IFN-γ by T cells after coculturing with TCCSUP cells by different pretreatments. The densitometric analysis of proteins was performed and the results were normalized to GAPDH. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001).
Discussion
The expression of PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment is involved not only in signaling pathways, transcriptional regulation and epigenetic regulation but also in inflammatory cytokine production (Boussiotis 2016; Chen et al., 2016). However, few studies have reported whether nutrients in the tumor microenvironment regulate PD-L1 expression in cancer cells. Glutamine metabolism inherent in tumors is well studied, but its effects on the immune microenvironment are not well studied (Faiena et al., 2019). Because of the lack of glutamine in tumor tissues, we assessed whether glutamine deprivation was associated with PD-L1 expression and further influenced immune function. The majority of bladder cancer cases are relevant to transitional cell carcinoma. The T24 cell line, which is derived from human bladder transitional cell carcinoma, is a representative malignant bladder cancer cell line progressing to the muscle layer of the bladder wall, and our previous study revealed that the T24 cell line had a higher rate of tumorigenesis in nude mice. In our study, PD-L1 expression in T24 cells was upregulated by glutamine deprivation. We further found that glutamine deprivation could activate the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway, which mediated the upregulation of PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, PD-L1 upregulation and MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway activation were reduced after glutamine recovery in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, a preliminary study in T24 cells suggested that the PD-L1 elevation induced by glutamine deprivation inhibited the function of T cells. In addition, we performed key in vitro experiments and coculture assays using another bladder cancer cell line (TCCSUP, which is derived from anaplastic transitional cell carcinoma) to further confirm that the expression of PD-L1 was upregulated by glutamine deprivation through the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway to impair T cell function.
Glutamine, a nonessential amino acid, is a major carbon and nitrogen source that supports cancer proliferation and survival by replenishing tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates (Boroughs and DeBerardinis 2015; Coloff et al., 2016). However, in the tumor microenvironment, glutamine is depleted by increased glutamine uptake and poor vascularization. In contrast to other amino acids, glutamine is most depleted in the core regions of solid tumors, including melanoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Kamphorst et al., 2015; Pan et al., 2016). Therefore, cancer cells often develop strategies to survive during periods of glutamine starvation. Studies have demonstrated that the phosphatase PP2A and the transcription factor p53 can promote cancer cell adaptation to glutamine deprivation in colon cancer line (Reid et al., 2013; Tajan et al., 2018) as well as other mechanisms (Pan et al., 2016; Takeuchi et al., 2018). However, in T24 and TCCSUP cells, the mRNA levels of p53 were not significantly different between the control group and glutamine-free group (Supplementary Figure S8). In this study, we discovered that PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer cells was upregulated by glutamine deprivation. This is a newly discovered regulatory mechanism involved in PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer cells and may be one of the strategies used by cancer cells to adapt to nutrient-limiting conditions by immune escape. However, glutamine deprivation-mediated PD-L1 upregulation at 48 h was lower than that at 24 h. This result suggested that glutamine depletion could temporarily upregulate PD-L1 expression to help cancer cells survive in adverse environments. However, because glutamine is essential for the biosynthesis of amino acids, PD-L1 upregulation is weakened when cells suffer from glutamine deprivation over the long term. Similarly, although cancer cells have been reported to develop strategies to support proliferation while glutamine is nearly depleted from culture medium, the cell proliferation rates are markedly reduced when cells are cultured in glutamine-free culture medium (Takeuchi et al., 2018).
It has been reported that pEGFR can be activated by glutamine deprivation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumors (Lee et al., 2019; Lee and Commisso 2020). Other studies have shown that ASCT2 (SLC1A5), a glutamine transporter, is an EGFR-associated protein in EGFR-overexpressing human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (Lu et al., 2016). The MEK/ERK pathway is an oncogenic signaling pathway that is well known for its induction of PD-L1 expression (Ota et al., 2015; Kumar and Sharawat 2018). Recent studies have demonstrated that cancer cells under extreme conditions can upregulate PD-L1 expression through the MEK/ERK pathway. In lung cancer cells, PD-L1 levels can be altered by radiation via the IL-6-MEK/ERK signaling pathway, which can help cancer cells escape killing by natural killer (NK) cells (Shen et al., 2017). In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, PD-L1 expression can also be increased by chemotherapeutic treatments through activating the EGFR/ERK signaling pathway (Ng et al., 2018). In this study, PD-L1 expression was upregulated by glutamine deprivation through activating the EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway in T24 and TCCSUP cells. pEGFR was activated very quickly by glutamine deprivation at 2 or 1 h in T24 and TCCSUP cells respectively. However, according to our previous study in renal cancer cells, pEGFR was activated by glutamine deprivation at 8 h (Ma et al., 2020). This result demonstrates that the EGFR signaling pathway in different cancer cell lines maybe has different sensitivities to glutamine deprivation. Inhibiting pEGFR, pMEK or pERK activation could decrease the PD-L1 elevation induced by glutamine deprivation. However, the phosphorylation time points of pMEK and pERK in T24 and TCCSUP cells were different, and the two cell lines had different sensitivities to pMEK and pERK inhibitors. In addition, pc-Jun, a transcription factor that is downstream of ERK, can regulate PD-L1 expression in NSCLC and melanoma cells (Jiang et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2015). In our study, the level of pc-Jun could be activated by glutamine deprivation, and ChIP analysis confirmed that c-Jun had significant binding to the enhancer region of PD-L1, which regulates the transcription of PD-L1 in T24 cells. Inhibiting pc-Jun activation could reduce PD-L1 elevation. Consequently, PD-L1 upregulation induced by glutamine deprivation was mediated through activation of the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway. Furthermore, the elevated PD-L1 level induced by glutamine deprivation could be decreased by glutamine recovery, and the activation of the MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway was also decreased after glutamine recovery. However, the regulatory mechanism in detail involved in this pathway is still unknown. It was reported that Ca2+ is associated with EGFR in NSCLC and HNSCC cells (Wang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2020), and an increase in intracellular Ca2+ levels could activate the ERK pathway (Ayush et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). We preliminarily found that glutamine deprivation could increase intracellular Ca2+ levels in T24 cells. This result suggested that Ca2+ flux may involved in the activation of EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway by glutamine deprivation. However, this hypothesis needs to be fully confirmed through further investigations. Glutamine levels have been demonstrated to be lower in numerous tumor tissues than in normal tissues (Roberts and Frankel 1949). Moreover, in an in vivo xenograft nude mouse model, glutamine was reported to be even lower in the core regions of tumors than in the periphery (Reid et al., 2013). In this study, we also used an in vivo xenograft model to confirm that supplementation with glutamine could reduce PD-L1 expression in glutamine-depleted tumor tissues.
We speculated that upregulated PD-L1 expression may be one of the strategies that cancer cells use to adapt to glutamine deprivation by immune escape, so we performed a preliminary study on the impacts of PD-L1 on T cells. Our results suggest that PD-L1 upregulation induced by glutamine deprivation could reduce IFN-γ production by T cells and that treatment with the pMEK inhibitor could recover the capacity of T cells to produce IFN-γ. Therefore, we suggest that PD-L1 upregulation under glutamine deprivation in bladder cancer cells is a strategy for inhibiting T cell function under extreme nutritional conditions.
This study reveals a new regulatory mechanism for PD-L1 overexpression that involves glutamine deficiency in bladder cancer cells and the signaling pathways involved in this regulatory process. The results are helpful for understanding how cancer cells promote survival in a glutamine-poor environment. Notably, this study examined whether glutamine deprivation could upregulate PD-L1 expression by activating the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway and performed a preliminary investigation of its effect on the immune system. However, the regulatory mechanism in detail and the complex regulatory relationships with the immune system remain unknown. Further in situ studies with animal models and clinical specimen analyses of bladder cancer also need to be performed. These problems need to be fully understood to increase the efficacy of targeted therapy and will be the focus of our future investigations.
Conclusion
In this study, we observed that PD-L1 expression could be elevated by glutamine deprivation by activating the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway and that this process could reduce the production of IFN-γ by T cells. Moreover, the elevation of PD-L1 expression and the activation of the MEK/ERK/c-Jun pathway could be decreased by glutamine recovery, which was confirmed in a xenograft model in vivo. Our findings provide a new mechanism by which to regulate PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer cells that may be a strategy for cancer cell survival under glutamine deprivation conditions and for escape from the immune system.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture and Glutamine Deprivation
The T24 cell line (RRID: CVCL_0554) was purchased from the Typical Culture Preservation Commission Cell Bank (Shanghai, China) and the TCCSUP cell line (RRID: CVCL_1738) was purchased from Procell (Wuhan, China). All human cell lines were authenticated using STR profiling within the last 3 years, and no mycoplasma contamination was identified. The cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h, the culture medium was replaced with low-glutamine or glutamine-free medium. Cells cultured in normal culture medium served as controls. The expression of pMEK, pERK, pc-Jun and PD-L1 was determined by qPCR, Western blot analysis or immunofluorescence. The enrichment of c-Jun at the PD-L1 gene was performed by ChIP. For the glutamine recovery experiment, normal medium was replaced after 24 h of glutamine deprivation in T24 cells and after 15 h of glutamine deprivation in TCCSUP.
Assays of Inhibitor Treatment
To investigate the signaling pathways related to PD-L1 upregulation under glutamine deprivation, inhibitors were used to suppress the EGFR/MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway. EGFR inhibitor (AZD-9291, cat. no HY-15772), MEK1/2 inhibitor (U0126, cat. no HY-12031), ERK1/2 inhibitor (SCH772984, cat. no HY-50846), JNK1/2/3 inhibitor (SP600125, cat. no HY-12041) and JNK activator (Anisomycin, cat. no HY-18982) were obtained from MCE (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, United States). Recombinant human EGF was obtained from Novus (St. Louis, Missouri, United States). Then, cells were harvested for Western blot analysis or ChIP assays.
Glutamine Supplementation Assay in an in vivo Xenograft Model
Male nude mice (BALB/c; 4–5 weeks old) were obtained from the Beijing Charles River Laboratory Animal Technology (Beijing, China) and maintained under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions. Mice were injected with T24 cells (7 × 106) on their backs. After several weeks, the tumors reached a size of approximately 5 × 5 mm2. Then twelve mice were randomly assigned to 2 groups, namely, the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group and the glutamine supplementation group, to receive intratumoral injections. PBS and glutamine prepared in PBS (1.5 g/L, pH 7.4) were administered separately into the tumors at two locations (20 μl/location). Mice received anintratumoral injection every 3 days. After six injections, all the mice were sacrificed by dislocation of the cervical vertebra. The tumor tissue of each animal was excised and divided into three parts for different analyses: one for RT-PCR analysis, one for Western blot analysis, and one for immunofluorescence analysis. For the animal experiments, protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
IFN-γ Analysis of T Cells
Human peripheral T cells were obtained as previously described (Wang et al., 2018). The study was conducted with approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and written informed consent was obtained from the healthy volunteers. T24 and TCCSUP cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates for 24 h, and then cultured in glutamine-free culture medium with 8 or 20 μM U0126 for another 24 h. Cells cultured in glutamine-free or normal culture medium were used as controls. Then, the culture media of all groups were replaced with fresh normal medium, containing 3 × 105 T cells/well for direct contact with bladder cancer cells. After 15 h, PMA/Iono was added to stimulate T cells for 5 h. Then, the IFN-γ levels in the supernatants of the T cell cocultures were measured using a human IFN-γ ELISA kit (Elabscience, Wuhan, China).
Western Blot Analysis
Total protein was extracted from cells or xenografts in SDS buffer, and a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) was used to measure the protein concentration. After separation by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), the proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, United States). Then membranes were blocked in 5% fat-free milk in PBS-T for 1 h and incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight. The second day, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (JacksonImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, United States; the dilution was 1:10,000) at room temperature for 1 h and detected with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore). AlphaView SA software was used for densitometric analysis, and the results were normalized to GAPDH to correct the differences in protein loading. The following anti-human primary antibodies were used: PD-L1 (#13684, Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, United States), phosphor-EGFR (#3777, CST), EGF receptor (#4267, CST), phospho-MEK1/2 (Ser217/221, #9154, CST), MEK1/2 (#8727, CST), phospho-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204, #4370, CST), ERK1/2 (#4695, CST), phospho-c-Jun (Ser73, #3270, CST), c-Jun (#9165, CST), and GAPDH (#G9545, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States).
Immunofluorescence
T24 cells were grown on glass slides (WHB SCIENTIFIC, Shanghai, China) in 24-well culture plates and then treated with glutamine-free medium. First, the cells were fixed with 4% PBS-buffered paraformaldehyde for 15 min and washed with PBS several times. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 30 min, the cells were incubated with primary antibodies against PD-L1, pMEK, pERK and pc-Jun for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the cells were counterstained with Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) in the dark for 1 h and the cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, IX71, Tokyo, Japan) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (SPE; Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). In addition, four T24 xenografts each group embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT, Miles Inc., Elkhart, IN, United States) were sectioned into 5-μm-thick sections by a cryostat (SLEE International, Inc., New York, NY, United States). Then two slices for each xenografts were adhered to slides, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed with PBS three times. After the xenograft sections were blocked for 1 h, they were incubated with PD-L1 antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The following steps were the same as those in the cell immunofluorescence method described above, and 3 fields were captured for each slice by using fluorescence microscopy.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Total RNA from cells and xenografts was isolated by TRIzol (Code#9109, Takara, Kusatsu, Japan), and 500 ng of total RNA was then transcribed to cDNA by a PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (Takara, Code#RR037A). RT-qPCR was performed with SYBR Green PCR master mix (Takara) by using a Roche LightCycler 480II real-time PCR instrument (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The primers were as follows: PD-L1 (forward): 5′-TATGGTGGTGCCGACTACAA-3’; PD-L1 (reverse): 5′-TGCTTGTCCAGATGACTTCG-3’; GAPDH (forward): 5′-CAGGGCTGCTTTTAACTCTGGTA-3’; and GAPDH (reverse): 5′-CATGGGTGGAATCATATTGGAAC-3’. The fold changes in the expression of each gene were calculated using the formula 2−(ΔΔCt) by the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assays
ChIP assays for T24 were performed as previously described (Lee et al., 2006; Sumimoto et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). Briefly, after culturing in normal and glutamine-free culture medium for 3 h, 5×106 cells were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature and then washed twice with ice-cold 1 × PBS. The samples were lysed and sonicated to shear crosslinked DNA (25 s ON and 15 s OFF, 39% amplitude, 200 cycles for T24 cells). The Dynal Protein G magnetic beads (Thermo 10003D, Shanghai, China) were preincubated with 1–2 μg of antibodies (c-Jun [60A8] Rabbit mAb, #9165, CST; isotype control mAb, Rabbit [DA1E] mAb IgG, #3900, CST) at 4°C overnight and then incubated with the sheared DNA samples for at least 16 h. The conjugated beads were washed sequentially with 1 ml of low-salt, 1 ml of high-salt, 1 ml of LiCl and 1 ml of TE buffer for 45 min each at 4°C. After reverse-crosslinking and RNase A and proteinase K treatment, DNA was isolated with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol. RT-qPCR was performed by a Roche LightCycler 480II real-time PCR instrument with SYBR green reagents and the following primers: forward primer, 5′-GTCACATTTCAAGCAGGATGACT-3′ and reverse primer, 5′-GAGTGGGAAGGGGAGAGAGT-3′.
Statistical Analysis
Each experiment was performed at least three times and the data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses accompanied by graphs were prepared by GraphPad (La Jolla, CA, United States). Comparisons between two groups were calculated using unpaired t-tests, and multiple comparisons were calculated using 2-way ANOVA. The results were considered significant at p < 0.05 (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, LW, YL and HN; Data curation, LW and DL; Funding acquisition, HN, YL; Methodology, LW, TX, XY, ZL, JZ, YC, GM, and YW; Project administration, HN; Writing–original draft, LW; Writing–review and editing, YL.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071750, 81772713, 81472411), Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province (tsqn20161077), Major Science and technology innovation project of Shandong Province (2019JZZY021002), Key projects of Qingdao Science and Technology Program (18-6-1-64-nsh), Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2018GSF118197).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the suggestions of He Ren and Zhiqiang Li which substantially improved this manuscript.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2021.687305/full#supplementary-material
References
Akbay, E. A., Koyama, S., Carretero, J., Altabef, A., Tchaicha, J. H., Christensen, C. L., et al. (2013). Activation of the PD-1 Pathway Contributes to Immune Escape in EGFR-Driven Lung Tumors. Cancer Discov. 3 (12), 1355–1363. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0310
Ayush, O., Jin, Z. W., Kim, H.-K., Shin, Y.-R., Im, S.-Y., and Lee, H.-K. (2016). Glutamine Up-Regulates MAPK Phosphatase-1 Induction via Activation of Ca 2+ → ERK cascade Pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 7, 10–19. doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.05.011
Bellmunt, J., Powles, T., and Vogelzang, N. J. (2017). A Review on the Evolution of PD-1/pd-L1 Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer: The Future Is Now. Cancer Treat. Rev. 54, 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.01.007
Bidnur, S., Savdie, R., and Black, P. C. (2016). Inhibiting Immune Checkpoints for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer. Blc 2 (1), 15–25. doi:10.3233/BLC-150026
Boorjian, S. A., Sheinin, Y., Crispen, P. L., Farmer, S. A., Lohse, C. M., Kuntz, S. M., et al. (2008). T-cell Coregulatory Molecule Expression in Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: Clinicopathologic Correlations and Association with Survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 14 (15), 4800–4808. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0731
Boroughs, L. K., and DeBerardinis, R. J. (2015). Metabolic Pathways Promoting Cancer Cell Survival and Growth. Nat. Cell Biol 17 (4), 351–359. doi:10.1038/ncb3124
Boussiotis, V. A. (2016). Molecular and Biochemical Aspects of the PD-1 Checkpoint Pathway. N. Engl. J. Med. 375 (18), 1767–1778. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1514296
Chen, J., Jiang, C. C., Jin, L., and Zhang, X. D. (2016). Regulation of PD-L1: a Novel Role of Pro-survival Signalling in Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 27 (3), 409–416. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv615
Chen, N., Fang, W., Zhan, J., Hong, S., Tang, Y., Kang, S., et al. (2015). Upregulation of PD-L1 by EGFR Activation Mediates the Immune Escape in EGFR-Driven NSCLC: Implication for Optional Immune Targeted Therapy for NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutation. J. Thorac. Oncol. 10 (6), 910–923. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000500
Coloff, J. L., Murphy, J. P., Braun, C. R., Harris, I. S., Shelton, L. M., Kami, K., et al. (2016). Differential Glutamate Metabolism in Proliferating and Quiescent Mammary Epithelial Cells. Cell Metab. 23 (5), 867–880. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.03.016
Dong, H., Strome, S. E., Salomao, D. R., Tamura, H., Hirano, F., Flies, D. B., et al. (2002). Tumor-associated B7-H1 Promotes T-Cell Apoptosis: a Potential Mechanism of Immune Evasion. Nat. Med. 8 (8), 793–800. doi:10.1038/nm730
Eppstein, A. C., Sandoval, J. A., Klein, P. J., Woodruff, H. A., Grosfeld, J. L., Hickey, R. J., et al. (2006). Differential Sensitivity of Chemoresistant Neuroblastoma Subtypes to MAPK-Targeted Treatment Correlates with ERK, P53 Expression, and Signaling Response to U0126. J. Pediatr. Surg. 41 (1), 252–259. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.047
Faiena, I., Ueno, D., and Shuch, B. (2019). Glutamine and the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Eur. Urol. 75 (5), 764–765. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.015
Ishak Gabra, M. B., Lowman, X. H., Reid, M. A., Tran, T. Q., Kong, M., and Kong, M. (2018). IKKβ Activates P53 to Promote Cancer Cell Adaptation to Glutamine Deprivation. Oncogenesis 7 (11), 93. doi:10.1038/s41389-018-0104-0
Iwai, Y., Ishida, M., Tanaka, Y., Okazaki, T., Honjo, T., and Minato, N. (2002). Involvement of PD-L1 on Tumor Cells in the Escape from Host Immune System and Tumor Immunotherapy by PD-L1 Blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (19), 12293–12297. doi:10.1073/pnas.192461099
Jiang, X., Zhou, J., Giobbie-Hurder, A., Wargo, J., and Hodi, F. S. (2013). The Activation of MAPK in Melanoma Cells Resistant to BRAF Inhibition Promotes PD-L1 Expression that Is Reversible by MEK and PI3K Inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 19 (3), 598–609. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2731
Kamphorst, J. J., Nofal, M., Commisso, C., Hackett, S. R., Lu, W., Grabocka, E., et al. (2015). Human Pancreatic Cancer Tumors Are Nutrient Poor and Tumor Cells Actively Scavenge Extracellular Protein. Cancer Res. 75 (3), 544–553. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2211
Kim, M. S., Kim, S. H., Yang, S. H., and Kim, M. S. (2020). Restricting Extracellular Ca2+ on Gefitinib-Resistant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Reverses Altered Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Ca2+ Response, Which Consequently Enhances Gefitinib Sensitivity. PLoS ONE 15, e0238155. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238155
Kumar, S., and Sharawat, S. K. (2018). Epigenetic Regulators of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Human Cancers. Translational Res. 202, 129–145. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2018.05.011
Lee, S.-W., and Commisso, C. (2020). Metabolic Regulation of EGFR Effector and Feedback Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer Cells Requires K-Ras. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 533 (3), 424–428. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.09.029
Lee, S.-W., Zhang, Y., Jung, M., Cruz, N., Alas, B., and Commisso, C. (2019). EGFR-pak Signaling Selectively Regulates Glutamine Deprivation-Induced Macropinocytosis. Dev. Cell 50 (3), 381–392. e385. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.043
Lee, T. I., Johnstone, S. E., and Young, R. A. (2006). Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and Microarray-Based Analysis of Protein Location. Nat. Protoc. 1 (2), 729–748. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.98
Leone, R. D., Zhao, L., Englert, J. M., Sun, I.-M., Oh, M.-H., Sun, I.-H., et al. (2019). Glutamine Blockade Induces Divergent Metabolic Programs to Overcome Tumor Immune Evasion. Science 366 (6468), 1013–1021. doi:10.1126/science.aav2588
Li, S., Zhou, Q., Liu, W., Fu, Z., Zhao, H., and Xi, S. (2021). Targeting SLC1A5 Blocks Cell Proliferation through Inhibition of mTORC1 in Arsenite-Treated Human Uroepithelial Cells. Toxicol. Lett. 345, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.03.007
Liang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, L., Liang, Z., Li, D., Xu, X., et al. (2021). Self-crosslinkable Chitosan-Hyaluronic Acid Dialdehyde Nanoparticles for CD44-Targeted siRNA Delivery to Treat Bladder Cancer. Bioactive Mater. 6 (2), 433–446. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.019
Lu, H., Li, X., Lu, Y., Qiu, S., and Fan, Z. (2016). ASCT2 (SLC1A5) Is an EGFR-Associated Protein that Can Be Co-targeted by Cetuximab to Sensitize Cancer Cells to ROS-Induced Apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 381 (1), 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.07.020
Ma, G., Liang, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Li, D., Liang, Z., et al. (2020). Glutamine Deprivation Induces PD-L1 Expression via Activation of EGFR/ERK/c-Jun Signaling in Renal Cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 18 (2), 324–339. doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-19-0517
Marzec, M., Zhang, Q., Goradia, A., Raghunath, P. N., Liu, X., Paessler, M., et al. (2008). Oncogenic Kinase NPM/ALK Induces through STAT3 Expression of Immunosuppressive Protein CD274 (PD-L1, B7-H1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105 (52), 20852–20857. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810958105
Nakanishi, J., Wada, Y., Matsumoto, K., Azuma, M., Kikuchi, K., and Ueda, S. (2007). Overexpression of B7-H1 (PD-L1) Significantly Associates with Tumor Grade and Postoperative Prognosis in Human Urothelial Cancers. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 56 (8), 1173–1182. doi:10.1007/s00262-006-0266-z
Ng, H. Y., Li, J., Tao, L., Lam, A. K.-Y., Chan, K. W., Ko, J. M. Y., et al. (2018). Chemotherapeutic Treatments Increase PD-L1 Expression in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma through EGFR/ERK Activation. Translational Oncol. 11 (6), 1323–1333. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.005
Noman, M. Z., Desantis, G., Janji, B., Hasmim, M., Karray, S., Dessen, P., et al. (2014). PD-L1 Is a Novel Direct Target of HIF-1α, and its Blockade under Hypoxia Enhanced MDSC-Mediated T Cell Activation. J. Exp. Med. 211 (5), 781–790. doi:10.1084/jem.20131916
Ota, K., Azuma, K., Kawahara, A., Hattori, S., Iwama, E., Tanizaki, J., et al. (2015). Induction of PD-L1 Expression by the EML4-ALK Oncoprotein and Downstream Signaling Pathways in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21 (17), 4014–4021. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0016
Pan, M., Reid, M. A., Lowman, X. H., Kulkarni, R. P., Tran, T. Q., Liu, X., et al. (2016). Regional Glutamine Deficiency in Tumours Promotes Dedifferentiation through Inhibition of Histone Demethylation. Nat. Cell Biol 18 (10), 1090–1101. doi:10.1038/ncb3410
Reid, M. A., Wang, W.-I., Rosales, K. R., Welliver, M. X., Pan, M., and Kong, M. (2013). The B55α Subunit of PP2A Drives a P53-dependent Metabolic Adaptation to Glutamine Deprivation. Mol. Cell 50 (2), 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.02.008
Roberts, E., and Frankel, S. (1949). Free Amino Acids in normal and Neoplastic Tissues of Mice as Studied by Paper Chromatography. Cancer Res. 9 (11), 645.
Sharma, N. S., Gupta, V. K., Garrido, V. T., Hadad, R., Durden, B. C., Kesh, K., et al. (2019). Targeting Tumor-Intrinsic Hexosamine Biosynthesis Sensitizes Pancreatic Cancer to Anti-PD1 Therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 130 (1), 451–465. doi:10.1172/Jci127515
Shen, M. J., Xu, L. J., Yang, L., Tsai, Y., Keng, P. C., Chen, Y., et al. (2017). Radiation Alters PD-L1/nkg2d Ligand Levels in Lung Cancer Cells and Leads to Immune Escape from NK Cell Cytotoxicity via IL-6-MEK/Erk Signaling Pathway. Oncotarget 8 (46), 80506–80520. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19193
Sumimoto, H., Takano, A., Teramoto, K., and Daigo, Y. (2016). RAS-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signal Is Required for Enhanced PD-L1 Expression in Human Lung Cancers. PLoS One 11 (11), e0166626. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166626
Sundararajan, S., and Vogelzang, N. J. (2015). Anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 Therapy for Bladder Cancer: what Is on the Horizon? Future Oncol. 11 (16), 2299–2306. doi:10.2217/fon.15.162
Tajan, M., Hock, A. K., Blagih, J., Robertson, N. A., Labuschagne, C. F., Kruiswijk, F., et al. (2018). A Role for P53 in the Adaptation to Glutamine Starvation through the Expression of SLC1A3. Cell Metab. 28 (5), 721–736. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.07.005
Takeuchi, Y., Nakayama, Y., Fukusaki, E., and Irino, Y. (2018). Glutamate Production from Ammonia via Glutamate Dehydrogenase 2 Activity Supports Cancer Cell Proliferation under Glutamine Depletion. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 495 (1), 761–767. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.088
Tran, T. Q., Lowman, X. H., Reid, M. A., Mendez-Dorantes, C., Pan, M., Yang, Y., et al. (2017). Tumor-associated Mutant P53 Promotes Cancer Cell Survival upon Glutamine Deprivation through P21 Induction. Oncogene 36 (14), 1991–2001. doi:10.1038/onc.2016.360
van Hooren, L., Sandin, L. C., Moskalev, I., Ellmark, P., Dimberg, A., Black, P., et al. (2017). Local Checkpoint Inhibition of CTLA-4 as a Monotherapy or in Combination with Anti-PD1 Prevents the Growth of Murine Bladder Cancer. Eur. J. Immunol. 47 (2), 385–393. doi:10.1002/eji.201646583
Wang, C., Du, J., Chen, X., Zhu, Y., and Sun, H. (2019). Activation of RAW264.7 Macrophages by Active Fraction of Albizia Julibrissin Saponin via Ca2+-Erk1/2-CREB-lncRNA Pathways. Int. Immunopharmacology 77, 105955. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105955
Wang, H., Zou, L., Ma, K., Yu, J., Wu, H., Wei, M., et al. (2017). Cell-specific Mechanisms of TMEM16A Ca2+-Activated Chloride Channel in Cancer. Mol. Cancer 16 (1), 152. doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0720-x
Wang, L., Yang, X., Li, D., Liang, Z., Chen, Y., Ma, G., et al. (2018). The Elevated Glutaminolysis of Bladder Cancer and T Cells in a Simulated Tumor Microenvironment Contributes to the Up-Regulation of PD-L1 Expression by Interferon-γ. Ott 11, 7229–7243. doi:10.2147/OTT.S180505
Keywords: glutamine deprivation, PD-L1, bladder cancer, T cells, MEK/ERK/c-Jun signaling pathway
Citation: Wang L, Xu T, Yang X, Liang Z, Zhang J, Li D, Chen Y, Ma G, Wang Y, Liang Y and Niu H (2021) Immunosuppression Induced by Glutamine Deprivation Occurs via Activating PD-L1 Transcription in Bladder Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8:687305. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.687305
Received: 29 March 2021; Accepted: 22 October 2021;
Published: 05 November 2021.
Edited by:
Catalina Dirney Alba Soto, University of Buenos Aires, ArgentinaReviewed by:
Soudamani Singh, Marshall University, United StatesCinzia Rinaldo, Italian National Research Council, Italy
Copyright © 2021 Wang, Xu, Yang, Liang, Zhang, Li, Chen, Ma, Wang, Liang and Niu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ye Liang, liangye82812@163.com; Haitao Niu, niuht0532@126.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work