Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol., 19 May 2022
Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology
This article is part of the Research Topic The Advances in Proteomics and Targeted Therapy of Malignant Brain Tumours View all 8 articles

Elevated Serum Lactate in Glioma Patients: Associated Factors

Beathe Sitter*Beathe Sitter1*Annamaria ForsmarkAnnamaria Forsmark2Ole Solheim,Ole Solheim3,4
  • 1Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • 2Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nord-Trondelag Health Trust, Levanger, Norway
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
  • 4Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Introduction: Serum lactate levels in brain cancer patients correlate with tumor malignancy grading, and serum lactate has been suggested as a potential biomarker and prognostic factor. The purpose of this study was to identify potential sources of elevated serum lactate in patients with brain gliomas by examining factors of importance for serum lactate production and clearance.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, data were collected from 261 glioma patients who underwent surgery from March 2011 to June 2015. We recorded patient gender, age, blood serum measures of lactate, glucose, pH, hemoglobin and base excess, patient health status, medications, and tumor characteristics. Patients with elevated and normal serum lactate levels were compared, and we explored if there were correlations between the variables. The association of serum lactate with the measured variables was investigated by simple and multivariable linear regression models.

Results and Discussion: Patients with elevated serum lactate had higher blood glucose, larger tumor volumes, and more tumor edema; more often needed pressor medication during surgery; and more often received corticosteroid treatment. The investigated variables were highly correlated. Multivariable linear regression indicated that gender, tumor volume, Charlson Comorbidity Index, hyperglycemia, and corticosteroid treatment were associated with serum lactate levels. Histopathology was not an independent factor. In conclusion, comorbidities, hyperglycemia, and presurgical corticosteroid treatment exhibited the strongest association with serum lactate in glioma patients.

1 Introduction

Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor (1). Gliomas are classified into four groups based on their histopathological and molecular features (World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system; WHO 1-4) (2). This grading predicts clinical behavior and is key for treatment decisions. The most malignant form (WHO 4) is glioblastoma multiforme, which has a dismal prognosis (3). Only 3%–5% of glioblastoma patients survive 5 years or more, and this low survival rate has changed little in the past decades (4).

Blood serum lactate has been proposed as a biomarker for tumor malignancy and a prognostic factor for brain tumor patients (511). Hyperlactatemia (blood serum lactate >2 mmol/L) has been reported more frequently in patients with high-grade than low-grade brain tumors (5, 6, 8, 11). Also, higher blood serum levels have been found in high-grade glioma (HGG) compared to low-grade glioma (LGG) patients, and patients with elevated blood serum lactate (≥2 mmol/L) had shorter progression-free survival (9). It has been suggested that the production of lactate in the tumor could be the source of elevated blood serum lactate in patients with malignant brain tumors (5, 8). It is well documented that malignant brain tumors can produce lactate not only by anaerobe glucose metabolism but also by conversion of glucose to lactate in the presence of oxygen, known as the Warburg effect (1214). However, it is not known to what extent this lactate production is reflected in the serum.

Several patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors can increase serum lactate levels by increasing production and/or reducing clearance (15). Other conditions and their treatments, like diabetes mellitus, can also impact serum lactate levels. The aim of this study was to examine potential patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors for their association with elevated serum lactate in patients with glioma and to explore potential causes of elevated serum lactate in these patients.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Study Population

In this cross-sectional study, we collected data from patient files and anesthesia records from a local registry of patients who underwent surgical biopsy or resection for intracranial tumors. We screened patients treated for brain tumors from March 2011 to June 2015 at St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, and we identified patients with documented serum lactate measures in their anesthesia journal (N = 659). Patients with other tumor entities than diffuse glioma WHO grades 2–4 (N = 392) and patients in whom blood gas analysis was done more than 30 min after surgery started (N = 6) were excluded. A total of 261 patients with diffuse gliomas verified by histopathology were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 59 years, ranging from 18 to 84 years. Demographic data of the patient cohort are presented in Table 1. The study was approved by the Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC-Id 2015/1181). All patients have signed informed consent for the data registration.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Age and gender of patients diagnosed with low-grade (WHO 1 and 2) and high-grade (WHO 3 and 4) glioma at time of surgery (N = 266).

2.2 Data Collection

We recorded serum lactate and measures of patient-related, tumor-related, and treatment-related factors. This included patient gender and age, analysis of blood gasses (serum lactate, glucose, hemoglobin (Hb), base excess (BE), and pH), presurgical volumes of tumors, the largest diameter of tumor edema calculated from MR images, tumor histopathology according to the 2007 and 2016 WHO classification (2, 16), if it was a primary operation for a brain tumor, and preoperative Karnofsky performance scale (17) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (18) if a patient had hyperglycemia, diabetes, intraoperative hypotension, pressor treatment during tumor surgery, and presurgical treatment with corticosteroids. The Karnofsky performance scale, ranging from 100 to 0, classifies patients according to their functional impairment, with high scores for high functionality (17). CCI is based on 17 categories of medical conditions (18). Higher scores predict a higher risk for mortality or resource use. CCI values were dichotomized between 0–1 and 2 or higher. Tumor histopathology was dichotomized to LGG for WHO grade 2 and to HGG for WHO grades 3 and 4. The blood samples were collected within the first 30 min of surgery, after induction of anesthesia but before removal of the tumor. The samples were analyzed within 10 min using the ABL800 FLEX (Radiometer Medical ApS, København, Denmark).

2.3 Statistical Analysis

2.3.1 Univariate Analysis for Serum Lactate

Patient age and gender, blood gasses (glucose, hemoglobin (Hb), BE, and pH), tumor characteristics (tumor volume, tumor edema, and dichotomized histopathological grading), whether it was primary surgery, other conditions and diseases (Karnofsky performance scale, dichotomized CCI, hyperglycemia, diabetes, and intraoperative hypotension), and medication (intraoperative pressor and corticosteroids) were compared for patients with normal (≤1.6 mmol/L) and with elevated serum lactate (>1.6 mmol/L). Continuous variables were checked for normality by QQ plots. Age, Hb, BE, pH, and Karnofsky performance scale demonstrated the normal distribution of values, whereas glucose, tumor volume, and tumor edema all demonstrated distribution that deviated from normal. We thus used Student’s t-test and median test to compare mean values for continuous variables between groups of patients accordingly and by Fisher’s exact test for all dichotomous variables. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05, and corrections for multiple hypothesis testing were done with the Bonferroni method.

2.3.2 Correlation Analysis

Correlation between variables was investigated by Pearson’s correlation analysis when including continuous variables and by Fisher’s exact test and Spearman’s rho for dichotomous variables.

2.3.3 Linear Regression

Simple linear regression models for serum lactate were calculated for all variables that could predict serum lactate elevation. These were the patient’s gender, age, tumor volume, tumor edema, dichotomized tumor grading, whether it was a primary operation, Karnofsky performance scale, dichotomized CCI, hyperglycemia, diabetes, intraoperative hypotension, and treatment with pressor during anesthesia/tumor surgery or presurgical corticosteroids.

All variables that had coefficients significant at a 0.20 level in the simple regression models were included in the multivariable linear regression model. The multivariable linear regression model was stepwise adjusted by removing variables with the largest p-value until all variable coefficients in the model were significant at a 0.10 level.

All statistical analyses were conducted in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 28).

3 Results

3.1 Univariate Analysis for Serum Lactate

Mean values with SD for continuous variables and frequencies for dichotomous variables are presented in Table 2 for patients with normal (≤1.6 mmol/L) and elevated (>1.6 mmol/L) serum lactate. Table 2 shows statistically significant differences after Bonferroni correction (q < 0.05) for seven of the measured variables. Patients with elevated serum lactate had higher blood glucose and larger tumor volume and tumor edema and were more frequently diagnosed with hyperglycemia and diabetes and treated with pressor and corticosteroids as compared to patients with normal serum lactate levels.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Variable values for patients with normal (≤1.6 mmol/L) and elevated (>1.6 mmol/L) values of serum lactate, given as mean values with SD for continuous variables, and as frequency of patients in numbers and percentages for dichotomous variables.

3.2 Correlation Analysis

Correlation coefficients of all investigated variables are shown with a heatmap in Table 3. All variables correlated with at least one other variable. pH had the lowest number of correlations, correlating only with BE. Nine of the variables (serum lactate, age, blood glucose, BE, tumor volume, tumor edema, glioma grading, Karnofsky performance scale, and treatment with corticosteroids) correlated with half or more of the other variables. Most correlations were weak (0.10–0.39), and the strongest correlations were moderate (0.40–0.69). Serum lactate had one moderate correlation (0.477), to corticosteroid treatment.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Correlation matrix with heatmap of coefficients between all variables.

3.3 Linear Regression

Table 4 shows coefficients and p-values from simple linear regression models and the adjusted multivariable linear regression model of serum lactate. With the exception of gender, primary operation, and hypotension, all variable coefficients were significant (p < 0.05) in simple linear predictions of serum lactate. Five of the variable coefficients—gender, tumor volume, dichotomized CCI, hyperglycemia, and corticosteroid treatment— were significant in the adjusted multivariable model at a 0.10 level of significance. The adjusted multivariable regression model described 30.1% of the variation in serum lactate (ANOVA: p < 0.05).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Variables and their coefficients and p-values for simple and adjusted multivariable linear regression models of serum lactate.

4 Discussion

Patients with elevated serum lactate had higher blood glucose and larger tumor volume and tumor edema and were more frequently diagnosed with hyperglycemia and diabetes and treated with pressor intraoperatively and corticosteroids before surgery than patients with normal levels of serum lactate. Elevation of lactate is seemingly more associated with factors associated with corticosteroid use than histopathology. Lactate does not seem to be an attractive biomarker in glioma.

The adjusted multivariable regression model indicated that male patients with glioma had 0.1 mmol/L higher levels of serum lactate than women. Lactate reference values for men and women are the same (19), and this calculated association between gender and serum lactate levels may be an indirect effect. Tumor volume was found to be statistically significant for serum lactate levels. However, differences in tumor volume were associated with minor changes in serum lactate values (Table 4). Patients with CCI of 2 or higher and hyperglycemia would have markedly higher serum lactate levels than patients with CCI scores of 1 or 0 and normal glucose levels. The variable with the largest impact was corticosteroid treatment, as patients on corticosteroid treatment had 0.5 mmol/L higher estimated levels of serum lactate than patients that were not treated with corticosteroids.

The variables investigated for associations with serum lactate levels showed several covariations. This lack of independence of variables in the multiple linear regression can affect the resulting coefficients and p-values. Of the five variables included in the adjusted multivariable model (Table 4), gender and CCI were not correlated to other variables in the model, whereas corticosteroid treatment was correlated to tumor volume and hyperglycemia (Table 3). The p-values of coefficients for these three variables were highly significant (p ≤ 0.008), and thus we presume the regression model to be valid. Tumor volume, hyperglycemia, and corticosteroid treatment were also found to be significantly different in patients with elevated compared to normal serum lactate (Table 2), supporting that these three factors may explain serum lactate levels. Still, there is a risk of overfitting regression models by selecting variables based on p-values. As a scatter plot (not shown) of standardized residuals against predicted values for lactate showed no specific pattern, the model is presumed to not be overfitted.

We observed that elevated serum lactate levels were more frequent in patients with HGG than LGG (Table 2), which agrees with the previously reported findings (5, 6, 8, 11). Previously, logistic regression by blood metabolites, adjusted for age, gender, steroid use, and other factors, indicated significantly higher levels of lactate and other metabolites in the blood of patients with HGG (10). We also observed a significant correlation between tumor grading and serum lactate (Table 3) and a highly significant single linear regression model for serum lactate with tumor grading as a variable (Table 4). However, tumor grading was not significant in the multivariable regression model. Neither were the patient’s age, tumor edema, primary operation, Karnofsky performance scale, diabetes, hypotension, or intraoperative treatment with pressor. Gender, tumor volume, CCI, hyperglycemia, and corticosteroid treatment appear as the most important of the investigated factors for serum lactate levels in glioma patients. Since tumor volume is correlated to gender (20) and corticosteroid treatment, and hyperglycemia may result from corticosteroid treatment, corticosteroid treatment or stress responses may emerge as a common trait.

Tumors can produce lactate also under sufficient oxygen supply (21). Excessive production of lactate is associated with increased aggressiveness, as it acidifies the extracellular environment that induces invasion and metastasis and inhibits the antitumor immune response and resistance to therapy (22). Previous studies with the correlation between tumor malignancy and serum lactate levels have identified serum lactate as a potential biomarker of malignancy of adult brain tumors (5, 8). Our study indicates that although serum lactate is associated with tumor volume and histopathological grading, comorbidities, hyperglycemia, and treatment with corticosteroids have a larger impact. Corticosteroid treatment can release glucose, increase insulin resistance, and increase lactate production (23). Increased serum lactate levels after corticosteroid treatment during cardiac surgery have been reported. Dexamethasone is commonly used in the management of glioma patients to treat peritumoral edema and to control neurological symptoms (24).

The investigated associations of serum lactate levels and patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors revealed comorbidity, hyperglycemia, and corticosteroid treatment as the most important factors. These factors are not directly related to tumor biology. Corticosteroid treatment may be a common trait, and it seems unlikely that serum lactate is a relevant biomarker in glioma. The potential for serum lactate as a biomarker in glioma therefore seems low.

There are limitations to this retrospective study. Ideally, serum lactate should have been measured repeatedly over time, prior to surgery and cancer treatments. Also, knowledge about the type of pressor given to patients would have enabled a more precise evaluation of the association between pressor treatment and serum lactate levels, as only specific pressor types affect serum lactate. However, a strength of this study is the exploration and evaluation of relevant patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors for their association with serum lactate in a significant number of glioma patients. The presented findings should be important for prospective studies of mechanisms behind elevated serum lactate in brain glioma patients.

In conclusion, hyperglycemia, comorbidities, and presurgical corticosteroid treatment appear as the factors with the strongest association with serum lactate in glioma patients.

Data Availability Statement

The data analyzed in this study is subject to the following licenses/restrictions: the ethical approval given to the patient registry does not include the transfer of data. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to beathe.sitter@ntnu.no.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

BS, AF, and OS contributed to the conception and design of the study. AF organized the database. BS performed the statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript draft. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and read and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bauchet L, Ostrom QT. Epidemiology and Molecular Epidemiology. Neurosurg Clin N Am (2019) 30(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2018.08.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Acta Neuropathol (2016) 131(6):803–20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Delgado-Lopez PD, Corrales-Garcia EM. Survival in Glioblastoma: A Review on the Impact of Treatment Modalities. Clin Transl Oncol (2016) 18(11):1062–71. doi: 10.1007/s12094-016-1497-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Szopa W, Burley TA, Kramer-Marek G, Kaspera W. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. BioMed Res Int (2017) 2017:8013575. doi: 10.1155/2017/8013575

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Bharadwaj S, Venkatraghavan L, Mariappan R, Ebinu J, Meng Y, Khan O, et al. Serum Lactate as a Potential Biomarker of non-Glial Brain Tumors. J Clin Neurosci (2015) 22(10):1625–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Branco M, Linhares P, Carvalho B, Santos P, Costa BM, Vaz R. Serum Lactate Levels are Associated With Glioma Malignancy Grade. Clin Neurol Neurosurg (2019) 186:105546. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Cata JP, Bhaysar S, Hagan KB, Arunkumar R, Grasu R, Dang A, et al. Intraoperative Serum Lactate is Not a Predictor of Survival After Glioblastoma Surgery. J Clin Neurosci (2017) 43:224–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mariappan R, Venkatraghavan L, Vertanian A, Agnihotri S, Cynthia S, Reyhani S, et al. Serum Lactate as a Potential Biomarker of Malignancy in Primary Adult Brain Tumours. J Clin Neurosci (2015) 22(1):144–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.06.005[doi

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Shih CC, Lee TS, Tsuang FY, Lin PL, Cheng YJ, Cheng HL, et al. Pretreatment Serum Lactate Level as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Primary Brain Tumor Resection. Oncotarget (2017) 8(38):63715–23. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhao H, Heimberger AB, Lu ZM, Wu XF, Hodges TR, Song RD, et al. Metabolomics Profiling in Plasma Samples From Glioma Patients Correlates With Tumor Phenotypes. Oncotarget (2016) 7(15):20486–95. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7974

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, et al. Inhibitory Effect of Tumor Cell-Derived Lactic Acid on Human T Cells. Blood (2007) 109(9):3812–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035972

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Marie SK, Shinjo SM. Metabolism and Brain Cancer. Clinics (Sao Paulo) (2011) 66 (Suppl 1):33–43. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011001300005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Romero-Garcia S, Moreno-Altamirano MM, Prado-Garcia H, Sanchez-Garcia FJ. Lactate Contribution to the Tumor Microenvironment: Mechanisms, Effects on Immune Cells and Therapeutic Relevance. Front Immunol (2016) 7:52. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Soares DP, Law M. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of the Brain: Review of Metabolites and Clinical Applications. Clin Radiol (2009) 64(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.07.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Andersen LW, Mackenhauer J, Roberts JC, Berg KM, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. Etiology and Therapeutic Approach to Elevated Lactate Levels. Mayo Clin Proc (2013) 88(10):1127–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Perry A, Wesseling P. Histologic Classification of Gliomas. Handb Clin Neurol (2016) 134:71–95. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802997-8.00005-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gunawan PY, Islam AA, July J, Patellongi I, Nasrum M, Aninditha T. Karnofsky Performance Scale and Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology Scale as Early Predictor in Glioma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev (2020) 21(11):3387–92. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.11.3387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Glasheen WP, Cordier T, Gumpina R, Haugh G, Davis J, Renda A. Charlson Comorbidity Index: ICD-9 Update and ICD-10 Translation. Am Health Drug Benefits (2019) 12(4):188–97.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

19. Burtis CA. Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 5 ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences (2012).

Google Scholar

20. Drewes C, Sagberg LM, Jakola AS, Solheim O. Quality of Life in Patients With Intracranial Tumors: Does Tumor Laterality Matter? J Neurosurg (2016) 125(6):1400–7. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS152252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Warburg O. On the Origin of Cancer Cells. Science (1956) 123:309–14. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. de la Cruz-Lopez KG, Castro-Munoz LJ, Reyes-Hernandez DO, Garcia-Carranca A, Manzo-Merino J. Lactate in the Regulation of Tumor Microenvironment and Therapeutic Approaches. Front Oncol (2019) 9:1143. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ottens TH, Nijsten MW, Hofland J, Dieleman JM, Hoekstra M, van Dijk D, et al. Effect of High-Dose Dexamethasone on Perioperative Lactate Levels and Glucose Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care (2015) 19:41. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0736-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shields LB, Shelton BJ, Shearer AJ, Chen L, Sun DA, Parsons S, et al. Dexamethasone Administration During Definitive Radiation and Temozolomide Renders a Poor Prognosis in a Retrospective Analysis of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients. Radiat Oncol (2015) 10:222. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0527-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: glioma, lactate, hyperlactatemia, biomarker, corticosteroid

Citation: Sitter B, Forsmark A and Solheim O (2022) Elevated Serum Lactate in Glioma Patients: Associated Factors. Front. Oncol. 12:831079. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.831079

Received: 07 December 2021; Accepted: 19 April 2022;
Published: 19 May 2022.

Edited by:

Jens Gempt, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Reviewed by:

Victoria Bunik, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
Claire Delbridge, Technical University of Munich, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Sitter, Forsmark and Solheim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Beathe Sitter, beathe.sitter@ntnu.no

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.