Umbilical Cord Milking: A Review
Anup C. Katheria1,2*- 1Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women & Newborns, San Diego, CA, United States
- 2Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, United States
This is a review of umbilical cord milking, a controversial technique where the umbilical cord is squeezed several times before it is clamped an cut. While not physiological or natural for newborns, the question lies as to whether it is useful in certain circumstances, namely the depressed newborn. Here we review the literature and discuss why it could be considered as an alternative for the current practice of delayed cord clamping.
Umbilical Cord Milking: A Review
Over the past decade, there has been a growing evidence that delayed cord clamping is beneficial in term and preterm newborns (1, 2). Meanwhile there is uncertainty about the best method of cord management for infants that are deemed by a provider to be too unstable or to require resuscitation. Delayed cord clamping (DCC) is defined as waiting at least 30–60 s before clamping the umbilical cord (3, 4). This time delay precludes some of the most premature or sickest infants from receiving this beneficial treatment. This has borne out in a number of randomized controlled trials where as many as a quarter of the subjects do not receive DCC (5, 6). Another technique, umbilical cord milking (UCM), consists of gently grasping the uncut umbilical cord and squeezing the cord from the placenta several times toward the infant. In contrast to delayed cord clamping, milking provides a placental transfusion without postponing resuscitation and can be completed as quickly as immediate cord clamping.
The available studies comparing UCM to ICC in term infants include one systematic review (7), five RCTs (8–12), and five older controlled trials (13–17). These studies conclude in aggregate that cord milking significantly improves blood pressure, hematocrit, and hemoglobin levels within the first few days of life and iron stores out to 6 months of age. No associated harm was identified in any study.
For preterm infants, a systematic review (7) and 10 RCTs (18–26) comparing UCM to ICC demonstrate increased blood pressure, hemoglobin, urine output, cerebral oxygenation, decreased risk of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) of all grades, lower chronic lung disease (defined as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks), less necrotizing enterocolitis, lower levels of circulating cytokines and reduced need for transfusions. In late preterm infants, higher ferritin levels at 6 weeks of age have been reported after UCM (27). None of the studies demonstrated harm from UCM in these vulnerable infants, and provide strong evidence that cord milking effectively accelerates placental transfusion at birth resulting in benefits superior to ICC.
To date there are only two trials comparing UCM to DCC in premature infants (28, 29). Rabe et al. demonstrated a similar placental transfusion with a 30-second delay compared to milking the intact umbilical cord four times. Our group demonstrated that infants born by Cesarean Section had improved systemic blood flow (measured by echocardiography), blood pressure, hemoglobin levels and urine output in the first 72 h of life suggested an improved placental transfusion in this subgroup (30). This is significant since 60–70 percent of premature and emergent deliveries are by Cesarean section (31). We speculate that more blood remains in the placenta when a neonate is delivered by Cesarean Section because the anesthetic and surgical interventions interfere with the active contraction of the uterine muscles to expel the placenta.
Breathing and Cord Clamping
It has been suggested that waiting until the infant breathes before the cord is clamped could improve clinical outcomes (32). Animal studies have demonstrated that a physiologic based approach to clamp the cord when the infant has established breathing would be ideal (33). However, this does not preclude the infant from receiving UCM. In fact, UCM before clamping improves the pulmonary blood flow immediately at birth and assists lung expansion at the onset of respirations (see Figure 1, courtesy of S. Lakshminrusimha). Our previous trial of cord milking compared to immediate cord clamping demonstrated increased heart rate, oxygen saturation within the first 5 min of birth compared to immediate cord clamping (34). It also demonstrated decreased number of days on oxygen therapy and reduced chronic lung disease (21). The increase in blood volume to the lungs associated with cord milking has also been documented with recording of electrocardiographic changes; infants who had cord stripping had a longer P wave, PR, and QTC interval suggesting an increased right preload when compared with infants who had early clamping of the cord (17). This may explain why milking may promote earlier onset of breathing compared with DCC. In a pilot study comparing 60 s of delay with milking of the intact cord 4 times, more infants breathed before cord clamping with UCM compared with DCC (74 vs. 53%; (30). While repeat cord milking may allow some back flow of blood toward the placenta via the umbilical arteries, this also allows the afterload of the left ventricle to remain low while blood is being infused after each milking. The majority of cord milking trials have employed milking the cord before clamping which have demonstrated benefits in blood pressure, IVH, BPD and death (7).
Figure 1. Beneficial effects of umbilical cord milking in non-vigorous newborns (Satyan Lakshminrusimha, UC Davis, copyright).
Cord Management in Infants That Need Resuscitation
Neonates requiring resuscitation may benefit from more blood returning to the body immediately after birth. It has been suggested that fetal blood volume loss to the placenta may occur as the infant descends into the birth canal when shoulder dystocia or with a tight nuchal cord occur (35, 36). This may be related to the squeeze of the infant as it traverses the tight birth canal, which places pressure on the umbilical cord. Within the cord, the muscular-walled, high-pressure arteries continue to move blood from the fetus to the placenta, while return flow from the placenta to the fetus in the thin-walled vein is diminished. This results in a net transfer of blood volume from the fetus to the placenta during birth (35).
The umbilical cord management currently recommended for infants that are non-vigorous (limp, pale and not breathing) and/or need resuscitation at birth is to immediately clamp (ICC) the umbilical cord (37). When ICC occurs, approximately 20 to 40 percent of the fetal-placental blood volume remains in the placenta (38, 39). This significant volume of fetal blood left in the placenta after ICC may further compromise neonatal transition and cardiac output resulting in lowered cerebral blood flow and tissue hypoxia, which can contribute to brain ischemia, multi-organ damage, or death (38, 40, 41). Immediate clamping may also be associated with bradycardia, increased pulmonary artery pressure with resulting right to left shunt, decreased in cardiac output, a surge in carotid artery pressure, all of which may contribute to increased NICU morbidity and mortality (32, 42).
The lack of studies in non-vigorous newborns has been identified as a major knowledge gap by the American Congress of Obstetricians & Gynecologists (ACOG), which states, “infants requiring resuscitation may benefit considerably from placental transfusion, but their need for immediate attention raises questions about whether they should undergo immediate or delayed umbilical cord clamping and whether umbilical cord milking (UCM) may offer a unique benefit” (43). UCM provides a replacement cardiac preload before the placenta is removed from the circulation and increases blood volume, which may improve cardiac output and increase pulmonary and cerebral circulation, thus mitigating further ischemia in an already compromised infant (16). For infants requiring immediate resuscitation at birth, neither of the methods currently practiced in all other infants to facilitating a placental transfusion, UCM or DCC, are recommended (43).
Ventilation During Delayed Cord Clamping
While several studies have demonstrated that resuscitating infants with an intact cord is feasible, much more research, training, pre-planning, and coordination are necessary as DCC is a challenge to perform at the mother's bedside (44–47). A recent survey of the practice of using a mobile resuscitation trolley at the bedside, demonstrated that half the perinatal providers expressed concern (48). Logistical issues such as space management, and accessibility to the patient for resuscitation were reported. Larger multicenter studies (VenFirst, NCT02742454) are attempting to better answer the question about the generalizability and benefit of ventilation with an intact cord.
Concerns Related to Umbilical Cord Milking
All available trials in human infants comparing UCM to ICC or DCC report no adverse effect of milking. Recent neurodevelopmental follow-up studies of preterm infants reported higher or similar cognitive and language scores with UCM compared to DCC at birth (29, 49). However, these trials were limited by small sample size, especially of extremely preterm infants. Recent animal data from preterm lambs demonstrates swings in carotid artery pressure and flow with umbilical cord milking (50). Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks) have a highly vascularized germinal matrix which may be prone to bleeding if these rapid fluctuations are occurring in human infants with cord milking. The exact physiological impact of UCM on neonatal adaptation still needs more clarification. Future studies are needed to further evaluate the acute effects of cord milking on the hemodynamics in human pregnancies. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in 2015 stated that the long-term safety profile is still unknown, and thus recommended against the routine use of UCM in newborns <29 weeks gestation (4).
Conclusions
Currently, some centers are using cord milking as their exclusive standard of care based on reduction in morbidities such as death and IVH after implementation of cord milking (51, 52). A recent survey of obstetricians and perinatologists in the United States reported 38.9 percent of obstetrical providers use umbilical cord milking, and in infants that need resuscitation 25 percent use umbilical cord milking (53). Thus, there is an urgent need for high quality evidence to compare the use of UCM to ICC in infants that need resuscitation. Two recent trials from India demonstrated that it is feasible to study term and preterm who are depressed at birth (54, 55). We need to determine if umbilical cord milking provides a superior placental transfusion and improves neonatal outcomes compared to current approaches. Two ongoing large multinational multicenter randomized trials (NCT03019367, NCT03631940) will provide evidence as to whether UCM is beneficial in preterm infants and infants that need resuscitation.
Author Contributions
AK wrote the initial version of the manuscript and approves the final version as it is submitted.
Funding
These ongoing and previously mentioned studies by the author are funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grants (R21HD080594, R03HD072934, R01HD096023, R01HD088646).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1. Mcdonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2013) 9:303–97. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3
2. Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L, Seidler AL, Hunter K, Lui K, et al. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2018) 218:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.231
3. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Guidelines on Basic Newborn Resuscitation. Geneva: World Health Organization (2012).
4. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R, et al. Part 7: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations (Reprint). Pediatrics (2015) 136 (Suppl. 2):S120–66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3373D
5. Mercer JE-OD, Vohr B, Tucker R, Oh W, Padbury J. Delayed Cord Clamping at Birth Improves Motor Scores at 18 to 22 Months Corrected Age: A Randomized Controlled Trial. San Diego: Pediatric Academic Society (2015).
6. Tarnow-Mordi W, Morris J, Kirby A, Robledo K, Askie L, Brown R, et al. Delayed versus immediate cord clamping in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:2445–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711281
7. Al-Wassia H, Shah PS. Efficacy and safety of umbilical cord milking at birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. (2015) 169:18–25. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1906
8. Erickson-Owens DA, Mercer JS, Oh W. Umbilical cord milking in term infants delivered by cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. (2012) 32:580–4. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.159
9. Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Parihar R, Garg A, Gupta A, Chawla D, et al. Effect of umbilical cord milking in term and near term infants: randomized control trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2013) 208:120.e121–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.884
10. Bora R, Akhtar SS, Venkatasubramaniam A, Wolfson J, Rao R. Effect of 40-cm segment umbilical cord milking on hemoglobin and serum ferritin at 6 months of age in full-term infants of anemic and non-anemic mothers. J Perinatol. (2015) 35:832–6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.92
11. Jaiswal P, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Chaudhary H, Tandon A. Comparison of umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping on cerebral blood flow in term neonates. Indian J Pediatr. (2015) 82:890–5. doi: 10.1007/s12098-015-1734-2
12. Yadav AK, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Dubey K, Mandal U, Yadav CP. Comparison of three types of intervention to enhance placental redistribution in term newborns: randomized control trial. J Perinatol. (2015) 35:720–4. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.65
13. Siddall RS, Crissey RR, Knapp WL. Effect on cesarean section babies of stripping or milking of the umbilical cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (1952) 63:1059–64. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(52)90546-2
14. Siddall RS, Richardson RP. Milking or stripping the umbilical cord; effect on vaginally delivered babies. Obstet Gynecol. (1953) 1:230–3.
15. Colozzi AE. Clamping of the umbilical cord; its effect on the placental transfusion. N Engl J Med. (1954) 250:629–32.
16. Whipple GA, Sisson TR, Lund CJ. Delayed ligation of the umbilical cord; its influence on the blood volume of the newborn. Obstet Gynecol. (1957) 10:603–10. doi: 10.1097/00006250-195712000-00002
17. Walsh SZ. Early clamping versus stripping of card: comparative study of electrocardiogram in neonatal period. Br Heart J. (1969) 31:122–6.
18. Hosono S, Mugishima H, Fujita H, Hosono A, Okada T, Takahashi S, et al. Blood pressure and urine output during the first 120 h of life in infants born at less than 29 weeks' gestation related to umbilical cord milking. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2009) 94:F328–31. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.142935
19. March MI, Hacker MR, Parson AW, Modest AM, De Veciana M. The effects of umbilical cord milking in extremely preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. (2013) 33:763–7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.70
20. Alan S, Arsan S, Okulu E, Akin IM, Kilic A, Taskin S, et al. Effects of umbilical cord milking on the need for packed red blood cell transfusions and early neonatal hemodynamic adaptation in preterm infants born < / = 1500 g: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2014) 36:e493–8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000143
21. Katheria AC, Leone TA, Woelkers D, Garey DM, Rich W, Finer NN. The effects of umbilical cord milking on hemodynamics and neonatal outcomes in premature neonates. J Pediatr. (2014) 164:1045–50.e1041. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.024
22. Song SY, Kim Y, Kang BH, Yoo HJ, Lee M. Safety of umbilical cord milking in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. (2017) 60:527–34. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.6.527
23. Daskalakis G, Papapanagiotou A, Siristatidis C, Drakakis P, Mole I, Barbouni A, et al. The influence of delayed cord clamping and cord milking on inflammatory cytokines in umbilical vein and neonatal circulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2018) 97:624–8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13294
24. El-Naggar W, Simpson D, Hussain A, Armson A, Dodds L, Warren A, et al. Cord milking versus immediate clamping in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2018). doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314757
25. Lago Leal V, Pamplona Bueno L, Cabanillas Vilaplana L, Nicolas Montero E, Martin Blanco M, Fernandez Romero C, et al. Effect of milking maneuver in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Fetal Diagn Ther. (2018). doi: 10.1159/000485654. [Epub ahead of print].
26. Li J, Yu B, Wang W, Luo D, Dai QL, Gan XQ. Does intact umbilical cord milking increase infection rates in preterm infants with premature prolonged rupture of membranes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2018). doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1487947. [Epub ahead of print].
27. Kumar B, Upadhyay A, Gothwal S, Jaiswal V, Joshi P, Dubey K. Umbilical cord milking and hematological parameters in moderate to late preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. (2015) 52:753–7. doi: 10.1007/s13312-015-0711-1
28. Rabe H, Jewison A, Alvarez RF, Crook D, Stilton D, Bradley R, et al. Milking compared with delayed cord clamping to increase placental transfusion in preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. (2011) 117:205–11. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fe46ff
29. Katheria A, Garey D, Truong G, Akshoomoff N, Steen J, Maldonado M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of umbilical cord milking vs delayed cord clamping in preterm infants: neurodevelopmental outcomes at 22–26 months of corrected age. J Pediatr. (2017) 194:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.037
30. Katheria AC, Truong G, Cousins L, Oshiro B, Finer NN. Umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in preterm infants. Pediatrics (2015) 136:61–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0368
31. Hogberg U, Hakansson S, Serenius F, Holmgren PA. Extremely preterm cesarean delivery: a clinical study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2006) 85:1442–7. doi: 10.1080/00016340600969366
32. Ersdal HL, Linde J, Mduma E, Auestad B, Perlman J. Neonatal outcome following cord clamping after onset of spontaneous respiration. Pediatrics (2014) 134:265–72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0467
33. Hooper SB, Binder-Heschl C, Polglase GR, Gill AW, Kluckow M, Wallace EM, et al. The timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth: physiological considerations. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. (2016) 2:4. doi: 10.1186/s40748-016-0032-y
34. Katheria A, Blank D, Rich W, Finer N. Umbilical cord milking improves transition in premature infants at birth. PLoS ONE (2014) 9:e94085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094085
35. Mercer J, Erickson-Owens D, Skovgaard R. Cardiac asystole at birth: is hypovolemic shock the cause? Med Hypotheses (2009) 72:458–63. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2008.11.019
36. Menticoglou S, Schneider C. Resuscitating the baby after shoulder dystocia. Case Rep Obstetr Gynecol. (2016) 2016:8674167. doi: 10.1155/2016/8674167
37. American Academy of Pediatrics and American Heart Association. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP). 7th ed. Chicago, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics (2016).
38. Yao AC, Moinian M, Lind J. Distribution of blood between infant and placenta after birth. Lancet (1969) 2:871–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(69)92328-9
39. Farrar D, Airey R, Law GR, Tuffnell D, Cattle B, Duley L. Measuring placental transfusion for term births: weighing babies with cord intact. BJOG (2011) 118:70–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02781.x
40. Arcilla RA, Oh W, Lind J, Gessner IH. Pulmonary arterial pressures of newborn infants born with early and late clamping of the cord. Acta Paediatr Scand. (1966) 55:305–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1966.tb17659.x
41. Oh W, Lind J. Body temperature of the newborn infant in relation to placental transfusion. Acta Paediatr Scand. (1967) 56:137–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1967.tb15289.x
42. Bhatt S, Polglase GR, Wallace EM, Te Pas AB, Hooper SB. Ventilation before umbilical cord clamping improves the physiological transition at birth. Front Pediatr. (2014) 2:113. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00113
43. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 684: delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 129:e5–10. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001860
44. Thomas MR, Yoxall CW, Weeks AD, Duley L. Providing newborn resuscitation at the mother's bedside: assessing the safety, usability and acceptability of a mobile trolley. BMC Pediatr. (2014) 14:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-135
45. Katheria A, Poeltler D, Durham J, Steen J, Rich W, Arnell K, et al. Neonatal resuscitation with an intact cord: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. (2016) 178:75–80.e73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.053
46. Katheria AC, Brown MK, Faksh A, Hassen KO, Rich W, Lazarus D, et al. Delayed cord clamping in newborns born at term at risk for resuscitation: a feasibility randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. (2017) 187:313–7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.04.033
47. Winter J, Kattwinkel J, Chisholm C, Blackman A, Wilson S, Fairchild K. Ventilation of preterm infants during delayed cord clamping (VentFirst): a pilot study of feasibility and safety. Am J Perinatol. (2017) 34:111–6. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584521
48. Katheria AC, Sorkhi SR, Hassen K, Faksh A, Ghorishi Z, Poeltler D. Acceptability of bedside resuscitation with intact umbilical cord to clinicians and patients' families in the United States. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6:100. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00100
49. Rabe H, Sawyer A, Amess P, Ayers S. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 and 3.5 years for very preterm babies enrolled in a randomized trial of milking the umbilical cord versus delayed cord clamping. Neonatology (2016) 109:113–9. doi: 10.1159/000441891
50. Blank DA, Polglase GR, Kluckow M, Gill AW, Crossley KJ, Moxham A, et al. Haemodynamic effects of umbilical cord milking in premature sheep during the neonatal transition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2017) 103:F539–46. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314005
51. Schmid MB, Reister F, Mayer B, Hopfner RJ, Fuchs H, Hummler HD. Prospective risk factor monitoring reduces intracranial hemorrhage rates in preterm infants. Dtsch Arztebl Int. (2013) 110:489–96. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0489
52. Patel S, Clark EA, Rodriguez CE, Metz TD, Abbaszadeh M, Yoder BA. Effect of umbilical cord milking on morbidity and survival in extremely low gestational age neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2014) 211:519.e511–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.037
53. Leslie MS, Greene J, Schulkin J, Jelin AC. Umbilical cord clamping practices of U.S. obstetricians. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. (2018) 11:51–60. doi: 10.3233/NPM-181729
54. Girish M, Jain V, Dhokane R, Gondhali SB, Vaidya A, Aghai ZH. Umbilical cord milking for neonates who are depressed at birth: a randomized trial of feasibility. J Perinatol. (2018) 38:1190–6. doi: 10.1038/s41372-018-0161-4
Keywords: placental transfusion, umbilical cord milking, delayed cord clamping, resuscitation, neonates
Citation: Katheria AC (2018) Umbilical Cord Milking: A Review. Front. Pediatr. 6:335. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00335
Received: 31 August 2018; Accepted: 16 October 2018;
Published: 13 November 2018.
Edited by:
Michael P. Meyer, Middlemore Hospital, New ZealandReviewed by:
Georg Schmolzer, University of Alberta, CanadaJeroen van Vonderen, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Netherlands
Copyright © 2018 Katheria. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anup C. Katheria, Anup.Katheria@sharp.com