Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Public Health, 23 April 2015
Sec. Epidemiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Health Care Financing and Affordability in the Emerging Global Markets View all 23 articles

Growing Burden of Non-Communicable Diseases in the Emerging Health Markets: The Case of BRICS

  • 1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia

Historical Perspective on Non-Communicable Diseases Worldwide

The blooming of incidence and prevalence of “prosperity diseases” among the broad layers of modern day populations is rather novel phenomenon in demographic history of the human race (1). Illnesses such as obesity (2), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular consequences of atherosclerosis, renal insufficiency, mental disorders, and even cancer are closely related to the increased longevity of most contemporary societies (3). In previous centuries, they were mostly reserved for elite social groups enjoying rather luxurious life style. Vast majority of citizens of the time were living in rural communities on the verge of poverty. Their structure of morbidity even in Europe until late 19th century was dominated by burden of infectious diseases and injury while neonatal and maternal mortality rates were huge. Industrial revolution led to the growth of living standards, invention of vaccines, and antibiotics, and ultimately development of organized publicly funded health systems. The prominent European health policy makers in the 19th century properly believed that effective public health measures will diminish huge burden of infectious diseases. Consecutively, they expected that overall costs of medical care provision should decrease substantially and ultimately reach plateau level. This second step turned out to be a great miscalculation and a surprise. Like no time in written past, people began living longer and healthier lives. But it happened at the cost. Simultaneously, from many industrialized nations, evidence were accumulating of accelerated occurrence of non-communicable diseases. Accomplishment of evidence-based medicine succeeded to control many of these initially incurable diseases, thereby transforming them into life time disorders as in the typical cases of diabetes and terminal renal insufficiency. Acute bacterial infections, dominating morbidity in the old days, were usually successfully treated within few weeks. Unlike these, chronic illnesses were bringing long-term burden for both the patients and the society. Malignant disorders with its complex treatment strategies present particularly demanding medical conditions. Cancer leaves permanent footprint in a life of a patient in terms of poor survival rates, decreased life quality, and working ability.

Non-Communicable Diseases Expansion in Developing Countries

The ultimate demographic transition consisting of ascending portion of elderly, falling fertility rates, and bold growth of median age within contemporary nations became broadly recognized as population aging (4). Most of this transformation of morbidity and mortality structure happened in rich industrial countries of Western Europe, North America, and Japan many decades ago. The same pattern of population aging associated with huge incidence and prevalence rates of major non-communicable diseases repeated on wider scale much later in developing countries. The worldwide transformation of public health landscape to the large extent is attributable to the accelerated pace of globalization after the end of Cold War era (5). Particularly interesting, current developments belong to the economies responsible for most of global growth that are recognized as the emerging markets. The countries whose reshaped structure of morbidity is most likely to affect global health in the future are definitely the BRICS [Brazil (6), Russia, India, China, South Africa] (7). BRICS’s far extended long-term influence in health arena worldwide will be related to their mammoth sized populations. Their increased domestic demand for medical technologies and medicines is already shaping investment strategies of major pharmaceutical and medicinal device industries. Another significant issue is their bold foreign medical assistance programs particularly targeted for emerging markets of Sudanese Africa, Latin America, Central and South East Asia (8). These leading countries are closely followed by a set of smaller scale economies mostly marked as N-11 (Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, South Korea, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, the Philippines, Turkey, and Vietnam) (9). Very similar process is simultaneously taking place in dynamically developing Southern (10) and South-East Asian (11), Latin American, Eastern European (12), and Arab speaking MENA region (13). Eradication of poverty currently taking place in these regions is coupled with changed dietary habits (14) (higher salt and fat and lower carbohydrate intake), wide spread tobacco abuse, and sedentary life styles (15). The mentioned factors contributing to the growing burden of non-communicable diseases. It became obvious that contribution of emerging markets and Third World countries to the global economic burden of NCDs will grow further. It will, highly, likely, soon have greater share than the one of established mature market economies (16). As basic assumption of most forecasts remains the fact that such growth will be dominated by developments in China (17) and India (18). High toll of this unfortunate change for developing countries is coupled impact of communicable and non-communicable diseases (19). At the same time, many national health systems throughout Asia and beyond expose poor responsiveness to the NCDs related population needs. There seems to be serious barriers in access to medical care and its affordability to the ordinary citizens.

The increasing awareness on approaching of almost unbearable burden of NCDs (20) led to the high profile United Nations meeting on the subject in 2011 (21). Such UN gatherings are so uncommon on health related topics that it happened only once in past due to AIDS. NCDs recognized as the core global health challenges were cardiovascular disorders, cancer, diabetes, and chronic respiratory illness. These changes are beginning to profoundly change the landscape of even the poorest countries around the globe. So far, NCDs have already overarched burden of infectious diseases and injury in terms of disability adjusted life years, as well as work load and economic burden to the most national health sectors (22).

Promising Cost-Effective Solutions for the Future

The blossoming of prosperity disease did not happen suddenly. It was a consequence of long chain of evolutionary events in civil society development. We will mention only some of them such as technological revolution, improved housing conditions, sanitation and sewage disposal, public health successes in eradication of major infectious diseases, policy efforts to tackle hunger and starvation among the world’s poor, and ultimately tobacco (23) and alcohol abuse (24). As its preconditions took so long to be created, it is unlikely that we shall be able to tackle NCD’s burden effectively in near future. Rich countries as well as developing ones concluded that orchestrated efforts will be needed in the international arena. World Health Organization has adopted a package of measures, whose implementation and progress are being monitored (25), broadly known as “Global coordination mechanisms on NCDs” (26). As most cost-effective and feasible measures were identified, control of tobacco consumption to the targeted 5% consumers worldwide until 2025 and reduction of salt intake by general populations of at least 15% in the order of significance. These interventions that were named “best buy” solutions offering best attainable compromise between the need for investment and outcomes that will be gained (27). Promotion of active life style and healthy diet, as well as other preventive and screening measures, comes at the second place. If such efforts are followed closely by national authorities, WHO expects that these measures should achieve 25% reduction of NCD attributable premature mortality until 2025 (28). Many of the proposed strategies were previously tested within a sound methodological framework applied on a second largest emerging market of the America, Mexico (29).

The most challenging issue for the emerging markets’ health systems appears to be universal health coverage (30). These systems were built up on diverse historical legacies and should find each one its own way to handle the upcoming pressure of prosperity diseases coupled with accelerated population aging. Profound transformation of current network of medical facilities in Third World countries, as well as human capacity building, will be forced to move priority from acute care toward complex, chronic illnesses (31).

Growing Burden of NCDs Coincided with Increasing Health Expenditures

As witnessed by current WHO estimates given in Table 1, we may see that overall burden of non-communicable disease has consolidated in some countries such as Russia recording even slight decrease over the past decade. Nevertheless, leading emerging markets of China and India followed by a large distance in absolute terms by Brazil and South Africa exhibited clear pattern of increasing burden of NCDs expressed in terms of Years of Life Lost, Years Lost due to Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life Year (DALY). According to WHO, NCDs attributable mortality increased substantially among the same four countries with notable promising exception of Russia. Russian partial success in containing but not decreasing toll of prosperity diseases over 2000–2012 observation period might be attributable to the strong public health legacy of Soviet era as well as reform policies implemented in recent past (32). The rates of hospital discharges increased substantially in the emerging markets across the globe following the increased presence of NCDs in the overall morbidity and mortality structure. This was mainly the case with clinical admissions that could be attributed to the malignant disorders (33) and circulatory diseases (34), followed by chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (35) and diabetes (36). National level spending on medicines indicated to treat these conditions followed at the same pace, so entire regional pharmaceutical markets adjusted to these changes as was the case in South Eastern Europe (37). Extensive presence of chronic prosperity illnesses supported stronger demand for medical imaging (38), laboratory testing (39), outpatient visits, prescription and dispensing of novel pharmaceuticals (40), surgical, radiation oncology (41), and rehabilitation services. These phenomena were relying on strengthened civil expectations for advanced medical technologies supported by growing living standards and domestic consumption in BRICS markets. If we take into account serious challenge of home-based care for the disabled and growing portion of elderly citizens with special needs, bold growth of national health expenditures should have been predicted (42). China is absolutely leading in terms of purchase power parity of its health spending. Huge lag of all other major emerging economies behind People’s Republic of China is most obvious when compared to the India, rapidly developing nation of a similar population size.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Non-communicable diseases burden-related indicators; WHO estimates for BRICS in 2000 and 2012; total health expenditure and out-of-pocket health expenditure in terms of current international $ purchase power parity basis (source: Global Health Expenditure Database).

Catastrophic household expenditure presents particularly crucial issue throughout the countries of Sudanese Africa with very low incomes, whose medical care is dominantly supported by out-of-pocket spending (43). This happens due to absence of strong national health insurance funds whose revenues would come out of mandatory taxation supported by governmental and external financial sources. Huge, occasionally sevenfold growth of out-of-patient expenditure is clearly visible among the top BRICS markets. Such socioeconomic vulnerability seriously affects the poor members of the community. This might be the crucial issue for long-term affordability (44) of medical care to the ordinary citizens because almost all of the emerging markets own massive rural populations. Urbanization process, which began in Europe in 18th century, is still rapidly evolving throughout Asia, Africa, and Latin America (45). Extensive development of medical facilities network covering remote areas will remain one of the key difficulties for national governments. This is worsened by inevitable concentration of most professional staff in large cities with much more rewarding personal career opportunities. The primary goal for the future of these health systems wiil be provision of accessible medical care. It should have decent quality supported by universal health insurance coverage and full reimbursement of at least essential medicines. The speed of economic growth, political stability, and effectiveness of health reforms remain highly diverse among the top 20 emerging markets. Some global forecasting agencies as well as international financial organizations were pointing out that some smaller scale N-11 economies were top performers on some criteria. Nevertheless, the prevailing consensus is that BRICS (46) health care markets will inevitably outpace all others and remain well ahead of their competition shaping the global health challenges in the first half of 21st century.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia has funded this study through Grant OI 175014. Publication of results was not contingent to Ministry’s censorship or approval.

References

1. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press (2004).

Google Scholar

2. Chopra M, Galbraith S, Darnton-Hill I. A global response to a global problem: the epidemic of overnutrition. Bull World Health Organ (2002) 80(12):952–8.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Jakovljevic M, Laaser U. Long term population aging 1950-2010 in seventeen transition countries in the wider region of South East Europe. SEEJPH (2015) 3. doi: 10.12908/SEEJPH-2014-42

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ogura S, Jakovljevic M. Health financing constrained by population aging – an opportunity to learn from Japanese experience. Ser J Exp Clin Res (2014) 15:175–81. doi:10.2478/SJECR

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Beaglehole R, Yach D. Globalisation and the prevention and control of non-communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adults. Lancet (2003) 362(9387):903–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14335-8

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Menezes AM, Monteiro CA, Barreto SM, Chor D, et al. Chronic non-communicable diseases in Brazil: burden and current challenges. Lancet (2011) 377(9781):1949–61. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60135-9

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jakovljevic MB. The key role of the leading emerging BRIC markets in the future of global health care. Ser J Exp Clin Res (2014) 15(3):139–43. doi:10.5937/sjecr1403139J

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Watt NF, Gomez EJ, McKee M. Global health in foreign policy – and foreign policy in health? Evidence from the BRICS. Health Policy Plan (2013) 2013:1–11. doi:10.1093/heapol/czt063

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Goldman S, Bloomberg. Goldman Sachs’s MIST Topping BRICs as Smaller Markets Outperform. Available from: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-07/goldman-sachs-s-mist-topping-brics-as-smaller-markets-outperform.html

Google Scholar

10. Ghaffar A, Reddy KS, Singhi M. Burden of non-communicable diseases in South Asia. BMJ (2004) 328(7443):807–10. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7443.807

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Dans A, Ng N, Varghese C, Tai ES, Firestone R, Bonita R. The rise of chronic non-communicable diseases in Southeast Asia: time for action. Lancet (2011) 377(9766):680–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61506-1

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Jakovljevic MB. Resource allocation strategies in Southeastern European health policy. Eur J Health Econ (2013) 14(2):153–9. doi:10.1007/s10198-012-0439-y

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rahim A, Sibai A, Khader Y, Hwalla N, Fadhil I, Alsiyabi H, et al. Non-communicable diseases in the Arab world. Lancet (2014) 383(9914):356–67. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62383-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Popkin BM, Horton S, Kim S, Mahal A, Shuigao J. Trends in diet, nutritional status, and diet-related noncommunicable diseases in China and India: the economic costs of the nutrition transition. Nutr Rev (2001) 59(12):379–90. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06967.x

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kumagai N, Ogura S. Persistence of physical activity in middle age: a nonlinear dynamic panel approach. Eur J Health Econ (2014) 15(7):717–35. doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0518-8

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bloom DE, Cafiero E, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom LR, Fathima S, et al. The global economic burden of noncommunicable diseases (No. 8712). Program on the Global Demography of Aging (2012). Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/gdm/wpaper/8712.html

Google Scholar

17. Yang G, Kong L, Zhao W, Wan X, Zhai Y, Chen LC, et al. Emergence of chronic non-communicable diseases in China. Lancet (2008) 372(9650):1697–705. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61366-5

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mahal A, Karan A, Engelgau M. The Economic Implications of Non-Communicable Disease for India. Washington, DC: World Bank (2010). Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.com/handle/10986/13649 [License: CC BY 3.0 Unported]

Google Scholar

19. Boutayeb A. The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg (2006) 100(3):191–9. doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.07.021

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Alwan A. Global Status Report on Non-Communicable Diseases 2010. World Health Organization (2011). Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report_full_en.pdf

Google Scholar

21. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Alleyne G, Horton R, Li L, Lincoln P, et al. UN high-level meeting on non-communicable diseases: addressing four questions. Lancet (2011) 378(9789):449–55. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60879-9

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Gwatkin DR, Guillot M, Heuveline P. The burden of disease among the global poor. Lancet (1999) 354(9178):586–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02108-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lee K, Chagas LC, Novotny TE. Brazil and the framework convention on tobacco control: global health diplomacy as soft power. PLoS Med (2010) 7(4):e1000232. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000232

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Jakovljevic MB, Jovanovic M, Nikic K, Dejanovic SD, Radovanovi A, Pirkovic I, et al. Acute alcohol detoxification costs in upper-middle income: Western Balkans. J Health Behav Public Health (2011) 1(2):1–7.

Google Scholar

25. Alwan A, MacLean DR, Riley LM, d’Espaignet ET, Mathers CD, Stevens GA, et al. Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: progress and capacity in high-burden countries. Lancet (2010) 376(9755):1861–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61853-3

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. WHO Global Coordination. Mechanism on the Prevention and Control of NCDs. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/ncd-coordination-mechanism/background/en/

Google Scholar

27. Revill P, Sculpher M. Cost effectiveness of interventions to tackle non-communicable diseases. BMJ (2012) 344:e609. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7883

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Cerqueira MT, Cravioto A, Dianis N, Ghannem H, Levitt N, Yan N, et al. Global response to non-communicable disease. BMJ (2011) 342:d3823. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3823

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Salomon JA, Carvalho N, Gutiérrez-Delgado C, Orozco R, Mancuso A, Hogan DR, et al. Intervention strategies to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases in Mexico: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ (2012) 344:e614. doi:10.1136/bmj.e355

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Rodin J, de Ferranti D. Universal health coverage: the third global health transition? Lancet (2012) 380(9845):861–2. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61340-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Allotey P, Reidpath DD, Yasin S, Chan CK, de-Graft Aikins A. Rethinking health-care systems: a focus on chronicity. Lancet (2011) 377(9764):450–1. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61856-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Boytsov S, Potemkina RA. Perspectives: preventive measures for public health in Russian Federation. Eur Heart J (2014) 16(Suppl A):A84–6. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/sut018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Jakovljevic M, Gutzwiller F, Schwenkglenks M, Milovanovic O, Rancic N, Varjacic M, et al. Costs differences among monoclonal antibodies-based first-line oncology cancer protocols for breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J BUON (2014) 19(3):1111–20.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Sposato LA, Esnaola MM, Zamora R, Zurrú MC, Fustinoni O, Saposnik G. Quality of ischemic stroke care in emerging countries the Argentinian National Stroke Registry (ReNACer). Stroke (2008) 39(11):3036–41. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.521062

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lazic Z, Gajovıc O, Tanaskovic I, Milovanovic D, Atanasijevic D, Jakovljevic MB. GOLD stage impact on COPD direct medical costs in elderly. J Health Behav Public Health (2012) 2(3):1–7.

Google Scholar

36. Biorac N, Jakovljević MB, Stefanović D, Perović S, Janković S. Assessment of diabetes mellitus type 2 treatment costs in the Republic of Serbia. Vojnosanit Pregl (2009) 66(4):271–6. doi:10.2298/VSP0904271B

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Jakovljevic M, Djordjevic N, Jurisevic M, Jankovic S. Evolution of Serbian pharmaceutical market alongside socioeconomic transition. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res (2015) 15(3):1–10. doi:10.1586/14737167.2015.1003044

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ranković A, Rančić N, Jovanović M, Ivanović M, Gajović O, Lazić Z, et al. Impact of imaging diagnostics on the budget: are we spending too much? Vojnosanit Pregl (2013) 70(7):709–11.

Google Scholar

39. Jakovljević M, Ranković A, Rančić N, Jovanović M, Ivanović M, Gajović O, et al. Radiology services costs and utilization patterns estimates in Southeastern Europe – a retrospective analysis from Serbia. Value Health Reg Issues (2013) 2(2):218–25. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2013.07.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Jakovljevic MB. Oncology monoclonal antibodies expenditure trends and reimbursement projections in the emerging Balkan market. Farmeconomia Health Econ Ther Pathw (2014) 15(1):27–32. doi:10.7175/fe.v15i1.909

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Jakovljevic M, Zugic A, Rankovic A, Dagovic A. Radiation therapy remains the key cost driver of oncology inpatient treatment. J Med Econ (2015) 18(1):29–36. doi:10.3111/13696998.2014.971162

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jakovljevic MB. Health expenditure dynamics in Serbia 1995-2012. Hosp Pharmacol (2014) 1(3):180–3.

Google Scholar

43. Wang Q, Brenner S, Leppert G, Banda TH, Kalmus O, De Allegri M. Health seeking behaviour and the related household out-of-pocket expenditure for chronic non-communicable diseases in rural Malawi. Health Policy Plan (2015) 30(2):242–52. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu004

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Jakovljevic MB, Jovanovic M, Lesch OM. Accessibility and affordability of alcohol dependency medical care in Serbia. Front Psychiatry (2014) 5:192. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00192

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. McGranahan G, Martine G. Urbanization and Development: Policy Lessons from the BRICS Experience. London (2012). Available from: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/10622IIED.pdf

Google Scholar

46. Kickbusch I. BRICS’ contributions to the global health agenda. Bull World Health Organ (2014) 92(6):463–4. doi:10.2471/BLT.13.127944

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: health care, non-communicable disease, financing, sustainability, emerging market, BRICS, N-11

Citation: Jakovljevic MB and Milovanovic O (2015) Growing burden of non-communicable diseases in the emerging health markets: the case of BRICS. Front. Public Health 3:65. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00065

Received: 18 February 2015; Accepted: 06 April 2015;
Published: 23 April 2015

Edited by:

Kyriakos Souliotis, University of Peloponnese, Greece

Reviewed by:

Jinbing (Bing) Bai, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
Folkert De Groot, ToendersdeGroot B.V., Netherlands

Copyright: © 2015 Jakovljevic and Milovanovic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mihajlo B. Jakovljevic sidartagothama@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.