Next Article in Journal
Postmortem Cardiopulmonary Pathology in Patients with COVID-19 Infection: Single-Center Report of 12 Autopsies from Lausanne, Switzerland
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT in Osteitis Fibrosa Cystica Generalisata
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/diagnostics11081356
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PTH-rP and PTH-R1 Expression in Placentas from Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes: New Insights into the Pathophysiology of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy

by
Angelo Sirico
1,*,
Marco Dell’Aquila
2,
Linda Tartaglione
3,
Sascia Moresi
1,
Giorgia Farì
4,5,
Dario Pitocco
3,5,
Vincenzo Arena
2 and
Antonio Lanzone
1,5
1
Obstetrics and High-Risk Pregnancy Unit, Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
2
Pathology Unit, Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
3
Diabetology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
4
Institute of Biochemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
5
Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(8), 1356; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11081356
Submission received: 21 June 2021 / Revised: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 25 July 2021 / Published: 28 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: this study investigated the expression of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) and PTH/PTH-rP receptor PTH-R1 in placentas from women with gestational DM (GDM), and the relationship between PTH-R1 and PTH-rP expression and pregnancy characteristics. Methods: we prospectively enrolled 78 pregnant women with GDM, and immunochemistry for PTH-rP and PTH-R1 was performed on placentas. Patients were grouped according to the positivity of PTH-R1 or PTH-rP expression, and pregnancy characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results: PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression were highest in the extravillous cytotrophoblast and in the decidua. In extravillous cytotrophoblast, PTH-rP expression was higher in women with abnormal at fasting glycemia compared to women with abnormal 60′ or 120′ glycemia (25/25, 50% vs. 6/28, 21.4%, χ2 = 6.12, p = 0.01), and PTH-R1 expression was higher in women with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at fasting glycemia compared to women with abnormal 60′ or 120′ glycemia (37/50, 74% vs. 15/28, 53.6%, χ2 = 3.37, p = 0.06). In syncytiotrophoblast, PTH-rP-positive placentas were characterized by higher incidence of 1 min Apgar score < 7 (2/9, 22.2% vs. 2/69, 2.9%, χ2 = 6.11, p = 0.01) and maternal obesity (4/9, 44.4% vs. 11/69, 16.7%, χ2 = 3.81, p = 0.05). Conclusion: placental PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression is dependent on the type of maternal hyperglycemia, and it is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

1. Introduction

Diabetes represents a clinical challenge, especially in pregnant women, where it is crucial to monitor and assess both the maternal and the fetal wellbeing. Apart from women with pregestational diabetes (type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus or DM), a growing rate of women develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), considered as a glucose intolerance diagnosed for the first time in non-diabetic pregnant women and that typically resolves after delivery [1,2].
Specific risks of uncontrolled hyperglycemia in pregnancy include spontaneous abortion, pre-eclampsia, fetal demise, macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and hypocalcemia, among others [3,4].
Hyperglycemia in pregnancy is responsible for peculiar changes in the fetoplacental unit. Placentas from women with hyperglycemia are characterized by increased expression of glucose transporters (GLUT) GLUT1 and GLUT3 in the basal syncytiotrophoblast. In these cases, the placenta acts as a regulating glycemic buffer: once within the fetal circulation, glucose is used to cover acute fetal metabolic and energy demands [3]. The proportion of glucose that is not metabolized is then stored in various fetal tissues, predominantly the liver, heart, and skeletal muscle. When further glucose overload cannot be channeled into glycogen, the excess fetal glucose will then be taken up by the placental endothelium and metabolized, converting into glycogen. Furthermore, maternal hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia lead to an increased tissue oxygen consumption, which is responsible for a chronic hypoxemia in the fetoplacental unit and the subsequent upregulation of hormones (erythropoietin, fibroblast growth factor 2, Leptin, insulin-like growth 2) and inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor α) that may lead to placental neoangiogenesis and hypervascularization.
During human pregnancy, parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) and parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-rP receptors are produced by the uterus, placenta, fetal membranes (amnion and chorion), and developing fetus [4]. PTH-rP has important roles in fetal growth and development through stimulation of placental calcium transport, vasodilatation of the uteroplacental vasculature, and regulation of cellular growth and differentiation [5].
Studies in normal pregnancies have demonstrated that median PTH serum concentrations are statistically lower in early pregnancy compared to late pregnancy, while PTH-rP and corrected calcium levels are significantly higher in pregnant women than in nonpregnant women [6,7]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that type 2 diabetics presented higher serum PTH-rP levels than control subjects, and PTH-rP induces insulin expression in pancreatic β-cells [8,9]. However, the role of PTH and PTH-rP in pregnancies complicated by GDM still remains unclear.
Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of PTH-rP and PTH/PTH-rP receptor PTH-R1 in placentas from women with GDM and the relationship between PTH-R1 and PTH-rP expression and the obstetric outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

We prospectively enrolled pregnant women with a diagnosis of GDM who delivered in our center between February and May 2018. We included in our analysis singleton nondiabetic pregnant women who were diagnosed with GDM after a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24–28 weeks, according to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria [10]. Exclusion criteria were: presence of pregestational diabetes, chromosomal or congenital anomalies, abnormal first or second trimester ultrasound screening. Gestational age was assessed by last menstrual period, if in agreement of 7 days with crown-rump length dating using Robinson formula, or by CRL if there was more than 7 days discrepancy. For each patient, we collected the following data: maternal age, pregestational weight and body mass index (BMI), parity, presence of GDM in a previous pregnancy, insulin or diet therapy, pattern of abnormal OGTT (abnormal fasting or 1–2 h glycemia), third-trimester ultrasound-estimated fetal weight percentile for gestational week, gestational week at delivery, type of delivery, indication of caesarean section (CS) or operative vaginal delivery (OVD), neonatal sex, neonatal birthweight and birthweight percentile according to the gestational week, placental weight, fetoplacental weight ratio, presence of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), Apgar score, neonatal admission to NICU or neonatal ward.
After delivery, placentas from included women were sent for histopathological examination. Samples were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and, subsequently, sections were cut at 4 µm and subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin for routine histopathological examination. Afterwards, immunohistochemistry for PTH-rP and PTH-R1 was performed on 5 µm sections that were fixed on positively charged glass microscope slides. Sections were then deparaffinized in xylene, washed in ethanol at progressively lower concentration, and then washed with deionized water. Immunohistochemistry was performed with an anti-PTH-rP antibody and with an anti-PTH-R1 antibody. The anti-PTH-rP antibody (PTH-RP 1–34, rabbit, Yanaihara Institute, Sizuoka, Japan) was diluted at 1:100; the anti-PTH-R1 antibody (3d11 clone, mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz biotechnology Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) was diluted at 1:100. Antigen retrieval for both the antibodies was performed with high pH with the EnVision FLEX/HRP visualization system (Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). Both the hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, and those stained with the immunohistochemistry for PTH-rP and PTH-R1, were analyzed with an optical microscope by two expert pathologists in double blind.
Patients were grouped according to the positivity of PTH-R1 or PTH-rP expression in each placental layer, and maternal and ultrasound parameters were compared between the two groups. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to test for normality. When normally distributed, continuous variables were compared by Student’s t-test, otherwise by Kruskal–Wallis test; categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test. A p value <0.10 was considered as significant. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics v. 19 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Expression of Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein (PTH-rP) and PTH-R1 according to Placental Layers

We included in our analysis 78 patients matching the inclusion criteria. Maternal and ultrasound characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Among continuous variables, maternal age, neonatal birthweight, and placental weight showed a parametric distribution; pregestational weight and BMI, third-trimester ultrasound-estimated fetal weight percentile, gestational week at delivery, fetoplacental weight ratio, and neonatal birthweight percentile showed a nonparametric distribution. Immunochemistry analysis showed that PTH-rP expression was highest in the extravillous cytotrophoblast (31/78, 39%) and in the decidua (29/78, 37.2%) (Table 2). Similarly, PTH-R1 expression was highest in the extravillous cytotrophoblast (52/78, 66.7%) and in the decidua (58/78, 74.4%) (Figure 1). Mild expression of PTH-rP PTH-R1 was found in the villous cytotrophoblast and the syncytiotrophoblast, while no PTH-R1 positivity was found in the villous stroma (Figure 2).

3.2. Expression of PTH-rP and PTH-R1 according to Pregnancy Characteristics

In extravillous cytotrophoblast, we found a significant difference in the rate of PTH-rP expression in women with abnormal OGTT at fasting glycemia compared to women with abnormal 60′ or 120′ glycemia (25/50, 50% vs. 6/28, 21.4%, χ2 = 6.12, p = 0.01) (Figure 3 and Table S1). In extravillous cytotrophoblast, we also found that PTH-R1 expression was higher in women with abnormal OGTT at fasting glycemia compared to women with abnormal 60′ or 120′ glycemia (37/50, 74% vs. 15/28, 53.6%, χ2 = 3.37, p = 0.07) (Figure 4). PTH-R1 expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast was associated with lower median third-trimester ultrasound-estimated fetal weight percentile (55, IQR 48.75 vs. 79.5, IQR 28, p = 0.02) and lower mean fetoplacental weight ratio (5.71, SD 1.53 vs. 6.34, SD 1.20, p = 0.04) compared to PTH-R1-negative placentas (Table S2). Interestingly, 5/52 (9.6%) pregnancies with PTH-R1-positive placenta had urgent CS for non-reassuring CTG trace, while 0/26 (0%) pregnancies with PTH-R1-negative placenta had urgent CS for non-reassuring CTG trace, even if this difference did not reach significance (risk difference 9.6, p = 0.16).
In syncytiotrophoblast, we found that PTH-rP-positive placentas were characterized by higher incidence of neonatal Apgar score at 1 min < 7 (2/9, 22.2% vs. 2/69, 2.9%, χ2 = 6.11, p = 0.01) and maternal obesity (4/9, 44.4% vs. 11/69, 16.7%, χ2 = 3.81, p = 0.05) (Figure 4 and Table S3). In the syncytiotrophoblast, no differences in the maternal and neonatal variables were found according to the expression of PTH-R1 (Table S4). In the villous trophoblast and in the decidua, no differences in the maternal and neonatal variables were found according to the expression of PTH-rP or PTH-R1 (Tables S5–S8).

4. Discussion

Our results show that, in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes, PTH-rP and PTH-R1 are strongly expressed in extravillous cytotrophoblast and in the decidua, mildly expressed in the syncytiotrophoblast and in the villous cytotrophoblast, while no expression of these receptors was found in the villous stroma. Placental PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression in the extravillous cytotrophoblast is associated with increased incidence of maternal abnormal fasting glycemia at 24–28 weeks OGGT, PTH-R1 expression in the extravillous cytotrophoblast is associated with lower median third-trimester ultrasound-estimated fetal weight percentile and lower fetoplacental weight ratio, while PTH-rP expression in the syncytiotrophoblast is associated with higher incidence of maternal obesity and neonatal Apgar score at 1 min < 7.
PTH-rP was first identified in 1987 as a tumor product that had the ability to activate PTH receptors and cause hypercalcemia by increasing bone resorption and renal tubular resorption of calcium, with a phosphaturic action also, by interacting with a common PTH/PTH-rP receptor, now called type 1 PTH receptor or PTH-R1 [11,12]. In contrast to PTH, which is found only in the parathyroid glands, PTH-rP is found in many tissues in both fetuses and adults, including epithelia, mesenchymal tissues, the fetoplancental unit, endocrine glands, and the central nervous system. PTH is a circulating hormone that carries signals from a calcium sensor in the parathyroid glands to the target tissues, while PTH-rP is a local messenger within tissues [13]. Furthermore, PTH-rP is processed into at least three fragments, suggesting that it is a polyhormone, the precursor of multiple biologically active peptides. Recent findings show that PTH-rP can act, not only via the classical autocrine/paracrine pathways, but also through a so-called intracrine pathway, which involves the translocation of the nascent protein into the nucleus [14,15,16].
PTH-rP plays a crucial role in the regulation of calcium transport from the mother to the fetus through the placenta. The fetal skeleton mineralization and the calcium requirements for all the enzymatic processes in the fetal development explain the high demands of calcium during fetal growth. Therefore, a calcium gradient from the mother to the fetus is maintained through the syncytiotrophoblast via passive mechanisms, Na+/Ca2+ exchangers, and calcium binding proteins (CaBP), such as oncomodulin and S100-P, which were found in the placenta [17,18,19,20,21]. Many studies support the role of PTH-rP in the placental Ca2+ transport; a fragment of PTH-rP is most likely responsible for stimulating Ca2+ transport via PTH-R1, a G-protein-coupled receptor [15]. Interestingly, PTH-rP is also secreted by smooth muscle cells in vascular beds, responding to a stretching by relaxing smooth muscle locally with a vasorelaxant effect [22,23]. Macgill et al., in 1997, demonstrated that PTH-rP and PTH infusion in pre-constricted placental cotyledons induced a significative vasodilatation of fetoplacental vessels in vitro [24].
PTH-rP was also found to be a cytotrophoblast apoptosis survival factor; in cell culture from term human placentas, PTH-rP evoked a rescue of both TNFα/IFNγ and staurosporine-induced apoptosis, with a significantly reduced rate of apoptosis [25]. Animal models demonstrated that PTH-rP is expressed in mouse embryonic and extraembryonic tissues from the late morula stage onwards, in the trophoblast cells in early pregnancy, and in the developing trophoectoderm cell lineage [26]. A PTH-rP gene knockout murine model demonstrated that null-PTH-rP gene pregnancies are associated with reduced trophoblast giant cells, reduced fetal weight, and reduced placental amino acid transport [27]. Wlodeck et al. in 2004 studied the effect of PTH-rP infusion in spontaneous hypertensive rat (SHR) models and they demonstrated that exogenous administration of PTH-rP did not have any effect on fetal growth, while PTH/PTH-rP receptor antagonism induced an increase in endogenous PTH-rP, which mediated increased fetal growth, possibly via autocrine actions [28].
PTH-R1 is a G-protein-coupled receptor that binds PTH and PTH-rP with similar affinity and can activate several intracellular signaling pathways, including those involving cAMP and Ca2+. The immediate consequences of activating PTH-R1 differ between cell types, and even between studies of the same cell lines [29]. Authors have demonstrated that the renal and bone PTH-R1 expression is upregulated in vitamin-D-deficient rats and by endotoxin, interleukin-2, dexamethasone, T3, and TGF. On the contrary, PTH, PTH-rP, angiotensin-II, IGF-1, PGE2, vitamin D, and chronic renal failure decrease its expression [30].
Recently, the relationship between bone metabolism and the glucose metabolism perturbations has been described [31]. Impairment of the calcium–vitamin D–PTH axis has been shown in patients with diabetes. In 1992, Ishida et al. reported that type 2 diabetics presented higher serum PTH-rP levels than control subjects [32]. Extensive studies have demonstrated that an increase in the cytosolic calcium is essential for glucose-stimulated insulin release and that PTH-rP induces insulin expression in pancreatic β-cells [8,33]. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated the presence of insulin receptors INSR, IGF1R and IGF2R in the parathyroid tissue [34]. In 2007, Maghbooli et al. analyzed a cohort of 741 pregnancies and found that severe vitamin D deficiency (<25 nmol/L) was higher in women with a diagnosis of GDM compared to non-GDM women [35]. In contrast, recently Kramer et al. showed that vitamin D level was not associated with the insulin sensitivity or with the glucose tolerance status, but their data demonstrated a positive correlation between the prevalence of GDM with the increase of PTH levels [36].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a wide understanding of the placental PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression in pregnancies complicated by GDM and to evaluate the relationship between this expression and the maternal, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. Our data show that placental PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression are associated with peculiar pregnancy characteristics in the GDM patients. PTH-rP expression is associated with maternal elevated fasting glucose levels, maternal obesity, and Apgar score at 1 min < 7, while PTH-R1 is overexpressed in placentas from pregnancies with maternal elevated fasting glucose levels, lower ultrasound-estimated fetal weight, and lower fetoplacental ratio, suggesting the correlation between these markers, impaired glycemic control, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, PTH-rP and PTH-R1 are more expressed in placentas from GDM patients with a phenotype characterized by increased insulin resistance due to metabolic syndrome, increased fasting glycemia, and normal glycemia after fuel load, rather than in placentas from GDM patients with impaired insulin secretion, which usually present normal fasting glycemia and abnormal increased glycemia after fuel load. These findings are coherent with already published data. Zhang et al. demonstrated that PTH-rP induces insulin expression by dephosphorylating c-Jun N-terminal kinases JNK1/2 in pancreatic beta-cells, while Roca-Rodríguez et al. found that PTH-rP mRNA expression in visceral adipose tissue seems to be related to obesity-associated insulin resistance [37,38]. In this perspective, we hypothesize that PTH-rP and PTH-R1 are upregulated in placentas from women with increased insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, and their overexpression should be considered a compensative mechanism aiming to provide an increased calcium-mediated insulin sensitivity in women with GDM and increased insulin resistance. Interestingly, in extravillous trophoblast, PTH-rP and PTH-R1 correlated with different clinical parameters. It is unclear whether this difference may be due to common regulatory mechanisms in the placental expression of these two markers. Since PTH-rP expression decreases PTH-R1 expression, increased placental PTH-R1 may be associated with lower placental PTH-rP expression and, thus, lower fetal weight and fetoplacental ratio.
This is the first study to evaluate PTH-rP and PTH-R1 expression in term of placentas from pregnancies complicated by GDM and to correlate these data with maternal characteristics and pregnancy adverse outcomes. However, limited samples and the lack of a complete evaluation of PTH–vitamin D–calcium axis in these pregnancies (including PTH, PTH-rP, and PTH-r1 expression in maternal serum or umbilical cord blood) make it difficult to clearly understand the role of PTH-rP and PTH-R1 in the placental pathophysiology in pregnancies complicated by GDM.

5. Conclusions

Our data suggest that PTH-rP and PTH-R1 may be useful as markers of placental adaptation to maternal impaired glucose control and insulin resistance. More studies would be needed to confirm our hypothesis and to provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between calcium and glucose metabolism in pregnancies with gestational diabetes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/diagnostics11081356/s1, Table S1: PTH-rP expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S2: PTH-R1 expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S3: PTH-rP expression in syncytiotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S4: PTH-R1 expression in syncytiotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S5: PTH-rP expression in villous cytotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S6: PTH-rP expression in decidua according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S7: PTH-R1 expression in villous cytotrophoblast according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, Table S8: PTH-R1 expression in decidua according to maternal, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.S., V.A.; methodology: M.D., A.S.; software: A.S.; data curation: M.D.; formal analysis: G.F.; resources: S.M., L.T.; writing: A.S., S.M., M.D.; review and editing: V.A., D.P.; supervision: A.L., D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study obtained the approval from local Ethics Committee of Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019 Diabetes Care; American Diabetes Association: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2019; Volume 42, pp. S124–S138. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gortazar, L.; Flores-Le Roux, J.A.; Benaiges, D.; Sarsanedas, E.; Payà, A.; Mañé, L.; Pedro-Botet, J.; Goday, A. Diagestcat Study: Trends in Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Perinatal Outcomes in Catalonia, Spain, 2006–2015. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2019, 13, e3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mitanchez, D.; Yzydorczyk, C.; Siddeek, B.; Boubred, F.; Benahmed, M.; Simeoni, U. The offspring of the diabetic mother–short- and long-term implications. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 29, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cruikshank, D.P.; Pitkin, R.M.; Varner, M.W.; Williams, G.A.; Hargis, G.K. Calcium metabolism in diabetic mother, fetus, and newborn infant. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1983, 145, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Curtis, N.E.; Thomas, R.J.; Gillespie, M.T.; King, R.G.; Rice, G.E.; Wlodek, M.E. Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) mRNA splicing and parathyroid hormone/PTH-rP receptor mRNA expression in human placenta and fetal membranes. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1998, 21, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bertelloni, S.; Baroncelli, G.I.; Pelletti, A.; Battini, R.; Saggese, G. Parathyroid hormone-related protein in healthy pregnant women. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1994, 54, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hysaj, O.; Marqués-Gallego, P.; Richard, A.; Elgizouli, M.; Nieters, A.; Quack Lötscher, K.C.; Rohrmann, S. Parathyroid Hormone in Pregnancy: Vitamin D and Other Determinants. Nutrients 2021, 13, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Legakis, I. The role of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) in the pathophysiology of diabetes mellitus. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2009, 9, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. De Marinis, L.; Merlini, G.; Makhoul, O.; Barbarino, A. Calcium antagonists and hormone release. Role of calcium in glucose-stimulated early phase insulin in vivo. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 1982, 5, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. International Association of Diabetes; Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Strewler, G.J.; Nissenson, R.A. Hypercalcemia in malignancy. West. J. Med. 1990, 153, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Wysolmerski, J.J.; Broadus, A.E. Hypercalcemia of malignancy: The central role of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Annu. Rev. Med. 1994, 45, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Strewler, G.J. The physiology of parathyroid hormone-related protein. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000, 342, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wysolmerski, J.J.; Stewart, A.F. The physiology of parathyroid hormone-related protein: An emerging role as a developmental factor. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1998, 60, 431–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Clemens, T.L.; Cormier, S.; Eichinger, A.; Endlich, K.; Fiaschi-Taesch, N.; Fischer, E.; Friedman, P.A.; Karaplis, A.C.; Massfelder, T.; Rossert, J.; et al. Parathyroid hormone-related protein and its receptors: Nuclear functions and roles in the renal and cardiovascular systems, the placental trophoblasts and the pancreatic islets. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 134, 1113–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lam, M.H.; Thomas, R.J.; Martin, T.J.; Gillespie, M.T.; Jans, D.A. Nuclear and nucleolar localization of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2000, 78, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kovacs, C.S.; Kronenberg, H.M. Maternal-Fetal Calcium and Bone Metabolism during Pregnancy, Puerperium, and Lactation. Endocr. Rev. 1997, 18, 832–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kovacs, C.S.; Manley, N.R.; Moseley, J.M.; Martin, T.J.; Kronenberg, H.M. Fetal parathyroids are not required to maintain placental calcium transport. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1007–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mathieu, C.L.; Burnett, S.H.; Mills, S.E.; Overpeck, J.G.; Bruns, D.E.; Bruns, M.E. Gestational changes in calbindin-D9k in rat uterus, yolk sac, and placenta: Implications for maternal-fetal calcium transport and uterine muscle function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 3433–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. MacManus, J.P.; Brewer, L.M.; Whitfeld, J.F. The widely-distributed tumour protein, oncomodulin, is a normal constituent of human and rodent placentas. Cancer Lett. 1985, 27, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Emoto, Y.; Kobayashi, R.; Akatsuka, H.; Hidaka, H. Purification and characterization of a new member of the S-100 protein family from human placenta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1992, 182, 1246–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Massfelder, T.; Helwig, J.J.; Stewart, A.F. Parathyroid hormone-related protein as a cardiovascular regulatory peptide. Endocrinology 1996, 137, 3151–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Takahashi, K.; Inoue, D.; Ando, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Ikeda, K.; Fujita, T. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide as a locally produced vasorelaxant: Regulation of its mRNA by hypertension in rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 208, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Macgill, K.; Moseley, J.M.; Martin, T.J.; Brennecke, S.P.; Rice, G.E.; Wlodek, M.E. Vascular effects of PTH-rP (1–34) and PTH (1–34) in the human fetal-placental circulation. Placenta 1997, 18, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Crocker, I.; Kaur, M.; Hosking, D.J.; Baker, P.N. Rescue of trophoblast apoptosis by parathyroid hormone-related protein. BJOG 2002, 109, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van De Stolpe, A.; Karperien, M.; Löwik, C.W.; Jüppner, H.; Segre, G.V.; Abou-Samra, A.B.; de Laat, S.W.; Defize, L.H. Parathyroid hormone-related peptide as an endogenous inducer of parietal endoderm differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 120, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Duval, C.; Dilworth, M.R.; Tunster, S.J.; Kimber, S.J.; Glazier, J.D. PTH-rP is essential for normal morphogenetic and functional development of the murine placenta. Dev. Biol. 2017, 430, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Duval, C.; Dilworth, M.R.; Tunster, S.J.; Kimber, S.J.; Glazier, J.D. PTH/PTH-rP receptor and mid-molecule PTH-rP regulation of intrauterine PTH-rP: PTH/PTH-rP receptor antagonism increases SHR fetal weight. Placenta 2004, 25, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Taylor, C.W.; Tovey, S.C. From parathyroid hormone to cytosolic Ca2+ signals. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2012, 40, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Ureña, P. El receptor PTH/PTH-rP: Implicaciones biológicas [The PTH/PTH-rP receptor: Biological implications]. Nefrologia 2003, 23 (Suppl. 2), 12–17. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Cipriani, C.; Colangelo, L.; Santori, R.; Renella, M.; Mastrantonio, M.; Minisola, S.; Pepe, J. The Interplay between Bone and Glucose Metabolism. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ishida, H.; Suzuki, K.; Someya, Y. Possible compensatory role of parathyroid hormone –related peptide on maintenance of calcium homeostasis in patients with noninsulin–dependent diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinol. 1993, 129, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, T.L.; Vasavada, R.C.; Yang, K.; Massfelder, T.; Ganz, M.; Abbas, S.K.; Care, A.D.; Stewart, A.F. Structural and physiologic characterization of the mid-region secretory species of parathyroid hormone-related protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 24371–24381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Sass, M.R.; Albrechtsen, N.J.W.; Pedersen, J.; Hare, K.J.; Borbye-Lorenzen, N.; Kiss, K.; Vilsbøll, T.; Knop, F.K.; Poulsen, S.S.; Jørgensen, N.R.; et al. Secretion of parathyroid hormone may be coupled to insulin secretion in humans. Endocr. Connect. 2020, 9, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Maghbooli, Z.; Hossein-nezhad, A.; Karimi, F.; Shafaei, A.R.; Larijani, B. Correlation between vitamin D3 deficiency and insulin resistance in pregnancy. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2008, 24, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kramer, C.K.; Swaminathan, B.; Hanley, A.J.; Connelly, P.W.; Sermer, M.; Zinman, B.; Retnakaran, R. Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status in pregnancy: Effect on insulin sensitivity, β-cell function, and gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 4506–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, B.; Hosaka, M.; Sawada, Y.; Torii, S.; Mizutani, S.; Ogata, M.; Izumi, T.; Takeuchi, T. Parathyroid hormone-related protein induces insulin expression through activation of MAP kinase-specific phosphatase-1 that dephosphorylates c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase in pancreatic beta-cells. Diabetes 2003, 52, 2720–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Roca-Rodríguez, M.M.; El Bekay, R.; Garrido-Sanchez, L.; Gómez-Serrano, M.; Coin-Aragüez, L.; Oliva-Olivera, W.; Lhamyani, S.; Clemente-Postigo, M.; García-Santos, E.; de Luna Diaz, R.; et al. Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein, Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Adipogenic Capacity and Healthy Obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E826–E835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 11 01356 g001 550
Figure 1. PTH-R1 (A) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) (B) expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast; PTH-R1 (C) and PTH-rP (D) expression in decidua.
Figure 1. PTH-R1 (A) and parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTH-rP) (B) expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast; PTH-R1 (C) and PTH-rP (D) expression in decidua.
Diagnostics 11 01356 g001
Diagnostics 11 01356 g002 550
Figure 2. PTH-R1 (A) and PTH-rP (B) expression in villous cytotrophoblast; PTH-R1 (C) and PTH-rP (D) expression in syncytiotrophoblast.
Figure 2. PTH-R1 (A) and PTH-rP (B) expression in villous cytotrophoblast; PTH-R1 (C) and PTH-rP (D) expression in syncytiotrophoblast.
Diagnostics 11 01356 g002
Diagnostics 11 01356 g003 550
Figure 3. PTH-rP expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast in women with gestational diabetes according to type of abnormal glycemia at oral glucose tolerance test.
Figure 3. PTH-rP expression in extravillous cytotrophoblast in women with gestational diabetes according to type of abnormal glycemia at oral glucose tolerance test.
Diagnostics 11 01356 g003
Diagnostics 11 01356 g004 550
Figure 4. PTH-rP expression in syncytiotrophoblast in women with gestational diabetes according to maternal pregestational body mass index (BMI).
Figure 4. PTH-rP expression in syncytiotrophoblast in women with gestational diabetes according to maternal pregestational body mass index (BMI).
Diagnostics 11 01356 g004
Table
Table 1. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of included women.
Table 1. Maternal, obstetric, and neonatal characteristics of included women.
Pregnancy Characteristicsn = 78p *
Maternal age (years)35 (7)0.233
Pregestational weight (kg)68.51 (14.77)<0.001
Pregestational BMI (kg/m2)25.71 (5.91)<0.001
Maternal BMI ≥ 30 kg/m215 (19.2%)
Previous GDM9 (11.1%)
Nullipara37 (47.4%)
Insulin or metformin therapy38 (48.8%)
Third-trimester ultrasound-estimated fetal weight percentile 64.31 (28.24)0.001
Gestational week at delivery (weeks)38.93 (1.06)0.030
Preterm birth4 (5.1%)
Vaginal delivery52 (66.7%)
Induction of labor22 (28.2%)
Urgent CS or OVD9 (11.5%)
Non-reassuring CTG7 (7.1%)
Neonatal sex (male)38 (48.7%)
Neonatal birthweight (g)3240 (500)0.256
Placental weight (g)529 (151)0.642
Fetoplacental weight ratio6.17 (1.04)0.017
Neonatal birthweight percentile51.59 (30.56)0.002
Neonatal LGA11 (14.1%)
Neonatal RDS4 (5.1%)
Apgar at 1 ≤ 74 (5.1%)
Arterial cord blood pH ≤ 7.154 (5.1%)
Neonatal admission to NICU or neonatal ward5 (6.4%)
Composite neonatal adverse outcome11 (14.1%)
Data are given as n (%), mean (standard deviation), or median (interquartile range). * Shapiro–Wilk test for normality distribution of continuous variables. BMI, body mass index; GDM, gestational diabetes; CS, caesarean section; OVD, operative vaginal delivery; CTG, cardiotocography; LGA, large for gestational age; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.
Table
Table 2. PTH-rP and PTH-R1 immunochemistry positivity according to the placental layer.
Table 2. PTH-rP and PTH-R1 immunochemistry positivity according to the placental layer.
Immunochemistry Expressionn = 78
PTH-rP extravillous cytotrophoblast31 (39%)
PTH-rP syncytiotrophoblast9 (11.5%)
PTH-rP villous cytotrophoblast13 (16.7%)
PTH-rP decidua29 (37.2%)
PTH-rP villous stroma0 (0%)
PTH-R1 extravillous cytotrophoblast52 (66.7%)
PTH-R1 syncytiotrophoblast11 (14.1%)
PTH-R1 villous cytotrophoblast41 (52.6%)
PTH-R1 decidua58 (74.4%)
PTH-R1 villous stroma0 (0%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sirico, A.; Dell’Aquila, M.; Tartaglione, L.; Moresi, S.; Farì, G.; Pitocco, D.; Arena, V.; Lanzone, A. PTH-rP and PTH-R1 Expression in Placentas from Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes: New Insights into the Pathophysiology of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1356. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11081356

AMA Style

Sirico A, Dell’Aquila M, Tartaglione L, Moresi S, Farì G, Pitocco D, Arena V, Lanzone A. PTH-rP and PTH-R1 Expression in Placentas from Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes: New Insights into the Pathophysiology of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(8):1356. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11081356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sirico, Angelo, Marco Dell’Aquila, Linda Tartaglione, Sascia Moresi, Giorgia Farì, Dario Pitocco, Vincenzo Arena, and Antonio Lanzone. 2021. "PTH-rP and PTH-R1 Expression in Placentas from Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes: New Insights into the Pathophysiology of Hyperglycemia in Pregnancy" Diagnostics 11, no. 8: 1356. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11081356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop