Next Article in Journal
Candida Interactions with the Oral Bacterial Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Therapy of Non-Dermatophytic Mycoses in Animals
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 4
Issue 4
10.3390/jof4040121
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Update on the Roles of Non-albicans Candida Species in Vulvovaginitis

by
Olufunmilola Makanjuola
1,*,
Felix Bongomin
2 and
Samuel A. Fayemiwo
1,3
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200284, Nigeria
2
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Gulu University, Gulu P.O. Box 166, Uganda
3
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2018, 4(4), 121; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof4040121
Submission received: 19 September 2018 / Revised: 16 October 2018 / Accepted: 25 October 2018 / Published: 31 October 2018
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida species are one of the commonest causes of vaginitis in healthy women of reproductive age. Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is characterized by vulvovaginal itching, redness and discharge. Candida albicans, which is a common genito-urinary tract commensal, has been the prominent species and remains the most common fungal agent isolated from clinical samples of patients diagnosed with VVC. In recent times, however, there has been a notable shift in the etiology of candidiasis with non-albicans Candida (NAC) species gaining prominence. The NAC species now account for approximately 10% to as high as 45% of VVC cases in some studies. This is associated with treatment challenges and a slightly different clinical picture. NAC species vaginitis is milder in presentation, often occur in patients with underlying chronic medical conditions and symptoms tend to be more recurrent or chronic compared with C. albicans vaginitis. C. glabrata is the most common cause of NAC-VVC. C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. guilliermondii are the other commonly implicated species. Treatment failure is common in NAC-VVC, since some of these species are intrinsically resistant or show low susceptibilities to commonly used antifungal agents. This article reviews the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and management of NAC vulvovaginitis.

1. Introduction

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) also known as vulvovaginal candidosis or Candida vaginitis is a common clinical condition with symptoms and signs of vaginal and vulval inflammation in the presence of Candida species [1].
At least one episode of VVC is experienced in up to 70% to 75% of women in the reproductive age group in their lifetime [2]. Epidemiological information suggests that half of all women would have experienced at least one episode of VVC by the age of 25 years with the onset of sexual activity being an important risk factor in this group of individuals [3].
Those who have had at least four episodes of VVC during a 12-month period are considered to have recurrent VVC (RVVC). Up to 10% of women of reproductive age group have this infection as a recurrent condition, and it therefore translates to about 140 million of women being affected worldwide [4,5,6]. Depending on the location, the Candida species is now ranked as either primary cause or the second most common cause of vaginal infections accounting for 20–30% of these infections [7,8,9]. Traditionally, C. albicans has been regarded as the principal etiologic agent of VVC; however, non-albicans Candida (NAC) species have recently gained scientific and epidemiological interests as their prevalence is on the increase globally. NAC species are identified more often in complicated VVC than uncomplicated cases [10]. Most cases of NAC vaginitis are due to C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. dubliniensis, with C. glabrata predominating [7,11]. Clinical picture of NAC vaginitis is quite varied, it tends to be milder in severity than C. albicans infection but may also be indistinguishable. Diabetes mellitus, older age, prior antifungal agents use, and low socioeconomic status are conditions that result in higher likelihood of non-albicans candidiasis. Pathogenic mechanisms of non-albicans Candida are not as well understood as those of Candida albicans where more extensive research has been carried out. Adhesion, epithelial invasion, and secretion of enzymes play important roles in pathogenicity. C. glabrata uses immune evasion strategy as a pathogenic mechanism. An important characteristic of NAC species is intrinsic resistance or low dose susceptibility to the azole antifungals, the first-line treatment, resulting in treatment failure [12]. Identification and antifungal susceptibility testing are necessary for optimal treatment of these infections, especially in settings where diagnosis is based on clinical presentation or limited laboratory testing.

2. Classification of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

An internationally acceptable classification of VVC was adopted over a decade ago [1]. VVC is classified as either uncomplicated or complicated disease based on clinical presentation, host factors, microbiology, and response to therapy [1,13].
Most women with VVC suffer from uncomplicated vaginitis. This presents as sporadic cases of mild to moderate infections usually due to C. albicans, and these cases occur predominantly in healthy adult women who have no predisposing factors. On the other hand, about 10–20% of women suffer from complicated VVC that is characterized by more severe attacks or are caused by NAC species with diagnostic and therapeutic implications [10,14]. Infections in pregnancy or associated with or other concurrent conditions, such as immunosuppression and uncontrolled diabetes, are also categorized as complicated infections [1].

3. Transmission

Candida species colonize the genital tract of women and studies have indicated that the organism may be isolated from the genital tract in 10–55% of healthy, asymptomatic women of child-bearing age where it may result in symptomatic infection when the balance between Candida and the vaginal defense factors is altered [7,15,16]. Candida species also colonize extragenital sites such as such as the oral cavity and the rectum where it exists as indigenous microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract. Candida may also be found as colonizers of the perianal skin and lower urinary tract. Vertical transmission of Candida from mother to infant during childbirth birth allows early establishment of colonization of these various sites where its interaction with other resident microbiota and host immunity prevent transition from commensal organisms to pathogens [17]. These sites of colonization have also been implicated as reservoir of genital recolonization in patients with RVVC [18].
Although Candida species are not regarded as classical sexually transmitted pathogens, there is some evidence that this organism can be transmitted by both oral and insertive vaginal intercourse [15,19,20,21].

4. Etiology of Non-albicans Candida Vaginitis

Most cases of VVC are still caused by C. albicans, however, the NAC species are increasingly being implicated in the etiology of VVC [11,12,22,23,24].
Several NAC species have been identified in VVC with the most common including C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. dubliniensis, C. africana, C. duobushaemulonii, and C. auris [7,11,25,26,27]. C. glabrata is the most prevalent cause of NAC-vaginitis [28]. As a result of an earlier observation that it lacked pseudohyphae formation, C. glabrata was initially classified in the genus Torulopsis, which was described in 1894. The genus Candida was named much later in 1913 and recent studies have shown that the organism capable of pseudohyphae and even germ tube formation [10,29]. C. krusei has been reported as an uncommon cause of vaginitis [8,30,31]. It a cause of refractory vaginitis due to intrinsic azole resistance, hence poor response to conventional antimycotic agents and is commoner in older white women [32]. C. parapsilosis is also isolated in Candida vaginitis on vaginal fungal culture although this is a relatively infrequent occurrence [13]. However, it was identified as the most frequent Candida species in one study conducted at a tertiary care center in North India [23]. C. parapsilosis, which was earlier separated into three groups has now been divided into three distinct, closely related species, C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis [33]. C. dubliniensis is similar to C. albicans phenotypically, resulting in the underreporting of this organism on routine diagnosis in the laboratory [34]. It is noted to be quite common in HIV-positive individuals [35]. C. tropicalis is a NAC species with the highest similarity to C. albicans genetically [36]. C. africana, produces germ tubes like C. albicans but it does not produce chlamydospores. It was first isolated from patients in Africa and Germany, has been reported to cause of VVC in patients in these countries and also in Spain and Italy [37,38]. C. duobushaemulonii and other members of the Candida haemulonii species complex rarely cause infections in humans. Infection is however more likely in patients with diabetes mellitus [39]. C. auris is increasingly being reported from a variety of clinical samples as a cause of candidiasis with varying degrees of severity [40]. It is better known as a causative agent of candidaemia but has also been reported as a cause of VVC [41,42]. Less common species identified as causes of NAC vaginitis include C. guilliermondii, C. famata, C. lusitaniae, C. norvegiensis, C. nivariensis and C. bracarensis, and C. inconspicua [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].

5. Clinical Presentation

Clinical presentation varies from sporadic occasional episodes of mild infection to severe and frequent symptoms [13]. Vaginal Candida infection usually presents as vaginitis with intense vulval itching/irritation often accompanied by curdy-white scanty to copious discharge [44,45].
NAC infections generally present with milder symptoms when compared with C. albicans vaginitis [13,46]. This is in keeping with findings that NAC species are more frequently isolated from asymptomatic women than those with symptomatic infections [22]. Superficial dyspareunia, pain at the vaginal opening during intercourse, is also commoner in C. albicans vaginitis than that caused by NAC species [5]. Patients with underlying medical conditions are more likely to have NAC species infections [5]. Chronic infections are also more likely to have NAC species than acute infections as a significant proportion of these infections result from NAC species, even though C. albicans still predominates [47].
In spite of these general features, several reports have found contrasting pictures. Grigoriou et al. [48] reported that more frequent vaginal soreness and painful intercourse were caused by NAC than by C. albicans. In that study, C. glabrata and C. krusei were the predominant NAC species identified. Some researchers have also noted the clinical syndromes were either indistinguishable between those caused by NAC species and those by C. albicans or had very subtle differences [5,47]. Clinical features therefore appear unreliable in differentiating C. albicans from NAC infections and it is therefore recommended that the diagnosis of infection should not be on the basis of clinical features alone.
Recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC) is defined as the occurrence at least four episodes of VVC in a one-year-period [1]. Recurrent infection as seen in RVVC, unlike persistent infection, is characterized by the presence of intervals when the patient is free of symptoms [49]. Recurrent infections have a mutual relationship with NAC species infection where the occurrence of one predisposes to the other. Recurrent infections commonly lead to increased frequency of NAC species colonization, and also, the persistence of NAC species due to their resistance to antifungal agents might result in recurrent infections. This relationship is more common with C. glabrata [15,49]. The prevalence of NAC species usually increases with each subsequent episode of VVC in those with recurrent infections. A study that quantified this rate found at least 10% increase in a population of HIV negative women, which was unusually higher than the finding in HIV positive women [15].

6. Epidemiology of Non-albicans Vulvovaginal Candidiasis

Epidemiological data in the last two decades have revealed a striking mycological shift in regards to geographic variation in etiologic species of VVC. There is a rising prevalence of infections caused by NAC species, while that of C. albicans is decreasing in spite of retaining its position as the most common Candida species in general [44,50]. This trend is not limited to vaginal infections but has been reported in infections in many other sites of the body [11,51,52,53]. As a result of this, other species, predominantly C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis, are gaining clinical recognition [52].
This change has been fueled by the widespread and indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics coupled with the increased availability of both over-the-counter and prescribed antimycotic agents [54]. An earlier study that was published in 1991 by Horowitz and colleagues reported an increase in the occurrence of VVC due to NAC species from about 10% in the 1970s to up to 20% in the 1980s [55]. A more recent multicenter study in support of this observation noted that during the time periods of 1997–2000 and 2005–2007 the rates of isolation of C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis increased from 10.2% to 11.7%, 5.4% to 8.0%, and 4.8% to 5.6%, respectively [56]. The epidemiological trend is that VVC that is caused by NAC species is associated with higher frequency of recurrence [16,27].
A single general estimate of the global prevalence of NAC species in VVC is difficult to establish. There is limited data on the actual epidemiology and distribution of the various non-albicans Candida species in vulvovaginitis. Table 1 is a summary of some studies on the prevalence of the various NAC species in various patient populations. In women with VVC, the distribution of NAC species identified varies widely depending on the populations studied and also the locations and may account for the findings. However, from most published studies, a range of as low as approximately ~10% to, in some studies, as high as 45% have been reported (Table 1). [44]. In contrast to the predominance of C. albicans, Deorukhkar and colleagues reported that NAC species accounted for over 60% of their isolates, while Sangare et al found non-albicans species predominating in their study population of pregnant women [11,57]. NAC species are more likely to be isolated from samples of patients with multiple positive cultures than from samples with only one organism cultured, a picture that is commoner in the older age group [12].
In general, C. glabrata is the most common NAC species, causing vaginitis, accounting for half to two-thirds of cases in majority of reports of NAC vaginitis, [7,12,13,28]. Rarely, other NAC species have been reported as the most prevalent, such as that by Jackson et al. [54] where C. tropicalis was their predominant species, followed by C. glabrata. Also, a study among pregnant women identified C. tropicalis as the most prevalent Candida species, higher than C. albicans [8]. Another study from Belgium reported C. guilliermondii isolates in 17.3% among patients with symptomatic VVC [27].
There is no clear second most common NAC species as different studies have documented C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis in varying proportions [7,8,30,31,44]. C. krusei is generally of low prevalence [8]. Table 1 is a summary of the epidemiology of non-albicans vaginal candidiasis across some locations globally between 2001 and 2018 (up to May).

7. Pathogenesis

Candida species exists as a normal commensal in many parts of the body, including the female genital tract with its growth being continually controlled and limited by the innate immune system and complex bacterial microbiome dynamics [16].
Many factors have been attributed to the pathogenic potentials of Candida species, some of which includes adhesion molecules that aid in the invasion of the organism into the host epithelial cells, secretion of various enzymes e.g., hydrolases, yeast-to-hypha transition, phenotypic switching, biofilm formation, contact tracing, and thigmotropism. The most critical virulent factors in the pathogenesis of VVC include the cell wall, adhesion, and extracellular proteolytic enzymes.
The cell wall of Candida species is one of the components useful for the success of the organism as a pathogen. It is composed of polysaccharides, mannan, glucan, and chitin. Mannan (23%) and glucan (40–60%) form the substantial proportion of the cell wall composition. Attachment of the Candida cell wall to the vaginal epithelium is the initial step that distinguishes colonisation from infection Immune recognition of Candida species is dominated significantly by the biding of the fungal cell wall carbohydrates, which is mediated by fungal pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) engagement with the host pattern recognition receptors (PRRs).
Adherence of the Candida species to the vaginal epithelial surface also results in the successful colonisation or infection. C. albicans adheres significantly in higher numbers than the non-Candida albicans species, like C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. guilliermondii. The mechanism of this adherence contributes to the persistence of Candida species within the host and this is crucial to the establishment of the colonisation, as well as infection. The specific cell proteins called adhesins mediate these attachments to the epithelial surface. Adhesins usually recognise the host ligand, extracellular matrix, and promote the binding to abiotic surfaces [56].
Most of the enzymes that are expressed by Candida species are involved in the degradation of the connective tissues and cleavage of the host immune defense proteins, which in turn, enhance the nutrition acquisition, fungal invasion, and evasion of the host immune system. Of all the hydrolases, aspartyl proteases have demonstrated to have significant roles, which range from inactivation of Factor-H to: complement receptors CR3 and CR4 on macrophages. These activities mediate the escape of Candida species from the innate immune system’s recognition.
Most data on Candida-epithelial surface interactions have been on research using Candida albicans and information is deficient on such interactions in NAC species. Following colonization, various pathogenic mechanisms are involved in interactions of candida with the vaginal epithelium, including infiltration and invasion, induced endocytosis, secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and hydrolytic enzymes, epithelial damage, and reduction in mucosal barrier function. These Candida-epithelial interactions vary between different species and even different strains of same species [68].
C. albicans ability to switch between yeast and hyphal morphologies is central to its virulence. This yeast- hyphal switch is controlled by environmental sensors and regulatory transcriptional factors. The resultant morphogenic responses contribute to the immunopathology of the vaginitis in VVC through the Efg1 and the Bcr1 pathways expression [69]. Recently, Candidalysin, a peptide toxin secreted during hyphal formation was discovered in C. albicans as a virulence factor in this organism. Candidalysin is a crucial in immunopathology of vulvovaginal candidiasis, as it promotes epithelial damage, stimulates immune activation, and phagocyte function [70].
C. glabrata is able to survive in macrophages as an immune evasion strategy, thus avoiding the innate immune response to pathogens. This adaptation to intracellular survival is related to its ability to prevent toxic phagolysosome environments by modifying its phagosome, suppressing ROS production and producing minimal proinflammatory response [71].
C. dubliniensis genome is very similar to that of C. albicans but in terms of pathogenicity, both species differ considerably. One of the reasons that could account for the higher pathogenicity in C. albicans is the absence of ALS3, gene, a protein that is involved in epithelial adhesion, in C. dubliniensis [68].
More extensive research on virulence has been has been carried out on C. albicans as compared to the NAC species and C. albicans is able to express all virulence factors. The NAC species exhibit various combinations of virulence factors depending on the strain [72].
Hyphae production though a major factor in C. albicans infection plays little if any role in majority of NAC vaginitis [73]. Phospholipase activity has been noted to enhance adherence to host cells and also the production of biofilms. It has been postulated that, during infections, adhesion to host cell membranes and lysis are mediated by phospholipases [74]. Phospholipase production is better in C. albicans in comparison to other species of Candida; a study showed that 53% of the tested NAC species had detectable phospholipase activity [74,75].
A study conducted to demonstrate the virulence factors in various Candida species documented that among the NAC species, all were able to demonstrate some of the tested virulence factors in varying proportions. Biofilm production was noted as highest in C. tropicalis but was not seen in C. dublinensis, and C. glabrata demonstrated the highest hemolysin production. The NAC species generally produced low levels of coagulase production and coagulase was undetectable in C. kefyr and C. dublinensis [11]. High-frequency reversible phenotypic switching, which is important in C. albicans, has also been demonstrated in C. tropicalis [76]. Hemolysin production by NAC has been found to be comparable to that of C. albicans [75].

8. Risk Factors

Risk factors that are commonly associated with VVC include the recent prolonged use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, extreme of ages, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, oral contraceptive use and pregnancy [48].
Antibiotics use is associated with both an increased prevalence of vaginal colonization by Candida and increased incidence of symptomatic infection during the period of antibiotic therapy [77]. Use of azole antimycotics, especially low dose maintenance regimens predispose to NAC vulvovaginitis [8,11]. Many topical azole antifungals are available as over-the-counter medications, which has greatly increased their use, thereby increasing the prevalence of NAC vaginitis [12].
Diabetes mellitus (DM) also results in both increased rate of vaginal Candida colonization and infection with Candida [11]. Poorly controlled DM causes increased glycogen levels and other metabolic alterations, which lower vaginal PH resulting in Candida colonization at a rate higher than that of commensal bacteria (vaginal dysbiosis) and infection [78]. A significant proportion of VVC in diabetic patients is caused by NAC species, especially C. glabrata and C. tropicalis [79]. Both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes patients are prone to NAC VVC, but there are conflicting reports as to which group has a higher predisposition to NAC species infection than the other [30,78]. Usage of estrogen also predisposes to candidiasis by stimulating epithelial production of glycogen, thus supplying a rich substrate for Candida. Dennerstein and Ellis noted a differential metabolism of glycogen between C. albicans and NAC species as all NAC species tested did not metabolize glycogen while C. albicans did. This observation may have a bearing on the pathogenicity and proportion of NAC in patients on estrogen therapy.
A relationship exists between VVC and age. Young women aged 21–40 years are significantly more likely than older age groups to suffer from VVC [9,80]. However, older age group has been associated with NAC infections when compared to C. albicans [26,46,81]. The practice of vaginal douching has been found to be associated with the development of VVC [11,82] with higher frequency of douching resulting in the higher likelihood of having NAC infection [46,83].
Pregnant women are predisposed to VVC, with a high rate of Candida species isolation in both symptomatic and asymptomatic women [84]. A prevalence of VVC of up to 36–37% has been found among pregnant women [85,86]. Infections are more likely in the third trimester than other periods [85]. Although, in general, C. albicans is also the most common species among pregnant women, some studies have found NAC species, such as C. tropicalis, predominating [8,31,87,88]. Low socioeconomic background, poor education, non-white race, and underling medical conditions are commoner in NAC vaginitis [5,46]. Candidiasis, including VVC, is a common opportunistic infection in HIV positive patients [89]. It has been discovered that, over time, a significant increase in the prevalence of vaginal colonization with NAC species occurs among HIV positive women. This finding is thought to be due to long term administration of fluconazole for prophylaxis against other fungal opportunistic infections in HIV positive individuals [89,90]. A study with comparable findings observed that C. dubliniensis infection is less likely in HIV-negative patients than HIV positive [11]. Similarly, low viral load is associated with a low likelihood of vaginal carriage of NAC [89].

9. Laboratory Identification

It is necessary to identify the Candida species responsible for infections in all patients presenting with VVC especially those with refractory infections. Such identification will influence antimycotic agents selection and duration of therapy [32].
Vaginal and endocervical swab samples are collected and a microscopic examination of these secretions is performed as a wet smear. In some cases, 10–15% potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution is used to disintegrate other cellular elements and thus makes it easier to detect Candida yeast cells. A characteristic fishy odor on addition of KOH to the smear, positive “whiff test”, is suggestive of bacterial vaginosis aiding in differentiating the infection from candidiasis. Prepared slides may be examined by light microscopy; however, phase contrast or polarized light microscopy may be employed as these make details easier to observe. Wet mount, which shows only blastospores on microscopy, is usually an early suggestion of NAC species infection; whereas, the presence of hyphae shows that the infection is most likely due to C. albicans [32,91]. Smears may also be made, air-dried, and fixed with methanol or heat to be examined by Gram-, Giemsa-, or Papanicolaou staining.
Candida species are able to grow well at 25–37 °C on non-selective media, such as blood agar and also Sabouraud’s dextrose agar with or without antibiotics, a medium that is usually used for the selective culture and identification of fungi. Colonies are fast growing with typical yeast colonies appearing within 1–2 days of incubation [92,93].
Candida chromogenic media are culture media containing chromogenic substances, with species specific hydrolysis of these substances, resulting in color change. Such media include CHROMAgar Candida and ChromID Candida agar [94,95]. Chromogenic media are useful for direct speciation of the most common species of Candida on culture and also for the detection of mixed cultures [92,95,96]. Fluconazole may also be added to CHROMAgar for detection of fluconazole resistance in clinical isolates [95,97].
Identification of Candida species following its characteristic appearance on media is based on microscopy of the wet mount and Gram stain, which shows budding yeast cells with or without pseudohyphae and hyphae [32,91,93]. Following the morphological identification of Candida spp., a germ tube test is carried out and germ tube-positive species are presumptively identified as C. albicans [93,98]. However, two NAC species, C. dubliniensis and C. africana, are also germ tube positive [99,100]. This has often led to the underreporting of these NAC species. C. dubliniensis and C. africana can be differentiated from C. albicans most definitively using molecular testing. Phenotypic tests, such as gas-liquid chromatography, appearance on chromogenic agar, growth on Pal’s, and growth at elevated temperatures can also be used reliably [101,102].
Chlamydospores formation on cornmeal agar also aids in distinguishing NAC from C. albicans infection, as C. albicans produces chlamydospores on nutrient deficient media [103].
Germ tube-negative colonies are regarded as NAC species and they are further speciated using various identification systems and methods. Several of these commercial identification systems are available such as Rapid ID yeast plus System, API 20 C system, Vitek2 yeast identification system, API ID 32C, Yeast Star, Yeast Plus system, Auxacolor, and API Candida [104,105]. The common Candida species are identified equally by the most used tests (Auxacolor, API ID32C and Vitek) while Vitek is said perform best at correctly identifying rare species [105,106].
Molecular biology techniques, such as PCR, are now being used to identify Candida species and other sexually transmitted pathogens [107]. Results are variable depending on test sensitivity and specificity [96]. Newer methods, such as real time PCR, restriction fragment length polymorphisms, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA have faster turnaround times, allow for the identification of a variable number of species and different strains of a specie [10,81,108,109]. It is important not to rely on microscopy, culture, or PCR alone to avoid inaccurate results [96].

10. Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Candida Species

Increasing resistance to antifungal agents especially fluconazole has made antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida important. Remarkable progress has been made in antifungal susceptibility testing. Broth dilution, Disk diffusion, microtiter method, and E test are now available with species-specific breakpoints for each agent. Assays for susceptibility to antifungal agents are most carried out for azoles such as fluconazole, itraconazole and/or voriconazole [110].
The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) have standardized methods for antifungal susceptibility testing and developed breakpoints for classifying some Candida and NAC species. In C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, the CLSI breakpoints for Fluconazole Susceptible (S), Susceptible Dose Dependent (SDD), and Resistant (R) are ≤2, 4, ≤8 µg/mL, respectively. In C. glabrata, MIC values of ≤32 and ≤64 µg/ml are regarded as SDD and resistant, respectively, while C. krusei is assumed to be intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, thus MIC interpretations are not recommended [111]. In spite of these standardized methods of testing, interpretation of susceptibility results remain a challenge. NAC species exhibit varying antifungal susceptibility profiles. A significant change in the epidemiologic pattern of Candida and also development of resistance among previously susceptible Candida species have resulted from an increased availability of both prescribed and over-the-counter antifungal agents [54]. Most NAC species now have higher azole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) thus the resultant infections are usually difficult to treat [12]. Resistance is common in NAC species to the azole group of antifungal agents [11]. A large study found more than two-thirds of their C. glabrata vaginal isolates to be fluconazole non-susceptible which was higher than the report for bloodstream infection isolates [12,112]. Even among non-albicans vaginal Candida isolates with low prevalence of fluconazole resistance, increased dose-dependent resistance has been demonstrated with implications on optimal therapy of vaginitis that is caused by these NAC species [113]. The MICs of some NAC have been noted to increase by several folds following exposure to antifungal agents but this increase may also occur in the absence of such exposure [12]. Organisms from patients with recurrent VVC are more resistant to azoles than those from uncomplicated VVC patients [110].
In C. glabrata infections, antifungal susceptibility may be affected by low pH, the usual vaginal environment. In such condition, a progressive increase in MIC for Amphotericin B and azoles are evident when the pH is lowered, though isolates remain susceptible to flucytosine and caspofungin [28]. C. parapsilosis isolates have antifungal susceptibility similar to that of C. albicans [114]. C. auris, an emerging Candida specie is reported to be intrinsically resistant to the azoles and amphotericin B [41,42].

11. Treatment of Non-albicans Candida Vulvovaginal Vaginitis

First-line treatment for candida vaginitis is with topical antifungal agents, such as clotrimazole, or a single 150-mg oral dose of fluconazole with good response in uncomplicated cases [115]. Unlike C. albicans infection where fluconazole is effective in most cases, NAC species infections are not as responsive to fluconazole [12,47,79]. Effective treatment and elimination of NAC, particularly C. glabrata from the vagina is difficult, as this first-line treatment is associated with a high failure rate [116,117]. This makes symptomatic NAC vaginitis a significant health problem for the clinician [28]. Alternative treatment options are limited as the current armamentarium of antifungal agents is quite narrow in range.
Nystatin has been found to be an excellent choice for the treatment of NAC vaginitis. One study found that the resistance rate to Nystatin in their isolates was 0.3% among C. glabrata, while for C. krusei and C. tropicalis, it was 3.8% and 0, respectively [50]. Boric acid suppositories are also able to achieve high mycological cure in NAC vaginitis [79]. It is given as 600 mg capsules that are inserted once or twice daily intravaginally for two weeks [12,117,118]. Other treatments that have been found to be effective are 17% flucytosine topically for two weeks, high dose fluconazole (800 mg) daily for 2–3 weeks, Amphotericin B suppositories and oral posaconazole [118,119,120]. Local imidazole, nystatin, ciclopirox olamine, or boric acid should be used for C. krusei infection, as it is resistant to the triazoles, such as fluconazole and itraconazole [32,118]. C. parapsilosis vaginitis is easily treatable due to its high susceptibility to virtually all antifungal agents [121,122].
Combination therapies of boric acid and amphotericin B have also been tried with excellent results. However, the high cost of this regimen is a major limitation to wide use [117]. Echinocandins, such as micafungin and anidulafungin, are very expensive, though useful for invasive infections are not indicated in vaginal infections due to lack of topical preparations in clinical use [118]. Maintenance therapy or prophylaxis is essential, following treatment of an acute episode of RVVC in both C. albicans and NAC infections [49]. Although a cure is difficult to achieve, patients with chronic recurrent VVC may be given weekly or monthly treatment with fluconazole on a long-term basis to reduce the rate of recurrence of symptomatic infection [123]. A regimen of 150mg fluconazole every other day for three doses, which is followed by 150–200 mg fluconazole weekly for six months, is able to prevent further recurrence in over 80% of women [124].

Supportive Care: Effect of Probiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms which when they are administered on a host in adequate amounts confer a health benefit [125]. Studies have demonstrated that lactobacilli can inhibit the Candida growth and/or adherence to the vaginal epithelium. Probiotics, particularly Lactobcillus acidophilus, L. rhamnosus GR-1, and L. fermentum RC-14, have therefore been considered as potential preventive agents in women who suffering from RVVC [126]. They are administered either orally or intravaginally. Clinical efficacy is however inconclusive as some other studies have not been able to demonstrate the benefit of these probiotics in the prevention of RVVC [127]. Of note is that these trials have been carried out on C. albicans, not the NAC species, thus there is lack of information on the effects of probiotics on NAC.

12. Conclusions

Vaginal candidiasis is a common infection in women worldwide. C. albicans is the most common etiology but there is an ongoing increase in the prevalence of NAC species in vaginal and indeed other candida infections due to increasing use of antifungal agents and susceptible patient population. This trend is unlikely to wane given the circumstances. Large gaps, which need to be filled, exist in our current understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of non-albicans Candida infections Most respond poorly to fluconazole, C. krusei is intrinsically resistant to fluconazole, the usual therapy for VVC, resulting in treatment failure and the need for alternative therapy. Definitive laboratory procedures are of paramount importance to identify Candida isolates from suspected VVC cases to a species level to ensure appropriate and effective use of antifungal agents.

Author Contributions

S.A.F. conceived the manuscript and assisted with manuscript preparation and editing. O.M. performed the bibliography review, data collection and drafting and editing of the manuscript, F.B. assisted with bibliography review and manuscript editing. This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Statement

This work did not involve human participants or animals. It therefore did not require informed consent or any other form of consent. No ethical or institutional approval/permission was required for this review.

Abbreviations

VVCVulvovaginal candidiasis
RVVCRecurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis
NACNon-albicans Candida
KOHPotassium hydroxide
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
DMDiabetes mellitus

References

  1. Achkar, J.M.; Fries, B.C. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 253–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mardh, P.-A.; Rodrigues, A.G.; Genc, M.; Novikova, N.; Martinez-de-Oliveria, J.; Guaschino, S. Facts and myths on recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis—A review on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy. Int. J. STD AIDS 2002, 13, 522–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geiger, A.; Foxman, B. Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis: A case-control study among university students. Epidemiology 1996, 7, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Powell, A.M.; Nyirjesy, P. Recurrent vulvovaginitis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 28, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Geiger, A.M.; Foxman, B.; Sobel, J.D. Chronic vulvovaginal candidiasis: Characteristics of women with Candida albicans, C glabrata and no candida. Genitourin. Med. 1995, 71, 304–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. The Fungal Infection Trust: How Common are Fungal Diseases? Available online: https://www.fungalinfectiontrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/How-Common-are-Fungal-Diseases-v12.2.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2018).
  7. Babic, M.; Hukic, M. Candida albicans and non-albicans species as etiological agent of vaginitis in pregnant and non-pregnant women. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2010, 10, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kalia, N.; Singh, J.; Sharma, S.; Kamboj, S.S.; Arora, H.; Kaur, M. Prevalence of Vulvovaginal Infections and Species Specific Distribution of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Married Women of North India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2015, 4, 253–266. [Google Scholar]
  9. Makanjuola, O.; Adedokun, B.; Fayemiwo, S.; Bakare, R. Correlates of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Attendees of a Special Treatment Clinic in Nigeria. Int. STD Res. Rev. 2016, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fidel, P.L.; Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D. Candida glabrata: Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Deorukhkar, S.C.; Saini, S.; Mathew, S. Non-albicans Candida Infection: An Emerging Threat. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2014, 2014, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Richter, S.S.; Galask, R.P.; Messer, S.A.; Hollis, R.J.; Diekema, D.J.; Pfaller, M.A. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2155–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nyirjesy, P. Vulvovaginal Candidiasis and Bacterial Vaginosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2008, 22, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Workowski, K.A.; Berman, S.M. Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2006, 55, 1–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sobel, J.D. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: A comparison of HIV-positive and -negative women. Int. J. STD & AIDS 2002, 13, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrer, J. Vaginal candidosis: Epidemiological and etiological factors. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2000, 71 (Suppl. 1), 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neville, B.A.; d’Enfert, C.; Bougnoux, M.-E. Candida albicans commensalism in the gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mårdh, P.-A.; Novikova, N.; Stukalova, E. Colonisation of extragenital sites by Candida in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis. BJOG 2003, 110, 934–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Reed, B.D.; Zazove, P.; Pierson, C.L.; Gorenflo, D.W.; Horrocks, J. Candida Transmission and Sexual Behaviors as Risks for a Repeat Episode of Candida Vulvovaginitis. J. Women’s Health 2003, 12, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rylander, E.; Berglund, A.-L.; Krassny, C.; Petrini, B.; Rylander, E. Vulvovaginal candida in a young sexually active population: Prevalence and association with oro-genital sex and frequent pain at intercourse. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2004, 80, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Muzny, C.A.; Rivers, C.A.; Parker, C.J.; Mena, L.A.; Austin, E.L.; Schwebke, J.R. Lack of evidence for sexual transmission of genital Candida species among women who have sex with women: A mixed methods study. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2014, 90, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dan, M.; Poch, F.; Levin, D. High rate of vaginal infections caused by non-C. albicans Candida species among asymptomatic women. Med. Mycol. 2002, 40, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kumari, V.; Banerjee, T.; Kumar, P.; Pandey, S.; Tilak, R. Emergence of non-albicans Candida among candidal vulvovaginitis cases and study of their potential virulence factors, from a tertiary care center, North India. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2013, 56, 144–147. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Mintz, J.D.; Martens, M.G. Prevalence of non-albicans Candida infections in women with recurrent vulvovaginal symptomatology. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 3, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kothavade, R.J.; Kura, M.M.; Valand, A.G.; Panthaki, M.H. Candida tropicalis: Its prevalence, pathogenicity and increasing resistance to fluconazole. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Guzel, A.B.; Aydin, M.; Meral, M.; Kalkanci, A.; Ilkit, M. Clinical characteristics of Turkish women with Candida. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. De Vos, M.M.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Boekhout, T.; Theelen, B.; Matthijs, N.; Bauters, T.; Nailis, H.; Dhont, M.A.; Rodriguez-Tudela, J.L.; Nelis, H.J. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in a Flemish patient population. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Danby, C.S.; Boikov, D.; Rautemaa-richardson, R.; Sobel, J.D. Effect of pH on In Vitro Susceptibility of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans to 11 Antifungal Agents and Implications for Clinical Use. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1403–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lachke, S.A.; Joly, S.; Daniels, K.; Soll, D.R. Phenotypic switching and filamentation in Candida glabrata. Microbiology 2002, 148, 2661–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. De Leon, E.M.; Jacober, S.J.; Sobel, J.D.; Foxman, B. Prevalence and risk factors for vaginal Candida colonization in Women With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. BMC Infect Dis. 2002, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nelson, M.; Wanjiru, W.; Margaret, M.W. Prevalence of Vaginal Candidiasis and Determination of the Occurrence of Candida Species in Pregnant Women Attending the Antenatal Clinic of Thika District Hospital, Kenya. Open J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Singh, S.; Sobel, J.D.; Bhargava, P.; Boikov, D.; Vazquez, J.A. Vaginitis due to Candida krusei: Epidemiology, clinical aspects, and therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 35, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tavanti, A.; Davidson, A.D.; Gow, N.A.R.; Maiden, M.C.J.; Odds, F.C. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 284–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chryssanthoou, E.; Fernandez, V.; Petrini, B. Performance of commercial latex agglutination tests for the differentiation of Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans in routine diagnostics. APMIS 2007, 115, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kullberg, B.J.; Arendrup, M.C. Invasive Candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 1445–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Butler, G.; Rasmussen, M.D.; Lin, M.F.; Santos, M.A.S.; Sakthikumar, S.; Munro, C.A.; Rheinbay, E.; Grabherr, M.; Forche, A.; Reedy, J.L.; et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 2009, 459, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shan, Y.; Fan, S.; Liu, X.; Li, J. Prevalence of Candida albicans-closely related yeasts, Candida africana and Candida dubliniensis in vulvovaginal candidiasis. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tietz, H.J.; Hopp, M.; Schmalreck, A.; Sterry, W.; Czaika, V. Candida africana sp. nov., a new human pathogen or a variant of Candida albicans? Mycoses 2001, 44, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Boatto, H.F.; Cavalcanti, S.D.B.; Del Negro, G.M.B.; Girão, M.J.B.C.; Francisco, E.C.; Ishida, K.; Gompertz, O.F. Candida duobushaemulonii: An emerging rare pathogenic yeast isolated from recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2016, 111, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sears, D.; Schwartz, B.S. Candida auris: An emerging multidrug-resistant pathogen. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 63, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lee, W.G.; Shin, J.H.; Uh, Y.; Kang, M.G.; Kim, S.H.; Park, K.H.; Jang, H.-C. First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 3139–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kumar, D.; Banerjee, T.; Pratap, C.B.; Tilak, R.; Tilak, R. Itraconazole-resistant Candida auris with phospholipase, proteinase and hemolysin activity from a case of vulvovaginitis. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2015, 9, 435–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liu, X.P.; Fan, S.R.; Peng, Y.T.; Zhang, H.P. Species distribution and susceptibility of Candida isolates from patient with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Southern China from 2003 to 2012. J. Mycol. Med. 2014, 24, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Narayankhedkar, A.; Hodiwala, A.; Mane, A. Clinicoetiological Characterization of Infectious Vaginitis amongst Women of Reproductive Age Group from Navi Mumbai, India. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2015, 2015, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. McCormack, W. Vulvovaginitis and Cervicitis. In Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th ed.; Mandell, G.L., Bennet, J.E., Dolin, R., Eds.; Elsevier Churchill Livingstone: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010; Volume 1, pp. 1495–1510. ISBN 978-0-4430-6839-3. [Google Scholar]
  46. Spinillo, A.; Capuzzo, E.; Egbe, T.O.; Baltaro, F.; Nicola, S.; Piazzi, G. Torulopsis glabrata Vaginitis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995, 85, 993–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nyirjesy, P.; Seeney, S.M.; Terry Grody, M.H.; Jordan, C.A.; Buckley, H.R. Chronic fungal vaginitis: The value of cultures. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1995, 173, 820–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grigoriou, O.; Baka, S.; Makrakis, E.; Hassiakos, D.; Kapparos, G.; Kouskouni, E. Prevalence of clinical vaginal candidiasis in a university hospital and possible risk factors. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006, 126, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ringdahl, E.N.; Columbia, M. Treatment of Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis. Am. Fam. Physician 2000, 61, 3306–3312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, F.J.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Z.H.; Wu, W.X.; Bai, H.H.; Dong, H.Y. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of vulvovaginal Candida isolates in China. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2016, 129, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Kauffman, C.A.; Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D.; Gallis, H.A.; McKinsey, D.S.; Karchmer, A.W.; Sugar, A.M.; Sharkey, P.K.; Wise, G.J.; Mangi, R.; et al. Prospective Multicenter Surveillance Study of Funguria in Hospitalized Patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 30, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Silva, S.; Negri, M.; Henriques, M.; Oliveira, R.; Williams, D.W.; Azeredo, J. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: Biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 36, 288–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ruan, S.-Y.; Hsueh, P.-R. Invasive Candidiasis: An Overview from Taiwan. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2009, 108, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jackson, S.T.; Mullings, A.M.; Rainford, L.; Miller, A. The epidemiology of mycotic vulvovaginitis and the use of antifungal agents in suspected mycotic vulvovaginitis and its implications for clinical practice. West Indian Med. J. 2005, 54, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Horowitz, B.J. Mycotic vulvovaginitis: A broad overview. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991, 165, 1188–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Gibbs, D.L.; Newell, V.A.; Ellis, D.; Tullio, V.; Rodloff, A.; Fu, W.; Ling, T.A.; Global Antifungal Surveillance Group. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: A 10.5-Year Analysis of Susceptibilities of Candida Species to Fluconazole and Voriconazole as Determined by CLSI Standardized Disk Diffusion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1366–1377. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Sangaré, I.; Sirima, C.; Bamba, S.; Zida, A.; Cissé, M.; Bazié, W.W.; Sanou, S.; Dao, B.; Menan, H.; Guiguemdé, R.T. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy at three health centers in Burkina Faso. J. Mycol. Med. 2018, 28, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bitew, A.; Abebaw, Y. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: Species distribution of Candida and their antifungal susceptibility pattern. BMC Womens Health 2018, 18, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jimoh, O.; Inabo, H.I.; Yakubu, S.E.; Ankuma, S.J.; Olayinka, A.T. Prevalence and Speciation of Non-albican Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Zaria. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2016, 6, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  60. Alfouzan, W.; Dhar, R.; Ashkanani, H.; Gupta, M.; Rachel, C.; Khan, Z.U. Species spectrum and antifungal susceptibility profile of vaginal isolates of Candida in Kuwait. J. Mycol. Med. 2015, 25, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Shi, X.-Y.; Yang, Y.-P.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, J.-D.; Huang, W.-M.; Fan, Y.-M. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility of 186 Candida isolates from vulvovaginal candidiasis in southern China. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Mahmoudi Rad, M.; Zafarghandi, S.; Abbasabadi, B.; Tavallaee, M. The epidemiology of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in an Iranian patient population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011, 155, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ahmad, A.; Khan, A.U. Prevalence of Candida species and potential risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aligarh, India. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2009, 144, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ozcan, S.K.; Budak, F.; Yucesoy, G.; Susever, S.; Willke, A. Prevalence, susceptibility profile and proteinase production of yeasts causing vulvovaginitis in Turkish women. APMIS 2006, 114, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pirotta, M.V.; Garland, S.M. Genital candida species detected in samples from women in Melbourne, Australia, before and after treatment with antibiotics. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 3213–3217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Corsello, S.; Spinillo, A.; Osnengo, G.; Penna, C.; Guaschino, S.; Beltrame, A.; Blasi, N.; Festa, A. An epidemiological survey of vulvovaginal candidiasis in Italy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2003, 110, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ribeiro, M.A.; Dietze, R.; Paula, C.R.; Da Matta, D.A.; Colombo, A.L. Susceptibility profile of vaginal yeast isolates from Brazil. Mycopathologia 2001, 151, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Richardson, J.P.; Ho, J.; Naglik, J.R. Candida-Epithelial Interactions. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Peters, B.M.; Palmer, G.E.; Nash, A.K.; Lilly, E.A.; Fidel, P.L.; Noverr, M.C.; Noverr, M.C. Fungal morphogenetic pathways are required for the hallmark inflammatory response during Candida albicans vaginitis. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Richardson, J.P.; Willems, H.M.E.; Moyes, D.L.; Shoaie, S.; Barker, K.S.; Tan, S.L.; Palmer, G.E.; Hube, B.; Naglik, J.R.; Peters, B.M. Candidalysin drives epithelial signaling, neutrophil recruitment, and immunopathology at the vaginal mucosa. Infect. Immun. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kasper, L.; Seider, K.; Hube, B. Intracellular survival of Candida glabrata in macrophages: Immune evasion and persistence. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Majumdar, T.; Mullick, J.B.; Bir, R.; Roy, J.; Sil, S.K. Determination of virulence factors and biofilm formation among isolates of vulvovaginal candidiasis. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 36, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sobel, J.D.; Muller, G.; Buckley, H.R. Critical role of germ tube formation in the pathogenesis of candidal vaginitis. Infect. Immun. 1984, 44, 576–580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Ghannoum, M.A. Potential Role of Phospholipases in Virulence and Fungal Pathogenesis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Udayalaxmi, J.; Jacob, S.; D’Souza, D. Comparison between virulence factors of Candida Albicans and non-albicans species of Candida isolated from genitourinary tract. J. Clin. Diagnostic Res. 2014, 8, DC15–DC17. [Google Scholar]
  76. Soll, D.R. High-frequency switching in Candida albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1992, 5, 183–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Xu, J.; Schwartz, K.; Bartoces, M.; Monsur, J.; Severson, R.K.; Sobel, J.D. Effect of Antibiotics on Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A MetroNet Study. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2008, 21, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Gunther, L.S.A.; Martins, H.P.R.; Gimenes, F.; De Abreu, A.L.P.; Consolaro, M.E.L.; Svidzinski, T.I.E. Prevalence of Candida albicans and non-albicans isolates from vaginal secretions: Comparative evaluation of colonization, vaginal candidiasis and recurrent vaginal candidiasis in diabetic and non-diabetic women. Sao Paulo Med. J. 2014, 132, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ray, D.; Goswami, R.; Banerjee, U.; Dadhwal, V.; Goswami, D.; Mandal, P.; Sreenivas, V.; Kochupillai, N. Prevalence of Candida glabrata and Its Response to Boric Acid Vaginal Suppositories in Comparison With Oral Fluconazole in Patients With Diabetes and Vulvovaginal candidiasis. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Paulitsch, A.; Weger, W.; Ginter-Hanselmayer, G.; Marth, E.; Buzina, W. A 5-year (2000–2004) epidemiological survey of Candida and non-Candida yeast species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis in Graz, Austria. Mycoses 2006, 49, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Vermitsky, J.-P.; Self, M.J.; Chadwick, S.G.; Trama, J.P.; Adelson, M.E.; Mordechai, E.; Gygax, S.E. Survey of vaginal-flora Candida species isolates from women of different age groups by use of species-specific PCR detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1501–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Na, D.; Weiping, L.; Enfeng, Z.; Chan, W.; Zhaozhao, X.; Honghui, Z. Risk factors for Candida infection of the genital tract in the tropics. Afr. Health Sci. 2014, 14, 835–839. [Google Scholar]
  83. Shaaban, O.M.; Abbas, A.M.; Moharram, A.M.; Farhan, M.M.; Hassanen, I.H. Does vaginal douching affect the type of candidal vulvovaginal infection? Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Masri, S.N.; Noor, S.M.; Mat Nor, L.A.; Osman, M.; Rahman, M.M. Candida isolates from pregnant women and their antifungal susceptibility in a Malaysian tertiary-care hospital. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 31, 658–661. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Olowe, O.A.; Makanjuola, O.B.; Olowe, R.; Adekanle, D.A. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis and bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Southwestern Nigeria. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 4, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Guzel, A.B.; Ilkit, M.; Burgut, R.; Urunsak, İ.F.; Ozgunen, F.T. An Evaluation of Risk Factors in Pregnant Women with Candida Vaginitis and the Diagnostic Value of Simultaneous Vaginal and Rectal Sampling. Mycopathologia 2011, 172, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sharma, M.; Solanki, A. Prevalence of Candida infection in pregnant women with and without diabetes. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 605–610. [Google Scholar]
  88. Higashide, K.; Aman, R.; Yamamuro, O. Clinical Characteristics Correlated with Different Fungi Causing Vulvovaginal Mycosis. Mycoses 1988, 31, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sobel, J.D.; Ohmit, S.E.; Schuman, P.; Klein, R.S.; Mayer, K.; Duerr, A.; Vazquez, J.A.; Rompalo, A. The Evolution of Candida Species and Fluconazole Susceptibility among Oral and Vaginal Isolates Recovered from Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)—Seropositive and At-Risk HIV-Seronegative Women. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 183, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D.; Peng, G.; Steele-Moore, L.; Schuman, P.; Holloway, W.; Neaton, J.D. Evolution of Vaginal Candida Species Recovered from Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Women Receiving Fluconazole Prophylaxis: The Emergence of Candida glabrata? Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999, 28, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ryan, K.J. Candida, Aspergillus and other opportunistic fungi. In Sherris Medical Microbiology: An Introduction to Infectious Diseases, 4th ed.; Kenneth, J.R., Ray, C.G., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 659–669. ISBN 0071502386. [Google Scholar]
  92. Pfaller, M.A.; Preston, T.; Bale, M.; Koontz, F.P.; Body, B.A. Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 2054–2058. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Warnock, D.W. Fungi. In Medical Microbiology: A Guide to Microbial Infections: Pathogenesis, Immunity, Laboratory Diagnosis and Control, 18th ed.; Greenwood, D., Slack, R.C., Barer, M.R., Irving, W.L., Eds.; Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier: Edinburgh, UK, 2012; pp. 633–659. ISBN 9780702040894. [Google Scholar]
  94. Odds, F.C.; Bernaerts, R. CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1994, 32, 1923–1929. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  95. Howel, S.A.; Hazen, K.C.; Brandt, M.E. Candida, Cryptococcus and other yeasts of medical importance. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 11th ed.; Jorgensen, J.H., Pfaller, M.A., Carroll, K.C., Funke, G., Landry, M.L., Richter, S.S., Warnock, D.W., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington DC, USA, 2015; pp. 1984–2014. ISBN 9781555817374. [Google Scholar]
  96. Mårdh, P.-A.; Novikova, N.; Witkin, S.S.; Korneeva, I.; Rodriques, A.R. Detection of candida by polymerase chain reaction vs microscopy and culture in women diagnosed as recurrent vulvovaginal cases. Int. J. STD AIDS 2003, 14, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Patterson, T.F.; Revankar, S.G.; Kirkpatrick, W.R.; Dib, O.; Fothergill, A.W.; Redding, S.W.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G. Simple method for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts with chromogenic agar. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 1794–1797. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Parija, S.C. Textbook of Practical Microbiology, 1st ed.; Ahuja Publishers: New Delhi, India, 2006; pp. 211–238. [Google Scholar]
  99. Hu, Y.; Yu, A.; Chen, X.; Wang, G.; Feng, X. Molecular Characterization of Candida africana in Genital Specimens in Shanghai, China. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  100. Borman, A.M.; Szekely, A.; Linton, C.J.; Palmer, M.D.; Brown, P.; Johnson, E.M. Epidemiology, antifungal susceptibility, and pathogenicity of Candida africana isolates from the United Kingdom. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 967–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ells, R.; Kock, J.L.F.; Pohl, C.H. Candida albicans or Candida dubliniensis? Mycoses 2011, 54, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Theill, L.; Dudiuk, C.; Morano, S.; Gamarra, S.; Nardin, M.E.; Méndez, E.; Garcia-Effron, G. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans and its related species Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana isolated from vulvovaginal samples in a hospital of Argentina. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2016, 48, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Reiss, F.; Szilagyi, G. Chlamydospore formation of Candida albicans comparative studies on special media. Dermatologica 1965, 131, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Verweij, P.E.; Breuker, I.M.; Rijs, M.M.; Meis, G.M. Comparative study of seven commercial yeast identification systems. J. Clin. Pathol. 1999, 52, 271–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Posteraro, B.; Efremov, L.; Leoncini, E.; Amore, R.; Posteraro, P.; Ricciardi, W.; Sanguinetti, M. Are the Conventional Commercial Yeast Identification Methods Still Helpful in the Era of New Clinical Microbiology Diagnostics? A Meta-Analysis of Their Accuracy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 2439–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Meletiadis, J.; Arabatzis, M.; Bompola, M.; Tsiveriotis, K.; Hini, S.; Petinaki, E.; Velegraki, A.; Zerva, L. Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2722–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Sobel, J.D.; Akins, R.A. The Role of PCR in the Diagnosis of Candida Vulvovaginitis-a New Gold Standard? Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2015, 17, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mahmoudi Rad, M.; Zafarghandi, A.S.; Amel Zabihi, M.; Tavallaee, M.; Mirdamadi, Y. Identification of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis by multiplex PCR. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 2012, 872169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, J.; Hung, G.-C.; Nagamine, K.; Li, B.; Tsai, S.; Lo, S.-C. Development of Candida-Specific Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection and Identification of Eight Medically Important Candida Species. Microbiol. Insights 2016, 9, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Adjapong, G.; Hale, M.; Garrill, A. A comparative investigation of azole susceptibility in Candida isolates from vulvovaginal candidiasis and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis patients in Ghana. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 686–689. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Alexander, B.D.; Procop, G.W.; Dufresne, P.; Fuller, J.; Fothergill, A.W.; Ghannoum, M.A.; Hanson, K.E.; Holliday, D.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; et al. Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 1st ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–14. ISBN 1-56238-829-0. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pfaller, M.A.; Diekema, D.J.; Messer, S.A.; Boyken, L.; Hollis, R.J. Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by Broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods: Report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Mohanty, S.; Xess, I.; Hasan, F.; Kapil, A.; Mittal, S.; Tolosa, J.E. Prevalence & susceptibility to fluconazole of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis. Indian J. Med. Res. 2007, 126, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Lynch, M.E.; Sobel, J.D. Comparative in vitro activity of antimycotic agents against pathogenic vaginal yeast isolates. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 1994, 32, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 62, e1–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Sobel, J.D. Treatment of vaginal Candida infections. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2002, 3, 1059–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Powell, A.M.; Gracely, E.; Nyirjesy, P. Non-albicans Candida Vulvovaginitis. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 2016, 20, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mendling, W.; Brasch, J. Guideline vulvovaginal candidosis (2010) of the german society for gynecology and obstetrics, the working group for infections and infectimmunology in gynecology and obstetrics, the german society of dermatology, the board of german dermatologists and the. Mycoses 2012, 55, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Sobel, J.D.; Chaim, W.; Nagappan, V.; Leaman, D. Treatment of vaginitis caused by Candida glabrata: Use of topical boric acid and flucytosine. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 189, 1297–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Phillips, A.J. Treatment of non-albicans Candida vaginitis with amphotericin B vaginal suppositories. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 192, 2009–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Nyirjesy, P.; Alexander, A.B.; Weitz, M.V. Vaginal Candida parapsilosis: Pathogen or bystander? Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 13, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Xiao, M.; Fan, X.; Chen, S.C.A.; Wang, H.; Sun, Z.Y.; Liao, K.; Chen, S.L.; Yan, Y.; Kang, M.; Hu, Z.D.; et al. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida glabrata species complex, Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis species complex and Candida tropicalis causing invasive candidiasis in China: 3 year national surveillance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Sobel, J.D.; Wiesenfeld, H.C.; Martens, M.; Danna, P.; Hooton, T.M.; Rompalo, A.; Sperling, M.; Livengood, C.; Horowitz, B.; Von Thron, J.; et al. Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Sobel, J.D. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Reid, G.; Jass, J.; Sebulsky, M.T.; John, K.; Mccormick, J.K. Potential Uses of Probiotics in Clinical Practice Potential Uses of Probiotics in Clinical Practice. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 658–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Falagas, M.E.; Betsi, G.I.; Athanasiou, S. Probiotics for prevention of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: A review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 58, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Shalev, E.; Battino, S.; Weiner, E.; Colodner, R.; Keness, Y. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus compared with pasteurized yogurt as prophylaxis for recurrent candidal vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis. Arch. Fam. Med. 1996, 5, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Epidemiology of non albicans vaginal candidiasis.
Table 1. Epidemiology of non albicans vaginal candidiasis.
Author (Reference)YearCountryPrevalence of Vulvovaginal CandidiasisProportion of C. albicans (%)Proportion of Non Albicans Candida Species (%)
C. glabrataC. tropicalisC. kruseiC. parapsilosisOthers
Bitew and Abebaw [58]2018Ethiopia41.458.63.42.317.22.313.9
Jimoh et al. [59]2016Nigeria40.848.59.211.1-31.3-
Alfouzan et al. [60]2015Kuwait13.273.919.80.960.960.961.9
Shi et al. [61]2015China6191.44.33.2-1.1-
Kumari et al. [23]2013India30.832.422.5--45.1-
Mahmoudi Rad et al. [62] 2011Iran-6718.36.85.81.60.5
Ahmad et al. [63]2009India20.546.936.72.81.4-1.9
Ozcan et al. [64]2006Turkey35751473.5--
Pirotta et al. [65]2006Australia217320--5-
De vos et al. [27]2005Belgium77.9782.6---18.6
Corsello et al. [66]2003Italy43.577.114.6-4--
Ribeiro et al. [67]2001Brazil6090442--

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Makanjuola, O.; Bongomin, F.; Fayemiwo, S.A. An Update on the Roles of Non-albicans Candida Species in Vulvovaginitis. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 121. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof4040121

AMA Style

Makanjuola O, Bongomin F, Fayemiwo SA. An Update on the Roles of Non-albicans Candida Species in Vulvovaginitis. Journal of Fungi. 2018; 4(4):121. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof4040121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Makanjuola, Olufunmilola, Felix Bongomin, and Samuel A. Fayemiwo. 2018. "An Update on the Roles of Non-albicans Candida Species in Vulvovaginitis" Journal of Fungi 4, no. 4: 121. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jof4040121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop