Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
NAC Transcription Factors in Senescence: From Molecular Structure to Function in Crops
Previous Article in Journal
Advancements in Root Growth Measurement Technologies and Observation Capabilities for Container-Grown Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Senescence Meets Dedifferentiation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 4
Issue 3
10.3390/plants4030393
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Senescence, Stress, and Reactive Oxygen Species

by
Ivan Jajic
1,
Tadeusz Sarna
2 and
Kazimierz Strzalka
1,3,*
1
Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Gronostajowa 7, Krakow 30-387, Poland
2
Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Gronostajowa 7, Krakow 30-387, Poland
3
Malopolska Centre of Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Gronostajowa 7, Krakow 30-387, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2015, 4(3), 393-411; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants4030393
Submission received: 4 May 2015 / Revised: 16 June 2015 / Accepted: 18 June 2015 / Published: 8 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Senescence)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the earliest responses of plant cells to various biotic and abiotic stresses. ROS are capable of inducing cellular damage by oxidation of proteins, inactivation of enzymes, alterations in the gene expression, and decomposition of biomembranes. On the other hand, they also have a signaling role and changes in production of ROS can act as signals that change the transcription of genes that favor the acclimation of plants to abiotic stresses. Among the ROS, it is believed that H2O2 causes the largest changes in the levels of gene expression in plants. A wide range of plant responses has been found to be triggered by H2O2 such as acclimation to drought, photooxidative stress, and induction of senescence. Our knowledge on signaling roles of singlet oxygen (1O2) has been limited by its short lifetime, but recent experiments with a flu mutant demonstrated that singlet oxygen does not act primarily as a toxin but rather as a signal that activates several stress-response pathways. In this review we summarize the latest progress on the signaling roles of ROS during senescence and abiotic stresses and we give a short overview of the methods that can be used for their assessment.

1. Introduction

Senescence in plants is a complex deterioration process that can lead to the death of whole organisms or a single organ. It is regulated by autonomous (internal) factors (age, reproductive development, and phytohormone levels) and by environmental signals, including photoperiod, stresses such as drought, ozone, nutrient deficiency, wounding, and shading [1]. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is one of the earliest responses of plant cells under abiotic stresses and senescence [2,3]. In plants, ROS are formed as byproducts of aerobic energy metabolism and of plants being exposed to various biotic and abiotic stresses [4,5,6]. Under normal conditions, the production of ROS in cells is maintained at low levels by antioxidant enzymes. This balance can be disrupted by a depletion of antioxidants or the excess accumulation of ROS, leading to oxidative stress, and consequently to damage to cellular macromolecules and membranes and an increase in lipid peroxidation [7,8]. ROS-induced oxidative stress limits agricultural yields worldwide [9]; in the United States alone, it is estimated that the deleterious effects of abiotic stresses on agricultural production are responsible for losses amounting to billions of dollars annually [10]. Plants have evolved different mechanisms to protect themselves from adverse environmental conditions, such as the process of acclimation, which involves less ROS production coupled with an efficient antioxidant defense [11,12] and the activation of different signaling pathways [13,14].
Initially, ROS were exclusively considered toxic metabolic products that can damage cellular components, but now it is clear that ROS play a dual role in plants both as toxic compounds and as key regulators of many biological processes [15,16,17]. The important role of ROS in signaling has been demonstrated in many studies. It has been shown that ROS modulate the activity of key signaling compounds such as MAP kinases [18], provide protection against pathogen invasion [19,20], stimulate abiotic stress tolerance [21], and have an important role during early responses to wounding [22]. Despite the importance of ROS, our knowledge of the mechanism of their action is still limited. In this review we will try to summarize the latest progress on the roles of reactive oxygen species during senescence and abiotic stresses.

2. ROS Detection

The main problem with an accurate determination of the role of ROS in senescence and abiotic stresses is the simultaneous generation of ROS [23,24] and the limited number of non-invasive and specific methods that can be used for their determination. For example, in plants suffering from moderate light stress singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide anion (O•2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are released simultaneously [23], making it difficult to establish their individual roles. This is further complicated by significant differences in the production of ROS when senescence is induced artificially and when the plant ages naturally [25]. The effects of H2O2 on gene expression have also been reported to be different when the H2O2 was applied exogenously and when it was induced in response to high light [26]. Finally, several studies revealed that multiple stressors, as usually encountered by plants in nature, could substantially change the expression patterns of genes determined in a single factor analysis [27,28,29,30]. There is a need for an experimental model that can take into account all the factors that can influence the outcome of research into the role of ROS.
There are a great number of user-friendly assays that can be used for the measurement of ROS production in plant tissues, including the fluorometric determination of H2O2 with Amplex Red [31] and the colorimetric determination of O•2− with XTT [32]. Although easy to use, these methods lack specificity. This is because Amplex Red is somewhat unstable—it can be autooxidized and produce O•2− and H2O2 [33], and it can react not only with H2O2 but also with other redox active compounds [34], while XTT can be reduced by short-chain sugars [35]. Higher specificity can be achieved by using the spin trapping technique by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Spin trapping involves the reaction between a nitrone or nitroso compound and a free radical to form a stable spin adduct [36]. The spin adduct usually yields a distinctive EPR spectrum characteristic of the particular free radical that is trapped. Under normal conditions, the flux of ROS generated in cells is maintained at low levels by the action of antioxidant enzymes and low molecular weight antioxidants, making the detection of ROS difficult. In order to successfully detect ROS, an imbalance between the production of ROS and their decay needs to be created. This can be achieved by the illumination of samples with visible light in the presence of an appropriate spin trap or with the addition of the spin trap immediately after illumination [37,38,39,40]. There are numerous publications with detailed descriptions of how to use EPR spectroscopy for the detection of hydrogen peroxide [39], the superoxide anion [40], the hydroxyl radical [41], and singlet oxygen [38] in plant tissues. One of the limitations of spin trapping is that the method does not provide information on the specific sites of ROS production in tissues due to solvent incompatibility with living tissue and high concentrations of spin traps needed [42], Also, it typically underestimates actual in situ ROS concentrations because only a small fraction of the radicals produced is usually trapped [43]. Non-invasive, in vivo measurement of ROS can be achieved using fluorescent probes in combination with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) [44] or fluorescence microscopy [45,46,47]. One advantage of CLSM methodology is the possibility of studying the intracellular location of ROS using simultaneously specific fluorescent probes for different organelles. 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) can be used for monitoring H2O2 in plant tissues [48]; however, it lacks specificity since it was demonstrated that it can also react with other peroxides [49]. Dihydroethidium (DHE) is a more specific probe that can be used for detection of O•2− in different plant tissues [50,51]. The determination of singlet oxygen with a singlet oxygen sensor green (SOSG) reagent showed high specificity to 1O2 without the interference of hydroxyl radicals or superoxide [46]. Unfortunately, even in the absence of external 1O2 photosensitisers, the indicator can be converted to its green fluorescent form upon exposure to either UV or visible radiation. This could obviously lead to a wrong estimation of 1O2 levels [52]. Real-time monitoring of reactive oxygen species in living cells and tissues can be achieved with a genetically encoded redox probe such as HyPer and reduction-oxidation sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFPs) [53]. These probes offer high specificity and can be used for determination of ROS in various subcellular compartments. HyPer is highly sensitive to hydrogen peroxide, is insensitive to other oxidants, and it does not cause artifactual ROS generation, thus having great potential in plant biology [54], while roGFP can be used for determination of H2O2, but also for determination of thiol redox state depending on its form [53]. Disadvantages of these probes include the necessity of pH control and possible antioxidant activity, which need to be taken into consideration [53]. In Table 1 we summarize the methods that can be used for measurement of ROS production in plant samples.
Table
Table 1. Overview of the methods for determination of ROS in plan samples.
Table 1. Overview of the methods for determination of ROS in plan samples.
Method/ProbeAdvantageDisadvantageUsed for
Amplex RedEasy to use and fastCan be autooxidized, reacts with other redox reactive compoundsH2O2
XTTEasy to use and fastNon-specific, can be reduced by short-chain sugarsO•2−
EPR spin trappingHighly specific, can be used for determination of numerous ROSExpensive, laborious, method does not provide information on the specific sites of ROS production in tissuesH2O2, O•2−, 1O2, OH−
DCF – DAIn vivo determination of intracellular ROS productionNon-specific, reacts with other peroxides, expensive equipmentH2O2
DHEIn vivo determination of intracellular ROS productionExpensive equipmentO•2−
SOSGIn vivo determination of intracellular ROS productionWrong estimation of 1O2 upon exposure to visible or UV light1O2
HyPer and roGFPReal time monitoring of ROS in living cells and tissuesNecessity for pH control and possible antioxidant activityH2O2

3. Superoxide Anion

In plants O•2− is generated in different cell compartments, including chloroplasts, peroxisomes, apoplast, the mitochondrial electron transport chain, and the plasma membrane [55,56,57]. The primary source of the superoxide anion in chloroplasts are Mehler reactions, during which O2 is reduced by electrons from the photosynthetic electron transport chain [58]. Generated O•2− is then converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), mostly by the action of CuZn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) [59]. Thus, SOD determines the lifetime of O•2− in cells and the probability of its involvement in biochemical processes. Furthermore, O•2− is a moderately reactive, short-lived ROS with a half-life of approximately 2–4 µs [17], and it cannot cross the chloroplast membrane [60]. For the reasons listed above, a signaling role of O•2− during senescence and abiotic stresses seems unconvincing. However, chloroplasts are not the only sites of O•2− production. In peroxisomes, O•2− is being generated by two different sources: in peroxisomal matrix via action of enzyme xanthine oxidase [61,62] and by electron transport chain (ETC) in peroxisomal membrane [63]. Peroxisomes can be considered as an important source of signaling molecules since they have capacity to rapidly produce and scavenge H2O2 and O•2− due to the presence of many antioxidants in these organelles. Another important source of O•2− in plant cells are NADPH oxidases (NOX), in plants commonly known as respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rbohs), which catalyze the production of O•2− [64,65]. Plant Rbohs have been intensively studied recently since they play key roles in many physiological processes, such as ROS signaling and stress responses [66,67]. Finally, O•2− is also produced in cytosol by action of xanthine dehydrogenase and the aldehyde oxidase [68,69]. Numerous studies have reported an increase in the production of O•2− during natural and artificially induced senescence [70,71]; however, attributing a specific signaling role to this increase is extremely difficult since the increase in most cases is accompanied by the production of other ROS and the quick conversion of O•2− to H2O2. High production of ROS is damaging to the cell due to oxidative modifications of key cellular components and may ultimately lead to plant cell death [72]. In a recent study [73] it was shown that under the high temperature treatments, large amounts of O•2− and H2O2 were generated and accumulated in cucumber leaves, leading to premature senescence, which is indicated by the changes in protein, lipid peroxidation (LPO), and chlorophyll content. Nevertheless, a signaling role of O•2− was demonstrated in Arabidopsis thaliana plants exposed to methyl viologen, a superoxide anion propagator, under light. The generation of O•2− in the absence of H2O2 accumulation revealed a subset of nuclear encoded genes that are likely to be specific for an O•2−-mediated signaling pathway [74]. Data analysis identified a strong upregulation of genes belonging to categories functioning in abiotic stress responses, among them WRKY6, which has previously been reported to play a role during senescence and in defense-related processes [75]. Recently, we investigated the production of O•2− during the development and senescence of secondary barley leaves by using EPR––a spin trapping method with DMPO as a spin trap [76]. It was shown that the production of O•2− increases during the development of barley, reaching its highest level right after the onset of senescence. Thereafter, the production of O•2− started to decline till the end of the senescence process. This was accompanied with an increase in membrane fluidity during the same period [77], which could be a factor facilitating the increase in the generation of ROS. An increase in O•2− was also observed in the interveinal area of senescing tobacco leaves, as well as in the minor veins of mature and senescent leaves, while it was absent in the major veins [78]. It is hypothesized that spatial differences in the superoxide anion are important for the non-uniform downregulation of photosynthesis-associated genes. A further role of O•2− as a signaling molecule was demonstrated during the early wound response in an experiment with Medicago leaves where ROS production was inhibited with diphenyleneiodonium (DPI). The rapid (≤3 min) DPI inhibition of phase I O•2− production suppressed the differential regulation of 7 out of 19 wound responsive proteins, showing that early, wound-related O•2− production (phase I) provides an essential signal for wound-related changes in the leaf apoplast proteome [22]. Increased production of O•2− was observed in plant responses to cadmium stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.) [48]. Exposure to Cd leads to an oxidative stress as a result of disturbance in antioxidant defense and a decrease in NO level. It was demonstrated that NO can mitigate the deleterious effect of Cd on lupine roots [79] and that it has a possible antioxidant effect in its ability to react with O•2− to prevent oxidative damage [80]. In this way, O•2− could contribute to plant responses to abiotic stresses.

4. Hydrogen Peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide plays an important role in plants under stress conditions as a signaling molecule that mediates between different physiological processes [81]. It is involved in the regulation of the senescence process [82], protection against pathogen attack [83], the reduction of stress intensity at low light [84], and the alleviation of drought stress [85], and it can influence the expression of hundreds of genes [86]. Hydrogen peroxide is produced in plants via two possible pathways: dismutation of O•2− with the involvement of SOD [59], and via oxidases such as amino and oxalate oxidases [87]. The level of H2O2 is kept under control by a fine-tuned network of enzymatic and low-molecular-weight antioxidants that prevent the excess accumulation of H2O2 [88]. Production and scavenging of H2O2 in plant cells has been summarized in Figure 1. The balance between SODs and the different H2O2-scavenging enzymes in cells is considered to be crucial in determining the steady-state level of H2O2 [89]. In comparison with other ROS, H2O2 is the most stable and least reactive ROS, and it can easily cross the membrane [81,90], which makes it a good signaling molecule. H2O2 plays a versatile role in plants; as a signaling molecule it is involved in the regulation of various abiotic and biotic stresses [81] and, at high concentrations, it has an important role in cell death and during the final stages of senescence, when it contributes to cell degradation [16,17]. The dual role of H2O2 was confirmed in a recent study, in which treatment with 600 µM H2O2 caused an increase in the vase life of a cut Oriental × Trumpet hybrid lily “Manissa,” while concentrations of 800 and 1200 µM resulted in negative effects [91]. Further evidence that the effects of H2O2 are dose dependent comes from a study in which wax apple trees were spray-treated with different concentrations of H2O2 under field conditions [92]. Spraying wax apple fruits with 5 and 20 mM of H2O2 once a week produced better fruit growth and maximized the yield and quality in comparison with the control and with a higher dose of 50 mM of H2O2.
Plants 04 00393 g001 1024
Figure 1. Production and scavenging of ROS in a plant cell. Figure legend: Superoxide dismutase (SOD); Fenton (decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to highly reactive hydroxyl radical in presence of iron); ETC (electron transport chain).
Figure 1. Production and scavenging of ROS in a plant cell. Figure legend: Superoxide dismutase (SOD); Fenton (decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to highly reactive hydroxyl radical in presence of iron); ETC (electron transport chain).
Plants 04 00393 g001
H2O2 plays an important role during the senescence process, where it was shown that it could be used as a signal to promote senescence in different plant species, and to be part of a complex regulatory network [93]. It was shown that H2O2 increases at the point when the plants start to bolt and flower, which is supported by a decrease in ascorbate peroxidase 1 activity at the same time [16]. This probably induces the expression of transcription factors and senescence-associated genes. Indeed, expression analysis showed that H2O2 treatment induced 14 out of 36 salt-triggered senescence-associated genes and 15 senescence-associated NAC genes [94], indicating that salt-triggered senescence at least in part involves H2O2-mediated signaling through NAC transcription factors. This is supported by studies in which it was demonstrated that H2O2 treatment induces the expression of NAC transcription factors ORS1 [95] JUB1 [96] and ATAF1 [97], which have a significant impact on progression of senescence. Overexpression of ORS1 triggers the expression of senescence-associated genes and accelerates senescence in transgenic plants, whereas its inhibition delays it. Contrary to ORS1, the overexpression of JUB1 strongly delays senescence, dampens intracellular H2O2 levels, and enhances tolerance to various abiotic stresses. ATAF1 overexpression stimulates the progression of senescence by activating senescence promoting transcription factor ORE1 and repressing chloroplast maintenance transcription factor GLK1. The generation of H2O2 during the development and senescence of barley was investigated in our recent study [76]. The results showed an increase in the production of H2O2 with the development of barley, with the highest levels observed right after the induction of senescence and at the very end of the senescence process, which is similar to the pattern observed in the study discussed above [16]. Our research provides further evidence of the important role of H2O2 during leaf senescence in two different aspects: as a signal molecule for the induction of senescence, and in the degradation of molecules at later stages of senescence.
Several studies have indicated that H2O2 can interplay with other signal molecules that are important for plant development and during senescence such as abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene [12,98]. It was shown that H2O2 could be involved in the signaling of plant growth regulators such as ethephon [98]. The application of ethephon results in an elevation in H2O2 levels, which is accompanied by the increased expression of sweet potato catalase. The elimination of H2O2 influence by exogenous-reduced glutathione alleviates ethephon-mediated effects. Recently, the interaction between ABA, H2O2, and ascorbic acid in Mediterranean shrubs during summer drought was investigated. It was shown that the drought stress–ABA–H2O2 interaction can induce an increase in ascorbic acid, maintaining and even decreasing the ascorbate oxidative status under summer drought conditions, thereby protecting plants from oxidative damage.
There are numerous studies demonstrating the important role of H2O2 in the acquisition of tolerance to different abiotic and biotic stresses [84,85,99,100]. It was recently shown that pre-treatment with H2O2 provides protection against heat stress and low light induced oxidative stress by modulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes. The exogenous application of H2O2 can induce tolerance to heat stress in seedlings of Cucumis sativus cv Lvfeng no. 6 [100]. The pre-treatment of cucumber leaves with H2O2 and heat increased antioxidant enzyme activities, decreased lipid peroxidation, and thus protected the ultrastructure of chloroplasts under heat stress. Similarly, it has been shown that exogenous H2O2 can have a beneficial effect on low light induced oxidative stress [84]. Low light induces an oxidative stress [101], which increases ROS and causes lipid peroxidation. H2O2 pre-treatment of cucumber leaves resulted in decreased levels of O•2−, endogenous H2O2, and malonaldehyde by moderating the activities of antioxidant enzymes, thus reducing lipid peroxidation and stress intensity at low light. Pre-treatment with H2O2 can also increase drought stress tolerance in soybean leaves by promoting the expression of stress-response genes [85]. Exogenous application of H2O2 caused an increase in the mRNA levels of key enzymes for the biosynthesis of oligosaccharides, which are known to help plants tolerate drought stress. This enabled the soybean plant to avoid drought stress through the maintenance of leaf water content and thus to delay foliar wilting. Finally, hydrogen peroxide contributes to defense responses against pathogens. It was demonstrated that H2O2 is important for the greater tolerance of kumquat leaves infected with Xanthomonas axonopodis than that of grapefruit [19]. Infected kumquat leaves have a high accumulation of H2O2, which is promoted by the suppression of ascorbate peroxidase activity and later by the suppression of catalase activity, both involved in maintaining H2O2 at low levels. H2O2 can then be used as a substrate for the higher activity of Class III peroxidase in the apoplast, which is known to be involved in plant defense against pathogens.

5. Singlet Oxygen

Singlet oxygen is the highly reactive, excited state of molecular oxygen that can be formed in a reaction between O2 and the chlorophyll triplet state [102]. Unlike the formation of H2O2 and O•2−, the formation of 1O2 is not accompanied by the transfer of an electron to O2. Instead, one of the unpaired electrons is promoted to a higher energy orbital [103]. Under normal conditions, 1O2 is generated during photosynthesis by the photo activation of photosensitizers, mainly chlorophylls and their precursors [102]. Singlet oxygen is also generated during senescence [25] and under different abiotic stresses [104,105,106]. Similarly to other ROS, 1O2 has a dual effect. As an oxidizing agent it can react with various biological molecules, causing damage and leading to cell death [107]. It can also play a signaling role by activating the expression of different genes [23,108]. As a result of its high reactivity and short lifetime of 3.1 to 3.9 µs in pure water [109], 1O2 is able to interact with molecules mostly in its nearest environment. The diffusion distance of 1O2 has been calculated to be up to 10 nm in a physiologically relevant situation [110]. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that 1O2 is capable of diffusing a distance of over 270 nm in rat nerve cells [111] and that 1O2 produced in the photosynthetic apparatus of C. reinhardtii under high light is capable of leaving the thylakoid membrane and reaching the cytoplasm or even the nucleus [112], which makes its role as a signaling molecule feasible.
Significant progress in the investigation of the role of singlet oxygen in signaling was achieved with the use of a conditional fluorescent (flu) mutant of Arabidopsis that accumulates the photosensitizer protochlorophyllide in the dark and generates singlet oxygen after transfer to light [107,113]. Following illumination with light, a different set of nuclear genes are activated within the flu mutant, and they are different from those induced by O•2− and/or H2O2, suggesting that singlet oxygen does not act primarily as a toxin but rather as a signal that activates several stress-response pathways [107]. Recently, it was reported that 1O2 could be responsible for increased tolerance to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis plants through the action of β-cyclocitral [114]. β-cyclocitral is a β-carotene derivative produced in high light that is able to induce changes in the expression of a large set of genes, which strongly overlap with the network of genes induced by 1O2 [114]. At the same time it has little effect on the expression of H2O2 gene markers. β-cyclocitral-induced reprogramming of gene expression is associated with increased tolerance to photooxidative stress, indicating that β-cyclocitral is a stress signal produced in high light that is able to induce defense mechanisms and represents a likely messenger involved in the 1O2 signaling pathway in plants [114]. Further evidence that 1O2 participates in acclimation to photooxidative stress comes from a study with an npq1lut2 double mutant [106]. The npq1lut2 mutant specifically accumulates 1O2 due to its selective loss of lutein and zeaxanthin, which participate in the quenching and scavenging of 3Chl* and 1O2 [115,116]. Following high light illumination, 1O2 accumulates and modifies the expression of a group of genes encoding chloroplast proteins, leading to a significant change in chloroplast composition and functional modifications. High light induced 1O2 responses were also investigated in an Arabidopsis cell suspension culture (ACSC) containing functional chloroplast [117]. An experiment with different fluorescent probes showed that the high light treated cultures emitted fluorescence that corresponded with the production of 1O2. This was accompanied by significant changes in the expression of transcripts specifically upregulated by 1O2, which leads us to conclude that 1O2 plays an important role in the initiation of defense responses to high light.
Plants 04 00393 g002 1024
Figure 2. Possible roles of ROS during senescence and abiotic stresses.
Figure 2. Possible roles of ROS during senescence and abiotic stresses.
Plants 04 00393 g002
When it comes to senescence, our knowledge on the signaling role of the 1O2 is limited by the scarcity of the research relevant to the topic. There is general agreement that ROS production increases during senescence [2,3]. However, the increase in 1O2 is observed simultaneously with that of other ROS, making it difficult to isolate the role of 1O2. It was reported that 1O2 is the main cause of senescence-associated oxidative stress in chloroplasts of sage [118]. However, this was concluded on the basis of the strong degradation of β-carotene and α-tocopherol in drought-stressed plants, which suggests the enhanced formation of singlet oxygen. In addition, in a recent study, a mass generation of singlet oxygen was measured in the early stages of hormone-treated barley but then declined, while in naturally senescing plants there was continuous production of low amounts of singlet oxygen [25]. Together with an increase in 1O2, artificially senescing plants contained oxidative breakdown products of β-carotene such as β-cyclocistral, which is a possible messenger involved in the 1O2 signaling pathway in plants [114], while the same was undetectable in a naturally senescing plant. Similar results were observed in our recent study, where it was shown that during the development and senescence of secondary barley leaves there is a continuous production of low amounts of 1O2 [76]. Another possible role of 1O2 could be its contribution to an increase in lipid peroxidation (LPO), leading to cell death. It is well known that with advancing senescence there is a notable increase in LPO [119,120]. Recently, it has been reported that in optimal growth conditions 1O2 was responsible for more than 80% of the non-enzymatic LPO in Arabidopsis leaf tissues [121]. Lipid peroxidation leads to the generation of free radicals, which can lead to the promotion of senescence [122]. This in turn leads to an increase in lipoxygenase activity, which can further increase LPO and also form 1O2 [123], leading to overproduction of 1O2. Indeed, it was showed that in Arabidopsis mutants favoring 1O2 production, photooxidative stress led to a dramatic increase in LPO preceding cell death [121]. Possible roles of ROS during senescence and stress are summarized in Figure 2.

6. Conclusions

In this review we have given a short overview on the possible role of three classes of ROS during senescence and abiotic stresses. ROS play an important role in different plant processes ranging from plant stress adaptation to defense against pathogen attack. In the ROS family, the signaling roles of H2O2 have been most thoroughly studied due to its relative stability and ability to diffuse through membranes. It has been demonstrated that H2O2 plays various roles in plant growth, development, and metabolism. It has an important role during the senescence process, where it was shown that it could be used as a signal to promote senescence and during the acquisition of tolerance to different abiotic and biotic stresses. In comparison with H2O2, the superoxide anion is less stable and cannot cross the membrane, which makes it less suitable as a signal molecule. Nevertheless, an important signaling role of O•2− was demonstrated when it was shown that the generation of O•2− in the absence of H2O2 leads to a strong upregulation of the genes that function in abiotic stress responses and during senescence. Finally, in recent years, with the discovery of a flu mutant, it was demonstrated that 1O2 is capable of activating a set of nuclear genes different from those activated by O•2− and H2O2 and that it plays an important role in plant responses to light.
At present, only the role of H2O2 during senescence and abiotic stresses has been extensively studied, while the role of other ROS remains to be further clarified. In recent years there has been significant progress in this area, with development of new techniques and technologies, but still there is no ideal technique that can be applied to a variety of systems and to specific ROS classes. EPR spectrometry can be used to measure specific ROS species but it requires a thorough sample preparation, which prevents the measurement of specific sites of ROS production in tissues. On the other hand, genetically-encoded redox probes can be used to measure ROS production in different cell compartments in vivo but they often do not differentiate between different classes of ROS. Moreover, most of the papers investigate the impact of a group of ROS, while the contribution of individual ROS remains questionable. Significant progress in the future can be made on the signaling roles of O•2− and 1O2 during senescence. Roles of these two classes during this important process have not yet been sufficiently investigated and many questions wait to be answered. Already it has been shown that O•2− upregulates some of the genes that are important during senescence such as WRKY6, but not much more is known. Similarly, the role of 1O2 during senescence is limited to its contribution to cell death, while several studies reported that production of this species remains unchanged during natural senescence. Whether this is true or not remains to be seen.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the EU in the frame of Marie Curie Actions (MC-ITN-CropLife; Nr 24394).
The Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Biotechnology of Jagiellonian University is a partner of the Leading National Research Center (KNOW), supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper. Ivan Jajic wrote the manuscript; Tadeusz Sarna and Kazimierz Strzalka supervised the work and gave final corrections and valuable input on how to improve it.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gan, S.; Amasino, R.M. Making sense of senescence (molecular genetic regulation and manipulation of leaf senescence). Plant. Physiol. 1997, 113, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, S.; Seo, P.J.; Lee, H.J.; Park, C.M. A nac transcription factor ntl4 promotes reactive oxygen species production during drought-induced leaf senescence in arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012, 70, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Prochazkova, D.; Sairam, R.K.; Srivastava, G.C.; Singh, D.V. Oxidative stress and antioxidant activity as the basis of senescence in maize leaves. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Selote, D.S.; Khanna-Chopra, R. Drought acclimation confers oxidative stress tolerance by inducing co-ordinated antioxidant defense at cellular and subcellular level in leaves of wheat seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 127, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, E.N.; Ferreira-Silva, S.L.; Fontenele, A.D.V.; Ribeiro, R.V.; Viégas, R.A.; Silveira, J.A.G. Photosynthetic changes and protective mechanisms against oxidative damage subjected to isolated and combined drought and heat stresses in Jatropha curcas plants. J. Plant Phsiol. 2010, 167, 1157–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Choudhury, S.; Panda, P.; Sahoo, L.; Panda, S.K. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e23681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Río, L.A.D.; Pastori, G.M.; Palma, J.M.; Sandalio, L.M.; Sevilla, F.; Corpas, F.J.; Jiménez, A.; López-Huertas, E.; Hernández, J.A. The activated oxygen role of peroxisomes in senescence. Plant Physiol. 1998, 116, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Lushchak, V.I. Adaptive response to oxidative stress: Bacteria, fungi, plants and animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Toxicol. Pharmacol. CBP 2011, 153, 175–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ashraf, M. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mittler, R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Khanna-Chopra, R.; Selote, D.S. Acclimation to drought stress generates oxidative stress tolerance in drought-resistant than -susceptible wheat cultivar under field conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jubany-Mari, T.; Munne-Bosch, S.; Lopez-Carbonell, M.; Alegre, L. Hydrogen peroxide is involved in the acclimation of the mediterranean shrub, cistus albidus l., to summer drought. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, L.; Su, H.; Han, L.; Wang, C.; Sun, Y.; Liu, F. Differential expression profiles of poplar map kinase kinases in response to abiotic stresses and plant hormones, and overexpression of PtMKK4 improves the drought tolerance of poplar. Gene 2014, 545, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suzuki, N.; Koussevitzky, S.; Mittler, R.; Miller, G. Ros and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: A re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1056–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zimmermann, P.; Heinlein, C.; Orendi, G.; Zentgraf, U. Senescence-specific regulation of catalases in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dat, J.; Vandenabeele, S.; Vranová, E.; van Montagu, M.; Inzé, D.; van Breusegem, F. Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rentel, M.C.; Lecourieux, D.; Ouaked, F.; Usher, S.L.; Petersen, L.; Okamoto, H.; Knight, H.; Peck, S.C.; Grierson, C.S.; Hirt, H.; et al. Oxi1 kinase is necessary for oxidative burst-mediated signalling in arabidopsis. Nature 2004, 427, 858–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kumar, N.; Ebel, R.C.; Roberts, P.D. H2O2 degradation is suppressed in kumquat leaves infected with xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Citri. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dias, C.V.; Mendes, J.S.; dos Santos, A.C.; Pirovani, C.P.; da Silva Gesteira, A.; Micheli, F.; Gramacho, K.P.; Hammerstone, J.; Mazzafera, P.; de Mattos Cascardo, J.C. Hydrogen peroxide formation in cacao tissues infected by the hemibiotrophic fungus Moniliophthora perniciosa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 49, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Golldack, D.; Li, C.; Mohan, H.; Probst, N. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Soares, N.C.; Wojtkowska, J.; Jackson, P.A. A proteomic analysis of the wound response in medicago leaves reveals the early activation of a ros-sensitive signal pathway. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1411–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Laloi, C.; Stachowiak, M.; Pers-Kamczyc, E.; Warzych, E.; Murgia, I.; Apel, K. Cross-talk between singlet oxygen- and hydrogen peroxide-dependent signaling of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hideg, E.; Barta, C.; Kalai, T.; Vass, I.; Hideg, K.; Asada, K. Detection of singlet oxygen and superoxide with fluorescent sensors in leaves under stress by photoinhibition or uv radiation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Springer, A.; Acker, G.; Bartsch, S.; Bauerschmitt, H.; Reinbothe, S.; Reinbothe, C. Differences in gene expression between natural and artificially induced leaf senescence in barley. J. Plant Pysiol. 2015, 176, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Golemiec, E.; Tokarz, K.; Wielanek, M.; Niewiadomska, E. A dissection of the effects of ethylene, h2o2 and high irradiance on antioxidants and several genes associated with stress and senescence in tobacco leaves. J. Plant Pysiol. 2014, 171, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Shuman, J.; Shulaev, V.; Davletova, S.; Mittler, R. When defense pathways collide. The response of arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rizhsky, L.; Liang, H.; Mittler, R. The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Prasch, C.M.; Sonnewald, U. Simultaneous application of heat, drought and virus to Arabidopsis thaliana plants reveals significant shifts in signaling networks. Plant Physiol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Atkinson, N.J.; Lilley, C.J.; Urwin, P.E. Identification of genes involved in the response of arabidopsis to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 2028–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhou, M.; Diwu, Z.; Panchuk-Voloshina, N.; Haugland, R.P. A stable nonfluorescent derivative of resorufin for the fluorometric determination of trace hydrogen peroxide: Applications in detecting the activity of phagocyte nadph oxidase and other oxidases. Anal. Biochem. 1997, 253, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Frahry, G.; Schopfer, P. Nadh-stimulated, cyanide-resistant superoxide production in maize coleoptiles analyzed with a tetrazolium-based assay. Planta 2001, 212, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dikalov, S.; Griendling, K.K.; Harrison, D.G. Measurement of reactive oxygen species in cardiovascular studies. Hypertension 2007, 49, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gomes, A.; Fernandes, E.; Lima, J.L.F.C. Fluorescence probes used for detection of reactive oxygen species. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2005, 65, 45–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Benov, L.; Fridovich, I. Is reduction of the sulfonated tetrazolium 2,3-bis (2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2-tetrazolium 5-carboxanilide a reliable measure of intracellular superoxide production? Anal. Biochem. 2002, 310, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Swartz, H.M.; Khan, N.; Khramtsov, V.V. Use of electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to evaluate the redox state in vivo. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2007, 9, 1757–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hideg, E.; Kalai, T.; Hideg, K. Direct detection of free radicals and reactive oxygen species in thylakoids. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 684, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Hideg, É.; Spetea, C.; Vass, I. Singlet oxygen production in thylakoid membranes during photoinhibition as detected by epr spectroscopy. Photosynth. Res. 1994, 39, 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mubarakshina, M.M.; Ivanov, B.N.; Naydov, I.A.; Hillier, W.; Badger, M.R.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Production and diffusion of chloroplastic h2o2 and its implication to signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3577–3587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Kós, P.B.; Hideg, É. Superoxide anion radicals generated by methylviologen in photosystem i damage photosystem ii. Physiol. Plant. 2011, 142, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Heyno, E.; Mary, V.; Schopfer, P.; Krieger-Liszkay, A. Oxygen activation at the plasma membrane: Relation between superoxide and hydroxyl radical production by isolated membranes. Planta 2011, 234, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Steffen-Heins, A.; Steffens, B. EPR spectroscopy and its use in planta––A promising technique to disentangle the origin of specific ros. Front. Environ. Sci. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Leister, D. Photosynthesis research protocols. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, vi–vii. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sandalio, L.M.; Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; del Río, L.A. Imaging of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in vivo in plant tissues. Methods Enzymol. 2008, 440, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Fryer, M.J.; Oxborough, K.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Baker, N.R. Imaging of photo-oxidative stress responses in leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1249–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Flors, C.; Fryer, M.J.; Waring, J.; Reeder, B.; Bechtold, U.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Nonell, S.; Wilson, M.T.; Baker, N.R. Imaging the production of singlet oxygen in vivo using a new fluorescent sensor, singlet oxygen sensor green. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1725–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Costa, A.; Drago, I.; Behera, S.; Zottini, M.; Pizzo, P.; Schroeder, J.I.; Pozzan, T.; Lo Schiavo, F. H2O2 in plant peroxisomes: An in vivo analysis uncovers a ca(2+)-dependent scavenging system. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2010, 62, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rodriguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Zabalza, A.; Corpas, F.J.; Gomez, M.; Del Rio, L.A.; Sandalio, L.M. Cadmium effect on oxidative metabolism of pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots. Imaging of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide accumulation in vivo. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1532–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tarpey, M.M.; Wink, D.A.; Grisham, M.B. Methods for detection of reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen: In vitro and in vivo considerations. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, 286, R431–R444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Corpas, F.J.; Fernandez-Ocana, A.; Carreras, A.; Valderrama, R.; Luque, F.; Esteban, F.J.; Rodriguez-Serrano, M.; Chaki, M.; Pedrajas, J.R.; Sandalio, L.M.; et al. The expression of different superoxide dismutase forms is cell-type dependent in olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006, 47, 984–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yamamoto, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Devi, S.R.; Rikiishi, S.; Matsumoto, H. Aluminum toxicity is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and the production of reactive oxygen species in plant cells. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ragas, X.; Jimenez-Banzo, A.; Sanchez-Garcia, D.; Batllori, X.; Nonell, S. Singlet oxygen photosensitisation by the fluorescent probe singlet oxygen sensor green [registered sign]. Chem. Commun. 2009, 28, 2920–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lukyanov, K.A.; Belousov, V.V. Genetically encoded fluorescent redox sensors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hernandez-Barrera, A.; Quinto, C.; Johnson, E.A.; Wu, H.M.; Cheung, A.Y.; Cardenas, L. Using hyper as a molecular probe to visualize hydrogen peroxide in living plant cells: A method with virtually unlimited potential in plant biology. Methods Enzymol. 2013, 527, 275–290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Rhoads, D.M.; Umbach, A.L.; Subbaiah, C.C.; Siedow, J.N. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Contribution to oxidative stress and interorganellar signaling. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sandalio, L.; Rodríguez-Serrano, M.; Romero-Puertas, M.; del Río, L.A. Role of peroxisomes as a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling molecules. Subcell. Biochem. 2013, 69, 231–255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Rosenwasser, S.; Rot, I.; Sollner, E.; Meyer, A.J.; Smith, Y.; Leviatan, N.; Fluhr, R.; Friedman, H. Organelles contribute differentially to reactive oxygen species-related events during extended darkness. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Allen, J.F.; Hall, D.O. Superoxide reduction as a mechanism of ascorbate-stimulated oxygen uptake by isolated chloroplasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1973, 52, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Asada, K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Takahashi, M.A.; Asada, K. Superoxide anion permeability of phospholipid membranes and chloroplast thylakoids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1983, 226, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sandalio, L.M.; Fernandez, V.M.; Ruperez, F.L.; Del Rio, L.A. Superoxide free radicals are produced in glyoxysomes. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Corpas, F.J.; Palma, J.M.; Sandalio, L.M.; Valderrama, R.; Barroso, J.B.; Del Rio, L.A. Peroxisomal xanthine oxidoreductase: Characterization of the enzyme from pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves. J. Plant Pysiol. 2008, 165, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Del Río, L.A.; Donaldson, R.P. Production of superoxide radicals in glyoxysomal membranes from castor bean endosperm. J. Plant Pysiol. 1995, 146, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kaur, G.; Sharma, A.; Guruprasad, K.; Pati, P.K. Versatile roles of plant nadph oxidases and emerging concepts. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sagi, M.; Fluhr, R. Production of reactive oxygen species by plant nadph oxidases. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Torres, M.A.; Dangl, J.L. Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kwak, J.M.; Mori, I.C.; Pei, Z.M.; Leonhardt, N.; Torres, M.A.; Dangl, J.L.; Bloom, R.E.; Bodde, S.; Jones, J.D.; Schroeder, J.I. Nadph oxidase atrbohd and atrbohf genes function in ROS-dependent aba signaling in arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 2623–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zarepour, M.; Kaspari, K.; Stagge, S.; Rethmeier, R.; Mendel, R.; Bittner, F. Xanthine dehydrogenase atxdh1 from Arabidopsis thaliana is a potent producer of superoxide anions via its nadh oxidase activity. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2010, 72, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yesbergenova, Z.; Yang, G.; Oron, E.; Soffer, D.; Fluhr, R.; Sagi, M. The plant mo-hydroxylases aldehyde oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase have distinct reactive oxygen species signatures and are induced by drought and abscisic acid. Plant. J. 2005, 42, 862–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. McRae, D.G.; Thompson, J.E. Senescence-dependent changes in superoxide anion production by illuminated chloroplasts from bean leaves. Planta 1983, 158, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Pastori, G.M.; Del Rio, L.A. Natural senescence of pea leaves (an activated oxygen-mediated function for peroxisomes). Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Van Breusegem, F.; Dat, J.F. Reactive oxygen species in plant cell death. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Zhao, X.; Nishimura, Y.; Fukumoto, Y.; Li, J. Effect of high temperature on active oxygen species, senescence and photosynthetic properties in cucumber leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 70, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Scarpeci, T.E.; Zanor, M.I.; Carrillo, N.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Valle, E.M. Generation of superoxide anion in chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana during active photosynthesis: A focus on rapidly induced genes. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2008, 66, 361–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Robatzek, S.; Somssich, I.E. A new member of the arabidopsis wrky transcription factor family, atwrky6, is associated with both senescence- and defence-related processes. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2001, 28, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jajic, I.; Sarna, T.; Szewczyk, G.; Strzalka, K. Changes in production of reactive oxygen species level in illuminated thylakoids isolated during development and senescence of barley leaf senescence. J. Plant Physiol. 2015. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  77. Jajić, I.; Wiśniewska-Becker, A.; Sarna, T.; Jemioła-Rzemińska, M.; Strzałka, K. EPR spin labeling measurements of thylakoid membrane fluidity during barley leaf senescence. J. Plant Pysiol. 2014, 171, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Niewiadomska, E.; Polzien, L.; Desel, C.; Rozpadek, P.; Miszalski, Z.; Krupinska, K. Spatial patterns of senescence and development-dependent distribution of reactive oxygen species in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. J. Plant Pysiol. 2009, 166, 1057–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Kopyra, M.; Gwóźdź, E.A. Nitric oxide stimulates seed germination and counteracts the inhibitory effect of heavy metals and salinity on root growth of lupinus luteus. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Delledonne, M. Nitric oxide signaling in plant-pathogen interactions. IUBMB Life 2003, 55, 579–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Quan, L.J.; Zhang, B.; Shi, W.W.; Li, H.Y. Hydrogen peroxide in plants: A versatile molecule of the reactive oxygen species network. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Peng, L.T.; Jiang, Y.M.; Yang, S.Z.; Pan, S.Y. Accelerated senescence of fresh-cut chinese water chestnut tissues in relation to hydrogen peroxide accumulation. J. Plant Phsiol. Mol. Biol. 2005, 31, 527–532. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  83. Kumar, N.; Ebel, R.C.; Roberts, P.D. Antioxidant metabolism of grapefruit infected with xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Citri. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhang, X.-L.; Jia, X.-F.; Yu, B.; Gao, Y.; Bai, J.-G. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide influences antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation in cucumber leaves at low light. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 129, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ishibashi, Y.; Yamaguchi, H.; Yuasa, T.; Iwaya-Inoue, M.; Arima, S.; Zheng, S.H. Hydrogen peroxide spraying alleviates drought stress in soybean plants. J. Plant Pysiol. 2011, 168, 1562–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yun, K.-Y.; Park, M.; Mohanty, B.; Herath, V.; Xu, F.; Mauleon, R.; Wijaya, E.; Bajic, V.; Bruskiewich, R.; de los Reyes, B. Transcriptional regulatory network triggered by oxidative signals configures the early response mechanisms of japonica rice to chilling stress. BMC Plant. Biol. 2010, 10, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hu, X.; Bidney, D.L.; Yalpani, N.; Duvick, J.P.; Crasta, O.; Folkerts, O.; Lu, G. Overexpression of a gene encoding hydrogen peroxide-generating oxalate oxidase evokes defense responses in sunflower. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1866–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Yang, T.; Poovaiah, B.W. Hydrogen peroxide homeostasis: Activation of plant catalase by calcium/calmodulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002, 99, 4097–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Liao, W.-B.; Zhang, M.-L.; Huang, G.-B.; Yu, J.-H. Hydrogen peroxide in the vase solution increases vase life and keeping quality of cut Oriental × Trumpet hybrid lily “manissa”. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 139, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Khandaker, M.M.; Boyce, A.N.; Osman, N. The influence of hydrogen peroxide on the growth, development and quality of wax apple (Syzygium samarangense, [blume] merrill & LM. Perry var. Jambu madu) fruits. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 53, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  93. Bieker, S.; Riester, L.; Stahl, M.; Franzaring, J.; Zentgraf, U. Senescence-specific alteration of hydrogen peroxide levels in Arabidopsis thaliana and oilseed rape spring variety Brassica napus L. Cv. Mozart. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 54, 540–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Balazadeh, S.; Wu, A.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Salt-triggered expression of the ANAC092-dependent senescence regulon in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 733–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Balazadeh, S.; Kwasniewski, M.; Caldana, C.; Mehrnia, M.; Zanor, M.I.; Xue, G.-P.; Mueller-Roeber, B. ORS1, an H2O2-responsive nac transcription factor, controls senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant. 2011, 4, 346–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wu, A.; Allu, A.D.; Garapati, P.; Siddiqui, H.; Dortay, H.; Zanor, M.I.; Asensi-Fabado, M.A.; Munne-Bosch, S.; Antonio, C.; Tohge, T.; et al. JUNGBRUNNEN1, a reactive oxygen species-responsive NAC transcription factor, regulates longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 482–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Garapati, P.; Xue, G.P.; Munne-Bosch, S.; Balazadeh, S. Transcription factor ATAF1 in arabidopsis promotes senescence by direct regulation of key chloroplast maintenance and senescence transcriptional cascades. Plant Physiol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Chen, H.J.; Wu, S.D.; Huang, G.J.; Shen, C.Y.; Afiyanti, M.; Li, W.J.; Lin, Y.H. Expression of a cloned sweet potato catalase SPCAT1 alleviates ethephon-mediated leaf senescence and H2O2 elevation. J. Plant Pysiol. 2012, 169, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Prasad, T.K.; Anderson, M.D.; Martin, B.A.; Stewart, C.R. Evidence for chilling-induced oxidative stress in maize seedlings and a regulatory role for hydrogen peroxide. Plant Cell 1994, 6, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Gao, Y.; Guo, Y.-K.; Lin, S.-H.; Fang, Y.-Y.; Bai, J.-G. Hydrogen peroxide pretreatment alters the activity of antioxidant enzymes and protects chloroplast ultrastructure in heat-stressed cucumber leaves. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 126, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sielewiesiuk, J. Why there are photodamages to photosystem II at low light intensities. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2002, 24, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Krieger-Liszkay, A. Singlet oxygen production in photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pospíšil, P.; Šnyrychová, I.; Nauš, J. Dark production of reactive oxygen species in photosystem II membrane particles at elevated temperature: EPR spin-trapping study. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1767, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Morker, K.H.; Roberts, M.R. Light as both an input and an output of wound-induced reactive oxygen formation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1087–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Alboresi, A.; Dall’osto, L.; Aprile, A.; Carillo, P.; Roncaglia, E.; Cattivelli, L.; Bassi, R. Reactive oxygen species and transcript analysis upon excess light treatment in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana vs. a photosensitive mutant lacking zeaxanthin and lutein. BMC Plant. Biol. 2011, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Op den Camp, R.G.L.; Przybyla, D.; Ochsenbein, C.; Laloi, C.; Kim, C.; Danon, A.; Wagner, D.; Hideg, É.; Göbel, C.; Feussner, I.; et al. Rapid induction of distinct stress responses after the release of singlet oxygen in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2320–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kim, C.; Meskauskiene, R.; Apel, K.; Laloi, C. No single way to understand singlet oxygen signalling in plants. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Krasnovsky, A.A., Jr. Singlet molecular oxygen in photobiochemical systems: IR phosphorescence studies. Membr. Cell Biol. 1998, 12, 665–690. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Sies, H.; Menck, C.F.M. Singlet oxygen induced DNA damage. Mutat. Res./DNAging 1992, 275, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Skovsen, E.; Snyder, J.W.; Lambert, J.D.C.; Ogilby, P.R. Lifetime and diffusion of singlet oxygen in a cell. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8570–8573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Fischer, B.B.; Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Hideg, E.; Snyrychova, I.; Wiesendanger, M.; Eggen, R.I. Role of singlet oxygen in chloroplast to nucleus retrograde signaling in chlamydomonas reinhardtii. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 5555–5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wagner, D.; Przybyla, D.; Op den Camp, R.; Kim, C.; Landgraf, F.; Lee, K.P.; Wursch, M.; Laloi, C.; Nater, M.; Hideg, E.; et al. The genetic basis of singlet oxygen-induced stress responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 2004, 306, 1183–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ramel, F.; Birtic, S.; Ginies, C.; Soubigou-Taconnat, L.; Triantaphylides, C.; Havaux, M. Carotenoid oxidation products are stress signals that mediate gene responses to singlet oxygen in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 5535–5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Dall’Osto, L.; Lico, C.; Alric, J.; Giuliano, G.; Havaux, M.; Bassi, R. Lutein is needed for efficient chlorophyll triplet quenching in the major LHCII antenna complex of higher plants and effective photoprotection in vivo under strong light. BMC Plant. Biol. 2006, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Dall’Osto, L.; Cazzaniga, S.; Havaux, M.; Bassi, R. Enhanced photoprotection by protein-bound vs. free xanthophyll pools: A comparative analysis of chlorophyll b and xanthophyll biosynthesis mutants. Mol. Plant. 2010, 3, 576–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. González-Pérez, S.; Gutiérrez, J.; García-García, F.; Osuna, D.; Dopazo, J.; Lorenzo, Ó.; Revuelta, J.L.; Arellano, J.B. Early transcriptional defense responses in arabidopsis cell suspension culture under high-light conditions. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1439–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Munné-Bosch, S.; Jubany-Marí, T.; Alegre, L. Drought-induced senescence is characterized by a loss of antioxidant defences in chloroplasts. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Berger, S.; Weichert, H.; Porzel, A.; Wasternack, C.; Kühn, H.; Feussner, I. Enzymatic and non-enzymatic lipid peroxidation in leaf development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1533, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, M.P.; Zhang, C.J.; Yu, G.H.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Strasser, R.J.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Yang, X.S.; Chen, G.X. Changes in chloroplast ultrastructure, fatty acid components of thylakoid membrane and chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in flag leaves of a super-high-yield hybrid rice and its parents during the reproductive stage. J. Plant Pysiol. 2010, 167, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Triantaphylides, C.; Krischke, M.; Hoeberichts, F.A.; Ksas, B.; Gresser, G.; Havaux, M.; van Breusegem, F.; Mueller, M.J. Singlet oxygen is the major reactive oxygen species involved in photooxidative damage to plants. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 960–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Arora, A.; Sairam, R.K.; Srivastava, G.C. Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants. Curr. Sci. 2002, 82, 1227–1238. [Google Scholar]
  123. Thompson, J.E.; Legge, R.L.; Barber, R.F. The role of free radicals in senescence and wounding. New Phytol. 1987, 105, 317–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jajic, I.; Sarna, T.; Strzalka, K. Senescence, Stress, and Reactive Oxygen Species. Plants 2015, 4, 393-411. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants4030393

AMA Style

Jajic I, Sarna T, Strzalka K. Senescence, Stress, and Reactive Oxygen Species. Plants. 2015; 4(3):393-411. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants4030393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jajic, Ivan, Tadeusz Sarna, and Kazimierz Strzalka. 2015. "Senescence, Stress, and Reactive Oxygen Species" Plants 4, no. 3: 393-411. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants4030393

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop